• The Guardian confirme la présence de troupes françaises et britanniques au sol en Libye.

    (« Libya conflict : British and French soldiers help rebels prepare Sirte attack » par Chris Stephen at Kilometre Sixty et Richard Norton-Taylor, The Guardian , 25 Août 2011)

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/25/libya-conflict-british-french-soldiers-rebels-sirte?mobile-redirect=fals

    British and French special forces are on the ground in eastern Libya, calling in air strikes and helping rebel units as they prepare to assault Sirte, the last coastal town still in the hands of pro-Gaddafi forces, a rebel officer has told the Guardian.

    The soldiers have taken a leading role not only in guiding bombers to blast a path for opposition fighters but also in planning the offensive that finally broke the six-month siege of Misrata, Mohammed Subka, a communications specialist in the Al Watum (My Home) brigade, said.
    On Thursday afternoon, Subka and his unit waited at the rebel frontline, known as Kilometre Sixty, aboard a column of battered, black pickup trucks mounted with heavy machine guns and a few tanks recently captured from Gaddafi’s forces.
    “We are with the England team,” he told the Guardian. “They advise us.”
    [...]
    Subka said British and French units had been operating in Misrata for several weeks, based somewhere near the city’s port, Kasa Ahmed. Of the two, he said the British were the more friendly.
    [...]
    The British and French units also helped opposition fighters assault Zlitan at the weekend in the first stage of the offensive that took rebel units into Tripoli.

    Cloak and dagger Low-key role of SAS

    British special forces soldiers in Libya currently number fewer than 30, but the size of the deployment could be increased if the security situation deteriorates and the hunt for Gaddafi and his entourage drags on.

    SAS troops have so far taken an undercover role, training rebel groups in advance of the attack on Tripoli. They have been working with French commandos and special forces from a number of east European countries. British defence officials, perhaps for political reasons, are emphasising the role played by Qatari special forces, notably in the storming of Gaddafi’s compound, and those of the UAE.

    SAS soldiers, whose role in Libya was first reported in the Guardian, have long experience of hunting down prominent individuals, a task they carried out in Bosnia in the search for war criminals, in Iraq, where they tracked down leading al-Qaida operatives, and in Afghanistan, where US generals praised their role in killing Taliban commanders.

    However, in Libya their primary task is likely to remain that of advisers, UK defence officials said. Their presence in any final shoot-out with Gaddafi would not be welcome, either in Libya or in London, officials suggest. Richard Norton-Taylor

    #Libye #OTAN #propagande

    • http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/23/sas-troopers-help-coordinate-rebels?mobile-redirect=false

      («SAS troopers help co-ordinate rebel attacks in Libya», par Richard Norton-Taylor, The Guardian, 23 août 2011)

      The Guardian has learned that a number of serving British special forces soldiers, as well as former SAS troopers, are advising and training rebel forces, although their presence is officially denied.

      The Guardian has previously reported the presence of former British special forces troops, now employed by private security companies and funded by a number of sources, including Qatar. They have been joined by a number of serving SAS soldiers.

      They have been acting as forward air controllers – directing pilots to targets – and communicating with Nato operational commanders. They have also been advising rebels on tactics, a task they have not found easy.

      For the SAS it is a return to old stamping grounds. In one of their first successful missions in the second world war, they attacked airfields in Libya, destroying 60 aircraft. SAS battle honours include Tobruk in 1941 and a raid on Benghazi in 1942.

      They returned to Libya in February this year, even before the UN mandate urging states to protect civilians from Gaddafi’s forces. Shortly afterwards, a group of SAS soldiers were seized, though quickly released, by nervous rebels south of Benghazi when their Chinook helicopter landed two MI6 officers with communications equipment.

      SAS soldiers later advised Misrata-based rebel forces who secured the port city and helped to pass on details of the locations of Gaddafi’s forces to British commanders in the UK and the Naples headquarters of Canadian commander of Nato forces, Lt Gen Charles Bouchard.

      In what is hoped to be the endgame in the Libyan conflict and the fight to oust Gaddafi, a number of SAS soldiers are now advising the rebels as they storm the capital, Tripoli.

      France is understood to have deployed special forces in Libya and Qatari and Jordanian special forces are believed to have also played a role.

    • Selon le Guardian, des forces spéciales du Qatar, de la France, du Royaume Uni et de pays d’Europe de l’Est ont participé à l’attaque de Tripoli.

      (« Assault on Tripoli ’planned weeks ago’ », par Richard Norton-Taylor et Dominic Rushe, The Guardian, 25 août 2011)

      British military and civilian advisers, including special forces troops, along with those from France, Italy and Qatar, have spent months with rebel fighters, giving them key, up-to-date intelligence and watching out for any al-Qaida elements trying to infiltrate the rebellion.
      [...]
      Covert special forces teams from Qatar, France, Britain and some east European states provided critical assistance, such as logisticians, forward air controllers for the rebel army, as well as damage-assessment analysts and other experts, a diplomat at Nato’s HQ in Brussels told AP.

      [Si quelqu’un à trouvé la dépêche d’AP citée par cet article ?]

    • («Libya : a new breed of military intervention», par Richard Norton-Taylor, The Guardian, 25 août 2011)
      http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/25/libya-military-intervention?CMP=twt_gu

      The Libyan conflict gave birth to a new kind of covert intervention involving military advisers and special forces, not from the US – not even only from European countries, notably Britain’s SAS – but those of Arab countries, notably Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.

      They were engaged in denial operations, supported not by US dollars, but by Gulf money and weapons. Europeans, mainly British, French, and Italian, provided training and communications equipment. The US, out of the limelight, supplied pilotless drones and detailed, real-time, intelligence which played an important role. As the Guardian reported, British special forces, with those from other countries, including Qatar, and rebel commanders have been planning “Mermaid Dawn” for weeks: a carefully worked out assault on Tripoli involving co-ordinated action by Nato bombers, rebel sleeper cells, and a flotilla of boats from Misrata.

      [Reprise de Nidal : http://seenthis.net/messages/32477]


  • Causes of the riots: Old truths and new technologies | Editorial | Comment is free | The Guardian
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/24/riots-causes-social-media

    Eleven years ago fuel protesters held Britain to ransom, and it became a commonplace to account for their success in terms of the new-fangled mobile phones which lorry drivers were using to text message one another. A generation before, the crackling cassette recordings of Ayatollah Khomeini’s harangues which circulated in Tehran were said to have played no small part in fomenting the Iranian revolution. In an earlier epoch, the development of Dutch presses and distribution networks which churned out “libelles” targeting French royalty was, according to some historians, the catalyst for the storming of the Bastille.

    Today Facebook, Twitter and BlackBerry are commanded to attend a Home Office summit for earnest discussion about the role their networks played in the spasm of criminal disorder that gripped English streets so recently. The hysterically harsh sentences already handed down in one or two cases of pro-riot social messaging is a reminder that moral panic can often follow hot on the heels of new technology.

    #ukriots #technologie


  • Libya’s imperial hijacking is a threat to the Arab revolution | Seumas Milne | The Guardian (via @angryarab)
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/24/libyas-imperial-hijacking-threat-arab-revolution

    But the facts are unavoidable. Without the 20,000 air sorties, arms supplies and logistical support of the most powerful states in the world, they would not be calling the shots in Tripoli today. The assault on the capital was supported by the heaviest Nato bombardment to date. Western intelligence and special forces have been on the ground for months – in mockery of the UN – training, planning and co-ordinating rebel operations.

    It was the leading Nato states that championed and funded the Transitional National Council – including members with longstanding CIA and MI6 links – and officials from Nato states who drew up the stabilisation plan now being implemented on the ground.


  • Libya : a new breed of military intervention | Richard Norton-Taylor | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/25/libya-military-intervention?CMP=twt_gu

    The Libyan conflict gave birth to a new kind of covert intervention involving military advisers and special forces, not from the US – not even only from European countries, notably Britain’s SAS – but those of Arab countries, notably Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.

    They were engaged in denial operations, supported not by US dollars, but by Gulf money and weapons. Europeans, mainly British, French, and Italian, provided training and communications equipment. The US, out of the limelight, supplied pilotless drones and detailed, real-time, intelligence which played an important role. As the Guardian reported, British special forces, with those from other countries, including Qatar, and rebel commanders have been planning “Mermaid Dawn” for weeks: a carefully worked out assault on Tripoli involving co-ordinated action by Nato bombers, rebel sleeper cells, and a flotilla of boats from Misrata.

    Beaucoup d’euphémismes dans ces deux paragraphes...


  • In praise of… odd offices | Editorial | Comment is free | The Guardian
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/24/in-praise-odd-offices

    It’s surprising to see that Roberto Calderoli, the Italian politician reported last week to have “lashed out” at overpaid footballers complaining about their tax bills, holds office as “minister for simplification”. Two questions suggest themselves. Simplification of what, exactly? Of tax liabilities? Of the moral choices of footballers? Or possibly of his prime minister’s private life, which could certainly do with it?



  • Looting with the lights on | Naomi Klein | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/17/looing-with-lights-off

    There have, however, been other mass lootings in recent years, and perhaps we should talk about them too. There was Baghdad in the aftermath of the US invasion – a frenzy of arson and looting that emptied libraries and museums. The factories got hit too. In 2004 I visited one that used to make refrigerators. Its workers had stripped it of everything valuable, then torched it so thoroughly that the warehouse was a sculpture of buckled sheet metal.

    #UKriots


  • “Liberalism emerged as a revolutionary ideology reflecting the ambitions of the rising bourgeoisie in relation to the abolition of feudal privilege. Liberalism won its decisive political victories in the revolutions in England, the US and France in the 17th and 18th centuries. Its rise was concurrent with the rise of capitalism. With the consolidation of capitalism, the tenor of liberalism shifted from emancipatory optimism to a more conservative stance, suspicious of grand projects of social change.”

    “Nevertheless, because liberalism proclaimed radically universalist principles – most notably, liberty and equality for all – the doctrine provided ideological resources that could be taken up by hitherto oppressed groups. Those excluded from the early realm of liberal equality and freedom – slaves, women and working-class men – drew on the universalism of liberal principles in order to demand inclusion. So the historical development of liberalism was shaped not only by the interests of the wealthy but also by the struggles of the marginalised.”

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/15/liberalism-political-economic-different-ideologies


  • Charlie Brooker | How to prevent more riots | Comment is free | The Guardian
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/14/charlie-brooker-prevent-more-riots

    As well as addressing the gulf between the haves and have-nots I’d look at TV shows that confuse achievement with the acquisition of bling

    In the smouldering aftermath, some politicians, keen to shift the focus from social inequality, have muttered darkly about the role of BlackBerry Messenger, Twitter and Facebook – frightening new technologies that, like the pen and the human mouth, allow citizens to swap messages with one another. Some have even called for the likes of Twitter to be temporarily suspended in times of great national crisis. That’d be reassuring – like the scene at the start of a zombie movie where the news bulletin is suddenly replaced by a whistling tone and a stark caption reading PLEASE STAND BY. The last thing we need in an emergency is the ability to share information. Perhaps the government could also issue us with gags we could slip over our mouths the moment the sirens start wailing? Hey, we could still communicate if we really had to. Provided we have learned semaphore.

    ....

    Back in the 80s the pioneering aspirational soap opera Dallas dangled an unattainable billionaire lifestyle in front of millions, but at least had the nous to make the Ewing family miserable and consumed with self-loathing. At the same time, shows aimed at kids were full of presenters cheerfully making puppets out of old yoghurt pots, while shows aimed at teens largely depicted cheeky urchins copping off with each other in the dole queue. Today, whenever my world-weary eyes alight on a “youth show” it merely resembles a glossily edited advert for celebrity lifestyles, co-starring a jet-ski and a tower of gold. And regardless of the time slot, every other commercial shrieks that I deserve the best of everything. I and I alone. I’d gladly introduce a law requiring broadcasters to show five minutes of footage of a rich man dying alone for every 10 minutes of fevered avarice. It’d be worth it just to see them introduce it on T4.

    If we were to delete all aspirational programming altogether, the schedules might feel a bit empty, so I’d fill the void with footage of a well-stocked Foot Locker window, thereby tricking any idiots tuning in on a recently looted television into smashing the screen in an attempt to grab the coveted trainers within.

    .....

    But perhaps it’s better to nip future trouble in the bud with the use of deterrents. Obviously a small percentage of the rioters are sociopaths, and you’ll never make any kind of impression on their psyche without a cranial drill. But the majority should be susceptible to threats. Not violent ones – we’re not animals – but creatively unpleasant ones. Forget the water cannon. Unleash the slurry cannon. That kind of thing.

    Greater Manchester police has attracted attention by using Twitter as a substitute for the “perp walk”: naming-and-shaming rioters by tweeting their personal details as they leave court. Not bad, but maybe not humiliating enough. Personally, I’d seal them inside a Perspex box glued to a billboard overlooking a main plaza for a week, where people can turn up and jeer at them. It’s not totally inhumane: they would be fed through a tube in the top – but crucially, they would be fed nothing but cabbage, asparagus and figs, and since they wouldn’t be allowed out for toilet breaks, it would be getting pretty unpleasant in there after 48 hours. And it would be a cheery pick-me-up for passersby.

    #UKriots


  • Please Britain, don’t let Mubarak inspire your response to unrest | Mona Eltahawy | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/12/riots-egyptian-mubarak-civil-liberties

    Water cannon? Calling in the army? Shutting down or disrupting mobile phone messaging services and social networks in times of civil disorder? Oh the irony of ironies. Six months after my country’s dictator, Hosni Mubarak, stepped down after 18 days of a popular uprising, British prime minister David Cameron, members of parliament and the security services were seriously discussing those draconian measures in response to days of riots.

    #UKriots


  • For black Britons, this is not the 80s revisited. It’s worse | Joseph Harker | The Guardian
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/11/black-britons-80s-mps-media?mobile-redirect=false

    So no, this is not 1981. In many ways it’s worse. Those riots were in their own way aspirational – people thought things could get better. This time all the indicators seem to be pointing downwards.

    #ukriots