• Pause #pipi (1/4)

    « Tu fais encore pipi au lit mais t’as déjà intériorisé qu’il y a des toilettes pour les filles et pour les garçons »

    « Ah si je pouvais faire pipi debout ! » Quelle personne dotée d’une vulve n’a pas eu, ce ne serait-ce qu’une seule, fois cette pensée traverser son esprit ? Position privilégiée ou imposée, dominante ou enfermante ? Et la lunette, levée ou baissée ? Geste anodin ou subi au quotidien ? Qu’est-ce qu’est-ce que ces positions aux toilettes déterminent de notre position dans la société ? C’est le début d’une enquête décalée et documentée. Pour commencer, remontons à la petite enfance. Tandis que les toilettes non mixtes et les urinoirs font leur entrée à l’école élémentaire, les codes genrés s’assimilent goutte après goutte...

    Pause pipi
    Chaque jour, nous évacuons en moyenne 1,5 à 2 litres d’urine - soit, dans une vie, l’équivalent d’un camion-citerne par personne ! Faire pipi, est si universel et quotidien, que nous en oublions de questionner ce qui se joue derrière chaque miction : un rapport à son propre corps, à son identité et au monde. Avec malice, Julie Auzou ausculte notre époque par la lunette (relevée ou non, là est la question) en mêlant témoignages de proches, d’une sociologue-géographe, d’un photographe et de personnes rencontrées au fil de ses recherches. Chez soi, dans son lit, à l’école, en manif, dans les bars ou en festival : de l’intimité la plus secrète aux mouvements les plus collectifs, qu’est-ce que l’acte d’uriner révèle de nos rapports de genre ? Une production ARTE Radio.

    https://www.arteradio.com/son/61678850/pause_pipi_1_4
    #podcast #audio #genre #filles #garçons #toilettes #intériorisation #pipi_debout #position #enfants

  • L’arrêté « anti-précaires » d’Angoulême nie le droit d’exister, par Jérôme Lèbre – Libération
    https://www.liberation.fr/idees-et-debats/tribunes/larrete-anti-precaires-dangouleme-nie-le-droit-dexister-par-jerome-lebre-

    Le problème n’est alors pas seulement que les précaires stationnent aux bords des lignes que suit le dynamisme économique, mais aussi qu’ils ne sont jamais les seuls à s’arrêter. Les Angoumoisins hostiles à l’arrêté proposent ainsi ironiquement de verbaliser les enfants ou les spectateurs assis à l’extérieur et photographiés sur la page Facebook de leur mairie. Aussi bien nous savons à quel point le dispositif mobilier anti-SDF déployé partout pénalise tout le monde, l’agressivité à spectre large contre la précarité se muant inévitablement en hostilité générale de la ville, en déni global d’hospitalité.

    L’arrêté anti-immobilité lance alors la municipalité dans une exégèse qui le montre ciblant virtuellement tout le monde, et donc personne. La mesure vise des « groupes » censés entraver la circulation : dealers « en paquets de cinq ou six », buveurs de canettes « à cinq, six, sept, huit », « avec trois chiens », tous finissant par former « un agglomérat de dealers, de marginaux et de gens du voyage ».

    Or si ce dernier est un produit de l’esprit qui amalgame situations délictueuses et statuts légitimes, il traduit aussi sans le vouloir l’intuition que l’espace public est le lieu d’une communauté des immobiles, qui inclut les précaires, les voyageurs ou les passants qui se reposent (avec ou sans chien), les gens du voyage quand ils ne voyagent pas, ou rétrospectivement cette Angoumoisine témoignant des bombardements de 1944 : « On allait s’allonger dans la rue et on voyait les volets qui tremblaient. »

    La municipalité s’en remet alors au jugement de la police, qui ne peut exécuter l’arrêté qu’en réaménageant tacitement les critères de la caduque condamnation de « vagabondage ». Toute loi sur la circulation transforme la politique en opération de police ; et toute loi sur l’immobilité laisse la police seule et sans droit. Car s’il est bien un droit, c’est celui « de se déplacer et de s’installer dans l’espace public (1) ». Celui-ci n’est pas propre aux personnes sans abri, il réfute plutôt toute différence entre « elles » et « nous ».

    A vrai dire, ce qu’il préserve, c’est le « droit d’exister » ; car ex-stare veut dire cela : « se tenir dehors ». L’arrêté d’Angoulême vise donc l’existence même des précaires (dans toutes les positions, et même en toute saison !), et avec elle le fond de toute coexistence, lequel remonte à la surface dans le fait d’habiter la même ville, d’y être, de l’occuper, de ne pas seulement la traverser comme des passants.

    #précaires #espace_public #ville

    • L’arrêté « antiprécaires » de la mairie d’Angoulême suspendu partiellement par la justice administrative
      https://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2023/08/07/l-arrete-antiprecaires-de-la-mairie-d-angouleme-suspendu-partiellement-par-l

      La juge des référés a estimé que l’interdiction visant « la station assise ou allongée » présentait un « caractère trop général et insuffisamment précis », portant une atteinte disproportionnée à la liberté d’aller et venir et à la liberté de réunion.

      [...]

      « Le tapage nocturne, l’ivresse publique, la mendicité agressive… toutes ces infractions sont déjà prévues par le code pénal. Et dans les pièces du dossier, on nous parle systématiquement de sécurité, or seul le préfet est compétent » en la matière, pointe l’avocate [de la LDH, d’habitants et d’assos de lutte contre le mal-logement], pour qui le texte a « juste pour objet de se débarrasser d’une population que la société juge incommode ».

      L’adjoint à la prévention et sécurité publique [...], assurait quant à lui que le texte [...] « n’est qu’un outil pour retrouver une gestion paisible de l’espace public », qui « ne concerne que 6 % de la superficie de la ville », expliquait-il, en pointant « près de 400 mains courantes » déposées auprès de la police municipale depuis trois ans et en se prévalant du soutien des #commerçants.

      La cité charentaise avait déjà connu pareille polémique en 2014, lorsqu’elle avait fait grillager des bancs publics à Noël. Outre Angoulême, des arrêtés similaires ont déjà été pris par plusieurs villes de l’Hexagone, dont La Rochelle, en juin, et ont souvent été retoqués par la justice, comme à Saint-Étienne ou à Bayonne ces dernières années.

      #Guerre_aux_pauvres

      edit tout se passe comme si on se préparait à ce que ne soit pas sanctionné lors d’un jugement sur le fond ? je ne comprend pas ce que signale Pascale Robert-Diard après n’avoir pas pigé pourquoi le titre de l’article cité ci-dessus disait "suspension partielle" ...

      https://www.lemonde.fr/societe/article/2023/08/07/arrete-anti-marginaux-a-angouleme-le-tribunal-met-en-avant-un-caractere-trop

      La juge a également limité le périmètre dans lequel « l’occupation abusive ou prolongée » serait interdite. Elle a ainsi exclu un certain nombre de rues ou de places visées par l’arrêté municipal, dont le parvis et le parking de la gare SNCF, ainsi qu’un parc et des squares. La commune d’Angoulême a été condamnée à verser 1 000 euros à la LDH au titre des frais de justice. La suspension prononcée lundi 7 août court jusqu’à ce que le tribunal administratif de Poitiers se prononce sur la procédure principale, à savoir la demande d’annulation complète et définitive de cet arrêté.

  • Vague de répression contre les migrants en Turquie : « J’envisage de retourner au Sénégal »

    Des vidéos amateurs envoyées à notre rédaction montrent des migrants africains arrêtés par la police turque dans le cadre d’une campagne de répression de l’immigration clandestine. Sur ces images, envoyées par des migrants du Sénégal, du Cameroun, de Guinée et d’Angola, des officiers hurlent sur les migrants et, dans certains cas, les violentent physiquement. Nos Observateurs, dont l’une des victimes visible dans une #vidéo, racontent.

    Les autorités turques ont lancé la répression au début du mois de juillet. Dans une interview publiée le 9 juillet, le ministre de l’intérieur, #Ali_Yerlikaya, a déclaré que la lutte contre l’immigration clandestine était l’une de ses priorités et que la #police d’Istanbul et des 81 provinces de Turquie intensifiait ses efforts pour arrêter et détenir les personnes se trouvant illégalement dans le pays.

    À Istanbul, la police a ainsi entamé le 4 juillet une série d’opérations de #ratissage de soir et de nuit, en se concentrant sur les lieux de sorties et les #espaces_publics. Elle affirme avoir arrêté 3 535 personnes au cours de la première semaine, soupçonnées d’être entrées illégalement en Turquie, d’avoir travaillé sans autorisation ou d’avoir dépassé la durée de validité de leur visa.

    Les vidéos envoyées à la rédaction des Observateurs par des migrants africains vivant en Turquie suggèrent un comportement violent de la part de la police.

    Une vidéo envoyée par des migrants du Sénégal et de Guinée montre la police plaquant au sol un homme africain au milieu d’une foule. Les policiers ne portaient pas d’uniforme, mais des menottes. La victime a demandé son téléphone à plusieurs reprises, ce qui a mis en colère le policier qui le maintenait au sol. Le policier lui a crié dessus et l’a ensuite giflé.

    Dans cette vidéo, envoyée par des migrants africains aux Observateurs de France 24 via WhatsApp et également postée sur Twitter, on voit le propriétaire d’un salon de coiffure sénégalais se faire gifler par un policier turc après avoir été arrêté pour un contrôle d’immigration. L’homme sénégalais a déclaré aux observateurs de France 24 que son permis de séjour était en cours de renouvellement.

    L’incident a eu lieu à Istanbul le mercredi 19 juillet. En utilisant les images disponibles sur Google Maps, notre rédaction a pu déterminer que l’incident s’est produit à l’entrée du centre commercial souterrain. Plusieurs migrants subsahariens vivant à Istanbul ont confirmé l’endroit.

    Le quartier environnant, Aksaray, regorge de magasins de vêtements et d’alimentaire tenus par des Africains.

    "Chaque fois que des policiers me voient, ils me demandent mes papiers"

    La rédaction des Observateurs a réussi à identifier et à contacter l’homme que l’on voit dans la vidéo : il s’agit de Mohamed Preira, un Sénégalais qui s’est installé en Turquie en 2019 et qui possède un salon de coiffure à Aksaray. Il déclare qu’il se rendait à son salon lorsqu’il a été arrêté par la police et avoir assuré aux agents ne pas avoir de permis de séjour sur lui parce qu’il était en cours de renouvellement.

    Ils ont pris mon téléphone et mon argent. Ils m’ont mis dans une voiture et m’ont conduit à un endroit où ils m’ont laissé partir. Eux-mêmes savent qu’ils n’ont pas le droit de m’arrêter. Mais je ne peux même pas porter plainte contre eux.

    J’ai déposé mes documents [pour renouveler mon statut de résident] et on m’a donné un reçu. Je suis en train d’obtenir les documents pour avoir le droit de vivre ici.

    Ce n’est pas la première fois qu’on m’arrête. Chaque fois que des policiers me voient, ils me demandent mes papiers. Mais ces policiers étaient tout simplement racistes. Maintenant, tout mon corps me fait mal.

    J’ai mon propre salon de coiffure à Istanbul. Je paie mon loyer. Mais la situation s’est aggravée, les contrôles sont de plus en plus nombreux. Maintenant, j’envisage de retourner au Sénégal. Vivre dans un autre pays, sans argent, c’est trop dur.

    #Turkey is one of the countries where #refugees are most often subjected to violence, both by society and the authorities.
    This video showing police violence was shared on social media yesterday.
    In #Istanbul, a migrant-refugee from #Africa was beaten and detained by the police.… pic.twitter.com/l4S1UAh2Ld
    — Vedat Yeler (@vedatyeler_) July 14, 2023

    Notre rédaction a reçu de très nombreuses vidéos montrant l’usage de la force par la police. L’une de ces vidéos, également publiée sur Twitter, montre deux policiers en uniforme tenant un migrant africain tandis qu’un troisième policier peut être vu en train de lui pousser la tête vers le sol. Alors qu’ils l’éloignent, le troisième policier se moque apparemment de la victime en lui tapant dans la main.

    Plusieurs migrants africains nous ont déclaré que l’incident avait eu lieu dans le quartier d’Esenyurt à Istanbul. L’imagerie satellite semble confirmer l’endroit, mais nous n’avons pas pu contacter l’homme qui a été arrêté.

    "Nous avons été traités comme des criminels parce que nous n’avons pas les papiers qu’ils refusent de nous donner”

    En novembre 2022, un rapport de Human Rights Watch estimait que les migrants détenus en Turquie sans papiers étaient souvent incarcérés dans des centres de détention surpeuplés, sans accès suffisant à une assistance juridique et à leurs familles.

    "Cédric" (pseudonyme) un Camerounais qui a parlé à notre rédaction de France 24 sous couvert d’anonymat, a été arrêté à Istanbul en décembre 2022 alors qu’il attendait une mise à jour de son statut de résident :

    Nous étions 12 à être détenus dans des chambres prévues pour six personnes. Nous étions censés avoir le droit de parler à nos familles, mais ils ont pris nos téléphones. Les conditions étaient horribles. J’ai vu beaucoup de suicides. Nous avons été traités comme des criminels parce que nous n’avions pas les papiers qu’ils refusaient de nous donner. Ils ne nous permettent pas d’avoir nos propres avocats. Ils ne vous laissent voir que leurs avocats.

    “Cédric” raconte qu’il a été autorisé à quitter le centre au bout de deux mois et qu’on lui a remis un document qui l’autorisait uniquement à vivre à Bartin, une petite ville située à 400 km d’Istanbul. Mais il n’est pas resté : "Il n’y avait pas d’opportunités là-bas et les gens étaient racistes, alors je suis retourné à Istanbul” dit-il.

    "Les migrants de toutes nationalités sont confrontés à de nombreuses violations des droits de l’Homme"

    Contacté, Mahmut Kaçan, un avocat turc spécialisé dans les droits des migrants, affirme que le système d’immigration du pays est devenu plus restrictif au cours des deux dernières années.

    Au cours des deux dernières années, les demandes d’asile n’ont pas été acceptées, que l’on soit un migrant régulier ou irrégulier. Ces dernières années, et pendant les élections [de mai 2023], il y a eu un débat. Le gouvernement actuel et l’opposition affirment qu’ils expulseront tous les réfugiés.

    Les migrants de toutes nationalités sont confrontés à de nombreuses violations des droits de l’Homme. Je reçois des plaintes, mais comme ces migrants ne sont pas correctement enregistrés, ils ne sont pas en mesure de déposer des plaintes et de contacter des ONG.

    https://observers.france24.com/fr/moyen-orient/20230721-turquie-migrants-violence-arrestations

    #migrations #Turquie #répression #asile #réfugiés #racisme_anti-noirs #sans-papiers #rafles

  • Accélération du transfert massif de données depuis vaisseaux et stellites.
    http://www.argotheme.com/organecyberpresse/spip.php?article4491

    Un seul téraoctet équivaut à environ 500 heures de vidéo haute définition. On peut envoyer plusieurs téraoctets de données de test à la Terre en un seul passage de six minutes sur une station au sol. Avant, il fallait plus d’heures. Voilà réellement ce que la NASA a réussi à faire en matière de communication de l’espace astronomique... #TECHNOLOGIE,_INTERNET,_PERFORMANCES_INCLASSABLES

    / #espace,_fusée,_exploration,_NASA,_étoiles,_espace,_technologie,_ISS, #technologie,_drone,_citoyen,_USA,_google,_High_Tech

  • Petit rappel qu’en 2014 la municipalité d’#Angoulême installait des #grillages autour de #bancs_publics situés proches d’un centre commercial pour décourager les SDF. Aujourd’hui ce sont des amendes de 35 € si tu occupe l’espace public.


    Photo Pierre Duffour/AFP

    #mobilier_urbain #anti-sdf #anti-réfugiés #cages #espace_public #amende

    ajouté à la métaliste sur le #mobilier_urbain #anti-sdf / #anti-réfugiés :
    https://seenthis.net/messages/732278

    Et sur les cages à Angoulême :
    https://seenthis.net/messages/769639

  • À Angoulême, être debout, assis ou allongé dans la rue peut désormais coûter 35 euros d’amende - Le Parisien
    https://www.leparisien.fr/charente-16/a-angouleme-etre-debout-assis-ou-allonge-dans-la-rue-peut-desormais-coute

    La capitale charentaise vient de signer un arrêté contre « l’occupation abusive de l’espace public ». Sont notamment visés les marginaux, les voyageurs et les jeunes « pour rappeler les règles de savoir-vivre ».

    « occupation abusive de l’espace public » ?! après la loi Kasbarian, on ne pouvait faire plus cru. s’assoir dehors, c’est louer un siège ou rien. Espace public, mon cul.

    #en_marche #occupation #espace_public (feu l’) #occupation #on_achève_bien_les_chevaux #guerre_aux_pauvres #fascisme_apaisé

  • Kaoutar Harchi, écrivaine, sur la mort de Nahel M. : “Si eux vont sans honte, nous n’irons pas sans révolte”
    https://www.telerama.fr/debats-reportages/kaoutar-harchi-ecrivaine-sur-la-mort-de-nahel-si-eux-vont-sans-honte-nous-n

    Le Président Emmanuel Macron parlait, il y a peu, de la « décivilisation » de la société française. Le ministre de l’Intérieur Gérald Darmanin évoquait, lui, son « ensauvagement ». Désormais, face aux caméras, ça prend un air grave, ça présente ses condoléances aux proches de Nahel, ça veut montrer que ça a du cœur. Ça sait, surtout, que le monde entier a vu la vidéo du meurtre de Nahel. Ça ne peut plus miser sur le doute et le mensonge.

  • Croci di vetta

    Perché, in nome della laicità e della tutela ambientale, non utilizzare gli ometti di pietra?

    «Al convegno - a cui hanno partecipato Monsignor Melchor José Sànchez de Toca y Alameda (relatore del Dicastero delle Cause dei Santi), lo scrittore Marco Albino Ferrari in rappresentanza del CAI e il professore di diritto dell’Università Cattolica Marco Valentini - si è registrato un punto di convergenza culturale, giuridico, storico e perfino religioso; una prospettiva che ha trovato tra i presenti una larga concordanza sulla necessità di lasciare integre le croci esistenti, perché testimonianze significative di uno spaccato culturale, e allo stesso tempo di evitare l’istallazione di nuovi simboli sulle cime.

    Tesi, questa, condivisa pienamente dal Club Alpino Italiano.Il CAI guarda infatti con rispetto le croci esistenti, ma non solo: si preoccupa del loro stato ed eventualmente, in caso di necessità, si occupa della loro manutenzione (ripulendole dagli adesivi, restaurandole in caso di bruschi crolli, …). Questo perché – è giusto evidenziarlo una volta di più – rimuoverle sarebbe come cancellare una traccia del nostro cammino; un’impronta a cui guardare per abitare il presente con maggior consapevolezza.

    Ed è proprio il presente, un presente caratterizzato da un dialogo interculturale che va ampliandosi e da nuove esigenze paesaggistico-ambientali, a indurre il CAI a disapprovare la collocazione di nuove croci e simboli sulle nostre montagne». ( Lo scarpone 23.6.23 )

    Così viene riassunto da ’Lo Scarpone’ il dibattito che ha scatenato l’ennesima polemica sulle croci in vetta nel quale alcuni dei maggiori politici di governo hanno parlato di attacco alle radici cristiane del nostro paese. Da pastore valdese, cittadino italiano e alpinista mi vorrei limitare a due considerazioni e ad una proposta.

    Mi pare infatti che la questione sia del tutto simile a quella,più volte affrontata, dei crocifissi nelle aule scolastiche e dei tribunali o nelle stanze degli ospedali pubblici. La fede, dovrebbero saperlo i difensori delle croci e delle madonne in vetta, non si impone, bensì è un dono, così come, semplificando un po’ è un dono che Dio ci fa quello di morire in croce e risorgere per la nostra salvezza. Questo, da credente, è uno dei motivi per cui mi infastidisce personalmente il trovare in cima alle montagne una croce, un crocifisso o una statua della madonna, spesso di proporzioni spropositate.

    Imporre nello spazio pubblico, le vette sono terreno del demanio, un simbolo confessionale è in primo luogo un andare contro la predicazione di quello stesso Evangelo che si dice di volere predicare con quella croce. In secondo luogo da cittadino italiano continuo a ritenere che una confessione cristiana, per quanto largamente maggioritaria, non dovrebbe avere il potere in uno Stato laico e democratico di imporre un proprio simbolo religioso e confessionale infischiandosene dei cittadini non cattolici o diversamente cristiani a cui la croce dà fastidio o per i quali non rappresenta nulla. Compito dello Stato come sappiamo è garantire a ciascuna religione la libera espressione della propria fede, ma appunto nei propri spazi.

    Le croci sulle vette diventato così in questo caso il simbolo di un malcostume culturale del nostro paese: la cultura che dice che esistono le leggi ma se sei più ricco e più forte puoi fare un po’ come ti pare fregandotene degli altri, soprattutto se sono minoranze.

    La mia proposta per cercare di superare la polarità croce si o croce no è un tentativo di integrare canoni estetici e sostenibilità ecologica. Si tratta di riabilitare il vecchio «ometto» in pietra. Di solito realizzato con e le piccole pietre più o meno grandi sollevabili facilmente da una persona. È facile da costruire e da rimettere in piedi ogni anno dopo l’inverno, da parte di chi passa e ha voglia di dedicarci anche solo un minuto. Fatto di materiale locale a km O, non abbisogna di manutenzione, né di permessi perché è una struttura removibile. Non servono né cemento né cavi in acciaio per fissarlo e sopratutto non servono voli in elicottero per trasportare il materiale. Si risparmia così carburante e si afferma attraverso un simbolo, frutto della natura e dell’opera collettiva di manutenzione, il tentativo umano di prendersi cura del creato, lasciando meno tracce possibili del proprio passaggio pur volendo dare forma ad un qualcosa che segni il fatto che qualcuno di noi in quel luogo ci è stato.

    L’"ometto" in pietra, antico segno per indicare la giusta strada nei sentieri di montagna di mezzo mondo, ben più della violenza di una croce, simbolo parziale, imposta di forza sul suolo pubblico delle montagne in sprezzo alla costituzione, può invece ben rappresentare la fragilità del nostro ecosistema da proteggere. Questo sì un mandato non solo cristiano ed inclusivo ma sicuramente più urgente per tutto il pianeta.

    https://riforma.it/articolo/2023/06/27/croci-di-vetta
    #croix #montagne #cairn #laïcité #signes_religieux #religion #paysage #identité #espace_public #symbole

  • Les conquistadors de l’espace - Regarder le documentaire complet | ARTE
    https://www.arte.tv/fr/videos/105563-000-A/les-conquistadors-de-l-espace

    Alors que nos sociétés sont toujours plus dépendantes de l’#Internet à haut débit et des données transmises par #satellite, une nouvelle course à l’espace bouleverse l’équilibre géopolitique mondial. À 550 kilomètres de la Terre, l’entrepreneur américain Elon Musk déploie progressivement sa #constellation #Starlink, déjà constituée de plus de trois mille satellites destinés à apporter Internet jusqu’aux endroits les plus reculés de la planète. Mais à mesure que Musk met en place son maillage, la pression monte pour les États : laisseront-ils un acteur privé rafler la mise sur ce marché encore largement dérégulé, et menacer leur souveraineté numérique et leur indépendance technologique ? Tandis que Jeff Bezos, le PDG d’Amazon, réclame lui aussi sa part du gâteau, la Chine et l’Union européenne - avec le projet Iris, annoncé fin 2022 - se sont engagées à leur tour dans cette course.

    #espace #orbite_basse #course

  • #Stéphane_La_Branche « Il faut donner une alternative qui soit perçue comme étant viable ou désirable »

    Interview de Stéphane La Branche, Coordonnateur scientifique du GIECo (Groupe international pour l’évolution du comportement).

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsHyJAXGQuI


    #changement #comportement #changement_de_comportement #changement_climatique #climat #mobilité #alimentation #espace_public #espace_privé #habitudes #contraintes_désirables #contraintes #urgence #politiques_d'incitation #contrainte #imaginaire #scénarios

  • Le Code de la rue, bien plus qu’une histoire de mobilité urbaine - AOC media
    https://aoc.media/analyse/2023/06/14/le-code-de-la-rue-bien-plus-quune-histoire-de-mobilite-urbaine

    Loin d’être seulement un plaidoyer pour le ralentissement, l’idée d’un Code de la rue marque un changement de philosophie crucial dans la gestion de la voie publique : les caractéristiques sociales se retrouvent au cœur du projet urbain, où l’on donne la priorité aux plus faibles et à la connexion non polluante au sein d’un espace public repensé comme tel.

    (avec une magnifique publicité en prime :)))
    #urbanisme #espace_public #circulation #citoyenneté

  • The Battle At Lake Changjin
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LrxD2skTrvw

    Le message est clair : Le parti communiste chinois et l’L’Armée populaire de libération ont investi 200 millions de USD dans un film dont le succès témoigne du soutien du peuple chinois pour son armée. Le film raconte une bataille de la guerre de Corée et le triomphe des Chinois sur les troupes yankees.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Battle_at_Lake_Changjin

    The Battle at Lake Changjin (Chinese: 长津湖) is a 2021 Chinese war film co-directed and co-produced by Chen Kaige, Tsui Hark and Dante Lam, written by Lan Xiaolong and Huang Jianxin, and starring Wu Jing and Jackson Yee. It was commissioned by the Central Propaganda Department of the Chinese Communist Party as part of the Party’s 100th anniversary celebrations. The film depicts the story of the Chinese People’s Volunteer Army forcing U.S. forces to withdraw in a fictionalized retelling of the Battle of the Chosin Reservoir during the Korean War.

    The Battle at Lake Changjin is the most expensive film ever produced in China, with a budget of $200 million. The film grossed $913 million at the worldwide box office, making it the second-highest-grossing film of 2021, the highest-grossing Chinese film of all time, the highest-grossing non-English film, and the second highest-grossing film in a single market. A sequel to the film, The Battle at Lake Changjin II, was released on 1 February 2022.

    The film’s historical inaccuracies garnered controversy in some countries, including South Korea. The film has been described as propaganda.

    Commentaires sur Youtube :

    TacticalPause

    Former US marine here, loved this movie, kinda fun seeing how the Chinese depicted us in this film. I’m feeling extra villainous right now.

    Je pense que l’intérêt du film s’arrête là. Dans un autre commentaire l’utilisateur sugarbeets nous rappelle la folie sanglante du général MacArthur.

    sugarbeets

    A superb film with great producers and directors. The story should emphasize the lack of weapons and ammunitions in the PLA due to the treachery of Stalin ( USSR ) because they were not in friendly terms with China. Most of the military supply were from the captured or left behind munitions by the U.S., Japanese and the KMT Army at the end of WW2 and the subsequent Civil War when the KMT army loss and fled to Taiwan. During the Korean War, hundreds of thousands of PLA died due to lack of munition, food, medicines, cold exposure ( an unusually cold winter ),
    Gen. MacArthur wanted to destroy China with 50+ Atomic Bombs ( wipe China off the map ) a very cruel strategy. Thank our MERCIFUL GOD , the U.N. strongly vote against it as well as President Truman. Finally, Gen. MacArthur was fired by the President for insubordination because he strongly insisted on using massive A-bomb attack to destroy the whole China including all the women & children. Only a MAD AND EVIL MAN can do such a thing. If MacArthur really carried out the 50+ Thermonuclear bombing , we don’t know what the after effects might be to the EARTH. One thing for sure is that Russia ( USSR ) will be affected and maybe MacArthur also planned to destroy RUSSIA AS WELL ! The Earth for sure will be affected and we don’t know to what extent. “MAYBE ANOTHER MASS EXTINCTION !” And this ignorant World considered the U.S. as a BENEVOLENT COUNTRY at the end of WW2. IT’S A MAD, MAD, MAD, MAD WORLD !

    Nous connaissons les réalisateurs Chen Kaige, Tsui Hark et Dante Lam pour des oeuvres plus raffinées. Ici ils ont fait preuve d’un grand professionnalisme. Pourtant je trouve Dunkirk de Christopher Nolan plus touchant, mais je ne suis ni Chinois ni Américain.

    #Chine #Corée #USA #cinéma #guerre

  • Une nouvelle ancienne bibliothèque à Lille pour la photographie
    https://onpk.net/index.php/2023/05/23/860-une-nouvelle-ancienne-bibliotheque-lille-pour-la-photographie

    Au hasard d’un week-end tranquille à Lille, j’ai effectué un détour au nouveau musée lillois de la photographie. Les joies de la politique ayant abouti à la clôture de la Maison de la Photographie, c’est donc à l’Institut pour la Photographie qu’il faut se rendre, au 11 rue de Thionville....

    #Espace_urbain

  • Le savoir dans la crise
    https://laviedesidees.fr/Le-savoir-dans-la-crise

    L’économiste Michaël Zemmour, dont l’intervention fut décisive dans la séquence politique ouverte par la #réforme des #retraites, revient sur l’expertise, la statistique publique et les conditions à réunir pour que le savoir puisse jouer un rôle dans la crise démocratique et soutenir le mouvement social. Prise de vue & montage : A. Suhamy. #Entretiens

    / #Économie, #media, #communication, retraites, réforme, #expertise, #espace_public

  • L’espace public des hommes entre eux, une forme notoire de sexualité secrète
    https://metropolitiques.eu/L-espace-public-des-hommes-entre-eux-une-forme-notoire-de-sexualite-

    La sexualité secrète entre hommes est au cœur de cet épisode de l’émission « Le #genre en ville ». Laurent Gaissad, socio-anthropologue, revient sur les modalités de rencontre entre hommes, et sur la marginalisation sociale, spatiale et temporelle de leurs pratiques sexuelles. Émission : Le genre en ville Laurent Gaissad montre l’existence d’une recomposition territoriale et temporelle des espaces urbains lorsqu’ils deviennent des lieux de drague. L’organisation spatiale du désir décrite dans cet #Podcasts

    / sexualité, homosexualité, masculinité, genre

    #sexualité #homosexualité #masculinité

  • Les Algériens en région parisienne : entre espaces d’inclusion et d’exclusion
    https://metropolitiques.eu/Les-Algeriens-en-region-parisienne-entre-espaces-d-inclusion-et-d-ex

    Comment les #Algériens et Français d’origine algérienne de la métropole parisienne affirment-ils leurs identités et négocient-ils des espaces d’inclusion dans la sphère publique ? La géographe états-unienne Elizabeth Nelson livre son regard sur le modèle républicain français. Les pratiques d’intégration sociale et spatiale des immigrés algériens et de leurs descendants vivant en région parisienne traduisent souvent, au niveau local, un sentiment de malaise lié au fait de vivre et de travailler dans un #Terrains

    / Algériens, #banlieue, #inclusion, #exclusion, #espace, #Île-de-France, #Paris, #Algérie

    https://metropolitiques.eu/IMG/pdf/met-nelson-3.pdf

  • UK signs contract with US startup to identify migrants in small-boat crossings

    The UK government has turned a US-based startup specialized in artificial intelligence as part of its pledge to stop small-boat crossings. Experts have already pointed out the legal and logistical challenges of the plan.

    In a new effort to address the high number of Channel crossings, the UK Home Office is working with the US defense startup #Anduril, specialized in the use of artificial intelligence (AI).

    A surveillance tower has already been installed at Dover, and other technologies might be rolled out with the onset of warmer temperatures and renewed attempts by migrants to reach the UK. Some experts already point out the risks and practical loopholes involved in using AI to identify migrants.

    “This is obviously the next step of the illegal migration bill,” said Olivier Cahn, a researcher specialized in penal law.

    “The goal is to retrieve images that were taken at sea and use AI to show they entered UK territory illegally even if people vanish into thin air upon arrival in the UK.”

    The “illegal migration bill” was passed by the UK last month barring anyone from entering the country irregularly from filing an asylum claim and imposing a “legal duty” to remove them to a third country.
    Who is behind Anduril?

    Founded in 2017 by its CEO #Palmer_Luckey, Anduril is backed by #Peter_Thiel, a Silicon Valley investor and supporter of Donald Trump. The company has supplied autonomous surveillance technology to the US Department of Defense (DOD) to detect and track migrants trying to cross the US-Mexico border.

    In 2021, the UK Ministry of Defence awarded Anduril with a £3.8-million contract to trial an advanced base defence system. Anduril eventually opened a branch in London where it states its mission: “combining the latest in artificial intelligence with commercial-of-the-shelf sensor technology (EO, IR, Radar, Lidar, UGS, sUAS) to enhance national security through automated detection, identification and tracking of objects of interest.”

    According to Cahn, the advantage of Brexit is that the UK government is no longer required to submit to the General Data Protection Regulation (RGPDP), a component of data protection that also addresses the transfer of personal data outside the EU and EEA areas.

    “Even so, the UK has data protection laws of its own which the government cannot breach. Where will the servers with the incoming data be kept? What are the rights of appeal for UK citizens whose data is being processed by the servers?”, he asked.

    ’Smugglers will provide migrants with balaclavas for an extra 15 euros’

    Cahn also pointed out the technical difficulties of identifying migrants at sea. “The weather conditions are often not ideal, and many small-boat crossings happen at night. How will facial recognition technology operate in this context?”

    The ability of migrants and smugglers to adapt is yet another factor. “People are going to cover their faces, and anyone would think the smugglers will respond by providing migrants with balaclavas for an extra 15 euros.”

    If the UK has solicited the services of a US startup to detect and identify migrants, the reason may lie in AI’s principle of self-learning. “A machine accumulates data and recognizes what it has already seen. The US is a country with a significantly more racially and ethnically diverse population than the UK. Its artificial intelligence might contain data from populations which are more ethnically comparable to the populations that are crossing the Channel, like Somalia for example, thus facilitating the process of facial recognition.”

    For Cahn, it is not capturing the images which will be the most difficult but the legal challenges that will arise out of their usage. “People are going to be identified and there are going to be errors. If a file exists, there needs to be the possibility for individuals to appear before justice and have access to a judge.”

    A societal uproar

    In a research paper titled “Refugee protection in the artificial intelligence Era”, Chatham House notes “the most common ethical and legal challenges associated with the use of AI in asylum and related border and immigration systems involve issues of opacity and unpredictability, the potential for bias and unlawful discrimination, and how such factors affect the ability of individuals to obtain a remedy in the event of erroneous or unfair decisions.”

    For Cahn, the UK government’s usage of AI can only be used to justify and reinforce its hardline position against migrants. “For a government that doesn’t respect the Geneva Convention [whose core principle is non-refoulement, editor’s note] and which passed an illegal migration law, it is out of the question that migrants have entered the territory legally.”

    Identifying migrants crossing the Channel is not going to be the hardest part for the UK government. Cahn imagines a societal backlash with, “the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom being solicited, refugees seeking remedies to legal decisions through lawyers and associations attacking”.

    He added there would be due process concerning the storage of the data, with judges issuing disclosure orders. “There is going to be a whole series of questions which the government will have to elucidate. The rights of refugees are often used as a laboratory. If these technologies are ’successful’, they will soon be applied to the rest of the population."

    https://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/48326/uk-signs-contract-with-us-startup-to-identify-migrants-in-smallboat-cr

    #UK #Angleterre #migrations #asile #réfugiés #militarisation_des_frontières #frontières #start-up #complexe_militaro-industriel #IA #intelligence_artificielle #surveillance #technologie #channel #Manche

    –—

    ajouté à la métaliste sur la Bibby Stockholm:
    https://seenthis.net/messages/1016683

    • Huge barge set to house 500 asylum seekers arrives in the UK

      The #Bibby_Stockholm is being refitted in #Falmouth to increase its capacity from 222 to 506 people.

      A barge set to house 500 asylum seekers has arrived in the UK as the government struggles with efforts to move migrants out of hotels.

      The Independent understands that people will not be transferred onto the Bibby Stockholm until July, following refurbishment to increase its capacity and safety checks.

      The barge has been towed from its former berth in Italy to the port of Falmouth, in Cornwall.

      It will remain there while works are carried out, before being moved onto its final destination in #Portland, Dorset.

      The private operators of the port struck an agreement to host the barge with the Home Office without formal public consultation, angering the local council and residents.

      Conservative MP Richard Drax previously told The Independent legal action was still being considered to stop the government’s plans for what he labelled a “quasi-prison”.

      He accused ministers and Home Office officials of being “unable to answer” practical questions on how the barge will operate, such as how asylum seekers will be able to come and go safely through the port, what activities they will be provided with and how sufficient healthcare will be ensured.

      “The question is how do we cope?” Mr Drax said. “Every organisation has its own raft of questions: ‘Where’s the money coming from? Who’s going to do what if this all happens?’ There are not sufficient answers, which is very worrying.”

      The Independent previously revealed that asylum seekers will have less living space than an average parking bay on the Bibby Stockholm, which saw at least one person die and reports of rape and abuse on board when it was used by the Dutch government to detain migrants in the 2000s.

      An official brochure released by owner Bibby Marine shows there are only 222 “single en-suite bedrooms” on board, meaning that at least two people must be crammed into every cabin for the government to achieve its aim of holding 500 people.

      Dorset Council has said it still had “serious reservations about the appropriateness of Portland Port in this scenario and remains opposed to the proposals”.

      The Conservative police and crime commissioner for Dorset is demanding extra government funding for the local force to “meet the extra policing needs that this project will entail”.

      A multi-agency forum including representatives from national, regional and local public sector agencies has been looking at plans for the provision of health services, the safety and security of both asylum seekers and local residents and charity involvement.

      Portland Port said it had been working with the Home Office and local agencies to ensure the safe arrival and operation of the Bibby Stockholm, and to minimise its impact locally.

      The barge is part of a wider government push to move migrants out of hotels, which are currently housing more than 47,000 asylum seekers at a cost of £6m a day.

      But the use of ships as accommodation was previously ruled out on cost grounds by the Treasury, when Rishi Sunak was chancellor, and the government has not confirmed how much it will be spending on the scheme.

      Ministers have also identified several former military and government sites, including two defunct airbases and an empty prison, that they want to transform into asylum accommodation.

      But a court battle with Braintree District Council over former RAF Wethersfield is ongoing, and legal action has also been threatened over similar plans for RAF Scampton in Lancashire.

      Last month, a barrister representing home secretary Suella Braverman told the High Court that 56,000 people were expected to arrive on small boats in 2023 and that some could be made homeless if hotel places are not found.

      A record backlog of asylum applications, driven by the increase in Channel crossings and a collapse in Home Office decision-making, mean the government is having to provide accommodation for longer while claims are considered.

      https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/barge-falmouth-cornwall-migrants-bibby-b2333313.html
      #barge #bateau

    • ‘Performative cruelty’ : the hostile architecture of the UK government’s migrant barge

      The arrival of the Bibby Stockholm barge at Portland Port, in Dorset, on July 18 2023, marks a new low in the UK government’s hostile immigration environment. The vessel is set to accommodate over 500 asylum seekers. This, the Home Office argues, will benefit British taxpayers and local residents.

      The barge, however, was immediately rejected by the local population and Dorset council. Several British charities and church groups have condemned the barge, and the illegal migration bill it accompanies, as “an affront to human dignity”.

      Anti-immigration groups have also protested against the barge, with some adopting offensive language, referring to the asylum seekers who will be hosted there as “bargies”. Conservative MP for South Dorset Richard Drax has claimed that hosting migrants at sea would exacerbate tenfold the issues that have arisen in hotels to date, namely sexual assaults, children disappearing and local residents protesting.

      My research shows that facilities built to house irregular migrants in Europe and beyond create a temporary infrastructure designed to be hostile. Governments thereby effectively make asylum seekers more displaceable while ignoring their everyday spatial and social needs.
      Precarious space

      The official brochure plans for the Bibby Stockholm show 222 single bedrooms over three stories, built around two small internal courtyards. It has now been retrofitted with bunk beds to host more than 500 single men – more than double the number it was designed to host.

      Journalists Lizzie Dearden and Martha McHardy have shown this means the asylum seekers housed there – for up to nine months – will have “less living space than an average parking bay”. This stands in contravention of international standards of a minimum 4.5m² of covered living space per person in cold climates, where more time is spent indoors.

      In an open letter, dated June 15 2023 and addressed to home secretary Suella Braverman, over 700 people and nearly 100 non-governmental organisations (NGOs) voiced concerns that this will only add to the trauma migrants have already experienced:

      Housing people on a sea barge – which we argue is equal to a floating prison – is morally indefensible, and threatens to retraumatise a group of already vulnerable people.

      Locals are concerned already overstretched services in Portland, including GP practices, will not be able to cope with further pressure. West Dorset MP Chris Lode has questioned whether the barge itself is safe “to cope with double the weight that it was designed to bear”. A caller to the LBC radio station, meanwhile, has voiced concerns over the vessel’s very narrow and low fire escape routes, saying: “What they [the government] are effectively doing here is creating a potential Grenfell on water, a floating coffin.”

      Such fears are not unfounded. There have been several cases of fires destroying migrant camps in Europe, from the Grand-Synthe camp near Dunkirk in France, in 2017, to the 2020 fire at the Moria camp in Greece. The difficulty of escaping a vessel at sea could turn it into a death trap.

      Performative hostility

      Research on migrant accommodation shows that being able to inhabit a place – even temporarily – and develop feelings of attachment and belonging, is crucial to a person’s wellbeing. Even amid ever tighter border controls, migrants in Europe, who can be described as “stuck on the move”, nonetheless still attempt to inhabit their temporary spaces and form such connections.

      However, designs can hamper such efforts when they concentrate asylum seekers in inhospitable, cut-off spaces. In 2015, Berlin officials began temporarily housing refugees in the former Tempelhof airport, a noisy, alienating industrial space, lacking in privacy and disconnected from the city. Many people ended up staying there for the better part of a year.

      French authorities, meanwhile, opened the Centre Humanitaire Paris-Nord in Paris in 2016, temporary migrant housing in a disused train depot. Nicknamed la Bulle (the bubble) for its bulbous inflatable covering, this facility was noisy and claustrophobic, lacking in basic comforts.

      Like the barge in Portland Port, these facilities, placed in industrial sites, sit uncomfortably between hospitality and hostility. The barge will be fenced off, since the port is a secured zone, and access will be heavily restricted and controlled. The Home Office insists that the barge is not a floating prison, yet it is an unmistakably hostile space.

      Infrastructure for water and electricity will physically link the barge to shore. However, Dorset council has no jurisdiction at sea.

      The commercial agreement on the barge was signed between the Home Office and Portland Port, not the council. Since the vessel is positioned below the mean low water mark, it did not require planning permission.

      This makes the barge an island of sorts, where other rules apply, much like those islands in the Aegean sea and in the Pacific, on which Greece and Australia have respectively housed migrants.

      I have shown how facilities are often designed in this way not to give displaced people any agency, but, on the contrary, to objectify them. They heighten the instability migrants face, keeping them detached from local communities and constantly on the move.

      The government has presented the barge as a cheaper solution than the £6.8 million it is currently spending, daily, on housing asylum seekers in hotels. A recent report by two NGOs, Reclaim the Seas and One Life to Live, concludes, however, that it will save less than £10 a person a day. It could even prove more expensive than the hotel model.

      Sarah Teather, director of the Jesuit Refugee Service UK charity, has described the illegal migration bill as “performative cruelty”. Images of the barge which have flooded the news certainly meet that description too.

      However threatening these images might be, though, they will not stop desperate people from attempting to come to the UK to seek safety. Rather than deterring asylum seekers, the Bibby Stockholm is potentially creating another hazard to them and to their hosting communities.

      https://theconversation.com/performative-cruelty-the-hostile-architecture-of-the-uk-governments

      –---

      Point intéressant, lié à l’aménagement du territoire :

      “Since the vessel is positioned below the mean low water mark, it did not require planning permission”

      C’est un peu comme les #zones_frontalières qui ont été créées un peu partout en Europe (et pas que) pour que les Etats se débarassent des règles en vigueur (notamment le principe du non-refoulement). Voir cette métaliste, à laquelle j’ajoute aussi cet exemple :
      https://seenthis.net/messages/795053

      voir aussi :

      The circumstances at Portland Port are very different because where the barge is to be positioned is below the mean low water mark. This means that the barge is outside of our planning control and there is no requirement for planning permission from the council.

      https://news.dorsetcouncil.gov.uk/2023/07/18/leaders-comments-on-the-home-office-barge

      #hostile_architecture #architecture_hostile #dignité #espace #Portland #hostilité #hostilité_performative #île #infrastructure #extraterritorialité #extra-territorialité #prix #coût

    • Sur l’#histoire (notamment liées au commerce d’ #esclaves) de la Bibby Stockholm :

      Bibby Line, shipowners

      Information
      From Guide to the Records of Merseyside Maritime Museum, volume 1: Bibby Line. In 1807 John Bibby and John Highfield, Liverpool shipbrokers, began taking shares in ships, mainly Parkgate Dublin packets. By 1821 (the end of the partnership) they had vessels sailing to the Mediterranean and South America. In 1850 they expanded their Mediterranean and Black Sea interests by buying two steamers and by 1865 their fleet had increased to twenty three. The opening of the Suez Canal in 1869 severely affected their business and Frederick Leyland, their general manager, failed to persuade the family partners to diversify onto the Atlantic. Eventually, he bought them out in 1873. In 1889 the Bibby family revived its shipowning interests with a successful passenger cargo service to Burma. From 1893 it also began to carry British troops to overseas postings which remained a Bibby staple until 1962. The Burma service ended in 1971 and the company moved to new areas of shipowning including bulkers, gas tankers and accommodation barges. It still has its head office in Liverpool where most management records are held. The museum holds models of the Staffordshire (1929) and Oxfordshire (1955). For further details see the attached catalogue or contact The Archives Centre for a copy of the catalogue.

      The earliest records within the collection, the ships’ logs at B/BIBBY/1/1/1 - 1/1/3 show company vessels travelling between Europe and South America carrying cargoes that would have been produced on plantations using the labour of enslaved peoples or used within plantation and slave based economies. For example the vessel Thomas (B/BIBBY/1/1/1) carries a cargo of iron hoops for barrels to Brazil in 1812. The Mary Bibby on a voyage in 1825-1826 loads a cargo of sugar in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil to carry to Rotterdam. The log (B/BIBBY/1/1/3) records the use of ’negroes’ to work with the ship’s carpenter while the vessel is in port.

      In September 1980 the latest Bibby vessel to hold the name Derbyshire was lost with all hands in the South China Sea. This collection does not include records relating to that vessel or its sinking, apart from a copy ’Motor vessel ’Derbyshire’, 1976-80: in memoriam’ at reference B/BIBBY/3/2/1 (a copy is also available in The Archives Centre library collection at 340.DER). Information about the sinking and subsequent campaigning by the victims’ family can be found on the NML website and in the Life On Board gallery. The Archives Centre holds papers of Captain David Ramwell who assisted the Derbyshire Family Association at D/RAM and other smaller collections of related documents within the DX collection.

      https://www.liverpoolmuseums.org.uk/artifact/bibby-line-shipowners

      –—
      An Open Letter to #Bibby_Marine

      Links between your parent company #Bibby_Line_Group (#BLG) and the slave trade have repeatedly been made. If true, we appeal to you to consider what actions you might take in recompense.

      Bibby Marine’s modern slavery statement says that one of the company’s values is to “do the right thing”, and that you “strongly support the eradication of slavery, as well as the eradication of servitude, forced or compulsory labour and human trafficking”. These are admirable words.

      Meanwhile, your parent company’s website says that it is “family owned with a rich history”. Please will you clarify whether this rich history includes slaving voyages where ships were owned, and cargoes transported, by BLG’s founder John Bibby, six generations ago. The BLG website says that in 1807 (which is when slavery was abolished in Britain), “John Bibby began trading as a shipowner in Liverpool with his partner John Highfield”. John Bibby is listed as co-owner of three slaving ships, of which John Highfield co-owned two:

      In 1805, the Harmonie (co-owned by #John_Bibby and three others, including John Highfield) left Liverpool for a voyage which carried 250 captives purchased in West Central Africa and St Helena, delivering them to Cumingsberg in 1806 (see the SlaveVoyages database using Voyage ID 81732).
      In 1806, the Sally (co-owned by John Bibby and two others) left Liverpool for a voyage which transported 250 captives purchased in Bassa and delivered them to Barbados (see the SlaveVoyages database using Voyage ID 83481).
      In 1806, the Eagle (co-owned by John Bibby and four others, including John Highfield) left Liverpool for a voyage which transported 237 captives purchased in Cameroon and delivered them to Kingston in 1807 (see the SlaveVoyages database using Voyage ID 81106).

      The same and related claims were recently mentioned by Private Eye. They also appear in the story of Liverpool’s Calderstones Park [PDF] and on the website of National Museums Liverpool and in this blog post “Shenanigans in Shipping” (a detailed history of the BLG). They are also mentioned by Laurence Westgaph, a TV presenter specialising in Black British history and slavery and the author of Read The Signs: Street Names with a Connection to the Transatlantic Slave Trade and Abolition in Liverpool [PDF], published with the support of English Heritage, The City of Liverpool, Northwest Regional Development Agency, National Museums Liverpool and Liverpool Vision.

      While of course your public pledges on slavery underline that there is no possibility of there being any link between the activities of John Bibby and John Highfield in the early 1800s and your activities in 2023, we do believe that it is in the public interest to raise this connection, and to ask for a public expression of your categorical renunciation of the reported slave trade activities of Mr Bibby and Mr Highfield.

      https://www.refugeecouncil.org.uk/latest/news/an-open-letter-to-bibby-marine

      –-

      Très peu d’info sur John Bibby sur wikipedia :

      John Bibby (19 February 1775 – 17 July 1840) was the founder of the British Bibby Line shipping company. He was born in Eccleston, near Ormskirk, Lancashire. He was murdered on 17 July 1840 on his way home from dinner at a friend’s house in Kirkdale.[1]


      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Bibby_(businessman)

    • ‘Floating Prisons’: The 200-year-old family #business behind the Bibby Stockholm

      #Bibby_Line_Group_Limited is a UK company offering financial, marine and construction services to clients in at least 16 countries around the world. It recently made headlines after the government announced one of the firm’s vessels, Bibby Stockholm, would be used to accommodate asylum seekers on the Dorset coast.

      In tandem with plans to house migrants at surplus military sites, the move was heralded by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Home Secretary Suella Braverman as a way of mitigating the £6m-a-day cost of hotel accommodation amid the massive ongoing backlog of asylum claims, as well as deterring refugees from making the dangerous channel crossing to the UK. Several protests have been organised against the project already, while over ninety migrants’ rights groups and hundreds of individual campaigners have signed an open letter to the Home Secretary calling for the plans to be scrapped, describing the barge as a “floating prison.”

      Corporate Watch has researched into the Bibby Line Group’s operations and financial interests. We found that:

      - The Bibby Stockholm vessel was previously used as a floating detention centre in the Netherlands, where undercover reporting revealed violence, sexual exploitation and poor sanitation.

      – Bibby Line Group is more than 90% owned by members of the Bibby family, primarily through trusts. Its pre-tax profits for 2021 stood at almost £31m, which they upped to £35.5m by claiming generous tax credits and deferring a fair amount to the following year.

      - Management aboard the vessel will be overseen by an Australian business travel services company, Corporate Travel Management, who have previously had aspersions cast over the financial health of their operations and the integrity of their business practices.

      - Another beneficiary of the initiative is Langham Industries, a maritime and engineering company whose owners, the Langham family, have longstanding ties to right wing parties.

      Key Issues

      According to the Home Office, the Bibby Stockholm barge will be operational for at least 18 months, housing approximately 500 single adult men while their claims are processed, with “24/7 security in place on board, to minimise the disruption to local communities.” These measures appear to have been to dissuade opposition from the local Conservative council, who pushed for background checks on detainees and were reportedly even weighing legal action out of concern for a perceived threat of physical attacks from those housed onboard, as well as potential attacks from the far right against migrants held there.

      Local campaigners have taken aim at the initiative, noting in the open letter:

      “For many people seeking asylum arriving in the UK, the sea represents a site of significant trauma as they have been forced to cross it on one or more occasions. Housing people on a sea barge – which we argue is equal to a floating prison – is morally indefensible, and threatens to re-traumatise a group of already vulnerable people.”

      Technically, migrants on the barge will be able to leave the site. However, in reality they will be under significant levels of surveillance and cordoned off behind fences in the high security port area.

      If they leave, there is an expectation they will return by 11pm, and departure will be controlled by the authorities. According to the Home Office:

      “In order to ensure that migrants come and go in an orderly manner with as little impact as possible, buses will be provided to take those accommodated on the vessel from the port to local drop off points”.

      These drop off points are to be determined by the government, while being sited off the coast of Dorset means they will be isolated from centres of support and solidarity.

      Meanwhile, the government’s new Illegal Migration Bill is designed to provide a legal justification for the automatic detention of refugees crossing the Channel. If it passes, there’s a chance this might set the stage for a change in regime on the Bibby Stockholm – from that of an “accommodation centre” to a full-blown migrant prison.

      An initial release from the Home Office suggested the local voluntary sector would be engaged “to organise activities that keep occupied those being accommodated, potentially involved in local volunteering activity,” though they seemed to have changed the wording after critics said this would mean detainees could be effectively exploited for unpaid labour. It’s also been reported the vessel required modifications in order to increase capacity to the needed level, raising further concerns over cramped living conditions and a lack of privacy.

      Bibby Line Group has prior form in border profiteering. From 1994 to 1998, the Bibby Stockholm was used to house the homeless, some of whom were asylum seekers, in Hamburg, Germany. In 2005, it was used to detain asylum seekers in the Netherlands, which proved a cause of controversy at the time. Undercover reporting revealed a number of cases abuse on board, such as beatings and sexual exploitation, as well suicide attempts, routine strip searches, scabies and the death of an Algerian man who failed to receive timely medical care for a deteriorating heart condition. As the undercover security guard wrote:

      “The longer I work on the Bibby Stockholm, the more I worry about safety on the boat. Between exclusion and containment I encounter so many defects and feel so much tension among the prisoners that it no longer seems to be a question of whether things will get completely out of hand here, but when.”

      He went on:

      “I couldn’t stand the way prisoners were treated […] The staff become like that, because the whole culture there is like that. Inhuman. They do not see the residents as people with a history, but as numbers.”

      Discussions were also held in August 2017 over the possibility of using the vessel as accommodation for some 400 students in Galway, Ireland, amid the country’s housing crisis. Though the idea was eventually dropped for lack of mooring space and planning permission requirements, local students had voiced safety concerns over the “bizarre” and “unconventional” solution to a lack of rental opportunities.
      Corporate Travel Management & Langham Industries

      Although leased from Bibby Line Group, management aboard the Bibby Stockholm itself will be handled by #Corporate_Travel_Management (#CTM), a global travel company specialising in business travel services. The Australian-headquartered company also recently received a £100m contract for the provision of accommodation, travel, venue and ancillary booking services for the housing of Ukrainian refugees at local hotels and aboard cruise ships M/S Victoria and M/S Ambition. The British Red Cross warned earlier in May against continuing to house refugees on ships with “isolated” and “windowless” cabins, and said the scheme had left many “living in limbo.”

      Founded by CEO #Jamie_Pherous, CTM was targeted in 2018 by #VGI_Partners, a group of short-sellers, who identified more than 20 red flags concerning the company’s business interests. Most strikingly, the short-sellers said they’d attended CTM’s offices in Glasgow, Paris, Amsterdam, Stockholm and Switzerland. Finding no signs of business activity there, they said it was possible the firm had significantly overstated the scale of its operations. VGI Partners also claimed CTM’s cash flows didn’t seem to add up when set against the company’s reported growth, and that CTM hadn’t fully disclosed revisions they’d made to their annual revenue figures.

      Two years later, the short-sellers released a follow-up report, questioning how CTM had managed to report a drop in rewards granted for high sales numbers to travel agencies, when in fact their transaction turnover had grown during the same period. They also accused CTM of dressing up their debt balance to make their accounts look healthier.

      CTM denied VGI Partners’ allegations. In their response, they paraphrased a report by auditors EY, supposedly confirming there were no question marks over their business practices, though the report itself was never actually made public. They further claim VGI Partners, as short-sellers, had only released the reports in the hope of benefitting from uncertainty over CTM’s operations.

      Despite these troubles, CTM’s market standing improved drastically earlier this year, when it was announced the firm had secured contracts for the provision of travel services to the UK Home Office worth in excess of $3bn AUD (£1.6bn). These have been accompanied by further tenders with, among others, the National Audit Office, HS2, Cafcass, Serious Fraud Office, Office of National Statistics, HM Revenue & Customs, National Health Service, Ministry of Justice, Department of Education, Foreign Office, and the Equality and Human Rights Commission.

      The Home Office has not released any figures on the cost of either leasing or management services aboard Bibby Stockholm, though press reports have put the estimated price tag at more than £20,000 a day for charter and berthing alone. If accurate, this would put the overall expenditure for the 18-month period in which the vessel will operate as a detention centre at almost £11m, exclusive of actual detention centre management costs such as security, food and healthcare.

      Another beneficiary of the project are Portland Port’s owners, #Langham_Industries, a maritime and engineering company owned by the #Langham family. The family has long-running ties to right-wing parties. Langham Industries donated over £70,000 to the UK Independence Party from 2003 up until the 2016 Brexit referendum. In 2014, Langham Industries donated money to support the re-election campaign of former Clacton MP for UKIP Douglas Carswell, shortly after his defection from the Conservatives. #Catherine_Langham, a Tory parish councillor for Hilton in Dorset, has described herself as a Langham Industries director (although she is not listed on Companies House). In 2016 she was actively involved in local efforts to support the campaign to leave the European Union. The family holds a large estate in Dorset which it uses for its other line of business, winemaking.

      At present, there is no publicly available information on who will be providing security services aboard the Bibby Stockholm.

      Business Basics

      Bibby Line Group describes itself as “one of the UK’s oldest family owned businesses,” operating in “multiple countries, employing around 1,300 colleagues, and managing over £1 billion of funds.” Its head office is registered in Liverpool, with other headquarters in Scotland, Hong Kong, India, Singapore, Malaysia, France, Slovakia, Czechia, the Netherlands, Germany, Poland and Nigeria (see the appendix for more). The company’s primary sectors correspond to its three main UK subsidiaries:

      #Bibby_Financial_Services. A global provider of financial services. The firm provides loans to small- and medium-sized businesses engaged in business services, construction, manufacturing, transportation, export, recruitment and wholesale markets. This includes invoice financing, export and trade finance, and foreign exchanges. Overall, the subsidiary manages more than £6bn each year on behalf of some 9,000 clients across 300 different industry sectors, and in 2021 it brought in more than 50% of the group’s annual turnover.

      - #Bibby_Marine_Limited. Owner and operator of the Bibby WaveMaster fleet, a group of vessels specialising in the transport and accommodation of workers employed at remote locations, such as offshore oil and gas sites in the North Sea. Sometimes, as in the case of Chevron’s Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) project in Nigeria, the vessels are used as an alternative to hotels owing to a “a volatile project environment.” The fleet consists of 40 accommodation vessels similar in size to the Bibby Stockholm and a smaller number of service vessels, though the share of annual turnover pales compared to the group’s financial services operations, standing at just under 10% for 2021.

      - #Garic Ltd. Confined to construction, quarrying, airport, agriculture and transport sectors in the UK, the firm designs, manufactures and purchases plant equipment and machinery for sale or hire. Garic brought in around 14% of Bibby Line Group’s turnover in 2021.

      Prior to February 2021, Bibby Line Group also owned #Costcutter_Supermarkets_Group, before it was sold to #Bestway_Wholesale to maintain liquidity amid the Covid-19 pandemic. In their report for that year, the company’s directors also suggested grant funding from #MarRI-UK, an organisation facilitating innovation in maritime technologies and systems, had been important in preserving the firm’s position during the crisis.
      History

      The Bibby Line Group’s story begins in 1807, when Lancashire-born shipowner John Bibby began trading out of Liverpool with partner John Highfield. By the time of his death in 1840, murdered while returning home from dinner with a friend in Kirkdale, Bibby had struck out on his own and come to manage a fleet of more than 18 ships. The mysterious case of his death has never been solved, and the business was left to his sons John and James.

      Between 1891 and 1989, the company operated under the name #Bibby_Line_Limited. Its ships served as hospital and transport vessels during the First World War, as well as merchant cruisers, and the company’s entire fleet of 11 ships was requisitioned by the state in 1939.

      By 1970, the company had tripled its overseas earnings, branching into ‘factoring’, or invoice financing (converting unpaid invoices into cash for immediate use via short-term loans) in the early 1980s, before this aspect of the business was eventually spun off into Bibby Financial Services. The group acquired Garic Ltd in 2008, which currently operates four sites across the UK.

      People

      #Jonathan_Lewis has served as Bibby Line Group’s Managing and Executive Director since January 2021, prior to which he acted as the company’s Chief Financial and Strategy Officer since joining in 2019. Previously, Lewis worked as CFO for Imagination Technologies, a tech company specialising in semiconductors, and as head of supermarket Tesco’s mergers and acquisitions team. He was also a member of McKinsey’s European corporate finance practice, as well as an investment banker at Lazard. During his first year at the helm of Bibby’s operations, he was paid £748,000. Assuming his role at the head of the group’s operations, he replaced Paul Drescher, CBE, then a board member of the UK International Chamber of Commerce and a former president of the Confederation of British Industry.

      Bibby Line Group’s board also includes two immediate members of the Bibby family, Sir #Michael_James_Bibby, 3rd Bt. and his younger brother #Geoffrey_Bibby. Michael has acted as company chairman since 2020, before which he had occupied senior management roles in the company for 20 years. He also has external experience, including time at Unilever’s acquisitions, disposals and joint venture divisions, and now acts as president of the UK Chamber of Shipping, chairman of the Charities Trust, and chairman of the Institute of Family Business Research Foundation.

      Geoffrey has served as a non-executive director of the company since 2015, having previously worked as a managing director of Vast Visibility Ltd, a digital marketing and technology company. In 2021, the Bibby brothers received salaries of £125,000 and £56,000 respectively.

      The final member of the firm’s board is #David_Anderson, who has acted as non-executive director since 2012. A financier with 35 years experience in investment banking, he’s founder and CEO of EPL Advisory – which advises company boards on requirements and disclosure obligations of public markets – and chair of Creative Education Trust, a multi-academy trust comprising 17 schools. Anderson is also chairman at multinational ship broker Howe Robinson Partners, which recently auctioned off a superyacht seized from Dmitry Pumpyansky, after the sanctioned Russian businessman reneged on a €20.5m loan from JP Morgan. In 2021, Anderson’s salary stood at £55,000.

      Ownership

      Bibby Line Group’s annual report and accounts for 2021 state that more than 90% of the company is owned by members of the Bibby family, primarily through family trusts. These ownership structures, effectively entities allowing people to benefit from assets without being their registered legal owners, have long attracted staunch criticism from transparency advocates given the obscurity they afford means they often feature extensively in corruption, money laundering and tax abuse schemes.

      According to Companies House, the UK corporate registry, between 50% and 75% of Bibby Line Group’s shares and voting rights are owned by #Bibby_Family_Company_Limited, which also retains the right to appoint and remove members of the board. Directors of Bibby Family Company Limited include both the Bibby brothers, as well as a third sibling, #Peter_John_Bibby, who’s formally listed as the firm’s ‘ultimate beneficial owner’ (i.e. the person who ultimately profits from the company’s assets).

      Other people with comparable shares in Bibby Family Company Limited are #Mark_Rupert_Feeny, #Philip_Charles_Okell, and Lady #Christine_Maud_Bibby. Feeny’s occupation is listed as solicitor, with other interests in real estate management and a position on the board of the University of Liverpool Pension Fund Trustees Limited. Okell meanwhile appears as director of Okell Money Management Limited, a wealth management firm, while Lady Bibby, Michael and Geoffrey’s mother, appears as “retired playground supervisor.”

      Key Relationships

      Bibby Line Group runs an internal ‘Donate a Day’ volunteer program, enabling employees to take paid leave in order to “help causes they care about.” Specific charities colleagues have volunteered with, listed in the company’s Annual Review for 2021 to 2022, include:

      - The Hive Youth Zone. An award-winning charity for young people with disabilities, based in the Wirral.

      – The Whitechapel Centre. A leading homeless and housing charity in the Liverpool region, working with people sleeping rough, living in hostels, or struggling with their accommodation.

      - Let’s Play Project. Another charity specialising in after-school and holiday activities for young people with additional needs in the Banbury area.

      - Whitdale House. A care home for the elderly, based in Whitburn, West Lothian and run by the local council.

      – DEBRA. An Irish charity set up in 1988 for individuals living with a rare, painful skin condition called epidermolysis bullosa, as well as their families.

      – Reaching Out Homeless Outreach. A non-profit providing resources and support to the homeless in Ireland.

      Various senior executives and associated actors at Bibby Line Group and its subsidiaries also have current and former ties to the following organisations:

      - UK Chamber of Shipping

      - Charities Trust

      - Institute of Family Business Research Foundation

      - Indefatigable Old Boys Association

      - Howe Robinson Partners

      - hibu Ltd

      - EPL Advisory

      - Creative Education Trust

      - Capita Health and Wellbeing Limited

      - The Ambassador Theatre Group Limited

      – Pilkington Plc

      – UK International Chamber of Commerce

      – Confederation of British Industry

      – Arkley Finance Limited (Weatherby’s Banking Group)

      – FastMarkets Ltd, Multiple Sclerosis Society

      – Early Music as Education

      – Liverpool Pension Fund Trustees Limited

      – Okell Money Management Limited

      Finances

      For the period ending 2021, Bibby Line Group’s total turnover stood at just under £260m, with a pre-tax profit of almost £31m – fairly healthy for a company providing maritime services during a global pandemic. Their post-tax profits in fact stood at £35.5m, an increase they would appear to have secured by claiming generous tax credits (£4.6m) and deferring a fair amount (£8.4m) to the following year.

      Judging by their last available statement on the firm’s profitability, Bibby’s directors seem fairly confident the company has adequate financing and resources to continue operations for the foreseeable future. They stress their February 2021 sale of Costcutter was an important step in securing this, given it provided additional liquidity during the pandemic, as well as the funding secured for R&D on fuel consumption by Bibby Marine’s fleet.
      Scandal Sheet

      Bibby Line Group and its subsidiaries have featured in a number of UK legal proceedings over the years, sometimes as defendants. One notable case is Godfrey v Bibby Line, a lawsuit brought against the company in 2019 after one of their former employees died as the result of an asbestos-related disease.

      In their claim, the executors of Alan Peter Godfrey’s estate maintained that between 1965 and 1972, he was repeatedly exposed to large amounts of asbestos while working on board various Bibby vessels. Although the link between the material and fatal lung conditions was established as early as 1930, they claimed that Bibby Line, among other things:

      “Failed to warn the deceased of the risk of contracting asbestos related disease or of the precautions to be taken in relation thereto;

      “Failed to heed or act upon the expert evidence available to them as to the best means of protecting their workers from danger from asbestos dust; [and]

      “Failed to take all reasonably practicable measures, either by securing adequate ventilation or by the provision and use of suitable respirators or otherwise, to prevent inhalation of dust.”

      The lawsuit, which claimed “unlimited damage”’ against the group, also stated that Mr Godfrey’s “condition deteriorated rapidly with worsening pain and debility,” and that he was “completely dependent upon others for his needs by the last weeks of his life.” There is no publicly available information on how the matter was concluded.

      In 2017, Bibby Line Limited also featured in a leak of more than 13.4 million financial records known as the Paradise Papers, specifically as a client of Appleby, which provided “offshore corporate services” such as legal and accountancy work. According to the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project, a global network of investigative media outlets, leaked Appleby documents revealed, among other things, “the ties between Russia and [Trump’s] billionaire commerce secretary, the secret dealings of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s chief fundraiser and the offshore interests of the Queen of England and more than 120 politicians around the world.”

      This would not appear to be the Bibby group’s only link to the shady world of offshore finance. Michael Bibby pops up as a treasurer for two shell companies registered in Panama, Minimar Transport S.A. and Vista Equities Inc.
      Looking Forward

      Much about the Bibby Stockholm saga remains to be seen. The exact cost of the initiative and who will be providing security services on board, are open questions. What’s clear however is that activists will continue to oppose the plans, with efforts to prevent the vessel sailing from Falmouth to its final docking in Portland scheduled to take place on 30th June.

      Appendix: Company Addresses

      HQ and general inquiries: 3rd Floor Walker House, Exchange Flags, Liverpool, United Kingdom, L2 3YL

      Tel: +44 (0) 151 708 8000

      Other offices, as of 2021:

      6, Shenton Way, #18-08A Oue Downtown 068809, Singapore

      1/1, The Exchange Building, 142 St. Vincent Street, Glasgow, G2 5LA, United Kingdom

      4th Floor Heather House, Heather Road, Sandyford, Dublin 18, Ireland

      Unit 2302, 23/F Jubilee Centre, 18 Fenwick Street, Wanchai, Hong Kong

      Unit 508, Fifth Floor, Metropolis Mall, MG Road, Gurugram, Haryana, 122002 India

      Suite 7E, Level 7, Menara Ansar, 65 Jalan Trus, 8000 Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

      160 Avenue Jean Jaures, CS 90404, 69364 Lyon Cedex, France

      Prievozská 4D, Block E, 13th Floor, Bratislava 821 09, Slovak Republic

      Hlinky 118, Brno, 603 00, Czech Republic

      Laan Van Diepenvoorde 5, 5582 LA, Waalre, Netherlands

      Hansaallee 249, 40549 Düsseldorf, Germany

      Poland Eurocentrum, Al. Jerozolimskie 134, 02-305 Warsaw, Poland

      1/2 Atarbekova str, 350062, Krasnodar, Krasnodar

      1 St Peter’s Square, Manchester, M2 3AE, United Kingdom

      25 Adeyemo Alakija Street, Victoria Island, Lagos, Nigeria

      10 Anson Road, #09-17 International Plaza, 079903 Singapore

      https://corporatewatch.org/floating-prisons-the-200-year-old-family-business-behind-the-bibby-s

      signalé ici aussi par @rezo:
      https://seenthis.net/messages/1010504

    • The Langham family seem quite happy to support right-wing political parties that are against immigration, while at the same time profiting handsomely from the misery of refugees who are forced to claim sanctuary here.


      https://twitter.com/PositiveActionH/status/1687817910364884992

      –---

      Family firm ’profiteering from misery’ by providing migrant barges donated £70k to #UKIP

      The Langham family, owners of Langham Industries, is now set to profit from an 18-month contract with the Home Office to let the Bibby Stockholm berth at Portland, Dorset

      A family firm that donated more than £70,000 to UKIP is “profiteering from misery” by hosting the Government’s controversial migrant barge. Langham Industries owns Portland Port, where the Bibby Stockholm is docked in a deal reported to be worth some £2.5million.

      The Langham family owns luxurious properties and has links to high-profile politicians, including Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Deputy Prime Minister Oliver Dowden. And we can reveal that their business made 19 donations to pro-Brexit party UKIP between 2003 and 2016.

      Late founder John Langham was described as an “avid supporter” of UKIP in an obituary in 2017. Now his children, John, Jill and Justin – all directors of the family firm – are set to profit from an 18-month contract with the Home Office to let the Bibby Stockholm berth at Portland, Dorset.

      While Portland Port refuses to reveal how much the Home Office is paying, its website cites berthing fees for a ship the size of the Bibby Stockholm at more than £4,000 a day. In 2011, Portland Port chairman John, 71, invested £3.7million in Grade II* listed country pile Steeple Manor at Wareham, Dorset. Dating to around 1600, it has a pond, tennis court and extensive gardens designed by the landscape architect Brenda Colvin.

      The arrangement to host the “prison-like” barge for housing migrants has led some locals to blast the Langhams, who have owned the port since 1997. Portland mayor Carralyn Parkes, 61, said: “I don’t know how John Langham will sleep at night in his luxurious home, with his tennis court and his fluffy bed, when asylum seekers are sleeping in tiny beds on the barge.

      “I went on the boat and measured the rooms with a tape measure. On average they are about 10ft by 12ft. The bunk bed mattresses are about 6ft long. If you’re taller than 6ft you’re stuffed. The Langham family need to have more humanity. They are only interested in making money. It’s shocking.”

      (#paywall)
      https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/family-firm-profiteering-misery-providing-30584405.amp

      #UK_Independence_Party

    • ‘This is a prison’: men tell of distressing conditions on Bibby Stockholm

      Asylum seekers share fears about Dorset barge becoming even more crowded, saying they already ‘despair and wish for death’

      Asylum seekers brought back to the Bibby Stockholm barge in Portland, Dorset, have said they are being treated in such a way that “we despair and wish for death”.

      The Guardian spoke to two men in their first interview since their return to the barge on 19 October after the vessel lay empty for more than two months. The presence of deadly legionella bacteria was confirmed on board on 7 August, the same day the first group of asylum seekers arrived. The barge was evacuated four days later.

      The new warning comes after it emerged that one asylum seeker attempted to kill himself and is in hospital after finding out he is due to be taken to the barge on Tuesday.

      A man currently on the barge told the Guardian: “Government decisions are turning healthy and normal refugees into mental patients whom they then hand over to society. Here, many people were healthy and coping with OK spirits, but as a result of the dysfunctional strategies of the government, they have suffered – and continue to suffer – from various forms of serious mental distress. We are treated in such a way that we despair and wish for death.”

      He said that although the asylum seekers were not detained on the barge and could leave to visit the nearby town, in practice, doing so was not easy.

      He added: “In the barge, we have exactly the feeling of being in prison. It is true that they say that this is not a prison and you can go outside at any time, but you can only go to specific stops at certain times by bus, and this does not give me a good feeling.

      “Even to use the fresh air, you have to go through the inspection every time and go to the small yard with high fences and go through the X-ray machine again. And this is not good for our health.

      “In short, this is a prison whose prisoners are not criminals, they are people who have fled their country just to save their lives and have taken shelter here to live.”

      The asylum seekers raised concerns about what conditions on the barge would be like if the Home Office did fill it with about 500 asylum seekers, as officials say is the plan. Those on board said it already felt quite full with about 70 people living there.

      The second asylum seeker said: “The space inside the barge is very small. It feels crowded in the dining hall and the small entertainment room. It is absolutely clear to me that there will be chaos here soon.

      “According to my estimate, as I look at the spaces around us, the capacity of this barge is maximum 120 people, including personnel and crew. The strategy of ​​transferring refugees from hotels to barges or ships or military installations is bound to fail.

      “The situation here on the barge is getting worse. Does the government have a plan for shipwrecked residents? Everyone here is going mad with anxiety. It is not just the barge that floats on the water, but the plans of the government that are radically adrift.”

      Maddie Harris of the NGO Humans For Rights Network, which supports asylum seekers in hotels, said: “Home Office policies directly contribute to the significant deterioration of the wellbeing and mental health of so many asylum seekers in their ‘care’, with a dehumanising environment, violent anti-migrant rhetoric and isolated accommodations away from community and lacking in support.”

      A Home Office spokesperson said: “The Bibby Stockholm is part of the government’s pledge to reduce the use of expensive hotels and bring forward alternative accommodation options which provide a more cost-effective, sustainable and manageable system for the UK taxpayer and local communities.

      “The health and welfare of asylum seekers remains the utmost priority. We work continually to ensure the needs and vulnerabilities of those residing in asylum accommodation are identified and considered, including those related to mental health and trauma.”

      Nadia Whittome and Lloyd Russell-Moyle, the Labour MPs for Nottingham East and Brighton Kemptown respectively, will travel to Portland on Monday to meet asylum seekers accommodated on the Bibby Stockholm barge and local community members.

      The visit follows the home secretary, Suella Braverman, not approving a visit from the MPs to assess living conditions as they requested through parliamentary channels.

      https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/oct/29/this-is-a-prison-men-tell-of-distressing-conditions-on-bibby-stockholm
      #prison #conditions_de_vie

  • Une place centrale de la ville nommée en l’honneur d’#Agota_Kristof

    Le Conseil communal va attribuer un nouveau nom à deux places encore anonymes : la place Agota Kristof au sud du collège latin, et la place de l’Escargot à l’extrémité de la rue de Bourgogne. La première entend rendre #hommage à une célèbre écrivaine et contribuer à représenter davantage les #femmes dans l’#espace_public : elle sera inaugurée en 2023. La deuxième, issue d’une démarche citoyenne, sera vernie lors de la fête de l’Association de quartier Draizes sans limite, le 27 août prochain.

    https://www.neuchatelville.ch/fr/medias/actualites/detail/une-place-centrale-de-la-ville-nommee-en-lhonneur-dagota-kristof
    #toponymie #toponymie_féministe #femmes #Neuchâtel #Suisse #noms_de_rue

  • Dedicato a chi rimpiange le statue degli schiavisti

    Il dibattito sui monumenti civici è appassionante. Ma il punto non è la riscrittura della storia quanto la contesa dello spazio pubblico. Dopo decenni di privatizzazioni.

    Da storico dell’arte trovo appassionante il dibattito che, in tutto l’Occidente, divampa intorno alle statue civiche. Il punto non è la riscrittura della storia, tantomeno la sua cancellazione (come vorrebbe la vulgata di destra che lo condanna): il vero oggetto di contesa è lo spazio pubblico come luogo in cui una comunità civile costruisce se stessa attraverso un giudizio sul passato e indica una via verso il futuro.

    È commovente che questo accada dopo decenni di privatizzazioni selvagge che tendono a far letteralmente sparire, in tutto il mondo, il concetto stesso di spazio pubblico. Si dovrà convenire che tenere (letteralmente) su un piedistallo nella piazza (centro della polis e dunque luogo politico per eccellenza) un personaggio, significa indicarlo come modello di virtù civili. È l’equivalente civile della santificazione: “Guardatelo, prendetelo a esempio, fate come lui”. La statua che vedete nella fotografia in questa pagina raffigura Edward Colston (1636-1721) ricco magnate della Bristol dell’età barocca, fondatore di scuole e filantropo: “Uno dei più virtuosi e saggi figli della città”, lo celebrava l’iscrizione sul basamento dell’opera che lo raffigura. Ma questo sant’uomo era uno dei più terribili schiavisti dell’età moderna: le sue navi trasportarono dalle coste africane all’America almeno 100mila persone rapite ai loro villaggi e ai loro affetti. Non meno di 20mila morirono durante le disumane traversate oceaniche.

    Ebbene, il 7 giugno 2020, l’onda lunga delle manifestazioni per la dignità della vita dei neri suscitata dall’uccisione di George Floyd a Minneapolis, ha travolto anche Edward Colston: la statua è stata abbattuta, mutilata, dileggiata e infine gettata in acqua a furor di popolo. Non ci nascondiamo dietro un dito: se masse oppresse in tutto l’Occidente non riescono a condividere la saggia svolta contro il vandalismo compiuta dalla Rivoluzione trionfante, è appunto perché sono tuttora oppresse e sconfitte. Negli ultimi vent’anni a Bristol si era aperto un duro confronto su questa statua: una petizione per la sua rimozione aveva raccolto 11mila firme, ma le autorità si sono opposte financo all’apposizione di una targa che facesse conoscere al pubblico le ombre della vita di quell’uomo vissuto quasi quattrocento anni fa. Eppure, numerose installazioni spontanee avevano reso visibile intorno alla figura bronzea di Colston l’immane tragedia che egli provocò. La notte del 18 ottobre 2018 (Giornata europea della tratta contro gli esseri umani), apparve intorno alla statua un’installazione artistica che presentava una serie di figurine di cemento giacenti a terra. Erano disposte secondo la pianta di una delle navi negriere in cui gli schiavisti come Colston trasportavano le persone in America.

    A lato dell’installazione erano presenti i nomi delle professioni odierne a rischio di schiavitù moderne: dagli addetti all’autolavaggio ai domestici, ai raccoglitori di frutta. Un eccellente esempio di risemantizzazione. L’artista Banksy ne ha proposto un altro: “Ecco un’idea che si rivolge sia a chi sente la mancanza della statua di Colston sia a chi non la sente -scrive Banksy ai suoi 9,4 milioni di follower su Instagram-. Lo tiriamo fuori dall’acqua, lo rimettiamo sul piedistallo, gli mettiamo un cavo attorno al collo e facciamo realizzare alcune statue di bronzo a grandezza naturale di manifestanti nell’atto di tirarlo giù. Tutti contenti. Un giorno straordinario commemorato”. Non sarebbe una cattiva idea.

    https://altreconomia.it/dedicato-a-chi-rimpiange-le-statue-degli-schiavisti

    #monument #monuments #statue #esclavage #toponymie_politique
    #espace_public #Edward_Colston #Colston
    ping @cede

  • Pour ma prochaine visite à Londres
    https://onpk.net/index.php/2023/03/21/857-pour-ma-prochaine-visite-a-londres

    J’ai eu - un jour - l’ambition de calculer la demi-vie touristique d’une ville. Le principe en aurait été simple : acheter le guide du routard (ou le guide vert) de chaque année depuis son lancement et explorer le nombre de nouveaux lieux avec 1, 2 et 3 étoiles. La High Line de New York était...

    #Espace_urbain

  • L’égalité sous conditions
    https://metropolitiques.eu/L-egalite-sous-conditions.html

    Le premier épisode de l’émission « Le genre en ville » questionne la mise en œuvre du principe républicain d’égalité en France. La politiste Réjane Sénac souligne comment son application se fait « sous conditions », sans réussir à endiguer les inégalités et les dominations de genre. Émission : Le genre en ville Le troisième terme de la devise républicaine, la « fraternité », loin d’être accessoire dit « à qui » les principes républicains de liberté et d’égalité sont appliqués. Symbole d’une fausse neutralité, la #Podcasts

    / égalité, #mobilisation, #espace

    #égalité

  • Les Vingt-Sept prêts à renforcer la chasse aux #migrants. Ils ont appelé au renforcement « immédiat » des mesures.

    La plupart des pays d’#Europe orientale, mais aussi l’#Autriche ou le #Danemark, demandent que les fonds européens puissent financer le déploiement de ces barrières physiques. On en compte déjà sur plus 2.000 km aux #frontières de l’#UE.

    Une grande victoire pour les héritiers du fascisme :

    Le compromis trouvé par les Vingt-Sept convient aussi à l’#Italie. « Je suis très contente des résultats obtenus », a assuré #Giorgia_Meloni, évoquant « une grande victoire pour l’Italie ».

    (Les Échos)

    #immigration #immigration_illégale #flux_migratoires #espace_Schengen #réglementation #stigmatisation

    • Europe : entente contre les migrants

      Tous les chefs d’État de l’Union européenne se sont entendus, au cours du sommet du vendredi 10 février, pour renforcer la #lutte_contre_l’immigration.

      De nouvelles #clôtures aux frontières de l’UE et entre pays de l’UE vont être construites et financées par l’Europe.

      2 000 km de #murs ou de #barbelés sont déjà en place dans douze pays de l’Union, comme en Espagne, à la frontière avec le Maroc, en Bulgarie, pour bloquer les migrants venant de Turquie, et même en France, à Calais, pour les empêcher de rejoindre l’Angleterre. La barrière la plus longue fait 500 km. Elle est située entre la Lituanie et la Biélorussie.

      Officiellement, la France et l’Allemagne sont opposées au financement des murs et des clôtures par l’UE. C’est pourquoi la déclaration finale ne les mentionne pas. Mais elle parle de restreindre les visas ou de faire pression sur les pays d’où sont originaires les migrants, au travers de l’aide au développement par exemple, pour qu’ils bloquent leurs ressortissants. Et puis, si les murs ne seront pas financés, les « clôtures mobiles », les tours de guet et les véhicules de surveillance, le seront ! Ce n’est qu’une question de sémantique. De la part des dirigeants européens, c’est surtout une posture hypocrite. Car c’est la domination des grandes puissances aux quatre coins du monde qui est responsable de bien des guerres et de la misère qui poussent des femmes et des hommes à tout quitter pour espérer vivre mieux dans un pays « riche ».

      Cette déclaration de l’Union européenne qui appelle au renforcement immédiat des mesures contre les migrants montre quel avenir se profile. L’Europe d’aujourd’hui fait de plus en plus penser à celle des années 1930 où les prétendues démocraties, comme la France, côtoyaient les dictatures fascistes comme celles de Hitler et de Mussolini et s’entendaient avec elles pour faire des migrants de l’époque, souvent les Juifs, les parias du continent. Ceux qui fuyaient l’Allemagne ou l’Autriche devenues nazies ne trouvaient pas de refuge : ni en France ni aux États-Unis. Les visas n’étaient plus délivrés. Les quotas d’immigration, dérisoires, étaient dépassés. Beaucoup de migrants étaient renvoyés dans leur pays d’origine où ils risquaient la mort, tout comme c’est souvent le cas aujourd’hui.

      https://journal.lutte-ouvriere.org/2023/02/15/europe-entente-contre-les-migrants_504988.html

      #barbarie

  • En Norvège, des #grands_ensembles attentifs aux #enfants
    https://metropolitiques.eu/En-Norvege-des-grands-ensembles-attentifs-aux-enfants.html

    Comment les villes peuvent-elles se mettre « à hauteur d’enfant » ? Grégoire Tortosa montre comment des grands ensembles situés à Oslo et Tromsø, avant-gardistes à leur manière, ont été pensés pour favoriser le #jeu libre des enfants. Le Mouvement moderne dessine une nouvelle conception de la ville à partir des années 1920. En proposant un « ensemble cohérent de principes de raisonnement reconnus et utilisés comme référence », il s’érige en paradigme urbain (Héran 2015, p. 33), dont le fonctionnalisme, le #Terrains

    / #aménagement, enfants, #voiture, #espace_public, grands ensembles, jeu, #Norvège

    https://metropolitiques.eu/IMG/pdf/met-tortosa.pdf

  • Our digital public squares aren’t so healthy. Can we fix that ? | Salon.com
    https://www.salon.com/2023/01/28/our-digital-public-squares-arent-so-healthy-can-we-fix-that

    Despite living in a hyper-connected world, rates of loneliness and depression are higher than ever. We know a great deal about how to design our physical spaces to encourage community connections – libraries, town parks, and adult education centers – but we are just scratching the surface in figuring out how to strengthen social connections and build civic engagement in our online spaces. Can we translate these real world designs into our online platforms to bolster our communities and our democracy?

    Digital pioneers are demonstrating the value that online spaces can provide in fostering community and social cohesion. Some of these groups are not new, like Black Twitter, but are finding ways to survive, and even thrive, within larger toxic social media platforms. Others, like gift sharing communities, are working out exit strategies from traditional social media sites because they have found these structures are overly focused on profit over public interest. Still other pioneers are growing their own platforms to ensure a design that emphasizes local community values.

    Ethan Zuckerman, from the Institute for Digital Public Infrastructure, points out that in addressing issues of misinformation and vitriol online we may be too focused on trying to fix our old social media platforms. Instead, we should focus on creating new spaces that have explicit civic goals and are designed for equity and social cohesion. Real-world communities need to be involved in intentionally designing their own local digital public spaces rather than leaving this work to global tech companies.

    People have found ways to thrive on Black Twitter, but being on Twitter is not without its challenges. Platformed racism is the result of a design ethos in Silicon Valley that applauds a hands-off philosophy to support innovation and growth. Outsiders sometimes jump on Black Twitter hashtags and post racist comments and there are reports of police gathering information from Black Twitter. Trolls, cancel culture, and harassment can make Twitter a traumatizing place for many people. Algorithms designed to drive engagement end up promoting offensive content. Community guidelines addressing negative behavior are under-enforced and with Elon Musk’s tenure the hands-off philosophy has shot through the roof and further escalated vitriol and misinformation on the platform.

    Twitter’s design encourages simplicity, impulsivity and incivility. It cues emotional thinking rather than encouraging us to analyze content or re-consider making a post. But, despite its design flaws, small private groups have also emerged on Twitter and have been able to thrive by blocking trolls and curating feeds to minimize the toxicity that is built into the platform. Private student groups on Twitter, such as those that started among friends who attended Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU), continue after graduation to provide community and networking. Both the larger Black Twitter public space and the small private groups provide members with valuable support and shared experiences, despite the design of Twitter, not because of it.

    The Buy Nothing Project is an early model of how to build a value-based platform with a hyper-local focus. Their biggest challenge has been trying to promote values from within a system that runs counter to those values. The design of Facebook actively encourages people to stay online and join more groups. Many Facebook private groups are wonderful — groups that support cancer patients, new Moms, church youth groups — but the platform’s focus on growth and keeping people online, rather than fostering better social cohesion and improving our offline lives, sets the wrong tone.

    Buy Nothing has now created its own app to better foster community as it transitions off of Facebook. They have found that size matters and small is better in order to limit posting and emphasize real world connections. Size also impacted feelings of safety as real-life local connections became more difficult when local groups got too big. The infrastructure of Facebook made it difficult to limit group size and to draw flexible boundaries around neighborhoods to connect diverse groups while keeping it local.

    Tiens, Front Porch (Vermont) me fait penser aux raisons du succès de Biblio-fr dans les années 1990-2000

    Facebook is opaque about how it addresses harmful content and how its algorithms are designed. Content is posted immediately. With 4.75 billion posts shared daily it is impossible to track and remove users who are engaged in selling drugs, child pornography, and spreading misinformation. On Front Porch, posts are first reviewed by paid human moderators and then posted. If someone behaves badly, such as writing insults about a neighbor, that person is contacted and the guidelines are explained: Neighbors can disagree with something someone has posted and voice their opinion, but personal attacks are not allowed. The design of Front Porch prevents illegal activities from being posted. It may be that what works for many towns across Vermont may not be the best design for those in Nevada or New York City, but this type of locally based platform could be modified to accommodate different community values.

    Third places are places outside of our homes and workplaces that provide essential neutral places where we can relax, interact with friends and strangers and enjoy ourselves. Ray Oldenburg first described third places decades ago, at a time when people were moving to the suburbs and third places were disappearing. These informal community gathering places provide a sense of belonging and connection that can strengthen community ties. Libraries, gyms, and cafes can be accessible to everyone and conversation and community building, rather than solely pursuing commerce, are top priorities.

    Sociologist Eric Klinenberg’s book Palaces for the People, traces the importance of public squares throughout history. These “palaces” can offer neutral spaces where everyone is welcome. Klinenberg argues that the future of democratic society rests on developing shared values and shared spaces. These spaces provide connections where people can linger and make friends across group lines and are intentionally designed to promote socialization and connection.

    Tech companies maintain that they cannot moderate online communities because that would jeopardize our right to free speech and because there is simply too much content flying across these networks to track. Both these issues are false flags. We now know that the core infrastructure of these platforms is intentionally designed to amplify vitriol and misinformation because this increases engagement, keeps us online longer, and provides tech companies with billions of dollars from ad revenue. It doesn’t have to be this way.

    #Espaces_publics #Médias_sociaux #relations #Bien_être