C’est marrant, quand Libération applique son paywall, il laisse le texte de l’article, mais il en retire toutes les voyelles.
-
-
Disemvoweling - Wikipedia
▻https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisemvowelingBecause #disemvoweling makes text legible only through significant cognitive effort[citation needed], it is used by moderators on internet forums, newsgroups and blogs as a way to limit the effectiveness of unwanted postings or comments, such as rudeness or criticism. Disemvoweling maintains some transparency, both of the act and the underlying word, which would not be the case if the entire offending post is deleted. The word disemvoweling is a portmanteau combining vowel and disembowel.[1]
-
-
En Chine ça commence…
China ‘beefs up’ social media rules by forcing people to use real-name registration | South China Morning Post
▻http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1679072/china-beefs-social-media-rules-forcing-people-use-real-name-registrationforcing people to register with their real names if they want to use the mainland’s most popular Twitter-like service, Sina Weibo, internet forums, and other websites.
The nation’s Cyberspace Administration did not reveal details about how the plan would be carried out in today’s announcement. (...)
The real-name protocol means that even if a user is able to choose an internet nickname, he or she would need to register their real names with the website administrator.
ailleurs ça continue plus ou moins…
Facebook Changes Real-Name Policy After Uproar From Drag Queens - WSJ
▻http://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-changes-real-name-policy-after-uproar-from-drag-queens-1412223040Mr. Cox said in his post that the drag-queen controversy can be traced to a single Facebook user who reported several hundred drag queens to Facebook, claiming the accounts were fake. Mr. Cox said 99% of accounts flagged in that way by other users are “bad actors doing bad things: impersonation, bullying, trolling, domestic violence, scams, hate speech and more.”
#real_name #rézosocios #facebook #chine via @mb
-
Egyptian jihadi group denies leader’s killing
▻http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/egyptian-jihadi-group-denies-death-leaderEgyptian jihadi group #Ansar_Beit_al-Maqdis denied Sunday that its leader has been killed, after security sources said the group’s commander Shadi al-Menei had been shot dead in an ambush. The group also denied Menei was its leader, in a statement published on Islamist militant Internet forums accompanied by a picture of him reading a report about his “death” on a laptop. The picture could not be immediately authenticated. read more
-
Pour ou contre la modération à priori des forums ?
Edward Tufte forum : Moderating internet forums : What’s smart, not what’s new
▻http://www.edwardtufte.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=0000fTA rejection slip from a Chinese economics journal supposedly went this way (quoted in the Financial Times): “We have read your manuscript with boundless delight. If we were to publish your paper, it would be impossible for us to publish any work of lower standard. And as it is unthinkable that in the next thousand years we shall see its equal, we are, to our regret, compelled to return your divine composition, and to beg you a thousand times to overlook our short sight and timidity.”
Après ce petit bijou chinois, Tufte, qui est donc pour, explique qu’il ne faut publier que les commentaires excellents, constructifs, etc, et ne jamais s’expliquer sur les raisons de « non publication » d’un message particulier :
Publishers have no obligation to publish, acknowledge, or reply to the thousands of unsolicited contributions that they receive. Life’s too short.
Every day we receive partially meritorious contributions that are not published; even some of the contributions of our Kindly Contributors are not published. There are billions of other places on the internet where rejected contributions can be published, unreviewed and unedited. But not here.
Ce modèle me paraît très bien ; j’ajouterais tout de même qu’il serait alors gentil d’envoyer à l’auteur du commentaire une copie par email de son propre message (avec pourquoi pas une phrase+lien sur la politique de modération).
-
Si le message est censuré sur la base d’une phrase malheureuse mais que le reste est valable ça peut valoir le coup en effet. La modération des commentaires permet d’augmenter significativement la qualité de ceux-ci.
-
-
Une fonctionnalité qui serait pas mal dans l’interface de modération des forums de #spip
-
Ce message de refus a tout l’air d’être une vieille légende. On le trouve à divers endroits (en dehors de Tufte, dont, au passage le système de commentaires est tout pourri, sans possibilité de liens directs ni mention de la date des commentaires…)
Une des plus anciennes — la première ? en tous cas, c’est Mark Seiden qui est le plus souvent crédité, lorsqu’il y a une référence — est dans Wired 1.02, soit le numéro de mai-juin 1993…
▻http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/1.02/flux.html
The Ultimate Rejection: Wired contributor Mark Seiden came across this mother of all rejection slips from a Chinese economic journal while browsing the Net: “We have read your manuscript with boundless delight. If we were to publish your paper, it would be impossible for us to publish any work of lower standard. And as it is unthinkable that in the next thousand years we shall see its equal, we are, to our regret, compelled to return your divine composition, and to beg you a thousand times to overlook our short sight and timidity.”
On la trouve même dans le sermon du 30/08/1998 du pasteur d’une église presbytérienne près de Los Angeles, juste avant un passage de Marc Aurèle et le commentaire de l’épitre aux Romains…
▻http://mppres.org/sermons/1998/83098.htmApparemment, pour Gg, rien avant 1993.
-
-
-
-
Teen Hacker Banned From The Internet For Six Years | Techdirt
►http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20121109/16132820999/teen-hacker-banned-internet-six-years.shtmlA teenaged hacker known as Cosmo the God, who was involved in a number of big site takedowns earlier this year, and who is considered a “social engineering mastermind” has been sentenced to probation. The terms include a ban on internet access until his 21st birthday, six years from now (...) The #internet is so integrated into our lives these days that taking the internet out of your life is a lot more complicated than some might imagine.
-
Poland’s growing Palestine movement faces anti-Semitism smears | The Electronic Intifada
►http://electronicintifada.net/content/polands-growing-palestine-movement-faces-anti-semitism-smears/10597ZOOM withdrew from the coalition, labeling the Kampania Palestyna, a network of Polish and Polish-Palestinian activists with experience of solidarity work in Palestine, as “anti-Semitic.” Its statement of resignation has now been withdrawn from its website and other Internet forums, possibly due to the fear of litigation under Poland’s stringent slander laws.
