industryterm:online life

  • Russia considers ’unplugging’ from internet (https://www.bbc.com/ne...
    https://diasp.eu/p/8508348

    Russia considers ’unplugging’ from internet

    Russia may briefly disconnect from the internet as part of a test of its cyber-defences. Article word count: 623

    HN Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19135085 Posted by _void (karma: 73) Post stats: Points: 114 - Comments: 85 - 2019-02-11T15:29:23Z

    #HackerNews #considers #from #internet #russia #unplugging

    Article content:

    [1]Vladimir Putin Image copyright Reuters Image caption The net independence plan is seen as a way for Russiaʼs government to get more control over online life

    Russia is considering whether to disconnect from the global internet briefly, as part of a test of its cyber-defences.

    The test will mean data passing between Russian citizens and organisations stays inside the nation rather than (...)

  • 5 Online Life Hacks to Help You Unwind
    https://hackernoon.com/5-online-life-hacks-to-help-you-unwind-9d7a9aaa13b1?source=rss----3a8144

    Life can be rough, which means you need to kick back and take a load off from time to time if you want to keep your sanity. But instead of unplugging, you can use the tools of the trade to get yourself into a calmer and more relaxed state. These 5 online life hacks will help you leverage the newest and best technologies so that you can unwind in style.Provide Self-Service WiFi to Guests with QR Code-Based QifiWant to have friends over for a good old-fashioned hangout but don’t want to have to configure every single mobile device they bring with them? Get your guests on your Wi-Fi without lifting a finger with a custom-made QR code that your guests can scan to receive your SSID and key information themselves.Using a site like Qifi makes it both safe and easy to generate QR codes for (...)

    #online-life-hacks #qr-code #free-wifi #lifehacks #help-you-unwind

  • The Internet Is Dying. Repealing Net Neutrality Hastens That Death. - The New York Times
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/29/technology/internet-dying-repeal-net-neutrality.html

    Because net neutrality shelters start-ups — which can’t easily pay for fast-line access — from internet giants that can pay, the rules are just about the last bulwark against the complete corporate takeover of much of online life. When the rules go, the internet will still work, but it will look like and feel like something else altogether — a network in which business development deals, rather than innovation, determine what you experience, a network that feels much more like cable TV than the technological Wild West that gave you Napster and Netflix.

    If this sounds alarmist, consider that the state of digital competition is already pretty sorry. As I’ve argued regularly, much of the tech industry is at risk of getting swallowed by giants. Today’s internet is lousy with gatekeepers, tollbooths and monopolists.

    The five most valuable American companies — Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google and Microsoft — control much of the online infrastructure, from app stores to operating systems to cloud storage to nearly all of the online ad business. A handful of broadband companies — AT&T, Charter, Comcast and Verizon, many of which are also aiming to become content companies, because why not — provide virtually all the internet connections to American homes and smartphones.

    Together these giants have carved the internet into a historically profitable system of fiefs. They have turned a network whose very promise was endless innovation into one stuck in mud, where every start-up is at the tender mercy of some of the largest corporations on the planet.

    This was not the way the internet was supposed to go. At its deepest technical level, the internet was designed to avoid the central points of control that now command it. The technical scheme arose from an even deeper philosophy. The designers of the internet understood that communications networks gain new powers through their end nodes — that is, through the new devices and services that plug into the network, rather than the computers that manage traffic on the network. This is known as the “end-to-end” principle of network design, and it basically explains why the internet led to so many more innovations than the centralized networks that came before it, such as the old telephone network.

    But if flexibility was the early internet’s promise, it was soon imperiled. In 2003, Tim Wu, a law professor now at Columbia Law School (he’s also a contributor to The New York Times), saw signs of impending corporate control over the growing internet. Broadband companies that were investing great sums to roll out faster and faster internet service to Americans were becoming wary of running an anything-goes network.

    To Mr. Wu, the broadband monopolies looked like a threat to the end-to-end idea that had powered the internet. In a legal journal, he outlined an idea for regulation to preserve the internet’s equal-opportunity design — and hence was born “net neutrality.”

    Though it has been through a barrage of legal challenges and resurrections, some form of net neutrality has been the governing regime on the internet since 2005. The new F.C.C. order would undo the idea completely; companies would be allowed to block or demand payment for certain traffic as they liked, as long as they disclosed the arrangements.

    But look, you might say: Despite the hand-wringing, the internet has kept on trucking. Start-ups are still getting funded and going public. Crazy new things still sometimes get invented and defy all expectations; Bitcoin, which is as Wild West as they come, just hit $10,000 on some exchanges.

    Well, O.K. But a vibrant network doesn’t die all at once. It takes time and neglect; it grows weaker by the day, but imperceptibly, so that one day we are living in a digital world controlled by giants and we come to regard the whole thing as normal.

    It’s not normal. It wasn’t always this way. The internet doesn’t have to be a corporate playground. That’s just the path we’ve chosen.

    #Neutralité_internet #Vectorialisme

  • NYTimes Channel on IFTTT - NYTimes.com
    http://open.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/12/nytimes-channel-on-ifttt/?_r=0

    Earlier today, an NYTimes channel was released on IFTTT, the service that makes it possible to “automate your online life.” It’s great to be able to offer NYTimes on IFTTT, but for the technology team at The Times, the most exciting part is that it was all done with our publicly available APIs.

    #Medialab #New_York_Times #IFTTT #réseaux