industryterm:settlement products

  • In first, Israel will penalize Amnesty International for anti-settlements campaign - Israel News - Haaretz.com

    http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.811892

    Israel plans to punish Amnesty International for its recent campaign, which encourages people to lobby companies and governments to boycott settlement products, by denying tax benefits to Israelis who donate to the human rights organization.
    It is the first time the government will apply the so-called anti-boycott law, which penalizes organizations and individuals calling for a boycott of Israel or the settlements. The controversial law was passed in 2011.
    Free daily newspaper Israel Hayom, which is widely seen as a mouthpiece of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, reported in its main story Tuesday that Finance Minister Moshe Kahlon has resolved to take action against Amnesty International for its summer campaign “Israel’s Occupation: 50 Years of Dispossession," marking the 50th anniversary of the occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem. The campaign urges people to call on foreign companies and governments to end their trade ties with the settlements.
    Haaretz has confirmed that representatives of the organization will be summoned to a hearing at the Finance Ministry. At press time, a spokesman for Kahlon did not respond to a request by Haaretz for comment.
    The campaign’s website states: “We want governments to stop enabling the economy that keeps these illegal settlements growing and fuels the suffering of Palestinians: and you can help.

    #Israel #Amnesty #settlements #colonies

  • German MPs Implore Netanyahu to Bury NGO ’Transparency’ Bill -
    Barak Ravid Dec 03, 2015
    http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.689735

    Four leading German legislators who head the German-Israeli Parliamentary Friendship Group in the Bundestag, and who represent Germany’s large parties, sent a letter to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Friday expressing their concern about a bill that would restrict the activities of left-wing NGOs in Israel.

    The four wrote that if the bill, being promoted by Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked, is passed, it would make it difficult for Israel’s friends in Germany to help Israel fend off boycotts and attempts at delegitimization, and asked Netanyahu to “rethink” the proposed legislation.
    (...) The four – friendship group chairman Volker Beck of the Greens Party, deputy chairwoman Gitta Connemann of the ruling Christian Democratic Party; deputy chairwoman Kerstin Griese of the Social Democratic Party, and Jan Korte of the Left Party – are considered the leaders of the campaign on Israel’s behalf in Germany. Only recently they protested to the Berlin-based KaDeWe department store when it removed settlement products from its shelves, which evidently was a factor in leading the store to reverse its decision.

    • Minister Shaked Defends NGOs ’Transparency’ Bill in Letter to German Lawmakers
      http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.689976

      States should use diplomatic channels to convey their concerns and not finance local civil groups, justice minister writes after German MPs implore Netanyahu to bury legislation targeting leftist Israeli non-profits.

      Barak Ravid Dec 04, 2015 8:26 AM

      Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked on Thursday wrote to the German-Israeli Parliamentary Friendship Group of the German Bundestag to defend the so-called “transparency” bill she is endorsing. She wrote that the bill, which would impose restrictions on leftist NGOs getting funding from abroad, is a necessity.

      Shaked stressed that the bill is needed due to the fear that non-profits will be used by foreign governments and organizations to influence its politics.

  • France supports labeling Israeli settlement products, opposes boycott
    Sept. 6, 2015 10:41 P.M
    http://www.maannews.com/Content.aspx?id=767472

    JERUSALEM (AFP) — French Economy Minister Emmanuel Macron said Sunday that while Paris backs EU plans to label products from Israeli settlements, it opposes any boycott of Israel.

    “The French and European diplomatic position is clear and has not changed and will not change,” he told reporters at the start of a two-day visit to Israel and the occupied Palestinian territory.

    Israel has sought to fight the labeling plan, claiming it is the target of an international delegitimization campaign.

    Macron said that France opposes campaigns such as that of the Palestinian-led Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign, which aims to put political and economic pressure on Israel over its occupation of the Palestinian territories.

    “We are against any practice such as that of the BDS,” he said.

  • Israel in drive to stop or delay EU labeling settlement products - Intensive diplomatic efforts underway to halt or at least postpone planned EU directive to label Israeli goods made in West Bank, East Jerusalem and Golan Heights.
    By Barak Ravid | Jun. 7, 2015 Haaretz Daily Newspaper |
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.659946

    Israel has launched intensive diplomatic efforts to try and stop, or at least postpone, a planned European Union directive to label goods that originate in West Bank settlements, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights, senior officials told Haaretz.

    The three officials, who asked not to be identified because of the diplomatic sensitivity, said the Foreign Ministry was leading the efforts through Israeli embassies in Europe, and especially through its mission to the EU in Brussels. According to the officials, the labeling of the products has been the main issue on the Foreign Ministry’s agenda over recent weeks.

    The diplomatic efforts began after the most recent meeting of the EU foreign ministers on May 18. After the meeting, the Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem received information that the EU’s foreign policy chief, Federica Mogherini, had told EU ministers she intended to press ahead on the process of labeling goods produced in the settlements and would publish directives soon.

    Although Mogherini did not say when she was going to publish the directives, the Foreign Ministry assessment was that it would happen within a few weeks of the meeting.

    “There is a reasonable possibility that the decision will be made even before summer vacation starts in Europe, in August,” one of the senior officials said.

    After the directives have been formulated, they will be presented to the European Commission – which is the executive body of the EU – for a vote, to give the document political weight.

    Over the past two weeks, Israel’s ambassador to the EU, David Walzer, and his deputy, Ronen Gil-Or, have been in contact with the 28 European commissioners who will apparently vote on labeling the products that are marketed in European grocery chains. Walzer and Gil-Or are focusing their efforts in particular on seven commissioners within whose purview the issue of labeling the products also falls.

    The Israeli diplomats are trying to persuade the commissioners to vote against the decision, or at least to postpone it as much as possible, arguing that the current timing is not suitable for such a decision.

    The Foreign Ministry hopes that if it is able to persuade at least four out of the seven relevant commissioners, the decision will at least be postponed.

    However, the Foreign Ministry believes it will be difficult, if not impossible, to stop or even delay the decision.

    A senior Israeli official said that during the talks in Brussels with Mogherini’s advisers, the latter made clear that the only way to delay a decision on labeling the products from the settlements would be if the peace process with the Palestinians was renewed, which is not on the horizon. “We are f***ed,” the senior officials said. “We will try to do all we can, but a miracle will have to happen.”

    A few days ago, Gil-Or spoke to the European Commission’s legal adviser to get a sense of how binding the new directives would be, if they are indeed published. The European official said the directives were not binding legislation, but would leave room for interpretation. However, the adviser added that the European Commission believed the directives would have a “high degree of impact” on the member states, and all 28 member states would toe the line.

    The concerns in Israel over the directives to label the products originating in the settlements are both economic and diplomatic. Economically, products produced in the settlements constitute only a small fraction of Israel’s exports to Europe. However, it is feared that many European grocery chains will find it difficult to differentiate between goods manufactured within the 1967 borders and those manufactured over the Green Line, and will therefore prefer to avoid selling Israeli products altogether.

    On the diplomatic level, there is concern over another serious blow to Israel’s status in Europe, and increased international pressure with regard to the settlements.

    In addition to the matter of labeling products from the settlements, the EU is taking steps also that would mean a complete boycott on some products from the settlements.

    Since the beginning of 2015, the EU has withdrawn its recognition of the Agriculture Ministry’s veterinary services across the Green Line. This has meant that, over recent months, the import of chicken and milk products from the settlements to Europe has been banned completely, because they are no longer approved as meeting European standards.

    And at the end of June, the EU will stop recognizing the Agriculture Ministry’s authority over the Green Line with regard to products that are defined as organic, such as eggs and produce. A senior Israeli official said that by the end of 2015, this ban could expand to products such as wine and cosmetics that are produced over the Green Line.

  • Seize ministres des Affaires Etrangères européens, dont ceux de la France et la Grande-Bretagne, appellent à étiqueter les produits provenant des colonies israéliennes .

    European FMs urge policy chief: Label West Bank settlement products - Diplomacy and Defense - Israel News | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/1.652113
    Sixteen out of 28 foreign ministers - including France and Britain - sign letter saying that Europeans must not be ’misled by false information,’ and must be aware if the origin of goods is from over the Green Line.

  • Catherine Ashton: Israeli settlement products to be labeled in EU by end of 2013
    By Barak Ravid
    Haaretz, 23rd of July
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.537315

    European Union foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton is seeking to draft comprehensive guidelines on labeling settlement products by the end of this year, she told several senior EU officials last week.

    She made the comment in a letter - a copy of which has been obtained by Haaretz - sent on July 8 to European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso and the seven commissioners responsible for justice, industry, consumer protection, agriculture, taxation, trade and internal market. The commission is the EU’s executive arm.

  • Israël/ Territoires palestiniens
    « Made in Israël » ou « Made dans les colonies des Territoires Occupés » ?

    Dûment reconnus comme étant produits ou fabriqués dans les colonies qu’Israël maintient dans les territoires palestiniens, les biens commercialisés avec l’Europe ne pourraient plus bénéficier des tarifs préférentiels habituellement accordés aux produits israéliens. La solution consistait donc à identifier, par leur étiquetage, les produits qui proviennent des colonies (illégales selon la jurisprudence européenne) et ceux qui arrivent d’Israël. L’Union européenne avait demandé à ses Etats membres de prendre les mesures nécessaires à cet étiquetage. Mais leur mise en œuvre vient d’être reportée, à la demande de Washington pour ne pas gêner les efforts de John Kerry, attelé à la relance du processus de paix entre Israéliens et Palestiniens. L’étiquetage a plusieurs effets : outre l’avantage fiscal qui disparaît pour les produits des colonies, il permet aux consommateurs européens d’acheter ou de ne pas acheter ces produits en toute connaissance de cause.

    Ashrawi slams EU decision to delay labeling settlement products
    Published Sunday 19/05/2013 (updated) 20/05/2013 18:41

    http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=597139

    BETHLEHEM (Ma’an) — PLO official Hanan Ashrawi on Sunday condemned the European Union’s decision to delay the labeling of settlement products following a request from US Secretary of State John Kerry.

    “This once again brings into question the American role in negotiations as a credible mediator,” Ashrawi said in a statement.
    “Rather than providing Israel with immunity, the Obama administration should act responsibly and promote prospects for a just peace and Palestinian self-determination and freedom.”
    The senior PLO official said the EU should go further than simply labeling settlement products by enforcing a “serious ban” on their sale.

    “The US has used the so-called peace process as an instrument of Israeli impunity; it is about time to end such a policy.”
    EU foreign ministers from 27 member states agreed over a year ago to enforce EU legislation and label products originating from illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank.

    On February 22, EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton called on EU foreign ministers to enforce legislation on labeling settlement goods and in April, 13 EU foreign ministers expressed support for the initiative, with the issue currently in discussion.
    US Secretary of State John Kerry and senior US officials reportedly asked Ashton to delay enforcement of the proposal, with the Americans saying that it would harm Kerry’s efforts to restart peace talks, Israeli daily Haaretz reported.

    A senior Israeli official told the Israeli daily that Israel had asked the US administration to intervene to delay the EU’s decision to follow through on labeling settlement products.

    The decision to label settlement goods will likely be delayed until June. “The EU decided to give Kerry the time he asked for and see whether the negotiations are resumed,” a European diplomat said, according to Haaretz.

  • Irish Foreign Minister plans to push for EU ban on settlement products
    Nov 09, 2012 11:06 am | Adam Horowitz

    Ireland will be taking over as President of the Council of the European Union at the beginning of 2013, and Haaretz reports it will use the position to push for an EU ban on settlement products:

    Ireland is planning to utilize its upcoming term as President of the Council of the European Union, which begins on January 1 2013, to advance efforts to achieve a joint decision between all 27 member states to ban products from West Bank Settlements.

    The Irish Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, Eamon Gilmore, revealed the plan in a letter to the chairman of the Irish parliament’s Joint Committee on Foreign Affairs and Trade (PDF).

    In a letter obtained by Haaretz, dated November 2, Gilmore wrote that during a meeting of EU foreign ministers in October, he declared that Ireland will give rise to discussions and support a comprehensive EU boycott of goods from settlements.

    In an interview with the Jerusalem Post Gilmore explains he supports the move on moral grounds:

    Ireland supports a ban on West Bank settlement products even though the European Union is unlikely to impose one, its Foreign Minister Eamon Gilmore stated.

    “Ireland would support a ban at EU level, and put it forward as an option the Council might consider,” Gilmore said.

    He wrote this opinion earlier this month in a letter to the Joint Committee on Foreign Affairs and Trade, the text of which was posted on the web Friday by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz.

    Gilmore said he supported a settlement products ban on moral, not legal grounds.

    He explained that while settlements were illegal under international law, the people that lived in them and the products they produced were not.

    “I believe there is a moral case for banning settlement products, and I agree it could have a symbolic,” Gilmore wrote.

    It would be consistent with EU values and positions to exclude settlement products from the EU, he wrote.

    Gilmore cautioned, however, that he didn’t fool himself into thinking that such a ban would make an economic impact.

    “I am somewhat concerned that attention is being focused excessively on the issue of settlement products, which form only one aspect, and a comparatively small one, of the problem. The key issue is settlements themselves and their relentless expansion,” he said.