movie:the prime minister

  • Govt may change immigration settings to take climate change refugees

    The Government is considering tweaking immigration settings to take climate change refugees.

    It has been a week of relentless diplomacy in New York, with not a lot of sleep. The Prime Minister’s spent her days schmoozing and being schmoozed by world leaders, while her nights were spent between juggling bath time for baby Neve and writing speeches.

    https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2018/09/govt-may-change-immigration-settings-to-take-climate-change-refugees.html
    #réfugiés #asile #migrations #climat #changement_climatique #réfugiés_climatiques #réfugiés_environnementaux #Nouvelle_Zélande

  • Govt may change immigration settings to take climate change refugees

    The Government is considering tweaking immigration settings to take climate change refugees.

    It has been a week of relentless diplomacy in New York, with not a lot of sleep. The Prime Minister’s spent her days schmoozing and being schmoozed by world leaders, while her nights were spent between juggling bath time for baby Neve and writing speeches.

    https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2018/09/govt-may-change-immigration-settings-to-take-climate-change-refugees.html
    #réfugiés #asile #migrations #climat #changement_climatique #réfugiés_climatiques #réfugiés_environnementaux #Nouvelle_Zélande

  • Yesterday’s election, Israel’s Future: J Street
    http://jstreet.org/blog/post/yesterdays-election-israels-future_1

    Yesterday’s election, Israel’s Future
    MARCH 18TH, 2015
    Benjamin Netanyahu’s victory is a deep disappointment to all who hoped that Israel might choose a new direction for the country in yesterday’s election.

    The Prime Minister’s renunciation of the two-state solution and resort to a campaign grounded in fear and tinged with racism successfully moved 150,000 votes from other right-wing parties into the Likud column in the campaign’s final days. But we fear that the cost to Israel in the long-run will be steep in terms of support here in the United States and internationally.

    The Prime Minister’s outrageous statements in the campaign’s final days may have pushed him from 19 percent in the polls before the election to 23 percent on election night and cemented his position as the leader of Israel’s right wing, but this was not a broad mandate in support of the direction in which the Prime Minister is leading. Seventy-two percent of Israelis on the eve of the election felt the country is headed in the wrong direction, and only one-third of Israel’s voters supported the hard-right represented by Likud, Naftali Bennett and Avigdor Lieberman, a number roughly comparable to last election. Even in the next Knesset, the blocs of the center-left and of the right wing will continue to be evenly balanced.

    Without question, we respect Israel’s democracy and the outcome of the election. We celebrate the vibrancy of debate and dissent in Israel over essential matters that was on full display during the campaign. And – contrary to the Prime Minister’s panicked attack on the participation of Arab citizens in the election – we view their increased participation in this year’s election as a positive sign about the strength of Israeli democracy.

    None of that can change our core belief, however, that the policies that the Prime Minister articulated in order to win – outright rejection of the two-state solution and territorial compromise – should and will be rejected by the international community, including the United States. Sadly, the results of this election will only deepen Israel’s growing isolation.

    The manner in which the Prime Minister secured his victory – shredding the broad bipartisanship that underpins American political support for Israel and preying on fear and racism at home – also demonstrated that he willingly put his own political interests before his concern for Israel’s relationship with the United States and his commitment to Israel’s democratic character.

    Moving forward, J Street will be unwavering in making the case that Israel’s security and survival as the democratic homeland of the Jewish people require a change in course, recognizing that the need for change is ultimately a matter for the citizens of Israel to debate in the years ahead.

    Here, in the United States, J Street, however, has a clear role to play. We will stand up strongly and proudly in American political and Jewish communal debates for an end to occupation, for a two-state solution and for an Israel that is committed to its core democratic principles and Jewish values.

    We will speak out on behalf of the majority of American supporters of Israel – Jewish and not – who support a two-state solution and oppose moves to limit the rights of any Israeli citizens or to deny the collective right of the Palestinian people to self-determination in a state of their own.

    Faced with a return to power of a Prime Minister who has publicly demonstrated that he does not share those beliefs, we will advocate strongly that the American Jewish community must maintain and even more actively promote its commitment to the core principles and policies which have been bedrocks of the US-Israel relationship for decades.

  • Jerusalem is divided, and Netanyahu remains out of touch
    The prime minister and his policies aren’t the only reasons for the intifada that has been raging in Jerusalem in recent months, but they made a decisive contribution to it.
    By Barak Ravid | Oct. 24, 2014 |Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/.premium-1.622506

    A petty spat between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Energy and Water Resources Minister Silvan Shalom at Wednesday’s cabinet meeting was one of those rare moments in which politicians say what they really think. After Netanyahu said that welders earn a lot of money these days, a furious Shalom told him he was disconnected from the Israeli reality.

    “You didn’t grow up here and didn’t study here,” Shalom said. “You don’t know how things work.”

    Netanyahu’s fighting words about “united Jerusalem” on Thursday reflect that same disconnect from reality Shalom cited. For the last five years, and perhaps even longer, he hasn’t really lived in this city. He knows Jerusalem only from driving in armed convoys between his official residence in the Rehavia neighborhood and government offices, or from his annual walk to the Great Synagogue on Yom Kippur.

    So what Jerusalem is Netanyahu talking about? The eternal capital of Israel that will never be divided exists mainly in his pompous speeches and the press statements issued by his bureau. The reality that has arisen on the ground in Jerusalem over the last decade is completely different: a physically divided city, some of whose neighborhoods are cut in two by the high separation wall, and whose Palestinian residents suffer from neglect and discrimination.

    Netanyahu and his policies aren’t the only reason for the intifada that has been raging in Jerusalem in recent months, but they made a decisive contribution to it. Sometimes, Netanyahu deliberately took steps that heightened the tension, like massive construction for Jews in the eastern part of the city. Other times, he was dragged in the wake of nongovernmental organizations like Elad and Ateret Cohanim, which established Jewish settlements in the heart of crowded Palestinian neighborhoods.

  • Missing OSCE observers are in Severodonetsk - DPR prime minister
    http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/missing-osce-observers-are-in-severodonetsk-dpr-prime-minister-352025.html

    The prime minister of the self-declared Donetsk People’s Republic, Oleksandr Borodai, has confirmed reports that the missing observers of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe are in Severodonetsk.

  • En janvier 2012, le gouvernement du Royaume-Uni a autorisé la livraison de composants susceptibles d’être utilisés pour la fabrication du gaz sarin.

    Revealed : UK Government let British company export nerve gas chemicals to Syria - UK Politics - UK - The Independent
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/revealed-uk-government-let-british-company-export-nerve-gas-chemicals

    The Business Secretary, Vince Cable, will today be asked by MPs to explain why a British company was granted export licences for the dual-use substances for six months in 2012 while Syria’s civil war was raging and concern was rife that the regime could use chemical weapons on its own people. The disclosure of the licences for potassium fluoride and sodium fluoride, which can both be used as precursor chemicals in the manufacture of nerve gas, came as the US Secretary of State John Kerry said the United States had evidence that sarin gas was used in last month’s atrocity in Damascus.

    Mais c’était pour des usages civils et d’ailleurs le temps a manqué pour les livrer.

    The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said: “You see the system working, with materials not exported. The facts are that the licences were revoked and the exports did not take place. The Prime Minister’s view is that that demonstrates that the system is working. There is a sanctions regime, which is a very active part.”

    Critics of the Business Secretary, whose department said it had accepted assurances from the exporting company that the chemicals would be used in the manufacture of metal window frames and shower enclosures, said it appeared the substances had only stayed out of Syria by chance.

    • via LeMonde.fr

      Londres aurait autorisé la vente de gaz chimique à la Syrie en 2012
      http://www.lemonde.fr/proche-orient/article/2013/09/03/londres-aurait-autorise-la-vente-de-gaz-chimique-a-la-syrie-en-2012_3470130_

      Le quotidien britannique The Independent a révélé que le gouvernement britannique a autorisé une entreprise, le 17 janvier 2012, à livrer à la Syrie du fluorure de sodium et de potassium. Il s’agit de substances chimiques pouvant servir à créer des agents neurotoxiques similaires au sarin, du gaz que le régime de Damas aurait utilisé contre la population syrienne.

      Le ministre du commerce, Vince Cable, a reconnu dans une lettre écrite l’année dernière, mais publiée seulement maintenant, que cette autorisation était restée valable pendant six mois. Mais les livraisons n’avaient en fin de compte pas été finalisées. Le ministère précise toutefois que « ces agents chimiques étaient destinés à une utilisation civile ».

  • On the ’Turkish Model’: Neoliberal Democracy with Teargas
    http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/12008/on-the-turkish-model_neoliberal-democracy-with-tea

    Important as this attempt to end the war with the PKK is for the resolution of the Kurdish problem and for the further democratization of the country, other governmental policies point to a severe regression in Turkey’s democratic standards. Examples abound. Academic faculty have lost their jobs because they mention the oppression of Armenians, Kurds or Alawis in their classes. The Prime Minister has ordered the destruction of public artwork that offends his sensibility. His government has also banned a book that documents the relationship between the Turkish police force and an opaque Islamist group strongly entrenched in state security forces before its publication. Finally, last summer, in an attempt to derail public protests in response to the Turkish Air Force’s mass slaughter of thirty-four village smugglers in the Uludere/Roboski region of Turkey in December 2010, Erdogan made a public statement equating this massacre with women getting abortions, saying “every abortion is an Uludere”. He then pushed for legislation that would severely limit women’s access to abortion, as well as caesarian sections.

    Citizens have protested against this onslaught of anti-democratic moves. Most protests, however peaceful, are met with the police’s generous use of tear gas and high-pressure water hoses, in addition to other forms of violence. This process of protest and violence has been ongoing since the demonstrations on Taksim Square on 28 May and until today 3 June, across Istanbul and the rest of Turkey.

    Just a month ago, on 1 May, when citizens attempted to march to Taksim Square for Worker’s Day, they were met with police firing tear gas canisters in abundance. But we did not need this spectacle to know that the government’s commitment to its people safety and wellbeing was less than stellar. According to one report an average four workers lose their life daily in work-related accidents in Turkey. The same day, a number of people, including teenagers, were severely injured and hospitalized, with two suffering hemorrhages from the blows they received in the back of their head, and one losing an eye.

    This is the kind of cruel absurdity that governs the lives of the people of Turkey these days, just as the international news celebrates Turkey’s robust economy and its much acclaimed role as a “democratic model” in the “new Middle East.” For instance, one recent New York Times op-ed covered Erdogan’s recent visit to Washington, DC and his meeting with Obama on intervention in Syria. The terms of Erdogan’s positive evaluation were government’s ability to “progress toward resolving the Kurdish conflict” and its retention of “its impressive economic achievements.” The authors went on to warn that political instability in the region might affect foreign investment in Turkey, and adversely the country’s economic stability.

    What is missing from such sweeping representations of “international relations and foreign policy” are the voices of citizens who dare protest the country’s neoliberal restructuring and the images of the violent police attacks on them. Also missing are the stories of fired teachers who dare speak of oppression and inequality, and the imprisonment of journalists who openly critique the AKP government. Finally, missing from such representations are those of us who aspire to a democratic society. We are ordinary citizens who see no end to the oppressive and abusive politics of the AKP government as Turkey’s democratic Western partners fiddle (or choose to look the other way in the name of “strategic expediency”).

  • Pays baltes : quelques projets de coopération dans le domaine de l’énergie et du transport

    The Cabinet of Ministers fo the Republic of Latvia : Conclusions of the Baltic Prime Ministers’ informal meeting

    http://www.mk.gov.lv/en/aktuali/zinas/2013/may/300513-mp-01

    Conclusions of the Baltic Prime Ministers’ informal meeting
    State Chancellery

    30.05.2013

    The Prime Minister of Estonia Mr. Andrus Ansip, the Prime Minister of Latvia Mr. Valdis Dombrovskis and the Prime Minister of Lithuania Mr. Algirdas Butkevičius have met on May 30 in Jūrmala, Latvia. The Prime Ministers discussed the key issues of regional energy and transport projects, Baltic Council of Ministers’ reform and questions concerning joint external economic cooperation of the three Baltic countries, as well as celebration of the 25th anniversary of the Baltic Way.

    #pays_baltes #lettonie #estonie #lituanie

  • 127 000 $ : c’est le prix que paient les Israéliens pour une « chambre » d’avion de leur président. Ca tombe juste au moment où Yaïr Lapid impose de sévères coupes budgétaires !
    Netanyahu spends $127,000 of Israeli taxpayers’ money on airplane ’resting chamber’ - National Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/netanyahu-spends-127-000-of-israeli-taxpayers-money-on-airplane-resting-cha

    After report in Channel 10, the Prime Minister’s Office responded saying that the prime minister needed to rest after a hectic day and before representing Israel at international forums.
    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spent $127,000 of Israeli taxpayers’ money on a “resting chamber” that was especially constructed for him and his wife on their five-hour flight to London last month, Channel 10 reported on Friday.

    Once Netanyahu was informed of former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher’s death, he announced that he would travel to the funeral with his wife Sara. According to the report, his office issued a tender to Israeli airlines to charter a jet for 75 passengers to take the Netanyahus to London and return them to Israel the next day.

    The Prime Minister’s Office asked that the plane be fitted with 22 business class seats and a resting chamber – a double bed surrounded by four walls and a door. This request was especially costly because only El Al’s larger planes are fitted to allow for such arrangements. El Al won the tender with a bid of $427 thousand.

    If the Prime Minister’s Office were to forgo the resting chamber, Israel’s smaller airlines such as Arkia and Israir could have participated in the tender. A simple calculation showed that the resting chamber raised the price of the flight by $127,000.

    “The protocol for flying the prime minister to meetings abroad hadn’t changed and is the same as was during previous administrations. In accordance to security directives, the Israeli premier only travels with Israeli airlines,” the Prime Minister’s Office said in a statement. “In accordance to the prime minister’s orders, the cost of the trip, which lasted less than 48 hours, was minimized.”

    Netanyahu’s office went on to explain the necessity of the room, citing his hectic schedule.

    “The prime minister left for London at the end of Independence Day after he attended a reception for exceptional soldiers, the International Bible Contest, a reception for foreign diplomats, and the Israel Prize ceremony. The flight was scheduled for midnight, after a long day at these events. The next day, the prime minister was to represent the State of Israel in a number of official international events, including a meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and a meeting with British Prime Minister David Cameron. With this in mind, it is warranted that the prime minister be given an opportunity to sleep during the night between these two busy days,” the Prime Minister’s Office explained.

  • So, Boris, rioters make you angry. What about your Bullingdon pal? - UK Politics, UK - The Independent
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/so-boris-rioters-make-you-angry-what-about-your-bullingdon-pal-234138

    The Prime Minister, David Cameron, the Chancellor, George Osborne, and the Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, were some of the best-known members of the club – an elite dining society notorious for its drunken excesses. It has a tradition of “omerta”, a code of silence, among its members.

    But last week an eyewitness came forward with a tale of how he recalled witnessing a man “with a shock of white blond hair” lob the pot plant. Happily, we are assured it was not the Mayor of London but one who may also have had blond locks.

    Paul Wiffen, a fellow Oxford alumnus, felt compelled to speak out after hearing Mr Johnson speak of his “blinding anger at the callousness and selfishness of the rioters”.

    But last night, Mr Johnson’s spokesman, Guto Harri, admitted that the Mayor remembers the name of the Bullingdon hooligan responsible for an act of vandalism similar to those he condemned. Why then, we asked, did Boris not reveal who it was at the time, considering police had interviewed members of the drinking club in an attempt to discover the culprit?

    #ukriots

  • The Prime Minister’s draconian gimmicks - The Independent
    http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/leading-articles/leading-article-the-prime-ministers-draconian-gimmicks-2336055.html

    The most egregious suggestion from Mr Cameron is that the Government will look in to disrupting social media where there are suspicions that these forums are being used to encourage or facilitate criminal behaviour. That is the sort of thing that has been attempted by Middle Eastern autocracies in the face of revolts from their own oppressed populations. It is embarrassing that our own Prime Minister should be contemplating dragging Britain down that particular dead-end street.