The revolution will be televised !
Où l’on apprend que les frères Djorkaev avaient procédé à des exécutions ciblées avant de passer à l’acte :
The revolution will be televised !
Où l’on apprend que les frères Djorkaev avaient procédé à des exécutions ciblées avant de passer à l’acte :
Reste une question : pourquoi les policiers américains auraient-ils abattu sans chercher à le maîtriser un homme ne disposant apparemment pas d’arme à feu et qui pouvait potentiellement constituer une source d’information de toute première importance sur les suspects de l’attentat de Boston ?
Pour le FBI, Antiwar.com vaut bien AP
http://www.dedefensa.org/article-pour_le_fbi_antiwarcom_vaut_bien_ap_22_05_2013.html
Citation et commentaire du 22 mai 2013 – contribution de dedefensa.org
CANADA : Le gouvernement et la police pris en flagrant délit de téléchargements illégaux de fichiers ! | TorrentNews.net |
http://torrentnews.net/2013/05/19/canada-le-gouvernement-et-la-police-pris-en-flagrant-delit-de-telecharg
#ROOOH
“Watergatiser” Scandalgate grâce à Benghazi ?
http://www.dedefensa.org/article-_watergatiser_scandalgate_gr_ce_benghazi__20_05_2013.html
• Des scandales washingtoniens, Benghazi est le plus fécond. • Poussée pour créer une commission type-Watergate.
Chronique du 19 courant… Journaliste, lui ?
http://www.dedefensa.org/article-chronique_du_19_courant_journaliste_lui__19_05_2013.html
• Se saisissant de l’actualité (le scandale AP/FBI à Washington), l’auteur de cette chronique se penche sur la profession qu’il exerce au travers de ce site. • Journaliste ? Ce n’est pas assuré, et l’on pourrait parler aussi bien d’observateur et de chroniqueur, avec des références qui tiennent à bonne distance le diktat du flux des événements. • Il faut savoir comment une telle position a été rendue possible et, pour cela, reconnaître le phénomène de l’internet. •Une évolution si grande qu’on parlerait de (...)
Affaire PSN. Aux États-Unis, il ne faut pas nettoyer son PC
http://neosting.net/actualite/psn-todd-miller-assignation-residence.html
Cette histoire, elle serait vraiment drôle si elle n’était pas aussi triste et si elle ne reflétait pas un certain totalitarisme ambiant au États-Unis, pays soi-disant démocratique. Vous vous souvenez peut-être de l’affaire du PlayStation Network qui s’était fait hacker ... #hack #jugement #kcuf #psn #todd-miller
Les métadonnées comptent : comment l’enregistrement des conversations téléphoniques et les lois obsolètes nuisent à la liberté de la presse et à la vie privée - Verge
http://www.theverge.com/2013/5/16/4336994/metadata-matters-how-phone-records-and-obsolete-laws-harm-privacy
Le gouvernement américain via son service fiscal a espionné les lignes téléphoniques des journalistes d’Associated Press. Sans avoir accès au contenu, l’administration fiscale a eu accès aux numéros, aux durées des appelles, au localisations (pas au contenu) : voir cet article du Monde pour les explications : http://www.lemonde.fr/ameriques/article/2013/05/14/benghazi-irs-ap-les-affaires-qui-fragilisent-barack-obama_3200459_3222.html. Mais rappelle The Verge, il y a des catégories entières (...)
Va-t-on (enfin) intervenir (en Libye) ?
http://www.dedefensa.org/article-va-t-on_enfin_intervenir_en_libye__17_05_2013.html
• Après le siège de la ville de Tripoli, on spécule. • Réflexions autour d’une rumeur d’intervention (US) ...
Littéralement pour les considérations électorales les plus viles, le gouvernement US a refusé toute aide sérieuse qui aurait sans doute permis de sauver l’ambassadeur ; il était impératif de ne pas risquer d’impliquer les USA dans une “intervention” en Libye alors que le sort du monde se jouait puisque le Saint-président avait entamé la campagne pour sa réélection et qu’une géguerre postmoderniste de plus aurait fait mauvais effet.
Tempête sur le Premier Amendement
http://www.dedefensa.org/article-temp_te_sur_le_premier_amendement_16_05_2013.html
• Une tempête secoue Washington, un scandale secoue l’administration Obama. • Une tempête de plus, un scandale de plus, dans ce que le Guardian désigne déjà comme “une des pires semaines qu’ait connues l’administration Obama”. •Il s’agit du scandale des listes d’appel téléphoniques des journalistes d’Associated Press obtenues par le FBI, qui mène une enquête avec ses énormes sabots. • Levée de boucliers unanime : le sacro-saint Premier Amendement de la Constitution est menacé ! • Il n’y a pas que de la narrative (...)
In AP surveillance case, the real scandal is what’s legal
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/05/14/in-ap-surveillance-case-the-real-scandal-is-whats-legal
U.S. law allows the government to engage in this type of surveillance—on media organizations or anyone else—without meaningful judicial oversight.
The key here is a legal principle known as the “third party doctrine,” which says that users don’t have Fourth Amendment rights protecting information they voluntarily turn over to someone else. Courts have said that when you dial a phone number, you are voluntarily providing information to your phone company, which is then free to share it with the government.
Un amendement de la constitution US fait donc l’objet d’une sur-interprétation loufoque quand il s’agit de légaliser la corruption des représentants de la nation par des affairistes véreux (exemple du premier amendement dans l’affaire Citizens United versus Federal Election Commission), et d’une sous-interprétation non moins loufoque quand il s’agit de légaliser l’aliénation des citoyens.
Et il apparaît que les seules fuites garanties par le quatrième amendement sont celles dont le divulgateur est le gouvernement lui-même.
Associated Press dit avoir été surveillé aux USA- http://fr.news.yahoo.com/associated-press-dit-avoir-%C3%A9t%C3%A9-surveill%C3%A9-aux-usa-20294
Spying on The Associated Press - NYTimes.com
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/15/opinion/spying-on-the-associated-press.html?smid=tw-share
The Obama administration, which has a chilling zeal for investigating leaks and prosecuting leakers, (...) in what looks like a fishing expedition for sources and an effort to frighten off whistle-blowers.
(...)
We are not convinced. For more than 30 years, the news media and the government have used a well-honed system to balance the government’s need to pursue criminals or national security breaches with the media’s constitutional right to inform the public. This action against The A.P., as the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press outlined in a letter to Mr. Holder, “calls into question the very integrity” of the administration’s policy toward the press.
(...)
The Obama administration has indicted six current and former officials under the Espionage Act, which had previously been used only three times since it was enacted in 1917. One, a former C.I.A. officer, pleaded guilty under another law for revealing the name of an agent who participated in the torture of a terrorist suspect. Meanwhile, President Obama decided not to investigate, much less prosecute, anyone who actually did the torturing .
...
FBI surrounds house of Saudi student following sightings of him with pressure cooker pot, only to find he was cooking rice | Mail Online
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2323316/FBI-surrounds-house-Saudi-student-following-sightings-pressure-cooker-p
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/05/12/article-0-19BCFCF8000005DC-843_634x343.jpg
via oAnth at D* : https://joindiaspora.com/posts/2611396
Revealed: how the FBI coordinated the crackdown on Occupy | Naomi Wolf | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk
– ►http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/29/fbi-coordinated-crackdown-occupy
– Revealed: how the FBI coordinated the crackdown on Occupy
New documents prove what was once dismissed as paranoid fantasy: totally integrated corporate-state repression of dissent
[...]
[S]ix American universities are sites where campus police funneled information about students involved with OWS to the FBI, with the administrations’ knowledge (p51); banks sat down with FBI officials to pool information about OWS protesters harvested by private security; plans to crush Occupy events, planned for a month down the road, were made by the FBI – and offered to the representatives of the same organizations that the protests would target; and even threats of the assassination of OWS leaders by sniper fire – by whom? Where? – now remain redacted and undisclosed to those American citizens in danger, contrary to standard FBI practice to inform the person concerned when there is a threat against a political leader (p61).
As Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, executive director of the PCJF, put it, the documents show that from the start, the FBI – though it acknowledges Occupy movement as being, in fact, a peaceful organization – nonetheless designated OWS repeatedly as a “terrorist threat”:
[...]
#ows #occupy #surveillance #FBI #classification #USA
Are we all Muslim now? Assata Shakur and the Terrordome
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/05/20135712155495678.html
Organised confusion
By all credible accounts, Assata is not guilty of killing Officer Forester in 1973. But the focus by many on her innocence as the reason why she is not a “terrorist” misses the point completely. Because whether she’s innocent or not, the labelling of her as a “terrorist” has more to do with her political beliefs and the liberation struggles that she was a part of. In fact, it’s those very beliefs and activities that led to her (and others) being targeted under the FBI’s COINTELPRO, persecuted, put on trial, convicted and then forced to ultimately flee the country and live in exile in Cuba. For the US state, when it comes to labelling a “terrorist”, innocence or guilt are simply irrelevant details.
For her supporters and those on the Left who deny that she’s a “terrorist”, we have to understand that to the US government that’s exactly what she is. But instead of denying it, it’s high time that we instead challenge the prevailing logic of “terrorism”, refuse to normalise it, and recognise it for what it is: not only a political label used to discredit and undermine struggles for self-determination, but also a legal frame that then gives the state the sanction and power to narrow the scope of dissent and violently crackdown and arrest, incarcerate, torture, bomb, drone, invade, and even assassinate those deemed threats to state interests.
DOJ: We don’t need warrants for e-mail, Facebook chats
An FBI investigation manual updated last year, obtained by the ACLU, says it’s possible to warrantlessly obtain Americans’ e-mail “without running afoul” of the Fourth Amendment.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57583395-38/doj-we-dont-need-warrants-for-e-mail-facebook-chats
Obama May Back F.B.I. Plan to Wiretap Web Users - NYTimes.com
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/08/us/politics/obama-may-back-fbi-plan-to-wiretap-web-users.html?pagewanted=all
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration, resolving years of internal debate, is on the verge of backing a Federal Bureau of Investigation plan for a sweeping overhaul of surveillance laws that would make it easier to wiretap people who communicate using the Internet rather than by traditional phone services, according to officials familiar with the deliberations.
L’attentat de Boston relance le débat sur le flicage des conversations - Rue89
http://www.rue89.com/2013/05/06/lattentat-boston-relance-debat-flicage-conversations-242090
Comment le FBI et la CIA ont-elles accès à toutes nos conversations numériques ? La NSA - National Security Agency - américaine collabore avec de nombreux opérateurs pour récupérer automatiquement des données. En 2010, une enquête établissait qu’1,7 milliard d’e-mails, appels téléphoniques et autres communications étaient interceptées par la NSA chaque jour. Pour traiter cet effroyable ensemble de donnée, la NSA s’est doté d’un centre de données dans l’Utah... Le FBI plaide pour qu’une loi lui soit votée (...)
☠ Bluetouff’s blog - Affaire Tsarnaev : la surveillance de masse des citoyens américains révélée par un ex-agent du FBI
►http://bluetouff.com/2013/05/05/affaire-tsarnaev-la-surveillance-de-masse-des-citoyens-americains-revelee
Tamerlan Tsarnaev faisait il l’objet d’une attention spécifique qui aurait conduit les autorités à le placer sur écoute ? Non ! L’explication de Tim Clemente est simple : TOUTES les conversations des citoyens américains sont enregistrées, archivées, et indexées dans une gigantesque base de données à laquelle les autorités peuvent accéder dans le cadre d’enquêtes sur des questions de #sécurité nationale.
[...]
Et les chiffres font mal au crâne :
Every day, collection systems at the National Security Agency intercept and store 1.7 billion e-mails, phone calls and other types of communications.
1,7 milliard de communications sont enregistrées quotidiennement.
Les US en seraient donc arrivés à surveiller leur population d’une manière aussi systématique, mais plus efficace, que l’ancienne STASI
’No, welcome to America. All of that stuff is being captured as we speak whether we know it or like it or not.’ ’All of that stuff’ — meaning every telephone conversation Americans have with one another on U.S. soil, with or without a search warrant — ’is being captured as we speak.’ ’No digital communication is secure,’ by which he means not that any communication is susceptible to government interception as it happens (although that is true), but far beyond that: all digital communications — meaning telephone calls, emails, online chats and the like — are automatically recorded and stored and accessible to the government after the fact. To describe that is to define what a ubiquitous, limitless Surveillance State is."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/04/telephone-calls-recorded-fbi-boston/print
Affaire Tsarnaev : la surveillance de masse des citoyens américains révélée par un ex-agent du FBI
►http://bluetouff.com/2013/05/05/affaire-tsarnaev-la-surveillance-de-masse-des-citoyens-americains-revelee
Voici une information qui risque d’avoir l’effet d’une petite bombe, aux USA, et probablement ailleurs. Sur Reflets comme sur ce blog, nous avons souvent pointé du doigt de « grandes démocraties » qui font un usage immodéré des technologies de surveillance de masse. D’une certaine manière, l’usage de ces technologies est un excellent baromètre des dérives de certains pays. Et en matière de…
Assata Shakur in Her Own Words: Rare Recording of Activist Named to FBI Most Wanted Terrorists List
The FBI has added the former Black Panther Assata Shakur to its Most Wanted Terrorists list 40 years after the killing for which she was convicted. Born Joanne Chesimard, Shakur was found guilty of shooting dead a New Jersey state trooper during a gunfight in 1973.
http://www.democracynow.org/2013/5/3/assata_shakur_in_her_own_words
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/05/03/tupac-assata-shakur-fbi-most-wanted-terrorist-list-_n_3206206.html
The step-aunt and godmother of rapper Tupac Shakur has become the first woman to be added to the FBI Most Wanted Terrorist List.
#cointel_pro #usa #fbi
Tamerlan, de la Géorgie à Boston
http://www.dedefensa.org/article-tamerlan_de_la_g_orgie_boston_02_05_2013.html
• Une “piste” intéressante pour l’attaque de Boston. • Un effet direct de l’“agression douce” du bloc BAO contre la Russie.
Who Has Your Back ? 2013
https://www.eff.org/who-has-your-back-2013
When you use the Internet, you entrust your conversations, thoughts, experiences, locations, photos, and more to companies like Google, AT&T and Facebook. But what do these companies do when the government demands your private information? Do they stand with you? Do they let you know what’s going on?
j’en profite pour recenser cette nouvelle initiative de l’EFF, the SSD Project
Surveillance Self-Defense
https://ssd.eff.org
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has created this Surveillance Self-Defense site to educate the American public about the law and technology of government surveillance in the United States, providing the information and tools necessary to evaluate the threat of surveillance and take appropriate steps to defend against it.
Alors que #CISPA a été suspendu au Sénat, et qu’on discute de #CALEA_2 une mise à jour du Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act qui date de 1994
Some technology companies have developed a wiretap capability for some of their services. But a range of communications companies and services are not required to do so under what is known as CALEA, the 1994 Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act. Among those services are social media networks and the chat features on online gaming sites.
Former officials say the challenge for investigators was exacerbated in 2010, when Google began end-to-end encryption of its e-mail and text messages after its networks were hacked. Facebook followed suit. That made it more difficult for the FBI to intercept e-mail by serving a court order on the Internet service provider, whose pipes would carry the encrypted traffic.
The proposal would make clear that CALEA extends to Internet phone calls conducted between two computer users without going through a central company server — what is sometimes called “peer-to-peer” communication. But the heart of the proposal would add a provision to the 1968 Wiretap Act that would allow a court to levy fines.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/proposal-seeks-to-fine-tech-companies-for-noncompliance-with-wiretap-orders/2013/04/28/29e7d9d8-a83c-11e2-b029-8fb7e977ef71_story.html
Boston bombers’ uncle married daughter of top CIA official | MadCow Morning News
http://www.madcowprod.com/2013/04/26/boston-bombers-uncle-married-daughter-of-top-cia-official
The uncle of the two suspected Boston bombers in last week’s attack, Ruslan Tsarni, was married to the daughter of former top CIA official Graham Fuller
The discovery that Uncle Ruslan Tsarni had spy connections that go far deeper than had been previously known is ironic, especially since the mainstrean media’s focus yesterday was on a feverish search to find who might have recruited the Tsarnaev brothers.
Attentat de Boston : Sunil Tripathi, faux suspect, retrouvé mort