organization:french parliament

  • Macron’s California Revolution | by Sylvain #Cypel | NYR Daily | The New York Review of Books
    http://www.nybooks.com/daily/2017/07/05/macrons-california-revolution

    Among the many ideas put forward by Emmanuel Macron, the new French president, was to institute an annual speech to the French parliament, a sort of State of the Union à la française. It seems that he couldn’t wait more than ten days after the legislative elections to give it a try. On Monday, in a major speech in the French Parliament, Macron compared his election to a “new start” for a country that is “regaining optimism and hope”; he also introduced a raft of bold proposals for streamlining government. But even bolder than his proposals was the speech itself, and the American-style executive it seemed to usher in.

    Along with the speech, there has been Macron’s quasi-official investiture of his wife, Brigitte, as a highly visible First Lady. And then there are the market-driven economic policies he has endorsed. All this has seemed—from the French point of view—emblematic of Macron’s #fascination with the United States. Or to be more exact, with the California version of the United States, where #Silicon_Valley libertarianism mixes with a general progressivism on social issues—access to education and health care, openness to immigration and minorities, support for gay marriage, efforts to control climate change, etc. Didn’t he declare, on June 15, visiting VivaTech, a technological fair, that he intends to transform #France in “a nation of #start-ups” able to “attract foreign talents”?

    #Etats-Unis

  • Ready for the future? A survey on open access with scientists from the French National Research Center (CNRS)
    https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01399422/document

    The French survey uncovers attitudes, needs and behaviours similar to other countries, except for OA publishing with APCs where French scientists appear more reluctant and hesitantthan their colleagues from other European countries. One explanation may be the fact that France globally spendsless for scientific information than other similar countries; also APCs may appear less affordable. However, these differences should not be over-interpreted. Since 2014, the situation has changed in France as well as in other European countries, and openaccess to scientific information is fast becoming the dominant model of academic communication.
    Today, the debate is no longer on pros and cons of open access. In 2016 the French parliament will probably adopta new law (“Loi pour une République Numérique”) granting secondary exploitation rights to scientists, similar to German, Austrian andDutch legislation. Together with the other EU Member States, France is committed to Open Science and will continue to increase the availability of French research results. The challenge today is how to get there. For more than 15 years, France has developed an open access infrastructure with national operating agents, a large open repository (HAL) and public OA journal and book platforms especially in social sciences and humanities. This public infrastructure is now in competition with OA publishing and APCs mainly controlled by large corporate publishers.
    One challenge is the control over dissemination, access and preservation of research results, and over innovation in the field of academic publishing. Another challenge is the exploitation of the growing volume of research results through content mining, and the control of these technologies and tools. Will the research community maintain (or regain) control overits data, overusage, impact, evaluation etc.? Who will add value to content, who will provide metrics forresearch output, fornetworks, experts, emerging topics etc.? Will the dysfunctional scientific information market survive, with its oligopolies, mergers and benefits? Should it?

    #open_access
    #xyzaeiou

  • Baton Rape Case Fuels Anger over Racist Policing in France
    https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/voices/baton-rape-case-fuels-anger-over-racist-policing-france

    n the late afternoon of February 2 this year, French police in the Paris suburb of Aulnay-sous-Bois began carrying out identity checks on a group of young men outside one of the town’s large public housing developments.

    There was nothing unusual about the operation. But it resulted in a 22-year-old man with no criminal record being forced to the ground, beaten, and anally raped with a police baton.

    The black victim, identified only as Theo L., suffered serious injuries to the rectum, requiring major emergency surgery. A police officer was subsequently charged with rape, and an investigation into the events surrounding the assault is continuing. Since the events, there have been regular protests across the country, some leading to clashes between protestors and police

    The events recall other protests that have for decades regularly shaken France’s poor suburbs, after local residents, usually young men, suffered injuries or death in incidents involving the police—notably in 1981 in Venissieux, in 1994 in Rouen, in 2005 in Clichy-sous-Bois, in 2007 in Val d’Oise, in 2009 in Montreuil, to name some of the most infamous.

    These incidents have fueled the public debate about the way that the French police interact with minority communities. Reformers, including the Open Society Foundations and their partners, have argued for an end in particular to the frequent, persistent, and aggressive stop and search practices that disproportionally focus on minority groups, and which have repeatedly sparked community outrage.

    But the Theo scandal has also brought into the open an aspect of this use that some have hitherto been unwilling to address—the extent to which sexual abuse and even assault is often part of the abuse to which young people of color are subjected during police stops.

    The last time this issue was headline news was in December 2015, when 18 junior high and high school students brought a group legal complaint against the local police in the 12th Arrondissement of Paris. The complaint, filed by lawyers Slim Ben Achour and Félix de Belloy, and supported by a number of local French associations, alleged that over a two-year period police officers had repeatedly carried out body searches that amounted to sexual assault together with other forms of physical abuse and harassment, and that they had singled out for retaliation anyone who tried to complain.

    Previously, questions of sexual abuse by police had focused on individual cases, usually dismissed by the police as the work of one or two bad officers. The lawsuit, and the media attention around it, marked a first shift towards considering sexual harassment and abuse as a systemic problem that the police need to address.

    Now the Theo case has led to a further shift. Survivors of assaults, both present and past, are now speaking publicly and bravely about these humiliating and degrading experiences and demanding reform. This is a major development as this was a taboo subject that victims did not speak about for a variety of reasons: shame, fear of reactions of family and friends, a feeling of powerlessness, and fear of police reprisals.

    At the same time, there has been a gradual evolution over the past five years in public awareness of the inherent problems of police stops that single out visible minorities (known in French as controle à facies). Legal action, supported by the Open Society Justice Initiative, led to a landmark ruling from the highest administrative court in November last year that police stops based on the way someone looks or their supposed ethnic origin are illegal, increasing pressure on the police to change their practices and record keeping.

    Yet the politically powerful police unions remain opposed to any constructive reform efforts—including the principle that all stops should be properly recorded to enable a proper understanding of who is being stopped, and why.

    The depths of the problems with policing culture in France was made abundantly clear the week after the assault on Theo L. when a leader of the largest police union argued on television that a derogatory, racist term used by police to insult Theo during the encounter was “fairly acceptable.” The comment provoked wide public outcry and a rebuke from the Interior Minister.

    The importance of establishing a new relationship between the police and minority communities has been underlined by French political leaders for many years.

    However, statements have failed to translate into badly needed reforms. Instead, while protests and debates over the widespread nature of police abuse dominate the media, the French Parliament incongruously passed another security law extending police powers to use weapons and increasing penal sanctions for the offenses of “insult and rebellion,” charges regularly brought against young people reacting against identity checks and frisks.

    As France gears up for presidential and parliamentary elections this year, the issue of what constitutes truly effective policing will be bitterly contested. The case of Theo has clearly demonstrated the need for a change in the model of French policing, if there is to be any hope for building a more cooperative future for the policing of minority communities. Or, as Le Monde, the leading French establishment daily, noted: “France is the European country where the general public has least trust in the police, and where the police most disregard the public. The presidential campaign needs to include a great debate on how to defuse this formidable machine that only serves to generate discontent.”

    #france #violence #femmes #police

  • Benjamin Netanyahu’s Shady French Connection
    http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.710864

    Avec un compte bancaire à Beyrouth dit l’article du Ha’aretz

    Nouvelles révélations sur Arnaud Mimran, le « golden boy » en eaux troubles
    http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/justice/20160303.OBS5792/nouvelles-revelations-sur-arnaud-mimran-le-golden-boy-en-eaux-t

    Contacté par « l’Obs » en novembre, #Meyer_Habib n’avait pas souhaité s’exprimer sur le sujet en raison des enquêtes en cours. Proche de l’actuel premier ministre israélien, le député UDI aurait-il présenté le golden boy à Benjamin Netanyahou ? Les deux hommes se connaissent. "D’après plusieurs témoignages concordants, la famille a aidé le parti Likoud et prêté au début des années 2000 son appartement de l’avenue Victor-Hugo (Paris XVIe) à Netanyahou, surnommé « Bibi » en Israël", écrit Mediapart. Et le site d’enquête de publier une photo prise à l’été 2003 de Mimran en « compagnie d’un ’Bibi’ décontracté, chemise ouverte, en bord de mer à Monaco ».

    [...]

    Enfin, selon Mediapart, Mimran disposerait aussi de contacts dans la police. Dans l’une de ses auditions, ce dernier se serait même targué de connaître un certain « Seb » qu’il présente comme un policier de la DGSI. « J’ai rencontré Arnaud Mimran en 2013. Il se targuait d’avoir de solides protections policières en France. […] Ce sont des choses qu’il évoquait librement devant moi pour faire état de ses protections », confiait quant à lui lors d’une audition de décembre 2014 cité par Médiapart, Cyril Astruc, présenté par « Vanity Fair » comme « l’escroc du siècle » pour son implication supposée dans l’escroquerie à la taxe carbone.

    • http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.710864

      (...) One of the partners who was arrested, and will stand trial alongside Mimran, is Marco Mouly, a Tunisian Jew with a long history of misdeeds. He opened many bank accounts in Tunisia and Cyprus that were used in the scam. Though he told investigators during questioning that his share in the fraud amounted to only 1.4 million euros, unexplained assets worth much more than that were found in his possession.

      In 2012, Mouly loaned four million euros to one Thierry Leyne, a French-Israeli financier who was a business partner of former French finance minister and International Monetary Fund chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn. On October 23, 2014, Leyne leaped to his death from his 23rd-floor apartment in Tel Aviv’s Yoo Towers.

      Another Israeli who appears in Mediapart’s investigation as one of Mimran’s influential connections is Netanyahu’s unofficial representative in Paris, Meyer Habib. A jeweler by trade, Habib is a member of the French Parliament and chairman of the Friends of Netanya Academic College. He has great influence over Netanyahu’s schedule of meetings, both personal and official, in France.

      According to the investigating magistrate’s report, Habib’s jewelry firm made a special rose-gold ring for Mimran that was embossed, intimidatingly, with a skull. On September 14, 2010, Mimran sought to give the ring as a gift to one of the key witnesses in the investigation against him: Sammy Souied, an Israeli from Herzliya who was a suspect in a 2005 case involving money laundering at Bank Hapoalim’s Hayarkon branch in Tel Aviv.

      Souied had a less romantic goal: He asked Mimran repeatedly for 30 million euros, his share in the scam according to Souied’s own calculations. Souied flew to Paris for one day to convince Mimran to pay him the money without delay.

      After an early-morning flight from Ben-Gurion International Airport, Souied met with Mimran twice, at two different Parisian cafes, but without success. The two agreed to meet a third time that evening, before Souied’s return flight to Israel. The meeting was set for 8 P.M. in Porte Maillot, not far from the Arc de Triomphe.

      Souied arrived on time. Mimran was three minutes late. He began walking toward Souied, holding the ring, when a motor scooter with two passengers pulled up. The man on the back pulled out a pistol with a silencer and fired six bullets at Souied, who died on the spot. Police found the ring with the skull next to his body, mute testimony to the rules of a criminal organization whose path, whether by chance or not, crossed that of too many other people, including the prime minister of Israel.

      The Prime Minister’s Office said in response that, “the innuendos in this report are false and ridiculous. For many years now, there has been no connection between the Netanyahu family and the Mimran family. The meetings in question, in France, occurred when Mr. Netanyahu was a private citizen. At that time, the Mimran family was well-known and respected in France and there were no legal allegations against it. Netanyahu didn’t ask for anything from, didn’t receive any contributions from and didn’t give anything to the Mimran family. It goes without saying that he didn’t intervene in any legal proceeding in which it was involved."

    • Le sang de la bourse carbone
      15 février 2016 | Par Fabrice Arfi
      https://www.mediapart.fr/journal/france/150216/le-sang-de-la-bourse-carbone?page_article=3

      Contre toute attente, après quatre mois de détention provisoire et contre l’avis de l’avocat général, la chambre de l’instruction de la cour d’appel de Paris a décidé, un an jour pour jour après les faits, le 15 janvier 2016, de remettre en liberté Arnaud Mimran (contre une caution de 100 000 euros) et son complice présumé Farid Khider.

      #mafia_franco_israélienne

  • France moves ahead on posted workers without waiting for EU | EurActiv
    http://www.euractiv.com/trade/france-plays-solo-low-cost-worke-news-532718
    http://www.euractiv.com/sites/all/themes/euractiv/images/logoheader.png

    As the EU elections approach, France is pressing ahead to strengthen safeguards against the abuse of low-cost foreign workers within Europe, without waiting for the European institutions to hammer out the final text of the revised EU Posted Workers Directive.

    France will not wait for EU institutions to adopt the final text of the revised posted workers directive before strengthening its own laws. The Socialist majority in the French parliament has presented a legislative text aimed at better framing the practice, which has long been denounced for abuses in sectors such as construction.

    The 1996 posted workers directive allows companies to send their employees to work another EU state for a limited period of time, leading to accusation of social dumping. The directive is currently under revision but for the moment the posting of workers leads sometimes to social dumping.

    Indeed, social contributions are paid in the worker’s country of origin, not the host country, leading to a 30% labour cost difference between France and Poland.

    Accountability of French companies

    To address this, the draft law foresees a number of measures to hold French companies accountable for their subcontractors, going further than the European legislation currently under revision.

    The extended accountability would apply not only to the construction sector, as the revised EU directive currently foresees, but also to to other activities. Concretely, it will be up to French employers to make sure that posted workers among their sub-contractors are registered with the labour inspection administration.

    According to official figures, there were 145,000 posted workers registered in France in 2011. But unofficial figures are much higher and range between 220,000 and 300,000 per year.

    The final employer will also be responsible for paying wages in case contractual obligations are not met. For example, if a union informs a company that its subcontractor does not respect the minimum wage obligation, it will be up to the French company to remedy it, by forcing its subcontractor to pay a decent wage to the posted workers and, eventually, by paying the bill itself.

    Finally, the Socialists’ draft law proposes to put in place a “black list” of companies already condemned for illegal activities....

    #posted-workers
    #France
    #Europe
    #Social
    #Jobs

  • Asia Times Online :: Why France is playing ’stupid’ on Iran
    Nov 12, ’13 / By Pepe Escobar
    http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/MID-02-121113.html

    (...)
    Meet Bandar Fabius
    As far as French behavior is concerned, it is conditioned as much by the formidable Israeli lobby in Paris as hard cash from Gulf petro-monarchies.

    It certainly helped that, according to The Times of Israel, French parliament member Meyer Habib - also a holder of an Israeli passport, a former official Likud spokesperson in France, and a close pal of Bibi’s - called French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius to tell him Israel would attack Iranian nuclear installations if the current deal on the table was clinched. [3]

    Call it the AIPAC effect. Habib is the vice-president of the Conseil Representatif des Institutions juives de France, or CRIF - the French equivalent to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. The ghostwriter of President Hollande’s speeches also happens to be a member of CRIF.

    Fabius, grandiloquent and as slippery as runny Roquefort, invoked - what else - “security concerns of Israel” to derail Geneva. Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and Foreign Minister Mohammed Javed Zarif were always extremely worried about being sabotaged by their own internal opposition, the hard line Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps. So their number one directive was that no details of the deal should be leaked during the negotiations.

    That’s exactly what Fabius did. Even before Kerry landed in Geneva, Fabius was telling a French radio station that Paris would not accept a jeu des dupes ("fools’ game").

    The role of Fabius was pricelessly summed up by the proverbial unnamed Western diplomat telling Reuters, “The Americans, the EU and the Iranians have been working intensively for months on this proposal, and this is nothing more than an attempt by Fabius to insert himself into relevance late in the negotiations.” [4]

    Terabytes of spin have been asserting that Washington and Paris are playing good cop-bad cop on the Iranian dossier. Not exactly; it’s more like the Gallic rooster once again showing off.

    Hollande was gung-ho on bombing Damascus when Obama backed off at the 11th minute from the Pentagon’s “limited” attack; Hollande was left staring at a stale bottle of Moet. On both Syria and Lebanon, Paris is unabashedly playing a mix of neocolonial hugs and kisses while sharing the bed with Israel and the House of Saud.

    But why, once again, shoot itself in the foot? Paris has lost a lot of money - not to mention French jobs, via automaker Peugeot - because of the Iran sanctions dementia.

    Ah, but there is always the seduction of Saudi Arabia’s intelligence chief Prince Bandar bin Sultan, aka Bandar Bush, and the Gulf petro-monarchies. In a nutshell; Bandar Fabius was nothing but playing paperboy for the House of Saud. The prize: huge military contracts - aircraft, warships, missile systems - and possible construction of nuclear power plants in Saudi Arabia, a deal similar to the one energy giant French Areva clinched last year with the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

    The ghost of Montaigne must be squirming; France does not do irony anymore. Iran has no right to have its own nuclear plants, but France builds them and operates them for its Wahhabi clients.

    The West doing Israel’s bidding makes sense; after all Israel may also be interpreted as a Western aircraft carrier in the heart of the Arab Middle East. As for France doing the Wahhabis’ bidding, just follow the money - from Veolia building and operating water desalination plants in Saudi Arabia to all those Rafale fighter jets to be unloaded.

    Qatar, that slavery paradise presented by FIFA with a World Cup, has already invested over US$15 billion - and counting - in France, from shares in Veolia and energy behemoth Total to construction firm Vinci, media giant Lagardere, and full control of Paris Saint Germain, home of the new King of Paris, football icon Zlatan “Ibracadabra” Ibrahimovic. Not to mention that Qatar has bought virtually every significant square inch between Madeleine and Opera in Paris.

    Hollande is a joke. This week he’s on the cover of the Courrier International weekly (headline: “The Art of the Fall”), with pan-European media judging him “incoherent”, “paralyzed” and “incompetent” (and these are the merciful epithets). On the weekend edition of the establishment Le Figaro daily, he was being destroyed because of France’s (latest) credit rating downgrade by Standard & Poor’s.

    King Sarko The First - aka former president Nicolas Sarkozy - must be beaming; Hollande is now the most unpopular president in French history. Paris remains great - but mostly for hordes of fleeting tourists from emerging markets, not for hordes of unemployed Parisians.

    So it’s Bandar Fabius to the rescue! Gulf petro-monarchy cash is the salvation. In thesis, this show of “independence” should translate into billions of euros in contracts and investments. It also helps that “incompetent” Hollande is on an official visit to Israel in the next few days.

    That pivot to Persia
    Forget about finding details of the real reasons for this “show of independence” in French mainstream media, apart from Le Monde Diplomatique’s Alain Gresh in his blog. [5]

    Explanations are absolutely pathetic. France is “alone against all”; it has shown “responsibility”; it has “reaffirmed its independence”. And of course all the blame lies on Kerry, who allegedly “came up with a text that nobody ever saw before”. Every shill has scrambled to cast Israeli-firster Fabius as savior. And yet the Elysee Palace has stressed that Fabius was just following Hollande’s orders - which, in thesis, meant renegotiating the “weak points” of the deal. Call it, essentially, “incompetent” Hollande showing Obama he’s got balls.
    (...)

    [3]
    ‘Israel will attack Iran if you sign the deal, French MP told Fabius’
    http://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-will-attack-if-you-sign-the-deal-french-mp-told-fabius
    Paris legislator Meyer Habib, a friend of Netanyahu, called his FM in Geneva to warn of likely response should accord be signed, Israeli TV reports
    By Times of Israel staff November 10, 2013, 8:53 pm

    [5] http://blog.mondediplo.net/2013-11-10-Nucleaire-iranien-la-France-s-oppose-a-une