organization:national security agency

  • Edward Snowden, Whistle-Blower - NYTimes.com

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/02/opinion/edward-snowden-whistle-blower.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20140102&

    Seven months ago, the world began to learn the vast scope of the National Security Agency’s reach into the lives of hundreds of millions of people in the United States and around the globe, as it collects information about their phone calls, their email messages, their friends and contacts, how they spend their days and where they spend their nights. The public learned in great detail how the agency has exceeded its mandate and abused its authority, prompting outrage at kitchen tables and at the desks of Congress, which may finally begin to limit these practices.

    –— ---

    ■ The N.S.A. broke federal privacy laws thousands of times per year

    ■ The agency broke into the communications links of major data centers around the world, allowing it to spy on hundreds of millions of user accounts and infuriating the Internet companies that own the centers.

    ■ The N.S.A. systematically undermined the basic encryption systems of the Internet, making it impossible to know if sensitive banking or medical data is truly private.

    ■ James Clapper Jr., the director of national intelligence, lied to Congress when testifying in March that the N.S.A. was not collecting data on millions of Americans.

    ■ The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court rebuked the N.S.A. for repeatedly providing misleading information about its surveillance practices, according to a ruling made public because of the Snowden documents.

    ■ A federal district judge ruled earlier this month that the phone-records-collection program probably violates the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution.

    #snowden #prism #nsa

  • Why Is ‘The_New Republic’ Taking Money From an NSA Contractor to Run Defenses of the NSA? | The Nation
    http://www.thenation.com/blog/177688/why-new-republic-taking-money-nsa-contractor-run-defenses-nsa

    The National Security Agency has a friend at the Harvard Law School. And at the Brookings Institution. And at The New Republic. And at The Washington Post.

    Benjamin Wittes, who is not a lawyer, is a senior fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution, where he is “Research Director in Public Law, and Co-Director of the Harvard Law School-Brookings Project on Law and Security.” He also has a Web site, Lawfare, where he’s been blogging on the report on the abuses of the National Security Agency just out from the President’s Review Group on Intelligence and Communication Technologies, in terms highly favorable to the super-secretive and media-shy agency. He also enjoys extraordinary access to the NSA, for instance in this series of podcasts with its top officials. (“We Brought In a Recoding Device So You Don’t Have To,” the series is titled—cute!)

    Why is Lawfare the NSA’s media portal of choice? Well, consider this. Lawfare, in turn, partners with The New Republic, where this post was republished in its entirety. The joint Lawfare/TNR project is titled “Security States,” and it is sponsored, Wittes proudly notes, by the Northrop Grumman Corporation. Grumman, in turn, is a major NSA contractor—see this $220 million deal it scored with the NSA “to develop an advanced information management and data storage system that will support efforts to modernize the nation’s electronic intelligence and broader signals intelligence capabilities,” a fact TNR does not disclose to its readers.

    And the NSA is apparently well-pleased with the arrangement. “Check out Lawfare’s interview with NSA’s acting Deputy Director Fran Fleisch,” the agency enthused today, one of the NSA’s public affairs office’s six breathless tweets booming “Lawfare” over the past five days. Surely they also enjoy the laundering of the content of “the indispensable Lawfare blog” through The Washington Post, courtesy of its hack right-wing blogger Jennifer Rubin. (“The NSA will falter unless Obama does his job.”)

    Meanwhile, Wittes’s Lawfare co-blogger Jack Goldsmith, late of George W. Bush’s Pentagon and Justice Department, is a professor at the Harvard Law School, but does not disclose any conflict of interest, as most Harvard Law professors do, for being part of such a project sponsored by a commercial entity.

    Let’s hear from Professor Goldsmith as to whether he is paid by Northrop for his posts at Lawfare, and whether he thinks he has disclosed that to his Harvard employers, and whether he should make the arrangement public. Let’s hear from The New Republic. Why is it taking money from an NSA contractor to run defenses of the NSA? I’ll be sending this post straightaway to TNR editor Franklin Foer, an old friend. And I’ll e-mail it too Professor Goldsmith, too. I’ll let you know what they say.

    #conflit_d’intérêt

  • Obama can’t point to a single time the NSA call records program prevented a terrorist attack
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/12/23/obama-cant-point-to-a-single-time-the-nsa-call-records-program-preve

    Obama and Co : Il n’y a pas eu de nouveau « 9/11 » parce qu’il n’y a eu aucune nouvelle tentative mais c’est quand même la #surveillance de la #NSA qui a empêché un nouveau « 9/11 »...

    National Security Agency defenders, including President Obama, continue to cite the terrorist attack on Sept. 11, 2001 when defending the program that scoops up domestic call records in bulk. But asked specifically, on Friday, if he could identify a time when that program stopped a similar attack, President Obama couldn’t. That’s because the program hasn’t prevented a second 9/11.

    But the lack of evidence that the program is effective will probably not prevent the NSA’s defenders from continuing to invoke 9/11 to protect the program. Another member of the task force, former acting CIA Director Michael Morell, on CBS’s “Face the Nation” on Sunday, admitted the group had found that “the program to date has not played a significant role in stopping terrorist attacks in the United States,” but earlier in his interview credited the NSA as one of the agencies responsible for the lack of successful terrorist attacks in the United States since 9/11.

  • Covert action in Colombia
    U.S. intelligence, GPS bomb kits help Latin American nation cripple rebel forces
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/investigative/2013/12/21/covert-action-in-colombia/?wpisrc=al_national

    The secret assistance, which also includes substantial eavesdropping help from the National Security Agency, is funded through a multibillion-dollar black budget. It is not a part of the public $9 billion package of mostly U.S. military aid called Plan Colombia, which began in 2000.

    The previously undisclosed #CIA program was authorized by President George W. Bush in the early 2000s and has continued under President Obama, according to U.S. military, intelligence and diplomatic officials. Most of those interviewed spoke on the condition of anonymity because the program is classified and ongoing.

    #Plan_Colombie, passeport pour la guerre
    http://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/cahier/ameriquelatine/plancolombie

  • Latest Snowden revelations expose Obama’s lies on NSA spy programs - World Socialist Web Site

    http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013/12/21/pers-d21.html

    Latest Snowden revelations expose Obama’s lies on NSA spy programs

    21 December 2013

    Just hours after receiving a report from his hand-picked advisory panel on National Security Agency surveillance operations, President Barack Obama used his end of the year press conference Friday to deliver an Orwellian defense of unrestrained US spying both at home and abroad.

    “I have confidence that the NSA is not engaging in domestic surveillance and snooping around,” Obama said, despite the cascade of revelations proving just the opposite. These revelations, including the latest from former NSA contractor Edward Snowden, have established that the agency is collecting and storing billions of files recording the phone calls, text messages, emails, Internet searches and even the daily movements of virtually ever US citizen, not to mention those of hundreds of millions of people abroad.

    `#prism #nsa #snowden

  • When will President #Obama get serious about #NSA reform?
    http://www.politico.com/story/2013/09/surveillance-obama-privacy-nsa-reform-96236.html

    Par Ken Roth de HRW

    Last week, President Obama met with the five-member review board that he recently appointed to review the National Security Agency’s (NSA) controversial electronic surveillance program. The review board is part of the president’s effort to build confidence in the surveillance program and its respect for privacy rights.

    But when Obama speaks about the program, he leaves the impression that its existing privacy protections are sufficient, if only we knew enough to appreciate them. That hardly instills confidence. If the president is serious about fixing the enormous overreach of U.S. surveillance that Edward Snowden helped to highlight, he should take these steps:

    (...)

  • Federal Judge: NSA’s ’Almost-Orwellian’ Data Collection Likely Violates Constitution
    http://www.thewire.com/politics/2013/12/federal-judge-nsas-almost-orwellian-phone-data-collection-likely-violates-constitution/356207

    For the first time, a public court has determined that the National Security Agency’s collection of #metadata on Americans’ phone calls probably violates the Constitution and should be stopped.

    That’s the short version of a ruling on the NSA’s bulk collection of phone records released by the D.C. District Court on Monday. The injunction ruling determined that the plaintiffs had standing to file a lawsuit — in other words, that they were affected by the NSA’s data collection — and that a court would likely find that the collection violated the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution. Given that the plaintiffs suffered « irreparable harm » from the data collection, the court determined that the data collection should be halted — though that order was withheld, pending appeal.

    Un tribunal de Washington juge les agissements de la #NSA illégaux
    http://www.rts.ch/info/monde/5462084-un-tribunal-de-washington-juge-les-agissements-de-la-nsa-illegaux.html

    Pour la première fois, le programme de #surveillance de l’agence américaine NSA a été jugé illégal par un tribunal, invoquant une « atteinte à la vie privée ».
    Un juge fédéral d’un tribunal civil de Washington a pour la première fois lundi infligé un revers au programme de surveillance de la NSA, estimant que la collecte de #métadonnées du téléphone d’un particulier constituait une « atteinte à la #vie_privée ».

    Dans une injonction préliminaire, le juge Richard Leon qualifie la collecte à grande échelle des métadonnées téléphoniques (numéros appelés, durée des appels...) sans feu vert préalable de la Justice d’"atteinte à la vie privée".

    Collecte des données interdite
    « Il est évident qu’un tel programme empiète » sur les valeurs défendues par le #quatrième_amendement de la #Constitution_américaine relatif à la protection de la vie privée, écrit le juge Leon.

    La Cour a interdit au gouvernement de collecter les métadonnées téléphoniques des deux plaignants. Si cette décision est remarquable de par son caractère inédit, le juge a cependant décidé de renvoyer le dossier vers une cour d’appel qui devra se prononcer sur le fond.

  • Blacked Out: Could Governments just Erase Dissidents from the Internet with a Click? | Informed Comment
    http://www.juancole.com/2013/12/governments-dissidents-internet.html

    What if Edward Snowden was made to disappear? No, I’m not suggesting some future CIA rendition effort or a who-killed-Snowden conspiracy theory of a disappearance, but a more ominous kind.

    What if everything a whistleblower had ever exposed could simply be made to go away? What if every National Security Agency (NSA) document Snowden released, every interview he gave, every documented trace of a national security state careening out of control could be made to disappear in real-time? What if the very posting of such revelations could be turned into a fruitless, record-less endeavor?

    #mémoire #dissidence #contrôle
    Am I suggesting the plot for a novel by some twenty-first century George Orwell? Hardly. As we edge toward a fully digital world, such things may soon be possible, not in science fiction but in our world — and at the push of a button. In fact, the earliest prototypes of a new kind of “disappearance” are already being tested. We are closer to a shocking, dystopian reality that might once have been the stuff of futuristic novels than we imagine. Welcome to the memory hole.

  • #NSA Split on Amnesty for #Snowden
    http://cryptome.org/2013/12/nsa-snowden-amnesty.htm

    CBS News learned Thursday that the information National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden has revealed so far is just a fraction of what he has. In fact, he has so much, some think it is worth giving him amnesty to get it back.

    Rick Leggett is the man who was put in charge of the Snowden leak task force by Gen. Keith Alexander, who heads the NSA. (...)

    GEN. KEITH ALEXANDER: This is analogous to a hostage-taker taking 50 people hostage, shooting 10 and then say, “If you give me full amnesty, I’ll let the other 40 go.” What do you do?

    (...) GEN. ALEXANDER: I do. I think people have to be held accountable for their actions.

    #LOL pour la dernière phrase

  • Do Antivirus Companies Whitelist #NSA Malware ?
    http://www.informationweek.com/security/vulnerabilities-and-threats/do-antivirus-companies-whitelist-nsa-malware/d/d-id/1112911

    Dear antivirus vendors: Are you aiding and abetting National Security Agency (NSA) spying?

    That’s the subject of an open letter, sent in October to leading antivirus vendors, from 25 different privacy information security experts and organizations. The letter asks the vendors to detail whether they’ve ever detected state-sponsored malware or received a government request to whitelist state-sponsored malware, and how they would respond to any such requests in the future.

    The letter, sent from Dutch digital rights foundation Bits of Freedom, requested that the firms respond by November 15. “Please let us know if you feel that you cannot, or cannot fully, answer any of the above questions because of legal constraints imposed upon you by any government,” it said.

    (...)

    ... it’s odd that US-based McAfee, Microsoft, and Symantec all failed to respond to Bits of Freedom’s letter before the deadline. (Siedsma at Bits of Freedom didn’t immediately respond to an emailed question about whether any have done so since then.) Ditto for Agnitum (Russia), Ahnlab (South Korea), Avast (Czech Republic), AVG (Czech Republic), and Bullguard (United Kingdom).

    #antivirus

  • Edward Snowden sharpened his hacking skills in Delhi - The Times of India

    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Edward-Snowden-sharpened-his-hacking-skills-in-Delhi/articleshow/26811526.cms

    BANGALORE: The hacker who shook the US intelligence machinery and had world leaders railing against Washington for spying on them picked up crucial skills in India. Edward Snowden, the National Security Agency contractor-turned-whistleblower, spent a week in New Delhi training in core Java programming and advanced ethical hacking. It’s this training that got him certified as an EC-Council Certified Security Analyst (ECSA).

    #snowden #prism

    • Moi je trouve ça intéressant un exemple du premier monde formé par le tiers monde. D’autant plus si ça a pu déclencher ce résultat (qui sait si le « advanced ethical hacking », ou l’environnement général de ces cours, n’a pas eu un effet sur sa décision ultérieure).

  • NSA tracking cellphone locations worldwide, Snowden documents show
    http://m.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/nsa-tracking-cellphone-locations-worldwide-snowden-documents-show/2013/12/04/5492873a-5cf2-11e3-bc56-c6ca94801fac_story.html

    The National Security Agency is gathering nearly 5 billion records a day on the whereabouts of cellphones around the world, according to top-secret documents and interviews with U.S. intelligence officials, enabling the agency to track the movements of individuals — and map their relationships — in ways that would have been previously unimaginable.

  • Top-Secret Document Reveals NSA Spied On Porn Habits As Part Of Plan To Discredit ’Radicalizers’
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/26/nsa-porn-muslims_n_4346128.html

    ❝WASHINGTON — The National Security Agency has been gathering records of online sexual activity and evidence of visits to pornographic websites as part of a proposed plan to harm the reputations of those whom the agency believes are radicalizing others through incendiary speeches , according to a top-secret NSA document. The document, provided by NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden, identifies six targets, all Muslims, as “exemplars” of how “personal vulnerabilities” can be learned through electronic surveillance, and then exploited to undermine a target’s credibility, reputation and authority.

    The NSA document, dated Oct. 3, 2012, repeatedly refers to the power of charges of hypocrisy to undermine such a messenger. “A previous SIGINT" — or signals intelligence, the interception of communications — "assessment report on radicalization indicated that radicalizers appear to be particularly vulnerable in the area of authority when their private and public behaviors are not consistent,” the document argues.

    Among the vulnerabilities listed by the NSA that can be effectively exploited are “ viewing sexually explicit material online” and “using sexually explicit persuasive language when communicating with inexperienced young girls .”

    The Director of the National Security Agency — described as “DIRNSA” — is listed as the “originator” of the document. Beyond the NSA itself, the listed recipients include officials with the Departments of Justice and Commerce and the Drug Enforcement Administration.

  • Spies worry over doomsday cache stashed by ex-NSA contractor Snowden | Reuters
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/11/25/us-usa-security-doomsday-idUSBRE9AO0Y120131125

    (Reuters) - British and U.S. intelligence officials say they are worried about a “doomsday ( une sorte de cache secrète, on entre dans du Stevenson )” cache of highly classified, heavily encrypted material they believe former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden has stored on a data cloud.

    The cache contains documents generated by the NSA and other agencies and includes names of U.S. and allied intelligence personnel, seven current and former U.S. officials and other sources briefed on the matter said.

    The data is protected with sophisticated encryption, and multiple passwords are needed to open it , said two of the sources, who like the others spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters.

    The passwords are in the possession of at least three different people and are valid for only a brief time window each day, they said . The identities of persons who might have the passwords are unknown.

    Spokespeople for both NSA and the U.S. Office of the Director of National Intelligence declined to comment.

    One source described the cache of still unpublished material as Snowden’s “insurance policy” against arrest or physical harm.

    #snowden #surveillance #encryption

  • House intel bill adds $75 million to #NSA budget to stop future Snowdens | Ars Technica
    http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/11/house-intel-bill-adds-75-million-to-nsa-budget-to-stop-future-snowdens

    On Thursday, the House Intelligence Committee approved a spending bill to fund the National Security Agency and other intelligence organizations. Included in the bill is a provision that would set aside $75 million for the NSA to improve its internal security and mitigate insider threats to classified material. In other words, the bill seeks to prevent future Edward Snowdens.

  • Exclusive : Inside America’s Plan to Kill Online Privacy Rights Everywhere
    http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/11/20/exclusive_inside_americas_plan_to_kill_online_privacy_rights

    Tout en proclamant publiquement son soutien, l’administration étasunienne agit en coulisses pour faire capoter une résolution non contraignante qui doit être votée à l’AG de l’ONU, visant à fixer un cadre légal à la #surveillance. Ce sont les alliés de ladite administration (Canada, Australie, Grande-Bretagne) qui sont chargés de mener la charge.

    The United States and its key intelligence allies are quietly working behind the scenes to kneecap a mounting movement in the United Nations to promote a universal human right to online privacy, according to diplomatic sources and an internal American government document obtained by The Cable.

    The diplomatic battle is playing out in an obscure U.N. General Assembly committee that is considering a proposal by Brazil and Germany to place constraints on unchecked internet surveillance by the National Security Agency and other foreign intelligence services. American representatives have made it clear that they won’t tolerate such checks on their global surveillance network. The stakes are high, particularly in Washington — which is seeking to contain an international backlash against NSA spying — and in Brasilia, where Brazilian President Dilma Roussef is personally involved in monitoring the U.N. negotiations.

    (...)

    Publicly, U.S. representatives say they’re open to an affirmation of privacy rights. “The United States takes very seriously our international legal obligations, including those under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,” Kurtis Cooper, a spokesman for the U.S. mission to the United Nations, said in an email. “We have been actively and constructively negotiating to ensure that the resolution promotes human rights and is consistent with those obligations.”

    But privately, American diplomats are pushing hard to kill a provision of the Brazilian and German draft which states that “extraterritorial surveillance” and mass interception of communications, personal information, and metadata may constitute a violation of human rights. The United States and its allies, according to diplomats, outside observers, and documents, contend that the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights does not apply to foreign espionage.

    In recent days, the United States circulated to its allies a confidential paper highlighting American objectives in the negotiations, “Right to Privacy in the Digital Age — U.S. Redlines.” It calls for changing the Brazilian and German text so “that references to privacy rights are referring explicitly to States’ obligations under ICCPR and remove suggestion that such obligations apply extraterritorially.” In other words: America wants to make sure it preserves the right to spy overseas.

    (...)

    The privacy resolution, like most General Assembly decisions, is neither legally binding nor enforceable by any international court. But international lawyers say it is important because it creates the basis for an international consensus — referred to as “soft law” — that over time will make it harder and harder for the United States to argue that its mass collection of foreigners’ data is lawful and in conformity with human rights norms.

    “They want to be able to say ‘we haven’t broken the law, we’re not breaking the law, and we won’t break the law,’” said Dinah PoKempner, the general counsel for Human Rights Watch, who has been tracking the negotiations. The United States, she added, wants to be able to maintain that “we have the freedom to scoop up anything we want through the massive surveillance of foreigners because we have no legal obligations.”

    • The Empire’s New Clothes
      Posted on November 21, 2013 by emptywheel
      http://www.emptywheel.net/2013/11/21/the-empires-new-clothes

      This is, then, in addition to being a perfect example of the Snowden effect, it’s also a perfect example of what Henry Farrell and Martha Finnemore have described in their essay on American hypocrisy and what I elaborated on here.

      US hegemony rests on a lot of things: the dollar exchange, our superlative military, our ideological lip service to democracy and human rights.

      But for the moment, it also rests on the globalized communication system in which we have a huge competitive advantage. That is, one reason we are the world’s hegemon is because the rest of the world communicates through us — literally, in terms of telecommunications infrastructure, linguistically, in English, and in terms of telecommunications governance.

      Aggressively hacking the rest of the world endangers that, both because of what it does to our ideological claims, but just as importantly, because it provides rivals with the concrete incentive to dismantle that global infrastructure.

      We’re opting to retain the ability to spy on everyone else, all using the increasingly flaccid claim of terrorism, all while pretending that simply endorsing this basic principle of human rights won’t devastate one tool of our Empire.

      But as the leak of these Redlines makes clear, we clearly do believe it would undermine the Empire.

    • Message to U.N. General Assembly: Stand up for Right to Privacy in the Digital Age
      https://www.accessnow.org/blog/2013/11/21/message-to-u.n.-general-assembly-stand-up-for-right-to-privacy-in-the-dig

      Privacy is intrinsically linked to freedom of expression and many other rights;

      The mere existence of domestic legislation is not all that is required to make surveillance lawful under international law;

      Indiscriminate mass surveillance is never legitimate as intrusions on privacy must always be genuinely necessary and proportionate;

      When States conduct extraterritorial surveillance, thereby exerting control over the privacy and rights of persons, they have obligations to respect privacy and related rights beyond the limits of their own borders;

      Privacy is also interfered with even when metadata and other third party communications are intercepted and collected.

    • UN: Reject Mass Surveillance | Human Rights Watch
      http://www.hrw.org/news/2013/11/21/un-reject-mass-surveillance

      After heated negotiations, the draft resolution on digital privacy initiated by Brazil and Germany emerged on November 20 relatively undamaged, despite efforts by the United States and other members of the “Five Eyes” group to weaken its language. Although a compromise avoided naming mass extraterritorial surveillance explicitly as a “human rights violation,” the resolution directs the UN high commissioner for human rights to report to the Human Rights Council and the General Assembly on the protection and promotion of privacy “in the context of domestic and extraterritorial surveillance... including on a mass scale.”

    • L’#ONU adopte une résolution contre l’#espionnage | Sous surveillance
      http://www.lapresse.ca/international/dossiers/sous-surveillance/201311/26/01-4714785-lonu-adopte-une-resolution-contre-lespionnage.php

      Le texte, adopté par consensus sans vote, avait été soumis notamment par l’Allemagne et le Brésil, dont les dirigeants avaient réagi très vivement aux révélations sur un vaste système d’espionnage organisé par les services de renseignement américains.

      La résolution a été co-parrainée par plusieurs autres pays européens et sud-américains, dont la France, l’Espagne, le Mexique, le Chili ou la Bolivie.

      Sans mettre en cause directement aucun pays, cette résolution non contraignante stipule que la surveillance et l’interception de données personnelles par des gouvernements ou des entreprises « sont susceptibles de violer les droits de l’homme ».

      Une première mouture du texte utilisait une formulation plus forte, mais a été édulcorée pour permettre aux États-Unis et à leurs proches alliés (Royaume-Uni, Australie, Nouvelle-Zélande) de se joindre au consensus.

      Le comité des droits de l’homme de l’Assemblée générale se déclare « profondément inquiet de l’impact négatif » que la surveillance et l’interception des communications peuvent avoir sur les droits de l’homme, « y compris la surveillance extra-territoriale ».

      La formulation initiale soutenue par l’Allemagne et le Brésil parlait de « violations des droits de l’homme qui peuvent résulter de toute surveillance de communications, dont la surveillance extra-territoriale des communications ».

      Pour l’ambassadeur allemand Peter Wittig, cette résolution, même non contraignante, constitue un important « message politique ». C’est la première fois selon lui que l’ONU affirme que « la surveillance illégale et arbitraire, à l’intérieur et au-delà des frontières, peut violer les droits de l’homme ».

      La résolution doit ensuite être soumise au vote de l’Assemblée en session plénière.

    • Les Nations Unies votent en faveur de la #vie_privée sur #Internet
      http://www.numerama.com/magazine/27845-les-nations-unies-votent-en-faveur-de-la-vie-privee-sur-internet.htm

      Les Nations Unies s’engagent en faveur de la vie privée. Ce mercredi, l’Assemblée générale a adopté une résolution sur le droit à la vie privée à l’ère numérique. Celle-ci invite tous les États membres de l’#ONU « à respecter et à protéger le droit à la vie privée, notamment dans le contexte de la communication numérique ». Mais dans les faits, cette décision n’est pas juridiquement contraignante.

      Le vote de l’Assemblée reprend en fait le texte adopté en novembre par la troisième commission de l’ONU, et dont le ton avait été adouci sous la pression des pays très actifs en matière d’espionnage (les « Five Eyes », à savoir les États-Unis, la Grande-Bretagne, l’Australie, le Canada et la Nouvelle-Zélande).

      Il est ainsi affirmé que « les droits dont les personnes jouissent hors ligne doivent également être protégés en ligne, y compris le droit à la vie privée ». Les États sont invités « à respecter pleinement toutes leurs obligations au regard du droit international ». En revanche, il n’est pas clairement indiqué que la collecte des données personnelles pouvait constituer une atteinte aux droits fondamentaux.

      Sans les mentionner directement, la résolution demande aux pays concernés de « revoir leurs procédures, leurs pratiques et leur législation relatives à la surveillance et à l’interception des communications, et à la collecte de données personnelles, notamment à grande échelle » et d’établir « des mécanismes nationaux de contrôle indépendants efficaces » pour encadrer, le cas échéant, des pratiques d’interception.

      Le texte adopté à l’ONU « prie par ailleurs la Haut-Commissaire des Nations Unies aux droits de l’homme de lui présenter [lors de la 79e session] un rapport d’activité sur la protection du droit à la vie privée dans le contexte de la surveillance et de l’interception des communications et de la collecte des données personnelles sur le territoire national et à l’extérieur, y compris à grande échelle ».

      Le Haut-Commissaire remettra ensuite un « rapport final » lors de la 80e session qui devra contenir « des vues et recommandations afin de récapituler et de préciser les principes, normes et meilleures pratiques qui permettent aux États de défendre leur sécurité tout en honorant les obligations que leur impose le droit international des droits de l’homme ».

      L’Assemblée générale des Nations Unies indique en effet que la surveillance des communications numériques « pourraient être contraires au droit à la vie privée et la liberté d’expression et d’opinion ».

  • Private firms selling mass #surveillance systems around world, documents show
    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/18/private-firms-mass-surveillance-technologies

    The papers show how firms, including dozens from Britain, tout the capabilities at private trade fairs aimed at offering nations in Africa, Asia and the Middle East the kind of powerful capabilities that are usually associated with government agencies such as GCHQ and its US counterpart, the National Security Agency.

    The market has raised concerns among human rights groups and ministers, who are poised to announce new rules about the sale of such equipment from Britain.

    “The government agrees that further regulation is necessary,” a spokesman for the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills said. “These products have legitimate uses … but we recognise that they may also be used to conduct espionage.”

    Ce que je trouve extraordinaire dans ce genre d’article (très commun) c’est qu’il soit demandé, avec véhémence s’il vous plait, aux gouvernements des pays (occidentaux) dont sont originaires les firmes privées de réguler le marché pour empêcher les violations des droits humains, alors même que lesdits gouvernements espionnent illégalement et sans motif non seulement leurs propres citoyens mais aussi les citoyens étrangers.

  • Pauvre #NSA : elle croule sous les demandes d’information.
    La faute à #Snowden !

    NSA grapples with 988% increase in records requests
    http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/17/nsa-grapples-with-988-increase-in-open-records-requests/3519889

    Fueled by the Edward Snowden scandal, more Americans than ever are asking the NSA if their personal life is being spied on.

    And the NSA has a very direct answer for them: Tough luck, we’re not telling you.

    Americans are inundating the National Security Agency with open-records requests, leading to a 988% increase in such inquiries. Anyone asking is getting a standard pre-written letter saying the NSA can neither confirm nor deny that any information has been gathered.

    Le nombre de demandes explose : multiplié par 10
    2012T4 : 257
    2013T1 : 241
    2013T2 : 1302
    2013T3 : 2538

    Seulement 19 personnes pour traiter les demandes. Le retard s’accumule…

    Her 19-person staff is grappling to deal with the boom in requests, she said. More than 900 are still pending, although the NSA tries to get back to people in the 20 days required by law, she said.

    … il faut donc parfois attendre longtemps la réponse…

    Sometimes it can take months, even years, to get a response.

    Even after a long wait, the agency for the most part is sharing nothing about the topic people want the most information about.

    … qui de toutes façons sera :

    Tough luck, we’re not telling you .

  • #NSA Leaks Could Inspire a Global Boom in Intrusive #Surveillance | MIT Technology Review
    http://www.technologyreview.com/view/521561/nsa-leaks-could-inspire-a-global-boom-in-intrusive-surveillance

    Reports of the National Security agency’s surveillance programs (...) will prove inspirational [to governments and security services in developing economies,] according to a report (...) from the University of Toronto’s Citizen Lab, which studies online security and privacy.

    (...)

    Ron Deibert, director of Citizen Lab, (...) says that many companies already face “complex” and “frustrating” requests from “newly emerging markets” for data on their users. He believes that the NSA revelations will cause those to become even more common, with unwelcome results.

    (...)

    India, the United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia, for example, have already demanded that BlackBerry add interception technology to its services, notes Deibert. He says that insisting that companies add such “backdoors” to their services introduces serious security risks, because they could be discovered and abused by others.

  • Deutsche Telekom Pushes All German Internet Safe from Spying - SPIEGEL ONLINE
    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/deutsche-telekom-pushes-all-german-internet-safe-from-spying-a-933013.html

    Recent revelations about NSA spying have given fresh impetus to the dream of a purely German Internet. Deutsche Telekom believes it could introduce a system safe from prying foreign surveillance, but some criticize the plan as pointless.

    Even before it emerged that the National Security Agency had wiretapped her mobile phone, German ChancellorAngela Merkel was calling for the Internet to have something like Airbus — a joint European initiative able to compete with the dominance of American and Chinese high-tech companies, just as Airbus does with the US aerospace giant Boeing.

    Currently, the global market for software and online services is firmly in American hands. What’s more, American corporations, such as Google, are subject to the Patriot Act, which requires them to allow American intelligence agencies access to their data centers.
    On the other hand, the equipment that directs traffic on the Internet often comes from China — for example, routers made by Huawei. “No one can be certain that there isn’t spying technology built in there as well,” warns Norbert Pohlmann, chair of the IT Security Association Germany (TeleTrust).

    The new plan would foster more than just German IT start-ups. The simple message politicians and businesses are selling to the general public is that, in the best-case scenario, data shouldn’t leave its home country at all, so as not to be susceptible to monitoring or interception by foreign powers.

  • BEN FRANKLIN WAS RIGHT ABOUT THE NSA
    http://ericmargolis.com/2013/11/ben-franklin-was-right-about-the-nsa

    In 1975, I was invited to join the US Senate’s Church Committee that was formed after the Watergate scandals. Its goal was to investigate massive illegalities committed by the CIA, National Security Agency and FBI.

    As a then staunch Republican, and having worked on President Nixon’s reelection campaign developing Mideast policy, I declined.

    With the wisdom of hindsight, I should have joined the investigation.

    Senator Frank Church warned: “ If this government ever became a tyrant, if a dictator ever took charge in this country, the technological capacity that the intelligence community has given the government could enable it to impose total tyranny, and there would be no way to fight back because the most careful effort to combine together in resistance to the government, no matter how privately it was done, is within the reach of the government to know. “

    The Church Committee revealed Washington’s role in the assassinations of foreign leaders, CIA collaboration with the Mafia, wide scale subversion around the globe, mail and phone intercepts, spying on Americans by the US Army and intelligence services, collusion with right-wing terrorist groups like Gladio, and much, much more.

    Edward Snowden’s revelations of NSA malfeasance have done much the same thing today. Both Church and Snowden were branded traitors by rightwing zealots and flag-wavers. Government security agencies were reined in for decades. But it’s now clear they are not only back to their old tricks, but are out of control.

  • « Les révélations d’Edward Snowden concernant l’ampleur de l’espionnage réalisé par la NSA ont entraîné des changements de direction à pas mal d’endroits. Par exemple, l’IETF, l’organisation qui établit les normes techniques de l’Internet. À la réunion de l’IETF à Vancouver, du 3 au 8 novembre, on a donc beaucoup parlé de vie privée. La décision la plus spectaculaire a été l’accord très large de l’IETF (par le biais du fameux "hum", l’IETF n’ayant pas de procédures de vote) pour se lancer à fond dans cette voie. »

    http://linuxfr.org/users/bortzmeyer/journaux/l-ietf-se-lance-dans-la-lutte-contre-l-espionnage

    #NSA #PRISM #vie_privée

    • Al Gore: Snowden ’revealed evidence’ of crimes against US constitution | theguardian.com
      http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/06/al-gore-snowden-revealed-evidence-crimes-nsa

      Former US vice-president Al Gore has described the activities of the National Security Agency as “outrageous” and “completely unacceptable” and said whistleblower Edward Snowden has “revealed evidence” of crimes against the US constitution.

      Gore, speaking Tuesday night at McGill University in Montreal, said he was in favour of using surveillance to ensure national security, but Snowden’s revelations showed that those measures had gone too far.

      “I say that as someone who was a member of the National Security Council working in the White House and getting daily briefings from the CIA,” Gore said, in comments reported by the Canadian Press.

  • #NSA, #GCHQ spy on Middle East via Cyprus: reports
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/nsa-gchq-spy-middle-east-cyprus-reports

    Protesters hold up placards as Director of National Security Agency (NSA) and Commander of US Cyber Command General Keith Alexander (L), Director of National Intelligence James Clapper (C) and Deputy Attorney General James Cole (R) arrive to testify before the House (Select) Intelligence Committee in Washington, DC, October 29, 2013. (Photo: AFP - Jim Watson)

    US and British spy agencies rely on a data transmission center in Cyprus to intercept phone and Internet (...)

    #Edward_Snowden #Espionage #privacy #Top_News

  • Glenn Greenwald out at ’The Guardian’, will launch new media venture
    http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2013/10/glenn-greenwald-out-at-the-guardian-will-launch-new-175132.html

    Glenn Greenwald, the reporter who broke the National Security Agency surveillance story, is leaving The Guardian to start what he described as “very substantial new media outlet," BuzzFeed’s Ben Smith reported on Tuesday.

    The new venture, described by a source familiar with it as “rather extraordinary,” will be web-based and funded by a philanthropist, POLITICO has learned.

    In his interview with Smith, Greenwald said it would have major financial backing and would have hubs in New York City, Washington, D.C., and San Francisco. He disclosed no further details, but called the venture “momentous” and said it will be "be unveiled very shortly.”

  • How Lavabit Melted Down : The New Yorker
    http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/10/how-lavabit-edward-snowden-email-service-melted-down.html

    On August 8th, Lavabit, newly famous for being the secure e-mail service used by the National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden, went dark. Its owner and operator, Ladar Levison, replaced its home page with a message: “I cannot share my experiences over the last six weeks, even though I have twice made the appropriate requests.” Levison could write only that he chose to shut down the company rather than “become complicit in crimes against the American people,” and he promised to “fight for the Constitution in the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals.”

    #lavabit #nsa #snowden #PRISM