organization:naval analyses military advisory board

Le Pentagone n’a jamais nié le changement climatique, bien au contraire, mais jusque-là dans une optique essentiellement sécuritaire comme le fait remarquer depuis un certain temps Paul Rogers :
▻http://www.oxfordresearchgroup.org.uk/publications/monthly_briefings/climate_change_and_security

Much of the analysis on climate change coming from military sources produces results that coincide with the ideas of radical environmental analysts, pointing to the social and political consequences, the risks of state failure and the rise of radical oppositional movements.

However, when it comes to responses, the primary military focus is on maintaining the security of the state, either on its own or in alliance with others. This is to be expected and is legitimate from the perspective of a military organisation – its reason for being is to keep the state secure. Thus, the emphasis may be on increased border security and the patrolling of potential migratory routes, and the intervention capabilities necessary to stabilise failing states and ungoverned space that may be a consequence of the impact of climate change.

What this almost never involves, is advocating the primary preventative measure that is required for responding to climate change – a rapid move towards an ultra-low carbon economy.