organization:shia

  • EX-CIA DIRECTOR WHO ENDORSED CLINTON CALLS FOR KILLING IRANIANS AND RUSSIANS IN SYRIA
    https://theintercept.com/2016/08/09/ex-cia-chief-who-endorsed-clinton-calls-for-killing-iranians-and-russi

    FORMER ACTING CIA Director Michael Morell said in an interview Monday that U.S. policy in Syria should be to make Iran and Russia “pay a price” by arming local groups and instructing them to kill Iranian and Russian personnel in the country.

    Morell was appearing on the Charlie Rose show on PBS in the wake of his publicly endorsing Hillary Clinton on the New York Times opinion pages.

    Clinton has expressed support for increased military intervention in Syria against Bashar al-Assad’s Syrian government. Iran and Russia are backing Assad.

    “What they need is to have the Russians and Iranians pay a little price,” Morell said. “When we were in Iraq, the Iranians were giving weapons to the Shia militia, who were killing American soldiers, right? The Iranians were making us pay a price. We need to make the Iranians pay a price in Syria. We need to make the Russians pay a price.”

  • Modern Mongols: Sunni Arabs outraged at Iran role in Iraqi Gov’t Fallujah Campaign
    http://www.juancole.com/2016/05/outraged-fallujah-campaign.html

    BBC Monitoring surveyed the Arabic press on 27 May for the issue of the Iranian role in the Iraq government campaign to take Fallujah from Daesh (ISIS, ISIL). Although Saudi and other newspapers say they want to see Daesh defeated, they are deeply critical of the Shiite militias or Popular Mobilization Forces, alleging that they use indiscriminate fire and create high numbers of civilian casualties when operating in Sunni Arab areas.

    Fallujah is a storied Iraqi Sunni stronghold of several hundreds of thousands of residents, the “city of minarets.” It fell to Daesh in January of 2014, and I think it is fair to say that there is much more angst in the Sunni Arab world about its liberation at the hands of Iran-backed Shiites than there has been about Daesh’s brutal occupation of the city.

    • En fait, cette inquiétude sectaire est très largement distillée par les médias occidentaux. Par exemple le NY Times (28 mai) :

      Iran-Led Push to Retake Falluja From ISIS Worries U.S.
      http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/29/world/middleeast/iran-led-push-to-retake-falluja-from-isis-worries-us.html

      But it worries that an assault on the city could backfire — inflaming the same sectarian sentiments that have allowed the Islamic State to flourish there.

      Au passage, et de manière particulièrement typique et écœurante, l’article édulcore absolument les massacres à perpétrés par les américains à Falloujah en 2004 :

      For the United States, there is also the matter of history: Led by the Marines, its forces fought two bloody battles for Falluja in 2004.

      […]

      The American military’s assault on Falluja in April of 2004 was in retaliation for an episode that became an early symbol of a war spiraling out of control, the image of it as indelible as it was gruesome: the bodies of four Blackwater contractors dangling from the ironwork of a bridge.

      Tu lis ça et tu aurais l’impression qu’à Falloujah en 2004, les victimes étaient ces pauvres mercenaires bushistes de Blackwater…

      C’est typiquement ce genre de négationnisme historique distillé par un de ses plus grands médias qui autorise désormais les « U.S. » à s’« inquiéter » de la façon de mener la guerre en Irak.

      Accessoirement : article négationniste immédiatement relayé par Kenneth Roth, qui ne déçoit jamais :
      https://twitter.com/KenRoth/status/737261631663681540

      Fear of sectarian retaliation as Shia militia join Iraqi security forces to retake Fallujah.

  • Après Kunduz, Homs, Haydan, Taiz : Sadeh
    Yemen : Another MSF supported hospital bombed | Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) International
    http://www.msf.org/article/yemen-another-msf-supported-hospital-bombed

    Sana’a – An MSF supported hospital has been hit by a projectile in Northern Yemen causing at least four dead and 10 injured and the collapse of several buildings of the medical facility. Three of the injured are MSF staff, two in critical condition.

    (...) “All warring parties, including the Saudi led coalition (SLC), are regularly informed of the GPS coordinates of the medical sites where MSF works and we are in constant dialogue with them to ensure that they understand the severity of the humanitarian consequences of the conflict and the need to respect the provision of medical services”, says Raquel Ayora Director of Operations. “There is no way that anyone with the capacity to carry out an airstrike or launch a rocket would not have known that the Shiara Hospital was a functioning health facility providing critical services and supported by MSF”.

    #arabie_saoudite #yémen #MSF

  • PHOTOS : A modern genocide — Yazidi survivors in #Shingal

    In August 2014 the extremist group calling itself Islamic State (ISIS) swept through a part of northern Iraq inhabited by the Yazidi religious minority. ISIS had already broadcast to the world their intention to exterminate “un-believers” and those they opposed. They had massacred 1,600 Shia army cadets at Camp Speicher on June 12, 2014 and ordered all Christians to convert or leave their homes through the areas they controlled. In August the crimes became even more brutal as they massacred men and elderly Yazidi women and sold an estimated 5,000 women into slavery. Many Yazidis describe the mass killings as a genocide. Seventeen mass graves were found around the town of Shingal (Sinjar in Arabic), after it was liberated by Kurdish peshmerga forces. In mid-December of 2015, a year and a half after the massacres, I went to northern Iraq see for myself.


    http://972mag.com/photos-a-modern-genocide-yazidi-survivors-in-shingal/115479
    #génocide #Yézidis #Irak #fosses_communes #ISIS #EI #Etat_islamique #Kurdistan #massacres #photographie
    cc @albertocampiphoto

  • IS, Shia militia claim attack on Turkish troops in Iraqi camp | Middle East Eye
    http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/shia-militia-claim-attack-turkish-troops-iraqi-camp-1025482601

    Four Turkish soldiers were wounded on Wednesday when militants fired mortars on a training camp near the Iraqi city of Mosul, Turkish officials said, in an attack that was claimed by both Islamic State militants and Shia militiamen.

    Two Iraqi volunteers, one of them an officer, were killed in the attack on the Bashiqa camp, where Iraqi anti-IS fighters are being trained with Turkish help.

    “We offer condolences to our Iraqi martyr brothers’ families and the Iraqi people, and wish the injured a speedy recovery,” the Turkish foreign ministry said in a statement.

    IS - which counts Mosul as its main Iraqi hub - claimed responsibility for the assault in a statement posted online, although it said it used rockets rather than mortars.

    “Soldiers of the caliphate were able to launch 200 Grad rockets,” the statement said in reference to the Islamic “caliphate” the militant group has declared in parts of Iraq and Syria.
    – See more at: http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/shia-militia-claim-attack-turkish-troops-iraqi-camp-1025482601#sthash

  • Nigerian Shiites say soldiers have killed hundreds
    http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/World/2015/Dec-14/327306-nigerian-shiites-say-soldiers-have-killed-hundreds.ashx

    Nigeria’s Muslim Shiite movement says Nigerian troops have killed hundreds of its members in a northern town, but other reports put the number of dead at about 20.

    The killings happened this weekend in Zaria, a town in which, according to the military, the Muslim group tried to kill Nigeria’s army chief by stoning his convoy.

    The dead from the military raids included the wife and two sons of the Shia Islamic Movement leader, Ibraheem Zakzaky.

    Witness Ojo Momodu said the Shiites barricaded a main road with burning tires as Gen. Tukur Buratai approached Saturday and then pelted his convoy with stones.

    Army spokesman Col. Sani Usman called it “a deliberate attempt to assassinate” the general.

    The movement’s spokesman, Ibrahim Musa, said the military retaliated with “indiscriminate killing.”

    • Nigerian Army Kills 300 Minority Shia
      http://www.mintpressnews.com/nigerian-army-kills-300-shias/212079

      The annual religious procession of Nigeria’s Shi’ite minority seems to get attacked by the Nigerian military every year. Last year, the attack during the procession killed 30 demonstrators, including three children of the group’s spiritual leader.

      This year, Shi’ite protesters held an advanced demonstration before the religious process, slamming military attacks against them and throwing rocks at the convoy of a general involved in last year’s crackdown, a move which the Nigerian military labeled an “assassination attempt.” They claimed the Shi’ites were armed with “swords and daggers.”

      So once again, the military moved against the Shi’ites in force this weekend, killing around 300 according to the Shi’ite movement. The exact toll could not be determined, however, as the Nigerian military took all the bodies with them when they left.

  • Iraqi Sunnis join Shia militias to fight IS militants | Middle East Eye
    http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/iraqi-sunnis-join-shiite-militias-fight-militants-520291754

    Many new Sunni battalions, each one consisting of 250-600 fighters, have been formed in the Sunni areas in Diyala province east of Baghdad, the Sunni-dominated province of Anbar and Salahudeen province, the home town of the former Iraqi president, Saddam Hussein.

    These battalions have linked to Badr, Kataib Hezbollah-Iraq, Asaib Ahl al-Haq, al-Nujabaa (a split group of Asaib), Jund al-Imam (a new Shia militia formed last year), Ali al-Akbar Bregaid (a new Shiiite militia formed a few months ago), and Kataib Sayyid al-Shuhada (a new Shia militia).

    “From the beginning we thought there was no way to liberate our lands, but by getting the help of Iraqis, not relying on the United States nor any other countries, so we joined the Popular Mobilisation,” Khalid Abdullah, the commander of Asaib Ahl al-Haq Sunni Battalion in Salahudeen told MEE by phone.
    – See more at: http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/iraqi-sunnis-join-shiite-militias-fight-militants-520291754#sthash.TY

  • Les #Etats-Unis envisagent l’installation de nouvelles #bases en #Irak
    http://www.lemonde.fr/proche-orient/article/2015/06/12/les-etats-unis-envisagent-l-installation-de-nouvelles-bases-en-irak_4652511_

    Selon le porte-parole du #Pentagone, le colonel Steve Warren, la nouvelle base d’Al-Taqadoum, située dans la province d’Al-Anbar, annoncée mardi, et qui comptera 450 militaires américains, pourrait être la première d’une série de nouvelles bases américaines en Irak. « Ce que nous faisons à Al-Taqadoum est quelque chose que nous envisageons de faire ailleurs », a-t-il déclaré, jeudi 11 juin.

    La Maison Blanche a toutefois immédiatement souligné que rien n’était encore décidé. « Il n’y a pas de plans immédiats » pour de nouvelles bases, a souligné le porte-parole de la Maison Blanche Josh Earnest. Trois semaines après la chute de Ramadi, désormais aux mains des djihadistes de l’EI qui contrôlent de vastes pans de territoire en Irak, Barack Obama a annoncé mercredi un renforcement prudent du dispositif américain sur place.

    [...]

    Le chef d’état-major interarmées américain, le général Dempsey, a également évoqué la possibilité de nouveaux sites d’implantation américaine après Al-Taqadoum, au fur et à mesure de la reconquête du pays par l’armée irakienne, selon un article du site d’information officiel du Pentagone.

    Au fur et à mesure que les troupes irakiennes avanceront et s’éloigneront des bases déjà existantes, il peut être nécessaire d’en établir de nouvelles dans le cadre d’une stratégie du « #nénuphar », a-t-il estimé en substance. « Nous regardons tout le temps si d’autres sites pourraient être nécessaires », a-t-il expliqué. « Je pourrais en voir un dans le couloir Bagdad-Tikrit-Kirkouk vers Mossoul », la grande ville du nord de l’Irak.

    #Lily_pads

    • Dans son édito, ABA y voit une façon de reprendre pied sur le terrain, ainsi que le prélude à la création de milices populaires sunnites, dont le premier objectif sera de taper sur la tronche de leurs concitoyens chiites, tout aussi déterminés à le faire.

    • The Dangers of a Re-Ignited American-Shia Conflict in Iraq
      https://suite.io/paul-iddon/6pqg285

      The United States is also very reluctant about assisting Iranian-backed Shia militia forces in Iraq, even if against the common enemy that is ISIS. The feeling appears to be mutual, at least a considerable number of these Shia militias view the United States as their enemy, or at least a potential adversary, in this fight and some even seem to genuinely believe that the U.S. air strikes in Iraq are launched in active support of ISIS (one such Shia militant even went so far as firing at a U.S. helicopter, apparently motivated to do so by his belief in such theories).

      One such Shia militia presently fighting in Anbar is the Iranian-backed Harakat Nujaba militia. Their leader has blamed the deaths of an allied Shia militia (the Asaib al Haq, League of the Righteous, militia) in a recent explosion on the United States and has said that he and his allies will extract “vengeance”. The U.S. denies that it had undertaken an air strike in the area those militants were killed. Nevertheless the charge has been made and comes not long after Muqtada al-Sadr himself threatened last May to target U.S. interests in Iraq if Washington began to directly arm Iraq’s Sunni Arabs and Kurds – instead of having the central government allot arm deliveries to those forces as par the hitherto standard procedure. That particular incident aptly demonstrated the very real underlying tensions which still exist between the United States and vocal elements within the Shia community in Iraq.

  • L’enlèvement de Richard Engel en décembre 2012 par des « miliciens chiites » était bien un bidonnage organisé par des rebelles. Ici l’intéressé s’explique (et se dédouanant de toute responsabilité) : New Details on 2012 Kidnapping of NBC News Team in Syria
    http://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/new-details-2012-kidnapping-nbc-news-team-syria-n342356

    Here is what we found based on facts gathered from dozens of sources inside and outside of Syria, including two sources with first-hand knowledge of events:

    – The group that kidnapped us was Sunni, not Shia.
    – The group that kidnapped us put on an elaborate ruse to convince us they were Shiite Shabiha militiamen.
    – The group that kidnapped us was a criminal gang with shifting allegiances.
    – The group that freed us also had ties to the kidnappers.

    À l’époque (décembre 2012 donc), As‘ad Abukhalil avait pourtant indiqué que la vidéo était visiblement une fabrication :
    http://angryarab.blogspot.fr/2015/04/my-early-skeptical-reaction-to-richard.html

    J’avais aussi signalé à ce moment que l’« enlèvement de Richard Engel sent mauvais » :
    http://seenthis.net/messages/104482

    • How NBC Knowingly Let Syria Rebels’ False War Propaganda Stand For Years
      http://m.thenation.com/blog/204625-how-nbc-knowingly-let-syria-rebels-false-war-propaganda-stand-ye

      The prevailing narrative held that, as Engel reported immediately after he was freed, a group of Shia militiamen loyal to Basher Assad’s embattled government had kidnapped and mistreated the star reporter and his colleagues. Engel pointed to the language his captors used and other pronounced signs of their allegiances, ranging from graffiti scrawled on the wall of their prison to the coffee cups they drank from.

      But the narrative was false, a set-up by a Sunni rebel group opposing Assad. That much became clear on Wednesday night, when NBC quietly posted a piece to its website where Engel corrected the record. “The group that kidnapped us was Sunni, not Shia,” Engel wrote. Curiously, the piece is posited as producing “new details” about the attack, not as a correction; there was no retraction of or apology for earlier errors in reporting, as is customary.

  • Patrick Cockburn · Whose side is Turkey on?: The Battle for Kobani · LRB 6 November 2014
    http://www.lrb.co.uk/v36/n21/patrick-cockburn/whose-side-is-turkey-on

    Ankara gave its support to jihadi groups financed by the Gulf monarchies: these included al-Nusra, al-Qaida’s Syrian affiliate, and Isis. Turkey played much the same role in supporting the jihadis in Syria as Pakistan had done supporting the Taliban in Afghanistan. The estimated 12,000 foreign jihadis fighting in Syria, over which there is so much apprehension in Europe and the US, almost all entered via what became known as ‘the jihadis’ highway’, using Turkish border crossing points while the guards looked the other way. In the second half of 2013, as the US put pressure on Turkey, these routes became harder to access but Isis militants still cross the frontier without too much difficulty. The exact nature of the relationship between the Turkish intelligence services and Isis and al-Nusra remains cloudy but there is strong evidence for a degree of collaboration. When Syrian rebels led by al-Nusra captured the Armenian town of Kassab in Syrian government-held territory early this year, it seemed that the Turks had allowed them to operate from inside Turkish territory. Also mysterious was the case of the 49 members of the Turkish Consulate in Mosul who stayed in the city as it was taken by Isis; they were held hostage in Raqqa, the Islamic State’s Syrian capital, then unexpectedly released after four months in exchange for Isis prisoners held in Turkey.

    • En effet...

      "The replacement of Nouri al-Maliki’s corrupt and dysfunctional government by Haider al-Abadi hasn’t made as much difference as its foreign backers would like. Because the army is performing no better than before, the main fighting forces facing Isis are the Shia militias. Highly sectarian and often criminalised, they are fighting hard around Baghdad to drive back Isis and cleanse mixed areas of the Sunni population. Sunnis are often picked up at checkpoints, held for ransoms of tens of thousands of dollars and usually murdered even when the money is paid. Amnesty International says that the militias, including the Badr Brigade and Asaib Ahl al Haq, operate with total immunity; it has accused the Shia-dominated government of ‘sanctioning war crimes’. With the Iraqi government and the US paying out big sums of money to businessmen, tribal leaders and anybody else who says they will fight Isis, local warlords are on the rise again: between twenty and thirty new militias have been created since June. This means that Iraqi Sunnis have no choice but to stick with Isis. The only alternative is the return of ferocious Shia militiamen who suspect all Sunnis of supporting the Islamic State. Having barely recovered from the last war, Iraq is being wrecked by a new one. Whatever happens at Kobani, Isis is not going to implode. Foreign intervention will only increase the level of violence and the Sunni-Shia civil war will gather force, with no end in sight."

  • Syria and Iraq : Why US policy is fraught with danger
    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/syria-and-iraq-us-policy-is-fraught-with-danger-9722276.html
    Patrick Cockburn

    En Irak, le nouveau gouvernement est à peine moins sectaire que le précédent,

    The new [Iraqi] government may be less divisive than the old one – it would be difficult to be more – but only to a limited degree.

    ... the Sunni are more terrified of the return of vengeful Iraqi government forces than they are of Isis.

    They have reason to be frightened since revenge killing of Sunni are taking place in Amerli, the Shia Turkoman town whose two-month siege by Isis was broken last month by Shia and Kurdish fighters aided by US air strikes. Mass graves of Shia truck drivers murdered by Isis are being excavated and local Sunni are being killed in retaliation. The family of a 21-year-old Sunni man abducted by militiamen was soon afterwards offered his headless body back in return for $2,000 (£1,240).

    In the 127 villages retaken by the Kurds from Isis under the cover of US air strikes, the Sunni Arab population has mostly fled and is unlikely to return. Often Sunni houses are burnt by Shia militiamen and in one village Kurdish fighters had reportedly sprayed over the word “apostate” placed there by Isis and instead written “Kurdish home”.

    (...)

    En Syrie, la #CIA, peu convaincue par les « modérés » des wahhabites, a constitué ses propres « modérés »,

    Isis will be difficult to defeat in Iraq because of Sunni sectarian solidarity. But the reach of Isis in Iraq is limited by the fact that Sunni Arabs are only 20 per cent of the 33 million population. In Syria, by way of contrast, Sunni Arabs make up at least 60 per cent of Syrians, so Isis’s natural constituency is larger than in Iraq. Motorised Isis columns have been advancing fast here, taking some 35 per cent of the country and inflicting defeats both on other Syrian opposition fighters, notably Jabhat al-Nusra, the al-Qaeda affiliate, and on the Syrian army. Isis is now within 30 miles of Aleppo, the largest city in Syria before the war.

    (...)

    The US is now desperately trying to persuade Turkey to close the border effectively, but so far has only succeeded in raising the price charged by local guides taking people across the frontier from $10 to $25 a journey.

    (...)

    ... Mr Obama (...) will (...) step up a pretence that there is a potent “moderate” armed opposition in Syria, capable of fighting both Isis and the Syrian government at once. Unfortunately, this force scarcely exists in any strength and the most important rebel movements opposed to Isis are themselves jihadis such as #Jabhat_al-Nusra, #Ahrar_al-Sham and the #Islamic_Front. Their violent sectarianism is not very different to that of Isis.

    Lacking a moderate military opposition to support as an alternative to Isis and the Assad government, the US has moved to raise such a force under its own control. The Free Syrian Army (FSA), once lauded in Western capitals as the likely military victors over Mr Assad, largely collapsed at the end of 2013. The FSA military leader, General Abdul-Ilah al Bashir, who defected from the Syrian government side in 2012, said in an interview with the McClatchy news agency last week that the CIA had taken over direction of this new moderate force. He said that “the leadership of the FSA is American”, adding that since last December US supplies of equipment have bypassed the FSA leadership in Turkey and been sent directly to up to 14 commanders in northern Syria and 60 smaller groups in the south of the country. Gen Bashir said that all these FSA groups reported directly to the CIA. Other FSA commanders confirmed that the US is equipping them with training and weapons including TOW anti-tank missiles.

    It appears that, if the US does launch air strikes in Syria, they will be nominally in support of the FSA which is firmly under US control. The US is probably nervous of allowing weapons to be supplied to supposed moderates by Saudi Arabia and the Gulf monarchies which end up in the hands of Isis. The London-based small arms research organisation Conflict Armament Research said in a report this week that anti-tank rockets used by Isis in Syria were “identical to M79 rockets transferred by Saudi Arabia to forces operating under the Free Syrian Army umbrella in 2013”.

    In Syria and in Iraq Mr Obama is finding that his policy of operating through local partners, whose real aims may differ markedly from his own, is full of perils.

    • For US, finding right allies in Syria will be tough
      Hannah Allam
      http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/09/11/239590_turkish-aid-to-al-qaida-linked.html

      Yet the Syrian Opposition Coalition, the closest thing Obama has to an alternative to the Assad government, called the explosion that killed the jihadists a deliberate attempt to “silence the voice of #moderation.” Only in polarized Syria, with the Islamic State skewing the curve, could such a group seriously be considered mainstream.

      #Syrie #modérés

    • Joshua Landis :
      http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/9/15/why-syria-is-thegordianknotofobamasantiisilcampaign.html

      U.S. intelligence estimates that Syrian rebels are organized into more than 1,500 groups of widely varying political leanings. They control a little less than 20 percent of Syrian territory. Those designated as moderate rebel forces control less than 5 percent of Syria. To arm and fund them without first unifying them under a single military and political command would be to condemn Syria to rebel chaos.

      The U.S. is arming and funding 12 to 14 militias in northern Syria and 60 more groups in the south, according to the head of the Syrian Opposition Coalition. These militias have not, thus far, been particularly successful on the battlefield, and none has national reach. Most are based on one charismatic commander or a single region and have not articulated clear ideologies. All depend on foreign money.

      The vast majority of Syria’s rebel groups have been deemed too Islamist, too sectarian and too anti-democratic by the U.S. — and these are the groups ranged against the ISIL. They span the Salafist ideological gamut, from al-Qaeda’s Nusra Front to the 40,000-strong conglomeration of rebel forces united under the banner of the Islamic Front. Despite U.S. skepticism, some of the Sunni Arab regimes Obama has courted as key allies in the anti-ISIL effort have worked with these groups.

      Gulf countries reportedly poured money into the Islamic Front until the U.S. convinced them to stop. Islamic Front leaders decried democracy as the “dictatorship of the strong” and called for building an Islamic state. Zahran Alloush, the military chief of the Islamic Front spooked Americans by insisting that Syria be “cleansed of Shias and Alawites.” The newly appointed head of Ahrar al-Sham and the political chief of the Islamic Front earned his stripes in the ranks of the Iraqi insurgency fighting the U.S.

      Turkey insists that the U.S. arm these anti-ISIL Islamist rebel groups, including the Nusra Front. Disagreement over which rebels to back is one of the reasons Ankara has refused the U.S. requests to use Turkish territory to train rebel forces and as a base from which to carry out attacks on ISIL. The United States’ principal allies simply do not agree on which rebel forces are sufficiently moderate to qualify for support.

  • Iraq: on the frontline with the Shia fighters taking the war to Isis | World news
    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/aug/24/iraq-frontline-shia-fighters-war-isis/print

    In Baghdad a senior Shia politician, whose own party has started arming and equipping a militia force of its own, said that he feared the Shia were becoming as radical as the enemy they were fighting. "We are in the process of creating Shia al-Qaida radical groups equal in their radicalisation to the Sunni Qaida.

    “By arming the community and creating all these regiments of militias, I am scared that my sect and community will burn. Our Shia project was building a modern, just state but now it’s all been taken by the radicals. Think of 20 years ahead – these are all schools graduating militias, creating a mutant that is killing people, that is amassing weapons. Where will they go when the fight is over here? They will take their wars and go to Saudi and Yemen. Just like the Sunni jihadis migrated, so will the Shia militias.”

  • #Bahrain opposition leader will face prosecutor
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/bahrain-opposition-leader-will-face-prosecutor

    The head of Bahrain’s largest #Shia opposition movement will face prosecutors Thursday after police in the #Sunni-ruled kingdom interrogated him over a meeting with a senior US diplomat. Cleric Ali Salman, who heads #Al-Wefaq, and his political assistant, former MP Khalil Marzooq, were summoned by police Wednesday to appear before the public prosecutor, the movement said. That came after police questioned them the same day about the “meeting with US Assistant Secretary of State” Tom Malinowski and the “political situation in Bahrain and the region,” said Al-Wefaq. read more

  • Bahrain Repression Continues Amid Sham Trials
    by Emile Nakhleh
    http://www.lobelog.com/bahrain-repression-continues-amid-sham-trials

    The lengthy prison sentences handed down to 50 Shia activists last week and the refusal of Bahraini courts to hear their allegations of torture once again confirm the regime’s continued repression of the opposition.

    Amnesty International in a statement this week decried the unfair trials and sentencing of these activists and the inability of the defence lawyers to present witnesses or to challenge the authorities’ politically motivated charges. Court decisions seem to be pre-ordained regardless of the facts.

    Many of those convicted were allegedly tortured in prison before trial as “terrorists”, an accusation which the Al Khalifa regime hurls at any Bahraini who criticises regime brutality.

    In a recent interview with Al Monitor, the Bahraini foreign minister defended his government’s “serious” commitment to the so-called national reconciliation dialogue and accused the opposition of undermining it. He said the dialogue is “there to stay,” but just this week the government suspended the dialogue until Oct. 30.

  • Lebanon Cabinet : Hezbollah and Suleiman Change the Equation
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/lebanon-cabinet-hezbollah-and-suleiman-change-equation

    To their surprise, March 14 discovered that Hezbollah was not at all prepared to sacrifice their Aounist ally. The Shia party is reported to have even asked for a veto share – one-third of the cabinet – for March 8 and the FPM. Otherwise, Hezbollah sources said, the minority can rule on its own, while they and their allies will become the opposition.

    Those close to Hezbollah say the party is far more at ease these days given the new developments taking place in Syria. To begin with, the party no longer feels the need to hide that some of its fighters are involved in Syria, even though it is under the guise of protecting Lebanese villages and Shia shrines.

    The party is also said to be quite comfortable about the trajectory of events in Syria, where the regime has managed to regain the initiative on the ground and has scored a series of gains across the country against opposition fighters.

    The developments next door mean that Hezbollah is not under any pressure to quickly form a new government, for time is increasingly on its side.

    Certes à classer au rayon « Supputations politico-policiennes », mais tu sais bien que j’ai faible pour ce genre de choses libano-libanaises…

  • Lebanon’s Future Movement: Turmoil in the Ranks | Al Akhbar English
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/lebanon%E2%80%99s-future-movement-turmoil-ranks

    There are also growing sectarian tensions in the party, which were further exposed in the course of the Syrian crisis, as a more militant Islamist discourse developed in some quarters, with some even criticizing the influence of “Qoreitem’s Shia” on Hariri.

    Shia circles in the party fear that they will be the scapegoats of Future’s shortcomings. It began with the dismissal of Jizini, who may be followed by another prominent Shia party leader, MP Okab Sakr. Sources close to Hariri are already saying that it may not be possible to nominate Sakr in the coming elections for “political and security considerations.”

    In addition to splits within the party in the Bekaa, the Future Movement is also losing its members to Salafi groups such as Ahmad al-Assir’s in Saida.

  • Al-Jamaa al-Islamiya, Amal agree to form joint cooperation commission
    http://www.nowlebanon.com/NewsArchiveDetails.aspx?ID=363058

    The Sunni Al-Jamaa al-Islamiya group held a meeting with members of the Shia Amal Movement on Friday.

    According to the statement issued by Al-Jamaa al-Islamiya, the two factions agreed to “form a committee for joint cooperation in the upcoming period.”

    The meeting was attended by the chief of Amal’s political bureau, Jamil Hayek, and his Al-Jamaa al-Islamiya counterpart Azam al-Ayoubi, in addition to members of both parties.