person:abdulrahman al-rashed

Notes sur l’Iran et l’apocalypse USA-2018
▻http://www.dedefensa.org/article/notes-sur-liran-et-lapocalypse-usa-2018

Notes sur l’Iran et l’apocalypse USA-2018

02 janvier 2018 – Nous n’avons pas eu beaucoup à attendre : le passage à l’an nouveau a transformé des protestations classiques en une crise qui peut devenir importante, grave, explosive, etc. Les évènements en Iran sont la première préoccupation nouvelle de 2018, la première situation crisique majeure, comme si le cours des évènements tenait à entretenir un rythme étourdissant dans le moteur de la dynamique de surpuissance de déstructuration/dissolution du Système. Depuis mercredi dernier, un mouvement de revendication se développe, dont l’origine est assez indéterminée mais les causes au départ économiques (selon les premiers slogans) tout à fait acceptables et raisonnables.

Aussitôt, l’appareil de subversion des USA, – neocons et tweets de Trump en tête, – s’est (...)

Conflicts Forum Weekly Comment: ISIS: Back to Pre-Islamic Arab structures
▻http://www.conflictsforum.org/2014/conflicts-forum-weekly-comment-isis-back-to-pre-islamic-arab-structu

The Saudi response (as outlined in an opinion-piece by a top Saudi establishment commentator, Abdulrahman Al-Rashed, who heads Al-Arabiya television) is that the ISIS threat needs to be understood properly – since there is a “genuine [Sunni] revolution against a sectarian repugnant rule” in both Syria and Iraq. ISIS tapped into this ‘Sunni anger’ to become “the star at the box office” for Sunnis all over the world … However, “were it not for Assad and Maliki, ISIS and the Al-Nusra Front would not have existed.” (This Saudi meme is the ‘narrative’ that has almost universally been taken up by the mainstream western media.)

Saudi Arabia is prepared, Abdulrahman suggests to confront ISIS, but only – and only if - “a political solution [is] imposed in Syria and Iraq” — a regime change that leads to wider Sunni mobilization. The sectarian policies of Assad and Maliki “triggered this chaos. Therefore, the solution lies in strong central governments in both Baghdad and Damascus with American, Western and regional support.”

But let us be clear: When Abdulrahman insists that Nouri al-Maliki must be ousted, he is not proposing that another Shi’i simply take his place – as would occur under the present political dispensation in which the Shi’i amount to 60 – 65% of the electorate. He is calling for the overthrow of the system – with a Sunni (or a Riyadh approved Iyad Alawi) ‘strongman’ placed in power (à la Sisi). Ditto for Syria. It is a call for the purging of the Middle East.