person:manuel barroso

  • Pantouflage, petits fours et salons « dorés » :

    Les membres de la Commission de Bruxelles : au service d’eux-mêmes et des mutinationales — Bernard GENSANE
    http://www.legrandsoir.info/les-membres-de-la-commission-de-bruxelles-au-service-d-eux-memes-et-de

    Une enquête de l’ONG Corporate Europe Observatory, dont la raison d’être est d’étudier les groupes de pression qui sévissent à Bruxelles, a établi une liste des anciens membres de la Commission présidée par Manuel Barroso ayant retrouvé de juteuses situations dans les entreprises multinationales.

    Et que trouve-t-on sur Wikipédia à propos de ladite commission (européenne de Bruxelles) ?

    Elle joue, en principe, un rôle central de garante envers « l’intérêt général » de l’UE, ce qui fonde son monopole de l’initiative législative. Au sein des systèmes politiques démocratiques, la Commission européenne possède cette originalité de représenter « l’intérêt général » tout en n’étant pas issue du Parlement européen, élu, lui, au suffrage universel. Toutefois les groupes d’intérêt, qui représentent des intérêts catégoriels publics ou privés, jouent un rôle important dans le processus de décision.

    Étonnant, non ?

  • A Bad Gas Deal For Ukraine As Europe Looks After Its Own Interests
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/paulroderickgregory/2014/10/31/a-bad-gas-deal-for-ukraine-as-europe-looks-after-its-own-interests

    The BBC headline tells it all: Russia-Ukraine gas deal secures EU winter supply (via Ukraine). European officials also confirmed the message of the headline. Commission President Manuel Barroso triumphantly declared: “There is now no reason for people in Europe to stay cold this winter,” and European Union energy chief, Guenther Oettinger, announced he was confident that Ukraine would be able to afford to pay for the gas it needed (Says who?). Where are Ukraine’s expressions of gratitude and relief? They are lacking for good reason.

    It turns out the month-long negotiations over Ukraine’s gas dispute with Russia were really about securing Europe’s Russian gas. Ukraine was only a side issue. Russia’s incessant propaganda that Europe itself was threatened by Ukraine’s gas cutoff dominated the discussion. Europe pushed Ukraine into a bad deal to protect itself.

    What did Ukraine get out of the deal? It received the go-ahead to transfer some one third of the financial assistance it is receiving from the IMF and European Union to pay for the Russian gas, diverting scarce funds from its desperate defense, infrastructure, and reform needs. Ukraine gets to pay Russia one of the highest gas prices in Europe ($378 versus the $304 European average), and there appears to be no agreement as to how much of this gas goes to the gas-guzzling heavy industry of the Donbass, occupied by pro-Russian rebels. Kiev, by the way, has been virtually cut off from Donbass coal and has to buy elsewhere.

    On rappelle que l’accord UE-Uk-Ru s’est fait aux conditions russes (prix et paiement d’avance), l’Ukraine peut emprunter pour payer, avec la garantie de l’UE — ce qui n’est quand même pas tout à fait rien…

    L’Europe aura du gaz cet hiver, finalement c’est ça qui compte.

  • GUNS, DEBT AND CORRUPTION
    http://www.tni.org/sites/www.tni.org/files/download/eu_milspending_crisis.pdf

    The debts caused by arms sales were often a result of corrupt deals between government officials but are being paid for by ordinary people facing savage cuts in social services.

    Investigations of an arms deal signed by Portugal in 2004 to buy two submarines for one billion euros, agreed by then-prime minister Manuel Barroso (now President of the EU Commission) have identified more than a dozen suspicious brokerage and consulting agreements that cost Portugal at least €34 million. Up to eight arms deals signed by the Greek government since the late 1990s are being investigated by judicial authorities for possible illegal bribes and kickbacks to state officials and politicians.

    According to the Economist, German businesses were reckoned in 1999 to pay “more than $3 billion a year all told to win contracts abroad”. In the international arms trade, “probably the world’s dirtiest legitimate business, one estimate reckons that roughly $2.5 billion a year is paid in bribes, nearly a tenth of turnover”.

    In 2011, German prosecutors succeeded in convicting two former managers of Ferrostaal for paying €62 million in bribes to key Greek and Portuguese officials in connection with the submarine deals.142 At the time Ferrostaal explicitly denied ever having paid bribes for the deals.143 The two former Ferrostaal managers were given quite lenient sentences, while Ferrostaal itself was fined €140 million for ‘obtaining an economic advantage’ through its two employees.

    Up to eight arms deals signed by the Greek government since
    the late 1990s are being investigated by judicial authorities
    for possible illegal bribes and kickbacks to state officials and
    politicians, according to the Greek newspaper Kathimerini.

    Among these is the purchase of US-made Patriot missiles and
    the German submarine deal. “Investigators are probing bank
    accounts and offshore companies in a bid to trace millions of
    euros received by senior state officials as sweeteners for the
    arms deals. Kathimerini understands that two cases involve
    possible offenses committed by two defense ministers who
    served before 2006.” Suspicious payments were reportedly
    made via Austria, the Caribbean, Liberia and Cyprus.

    Former defence minister Akis Tsochatzopoulos, his wife and
    17 others are to stand trial, from April 2013, for kickbacks
    from arms purchases. Tsochatzopoulos, a founding member
    of the PASOK socialist party, is alleged to have pocketed €20
    million in kickbacks between 1998 and 2001, including €8 million from Ferrostaal in the submarine deal.

    The submarine corruption scandals are not limited to Greece
    and Portugal. Questionable payments were also involved
    in the sale of German submarines to South Korea....

    Another case under scrutiny has been the €1.7 billion sale of
    170 Leopard tanks to Greece by Kassel-based KMW, which
    denied having paid bribes for the deal.161 The refusal of cooperation from the Virgin Islands, a key link in the money trail,
    has stymied this investigation however.

    Corruption in Greece is frequently singled out as a cause
    for waste but at the same time companies like Ferrostaal
    and Siemens are pioneers in the practice. A big part of our
    defence spending is bound up with bribes, black money
    that funds the [mainstream] political class in a nation
    where governments have got away with it by long playing
    on peoples’ fears.”16