person:saad al-hariri

  • Lebanon on the Brink - رأي اليوم
    By Abdel Bari Atwan - December 24, 2018

    https://www.raialyoum.com/index.php/lebanon-on-the-brink

    (...) The public quarrel over the representation of the bloc of Sunni MPs allied to Hezbollah blew up after prime minister-designate Saad al-Hariri refused to appoint any of its six members to the government. A compromise was agreed under which each of these MPs would nominate another figure and President Michel Aoun would select one of these. But this solution unravelled in turn when the Lebanese president chose Jawad Adra as the prospective minister. The other MPs protested that he did not represent them, and accused Aoun’s Free Patriotic Movement (FPM) of effectively trying to enlarge its own bloc — thereby giving itself 11 out of 30 cabinet posts and effective veto power over government decisions. So things went back to square one.
    The demands for lower taxes and food prices, improved public services and free health-care made by the demonstrators who took to the streets of Beirut largely echo those of the ‘yellow vests’ in France who have shaken up French politics in recent weeks.
    Lebanon’s public debt has reached nearly $100 billion and the World Bank estimates that a third of the country’s inhabitants live below the poverty line. These certainly do not include the members of the political elite who have been fighting over cabinet seats and important state posts.
    Hariri has now decided to go on vacation until the new year, while declaring that he will remain silent about the country’s growing crisis, on the grounds that “sometimes silence is necessary for others to listen.” But we do not think he will find anyone to listen to him. The choice of Hariri to form a government, in this difficult juncture in the history of Lebanon and the region, is one of the main impediments to the country recovering and overcoming its mounting problems.
    Lebanon could be on the brink of an explosion with popular frustration at the status quo reaching unprecedented levels. And if such an explosion were to occur, it would be extremely difficult to control.

    #Liban #MichelAoun #Hezbollah

  • Israeli cyber firm negotiated advanced attack capabilities sale with Saudis, Haaretz reveals

    Just months before crown prince launched a purge against his opponents, NSO offered Saudi intelligence officials a system to hack into cellular phones ■ NSO: We abide the law, our products are used to combat crime and terrorism

    https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-israeli-company-negotiated-to-sell-advanced-cybertech-to-the-saudi

    The Israeli company NSO Group Technologies offered Saudi Arabia a system that hacks cellphones, a few months before Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman began his purge of regime opponents, according to a complaint to the Israel Police now under investigation.
    But NSO, whose development headquarters is in Herzliya, says that it has acted according to the law and its products are used in the fight against crime and terror.
    To really understand Israel and the Middle East - subscribe to Haaretz
    Either way, a Haaretz investigation based on testimony and photos, as well as travel and legal documents, reveals the Saudis’ behind-the-scenes attempts to buy Israeli technology.
    In June 2017, a diverse group gathered in a hotel room in Vienna, a city between East and West that for decades has been a center for espionage, defense-procurement contacts and unofficial diplomatic meetings.
    Keep updated: Sign up to our newsletter
    Email* Sign up

    Arriving at the hotel were Abdullah al-Malihi, a close associate of Prince Turki al-Faisal – a former head of Saudi Arabia’s intelligence services – and another senior Saudi official, Nasser al-Qahtani, who presented himself as the deputy of the current intelligence chief. Their interlocutors were two Israeli businessmen, representatives of NSO, who presented to the Saudis highly advanced technology.

    >> Israel’s cyber-spy industry helps world dictators hunt dissidents and gays | Revealed
    In 2017, NSO was avidly promoting its new technology, its Pegasus 3 software, an espionage tool so sophisticated that it does not depend on the victim clicking on a link before the phone is breached.
    During the June 2017 meeting, NSO officials showed a PowerPoint presentation of the system’s capabilities. To demonstrate it, they asked Qahtani to go to a nearby mall, buy an iPhone and give them its number. During that meeting they showed how this was enough to hack into the new phone and record and photograph the participants in the meeting.
    The meeting in Vienna wasn’t the first one between the two sides. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has recently expressed pride in the tightening ties with Gulf states, with Israel’s strength its technology. The message is clear: Israel is willing to sell these countries security-related technologies, and they forge closer ties with Israel in the strategic battle against Iran.
    >> $6 billion of Iranian money: Why Israeli firm Black Cube really went after Obama’s team
    According to the complaint, the affair began with a phone call received by a man identified as a European businessman with connections in the Gulf states. On the line was W., an Israeli dealing in defense-related technologies and who operates through Cyprus-based companies. (Many defense-related companies do business in Cyprus because of its favorable tax laws.) W. asked his European interlocutor to help him do business in the Gulf.

    FILE Photo: Two of the founders of NSO, Shalev Julio and Omri Lavi.
    Among the European businessman’s acquaintances were the two senior Saudi officials, Malihi and Qahtani.
    On February 1, 2017, W. and the businessman met for the first time. The main topic was the marketing of cyberattack software. Unlike ordinary weapons systems, the price depends only on a customer’s eagerness to buy the system.
    The following month, the European businessman traveled to a weapons exhibition in the United Arab Emirates, where a friend introduced him to Malihi, the Saudi businessman.
    In April 2017, a meeting was arranged in Vienna between Malihi, Qahtani and representatives of Israeli companies. Two more meetings subsequently took place with officials of Israeli companies in which other Israelis were present. These meetings took place at the Four Seasons Hotel in Limassol, Cyprus, where Israeli cybercompanies often meet with foreign clients.
    >> Snowden: Israeli firm’s spyware was used to track Khashoggi
    The meetings were attended by W. and his son. They were apparently friendly: In photographs documenting one of them, W. and Qahtani are shown after a hunting trip, with the Saudi aiming a rifle at a dead animal.
    In the Vienna meeting of April 2017, the Saudis presented a list of 23 systems they sought to acquire. Their main interest was cybersystems. For a few dozens of millions of dollars, they would be able to hack into the phones of regime opponents in Saudi Arabia and around the world and collect classified information about them.
    According to the European businessman, the Saudis, already at the first meeting, passed along to the representatives of one of the companies details of a Twitter account of a person who had tweeted against the regime. They wanted to know who was behind the account, but the Israeli company refused to say.

    Offices of Israeli NSO Group company in Herzliya, Israel, Aug. 25, 2016Daniella Cheslow/AP
    In the June 2017 meeting, the Saudis expressed interest in NSO’s technology.
    According to the European businessman, in July 2017 another meeting was held between the parties, the first at W.’s home in Cyprus. W. proposed selling Pegasus 3 software to the Saudis for $208 million.
    Malihi subsequently contacted W. and invited him to Riyadh to present the software to members of the royal family. The department that oversees defense exports in Israel’s Defense Ministry and the ministry’s department for defense assistance, responsible for encouraging exports, refused to approve W.’s trip.
    Using the initials for the defense assistance department, W. reportedly said “screw the D.A.” and chartered a small plane, taking with him NSO’s founder, Shalev Hulio, to the meetings in the Gulf. According to the European businessman, the pair were there for three days, beginning on July 18, 2017.
    At these meetings, the European businessman said, an agreement was made to sell the Pegasus 3 to the Saudis for $55 million.
    According to the European businessman, the details of the deal became known to him only through his contacts in the defense assistance department. He said he had agreed orally with W. that his commission in the deal would be 5 percent – $2.75 million.
    But W. and his son stopped answering the European businessman’s phone calls. Later, the businessman told the police, he received an email from W.’s lawyer that contained a fake contract in which the company would agree to pay only his expenses and to consider whether to pay him a bonus if the deal went through.
    The European businessman, assisted by an Israeli lawyer, filed a complaint in April 2018. He was questioned by the police’s national fraud squad and was told that the affair had been transferred to another unit specializing in such matters. Since then he has been contacted by the income tax authorities, who are apparently checking whether there has been any unreported income from the deal.
    The European businessman’s claims seem to be substantiated by correspondence Haaretz has obtained between Cem Koksal, a Turkish businessman living in the UAE, and W.’s lawyers in Israel. The European businessman said in his complaint that Koksal was involved in mediating the deal.
    In a letter sent by Koksal’s lawyer in February of this year, he demanded his portion from W. In a response letter, sent in early March, W.’s attorney denied the existence of the deal. The deal had not been signed, the letter claimed, due to Koksal’s negligence, therefore he was due no commission or compensation of any kind.
    These issues have a wider context. From the claims by the European businessman and Koksal’s letter, it emerges that the deal was signed in the summer of 2017, a few months before Crown Prince Mohammed began his purge of regime opponents. During that purge, the Saudi regime arrested and tortured members of the royal family and Saudi businessmen accused of corruption. The Saudis also held Lebanese Prime Minister Saad al-Hariri for a few days in a Riyadh hotel.
    In the following months the Saudis continued their hunt for regime opponents living abroad, which raised international attention only when the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in the Saudi Consulate in Istanbul came to light in October.
    It has recently been claimed that NSO helped the Saudi regime surveil its opponents. According to an article in Forbes magazine and reports from the Canadian cyber-related think tank Citizen Lab, among the surveillance targets were the satirist Ghanem Almasrir and human rights activist Yahya Asiri, who live in London, and Omar Abdulaziz, who lives in exile in Canada.
    These three men were in contact with Khashoggi. Last month, Edward Snowden, who uncovered the classified surveillance program of the U.S. National Security Agency, claimed that Pegasus had been used by the Saudi authorities to surveil Khashoggi.
    “They are the worst of the worst,” Snowden said of NSO, whose people he accused of aiding and abetting human rights violations.
    NSO’s founders and chief executives are Omri Lavie and Shalev Hulio. The company is registered in Cyprus but its development headquarters is in Herzliya. In 2014 the company was sold to private equity firm Francisco Partners based on a valuation of $250 million.
    Francisco Partners did not respond to Haaretz’s request for comment.
    In May, Verint Systems offered to buy NSO for $1 billion, but the offer was rejected. The company is awash in cash. Earlier this month all its employees went on vacation in Phuket, Thailand. Netta Barzilai, Lior Suchard, the Ma Kashur Trio and the band Infected Mushroom were also flown there to entertain them.
    The Pegasus system developed by NSO was a “one-click system,” meaning that the victim had to press on a link sent to him through phishing. The new system no longer requires this. Only the number of the SIM card is needed to hack into the phone. It’s unknown how Pegasus does this.
    Technology sources believe that the technology either exploits breaches in the cellphone’s modem, the part that receives messages from the antenna, or security breaches in the apps installed on a phone. As soon as a phone is hacked, the speaker and camera can be used for recording conversations. Even encoded apps such as WhatsApp can be monitored.
    NSO’s operations are extremely profitable.
    The company, which conceals its client list, has been linked to countries that violate human rights. NSO says its products are used in the fight against crime and terror, but in certain countries the authorities identify anti-regime activists and journalists as terrorists and subject them to surveillance.
    In 2012, NSO sold an earlier version of Pegasus to Mexico to help it combat the drug cartel in that country. According to the company, all its contracts include a clause specifically permitting the use of its software only to “investigate and prevent crime or acts of terror.” But The New York Times reported in 2016 that the Mexican authorities also surveilled journalists and lawyers.
    Following that report, Mexican victims of the surveillance filed a lawsuit in Israel against NSO last September. This year, The New York Times reported that the software had been sold to the UAE, where it helped the authorities track leaders of neighboring countries as well as a London newspaper editor.
    In response to these reports, NSO said it “operated and operates solely in compliance with defense export laws and under the guidelines and close oversight of all elements of the defense establishment, including all matters relating to export policies and licenses.
    “The information presented by Haaretz about the company and its products and their use is wrong, based on partial rumors and gossip. The presentation distorts reality.
    “The company has an independent, external ethics committee such as no other company like it has. It includes experts in legal affairs and international relations. The committee examines every deal so that the use of the system will take place only according to permitted objectives of investigating and preventing terror and crime.
    “The company’s products assist law enforcement agencies in protecting people around the world from terror attacks, drug cartels, child kidnappers for ransom, pedophiles, and other criminals and terrorists.
    “In contrast to newspaper reports, the company does not sell its products or allow their use in many countries. Moreover, the company greatly limits the extent to which its customers use its products and is not involved in the operation of the systems by customers.”
    A statement on W.’s behalf said: “This is a false and completely baseless complaint, leverage for an act of extortion by the complainants, knowing that there is no basis for their claims and that if they would turn to the relevant courts they would be immediately rejected.”

  • Israel, Lebanon clash over offshore energy, raising tensions
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-natgas-lebanon-israel/israeli-minister-says-lebanese-claim-on-gas-field-provocative-idUSKBN1FK1J0

    Depuis le temps que cette affaire traîne…


    (carte avec la position libanaise, la revendication israélienne est en pointillés - ce qui n’est pas si fréquent…)

    Israel described as “very provocative” on Wednesday a Lebanese offshore oil and gas exploration tender in disputed territory on the countries’ maritime border, and said it was a mistake for international firms to participate.

    Lebanese Prime Minister Saad al-Hariri, whose country considers Israel an enemy state, said the comments were one of several “threatening messages” from Israel in recent days.

    Lebanese political and military movement Hezbollah vowed to defend the country’s “oil and gas rights” against Israeli threats.

    Lebanon is on the Levant Basin in the eastern Mediterranean where a number of big sub-sea gas fields have been discovered since 2009, including the Leviathan and Tamar fields located in Israeli waters near the disputed marine border with Lebanon.

    Israeli Defence Minister Avigdor Lieberman said: “When they issue a tender on a gas field, including Block 9, which by any standard is ours ... this is very, very challenging and provocative conduct here.

    Respectable firms” bidding on the tender “are, to my mind, making a grave error - because this is contrary to all of the rules and all protocol in cases like this,” he told an international security conference hosted by Tel Aviv University’s INSS think-tank.

    Lebanon in December approved a bid by a consortium of France’s Total, Italy’s Eni and Russia’s Novatek for two of the five blocks put up for tender in the country’s much-delayed first oil and gas offshore licensing round.

    One of the awarded blocks, Block 9, borders Israeli waters. Lebanon has an unresolved maritime border dispute with Israel over a triangular area of sea of around 860 sq km (330 square miles) that extends along the edge of three of the blocks.

    Israel has not issued its own tenders for Block 9, with its officials saying they were focused on blocks that would not be disputed.

    Lieberman’s words about Block 9 are a threat to Lebanon and its right to sovereignty over its territorial waters,” Lebanese President Michel Aoun said on his official Twitter account.

    Hariri said the country would take up the comments with the “relevant international bodies to affirm its right to act in its territorial waters”. In a statement from his press office, the premier said Lieberman’s words were “blatant provocation”.

    Lebanese Foreign Minister Gebran Bassil said he had sent a letter to the United Nations two weeks ago affirming Lebanon’s right to defend itself and its economic interests.

    Hezbollah described the comments as “a new aggression” and said it would “decisively confront any assault on our oil and gas rights.”

  • Hariri s’en revient-au-pays...
    http://www.dedefensa.org/article/hariri-sen-revient-au-pays

    Hariri s’en revient-au-pays...

    Le premier ministre libanais est rentré dans son pays après une “libération“ d’Arabie Saoudite et un sas de décompression d’un séjour de quelques jours à Paris, pour bien marquer l’intervention du président français Macron dans le processus. Officiellement démissionnaire sous les auspices de MbS, le tout-nouveau jeune homme fort d’Arabie, le Premier ministre libanais rentré à Beyrouth a annoncé qu’il suspendait sa “démission”... Ouf de soulagement, qui renforce plutôt qu’il ne disperse la perception d’une tragédie-bouffe, – d’ailleurs principalement due à certains aspects des insurrections, “coups” et révolution de palais parmi les mille-et-un princes de Ryad.

    Nous ne nous risquerons pas une seconde à échaffauder notre propre analyse d’une situation labyrinthique à partir de (...)

    • L’alliance du wahhabisme et du sionisme
      Abdel Bari Atwan – 19 novembre 2017 – Raï al-Yaoum – Traduction : Chronique de Palestine – Lotfallah
      http://chroniquepalestine.com/alliance-wahhabisme-sionisme

      Les dirigeants d’Israël ne vont pas faire la guerre au nom de Riyad mais sont au contraire heureux de l’attirer dans une série de conflits autodestructeurs.

      L’Arabie saoudite continue de provoquer des surprises et d’attiser les flammes dans les conflits de la région, comme si les guerres en Syrie, au Yémen, en Libye et (partiellement) en Irak ne suffisaient pas. Après avoir retenu prisonnier le Premier ministre libanais Saad al-Hariri et l’avoir forcé à démissionner, elle a commencé à montrer plus ouvertement que jamais son désir d’une alliance avec Israël.

      Le 16 novembre, le journal Internet saoudien Elaph a publié une interview du chef d’état-major israélien, Gadi Eizenkot, dans laquelle celui-ci affirmait la volonté du gouvernement israélien d’échanger des renseignements avec l’Arabie saoudite afin de confronter l’Iran. Ses remarques ont été soigneusement préparées et le moment de leur publication était très significatif. Il a précisé qu’une alliance militaire saoudo-israélienne est en train d’être établie. Les pays n’échangent généralement pas de renseignements militaires à moins qu’ils ne soient confrontés à un ennemi commun en période de conflit.

      Affronter l’Iran est avant tout dans l’intérêt d’Israël. L’Iran est en effet le seul pays de la région capable de représenter une menace existentielle pour l’État d’occupation et il a réussi à développer une formidable capacité de missiles dont il a fourni des milliers d’exemplaires à ses proches alliés en Syrie, au Liban, en Irak et au Yémen.

  • Exclusive : How Saudi Arabia turned on Lebanon’s Hariri
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-lebanon-politics-hariri-exclusive/exclusive-how-saudi-arabia-turned-on-lebanons-hariri-idUSKBN1DB0QL

    From the moment Saad al-Hariri’s plane touched down in Saudi Arabia on Friday Nov. 3, he was in for a surprise.

    There was no line-up of Saudi princes or ministry officials, as would typically greet a prime minister on an official visit to King Salman, senior sources close to Hariri and top Lebanese political and security officials said. His phone was confiscated, and the next day he was forced to resign as prime minister in a statement broadcast by a Saudi-owned TV channel.

    […]

    Sources close to Hariri said the Saudis, while keeping Hariri under house arrest, were trying to orchestrate a change of leadership in Hariri’s Future Movement by installing his elder brother Bahaa, who was overlooked for the top job when their father was killed. The two have been at odds for years.

  • Tractations franco-saoudiennes autour du sort de Saad Hariri
    Par Georges Malbrunot Publié le 10/11/2017
    http://www.lefigaro.fr/international/2017/11/10/01003-20171110ARTFIG00177-tractations-franco-saoudiennes-autour-du-sort-de-

    Riyad souhaiterait remplacer le premier ministre libanais par un de ses frères. Le conseiller Moyen-Orient d’Emmanuel Macron a été dépêché à Beyrouth.

    L’avenir du premier ministre libanais démissionnaire, Saad Hariri, est au centre de toutes les tractations. « À notre connaissance, il est libre de ses mouvements », a réagi vendredi matin sur Europe 1 Jean-Yves Le Drian, le ministre des Affaires étrangères, quelques heures après la visite surprise d’Emmanuel Macron à Riyad, où il a rencontré le nouvel homme fort de l’Arabie, le prince héritier Mohammed Ben Salman (MBS).

    De Riyad, le conseiller Moyen-Orient du chef de l’État, Aurélien Le Chevalier, a été dépêché à Beyrouth pour évoquer l’avenir du camp Hariri. Sollicité, l’Élysée a confirmé l’information, soulignant que cette visite était prévue de longue date.

    Quelques heures avant l’arrivée du chef de l’État à Riyad, l’ambassadeur de France en Arabie, François Gouyette, avait rencontré Saad Hariri. Selon une source française, « le leader libanais était entouré d’officiels saoudiens pour cet entretien qui n’aurait pas duré très longtemps ». La rencontre n’a pas eu lieu à l’Hôtel Ritz Carlton, où sont retenus de nombreux princes et dignitaires saoudiens accusés de corruption par MBS.
    (...)
    Après Saad, Baha Hariri

    Désormais, Riyad chercherait à remplacer Saad Hariri par un de ses frères. « Une proposition a été faite à la famille Hariri de désigner Baha, un frère de Saad, pour reprendre le flambeau politique », confie une source française à Beyrouth. Nazek, la veuve de Rafic Hariri, l’ancien premier ministre assassiné en 2005, Bahyia Hariri, la sœur de ce dernier, et Ahmad, un fils de Bahyia qui dirige le Parti libanais Al-Moustaqbal, auraient été conviés à Riyad pour avaliser cette redistribution des cartes. Mais le clan l’aurait refusée.

    Visiblement agacé, Nouad Mashnouk, ministre de l’Intérieur et proche de l’ancien premier ministre Rafic Hariri, a déclaré que le Liban n’était pas « une monnaie d’échange, ni un terrain à vendre ».(...)

    #ArabieSaoudite #Liban

    • Point de presse du 10 novembre 2017
      http://basedoc.diplomatie.gouv.fr/vues/Kiosque/FranceDiplomatie/kiosque.php?type=ppfr#Chapitre7

      7. Arabie Saoudite

      Q - Avez-vous eu des assurances des autorités saoudiennes pour les investisseurs français qui ont des liens commerciaux avec les personnalités arrêtées cette semaine au royaume et est-ce qu’il y a eu une demande de l’Arabie Saoudite de geler les avoirs en France de personnalités saoudiennes ?

      R - La visite du président de la République à Riyad le 9 novembre a confirmé l’intensité des échanges bilatéraux entre nos pays.

      Les entreprises et les investisseurs français exerçant leur activité dans ce pays le font dans ce cadre et dans le respect de la loi saoudienne.

      Retour sommaire

      8. Liban

      Q - Le ministre déclare ce matin qu’« il importe que lui-même (Saad al-Hariri) fasse ses choix » Avez-vous des indications que Hariri n’est pas en capacité de faire ses propres choix ?

      Q - Avez-vous pu rendre visite à M. Saad Hariri et avez-vous constaté la liberté de mouvement dont Jean-Yves Le Drian a parlé ce matin ?

      R - Notre ambassadeur en Arabie Saoudite a rendu visite à M. Saad Hariri, à son domicile, au retour du voyage qu’il a effectué aux Emirats Arabes Unis, auquel le Ministre a fait référence ce matin.

      Comme le ministre l’a dit, nous souhaitons que M. Saad Hariri dispose de toute sa liberté de mouvement et soit pleinement en mesure de jouer le rôle essentiel qui est le sien au Liban.

  • Saudi Arabia says Lebanon has declared war on it
    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-lebanon-politics-saudi/saudi-arabia-says-lebanon-has-declared-war-on-it-idUSKBN1D62NQ

    Saudi Gulf affairs minister Thamer al-Sabhan told Al-Arabiya TV that Saad al-Hariri, who announced his resignation as Lebanon’s prime minister on Saturday, had been told that acts of “aggression” by Hezbollah “were considered acts of a declaration of war against Saudi Arabia by Lebanon and by the Lebanese Party of the Devil”.

    • C dans l’hier hier avait invite une majorite de femmes. Resultat ? Une affection sans borne pour le jeune heritier ’tres populaire aupres des jeunes saoudien.nes’ et une surenchaire sur l’amitie entre les peuples qui se mesure au taux de ventes d’armes. Affligeant...

  • A New Direction for Lebanon’s Muslim Brothers - Syria in Crisis - Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
    http://carnegieendowment.org/syriaincrisis/?fa=62740
    A New Direction for Lebanon’s Muslim Brothers
    Posted by: RAPHAËL LEFÈVRE
    THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 2016
    +
    PRINT PAGE
    The Muslim Brotherhood has never played as large a role in the political life of Lebanon as it has in other Arab countries such as Egypt and Syria, but the January 2016 election of Azzam Ayyoubi as Secretary General of the Brotherhood’s Lebanon branch, the Jamaa al-Islamiya, has provoked speculation that the move could refresh the group’s image and bolster its influence in the local Sunni Muslim community. A 48-year-old Tripoli school inspector and head of the group’s political bureau until recently, Ayyoubi is viewed as a pragmatic yet principled Islamist leader who can shore up the group’s popularity.

    Created in 1964 by Islamic activists from Tripoli, the Jamaa al-Islamiya has since then spread, to varying degrees, to all of Lebanon’s regions. It spearheads a vast network of medical facilities and schools distributed across the country. The group is also active in the Sunni religious sphere. Its influence in mosques and institutions such as Dar al-Fatwa have turned it into the most powerful Sunni Islamist actor.

    Yet, for all its successes, the Jamaa al-Islamiya remains on the fringes of Lebanese politics. The group has only one member in parliament, a stark contrast to the 26 MPs boasted by the Future Movement, the party of former prime minister Saad al-Hariri that is its main Sunni rival. It is a junior partner in the March 14 coalition, a cross-sectarian gathering of parties opposed to the Syrian regime. Even in Tripoli, a traditional bastion of support for the group, it has struggled to retain its political relevance.

    While there are many reasons for this state of affairs, a key element has been the lack of a bold leadership at its helm willing to clarify the group’s political positions on a range of issues, a symptom of the Islamist old guard’s grasp on the reins of leadership. Before aiming to expand the reach of his organization, Azzam Ayyoubi will thus face the uphill task of reforming the Jamaa al-Islamiya and injecting new blood into its veins.

    OVERCOMING INTERNAL TENSIONS

    In itself, the election of Azzam Ayyoubi is a manifestation of the intense degree of frustration felt by the younger generation of activists towards an old guard that has held power since the 1960s. Indeed, the main line of fracture which emerged during the contest between candidates vying for the top post was neither ideological nor regional, but generational. It pitted Azzam Ayyoubi, who had the support of a majority of the youth, against Ghassan Hoblos, also a Tripolitan but one from the generation of the group’s founding fathers. Ayyoubi’s electoral victory was preceded by elections to the Majlis al-Shura, the group’s main internal decision making body, which yielded a major rise in young members in the Majlis.

    Generational tensions are not merely a product of younger members’ thirst for positions and responsibilities but also a result of clashing visions over the identity of the Jamaa al-Islamiya. While successive leaders such as Fathi Yakan, Faysal Mawlawi, and Ibrahim al-Masri have all prioritized organizational survival through tight hierarchy and discreet political manoeuvring, the youth have by contrast encouraged greater openness and more assertive political stances. Reportedly, members in their thirties and forties have been the driving force behind the entry of six women into the group’s Majlis al-Shura who will now, for the first time, have voting rights equal to the men. They have also pushed for greater coordination with other Sunni Islamist forces and with non-Muslims.

  • Lebanon’s Geagea declares support for rival Aoun as president
    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-lebanon-geagea-idUSKCN0UW1X6

    Lebanese Christian politician Samir Geagea backed his rival Michel Aoun for the presidency on Monday, in an apparent break with his Saudi-backed allies that aligns him with a civil war era enemy supported by Hezbollah.

    […]

    Geagea made the announcement in a televised news conference sitting alongside Aoun. He also called on his allies in the March 14 alliance, led by the Saudi-backed politician Saad al-Hariri, to support Aoun’s candidacy.

    Réaction immédiate « des gens » : quoi ? Qu’est-ce qu’ils ont fait comme deal, ces deux-là ?

  • D’accord, mais qu’en pense Dieu ?

    Saudi backs deal that would make Assad ally Lebanon’s president
    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-lebanon-presidency-idUSKBN0TM1AG20151203

    Saudi Arabia lent its backing on Thursday to a power-sharing plan that would make a family friend of Syria’s Bashar al-Assad president of Lebanon, saying it hoped it would happen within weeks.

    The proposal tabled by Sunni politician Saad al-Hariri would see him return to Lebanon as prime minister, and make Maronite Christian politician Suleiman Franjieh president. Hariri is backed by Saudi Arabia.

    Dieu parlant par la bouche de l’ambassadeur séoudien :

    “God willing we will see ... this vacuum filled thanks to good efforts in Lebanon” around the end of this year, said Ali Awad Asiri, the Saudi ambassador to Lebanon.

    Dieu parlant par la bouche du Patriarche maronite :

    “Thank God there is an initiative, and one which has value. The initiative is serious, and so I say that the door is open to all sides that are able to talk responsibly and reach the most fitting solution,” he said, shortly before meeting Franjieh.

    Dieu parlant par la bouche de Saad Hariri :

    Asked whether the Franjieh proposal was still valid, Hariri said: “There are discussions under way and the climate is positive, God willing, and the coming days will show Lebanon to be in very good shape.”

    Je pense que là c’est bon, Frangié a le « God Seal of Approval »…

    • Évoqué aussi dans la page « Buying Silence » :
      https://wikileaks.org/saudi-cables/buying-silence

      The cables reveal that the government employs a different approach for its own domestic media. There, a wave of the Royal hand is all that is required to adjust the output of state-controlled media. A complaint from former Lebanese Prime Minister and Saudi citizen Saad Hariri concerning articles critical of him in the Saudi-owned Al-Hayat and Asharq Al-Awsat newspapers prompted a directive to “stop these type of articles” from the Foreign Ministry.

  • al-Araby al-Jadeed English - Nasrallah, Hariri, and their roles in the regional crisis

    http://www.alaraby.co.uk/english/politics/2015/4/19/nasrallah-hariri-and-their-roles-in-the-regional-crisis

    By: Thaer Ghandour
    Date of publication: 19 April, 2015
    Tags
    Lebanon, Lebanese politics, regional politics
    Analysis: Though they are on opposite sides of the regional crisis, Lebanon’s Saad al-Hariri and Hassan Nasrallah are keen to avoid an escalation of political tension in Lebanon.
    A bizarre calm has descended on the Lebanese domestic scene.

    Although the divide among the Lebanese has worsened, the decision to spare the country an explosion is still valid, with many indications showing it may not last long.

    Meanwhile, two political leaders in Lebanon continue to exchange verbal blows on a regular basis. Ever since the “Decisive Storm” Operation kicked off, Future Movement leader Saad al-Hariri seemed like a key player in the Saudi-led alliance, as he was the first Arab politician to openly back up the operation in the media. In a 30-minute telephone conversation with al-Arabiya on 30 March, Hariri voiced his support for the operation, three hours after the airstrikes began.

    On the opposite front stands Hezbollah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah who spearheaded the opposite camp. On the second day of the operation, Nasrallah devoted a speech to respond to the alliance and for an hour, Hezbollah’s chief defended Iran and blasted Saudi Arabia for spearheading a coalition to launch a war on Yemen. Once again, during a live interview with the Syrian al-Ikhbariya TV, Nasrallah lashed out at Riyadh and he is expected to speak tomorrow in a ceremony organised by Hezbollah in support of the Houthis.

  • Former PM Hariri says will return to Lebanon for November elections
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/node/18305

    Former Lebanese Prime Minister Saad al-Hariri said on Monday he would return to Lebanon ahead of parliamentary elections later this year and was ready to work with his rivals for the good of the country. Hariri, who has been living in exile between France and Saudi Arabia since 2011 has been attending the Special Tribunal trial in the Netherlands regarding his father’s killing. Lebanon, still struggling to recover from its 1975-1990 civil war, has been without a fully functioning government since Prime Minister Najib Mikati resigned last March. read more

    #Lebanon_elections #Saad_Hariri #STL #Top_News

  • Stop the press!

    FLASH: New TV has its own Audio-LEAKS: EXPLOSIVE
    http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2011/01/flash-new-tv-has-its-own-audio-leaks.html

    New TV in Beirut just aired an audio tape with mini-Hariri and his chief of intelligence, Wisam Hasan, and German Hariri investigator, Gerhard Lehmann, and... the FAMOUS FALSE WITNESS, MUHAMMAD ZUHAYR AS-SIDDIQ (the most famous of the false witness who has woven so many fabrications about who was responsible for the Hariri investigation and who has been aided by French intelligence and Dubai intelligence). The significance of the audio tape can’t be overstated: this will officially put the last nail in the coffin of the Hariri tribunal. Hariri has officially denied any knowledge of the “false witnesses” and in this meeting he seems to be receiving orders from Siddiq himself. Now we know why the Hariri camp has been fiercely opposing the demand by the opposition to refer the “false witness” matter to the Justice Council in Lebanon. Of course, the testimony of Saddiq was the only reason why the “four generals” were incarcerated. Now you see why I never bothered to take the Hariri tribunal seriously. It was a joke before it was formed by an Israeli/US decision. This is the biggest gift to Hizbullah for the new year. Expect a press conference by Nasrallah this week.

    #Liban #TSL

    • قناة الجديد : الموقع الرسمي - حقيقة "ليكس" الجديد: لقاء الحريري، الحسن، ليمان، ومحمد زهير الصديق
      http://www.aljadeed.tv/wsg/newsdetails.aspx?ln=4918

      قناة الجديد تكشف في تقرير خاص جلسة حوار بين رئيس الحكومة المستقيلة سعد الحريري ورئيس جهاز شعبة المعلومات وسام الحسن ومساعد المحقق الدولي غيرهالد ليمان ضِمن وثائقَ “حقيقة ليكس”، ومن خلال هذه الجلسة المسجلة صوتياً يكشف لماذا الصديق اصبح اقوى من الدولة وكيف استحصل على الحصانة التي مكنته من اتهام سوريا واربعة ضباط ومن تعطيل جلسات مجلس الوزراء وصولا الى هدم الحكومة ووفاقها.

    • Présenté dans ce blog :
      http://qifanabki.com/2011/01/15/saad-al-hariri-caught-on-tape-with-false-witness-muhammad-zuhair-al-siddi

      Well this is embarrassing. Lebanese TV station al-Jadeed has a major scoop tonight: a leaked recording of a meeting between Saad al-Hariri, Information Branch chief Colonel Wissam al-Hassan, STL deputy chief investigator Gerhard Lehmann, and Muhammad Zuhair al-Siddiq. You can watch the entire report below.

      Blog qui s’accroche à l’idée que ça ne va pas trop abîmer l’image de Saad Hariri...

    • Mentionné par L’Orient-Le Jour :
      http://www.lorientlejour.com/category/Liban/article/685229/La_chaine_New_TV_diffuse_un_entretien_presume_entre_Hariri_et_Siddiq.

      Selon l’enregistrement, M. Siddiq affirme au Premier ministre « détenir toute la vérité » sur l’assassinat de son père, et que le rapport de l’enquête « devrait inclure le nom de neuf Syriens et quatre Libanais ».
      Surnommé le « témoin roi », cet ancien officier syrien avait affirmé devant la commission d’enquête que l’ancien président libanais Émile Lahoud et le président syrien Bachar el-Assad avaient donné l’ordre d’assassiner Rafic Hariri, devenu opposé à l’hégémonie de Damas, ancienne puissance de tutelle au Liban. Le TSL avait indiqué par la suite que M. Siddiq ne l’intéressait pas.

    • Johsua Landis en parle sur Syria Comment :
      http://www.joshualandis.com/blog/?p=8097

      Al-Jadid TV [New TV] in Lebanon just aired this taped recording of a meeting that took place between Saad al-Hariri, Information Branch chief Colonel Wissam al-Hassan, STL deputy chief investigator Gerhard Lehmann, and Muhammad Zuhair al-Siddiq, one of the false witnesses whose testimony was used by Mehlis to accuse Syria for plotting the murder of Rafiq al-Hariri. It records the four men laying out a plan for how to convince the international community of Syria’s culpability. They all believe Syria to be the instigator of the killing. They agree that they must present the world with an air-tight case and lots of proof. Saddiq explains to Hariri that he tried to warn him of May Shidiyyaq’s attempted assassination two days ahead of time, but claims Hariri refused to answer it. Hariri asks Saddiq why he didn’t text him. Hariri calls Saddiq a “diarrhea mouth” to Mehlis’s lieutenant, but goes on to explain that he should be believed and is trustworthy. This is damaging to the Tribunal and Hariri because it shows how tainted Mehlis’ reports were and how eager the European investigators were to take at face value trumped up evidence. For Hariri, it is damaging because he swore that he had not met with Saddiq or any of the false witnesses.

    • Même le Nahar en a une dépêche :

      TV Station Broadcasts Alleged Conversation Between Hariri, Siddiq - Naharnet Newsdesk
      http://www.naharnet.com/domino/tn/NewsDesk.nsf/getstory?openform&24742291C4E41CACC225781A003308CD

      The TV station said the broadcast was intended to show a link between Hariri and Siddiq, whom March 8 forces describe as a false witness and the international tribunal does not recognize.

      Al-Jadid accused the caretaker premier of “hiding the truth and playing with the bloods of February 14 martyrs” in reference to the bombing that killed the former PM and 22 others.

      The meeting was also attended by former chief investigator Detlev Mehlis’ assistant Gerhard Lehmann and police intelligence chief Col. Wissam al-Hassan, according to the tape.

      In the audiotape, Siddiq told Hariri that the report of U.N. investigators probing his father’s assassination should name six Syrians and four Lebanese.

      [...]

      Al-Jadid did not give details as to how it obtained the audiotape but said that the Special Tribunal for Lebanon had a copy of it.

      New TV (Al Jadeed) a annoncé la diffusion d’un deuxième enregistrement ce soir dimanche.

    • Le bureau d’information de Hariri : la conversation de Siddiq en présence de Lehman a eu lieu à la demande de la commission d’enquête internationale - Politique - iloubnan.info
      http://www.iloubnan.info/politique/actualite/id/54362/titre/Le-bureau-d'information-de-Hariri:-la-conversation-de-Siddiq-en-présence-

      BEYROUTH - Concernant le rapport relatif à l’enregistrement de conversations ayant eu lieu dans le cadre de l’enquête sur l’attentat de Rafik Hariri et diffusé samedi soir par la chaîne de télévision Al-Jadid, le bureau d’information du Premier ministre sortant Saad Hariri a diffusé un communiqué indiquant ce qui suit :

      "La dernière conversation attribuée au président Saad Hariri et au colonel Wissam Hassan avec Mohammad Zouhair Siddiq en présence de l’adjoint du procureur général Gerhard Lehman a eu lieu à la demande de la commission d’enquête internationale qui a organisé cet entretien et chargé Lehman d’y assister. « La conversation a eu lieu mais la chaîne Al-Jadid a émis des paragraphes empreints de provocation médiatique afin de l’extraire de son contexte d’origine. Cette chaîne n’ajoute d’ailleurs aucun élément susceptible d’accélérer ou de retarder le cours de l’enquête », selon le bureau de Hariri.

      La contre-attaque est assez minable :

      « Cet enregistrement attribué à des témoins devant la commission d’enquête internationale est une affaire de renseignement par excellence qui nous pousse à nous poser des questions sur les visées de sa diffusion médiatique. »