position:investigator

  • Deux articles sur l’usage d’armes chimiques en Syrie.
    Carla Del Ponte, en charge de la Commission des Nations Unies sur la Syrie, indique ne pas détenir de preuve de l’implication du régime d’Assad dans l’usage d’armes chimiques. En revanche, elle fait valoir que de fortes suspicions pèsent sur l’opposition qui pourrait avoir utilisé du gas sarin. Ali Akbar Salehi, Ministre des Affaires étrangères d’Iran, émet la même hypothèse.

    Article 1
    U.N. has testimony that Syrian rebels used sarin gas: investigator
    Sun, May 05 (2013) 18:13 PM EDT

    http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSBRE94409Z20130505?irpc=932

    GENEVA (Reuters) - U.N. human rights investigators have gathered testimony from casualties of Syria’s civil war and medical staff indicating that rebel forces have used the nerve agent sarin, one of the lead investigators said on Sunday.

    The United Nations independent commission of inquiry on Syria has not yet seen evidence of government forces having used chemical weapons, which are banned under international law, said commission member Carla Del Ponte.

    “Our investigators have been in neighboring countries interviewing victims, doctors and field hospitals and, according to their report of last week which I have seen, there are strong, concrete suspicions but not yet incontrovertible proof of the use of sarin gas, from the way the victims were treated,” Del Ponte said in an interview with Swiss-Italian television.

    “This was use on the part of the opposition, the rebels, not by the government authorities,” she added, speaking in Italian.

    Del Ponte, a former Swiss attorney-general who also served as prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, gave no details as to when or where sarin may have been used.

    The Geneva-based inquiry into war crimes and other human rights violations is separate from an investigation of the alleged use of chemical weapons in Syria instigated by U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, which has since stalled.

    President Bashar al-Assad’s government and the rebels accuse each another of carrying out three chemical weapon attacks, one near Aleppo and another near Damascus, both in March, and another in Homs in December.

    The civil war began with anti-government protests in March 2011. The conflict has now claimed an estimated 70,000 lives and forced 1.2 million Syrian refugees to flee.

    The United States has said it has “varying degrees of confidence” that sarin has been used by Syria’s government on its people.

    President Barack Obama last year declared that the use or deployment of chemical weapons by Assad would cross a “red line”.

    (Reporting by Stephanie Nebehay; Editing by Tom Pfeiffer)

    Article 2
    Iran’s Salehi says chemical weapons ’red line’ in Syria
    30 avril 2013

    http://tehrantimes.com/politics/107297-irans-salehi-says-chemical-weapons-red-line-in-syria

    TEHRAN – Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi insisted on Tuesday that use of chemical weapons in Syria would also be a “red line” for Tehran, but suggests rebel forces should be investigated.

    According to ISNA news agency, Salehi said the use of chemical weapons “by anybody is our red line.” But he said opposition groups could have used chemical agents and demanded a UN probe.


  • Chris Kelly, #Kris_Kross rapper, dies at 34 in Atlanta hospital | Music | guardian.co.uk
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2013/may/02/kris-kross-chris-kelly-dies

    Chris “Mac Daddy” Kelly, one half of the 1990s rap duo Kris Kross, has died at an Atlanta hospital at the age of 34, a Fulton County Medical Examiner’s spokesman said on Wednesday.

    http://next.liberation.fr/musique/2013/05/02/un-chris-en-moins-dans-kris-kross_900407


  • U.N. chief scolds envoy for implying U.S. policy sparked Boston attack | Reuters
    http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/24/us-usa-explosions-un-idUSBRE93N16D20130424

    Richard Falk, U.N. special rapporteur for human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories, wrote on his blog on Sunday that “the American global domination project is bound to generate all kinds of resistance in the post-colonial world.”


  • UN Investigator: US Drone Strikes Violate Pakistan Sovereignty

    http://www.globalpolicy.org/international-justice/general-articles-on-international-justice/52352-un-investigator-us-drone-strikes-violate-pakistan-sovereignty.ht

    The UN Special Rapporteur on Counter-terrorism and Human Rights, Ben Emmerson, has released a statement declaring US drone strikes in Pakistan a violation of Pakistani sovereignty, and a contravention of international law. Emmerson has also claimed that the drone strikes are radicalizing certain segments of the population and may, therefore, be causing the very problem these counter-terrorist operations purport to eliminate. The statement is not expected to directly affect US policies regarding drone strikes.

    #drone




  • STL Registry: Nashabe Poses “Threat” to Tribunalhttp://english.al-akhbar.com/content/stl-registry-nashabe-poses-%E2%80%9Cthreat%E2%80%9D-tribunal

    The appointment of Omar Nashabe, Director of Al-Akhbar’s research unit, to the defense office of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon has led to a crisis between the office and the court Registry. A security assessment by the STL found Nashabe “to be a ‘high’ threat to the Tribunal,” while head of the defense office François Roux defended his recruitment.



  • Des meurtres injustifiés : l’ONU demande aux Etats-Unis de justifier les attaques de drones par RT
    http://www.legrandsoir.info/des-meurtres-injustifies-l-onu-demande-aux-etats-unis-de-justifier-les

    Un enquêteur de l’ONU a demandé à Washington de justifier l’augmentation de l’utilisation de drones militaires pour perpétrer des assassinats ciblés. Il dit que les attaques de drones qui ôtent la vie à beaucoup d’innocents, pourraient violer le droit international.

    L’armée étasunienne et la CIA utilisent des #drones en Afghanistan, Pakistan, Irak, Yémen et Somalie. Washington doit clarifier la base légale de sa politique d’assassiner des leaders et des membres présumés des Talibans et d’Al Qaeda au lieu d’essayer de les capturer selon un rapport de Christof Heyns, le rapporteur spécial des exécutions sommaires, extrajudiciaires, ou arbitraires. Ce rapport de 28 pages adressé au Conseil des droits humains de l’ONU a été publié en avant-première du débat de cet organisme sur le sujet à Genève.


  • The UN would like the White House to please explain all the #drone killings | Death and Taxes
    http://www.deathandtaxesmag.com/184803/the-un-would-like-the-white-house-to-please-explain-all-the-drone-

    UN investigator Christof Heyns issued a report to the United Nations Human Rights Council ahead of a debate it’s scheduled to have later today, in which he called on the US to please explain the rash of drone killings which have escalated under President Obama, killing civilians along the way.
    Reuters reports: “Citing figures from the Pakistan Human Rights Commission, he said U.S. drone strikes killed at least 957 people in Pakistan in 2010 alone. Thousands have been killed in 300 drone strikes there since 2004, 20 percent of whom are believed to be civilians.”


  • The Draft Anti-Terrorism Law in Saudi Arabia: Legalizing the Abrogation of Civil Liberties
    http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/4839/the-draft-anti-terrorism-law-in-saudi-arabia_legal

    Widespread criticism of the law has been voiced internally, by local activists, and internationally, with Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch leading the way. Unlike the US Patriot Act and the Terrorism Act 2006 of Great Britain, both of which allowed for tremendous expansions of state power, the proposed Anti-Terror Law seems designed to legitimize already-existing extra-judicial practices of the Saudi state by cloaking them in the rule of law. With broad support for legal reforms, continued protests and civil disobedience, and public debate growing over the injustices suffered by Saudi prisoners of conscience, the Anti-Terror Law seeks to forestall any movement towards enhanced legal protections.

    The regime response was limited to a letter written by the Saudi Ambassador in London, emphasizing that the Anti-Terror Law provides both for the need to deal with terrorism within a legal framework, and for the protection of the “legitimate rights of suspects.” What has been neglected in this exchange between officials and critics is that the unapplied 2002 Law of Criminal Procedure (LCP) already exists to ensure a speedy, fair, and inexpensive trial, while guaranteeing basic rights. While the LCP is not without its flaws, unlike the proposed Anti-Terrorism Law, it limits the discretionary power of the Ministry of Interior and provides a foundation for a broader set of legal reforms.


  • L’Otan aurait pu les sauver, ils ont choisi de ne pas le faire

    The Guardian
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/mar/28/left-to-die-migrants-boat-inquiry

    Migrants left to die after catalogue of failures, says report into boat tragedy

    Council of Europe investigator says deaths of migrants adrift in Mediterranean exposes double standards in valuing human life

    Jack Shenker, guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 28 March 2012 20.35 BST

    Abu Kurke Kebato, one of the boat’s survivors, said he hoped the Council of Europe report would put pressure on Nato and Europe to unravel why his friends were left to die.

    A catalogue of failures by Nato warships and European coastguards led to the deaths of dozens of migrants left adrift at sea, according to a damning official report into the fate of a refugee boat in the Mediterranean whose distress calls went unanswered for days.

    A nine-month investigation by the Council of Europe – the continent’s 47-nation human rights watchdog, which oversees the European court of human rights – has unearthed human and institutional failings that condemned the boat’s occupants to their fate.


  • Nouvelle conférence de presse de Hassan Nasrallah.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRkOj_P8bDQ&feature=player_embedded#at=1940

    À la 30e minute, document explosif : une vidéo montrant Gehrard Lehmann, le second de Detlev Mehlis dans l’enquête sur l’assassinat de Hariri, encaissant un pot de vin pour révéler des informations sur l’enquête. C’est proprement sidérant. (Si j’ai bien compris, ces images sont complétées par des enregistrements audio.)

    Évidemment, vous n’entendez pas plus parler de ce document en France que vous n’avez entendu parler des précédents enregistrements mettant directement en cause l’enquête internationale.

    Mise à jour, août 2011 : la vidéo réfèrencée initialement n’est plus en ligne. On trouve désormais une version doublée en anglais, découpée en plusieurs parties :
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exudcwSPEP8


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z07uU1ifToU

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ozipT0OoGs

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyMkY8xinus

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X67xBhWQ_Vk

    #liban #hezbollah #tsl

    • Hizbollah leader rules out arrests of members - FT.com
      http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/b807739c-a526-11e0-8df9-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1R1Htna1j

      Mr Nasrallah said the international committee investigating the killing had shipped 97 computers used in the probe via the Jewish state. He also aired a video purporting to show a senior tribunal official taking bank notes from a man seated with his back to the camera.
      The Hizbollah leader alleged that the tribunal official was being paid for information about the probe. He also alleged links between top tribunal officials and western. intelligence agencies.

      [...]

      Last year, Mr Nasrallah showed footage allegedly intercepted from spy planes, which seemed to show Israel monitoring the routes Hariri’s convoy took from parliament to his home in west Beirut. Hariri was killed in a bomb attack on his convoy in February 2005.

    • Hizballah Leader Stands Defiant Amidst Hariri Assassination Indictments - TIME
      http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2081285,00.html

      One of the clips featured Robert Baer, TIME’s intelligence analyst and a former CIA officer who operated in Beirut in the 1980s, who it claimed worked with the tribunal.

      Baer confirmed to TIME.com that he had previously served as a consultant to the tribunal, but denied he had any continuing professional connections to the CIA and was confident that various US intelligence agencies had not cooperated “on an operational level” with the tribunal.

      “The CIA, for a fact, was not helping the tribunal. I know that,” he told TIME.com. “The Department of Justice, the FBI and the CIA steadfastly refused to give any information [to the tribunal] on Mustafa Badreddine and all those other guys... they have been very wary about the tribunal’s case.”

      Another video clip apparently filmed by a hidden camera, showed Gerhard Lehmann, deputy to Detlev Mehlis, the first UN chief investigator in the Hariri case, receiving and riffling through a wad of bank notes. “Lehmann has ties to the Israelis and got paid in return for selling certain reports pertaining to the murder probe,” a voice-over said.

    • Nasrallah blasts STL, rejects arrest warrants - Daily Star
      http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Politics/2011/Jul-02/Hezbollah-chief-to-address-Hariri-probe-indictment.ashx#axzz1R1JlqqUJ

      The Hezbollah chief’s speech, which lasted over an hour, was interspersed with video presentations with evidence claiming to show how members of the STL had affiliations with Western intelligence agencies, including an Australian with alleged ties to a U.S. intelligence agency, a British investigator, claimed to be an expert on fighting Islamic terrorism, a former American officer, a French-Lebanese legal consultant for the STL who allegedly worked against the resistance and Robert Baer, who Nasrallah said was a CIA agent.

      Nasrallah also took aim at Gerhard Lehman, the former deputy president of the investigative committee in the case of the assassination of Hariri.

      “We will reveal a case ... where Lehman sold affidavits and confessions for money,” Nassrallah said before Al-Manar aired footage of Lehman allegedly receiving money in return for documents related to the investigation

    • Hezbollah chief says Hariri Court has ties with Western intelligence agencies
      http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/world/2011-07/03/c_13962507.htm

      Nasrallah revealed that one of the advisors to STL Prosecutor Daniel Bellemare was a top CIA agent that was tasked with tracking Hezbollah’s slain top military commander Imad Mughniyeh.

      Nasrallah also described investigators looking into the Hariri assassination and some of the STL staff as “biased and corrupted.”

      Nasrallah also showed footage of Gerhard Lehmann, top investigator in the United Nations International Independent Investigation Commission (UNIIIC) to inspect the Hariri assassination, receiving a sum of money for information on the investigation he divulged.

      The black-turbaned cleric questioned the reason why the UNIIIC shipped 97 computers to The Hague from Israel rather than regular routes such as the Lebanese port and airport. He also showed a voucher issued from the Israeli Customs to that effect.

    • Nasrallah implies Israel behind Hariri murder - Middle East - Al Jazeera English
      http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2011/07/201172183540290278.html

      Speaking on Saturday in a telelvised speech, Nasrallah said that computers related to the case investigated by the STL were transported through Israel on their way out of Lebanon and asked why they had not been shipped out of a Beirut port?

      He said Hezbollah would produce a document that proving the computers were transported from South Lebanon to Israel.

      Speaking from Beirut, Jamal Wakim of the Lebanese International University told Al Jazeera that the charges over computer data were “the most important point” in the speech.

      [...]

      Nasrallah also revealed that he had received a document from the Qatari prime minister and Turkey’s foreign minister, which stated that Saad Hariri, the son of Rafik who was toppled as Lebanon’s prime minister earlier this year, had agreed to a set of demands, including abandoning the STL process, if he could stay on as premier.

      Nasrallah said he would reveal the document to the public at a later date if the need arose, but that the message conveyed to him was that it was approved by the Saudis, French, British and US.

    • AFP: Hezbollah rules out arrests in ’void’ UN Hariri case
      http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5ijTCtDxBx4YNfXYrLjXTQpjrZywQ?docId=CNG.8afa091e5483810446b19e5247e325f

      He accused the STL of corruption and of having intentionally leaked information to the press in recent years to tarnish the image of Hezbollah, founded in 1982.

      In elaborately edited segments, the Hezbollah-controlled Al-Manar television aired footage which Nasrallah said showed former UN investigator Gerhard Lehmann receiving a wad of cash in exchange for documents in the Hariri case.

      Al-Manar also aired a document which Nasrallah said proved investigators had transferred IT equipment across Lebanon’s southern border into Israel when it moved its staff to the Netherlands in 2009.

    • Daily Star - Bellemare team have links to Western intelligence agencies
      http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Politics/2011/Jul-02/Bellemares-team-of-investigators-have-linkts-to-Western-intelligence-a

      Hezbollah leader Sayyed Hasan Nasrallah said that Special Tribunal for Lebanon Daniel Bellemare’s team of consultants and investigators have ties to Western intelligence agencies. 

      Al-Manar TV revealed what it claimed was detailed information about the five members of Bellemare’s team who had previously worked as intelligence agents in Lebanon, including one who was CIA agent.

    • Il est très spectaculaire de constater que nombre d’autres journalistes relatent le même discours de Nasrallah, mais semblent n’y avoir pas vu aucune des innombrables vidéos qui constituent pourtant l’essentiel de la conférence de presse.

      Dans les médias suivants, le sujet est bien la conférence de presse de Nasrallah, mais il n’est fait rigoureusement aucune mention des documents et accusations présentés par Nasrallah et qui en constituent le thème et le contenu principaux.

      BBC News - Hezbollah reject Hariri arrest calls
      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-14004722

      Voice of America - Hezbollah Rules Out Arrests in Hariri Murder Case
      http://www.voanews.com/english/news/middle-east/Hezbollah-Rules-Out-Arrests-in-Hariri-Murder-Case-124918554.html

      Hizbollah rules out arrests | News.com.au
      http://www.news.com.au/world/hizbollah-rules-out-arrests/story-fn6sb9br-1226086399832

      Hizballah Defends Hariri Suspects in Lebanon - Bassem Mroue (AP/TIME)
      http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2081272,00.html

      Hezbollah leader rejects Hariri court indict... JPost (Reuters)
      http://www.jpost.com/Headlines/Article.aspx?id=227593

      Hezbollah leader says Israel was behind Hariri killing - CNN.com
      http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/meast/07/02/lebanon.nasrallah.hariri

    • En français, sur Google News, je ne trouve que 3 articles. Spectaculaire encore, aucun n’évoque les éléments présentés par Nasrallah.

      Liban : Le Hezbollah exclut l’arrestation de quatre suspects de son mouvement | International | Radio-Canada.ca
      http://www.radio-canada.ca/nouvelles/International/2011/07/02/010-liban-arrestations-hezbollah.shtml

      Nasrallah dénonce les mandats émis par le Tribunal sur le Liban - 20minutes.fr (Reuters)
      http://www.20minutes.fr/ledirect/751947/nasrallah-denonce-mandats-emis-tribunal-liban

      Mort de Hariri : Nasrallah exclut l’arrestation de 4 suspects du Hezbollah - Fil news - TF1 News
      http://lci.tf1.fr/filnews/monde/mort-de-hariri-nasrallah-exclut-l-arrestation-de-4-suspects-du-6561488.html

    • Autant aller à la source : voici le compte-rendu qu’en fait la chaîne de télé du Hezbollah. Je le reproduis intégralement, histoire de corriger quelques coquilles dans certains noms.
      http://www.almanar.com.lb/french/adetails.php?fromval=1&cid=18&eid=21702&frid=18

      Dans la première réaction du Hezbollah, sur la remise de l’acte d’accusation lié à l’assassinat de l’ancien Premier ministre Rafic Hariri, le secrétaire général du Hezbollah, sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, a exclu l’arrestation des quatre accusés cités dans les mandats d’arrêt.

      « Ce tribunal est pour nous un pur produit israélo-américain. Sur cette base-là, nous rejetons ce tribunal et tous les verdicts et les accusations nuls et non avenus qui en émanent ». « Aucune force ne pourra arrêter ceux qui sont mentionnés dans l’acte d’accusation (...). Il ne sera pas possible de les arrêter ni dans 30 jours, ni dans 30 ans ni dans 300 ans », a affirmé sayyed Nasrallah, dans un discours de plus d’une heure retransmis en direct par la télévision, Al-Manar.

      Sayyed Nasrallah a également mis en relief, documents et vidéos à l’appui, la corruption des enquêteurs et leurs liaisons avec des services de renseignements étrangers, notamment la CIA. Il a également révélé le transfert de 97 ordinateurs vers l’entité sioniste. Sayyed Nasrallah a enfin écarté toute possibilité de nouvelle guerre civile ou d’affrontements entre musulmans sunnites et chiites.

      Voici les principaux points de son discours :

      La raison de mon discours est la publication de l’acte d’accusation à l’encontre des résistants ayant un passé honorable dans la résistance contre l’occupation israélienne au Liban. Cet acte d’accusation fait partie d’un long trajet qui a commencé à paraitre après la défaite d’Israël en été 2006. Quelques jours après la victoire de la résistance, Le Figaro a publié un article dans lequel il annonce que des membres du Hezbollah seront accusés dans l’assassinat de Rafic Hariri. Ils ont commencé par la Syrie, puis les quatre généraux (libanais), et après ils nous ont accusé. L’objectif du Tribunal Spécial pour le Liban (TSL), est de ternir l’image de la résistance et a pour objectif de semer la division au Liban, et entre sunnites et chiites.

      L’Enquête et les enquêteurs

      Un de nos problématiques concernant l’enquête est qu’il se base sur une hypothèse, la Syrie, les généraux et le Hezbollah. Pourquoi ils ne prennent pas en en considération l’hypothèse de l’implication israélienne dans l’assassinat de l’ancien Premier ministre. J’avais présenté plusieurs preuves concernant la présence d’espions et d’avions israéliens au dessus du Saint-Georges (lieu de l’attentat).

      Mais le procureur général du tribunal les a ignorées, se contentant de demandant une copie de la conférence (tenue par sayyed Nasrallah). Au lieu de d’interroger les israéliens ils ont coopéré avec eux, c’est ce qu’a reconnu (le juge) Detlev Mehlis, dans une interview avec Le Figaro, il en est de même pour (son adjoint) Gerhard Lehman.

      Transfert de 97 ordinateurs vers Israël

      Après le début du travail du TSL, les enquêteurs et les équipements de la commission d’enquête ont été évacués du Liban. Le tribunal n’a plus qu’un bureau au Liban, tous ont quitté via l’aéroport de Beyrouth, à l’exception des 97 ordinateurs. Ces ordinateurs ont été transférés chez qui en Israël, surtout qu’il est l’un des pays les plus développés au niveau de la technologie.

      Preuves à l’appui

      Lors de son discours, la chaine AlManar diffuse un document signé par le secteur douanier israélien affirmant le transfert des 97 ordinateurs liés à l’enquête vers Israël.

      Liaisons des enquêteurs avec la CIA

      Pour la crédibilité de l’enquête le tribunal aurait dû adopter des enquêteurs neutres, or les experts, les officiers et les conseillers du tribunal ont des passés négatifs à l’encontre de la résistance et dans la collaboration avec la CIA.

      Un des grands officiers de la CIA a travaillé 15 ans contre le Hezbollah et a participé au massacre de Bir Abed en 1984, qui visait le défunt sayyed Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah, et a coûté la vie à près de cent personnes.

      Documents à l’appui

      Lors de son discours, la télévision Al-Manar a diffusé des informations sur Nick Kaldas, un des enquêteurs qui est un des officiers dans la police australienne, lié aux services de renseignements américains, il a travaillé pour les Américains en Irak en 2004.

      Michael Taylor, britannique, responsable de l’enquête du TSL depuis 2010, il est un ancien chef des services de renseignements britanniques, il est spécialisé dans la lutte contre contre le « terrorisme islamique ».

      Doreid Bouchrawi, conseiller juridique dans le TSL, un libano-français, connu pour ses positions hostiles au Hezbollah et son rôle dans les faux-témoins.

      Robert Baer, un des officiers de la CIA, expert dans les mouvements islamiques notamment le Hezbollah. En 1985, il a participé à l’assassinat de Sayyed Fadlallah tuant et blessant plus de 300 personnes. Une de ses missions consistait à traquer l’un des dirigeants de la résistance Imad Moghniyé. Il a avoué, dans une interview avec une chaine arabe, d’avoir travaillé près de 15 ans pour le kidnapper.

      Cette équipe est-elle compétente ? Certains d’entre eux sont des assassins ou espions et la plupart d’entre eux collaborent avec la CIA. Cette équipe pourrait accepter l’hypothèse de l’implication d’Israël ?

      La corruption des enquêteurs

      La corruption vient s’ajouter à l’agressivité des enquêteurs et à leur subjectivité. Nous allons parlé du vice-president de la commission d’enquête Gerhard Lehman. Pour des dizaines de milliers de dollars il vend des documents liés à l’enquête.

      Preuves à l’appui

      Une vidéo montrant Lehman en train de prendre l’argent en échange de la vente des documents.

      Comme vous l’avez vu il est content en prenant l’argent. Il a même retéléphoné pour demander l’argent en échange d’autres informations liées à l’enquête.

      Implication de la commission d’enquête dans les faux-témoins

      Bellemare a personnellement travaillé à la levée de la poursuite par l’Interpol de Zouheir Siddiq (fameux faux-témoin). Je promets de présenter des preuves là-dessus plus tard.

      Antonio Cassesse grand ami d’Israël

      Le président du Tribunal, Antonio Cassesse, est un grand ami d’Israël selon l’un de ses amis lors de la conférence Herziliya (institut sioniste d’études politiques et stratégiques).

      Vidéo à l’appui

      Le 3 fév. 2010, lors de la conférence Herzilya, le professeur américain George Fletcher, dit : Antonio Cassesse n’a pas pu venir participer à cette conférence, il est l’un des grands amis d’Israël et un de nos amis.

      En 2006, Cassesse envoie une lettre adressée aux autorités israéliennes dans laquelle il affirme qu’Israël est la seul pays démocratique dans la région, et qui respecte les droits de l’Homme. Dans cette lettre Cassesse reconnait qu’Israël a occupé Gaza mais considère que les gazaouis ont eu recours à la violence et au terrorisme.

      Sayyed commente les positions de Cassesse

      Les 11000 détenus par Israël, les massacres israéliens au Liban et ailleurs font partie du respect des droits de l’Homme. Comment un homme pareil serait-il compétent de trouver la vérité dans l’assassinat de Hariri ?

      Position du Hezbollah à l’égard de l’acte d’accusation

      Aux gens :

      Je dis aux gens ne prêtez pas l’oreille à ce que les Israéliens disent aujourd’hui du Liban. Il n’y aura pas de zizanie entre Libanais et entre les sunnites et chiites. Il n’y aura pas de guerre civile.

      Aux forces du 14 mars :

      Ne faites pas porter la responsabilité de ce dossier à Mikati. S’il y avait ajourd’hui un gouvernement qui n’est pas présidé par Mikati mais par Saad Hariri ou Siniora, est-ce que ce gouvernement pourraient arrêter ces personnes ? Aucune force ne pourra arrêter ceux qui sont mentionnés dans l’acte d’accusation (...) Il ne sera pas possible de les arrêter ni dans 30 jours, ni dans 30 ans ni dans 300 ans. Les choses iront jusqu’au procès par contumace, le verdict est déjà prêt. Donc ne demandez pas du gouvernement de Mikati ce qu’il est incapable de faire et il en est de même pour vous.

      Lettre signée par Saad Hariri en échange de rester au pouvoir

      Ne demandez pas au gouvernement de Mikati ce que Saad Hariri a accepté de faire en échange de rester au pouvoir. Si vous voulez (députés du 14 mars) je vous envoie une copie dans ce sens. Le Premier ministre qatarie et le ministre des affaires étrangère turc nous ont livré ce document accepté par Hariri, les français, le turcs, les syriens et même Clinton étaient prêts à le signer, mais nous l’avons refusé pour des raisons nationales.

      Aux sympathisants de la résistance

      Ne vous inquiétez pas, c’est une partie de la guerre que la résistance affronte depuis la création de l’entité sioniste en 1948. Ce sont les conséquences du choix de la résistance et de la libération de la Palestine. Nous sommes déterminés à poursuivre le choix de la résistance avec courage et force. Il y a certains qui veulent vous provoquer, il y a certains politiciens au Liban qui veulent la divisions, je veux le dire, il y a certains chrétiens des forces du 14 mars qui rêvent de voir une division entre sunnites et chiites. Enfin, cette résistance – avant le tribunal, Cassesse et Mellis et tous ceux qui les soutiennent – va très bien et ne vous inquiétez pas pour elle.

    • Angry Arab – Nasrallah speech: the Hariri tribunal saga
      http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2011/07/nasrallah-speech-hariri-tribunal-saga.html

      Nasrallah’s speech yesterday was full of drama. As a TV show, it was quite effective. I polled my readers on Facebook and they were uniformly impressed (and most of those who contribute on my wall are rather secular). But make no mistake about it: it is doubtful that he won new converts inside Lebanon: minds are made, and nothing can change them in the sectarianly divided lousy homeland.

      There was a skillful use of images and music and short clips and texts. It was well-prepared, but not as well-prepared as it would have been. There were sections that had high drama of documentation, but there were other sections that had no documentation or evidence. So it was mixed.

      He was (unlike appearances from the last two years) relaxed and not agitated or angry. He came across as confident. So it worked well, for his own home front, and for those who support resistance against Israel. And even for the community of the Hariri camp: public opinion surveys do indicate that the credibility of the court has been declining among Sunnis and Christians. Suspicion of Israel is very common (and justified, of course). But I am not necessarily convinced that the Israel killed Hariri: Israel should be the most usual suspect for any and every crime in our region given its long consistent record of crimes, atrocities and murders. But I still believe that Hariri was good for Israel, and that Israel would have benefited from his reign, especially that his son is such an incompetent fool, literally really.

      Nasrallah began by revealing information about the military consultants to the court. This is information that we did not know at all. He basically said that those military men are linked to US intelligence, but here he failed to provide any evidence or documentation.

      He then dwelled on the case of Robert Baer: and he revealed (I never knew this before) that he is a consultant to the court. Now that in itself is damning. That this guy whose official job in Lebanon was to chase and hunt down key Hizbullah figures is assigned to advise the court on its work. Most incredible. Imagine if the UN team that investigated Israeli war crimes in Gaza hired Khalid Mish`al or his security adviser as a consultant to the UN team. Very damning indeed. (Personally, I think that Baer is an interesting writer but tends to exaggerate, and his list of languages that he claims he knows, makes me even more skeptical about his tall tales. But his first book is a good read: the one on Saudi Arabia has nothing new, although I appreciate his criticisms of US foreign policy toward Saudi Arabia. On Israel, I find Baer to be inconsistent: he speaks one way to Fox News, and another way to Arab media). But that section of the speech was revealing in terms of names but needed further documentation (like what is the evidence that the Egyptian-Australian military guy works closely with the Americans?).

      Then Nasrallah provided a most unusual document: a copy of a Israeli custom manifest that shows the transfer of 97 computers. Nasrallah claimed that the Hariri investigating team in Beirut, decided to transfer their computers through Israel, for no apparent reason. But An-Nahar today, claimed in response that this document talks about computers belonging to the Armistice committees and not to the Hariri investigating team. An-Nahar (the right-wing, sectarian Christian, racist anti-Syrian (people), anti-Palestinian (people), must have been tipped off by Israel. But still: what people will see in this section is the wide reach of Hizbullah intelligence. Living in the era of the failures of Arab intelligence against Israel, this ability to obtain a copy of Israeli custom document will impress the hell out of Arab audiences who were glued to the screen.

      Nasrallah then talked about the pro-Israeli biases of the president of the Hariri tribunal, Antonio Cassese. Here, the finding was due to pure diligence of Hizbullah researchers: through thorough google work, they stumbled upon a document in which Cassese advises the Israeli government and makes clear his admiration fo the terrorist state of Israel. He then showed a clip from a “security” conference in Israel, where the chair of one panel identified Cassesse as “great friend of Israel.” That, to me, and to any fair minded person, is damning enough to disqualify the guy. Imagine, again, if the UN appoints a judge to a panel investigating some Israeli crime, and puts a guy as president who was identified by a Hizbullah official as “great friend of Hizbullah.” This is rather absurd that the US/Israel (which in my mind run the affair of the Hariri tribunal) would appoint such a person, and not think that Arabs (who they view as dumb) would find out.

      And there was a Candid Camera moment in the show when a clip showed deputy to Mehlis, Gerhard Lehmann, taking a bribe for his sale of audio-tapes (they were subsequently sold to New TV in Beirut).

      There are so many holes dug into the case that, no matter who was guilty, the Justice Department would have dismissed the case if this was run here in the US. No evidence can now save the reputation of the court. Also, no one in the US media mentions, but so many people have resigned from the court in the last few years.

      PS. Nada Bakri (who is a fine and fair reporter on Lebanon) did not mention any of the content of Nasrallah speech in her piece today. She, like those articles in Saudi-funded Arabic press, merely mentioned that he rejected the indictment.


  • La réaction de Angry Arab aux mandats d’arrêts émis par le TSL.
    http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2011/06/hariri-tribunal_30.html

    I rarely comment on this silly exercise. Comrade Omar Nashabe of Al-Akhbar has written extensively on all the problems that mar the process of this potato court. Where do you begin?
    – The first German investigator Mellis who gave political interviews right and left and never hid his political agenda?
    – The fact that the Western press has UNIFORMLY covered up the corruption of the case? Did any US newspaper report that the second-in-command of the court went around offer sales of tapes of interviews with key witnesses and New TV obtained them and aired them?
    – That what we heard from those tapes show beyond the shadow of a doubt that this was a most unprofessional and corrupt proceeding, even in comparison to the corrupt justice system in Lebanon?
    – That the Hariri family were allowed to control the entire affair and to provide witnesses some of whom turned out to be false witnesses?
    – That we have a tape in which Hariri and his aides are feeding and influencing the testimony of the worst false witness in the case, Muhammad Zuhayr As-Siddiq?
    – That the meetings with the tirbunal’s people were clearly (from the tapes of New TV) chit chat sessions? American traffic courts are run more professionally.
    – Or the negotiations between the court and the Hariri family to delay the release of the four generals? Or the arrest of the four generals for purely political reasons? One of the four generals talked about how he got an offer for cooperation if he fingered Syria.
    – And what about those Wikileaks documents that show court’s higher ups taking instructions from US diplomats?
    – And about an investigation that started with a premise and ruled out any ally of the US from the suspects’ list?
    – And what about the shift in targeting from Syria to Hizbullah following shifts in US and Saudi foreign policies?
    – What about the timing? All this time and just as the cabinet in Lebanon was forming, they release the report and leak the names? All this is a coincidence?
    – And was one Israeli official ever questioned (although I believe that Rafiq Hariri was a good friend of Israel and its interests in Lebanon and for that I never mourned him but I did mourn the innocent civilians who died there – car bombs are nasty, man).
    – And what about the series of resignation from the court? And what about the way in which the court officially refused to address legal concerns of the four generals? Do you have doubts that the court is run from the Near East section of the State Department? Who are you fooling?

    Today, they leaked that they will accuse Syria and Hizbullah, but why not Venezuela and Cuba? Why not point the finger at every enemy of the US and Israel? Why not Hamas too? You think anyone is taking the court seriously? Look at public opinion polls in Lebanon, even among Sunnis. Hasan Nasrallah did an excellent job in discredit the court in Lebanese and Arab eyes. This is a joke, really.

    So they leaked the name of four Hizbullah members (supplied by ISRAEL NO DOUBT). What is next? Will Sa`d Hariri take his supporters to the southern suburbs to arrest the accused? What will the “international community” – how I hate that word which is used to hide not so sneakily the heavy handed US role in international affairs – do? What can they do? Freeze the assets of Hasan Nasrallah in the US and Europe? Or will they ban him from traveling with his grand kids to Disneyland?

    As we say in Lebanon, go play in the garden. Israel killed more than 1300 civilians in the July war on Lebanon in 2006, and you want me to spend sleepless nights wondering who killed a man who did so much to cause destruction and discord in Lebanon? I don’t care to know who killed Hariri and Sa`d Hariri is not the first creature to lose his father. I lost my father but never brought Lebanon to the brink of civil war. Take down all the pictures and statues of Rafiq Hariri and move his grave site to Sidon – to the Garbage Mountain there.

    PS. It bothers me how submissive the mainstream US press is to the dictates of US government. I don’t recall reading one negative article about Hariri in any US newspaper. Not one. I cant recall reading one in the British press – and I am not talking about Robert Fisk who is an unreliable weaver of tales and peddler of Hariri press office releases.


  • Syria Comment » Archives » The Man Who Wrote the Mehlis Report on Rafiq al-Hariri’s Murder Claims Third Witness was a “full-blown mythomaniac”
    http://www.joshualandis.com/blog/?p=9596

    Swedish public television (SVT1) just aired an episode of Uppdrag granskning, a popular show specialized in tracking down government abuses and miscarriages of justice. This episode was headlined “Don’t fuck with the UN”, and concerned a witness in the UN International Independent Investigation Commission (UNIIIC) for the Mehlis report. Below is a summary of the show, which can be seen in its entirety here. It’s in Swedish, but some of the interviews and taped segments are in original English.

    On n’a donc jamais fini de rigoler avec l’enquête Mehlis. Évidemment, les médias français ne nous parleront à nouveau pas de cette émission suédoise ; en ce moment, elles sont trop occupées à dénoncer les « théories du complot » plusieurs fois par minute.

    #hariri #Mehlis #liban


  • Il y a quelques jours, le Washington Post a présenté, au monde émerveillé, le nouveau leader de l’opposition syrienne, Ammar Abdulhamid :

    Syrian rebels don’t want U.S. aid, at least for now - Washington Times
    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/mar/27/syrian-rebels-dont-want-us-aid-at-least-for-now

    Ammar Abdulhamid, who has emerged as an unofficial spokesman in the West for the activists organizing the Syrian protests...

    Angry Arab n’a pas tardé à faire remarquer à quel point cette prétention était ridicule :
    http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2011/03/this-is-hilarious-when-western.html

    This is hilarious: when Western countries select leaders for the region
    They decided that a Syrian living in Washington, DC is the leader of the protests.  I wonder how many Syrians actually know who he is. (thanks Ahmet)

    Joshua Landis (Syria Comment), dans un article apparemment neutre, rappelle des infos bien gênantes :
    http://www.joshualandis.com/blog/?p=8864

    Déjà présenté par le WaPo en juillet 2004, l’homme a trouvé l’équation idéale (ancien super-musulman donc légitime, mais plus musulman du tout donc rassurant pour le lecteur du WaPo) :

    Ammar Abdulhamid is no Islamist. He did flirt with Islam and the notion of going to Afghanistan during a difficult period of introspection after dropping out of University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, but pulled away from the lures of fundamentalism. “It gave my life structure, but it enslaved the hell out of me,” he told the Washington Post’s Nora Boustany. Eventually he abandoned Islam for atheism and ultimately became an “agnostic.”

    Notez bien : il pense aller en Afghanistan en... 1988. Contre les russes, donc. Pas contre les américains. (Ouf.)

    Mais, dès 2005, il rejoint le Saban Center, think tank fondé par Haim Saban, dirigé par Martin Indyk, et décrit par John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt comme un élément du lobby pro-israélien.

    He was appointed a visiting fellow at the Saban Center of the Brookings Institute in Washington DC, shortly after he had established the Tharwa Project [...] in June 2004.

    À l’instar d’une Joumana Haddad, c’est un auteur écrivant sur un passionnant sujet à la con, mais totalement dans l’air du temps (ce qui en fait, je suppose, le Carrie Bradshaw de Damas) :

    He is the author of a prize winning novel, Menstruation: A Novel, that depicts how the culture of Islam in Syria is sexually and morally repressive.

    En novembre 2005, le gars soutient le rapport Mehlis avec ferveur dans le quotidien libanais Daily Star (il se présente comme « Visiting Fellow » pour le Saban Center for Middle East Policy). Aujourd’hui, plus personne ne se réfère au rapport Mehlis, sauf pour le désavouer.
    http://www.mafhoum.com/press9/256P5.htm

    In making up his mind on the next steps, Assad needs to consider that the Mehlis report was only a preliminary document prepared for the sake of getting an extension of the UN probe and securing Syrian cooperation. Mehlis did not put everything he had in the report and did not divulge all the pieces of evidence. This includes more taped conversations with Syrian officials, both alive and recently dead, as well as testimony by more credible witnesses whose identity still needs to be protected.

    En 2005, il rejoint le Front de salut national en Syrie d’Abdel Halim Khaddam et Ali Sadreddine Bayanouni.

    Following the 2005 defection of Syria’s long time Vice President Abdul Halim Khaddam, who founded the National Salvation Front in cooperation with the long-time leader of Syria’s Muslim Brotherhood, Bayanuni, Ammar decided to join opposition politics directly. Abdulhamid worked to gain the NSF a place in Washington and recognition from the Bush administration. It was successful in opening an office in Washington DC, largely thanks to Ammar’s connections and support, despite considerable reluctance on the part of US lawmakers to support any organization associated to the Muslim Brotherhood.

    Selon Landis, il quitte cet attelage trop ouvertement associé à l’administration Bush (en 2007 ?) :

    Ammar quite the National Salvation Front in 2007 shortly before it was dissolved at the time the Obama administration took office.

    Avec un curriculum pareil, il semble impossible de ne pas être proclamé représentant d’un truc arabe quelconque par le Washington Post.

    • En 2008, Bush :
      http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/abdulhamid5/English

      America’s “freedom agenda” is not the cause of its current travails in the Middle East. The problem has been a lack of consistency in promoting the agenda, failure to develop broader international support for it, and the behavior of the US itself, which has presented it as a martial plan, rather than a Marshall Plan.

      Whatever the cause of these shortcomings, the lesson that US and Europe policymakers should draw is that the objective – facilitating democratization and modernization – remains valid, despite the need for a change in tactics.

      [...]

      Despite Bush’s mixed record, he still seems to share this hope. Will the same be true of America’s next president?


  • Stop the press!

    FLASH: New TV has its own Audio-LEAKS: EXPLOSIVE
    http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2011/01/flash-new-tv-has-its-own-audio-leaks.html

    New TV in Beirut just aired an audio tape with mini-Hariri and his chief of intelligence, Wisam Hasan, and German Hariri investigator, Gerhard Lehmann, and... the FAMOUS FALSE WITNESS, MUHAMMAD ZUHAYR AS-SIDDIQ (the most famous of the false witness who has woven so many fabrications about who was responsible for the Hariri investigation and who has been aided by French intelligence and Dubai intelligence). The significance of the audio tape can’t be overstated: this will officially put the last nail in the coffin of the Hariri tribunal. Hariri has officially denied any knowledge of the “false witnesses” and in this meeting he seems to be receiving orders from Siddiq himself. Now we know why the Hariri camp has been fiercely opposing the demand by the opposition to refer the “false witness” matter to the Justice Council in Lebanon. Of course, the testimony of Saddiq was the only reason why the “four generals” were incarcerated. Now you see why I never bothered to take the Hariri tribunal seriously. It was a joke before it was formed by an Israeli/US decision. This is the biggest gift to Hizbullah for the new year. Expect a press conference by Nasrallah this week.

    #Liban #TSL

    • قناة الجديد : الموقع الرسمي - حقيقة "ليكس" الجديد: لقاء الحريري، الحسن، ليمان، ومحمد زهير الصديق
      http://www.aljadeed.tv/wsg/newsdetails.aspx?ln=4918

      قناة الجديد تكشف في تقرير خاص جلسة حوار بين رئيس الحكومة المستقيلة سعد الحريري ورئيس جهاز شعبة المعلومات وسام الحسن ومساعد المحقق الدولي غيرهالد ليمان ضِمن وثائقَ «حقيقة ليكس»، ومن خلال هذه الجلسة المسجلة صوتياً يكشف لماذا الصديق اصبح اقوى من الدولة وكيف استحصل على الحصانة التي مكنته من اتهام سوريا واربعة ضباط ومن تعطيل جلسات مجلس الوزراء وصولا الى هدم الحكومة ووفاقها.

    • Présenté dans ce blog :
      http://qifanabki.com/2011/01/15/saad-al-hariri-caught-on-tape-with-false-witness-muhammad-zuhair-al-siddi

      Well this is embarrassing. Lebanese TV station al-Jadeed has a major scoop tonight: a leaked recording of a meeting between Saad al-Hariri, Information Branch chief Colonel Wissam al-Hassan, STL deputy chief investigator Gerhard Lehmann, and Muhammad Zuhair al-Siddiq. You can watch the entire report below.

      Blog qui s’accroche à l’idée que ça ne va pas trop abîmer l’image de Saad Hariri...

    • Très courte dépêche AFP sur Ynet :
      http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4014006,00.html

      Lebanon’s Hezbollah-affiliated TV station has aired a tape in which caretaker Prime Minister Saad Hariri can be heard allegedly coaching a witness to implicate Syria in the case of the murder of his father, Rafik Hariri. No details were given on the tape’s origins.

    • Mentionné par L’Orient-Le Jour :
      http://www.lorientlejour.com/category/Liban/article/685229/La_chaine_New_TV_diffuse_un_entretien_presume_entre_Hariri_et_Siddiq.

      Selon l’enregistrement, M. Siddiq affirme au Premier ministre « détenir toute la vérité » sur l’assassinat de son père, et que le rapport de l’enquête « devrait inclure le nom de neuf Syriens et quatre Libanais ».
      Surnommé le « témoin roi », cet ancien officier syrien avait affirmé devant la commission d’enquête que l’ancien président libanais Émile Lahoud et le président syrien Bachar el-Assad avaient donné l’ordre d’assassiner Rafic Hariri, devenu opposé à l’hégémonie de Damas, ancienne puissance de tutelle au Liban. Le TSL avait indiqué par la suite que M. Siddiq ne l’intéressait pas.

    • Johsua Landis en parle sur Syria Comment :
      http://www.joshualandis.com/blog/?p=8097

      Al-Jadid TV [New TV] in Lebanon just aired this taped recording of a meeting that took place between Saad al-Hariri, Information Branch chief Colonel Wissam al-Hassan, STL deputy chief investigator Gerhard Lehmann, and Muhammad Zuhair al-Siddiq, one of the false witnesses whose testimony was used by Mehlis to accuse Syria for plotting the murder of Rafiq al-Hariri. It records the four men laying out a plan for how to convince the international community of Syria’s culpability. They all believe Syria to be the instigator of the killing. They agree that they must present the world with an air-tight case and lots of proof. Saddiq explains to Hariri that he tried to warn him of May Shidiyyaq’s attempted assassination two days ahead of time, but claims Hariri refused to answer it. Hariri asks Saddiq why he didn’t text him. Hariri calls Saddiq a “diarrhea mouth” to Mehlis’s lieutenant, but goes on to explain that he should be believed and is trustworthy. This is damaging to the Tribunal and Hariri because it shows how tainted Mehlis’ reports were and how eager the European investigators were to take at face value trumped up evidence. For Hariri, it is damaging because he swore that he had not met with Saddiq or any of the false witnesses.

    • Même le Nahar en a une dépêche :

      TV Station Broadcasts Alleged Conversation Between Hariri, Siddiq - Naharnet Newsdesk
      http://www.naharnet.com/domino/tn/NewsDesk.nsf/getstory?openform&24742291C4E41CACC225781A003308CD

      The TV station said the broadcast was intended to show a link between Hariri and Siddiq, whom March 8 forces describe as a false witness and the international tribunal does not recognize.

      Al-Jadid accused the caretaker premier of “hiding the truth and playing with the bloods of February 14 martyrs” in reference to the bombing that killed the former PM and 22 others.

      The meeting was also attended by former chief investigator Detlev Mehlis’ assistant Gerhard Lehmann and police intelligence chief Col. Wissam al-Hassan, according to the tape.

      In the audiotape, Siddiq told Hariri that the report of U.N. investigators probing his father’s assassination should name six Syrians and four Lebanese.

      [...]

      Al-Jadid did not give details as to how it obtained the audiotape but said that the Special Tribunal for Lebanon had a copy of it.

      New TV (Al Jadeed) a annoncé la diffusion d’un deuxième enregistrement ce soir dimanche.

    • Le bureau d’information de Hariri : la conversation de Siddiq en présence de Lehman a eu lieu à la demande de la commission d’enquête internationale - Politique - iloubnan.info
      http://www.iloubnan.info/politique/actualite/id/54362/titre/Le-bureau-d'information-de-Hariri:-la-conversation-de-Siddiq-en-présence-

      BEYROUTH - Concernant le rapport relatif à l’enregistrement de conversations ayant eu lieu dans le cadre de l’enquête sur l’attentat de Rafik Hariri et diffusé samedi soir par la chaîne de télévision Al-Jadid, le bureau d’information du Premier ministre sortant Saad Hariri a diffusé un communiqué indiquant ce qui suit :

      "La dernière conversation attribuée au président Saad Hariri et au colonel Wissam Hassan avec Mohammad Zouhair Siddiq en présence de l’adjoint du procureur général Gerhard Lehman a eu lieu à la demande de la commission d’enquête internationale qui a organisé cet entretien et chargé Lehman d’y assister. « La conversation a eu lieu mais la chaîne Al-Jadid a émis des paragraphes empreints de provocation médiatique afin de l’extraire de son contexte d’origine. Cette chaîne n’ajoute d’ailleurs aucun élément susceptible d’accélérer ou de retarder le cours de l’enquête », selon le bureau de Hariri.

      La contre-attaque est assez minable :

      « Cet enregistrement attribué à des témoins devant la commission d’enquête internationale est une affaire de renseignement par excellence qui nous pousse à nous poser des questions sur les visées de sa diffusion médiatique. »