publishedmedium:foreign policy magazine

  • Pour Robert Reich il ne se pose aucun problème pour convaincre ses lecteurs, que le comportement du POTUS en vue des événements du 11 et 12 Août à Charlottesville n’est pas à considérer comme un jugement malheureux, mais est évidemment à voir dans une ligne avec des affirmations, lesquelles il a déjà épanchées pendant sa campagne présidentielle.
    D’un autre côté Reich - comme membre de la Partie Démocratique - ne se montre pas capable de se détacher de cette idée fixe d’une Russie méchante, qui aurait eu la finesse de manipulé cette campagne.

    –----------------------------------

    Trump’s unwillingness to denounce hateful violence has been part of his political strategy from the start.

    Robert Reich : Making America Hate Again | 2017-08-14
    http://robertreich.org/post/164181239710

    [...]

    Weeks after he began his campaign by alleging that Mexican immigrants were criminals and rapists, two brothers in Boston beat up and urinated on a 58-year-old homeless Mexican national, subsequently telling police “Donald Trump was right, all these illegals need to be deported.”
    Instead of condemning the brutality, Trump excused it by saying “people who are following me are very passionate. They love this country and they want this country to be great again.”
    During campaign rallies Trump repeatedly excused brutality toward protesters. “You know what they used to do to guys like that when they were in a place like this? They’d be carried out on a stretcher, folks.”
    After white supporters punched and attempted to choke a Black Lives Matter protester, Trump said “maybe he should have been roughed up.”
    Trump was even reluctant to distance himself from David Duke and the Ku Klux Klan. 
    Since becoming president, Trump’s instigations have continued. As Representative Mark Sanford, a Republican from South Carolina, told the Washington Post, “the president has unearthed some demons.”
    In May, Trump congratulated body-slamming businessman Greg Gianforte on his special election win in Montana, making no mention of the victor’s attack on a reporter the night before.
    Weeks ago Trump even tweeted a video clip of himself in a WWE professional wrestling match slamming a CNN avatar to the ground and pounding him with punches and elbows to the head.
    Hateful violence is hardly new to America. But never before has a president licensed it as a political strategy or considered haters part of his political base.
    In his second week as president, Trump called Wayne LaPierre, CEO of the National Rifle Association to the White House.
    Soon thereafter, LaPierre told gun owners they should fear “leftists” and the “national media machine” that were “an enemy utterly dedicated to destroy not just our country, but also Western civilization.”
    Since then the NRA has run ads with the same theme, concluding “the only way we stop this, the only way we save our country and our freedom, is to fight this violence of lies with a clenched fist of truth.”
    It’s almost as if someone had declared a new civil war. But who? And for what purpose?
    One clue came earlier last week in a memo from Rich Higgins, who had been director for strategic planning in Trump’s National Security Council.
    Entitled “POTUS & Political Warfare,” Higgins wrote the seven-page document in May, which was recently leaked to Foreign Policy Magazine.
    In it Higgins charges that a cabal of leftist “deep state” government workers, “globalists,” bankers, adherents to Islamic fundamentalism and establishment Republicans want to impose cultural Marxism in the United States. “Recognizing in candidate Trump an existential threat to cultural Marxist memes that dominate the prevailing cultural narrative, those that benefit recognize the threat he poses and seek his destruction.”
    There you have it. Trump’s goal has never been to promote guns or white supremacy or to fuel attacks on the press and the left. These may be means, but the goal has been to build and fortify his power. And keep him in power even if it’s found that he colluded with Russia to get power.
    Trump and his consigliere Steve Bannon have been quietly encouraging a civil war between Trump’s base of support – mostly white and worried – and everyone who’s not.
    It’s built on economic stresses and racial resentments. It’s fueled by paranoia. And it’s conveyed by Trump’s winks and nods haters, and his deafening silence in the face of their violence.
    A smaller version of the civil war extends even into the White House, where Bannon and his protégés are doing battle with leveler heads.

    [...]

    trouvé ici : https://diasp.eu/posts/5915491

    #vocabulaire #minimisation #rhétorique #Trump #KKK #Ku_Klux_Klan
    #violence #néonazisme #Charlottesville #fundamentalisme #Islam
    #migrations #Mexique
    #Russie

  • Foreign Policy Magazine: It’s Time to Kick Germany Out of the Eurozone - The Pappas Post
    http://www.pappaspost.com/foreign-policy-magazine-its-time-to-kick-germany-out-of-the-eurozone

    In the past year, German politicians have proved far more willing to try boosting demand by raising the minimum wage, cutting the retirement age, and increasing pensions — moves that may work, but risk harming productivity, which is ultimately the source of Germany’s capacity to consume. Perversely, those same politicians refuse to cut taxes or boost public spending, which in 2014 resulted in Germany posting its first balanced federal budget since 1969, a year earlier than planned. To most Germans, any suggestion that they should relax this fiscal discipline smacks of Greek-style profligacy, but there’s another way to think about it. The excess savings are already there; the only question is where to lend it all. Borrowing it domestically to drive a genuine European recovery might be preferable to (once again) throwing it at foreigners to buy things they really can’t afford.

    #Eurozone #Allemagne #Importations

  • Wasalu Muhammad Jaco aka Lupe Fiasco crée la polémique :

    « #FiascoGate: US rapper pulled off stage over inauguration anti-Obama rant »
    http://rt.com/usa/news/rapper-us-obama-fiasco-409

    American rapper Lupe Fiasco was thrown off stage by security guards as he performed a 40-minute anti-Obama song during a pre-inauguration event at a Washington, DC, concert hall Sunday night.

    “Lupe Fiasco just got thrown off stage here at the Hamilton Live after he went on an anti-Obama diatribe mid set,” Josh Rogin, a reporter with Foreign Policy magazine, posted on Twitter.

    During the concert, the singer played a lengthy anti-war song and told the audience he didn’t vote for Barack Obama, according to witnesses. When he was told to move on to the next song, he refused, and “a team of security guards came on stage and told him to go.”

    The incident with Lupe Fiasco, born Wasalu Muhammad Jaco, triggered a storm of comments on Twitter – the hashtag #FiascoGate became popular across the social network.

    The Internet community clashed over what happened, with some asking why “it’s okay for Kanye West to diss George Bush, but it’s wrong for Lupe Fiasco to question Obama war policies.”

    Extrait de sa fiche Wiki :

    Political views

    Fiasco is noted for his anti-establishment views. In an interview with Stephen Colbert on the satirical news show The Colbert Report, Fiasco stated his credo on political philosophy: “You should criticize power even if you agree with it.”[77] In another interview in June 2011 on the CBS program What’s Trending, Fiasco discussed the political content of his music, stating, “My fight against terrorism, to me, the biggest terrorist is Obama and the United States of America. I’m trying to fight the terrorism that’s actually causing the other forms of terrorism. You know, the root cause of terrorism is the stuff the U.S. government allows to happen. The foreign policies that we have in place in different countries that inspire people to become terrorists.”[78] He additionally criticized Obama for his stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.[79] In keeping with his anti-establishment views, Fiasco does not vote in U.S. elections.[77]

    #Lupe_Fiasco #Rap_US #Obama

  • Les arabes haïssent-ils les femmes ? Mona Eltahawy face à la tempête

    Article original en anglais: Why do they hate us? : http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/04/23/why_do_they_hate_us

    La chroniqueuse égypto-américaine Mona Eltahawy a, à nouveau, suscité la controverse en publiant dans le Foreign Policy Magazine de ce 23 avril 2012, un article traitant de la discrimination envers les femmes au Moyen-Orient intitulé ‘Pourquoi nous haïssent-ils ?‘.

    Dont voici la traduction sur Slate.fr : http://www.slate.fr/story/54247/printemps-arabe-haine-femmes

    Eltahawy y affirme que les sociétés arabes sont fondamentalement misogynes et que les incessantes violences envers les femmes “alimentées par un mélange à la fois de culture et de ‘religion” tendent à se généraliser.

    De nombreux journalistes, blogueurs et activistes arabes ont critiqué la manière dont Mona Eltahawy a formulé ses arguments et ont exprimé leur colère face aux images accompagnant l’article - une jeune femme nue, le corps recouvert d’une peinture noire semblable au niqab - arguant que celles-ci constituaient une représentation stéréotypée des femmes arabes.

    Voir différentes réactions :
    http://fr.globalvoicesonline.org/2012/04/29/106756

    Cet article commence à avoir un écho en France, des réactions commencent à poindre... :
    Mona El Tahawy et le Monde Arabe imaginaire

    http://www.foulexpress.com/2012/05/mona-el-tahawy-et-le-monde-arabe-imaginaire

    • Eltahawy’s description—and it is merely a description, not an analysis—disappoints many Arab, Muslim, and non-Western feminists because it thrives on cultural essentialism: They, Arab men, hate us because this is how our culture is, because something is inherently wrong about the culture itself that they have created. Instead of moving the discussion beyond essentialist claims—the sort that Christian fundamentalists, racist Islamophobes, neoconservatives, LePen supporters in France, and Rick Santorum, to name a few propagate—Eltahawy as a native speaker and herself a victim of Arab misogyny, provides fodder for such misconstrued claims that Arab feminists have been desperately trying to deconstruct. The disappointment lies not in the fact that Eltahawy made us look bad in public—as she claimed in a television appearance on MSNBC’s Melissa Harris-Perry show—but in the failure to perform the very task her article title promised: Providing an answer. The result is a tautological piece, that starts with the conclusion and misidentifies the who and the what of that hate.

      http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/5355/politics-at-the-tip-of-the-clitoris_why-in-fact-do