publishedmedium:haaretz

  • Israël/ Palestine
    Le Conseil National de Sécurité américain récuse les allégations avancées par Haaretz (édition du 24 avril 2013) selon lesquelles Washington serait disposé à inviter à un sommet Netanyahou, Abbas et le roi Abdallah de Jordanie pour relancer les négociations israélo-palestiniennes. L’auteur de l’article maintient que ses informations sont puisées à la bonne source.

    U.S. denies plan to convene 4-way Mideast summit in June
    Despite denials, well-placed U.S. sources insist that a four-way summit heralding the launch of renewed talks between Israel and the Palestinians had been discussed with Mideast leaders, foreign ministers.

    By Chemi Shalev | Apr.25, 2013 | Haaretz

    http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/u-s-denies-plan-to-convene-4-way-mideast-summit-in-june-1.517668

    The Obama administration Thursday denied a Haaretz report about plans to convene a four way Middle East peace summit in which President Barack Obama, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Jordan’s King Abdullah will participate.

    Bernadette Meehan, National Security Council Spokesperson: said “We have the seen the media reports of a planned Middle East Peace summit in Washington. These reports are not true. We remain committed to working with the Israelis and the Palestinians to achieve a lasting peace through direct negotiations.”

    Acting Deputy Spokesperson Patrick Ventrell also denied the report, saying that the U.S. Administration is expecting to hold talks with an Arab League delegation that will visit Washington on April 29.

    Despite the denials, however, well-placed American sources insisted Thursday that a four-way summit that would herald the launch of renewed talks between Israel and the Palestinians had been discussed with Mideast leaders and foreign ministers. One diplomatic source told Haaretz that the sides had been encouraged to “come up with ideas” that would enable the summit to convene. (…)


  • A blatantly illegal mission for the army
    Protéger les colonies illégales, une mission illégale

    Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/a-blatantly-illegal-mission-for-the-army-1.513133

    Sometimes it seems there’s no limit to the corruption tainting the Israel Defense Forces’ operations in the settlements.

    Haaretz’s Chaim Levinson reported on Tuesday that during Passover a group of reservists was assigned to guard homes at an illegal outpost known as “Booster,” adjacent to the settlement of Negohot. Not only has a demolition order been issued against all the temporary structures at the site, but during Passover the homes were empty anyway because their occupants had gone to their parents’ for the holiday. Thus the soldiers found themselves guarding illegal property instead of celebrating the holiday at home.


  • Aged eight, wearing a Mickey Mouse sweatshirt, and placed in Israeli custody - Twilight Zone - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
    http://www.haaretz.com/weekend/twilight-zone/aged-eight-wearing-a-mickey-mouse-sweatshirt-and-placed-in-israeli-custody.

    We couldn’t help ourselves: The sight of the young, newly released detainee drove us into a paroxysm of laughter.

    The IDF must stop arresting children - Opinion - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
    http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/the-idf-must-stop-arresting-children.premium-1.512697

    The unbearable ease with which the IDF, police and Border Police arrest small children shows that Israel is blatantly flouting both UNICEF’s report and its own laws.


    • Pas de plainte, circonstances « pas claires » pour le YNet, mais suffisamment de temps pour que faire des déclarations aux médias :

      Since horowitz refused to file a complaint with local police, the circumstances surrounding the attack remain unclear.

      […]

      Horowitz refused medical care and did not file a complaint with local police. “I didn’t want to spend all night at the (police) station. I don’t know if the attack was racially motivated , but wither way it’s annoying: In Israel I was criticized by the right and in France the Arabs beat me up.”

      Je vois à l’instant qu’Electronic Ali se pose des questions : Did Israeli filmmaker Yariv Horowitz fabricate story of brutal attack by “Arab youths” in France ?
      http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/did-israeli-filmmaker-yariv-horowitz-fabricate-story-brutal-atta

      I spoke with Karine Paravisini, the police commissioner of Aubagne by telephone today.

      Paravisini confirmed that police and emergency medical services (pompiers) had been called to attend the scene of an incident. She did not know who had called them.

      Paravisini said that when police arrived on the scene Mr. Horowitz appeared to be fine and refused medical assistance. “He was not unconscious, and if he had been he would have been taken to the hospital. We would not leave a person who was seriously injured in the street just like that.”

      Paravisini said that Horowitz refused to make a police report and police had no reports from any third parties or witnesses regarding an attack and no suspects since no complaint had been made.

    • Festival International du Film d’Aubagne
      il y a 4 heures
      http://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=10151516338493360&id=139115833359

      Mais il convient de rétablir certaines vérités :
      1 - Ce ne sont pas des hommes qui ont commis l’agression mais un jeune mineur qui était avec d’autres jeunes de son âge.
      2 - Celui-ci n’était pas arabe.
      3 - Les événements qui ont déclenché le coup (un seul coup) n’ont rien à voir avec une agression raciste.
      4 - Après avoir été aidé par les organisateurs du festival, Yariv Horowitz a été vu par les pompiers qui n’ont relevés qu’une blessure mineure. Ils lui ont proposé d’aller voir la police. Le réalisateur a refusé. Sa blessure étant minime il n’a pas souhaité non plus aller à l’hôpital.
      5 - Loin du lynchage, Yariv Horowitz a repris le cours du festival dès le lendemain et a participé aux différents événements jusqu’à la fin du festival.
      6 - Il est monté sur scène le soir de la remise des récompenses avec le sourire pour recevoir son prix : mention spéciale du jury pour la qualité de sa mise en scène.

    • L’agression du cinéaste israélien fait débat | La Provence
      http://www.laprovence.com/actu/faits-divers-en-direct/2287599/lagression-du-cineaste-israelien-fait-debat-sur-le-web.html

      Yariv Horowitz, cinéaste israélien a été agressé le 21 mars à Aubagne lors de la présentation de son long-métrage Rock The Casbah au festival du film d’Aubagne, rapporte le site "JewPop". Depuis informations et désinformations circulent sur internet, notamment sur des sites communautaires. « Jewpop » constate « le silence des médias français sur l’agression ». Desinfos.com pousse plus loin en affirmant que le cinéaste a été « gravement lynché après la projection de son film ». D’autre part, de nombreuses rumeurs circulent sur les éventuels agresseurs. 

      Gaëlle Rodeville, déléguée générale du Festival international du film d’Aubagne, souhaite faire une mise au point face à l’ampleur que prend la désinformation autour de l’agression du cinéaste israélien, Yariv Horowitz, présent sur le festival avec son film « Rock the Casbah » en compétition internationale. 

      "Nous étions sur place lors de l’agression du réalisateur Yariv Horowitz le jeudi 21 mars à 22h30. Il ne nous appartient pas de juger à qui revient la faute et aucune agression n’est excusable. Mais il convient de rétablir certaines vérités : ce ne sont pas des hommes qui ont commis l’agression mais un jeune mineur qui était avec d’autres jeunes de son âge ; pour nous, celui-ci n’était pas arabe. 3 - Les événements qui ont déclenché le coup (un seul coup) n’ont rien à voir avec une agression raciste, ni un lynchage...

      Désinformation à Aubagne : le CRIF pris la main dans le sac
      http://www.europalestine.com/spip.php?article8201

      Email adressé par l’attaché de presse du Festival à Electronic Intifada :

      « Aubagne, le 30 mars 2013

      "...."

      "Nos déclarations sont étayées par des témoins et par des vidéos. Nous demandons au réalisateur Yariv Horowitz de retirer les déclarations qu’il a faites au journal israélien Haaretz, et de faire preuve de retenue à propos d’allégations dont le seul effet est de renforcer le communautarisme. Nous appelons à la raison, et demandons aux journalistes d’exercer leur métier de manière professionnelle, sans alimenter la haine avec des informations partiales et non vérifiées ».

    • His lies about brutal “Arab” attack in France exposed, Israeli director Yariv Horowitz concocts new ones- http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/ali-abunimah/his-lies-about-brutal-arab-attack-france-exposed-israeli-directo

      Instead of taking responsibility for blaming “Arab” youths as he did unambiguously and repeatedly, Horowitz now blames an “Arab” man who allegedly approached him the next day for attributing the attack to Arab youths! For Horowitz, who apparently doesn’t check his earlier claims before issuing new contradictory ones, it seems Arabs are responsible for everything!

    • De la plume même de Richard Abitbol, président de la « Ligue de défense juive »
      AGRESSION de Yariv Horowitz : EXAGERATION ou MENSONGE VOLONTAIRE ? | Ligue de Defense Juive
      http://www.liguedefensejuive.com/agression-de-yariv-horowitz-exageration-ou-mensonge-volontaire

      Afin de faire du buzz on fait croire à une agression antiisraélienne ou antisemite.

      Depuis quelque temps, nous assistons à une recrudescence de dénonciations de faux actes antisémites : cela est indécent et coupable.
      Indécent, car au vu de la recrudescence et de la montée en puissance des actes antisémites avérés, nul besoin est d’en rajouter ; indécent, vis-à-vis des véritables victimes de l’antisémitisme ; indécent, car cela décrédibilise notre action auprès de la presse et des autorités ; enfin, indécent vis-à-vis de l’image de notre communauté.
      Coupable car la volonté de « tirer le premier » de certaines institutions ne tient absolument pas compte de l’intérêt communautaire mais de celui de « paraître » ; coupable, car ces réactions sont motivées par une volonté de communication interne, bien plus que de celle de défendre notre communauté ; coupable, car ces fausses déclarations sont immédiatement décortiquées par nos ennemis pour jeter le doute sur la multitude d’actes antisémites qui eux sont réels !!!
      Nous nous souvenons tous de la triste affaire du R.E.R D, cette fausse alerte sur un acte antisémite qui n’en était pas un, et qui a causé un tort profond à la lutte contre l’antisémitisme en France. Déjà alors, le B.N.V.C.A avait mis en garde sur une hyper-réactivité sans avoir contrôlé les faits.
      Puis nous avons eu « l’agression présumée » d’un garçon de 12 ans dans le métro parisien alors qu’il attendait le bus qui devait l’emmener à l’école. Or, après enquête, le B.N.V.C.A a pu affirmer que cette agression n’avait jamais eu lieu.
      Ensuite, il y eut l’annonce d’une agression qui aurait eu lieu vendredi 2 novembre à Nice. Il s’agissait d’un différend de voisinage qui aurait dérapé.
      Nous avons eu également la dénonciation « d’une agression antisémite » qui aurait été commise à Sarcelles contre un membre de la communauté juive, et rapportée dans Le Parisien du 2/11/12, il s’agissait en fait d’un bizutage lié à Haloween.
      De cette communication incontrôlée, nous venons, à nouveau, d’en faire les frais cette semaine avec « l’agression présumée » d’un cinéaste israélien à Aubagne.

      Après enquête du B.N.V.C.A, il semble que cette histoire n’ait rien à voir avec un quelconque acte antisémite ou antisioniste. D’ailleurs, le film de Yariv Horowitz est plutôt pro-palestinien.
      Après enquête, il apparaît que la police et les services médicaux ont bien été appelés sur les lieux de « l’incident », sans authentification de l’appel, mais que lorsque ceux-ci sont arrivés sur les lieux Monsieur Horowitz était en forme et a refusé toute assistance médicale.
      Selon le Commissariat, « Il n’était pas inconscient, et s’il l’avait été, il aurait été emmené à l’hôpital. Nous n’aurions jamais laissé une personne qui aurait été grièvement blessée dans la rue comme ça. ».
      La Police confirme que Monsieur Horowitz a refusé de déposer plainte ou d’établir un rapport de police, et qu’aucun témoin n’est venu au commissariat pour rapporter un tel incident.
      Il semble que le déroulé de l’histoire soit le suivant : Jeudi dernier ( et non le 28) Yariv Horowitz présente son film (pro-palestinien) qui est accueilli très chaleureusement par le public du festival (il a d’ailleurs eu le prix spécial du jury).
      Il a eu une altercation avec des jeunes d’Aubagne (jeunes environs 15-17 ans) au sujet d’un mauvais geste, qui n’a rien à voir avec le fait qu’il soit réalisateur, ni même israélien ! L’incident s’est produit sans aucun rapport avec la projection contrairement à ce qui a été rapporté ; et que ces incidents n’ont eu aucun caractère de gravité (comme décrits plus haut). Et d’ailleurs, le lendemain, le jeune cinéaste faisait la fête avec l’équipe du festival avant de prendre l’avion et de rentrer tranquillement chez lui en Israël.
      Au vu de tout ceci, la dénonciation, par certaines institutions communautaires, d’un « lynchage antisémite » sur ce jeune cinéaste et dire qu’il aurait été « agressé et battu par un groupe d’individus qui l’ont projeté à terre et lui ont donné des coups de pieds, ce vendredi 29 Mars 2013, juste après la projection de son film… Et qu’après avoir perdu connaissance, il a été soigné sur les lieux. » sans avoir pris la peine de vérifier les faits relève de l’inconscience coupable !
      Il est clair que cette information a été « repiquée » d’un media internet et reprise sans aucun contrôle alors que l’incongruité de la date aurait du suffire pour insuffler le doute ( le Festival s’étant terminé le 23 Mars !) ; d’autant plus que la date mentionnée est différente suivant les différents medias qui ont relaté le présumé incident !!!

      La Confédération des Juifs de France et Amis d’Israël rappelle solennellement que l’information concernant les agressions antisémites est trop sensible pour être dévoyée.
      Nous appelons ceux qui sont en charge de cette veille à plus de professionnalisme, pour notre part nous ne pouvons qu’être satisfaits de la qualité des informations communiquées par le B.N.V.C.A qui se sont toujours avérées exactes comme dans les affaires ci-dessus citées.
      Dans ce contexte, il est important que les responsables communautaires ne se précipitent pas à diffuser des informations erronnées qui inquiéteraient inutilement une communauté déjà durement éprouvée.
      La situation est suffisamment grave pour ne pas être dévoyée par de fausses alertes .
      Pour notre part, nous prenons toutes les mesures nécessaires afin que toutes les informations qui nous parviennent soient minutieusement vérifiées, il y va de la crédibilité de notre lutte contre l’antisémitisme.
      Nous espérons vivement que ces dérapages ne se reproduiront plus à l’avenir, il y va de la crédibilité de notre communauté !

      Richard C. ABITBOL
      Président


  • Obama a-t-il réussi son opération de charme en Israël ? Un consensus semble se dégager sur une attaque contre l’Iran si les tractations diplomatiques échouent. Bluff ou réalité ? Cet article semble indiquer que c’est du sérieux mais on a du mal à y croire, et surtout à penser qu’une attaque contre des sites nucléaires iraniens pourrait être efficace et ne serait pas sans risques graves pour Israël.

    Israel’s defense, political establishments understand Obama’s not bluffing on Iran - Obama visits Israel Israel News | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/obama-visits-israel/israel-s-defense-political-establishments-understand-obama-s-not-bluffing-on-iran.premium-1.511353/israel-s-defense-political-establishments-understand-obama-s-not-bluffing-o

    He has warmed hearts here and gained trust, making up for a sour first impression left during his previous term as president. But despite all the gains, Obama still has to convince Netanyahu on a timetable for attacking Iran, as well as on issues of the West Bank and settlements.

    Both the defense and the political establishments in Israel believe U.S. President Barack Obama when he promises he will prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, even by use of force. Obama is now perceived here as a tough leader who doesn’t get queasy when it comes to taking tough measures. In spite of mounting criticism hurled at him with regard to human rights infringements, he is relentless in using unmanned drones to eliminate enemies of the U.S.

    Leaders such as these, who prefer issuing operational orders over considering the Geneva Convention, are beloved by those who shape Israel’s defense policies. Clearly, they would love to take part in the White House’s forum on operations and strike missions, and would gladly welcome the president to similar forums at Defense Ministry headquarters in Tel Aviv.

    In the U.S. military preparations are now underway for a possible strike against Iran, and this has proved to people here that Obama is reliable. In Israel, the details of the plans against Iran are known. Senior officials say that Obama shares their assessment that a nuclear Iran will lead to an overturn in the balance of power in the region, one that cannot be tolerated. Such a development would pose real threats to vital American interests. Obama, therefore, is preparing a military option while all the while striving for diplomatic negotiations with the Iranians.

    But the U.S. and Israel don’t agree on everything. The primary sticking point is on the timetable, based on the discrepancies in the two nations’ military capabilities, as well as their vulnerability. The window of opportunity in which Israel can do significant damage to Iran is closing – if it isn’t shut already. The Americans have vastly superior means and can operate for longer periods. Obama, therefore, is in no hurry and wants to fully exploit diplomatic channels first.

    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, on the other hand, is concerned that Israel will stall so long that the opportunity will be missed, and at that point circumstances could change and Obama might no longer be able or willing to deliver on his promises. This is the core of their disagreement, which was evident in Obama’s public appearances while in Israel. Israel’s safety margins are considerably narrower, and it takes a lot of hugs and soothing remarks to keep the country quiet while Obama handles things.

    Obama’s visit to Israel erased the bad impression he left here during his first term. His supportive speeches are similar to those made in the past by the greatest friends of Israel in Washington: Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.

    Obama has impressive rhetorical skills and is able to charm audiences, as he amply demonstrated on his visit. At the official state dinner at President Shimon Peres’ residence, Obama was relaxed, full of humor, easily speaking without the teleprompter used in his official speeches. This was not the sour-faced president, sticking to prepared talking points, who met Netanyahu in the Oval Office on earlier occasions.

    One can assume that the public warmth Obama exhibited toward “my friend Bibi” was also evident behind closed doors. Both of these men understand politics and know that the election campaigns are behind them, requiring them to work together from now on. Getting closer on a personal basis makes the relationship easier, as does the increased understanding over Iran.

    But this doesn’t resolve their fundamental dispute over the West Bank, the occupation or the settlements. Netanyahu, according to close associates, is angry with the settlers who rejected him and supported his rival Naftali Bennett. It is doubtful whether this will make him embrace Obama’s call for peace, liberty and justice for the Palestinians. This is why the president appealed directly to the Israeli public, calling on it to bring about political change from below.



  • A LIRE ABSOLUMENT, ce très bon papier d’Amira Hass sur l’Autorité palestinienne et les critiques qu’elle suscite au sein de son peuple.

    Palestinian-American : A new strategy is needed for Palestinian advocacy in U.S. - Obama visits Israel Israel News | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/obama-visits-israel/palestinian-american-a-new-strategy-is-needed-for-palestinian-advocacy-in-u-s.premium-1.511011/palestinian-american-a-new-strategy-is-needed-for-palestinian-advocacy-in-u

    On Thursday morning, about an hour before U.S. President Barack Obama began his very short visit in Ramallah, there were plans to stage a demonstration in the part of the city that had not been sealed hermetically to vehicular and pedestrian traffic as part of the intensive security arrangements. In light of these arrangements, it was also decided there would be no school and that various institutions and offices in Ramallah and al Bireh would remain closed.

    The demonstration was initiated by the Palestinian Nationalist and Islamic Forces, an abbreviated name for the organizations in the Palestinian Liberation Organization (including Fatah) and outside it, which represents a wall-to-wall coalition of activists who hope to attract rank and file citizens as well.

    This was a permitted demonstration - the Palestinian leadership wanted it to take place so Obama would understand that it’s the public who is pressuring them not to return to sterile negotiations without so much as a halt in Israeli settlement construction. At least some of the thousands of Palestinians with American citizenship who live in the West Bank were expected to participate.

    Sam Bahour, a business consultant, was born in the United States and came back to live in his father’s home town, al Bireh, about 20 years ago. Without being identified with a specific political organization, he is outspoken and very involved in public life, both politically and economically. He said he has no expectations of the visit by the president he elected (for internal American reasons, not Palestinian ones).

    There is almost nobody who still thinks that the United States can be a fair mediator. In Bahour’s opinion, the only group excited about the visit is the narrow Palestinian leadership (Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas and about 10 of his associates).

    “At best he’ll prop up the PA for a couple more years by showing that they are state-like,” Bahour said. “This is, I think, part of the U.S. agenda for meeting with the PA.  I don’t have much faith that it can result in anything other than giving the PA some credibility that a U.S. president has approached them and allowed them to sustain themselves longer, when all the facts on the ground and all the economic indicators show that the PA is basically  in a collapse mode.”

    In his opinion, the PLO leadership and later the PA failed for decades to read the political map in the United States.

    "The PA leadership views the U.S. presidents like they view presidents of the Arab world: that the president is everything. In the United States, the president is not everything, but rather one component of a very complicated political system. The PA leadership has never really invested proper thought in the United States to be able to understand the influence of that complicated system. The leadership thinks that all politics in the United States happens in Washington, whereas we know that Washington is reflecting the pressures that constituencies on the ground in various communities put on their representatives.

    “The PLO has always appointed a weak representative in the United States because it thinks that for direct contact with the White House, it doesn’t need any kind of on-the-ground apparatus or organization. Someone who is strong, [they think] he could influence a power base that will disrupt this connection between the White House and the Muqata [PA headquarters]. The reality is just the opposite. As we learn from AIPAC [America’s pro-Israel lobby], to influence Washington we have to do hard work on the ground in all 50 states.”

    This approach is particularly necessary on the Palestinian issue, says Bahour, because instead of being a foreign policy issue, it is hijacked by Congress.

    “Any administration, Republican or Democratic, any president, doesn’t have the leverage or leeway that they should have on a foreign relations issue. This issue in the United States is a domestic issue. I think it only applies to us - any other foreign affairs issue is a foreign affairs issue, where the administration has its leeway.  The arms industry is probably the body behind hijacking the Congress more than anybody else. Maybe equal to AIPAC. [We do not need to] compete with AIPAC , we should be able to enter the minorities community, the churches, the Arab-Americans, the education system. That is a powerful base to start to influence congressmen at the local level. The average American, if presented with the facts of this conflict, has no alternative but to be supportive of the Palestinians.”


  • Obama reassures Israel, while taking a step back from the Middle East - Obama visits Israel Israel News | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/obama-visits-israel/obama-reassures-israel-while-taking-a-step-back-from-the-middle-east.premium-1.510888/obama-reassures-israel-while-taking-a-step-back-from-the-middle-east.premiu

    The region is still important to the United States, but less so than it was a decade or two ago; meanwhile, Israel’s dependence on the U.S. continues to grow.

    The visit comes at a time when the United States is withdrawing from its deep involvement in the Middle East, amid the growing fear of Israel and other regional allies that America will abandon them to radical Islamic forces.

    America entered the region with all its might, as its dependence on oil imports increased. But following the development of new oil and natural gas production methods in North America, the United States is gradually freeing itself of reliance on external energy sources.

    In a few years it will become an oil exporter. The Middle East is still important, but it is less vital than it was a decade or two ago.

    America has tired of the wars in the Middle East that consumed its resources and robbed its attention in the past decade, without resulting in a decisive victory. Obama has already pulled the U.S. Army out of Iraq, and will take it out of Afghanistan this term. The old regional order, with its reliance on secular military dictatorships and pro-American monarchies, has collapsed under the revolutions of the Arab Spring and the strengthening of the region’s Islamic movements.

    The United States has discovered it cannot control these upheavals, and it doesn’t want to get involved in civil wars like the one in Syria. It prefers to stand by and see who wins.

    Under these circumstances, pressure on Israel will increase. Until now, Israel has benefited from American safeguards in the region that have bolstered its deterrence capability, helped to safeguard the peace accords with Egypt and Jordan, and protected it from distant regional powers like Iran and Iraq. And when Israel is worried, or when it feels that its security concerns are not being given the attention they deserve in Washington, it has a tendency to take risks and use military force to perpetuate the strategic status quo.

    Obama is projecting very different images domestically and overseas: He is trying to draw his country inward while telling his allies in the Middle East that, despite what they may be witnessing, the United States is just as committed to them as ever.

    This attitude is reminiscent of Richard Nixon. In 1969 Nixon laid out the American foreign policy strategy that came to be known as the Guam Doctrine or the Nixon Doctrine, which made it clear that Washington would no longer undertake the defense of the free nations of the world. That was the first step toward an eventual American withdrawal from Vietnam, and Nixon, who had to sell the idea to his allies in Asia, assured them that everything would be fine.

    The best way for Israel to ensure that the Americans remain committed is to threaten some unilateral action that would drag in the United States. That’s exactly what Netanyahu did Wednesday in his public appearances with Obama. He kept on talking about Israel’s right to defend itself. In rough translation from diplo-speak, that means, “If you don’t take action to get Iran to thwart its nuclear project, we will be forced to act alone − and you’ll suffer the consequences as much as we will.”


  • IDF complains over Bar Refaeli’s involvement in Israeli hasbara campaign -

    Haaretz

    http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/idf-complains-over-bar-refaeli-s-involvement-in-israeli-hasbara-campaign.pr

    The Israeli Defense Forces criticized a public relations campaign launched by the Foreign Ministry to boost Israel’s image around the world because it starred Israeli model Bar Refaeli, Channel 2 news reported Sunday.

    The report stated that the IDF spokesman sent an official letter to the Foreign Ministry arguing that by using Refaeli, who didn’t complete her military service, the Foreign Ministry was sending a “message of forgiveness and turns a blind eye towards people that chose to enlist.”

    “In recent years, the IDF has been trying a verity of methods to improve the value of military service and to fight draft evasion, in order to preserve the moral dimension whereby the IDF is the people’s army,” Channel two quoted the letter.


  • Days before Obama visit, NYT publishes pro-Palestinian manifesto

    Haaretz

    /Users/alain/Desktop/1340782202.jpg

    http://www.haaretz.com/blogs/west-of-eden/days-before-obama-visit-nyt-publishes-pro-palestinian-manifesto.premium-1.5

    Days before U.S. President Barack Obama’s visit to Israel, the New York Times magazine has published an unusually pro-Palestinian cover story entitled “If There is a Third Intifada, We Want to be the Ones who Started It.”

    The 7000 word article, written by author and freelance journalist Ben Ehrenreich, depicts the struggle of the Tamimi family in the West Bank village of Nebi Saleh to regain access to a spring which has been taken over by the nearby settlement of Halamish. Ehrenreich spent three weeks living in the home of Bassem Tamimi, one of the prominent leaders of the weekly protests that have drawn international media attention and which are routinely dispersed by the IDF.


  • On y arrive petit à petit...
    New government to promote contentious bill altering balance between Israel’s Jewish and democratic identities Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/new-government-to-promote-contentious-bill-altering-balance-between-israel-

    The Likud and Habayit Hayehudi parties agreed in their coalition agreement to advance a controversial Basic Law subverting Israel’s democratic identity to its identity as the state of the Jewish people.


  • Va-t-on revenir aux heures noires de l’ère Sharon ?
    Une nouvelle député de Habayit Hayehudi habitant Hebron est présentée comme une « militante des droits de l’homme » sur Wikipedia !! « La Haute cour de justice considère les Arabes de Judée et Samarie comme une population protégée, contrairement aux Juifs », affirme-t-elle.

    On Hebrew Wikipedia, pro-settler figure and new Habayit Hayehudi MK Orit Strock is a human rights activist Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/on-hebrew-wikipedia-pro-settler-figure-and-new-habayit-hayehudi-mk-orit-str

    The editors of the Hebrew edition of Wikipedia have decided to describe the pre-legislative career of freshman Knesset member Orit Strock (Habyit Hayehudi) as “human rights activist” on her article page.

    The decision, which was reported in the Maariv Hebrew daily, followed extensive discussion on the article’s talk page among the entry’s editors. In the February 23 vote, 28 editors were for and 23 were against the decision.

    Strock, 52, a leading figure in Hebron’s Jewish community, is the founding chairwoman of the Human Rights Organization of Judea and Samaria and is the head of the political-legal Department of the Jewish Community of Chevron. Strock has 11 children and 12 grandchildren.

    The characterization of Strock as a human rights activist set off a long-running controversy on the talk page of her Hebrew Wikipedia entry, mainly around whether the description was accurate in light of the fact that her organization focuses exclusively on the rights of Jewish settlers in the West Bank.

    Defenders of the decision cited Strock’s “enviable success” in addressing the issue of police brutality.

    Opponents argued, among other things, that anyone who supported the use of aggressive force could not be called a human rights activist.

    This argument was based on comments by a former head of the Civil Administration in the West Bank, Brig. Gen. Dov Zedaka, to “Makor,” Channel 10 television’s investigative program, according to which Strock had criticized an Israel Defense Forces battalion operating in Hebron for being insufficiently tough toward Palestinians.

    Zedaka said that in an evaluation of the performance of the IDF’s Hebron Brigade Struk said since only a small number of complaints were filed against the battalion by Palestinians, “presumably the battalion is acting with too much humanitarianism,” and added, “When the complaints from the Palestinian side about aggressiveness are more numerous it is a sign that the battalion is very good, it is active and it imposes order.”

    Responding to questions from one of the Wikipedia editors in the course of the debate over her page, Strock argued that her quote was misused, explaining: “We are often required to strike a balance among various contradictory human rights and have no choice but to violate certain rights in order to protect ones, when the right to living in security overrides other constitutional rights,” she said, adding that in rulings Israel’s High Court of Justice has upheld this approach.

    Strock said she disagreed with the assumption of some of the editors that the human rights situation of Jews in the West Bank was better than that of Palestinians.

    “The Arabs in Judea and Samaria are defined by the High Court of Justice as a protected population, unlike the Jews” living there, Strock said.

    “The rights of the protected population are infringed only for essential security needs, and with strict proportionality,” Strock said, adding, “The basic rights of the Jewish residents of Judea and Samaria are systematically violated and trampled on by the authorities.”

    Strock also rejected the claim that she only acts to defend the rights of settlers. She said she worked to defend the rights of people who were neglected by other human rights organizations, such as settlers but also “Arabs who were sentenced to death solely because they were suspected of selling land to Jews.”

    The spokeswoman of the Wikimedia Foundation, which operates the online encyclopedia, told Haaretz that the community decides on its content democratically and the foundation does not interfere in decisions about content.


  • Are young American liberal Jews ashamed of Israel?

    Haaretz

    http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/features/are-young-american-liberal-jews-ashamed-of-israel-1.293443

    Peter Beinart is a Jewish-American lecturer, author and journalist whose essay “The Failure of the American Jewish establishment,” published in the June issue of the New York Review of Books, has raised a storm among the American Jewish establishment. In the article, Beinart accuses that establishment of sacrificing its liberal values in favor of support for Israel at any price, a strategy that his led it to lose the support of the younger generation of liberal American Jews.


  • Le journal Haaretz publie les résultats de l’étude « National Resilience » dirigée par le Prof. Gabriel Ben-Dor, directeur du National Security Studies Center de l’Université de Haïfa. Les questions posées portent l’état d’esprit de la population israélienne (arabe et juive) : optimisme, militantisme, foi dans les institutions gouvernementale et crainte d’une attaque contre Israël.

    Israeli Arabs more afraid than Jews of enemy attack, poll finds Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/israeli-arabs-more-afraid-than-jews-of-enemy-attack-poll-finds.premium-1.50

    Israeli Arabs are more afraid than the Jewish public of being attacked by an enemy state, according to the annual “National Resilience” survey.

    Israel’s Jewish population, meanwhile, is more calm than ever about the possibility of an attack by an enemy country, the survey revealed, reporting an all-time low on its so-called “fear index.” This is a continuation of a previous trend that began in 2006. The Jewish population’s fear of terror is also reportedly at an all-time low.

    The annual “National Resilience” survey has been conducted since 2000. Most recently it was conducted in November during Operation Pillar of Defense, polling 2,000 respondents, including 400 Arabs. Questions covered topics such as optimism, militancy, faith in government institutions, and fear regarding a possible attack.

    The survey was led by Prof. Gabriel Ben-Dor, director of Haifa University’s National Security Studies Center. The results are being published for the first time here in Haaretz.

    Arab respondents are not only more afraid of an attack by an enemy state than are Jews, according to the survey, they’re becoming more afraid all the time. This marks the first time Israeli Arabs were found to be more afraid of such an attack than the Jewish population.

    In fact, the survey noted marked optimism in the Jewish sector - a phenomenon that is backed by other sources as well, said Ben-Dor.

    The public reportedly does not believe Israel is likely to go to war with an Arab country, he said. That’s surprising, in light of the situation in Egypt and Syria, especially given that experts actually say such a military confrontation is possible, said Ben-Dor.

    “People in Israel are simply optimistic. As a result of a hundred years of Zionism that met with difficult challenges, the public’s conceptions are that we have overcome that, and that we will overcome it in the future,” he said.

    Ben-Dor said “it may be that this stems from a lack of willingness or lack of attention to understand the acute problem, and that fits in with the decrease in fear and the increase in optimism.”

    Ben-Dor said there was no obvious reason why Israeli Arabs would be more concerned about an attack than Israeli Jews. “It is possible the Arab population is seriously and intensively following what is happening across the border, and they judge the situation differently,” he said.

    Meanwhile, Druze respondents, who had initially showed a level of patriotism on par with the Jewish population, have over the years become less likely to state that they “love Israel and are proud of it.”

    Since Operation Defensive Shield, the index has shown a steady drop in all populations’ loyalty to the state. But this is the first year that the index revealed significant differences between the Druze and the Jewish populations, said Ben-Dor, who called the trend worrying.

    The index also showed a slight increase in support for military action among both Jewish and Arab respondents. Ben-Dor notes this may be due in part to the fact that the survey was conducted during Operation Pillar of Defense in Gaza.

    Levels of optimism rose slightly among the Jewish population and fell slightly among Arabs.

    Since the previous survey was conducted in October 2011, the percentage of settlers expressing faith in the Knesset grew, keeping in trends with other segments of the Israeli public, Jewish and otherwise. Among settlers, faith in the Knesset grew the most.

    Of the survey’s Jewish respondents, 8 percent were settlers, 10 percent ultra-Orthodox, and 27 percent were new immigrants. The rest were described as “other.”

    Of the minority populations surveyed, 69 percent were Muslims, 15 percent were Druze and the rest were Christians.

    The survey was conducted in advance of the annual Herzliya Conference, hosted by the Interdisciplinary Center at Herzliya, which opens today.


  • Attorney General orders a halt to Israel’s deportation of Eritrean migrants Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/attorney-general-orders-a-halt-to-israel-s-deportation-of-eritrean-migrants

    Under no circumstances will Eritrean nationals in Israeli custody be sent “to any destination outside Israel’s borders” until Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein further clarifies the relevant legal issues, he declared Monday.

    Weinstein, via his deputy, Dina Zilber, sent a letter to this effect to the director of the Interior Ministry’s Population, Immigration and Border Authority, Amnon Ben Ami.

    Weinstein’s order was issued in response to a report Monday on Haaretz’s Hebrew website about the case of an Eritrean migrant whose “voluntary departure” from the country clearly went awry.

    The man, T.H., had been given a choice by the Israeli authorities of “volunteering” to be sent to Uganda or spending three years in jail. But upon arrival in Uganda last Thursday he was refused entry, and the Ugandan authorities put him on a plane to Cairo. He was still being detained at Cairo International Airport Monday.


  • Bus réservés aux Arabes - Bus réservés aux Juifs

    The buses will begin operating Monday morning at the Eyal crossing to take the Palestinians to work in Israel. Transportation Ministry officials are not officially calling them segregated buses, but rather bus lines intended to relieve the distress of the Palestinian workers.

    http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/israel-introduces-palestinian-only-bus-lines-following-complaints-from-jewi


  • Des bus « Only Arabes » dès lundi en Israël | Une Vigie Rue89
    http://www.rue89.com/2013/03/03/des-bus-only-arabes-des-lundi-en-israel-240202

    A partir de lundi, plusieurs lignes de bus reliant la Cisjordanie et la bande de Gaza au centre d’Israël sépareront leurs passagers juifs et arabes. Concrètement, la compagnie Afikim interdira aux Arabes de monter dans certains bus réservés aux Juifs.

    Haaretz relève que les autorités publiques ne parlent pas « officiellement » de ségrégation. En novembre dernier, le quotidien rapportait déjà que le ministre des Transports étudiait un projet similaire, sous la pression de représentants de colonies qui se plaignaient que les Palestiniens empruntant leurs bus représentaient un danger.

    Lire sur Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/israel-introduces-palestinian-only-bus-lines-following-complaints-from-jewi


  • Israel to probe birth control for Ethiopian immigrants | Maan News Agency
    http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=570216

    JERUSALEM (Reuters) — Israel’s Health Ministry has ordered an investigation into whether government employees or health workers prescribed a birth control drug to Ethiopian immigrant women as a way to control the population.

    Haaretz reported on Thursday that a senior official had decided to name a team to look into charges that Ethiopian women were given Depo-Provera shots in an effort to limit the growth of their community in Israel.

    Confirming the report, a ministry spokeswoman replied in a written statement that the ministry would “re-investigate the issue which was examined in the past, to ensure that there was no such directive from any governmental or other Israeli public organization.”

    Suspicions that Ethiopian women had been coerced into receiving Depo-Provera arose in Israeli media a few years ago and again in a recent TV documentary linking the group’s falling birthrate to over-prescription of the injectable contraceptive.

    Israel’s government already said in January it would review the case after a civil rights group accused the health ministry of racism.

    The ministry has already ordered doctors not to renew Depo-Provera prescriptions unless they were convinced patients understood the ramifications, according to a letter from the ministry posted on the group’s website in January.

    Ministry Director-General Roni Gamzu said at the time that the decision did not imply he accepted the allegations by the Association of Civil Rights in Israel.

    In a letter to Gamzu in January, ACRI said "the sweeping use of Depo-Provera among Ethiopian women raises heavy suspicions that we are talking about a deliberate policy to control and monitor fertility among this community.

    “The data ... point to a paternalistic, haughty and racist attitude that limits considerably the freedom of Ethiopian immigrants to choose the birth control that is medically suitable for them.”

    ACRI said statistics from a major Israeli health provider showed it had administered Depo-Provera injections to 5,000 women in 2008, 57 percent of whom were Ethiopian.

    Complaints of discrimination

    Israel has denied any policy to curb the birthrate among the 100,000 Ethiopian Jews who have moved to Israel since chief rabbis determined in 1973 that the community had biblical roots.

    Some Ethiopian Jews have made it into Israel’s parliament and officer ranks in the military, but complaints of discrimination in schooling and housing are common.

    According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which approved Depo-Provera in 1992, its prolonged use may reduce bone density and it should only be used for longer than two years if other birth control methods prove inadequate.

    The documentary, broadcast on Israeli Educational Television, shows a nurse filmed by a hidden camera saying Ethiopian women were given Depo-Provera because they “don’t understand anything” and would forget to take birth control pills.

    Rick Hodes, medical director in Ethiopia for the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee, a non-governmental group that aids immigration to Israel, denied the accusation that women are coerced into receiving the injections before leaving their country for the Jewish state.

    “Injectable drugs have always been the most popular form of birth control in Ethiopia, as well as among women in our program,” Hodes wrote on Twitter.


  • EU consuls recommend imposing sanctions on Israeli settlements

    Haaretz

    http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/eu-consuls-recommend-imposing-sanctions-on-israeli-settlements.premium-1.50

    The European Union’s consuls general in East Jerusalem and Ramallah are recommending economic sanctions against settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

    Among the recommendations made in the nonbinding Heads of Mission report for 2012, which has been obtained by Haaretz, is to “prevent, discourage and raise awareness about problematic implications of financial transactions including foreign direct investments, from within the EU in support of settlement activities, infrastructure and services.”


  • Oxford University Students Union expected to reject Israel boycott motion, Jewish union says

    Haaretz

    http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/oxford-students-expected-to-reject-israel-boycott-motion-jewish-student-uni

    Oxford University Student Union is expected to reject a controversial motion Wednesday evening calling for a boycott of Israeli institutions, goods and produce, according to the U.K.’s Union of Jewish Students.

    Along with the boycott, the motion proposed by student Emily Cousens also calls for the prestigious university’s students union, and for Britain’s National Union of Students, to join the international campaign for boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) against Israel.


  • Jewish youths allegedly attack Arab man in Tel Aviv Israel News |

    Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/jewish-youths-allegedly-attack-arab-man-in-tel-aviv.premium-1.505510

    A 40-year-old Jaffa resident was allegedly attacked early Sunday morning in Tel Aviv by Jewish youths and sustained serious wounds to his head. The attack, which occurred on Herbert Samuel Street around 4:00 A.M. after the victim, Hassan Ausruf, 40, had gone out to work. Ausruf operates a street-cleaning vehicle for contractor cleaning company. When Ausruf stopped his vehicle to fill its water tank, a group of youths assaulted him.

    Ausruf’s wife, Nariman, told Haaretz that a group of about 15 people started to bully and attack Hassan without provocation. “He asked them why they were attacking him and they told him with utmost chutzpah ’because you’re Arab,’” Nariman told Haaretz. “They attacked him with whatever they could get their hands on, bottles and shards of glass and they inflicted serious wounds to his head and in one of his eyes.” She added, “At some point he managed to escape with his entire face covered in blood and reached a friend where he collapsed.”

    #racism #racisme


  • Draconian arrests of Palestinians
    | Haaretz Daily Newspaper

    http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/draconian-arrests-of-palestinians-1.504612

    Comment arrêter sans raisons un Palestinien... Des lois qui en disent long sur « l’état de droit » en Israël

    Fourteen Palestinians freed in the Gilad Shalit deal were arrested by the IDF and Shin Bet security service. Amira Hass reported on Sunday in Haaretz that five of them might serve from 16 to 28 years in prison due to secret or negligible offenses they are accused of committing after their release. This revolving door system is not only inhuman in itself, it also undermines the agreements Israel signed and will make future deals much harder to achieve.

    The arrest of the 14 Palestinians was possible due to the confidential 2009 changes in the military law, ‏decree 1651, which were introduced as the negotiations were being held. These changes allow the IDF and Shin Bet to re-arrest any person released before the end of his original term, following offenses that do not involve terrorist actions, such as traffic violations, participating in illegal demonstrations or illegal entry to Israel − and that based on confidential evidence.


  • Israeli officials ask news media to kill ’embarrassing’ story
    http://www.latimes.com/news/world/worldnow/la-fg-israel-media-embarrassing-story-20130212,0,4628782.story

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office on Tuesday called an emergency meeting of the nation’s top news media editors and owners to ask them to refrain from publishing a story it said would be “very embarrassing to a certain government agency,’’ according to a report in Haaretz newspaper.

    […]

    Early Tuesday, Haaretz published a story about the case on its website with a link to the ABC report, but it was taken down later in the day.  In the afternoon, the paper reported about the prime minister’s request, without mentioning the details of the case.

    Israeli news outlets are required to submit their work to military censors, and according to one report Tuesday, news organizations were cautioned against running the story.


  • Australian Report on Israel’s ’Prisoner X’ Suggests Melbourne Man Was Mossad Agent - NYTimes.com
    http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/12/australian-report-on-israels-prisoner-x-suggests-melbourne-man-was-mossad-agent/?smid=tw-share

    Last Updated, 2:53 p.m. The Australian Broadcasting Corporation reported on Tuesday that a man referred to in Israel as “Prisoner X,” who was jailed and died under mysterious circumstances in 2010, might have been an Australian-born Israeli who worked for Israel’s secret service, the Mossad.

    According to the ABC, an unnamed source “with connections to Israel’s security establishment” claimed that the prisoner — whose detention and suicide at the high-security Ayalon Prison outside Tel Aviv was briefly reported on an Israeli news site in December 2010 despite a gag order — was named Ben Alon. That same month, the network reported, a man from suburban Melbourne, Ben Zygier, who had emigrated to Israel 12 years ago and changed his name to Ben Alon, died in Israel.

    Although the Australian state broadcaster published video and a complete transcript of the 28-minute report online, Israeli news sites removed articles describing the ABC investigation after editors were summoned to an emergency meeting by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office, Reuters reported.

    via Ayman Mohyeldin https://twitter.com/AymanM/status/301421111223152640
    Israel censors its Media over Australian Report on ’Prisoner X’ That Suggests Melbourne Man Was Mossad Agent http://nyti.ms/WHbmIR But why?

    • Prisonnier X, le détenu secret qui embarrasse Israël
      http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/monde/20130212.OBS8645/prisonnier-x-le-detenu-secret-qui-embarrasse-israel.html

      Selon l’enquête réalisée par Trevor Borman pour l’émission Foreign Correspondent, Ben Zieger était issu d’une famille connue de la communauté juive de Melbourne, en Australie. « Monté » en Israël au début des années 2000, alors qu’il était âgé d’une vingtaine d’années, il aurait été recruté par le Mossad. Marié en 2006 à une Israélienne et père de deux enfants, il vivait à Raanana, dans le centre du pays, non loin de l’état-major des services secrets israéliens.

      En avril 2010, il aurait été incarcéré, révèle ABC, à la prison de haute sécurité de Ayalon, près de Tel Aviv, pour un motif inconnu. Mais le régime de confidentialité exceptionnel auquel il était soumis ne se justifierait, selon les experts interrogés par la télévision australienne, que pour trahison au bénéfice d’une puissance étrangère. Il était ainsi incarcérée dans la cellule n°15, construite pour accueillir Yigal Amir, l’assassin d’Itz’hak Rabbin, et véritable prison à l’intérieur de la prison. Surveillé en permanence et « hermétiquement » isolé des autres détenus ainsi que du monde extérieur, il était une énigme, y compris pour ses gardiens qui ignoraient son identité. C’est là qu’il aurait été retrouvé pendu, en décembre 2010, après s’être semble-t-il suicidé. Le 22 décembre 2010, son corps avait été rapatrié en Australie pour être enterré dans le cimetière juif de Melbourne.

    • Polémique en Israël autour du mystérieux suicide d’un détenu australien
      http://www.lorientlejour.com/category/%C3%80+La+Une/article/800625/Polemique_en_Israel_autour_du_mysterieux_suicide_dun_detenu_australie

      En Australie, le chef de la diplomatie Bob Carr a ordonné un examen de l’affaire. Il a affirmé qu’il n’hésiterait pas à demander des explications à Israël « sur ce qui s’est passé » tout en précisant que ses services n’avaient pas été contactés par la famille de Ben Zygier et qu’il n’y avait eu « aucune demande d’assistance consulaire durant la période de sa détention présumée ».

    • Israël : la polémique enfle après la mort mystérieuse d’un prisonnier australien
      par RFI, De notre correspondant à Jérusalem, Michel Paul
      http://www.rfi.fr/moyen-orient/20130214-israel-polemique-enfle-apres-mort-mysterieuse-prisonnier-australien-ben

      Il existe trois façons d’empêcher la publication d’informations en Israël. Deux remontent au mandat britannique, donc bien avant la création même de l’Etat hébreu : la censure militaire et la commission des rédacteurs en chef. La troisième, plus contemporaine, consiste à demander au tribunal l’interdiction pure et simple d’une publication. Ce que l’on appelle en droit anglo-saxon le gag order. Mardi 12 février, ce sont les trois systèmes qui ont été combinés. Le but était d’empêcher de parler du fameux prisonnier X, Ben Zygier. Et c’est l’effet contraire qui a été obtenu.

    • Israël : l’avocat abasourdi quand il a appris la mort du prisonnier X
      http://www.romandie.com/news/n/_Israel_l_avocat_abasourdi_quand_il_a_appris_la_mort_du_prisonnier_X_RP_14 ?

      EILAT (Israël) - L’avocat du mystérieux prisonnier israélo-australien incarcéré pour des raisons de sécurité en Israël en 2010 a déclaré jeudi à l’AFP qu’il avait été abasourdi lorsqu’il avait appris la mort du détenu après l’avoir rencontré la veille de son décès.

      A aucun moment, durant toute la conversation, je n’ai eu l’impression qu’il s’agissait d’une personne qui était sur le point de se supprimer, a témoigné Avigdor Feldman, un avocat spécialiste des droits de l’Homme, dans un entretien avec l’AFP à Eilat (sud d’Israël).

      Je dois dire que j’ai été abasourdi quand j’ai appris (sa mort), a-t-il souligné.

      J’ai rencontré (...) un homme émotionnellement stable, a ajouté l’avocat en précisant que le détenu était alors confronté à un choix cornélien entre négocier une peine —soit un certain nombre d’années en prison— ou bien continuer à se défendre lors d’un procès difficile qui, en cas de culpabilité, aurait pu aboutir aussi à une détention prolongée.

    • Ben Zygier aurait (voulu) révélé la manière dont le Mossad utilise les passeports étrangers (et a pu être suicidé) http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/02/15/183294/ben-zygier-israels-prisoner-x.html

      In late 2009, it appeared that Zygier was on the verge of disclosing secrets about Israel’s use of dual nationals in its spy operations.

      He “may well have been about to blow the whistle, but he never got the chance," Fairfax Media reported, quoting what it described as an Australian security official with knowledge of the case. Fairfax publishes Australia’s two largest newspapers, The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age..

      After a visit to Australia, Zygier was arrested in Israel in February 2010. Australian newspapers have reported that Israel informed Australia’s secret service of the arrest on Feb. 24, 2010, eight days after Dubai police revealed that Mossad agents had used foreign passports – including Australian and British – to enter Dubai and assassinate a leading official of the Hamas movement, Mahmoud al Mabhouh.

      One Israeli official familiar with the case, who spoke to McClatchy on the condition that he not be identified because of the gag order, confirmed that Zygier had intended to reveal sensitive details about the Mossad’s use of foreign passports that would have harmed Israel’s diplomatic relations with Western countries.

      “Its unclear how far he went and therefore what the crimes were that he is being accused of committing,” he said.

      The official version of Zygier’s death – that he hanged himself in his cell on Dec. 15, 2010 – is being greeted with widespread skepticism as details about his life become known.


  • Argentine foreign minister accuses Israel of giving ’ammunition to anti-Semites,’ sources say
    http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/argentine-foreign-minister-accuses-israel-of-giving-ammunition-to-anti-semi

    ...

    Le ministre des Affaires étrangères argentin Hector Timerman a (...) passé un savon à Dorit Shavit l’ambassadrice d’Israël, selon certaines sources.

    L’incident a été provoqué par les tentatives d’Israël d’obtenir des explications sur un accord que l’Argentine et l’Iran ont signé il y a deux semaines environ.

    L’accord a créé une « commission vérité » pour enquêter sur l’attentat de 1994 contre l’AMIA, le centre communautaire juif de Buenos Aires.

    Quand Israël a appris l’accord, le ministère israélien des Affaires étrangères a convoqué l’ambassadeur argentin pour une réprimande, au cours de laquelle l’adjoint du ministère et directeur général pour l’Amérique latine, Itzhak Shoham, s’est opposé à l’accord et demandé des explications.

    Les Argentins étaient furieux, et en réponse, Timerman a convoqué Shavit pour une réprimande le 31 Janvier.

    (...) Shavit était à peine capable de prononcer un mot en réponse, puisqu’il l’a interrompue à plusieurs reprises, selon les sources.

    "Israël n’a pas le droit d’exiger des explications, nous sommes un Etat souverain", lui aurait dit Timerman. "Israël ne parle pas au nom du peuple juif et ne les représente pas. Les Juifs qui voulaient ou veulent vivre en Israël s’y sont déplacés, et ils sont ses citoyens ; ceux qui vivent en Argentine sont des citoyens argentins. L’attaque s’est faite contre l’Argentine, et le désir d’Israël d’être impliqué dans le dossier fournit des munitions aux antisémites qui accusent les Juifs de double loyauté ».

    La convocation de l’ambassadeur argentin, puis sa divulgation aux médias était un comportement inacceptable, aurait-il poursuivi. "L’Argentine n’a pas convoqué l’ambassadeur d’Israël pour obtenir des explications. Si nous le voulions, nous pourrions vous sermonner ici deux fois par mois pour demander des explications sur une opération militaire dans la bande de Gaza ou les constructions dans les colonies. Mais nous ne faisons pas cela, parce que nous ne voulons pas intervenir dans vos décisions souveraines. "

    ...