La position de Forbes est claire : ne nous cite pas, mais on veut bien du trafic crée par ton lien. C’est ainsi que s’imaginent les grandes maisons d’éditions allemandes l’utilisation de textes sur la toile après l’introduction du nouveau #Leistungsschutzrecht.
cf. ►http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leistungsschutzrecht et ►http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droits_voisins_du_droit_d%27auteur_en_France
Erlaubt sind ein Satz und ein Link | Telepolis
►http://www.heise.de/tp/blogs/5/152215
“I’m sorry, but we do not allow anyone to post Forbes content on other websites. Linking back to articles on Forbes.com is allowed at no charge, however.
You may preface your link with up to a single sentence quote from the article, along with the headline and proper credit.
Forbes does not guarantee the permanence or location of articles appearing on our website. The link must open a new window directly to the article on the Forbes website and may not be contained within the host website.
Use of the Forbes logo, excerpting or reprinting articles in whole or part on your website, in emails or newsletters is strictly prohibited without the approval of Forbes Magazine.
This would constitute a reprint or eprint and be subject to fees.
Defamation of the Forbes name in conjunction with use of a link is strictly prohibited. With your acceptance of these general terms you may place your link.”
Maintenant je comprends le déménagement de #seenthis en #Roumanie.