#métaliste sur la mise en place de l’#externalisation des #procédures_d'asile au #Rwanda par l’#Angleterre
–-> 2022
–---
voir aussi la métaliste sur les tentatives de différentes pays européens d’#externalisation non seulement des contrôles frontaliers (►https://seenthis.net/messages/731749), mais aussi de la #procédure_d'asile dans des #pays_tiers :
►https://seenthis.net/messages/900122
#procédure_d'asile #externalisation_de_la_procédure #modèle_australien
Avril 2022 #Boris_Johnson annonce avoir signé un accord avec Kigali pour envoyer des demandeurs d’asile au #Rwanda
Mai 2022 #Priti_Patel ’s Rwanda plan for UK asylum seekers faces its first legal challenge
►https://seenthis.net/messages/961520
juillet 2022: UK Home Office plans second flight to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/966444
Brigitte Espuche : « Le Royaume-Uni se défausse de ses responsabilités en matière d’asile »
Le Royaume-Uni a franchi le pas de la sous-traitance de l’asile en signant un accord avec le Rwanda, en avril dernier, afin d’y envoyer ses demandeurs d’asile. Mais la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme en a décidé autrement, clouant le premier avion au sol mi-juin.
Rwanda asylum deal not legally binding : Law Society
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/971479
RWANDA legal challenge latest. Later than I had hoped due to other commitments. Today was an important day because we got to hear the government’s full legal arguments for the first time. Some takeaways:
First off, Lord David Pannick QC is leading for the government (yes the very same). One of his lines of defence is quite simple amid the 100,000,000s of documents in this case.
Basically… back in 2004 Tony Blair’s government passed an immigration act that gives ministers the power to send an asylum seeker to another safe country. Here’s the relevant part of that power
▻https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/19/schedule/3/part/5
That power says the Home Secretary can transfer an asylum seeker to another state, providing they’re not a citizen of that place and - importantly - she is of the “opinion” that a) they will be safe and b) they won’t be bundled on a plane to somewhere that’s dangerous.
And that’s basically the heart of it. Lord Pannick today told the court that it could not decide for itself that the Home Secretary should comply with some other criteria that Parliament had not written into the law.
Lord Pannick: “The obligation on the UK is to either assess the claim or return the asylum seeker to a safe third country. If we choose to return the individual to a third country that is safe, then we, the UK, have complied with our obligations under the Refugee Convention.”
He added that while the Convention bans governments from imposing “penalties” on asylum seekers, that would not apply to sending them to a safe third country. (The other side say relocation to Rwanda would be a penalty.)
Now the pinch point in all of this for the government is the UN Refugee Agency’s warning that it does not think Rwanda has the capacity to manage the migrants and it may not treat people fairly and well. (See yesterday’s thread).
So the government is making a big play in court that the deal it has struck with Rwanda is water-tight. Here are some of those assurances Rwanda has provided to the UK. And the government’s team says these should carry “great weight”.
The assurances carry a caveat that if Rwanda breaches them, they can’t be taken to court:
That’s been highlighted by the other side - and the court is also asking Govt lawyers for a detailed response to the UN’s concerns about Rwanda. The case continues tomorrow and in theory Friday. Judgment won’t be for some while. Thanks for reading. Airline hired for UK’s #Rwanda deportations pulls out of scheme
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/977034
#Privilege_Style
UK-Rwanda migration deal expanded
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/1000558
Sending asylum seekers to #Rwanda will cost £169k a person, says Home Office
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/1007749
#coût #prix
Braverman plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda unlawful, appeal court rules
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/1008170
Novembre 2023: Supreme court rejects Rishi Sunak’s plan to send asylum seekers to #Rwanda
Décembre 2023 : Au Royaume-Uni, les députés adoptent le projet de loi permettant d’expulser des migrants au Rwanda
Janvier 2024 :
Royaume-Uni : le premier ministre, #Rishi_Sunak, parvient à faire voter le projet de loi visant à expulser des migrants vers le #Rwanda
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/1037198
Janvier 2024 :
Royaume-Uni : la Chambre des lords désapprouve le projet de loi qui organise le transfert des migrants vers le Rwanda
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/1037886
Février 2024 :
Au Royaume-Uni, un rapport parlementaire étrille le projet de loi qui permet l’expulsion de migrants vers le Rwanda
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/1041499
Rwanda: UK to pay at least $470m to Rwanda for asylum deal, watchdog says
Avril 2024 :
Au #Royaume-Uni, #Rishi_Sunak obtient l’adoption de la #loi sur l’expulsion des demandeurs d’asile au Rwanda
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/1050968
Avril 2024:
Home Office to detain asylum seekers across UK in shock Rwanda operation
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/1051770
30.04.2024 :
Le Royaume-Uni a envoyé un premier demandeur d’asile vers le Rwanda
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/1051905
Juillet 2024 : #Keir_Starmer confirme l’#abandon du projet d’expulsions de migrants du #Royaume-Uni vers le #Rwanda
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/1061585
Mars 2025 : #Rwanda : Londres refuse de payer à Kigali le solde de l’ancien accord sur l’expulsion de migrants
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/1102080
Mai 2025 :
Asile et migration - Le #Rwanda en discussions « initiales » avec les États-Unis sur un #accord_migratoire
▻https://seenthis.net/messages/1114515
#USA #Etats-Unis
