« So this vetting thing is not going too great. https://t.co/vn2Vz21y1f @conflictarm interview by @LouiseRidley #Syria https://t.co/nBnbBVMO5B »

/775590678667591680

  • Tiens donc, d’où viennent les armes de Daesh ? (Ou, si on veut le dire crûment : qui arme Daesh ?)

    This British Company Has Tracked Half A Million Illegal Weapons Fuelling Conflicts In Just Two Years (Conflict Armament Research)
    http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/illegal-weapons-conflicts-syria-conflict-armament-reasearch-tracki

    But the Islamic State arsenal now includes far newer models, “from 2013 to 2014 and even 2015 dates of manufacture,” Bevan says. Bevan has tracked this rise in recently-made weapons to Eastern Europe, including AK-47s, machine guns and explosives.

    His company is currently challenging the governments of Bulgaria and Serbia, among others, over the sale of weapons to Saudi Arabia. Despite signing an agreement saying it would not sell the weapons to any other countries, Saudi Arabia appears to send them “straight to Turkey”, from where they get into Islamic State’s hands “very, very rapidly” via illicit means.

    “We have a supply chain which goes from an Eastern European manufacturer, to a second Eastern European country, to Saudi Arabia, to Turkey, to a Syrian opposition group and then to Islamic State in Falluja in Iraq, in less than two months,” he says. “That’s almost direct. If you want to put something on a boat and float it, it’s going to take a month.”

    He said that this shows that anyone supplying weapons to Syrian opposition groups has “absolutely no control” over where they end up. Often, foreign powers think they are supplying one group with weapons but the agenda of the many opposition factions overlaps with that of IS. “Some of them are backing pretty hard line Islamist forces, and it’s very difficult to distinguish between them and Islamic State. They are subsumed within Islamic State, or have a deal with them, or the group will fracture and its fighters will leave with their weapons and join Islamic State.”

    “It means that anyone supplying Syrian opposition groups has absolutely no control over the ultimate destination of those weapons. It’s almost a mirror image of what happened in Afghanistan in the 1980s, in the sense that the US, Saudi Arabia and allied states were supplying weapons to the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence Agency. They then had discretion as to who to give them to. They picked the winners, which were the hard line Islamist forces that were the origins for Al Qaeda and the Taliban.”

    #very_very_rapidly #almost_direct

    Via Aron Lund, assorti du commentaire :
    https://twitter.com/aronlund/status/775590678667591680

    So this vetting thing is not going too great.