EXCLUSIVE - Huffington Post Writer : Editors Deleted My Article on Hillary’s Imminent Indictment, Disabled Me from Writing - Breitbart
Comme dans la plupart de ce genre d’affaires on n’a aucune idée de la véracité des informations. Après tout je crains que l’article censuré contienne quelques éléments dont l’authenticité sera prouvé dans l’avenir.
Oups, il y en a qui contredisent les affirmations contre les Clintons et leur fondation.
Meet Crazy Frank Huguenard, a CLASSIC BernieBro
I think I know why the thing was deleted: Huguenard is a liar. He falsely claimed that Hillary is being indicted because an official investigation revealed the Clinton Foundation to be a criminal enterprise.
Here is the actual wording:
James Comey and The FBI will present a recommendation to Loretta Lynch, Attorney General of the Department of Justice, that includes a cogent argument that the Clinton Foundation is an ongoing criminal enterprise engaged in money laundering and soliciting bribes in exchange for political, policy and legislative favors to individuals, corporations and even governments both foreign and domestic.
The truth: There is NO GODDAMNED INVESTIGATION OF THE CLINTON FOUNDATION and thus NO INDICTMENT.
L’article censuré du Huffington Post
Here’s what we do know. Tens of millions of dollars donated to the Clinton Foundation was funneled to the organization through a Canadian shell company which has made tracing the donors nearly impossible. Less than 10% of donations to the Foundation has actually been released to charitable organizations and $2M that has been traced back to long time Bill Clinton friend Julie McMahon (aka The Energizer). When the official investigation into Hillary’s email server began, she instructed her IT professional to delete over 30,000 emails and cloud backups of her emails older than 30 days at both Platte River Networks and Datto, Inc. The FBI has subsequently recovered the majority, if not all, of Hillary’s deleted emails and are putting together a strong case against her for attempting to cover up her illegal and illicit activities.
A conviction under RICO comes when the Department of Justice proves that the defendant has engaged in two or more examples of racketeering and that the defendant maintained an interest in, participated in or invested in a criminal enterprise affecting interstate or foreign commerce. There is ample evidence already in the public record that the Clinton Foundation qualifies as a criminal enterprise and there’s no doubt that the FBI is privy to significantly more evidence than has already been made public.
Under RICO, the sections most relevant in this case will be section 1503 (obstruction of justice), section 1510 (obstruction of criminal investigations) and section 1511 (obstruction of State or local law enforcement). As in the case with Richard Nixon after the Watergate Break-in, it’s the cover-up of a crime that will be the Clintons’ downfall. Furthermore, under provisions of title 18, United States Code: Section 201, the Clinton Foundation can be held accountable for improprieties relating to bribery. The FBI will be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that through the Clinton Foundation, international entities were able to commit bribery in exchange for help in securing business deals, such as the uranium-mining deal in Kazakhstan.
Hi, my name is Frank. Like everyone else, I’ve got a story but my story is not so important. What is important is that however the chapters and verses of my journey have unfolded, I’ve been fortunate enough to be able to take some of the lessons I’ve learned in this classroom we call life and disseminate that knowledge and wisdom in documentary films so that everyone can learn from them.
In the classical sense of the word, I’m a scientist. By this I mean to say that I’m someone who’s always had a thirst for knowledge and have questioned everything with a skeptical, but open mind. The word science is derived from the Latin words scientia, which means ’knowledge’ and scīre which means ’to know’. Throughout my life, I’ve experienced first-hand several instances of pre-cognition and telepathy that have proven to me that the worldview that we’ve been taught in our schools about the nature of reality is at best, incomplete, and at worst, completely wrong. Modern Science has evolved over the past few hundred years to totally deny us our spirituality and as a result, our planet is undergoing catastrophic changes. As a consequence, we need to take immediate action in the form of a major course correction that alters Modern Science to include consciousness as a fundamental component of our collective reality.
So over the past 20 years or so, I’ve embarked on something that I like to call spiritualology, which is the research, examination, interpretation, distillation and subsequent re-synthesis of science, religion, spirituality, philosophy, psychology, anthropology into a new model that can use to possibly explain and understand our spiritual existence. My goal is to be part of the evolution of human consciousness that is happening on the planet right now by helping people to become aware of, nurture and ultimately evolve their own consciousness.
Personally, between the many chapters of my life, I’ve been known to have a wry sense of humor, I’ve created a phenomenal new team sport, I’ve dabbled in heirloom tomatoes, operated a gourmet “Indian” pizza restaurant, wrote a little ditty about devotion and invented some very disruptive technologies in the telephony industry. The technologies I invented included in 2002 developing Visual Voicemail, ’Siri-like’ Mobile Voice Recognition Services & Universal Voicemail (years prior to the release of the iPhone) and in the year 2000, I developed a video communications platform that was basically a combination of the features of both YouTube & Skype (years before the introduction of Skype & YouTube).
All is well.
Conclusion : Il ne faut jamais croire ce qu’on lit « sur internet » sans avoir vérifié ses sources. Puisque cette phrase s’applique aussi à chaque journal, radio et émission de télévision, il est conseillé de ne donner son avis qu’àpropos de sujets qu’on a étudié soi même.
Le reste est silence.