Anonymous Leaks to the WashPost About the CIA’s Russia Beliefs Are No Substitute for Evidence

/anonymous-leaks-to-the-washpost-about-t

  • Anonymous Leaks to the WashPost About the CIA’s Russia Beliefs Are No Substitute for Evidence - Glenn Greenwald
    https://theintercept.com/2016/12/10/anonymous-leaks-to-the-washpost-about-the-cias-russia-beliefs-are-no-s

    The Washington Post late Friday night published an explosive story that, in many ways, is classic American journalism of the worst sort: the key claims are based exclusively on the unverified assertions of anonymous officials, who in turn are disseminating their own claims about what the CIA purportedly believes, all based on evidence that remains completely secret.

    […]

    Needless to say, Democrats – still eager to make sense of their election loss and to find causes for it other than themselves – immediately declared these anonymous claims about what the CIA believes to be true, and, with a somewhat sweet, religious-type faith, treated these anonymous assertions as proof of what they wanted to believe all along: that Vladimir Putin was rooting for Donald Trump to win and Hillary Clinton to lose and used nefarious means to ensure that outcome. That Democrats are now venerating unverified, anonymous CIA leaks as sacred is par for the course for them this year, but it’s also a good indication of how confused and lost U.S. political culture has become in the wake of Trump’s victory.

    • Petite traduction du 1er paragraphe.

      Le Washington Post a publié dans la nuit de vendredi dernier une histoire explosive qui, de plusieurs manières, est un journalisme américain classique de la pire espèce : les affirmations clefs sont exclusivement basée sur des assertions invérifiables d’officiels anonymes, qui à tour de rôle, ont transmis leurs propres affirmations sur ce que prétendument la CIA pense, toutes basée sur des preuves qui restent complètement secrètes.