Edit : @odilon a raison. Nous sommes souvent trop fainéant (ou alors on va beaucoup trop vite). Sur les thèmes ou les initiatives intéressantes, on devrait prendre l’habitude de remonter à la source originale - ou au plus près - le plus souvent possible, ce que je fais très volontiers ici. En essayant de faire vraiment attention à la manière dont on cite les journaux #journalisme comme Le Monde pour n’en citer qu’un. Mais oui, il y en a aussi beaucoup d’autres.
Identifying species threat hotspots from global supply chains : Nature Ecology & Evolution
►http://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-016-0023
http://www.nature.com/article-assets/npg/natecolevol/2017/s41559-016-0023/images_hires/m685/s41559-016-0023-f3.jpg 
http://www.nature.com/article-assets/npg/natecolevol/2017/s41559-016-0023/images_hires/m685/s41559-016-0023-f1.jpg Identifying hotspots of species threat has been a successful approach for setting conservation priorities. One important challenge in conservation is that, in many hotspots, export industries continue to drive overexploitation. Conservation measures must consider not just the point of impact, but also the consumer demand that ultimately drives resource use. To understand which species threat hotspots are driven by which consumers, we have developed a new approach to link a set of biodiversity footprint accounts to the hotspots of threatened species on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. The result is a map connecting consumption to spatially explicit hotspots driven by production on a global scale. Locating biodiversity threat hotspots driven by consumption of goods and services can help to connect conservationists, consumers, companies and governments in order to better target conservation actions.
