Le journalisme de nos jours : « non vérifiés, potentiellement invérifiables, et que nous n’avons pas pu vérifier », mais que nous publions tout de même :
▻https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/10/fbi-chief-given-dossier-by-john-mccain-alleging-secret-trump-russia-con
…later published the documents, which it said were “unverified and potentially unverifiable”.
The Guardian has not been able to confirm the veracity of the documents’ contents…
Je sais rien mais je dirai tout :
▻http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/1/11/14233898/cnn-bombshell-report-russia-blackmail-trump-explained-videotape-sex-money
We don’t know who CNN’s sources are or if those people’s information is accurate. We don’t know which Trump aides were allegedly dealing with the Russians or whether those Russians worked for Vladimir Putin’s government. And we don’t know the answer to the biggest question of them all: Just what does Russia have on Trump?