Voices | The Independent

/voices

  • Has anyone bothered to think about the staff working at quarantine hotels? | The Independent
    https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/quarantine-hotels-covid-red-list-migrant-workers-b1802864.html

    The government’s quarantine scheme requires 11 days of hotel isolation for travelers entering the UK from a “red list” of countries. But the entire initiative risks being undermined by policies which make it impossible for workers in the hotel industry to protect themselves from the spread of infection.We need to confront the possibility of the virus spreading between guests and staff, who must be able to take time off work to isolate if there is a risk they could have come into contact with an infected person. However, a low rate of statutory sick pay, alongside restrictions, especially for migrant workers, on access to financial support, means isolating from work can lead to destitution for many people in these jobs.
    The government needs to raise statutory sick pay from £95 per week, one of the lowest in Europe and utterly insufficient to support a family for 10 days or more of isolation. It also needs to scrap No Recourse to Public Funds (NRPF), which keeps migrant workers in poverty, and expand access to its one-off isolation payments of £500. Without these measures, workers in these hotels will face the impossible choice between isolating to protect their health and feeding their families. The hospitality sector in the UK has the highest proportion of migrant workers, making up 30 per cent of the workforce. Most migrants living and working in the UK are automatically subject to NRPF, leaving them unable to access the public safety net, including universal credit, child benefit, income support or housing benefit, regardless of their financial circumstances.
    Red list countries: Full list of 33 nations where hotel quarantine rules apply ‘I guess this means it is okay for me to be violated’ – migrant women have been forgotten in the domestic abuse bill. Long before the pandemic, NRPF conditions were causing severe financial hardship for migrants. For migrant workers in the hospitality sector, an industry hit particularly hard by the pandemic, job losses combined with NRPF conditions have meant they are unable to say “no” to high-risk working conditions and low pay. Throughout this pandemic, we have seen how frontline workers, often in low-paid work, have kept our country going. Yet these are the workers who are consistently undervalued by the government and by employers, despite the fact they have kept our shops open, our transports systems running and our shared spaces clean. The new mandatory hotel quarantine scheme is no exception. The responsibility for lowering Covid-19 transmission across our borders has fallen to low-paid hotel workers, security staff and cleaners. It is them ensuring that the scheme runs smoothly and safely. Low rates of sick pay and a reliance on the statutory minimum wage is prevalent in hospitality contracts, and even more so in cleaning and security contracts, which are often outsourced to agencies, and where insecure and zero-hours contracts are common.

    #Covid-19#migrant#migration#grandebretagne#sante#hotelquarantaine#travailleurmigrant#travailleurpremiereligne#frontiere#economie

  • Alien Nation: Why public support for migrants in the UK is about to disappear
    #Covid-19#migrant#migration#RoyaumeUni#xenophobie

    https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/coronavirus-immigration-hostile-environment-windrush-mujinga-alien-na

    Tens of millions of Britons on their doorsteps applauding an organisation propped up by foreign workers each week. A prime minister thanking two immigrants whose work as nurses saved his life. It would perhaps have seemed unthinkable from a Conservative government less than 10 years on from vans with “go home” emblazoned on the side, and indeed from the man who led a Brexit campaign warning of mass immigration from Turkey.

  • Like after #9/11, governments could use coronavirus to permanently roll back our civil liberties

    The ’emergency’ laws brought in after terrorism in 2001 reshaped the world — and there’s evidence that it could happen again.

    With over a million confirmed cases and a death toll quickly approaching 100,000, Covid-19 is the worst pandemic in modern history by many orders of magnitude. That governments were unprepared to deal with a global pandemic is at this point obvious. What is worse is that the establishment of effective testing and containment policies at the onset of the outbreak could have mitigated the spread of the virus. Because those in charge failed to bring in any of these strategies, we are now seeing a worrying trend: policies that trample on human rights and civil liberties with no clear benefit to our health or safety.

    Broad and undefined emergency powers are already being invoked — in both democracies and dictatorships. Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban was granted sweeping new powers to combat the pandemic that are unlimited in scope and effectively turn Hungary’s democracy into a dictatorship. China, Thailand, Egypt, Iran and other countries continue to arrest or expel anyone who criticizes those states’ response to coronavirus.

    The US Department of Justice is considering charging anyone who intentionally spreads the virus under federal terrorism laws for spreading a “biological agent”. Israel is tapping into previously undisclosed smartphone data, gathered for counterterrorism efforts, to combat the pandemic. States in Europe, anticipating that measures against Covid-19 will violate their obligations under pan-European human rights treaties, are filing official notices of derogation.

    A chilling example of the effects of emergency powers on privacy rights and civil liberties happened during the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attacks and the resulting “war on terror”, in which successive US presidents pushed the limits of executive power. As part of an effort to protect Americans from security threats abroad, US government officials justified the use of torture in interrogation, broad state surveillance tactics and unconstitutional military strikes, without the oversight of Congress. While the more controversial parts of those programs were eventually dismantled, some remain in place, with no clear end date or target.

    Those measures — passed under the guise of emergency — reshaped the world, with lasting impacts on how we communicate and the privacy we expect, as well as curbs on the freedoms of certain groups of people. The post-September 11 response has had far-reaching consequences for our politics by emboldening a cohort of populist leaders across the globe, who ride to election victories by playing to nationalist and xenophobic sentiments and warning their populations of the perils brought by outsiders. Covid-19 provides yet another emergency situation in which a climate of fear can lead to suspension of freedoms with little scrutiny — but this time we should heed the lessons of the past.

    First, any restriction on rights should have a clear sunset clause, providing that the restriction is only a temporary measure to combat the virus, and not indefinite. For example, the move to grant Hungary’s Viktor Orban sweeping powers has no end date — thus raising concerns about the purpose of such measures when Hungary is currently less affected than other regions of the world and in light of Orban’s general penchant for authoritarianism.

    Second, measures to combat the virus should be proportional to the aim and narrowly tailored to reach that outcome. In the case of the US Department of Justice debate as to whether federal terrorism laws can be applied to those who intentionally spread the virus, while that could act as a potent tool for charging those who actually seek to weaponize the virus as a biological agent, there is the potential for misapplication to lower-level offenders who cough in the wrong direction or bluff about their coronavirus-positive status. The application of laws should be carefully defined so that prosecutors do not extend the boundaries of these charges in a way that over-criminalizes.

    Third, countries should stop arresting and silencing whistleblowers and critics of a government’s Covid-19 response. Not only does this infringe on freedom of expression and the public’s right to know what their governments are doing to combat the virus, it is also unhelpful from a public health perspective. Prisons, jails and places of detention around the world are already overcrowded, unsanitary and at risk of being “superspreaders” of the virus — there is no need to add to an at-risk carceral population, particularly for non-violent offenses.

    Fourth, the collectors of big data should be more open and transparent with users whose data is being collected. Proposals about sharing a person’s coronavirus status with those around them with the aid of smartphone data should bring into clear focus, for everyone, just what privacy issues are at stake with big tech’s data collection practices.

    And finally, a plan of action should be put in place for how to move to an online voting system for the US elections in November 2020, and in other critical election spots around the world. Bolivia already had to delay its elections, which were key to repairing its democracy in a transitional period following former President Evo Morales’s departure, due to a mandatory quarantine to slow the spread of Covid-19. Other countries, including the US, should take note and not find themselves flat-footed on election day.

    A lack of preparedness is what led to the current scale of this global crisis — our rights and democracies should not suffer as a result.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/911-coronavirus-death-toll-us-trump-government-civil-liberties-a94586

    #le_monde_d'après #stratégie_du_choc #11_septembre #coronavirus #covid-19 #pandémie #liberté #droits_humains #urgence #autoritarisme #terrorisme #privacy #temporaire #Hongrie #proportionnalité #liberté_d'expression #surveillance #big-data #données

    ping @etraces

  • The Tory immigration system is broken – and these 10 new reasons prove it | The Independent
    #Covid-19#migrant#migration#RoyaumeUni#politique_migratoire

    https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/immigration-priti-patel-hostile-environment-conservative-home-office-

    From sitting on EU settlement scheme reports to ignoring its own guidance on asylum-seeking, there are more failings from the last few months alone than many realise

  • Iraq will be hit harder by the oil price drop than by coronavirus or Isis | The Independent

    https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/coronavirus-oil-price-fall-economy-iraq-protests-isis-a9505421.html

    Coronavirus appears to pose another dangerous threat to Iraq with its ramshackle public health system and millions of potential victims packed together. Iraq shares a long common border with Iran where Covid-19 is rife. Perhaps it is only a matter of time and the pandemic may yet devastate Iraq, but it has not done so for reasons that are obscure, but may include a young population and stringent curfews

    #Covid-19#Iraq#Economie#Pauvreté#Travailleur#migrant#Politique#réfugié#migration

  • Coronavirus is being used as an excuse to leave desperate migrants stranded at sea | The Independent
    #Covid-19#Mediterranee#coince#solidarite#migrant#migration

    https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/coronavirus-migrants-crossing-mediterranean-eu-libya-malta-italy-a947

    Tripoli is blackmailing the EU with the threat of an uncontrolled flow of people across the Mediterranean Sea at a time of extreme pressure on European nations

  • Ken Loach : « La crise du #Covid-19 expose l’échec de la #privatisation de la #santé »
    https://www.franceinter.fr/ken-loach-la-crise-du-covid-19-expose-l-echec-de-la-privatisation-de-la-

    Mais au-delà des hôpitaux, il faut parler de ce qui se passe dans les maisons de retraite et dans les établissements pour personnes handicapées, il faut parler des soignants et des aidants, y compris de ceux qui vont à domicile s’occuper des gens qui en ont besoin. Ces personnes-là n’ont aucune sécurité de l’emploi. La plupart ont des revenus misérables. Et la plupart n’ont pas d’équipements de protection.

    Pourquoi ? 

    Les maisons de retraite sont détenues par des sociétés privées. Et les aidants sont employés par des sociétés privées. Ils y travaillent au jour le jour, sans contrat sur la durée, parfois via des boîtes d’intérim. Ils touchent le salaire minimum et, souvent, n’ont aucune garantie horaire. Ils peuvent être appelés ou renvoyés dans la minute. Et pourtant, on leur demande de mettre leur vie en danger, sans équipement de protection, pour prendre soin de personnes par ailleurs très vulnérables.

    How the NHS is being dismantled in 10 easy steps | The Independent
    https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/how-the-nhs-is-being-dismantled-in-10-easy-steps-10474075.html

    (Article de 2015)

    #démantèlement #service_public #royaume_uni

  • You’ve heard about the violence in Chile. You probably haven’t heard their military learns its tactics in Israel
    Benjamin Zinevich | New York | The Independent | 22 octobre 2019
    https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/chile-protests-army-israel-palestine-santiago-pinera-pinochet-mapuche

    What started as a student act of civil disobedience against Santiago’s rising metro fares has now expanded outside the Chilean capital. In a sudden uprising against austerity and persistent economic inequality, a proposed fare increase (the equivalent of €0.02) was simply salt on an open wound for the poor and working-class citizens of Chile. Peaceful protests, when forcibly dispersed by the national police, have turned violent. The government, led by conservative billionaire President Sebastián Piñera, responded by declaring a state of emergency and calling in the military to quell protests, declaring that the state was “at war”.

    While the military enforces brutality towards civilians not seen since the dictatorship that ended in the early 1990s, it is important to highlight the international connections to such brutality. The state of Israel’s tactical and resource-based military support in the past and present for Chile should be noted in particular.

    During Augusto Pinochet’s US-supported regime, Chile witnessed tens of thousands of political adversaries imprisoned, killed, or disappeared. During these years, Israel and Chile had a collaborative relationship, as Israel was one of the main suppliers of arms to the military junta.

    (...)
    Today, the armed forces of both Chile and Israel make no attempts to hide their alliances, citing on the Chilean Embassy to Israel’s website the aims of “increasing the bonds with...Israel, in order to make knowledge, training and experiences exchange possible.” Chile and Israel signed an agreement in 2018 which spoke of encouraging further “cooperation in military education, training and doctrine” during Israeli General Yaacov Barak’s visit to Chile that year.

    (...)
    Outside of Chile and Israel, it’s important that we call out military partnerships that perpetuate the oppression of marginalized indigenous people. Such ties between the IDF and other countries’ armed forces should be investigated and questioned. Further militarization of communities does not produce peace, but further brutality and injustice — and it’s time we talked about why we’re ignoring that fact.

    #IsraelChili
    traduction en français : https://seenthis.net/messages/807604

  • The Iraqi people are in revolt – pushing the post-Saddam Hussein settlement to the brink of collapse | The Independent
    https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/iraq-protests-baghdad-adil-abdul-mahdi-revolution-a9142826.html

    Intense rage against government mass theft of Iraq’s resources has been there since 2003, but the Shia majority have usually been persuaded by their political leaders that they must stick together to stop al-Qaeda or Isis making a comeback. Up to the recapture of Mosul, the de facto Isis capital in 2017 after a nine-month siege, this argument often worked. But since then Isis has controlled no territory in Iraq and there have been no big bombings in Baghdad for three years. People are no longer so frightened by the fear of their families being murdered that they are prepared to ignore the mass corruption and lack of basic services.

    #kleptocrates #Irak #dirigeants_arabes #indigents_arabes

  • Adieu Jakarta, l’Indonésie déplace sa capitale sur l’île de Bornéo
    https://www.courrierinternational.com/revue-de-presse/demenagement-adieu-jakarta-lindonesie-deplace-sa-capitale-sur

    La nouvelle capitale indonésienne sera construite dans la province de #Kalimantan-Est, sur l’île de #Bornéo. Une décision annoncée par le président Joko Widodo pour rééquilibrer le territoire indonésien, mais qui suscite de nombreuses réactions négatives.[...]

    Le coût financier d’une telle opération, chiffré par le gouvernement lui-même à 466 000 milliards de roupies, soit 30 milliards d’euros, et le coût environnemental sont parmi les principales critiques soulevées par ce projet, prévu pour être en partie achevé d’ici à 2024.

    Après c’est paywall #Indonésie

    • #merci

      D’après le texte, la localisation – encore à préciser – serait plutôt un peu plus au nord, à cheval sur les deux provinces :

      The government has conducted in-depth studies in the past three years and as a result of those studies the new capital will be built in part of North Penajam Paser regency and part of Kutai Kertanegara regency in East Kalimantan.

      soit, sur l’autre carte, quelque part entre Samarinda et Balikpapan, cœur pétrolier de l’Indonésie.

    • Juste pour voir (ça m’étonne toujours que ce ne soit pas le premier truc qu’on mette en illustration) la densité de population en Indonésie…


      Map of Indonesia and its population density. (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2017).

      À voir à l’usage. Il y a déjà pas mal d’exemples de doublets capitale politique/capital économique :
      • Brasilia / São Paulo-Rio de Janeiro
      • Canberra / Sidney
      • Astana / Almaty
      • Naypyidaw / Yangon (Rangoun)
      • Berlin / Francfort-sur-le-Main (on va dire)
      • Berne / Zurich
      • Rome / Milan
      • Washington / euh…
      etc…

    • Casse-tête foncier autour de la future capitale indonésienne

      Plusieurs groupes revendiquent les terres situées sur le site de la future capitale indonésienne. Un obstacle au projet de construction que le gouvernement cherche à lever.

      https://www.courrierinternational.com/article/carte-casse-tete-foncier-autour-de-la-future-capitale-indones

    • Will Indonesia’s new capital just move the problem to the jungle?

      After years of speculation and debate, Indonesia announced last week that it will be moving its capital from Jakarta to East Kalimantan, nearly 1,300km (800 miles) away.

      Jakarta has become crowded and polluted and is sinking at an alarming rate. East Kalimantan, on Indonesia’s part of Borneo island, couldn’t be more of a contrast - it’s known for its lush rainforest and is home to orang-utans and other rare wildlife.

      The move will cost an estimated 466 trillion rupiah ($32.79bn; £26.73bn) and will be one of the biggest infrastructure projects the government has ever undertaken.

      So what will it take to uproot a capital - and at what cost?
      Why is this happening?

      Researchers say that large parts of Jakarta, home to more than 10 million people, could be entirely submerged by 2050.

      North Jakarta has sunk by 2.5m (8ft) over the past 10 years and is continuing to sink an average of 1-15cm a year. Almost half the city is already below sea level.

      One of the main causes is the extraction of groundwater to meet the growing city’s needs. The city is also built on marshy lands and the surrounding seas are rising.

      The city’s traffic jams are also notorious - government ministers have to be escorted by police convoys to get to meetings on time.

      The planning minister has said snarl-ups costs the economy 100 trillion rupiah ($6.8bn, £5.4bn) a year.

      The fastest-sinking city in the world
      Changing places: Why countries decide to move capitals
      All you need to know about Indonesia

      Jakarta is also one of the most air-polluted in the world and is overcrowded and expensive - many people live in informal housing settlements.
      Where will the new capital be?

      It will be built across two regencies called Kutai Kartanegara and Penajam Paser Utara in the region of East Kalimantan. Work is slated to begin in 2024.

      Plans show it will cover around 180,000 hectares - that’s three times the size of Jakarta.

      Indonesian President Joko Widodo has said the area was chosen for several reasons. For one, it’s not as exposed to the natural disasters - floods, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and tsunamis - which plague other parts of Indonesia.

      It’s also near urban areas that are already relatively developed - the cities of Balikpapan and Samarinda.

      “[There is already] some infrastructure and existing cities [nearby],” Johannes Widodo, an associate professor in the National University of Singapore’s School of Design and Environment told the BBC.

      The actual site of the new capital, however, is relatively undeveloped. It’s mostly palm oil plantations and forests that have been cleared by logging, said WWF Indonesia director for Kalimantan Irwan Gunawan.

      These areas were once home to rich vegetation but have already been “destroyed” in the years past - and Mr Gunawan told the BBC he was worried that this destruction will only grow once the new capital is developed.

      Jakarta will still remain the centre of business and trade - it’s just the country’s administrative headquarters that will be moving.

      But Mr Gunawan said that "as a developing country, all the decisions are made in the central government area.

      This is “going to attract massive migration and if people are moving in it’s unavoidable they would need houses, and you need timber for construction... so it’s possible that logging would get worse”.

      Some of this migration is already happening. Agung Podomoro Land, a property developer, announced that it would be building luxury apartments, hotels, shopping malls and other facilities in East Kalimantan.

      In nearby North Kalimantan province, a massive project to build a hydropower plant said to be worth $17.8bn is also in the works. It’s clear the government is doing its bit to develop Kalimantan as a whole.
      What effect will this have on the environment?

      East Kalimantan is still home to a diverse range of wildlife and lush rainforests. It’s especially known for being home to orang-utans.

      The Indonesian government says at least 50% of the capital will consist of green spaces. The Minister of National Development Planning Bambang Brodjonegoro has called the concept a “forest city”.

      But Mr Gunawan isn’t convinced.

      “It’s not enough by saying that this new capital would be maintained as a forest city - it’s not only that exact area but the surrounding areas that need to be considered,” he said.

      “Orang-utans have already suffered significant decline over the past 20 years due to the expansion of palm oil plantations and logging. Their habitats are far away from the new capital but as it grows, new settlements will grow... and will eventually reduce the habitats of the orang-utans. It’s just a matter of time.”

      Another campaigner from environmental group The Indonesian Forum for the Environment (WALHI) agrees.

      “Deforestation will happen. More mining for construction material [will take place],” Sawung, an Urban and Energy campaigner at WALHI, told the BBC.

      Sawung - who uses one name - adds that if the government does not do its part to tackle the problems that plagued Jakarta, “it’s only [moving] Jakarta’s problems - of water, air pollution, transport and housing - to Kalimantan”.
      What about the people who are already there?

      At the moment, almost all of the wealth from the natural resources in this area flow to Java - the island on which Jakarta sits. Indonesians outside of Java have long complained about being neglected by the central government.

      One resident of East Kalimantan told BBC News Indonesian that it would be “nice to be close to the central government”. Another said they hoped it would translate to better resources in the area.

      But Mr Sawung say many locals still remain “sceptical” about the move, saying they believed only “government officials and businessman” would benefit.

      And there’s another big group of people who have not been consulted - Kalimantan’s indigenous groups, known collectively as the Dayaks.

      “The Dayak are forest-dependent people... their ways help us maintain the forest ecosystem. Their rights should be protected. We don’t want them to become like the [indigenous people] of Jakarta who have been sidelined,” said Mr Gunawan.

      Advocacy group Minority Rights Group International (MRGI) says the move would “destroy” the Dayak’s environment.

      “The Dayaks have been persistent victims of environmental degradation,” Joshua Castellino of the MRGI told news agency Reuters.

      “The abandonment of Jakarta due to pollution and overcrowding is hardly an endorsement for a move into someone else’s backyard where the same will likely occur.”

      https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-49481090

  • Les élues américaines Ilhan Omar et Rashida Tlaib non grata en Israël
    Par Guillaume Gendron — 15 août 2019 à 20:56
    https://www.liberation.fr/planete/2019/08/15/les-elues-americaines-ilhan-omar-et-rashida-tlaib-non-grata-en-israel_174

    Faut-il les empêcher d’entrer ? La question a accaparé ondes et pixels toute la journée de jeudi en Israël, à deux jours de l’arrivée prévue de deux élues démocrates américaines, farouches opposantes à Donald Trump et partisanes résolues de la cause palestinienne. Finalement, le Premier ministre, Benyamin Nétanyahou, a tranché. « Nous n’autoriserons pas ceux qui nient notre droit à exister dans ce monde à entrer en Israël », a annoncé sa vice-ministre des Affaires étrangères. Ainsi Ilhan Omar, députée du Minnesota, et Rashida Tlaib, du Michigan, sont officiellement persona non grata.

    Accusées « de provocations et de promotion du BDS [Boycott, Désinvestissement et Sanctions ; un mouvement international de boycott d’Israël pour mettre fin à l’occupation, ndlr] », ces deux figures de l’aile gauche du Parti démocrate étaient interdites de mettre un pied sur le tarmac de l’aéroport Ben-Gourion, à Tel-Aviv, d’où elles comptaient rallier les Territoires palestiniens, dont la visite était tout l’enjeu de leur venue, présentée comme « une délégation du Congrès dans les Territoires occupés de Palestine ». Les deux femmes devaient sillonner la Cisjordanie du 18 au 22 août, de Bethléem à Hébron, en passant par Ramallah, afin de « voir l’occupation de leurs propres yeux et ce que l’argent américain finance réellement en Israël », selon une personnalité impliquée dans le déplacement avorté. Une visite de l’hypersensible site de l’esplanade des Mosquées était au programme pour les deux premières musulmanes au Congrès.

    Pour justifier sa décision, le gouvernement israélien invoque un amendement voté à la Knesset en 2018, qui enjoint le ministère de l’Intérieur à refuser l’entrée de tout étranger ayant « publiquement appelé au boycott de l’Etat d’Israël ». C’est la première fois que cet arsenal législatif, dont la Cour suprême a déjà cassé plusieurs des tentatives d’application, est utilisé contre des élus d’un pays allié d’Israël.

    Jeudi dans la soirée, le cabinet du Premier ministre a toutefois fait savoir que Rashida Tlaib, d’origine palestinienne, pourrait recevoir un simple « visa humanitaire » pour rencontrer ses grands-parents et sa belle-famille, résidents d’un village de Cisjordanie, à condition de promettre ne pas « promouvoir le boycott d’Israël ». Ilhan Omar, elle, reste bannie. « Un affront », a-t-elle dénoncé jeudi soir dans un communiqué. (...)

    #Ilhan_Omar #Rashida_Tlaib
    https://seenthis.net/messages/797277

    • Ilhan Omar et Rashida Tlaib réagissent à l’interdiction d’entrer en Israël
      16 août 2019 à 07:42 - dernière modification 16 août 2019 à 09:45
      https://www.i24news.tv/fr/actu/international/ameriques/1565934084-ilhan-omar-et-rashida-tlaib-reagissent-a-l-interdiction-d-entrer-

      Les membres du Congrès, Ilhan Omar et Rashida Tlaib, ont tous deux répondu jeudi soir à l’annonce de leur interdiction d’entrer en Israël, avant leur visite prévue dans le pays.

      « Que le Premier ministre israélien Benyamin Netanyahou, sous la pression de Donald Trump, refuse l’entrée (en Israël et dans les Territoires palestiniens) de deux représentantes de l’Etat américain, représente un affront », a-t-elle écrit sur Twitter.

      « Refuser l’entrée en Israël limite non seulement notre capacité à apprendre des Israéliens, mais également à entrer dans les territoires palestiniens, ce qui n’est malheureusement pas une surprise, étant donné les positions publiques du Premier ministre Netanyahou, qui a toujours résisté aux efforts de paix », a-t-elle ajouté.

      « L’ironie c’est que la ‘seule démocratie’ au Moyen Orient prend une telle décision. C’est à la fois une insulte aux valeurs démocratiques et une réponse effrayante à la visite de responsables gouvernementaux d’un pays allié », a-t-elle encore dit.

      Rashida Tlaib a également réagi jeudi à l’interdiction israélienne, qualifiant le mouvement de signe de faiblesse.

      « Cette femme ici, c’est ma raison d’être », a écrit Tlaib sur Twitter avec une photo de sa grand-mère.

      « Elle mérite de vivre en paix et dans la dignité humaine. Je suis ce que je suis à cause d’elle. La décision prise par Israël d’interdire à sa petite-fille, une femme du Congrès américain, (d’entrer en Israël) est un signe de faiblesse parce que la vérité sur ce qui arrive aux Palestiniens est effrayante », a-t-elle insisté.

      https://twitter.com/RashidaTlaib/status/1162073791595470849

    • Israël interdit à Ilhan Omar et Rashida Tlaib de se rendre en visite en Israël
      15 août 2019
      https://www.bbc.com/afrique/region-49361199

      (...) Tom Malinowski, membre du Congrès du New Jersey, a qualifié cette décision de « irrespectueuse envers le Congrès » et a déclaré que lors d’un voyage multipartite du Congrès en Israël la semaine dernière, des fonctionnaires leur ont assuré que leurs collègues seraient autorisés à se rendre en Israël.

      D’abord, il dit à la députée Tlaib de « retourner » dans « son » pays, puis il dit à ce pays de ne pas la laisser entrer ", s’est-il indigné sur Twitter, en faisant référence aux commentaires de M. Trump.

      La sénatrice et candidate à la présidence du Massachusetts, Elizabeth Warren, a qualifié de « honteuse » et de « sans précédent » cette initiative contre un membre du Congrès américain.

    • Israël interdit la visite de Rashida Tlaib et Ilhan Omar, élues américaines et adversaires de Trump

      Le président américain avait encouragé Israël à leur interdire l’entrée sur son territoire, affirmant qu’elles « détestent Israël et tous les juifs ».

      Le Monde avec AFP Publié hier à 16h56, mis à jour hier à 20h45
      https://www.lemonde.fr/international/article/2019/08/15/israel-envisage-d-interdire-la-visite-de-deux-elues-americaines_5499742_3210

    • Israel approves Rashida Tlaib petition to enter ’on humanitarian grounds’ to visit grandmother
      Noa Landau | Aug. 16, 2019 | 11:53 AM
      https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-israel-approves-rashida-tlaib-petition-to-enter-on-humanitarian-gr

      Israel has decided to approve a petition by U.S. Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib to enter Israel on ’humanitarian grounds’ so she may visit her Palestinian grandmother, the Interior Ministry announced Friday, this after it barred her from entering the country due to her support for the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement.

      In a letter she sent to Interior Minister Arye Dery, Tlaib wrote that she is requesting approval to visit Israel “in order to visit relatives, especially my grandmother who is in her nineties, and lives in Beit Ur al-Fauqa. This may be my last opportunity to see her.”

      Dery’s bureau released a statement Friday morning saying that Tlaib’s request was approved. “Tlaib sent a letter last night to Minister Dery, in which she promised to hold to Israel’s requests, respect the limitations put on her for the visit and also affirmed that she would not promote the boycott against Israel during her visit.” Dery expressed hope that “she will stand by her obligations and the visit will be for humanitarian means alone.”

      Under pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reversed his decision Thursday to let Tlaib and fellow BDS-supporting congresswoman Ilhan Omar into Israel. After the decision was made, the Michigan congresswoman uploaded a picture of her grandmother to Twitter and wrote “The decision by Israel to bar her granddaughter, a U.S. congresswoman, is a sign of weakness because the truth of what is happening to Palestinians is frightening.”

      Public Security Minister Gilad Erdan wrote Friday morning that Tlaib’s request must be approved “mainly in light of the need to respect Israeli law and not to advance the boycott against us.” Erdan, who does not have the authority to make that decision, did tweet that the decision to ban the two congresswomen from entering Israel was “correct and just” because of their support for the boycott movement.

      Netanyahu decided to deny Tlaib and Omar entry to Israel after Trump said that “It would show great weakness if Israel allowed Rep. Omar and Rep. Tlaib to visit.” The policy reversal was justificed by the claim that their visit intends to “strengthen the boycott and invalidate Israel’s legitimacy.”

      Last month, Israeli Ambassador to the United States Ron Dermer announced that Tlaib and Omar would be allowed to enter the country: “Out of respect for the U.S. Congress and the great alliance between Israel and America”, his government would not deny entry “to any member of Congress."

    • Israël autorisera la visite de l’élue américaine Rashida Tlaib au motif d’une « visite humanitaire »
      16 août 2019 à 11:15 - dernière modification 16 août 2019 à 11:37
      https://www.i24news.tv/fr/actu/israel/1565946899-israel-autorisera-la-visite-de-l-elue-americaine-rashida-tlaib-au

      Les autorités israéliennes vont autoriser l’entrée sur leur territoire à l’élue démocrate américaine Rashida Tlaib pour motif « humanitaire », a indiqué vendredi le ministre de l’Intérieur.

      Israël avait annoncé la veille avoir interdit la visite de Mme Tlaib et d’une autre élue américaine Ilhan Omar en raison de leur soutien au mouvement de boycott de l’Etat hébreu et à la suite d’une demande du président Donald Trump.

      Mais le ministre Arié Dery a décidé vendredi d’autoriser l’entrée de Mme Tlaib « pour une visite humanitaire à sa grande-mère ». Rashida Tlaib a aussi « promis de ne pas faire avancer la cause du boycott contre Israël durant son séjour », selon un communiqué du ministre.
      (...)
      Mais dans la nuit de jeudi à vendredi, Rashida Tlaib a écrit aux autorités israéliennes pour leur demander de pouvoir visiter sa famille, et plus particulièrement sa grand-mère, qui vit dans le village de Beit Ur al-Fauqa, près de Ramallah, en Cisjordanie occupée.

      « Il pourrait s’agir de ma dernière chance de pouvoir lui rendre visite », a fait valoir l’élue américaine dans sa lettre mise en ligne.

      #BDS

    • STATEMENT FROM DEMOCRATIC MAJORITY FOR ISRAEL CO-CHAIR ANN LEWIS AND PRESIDENT AND CEO MARK MELLMAN ON THE ISRAELI GOVERNMENT’S DECISION TO DENY ENTRY TO U.S. CONGRESSWOMEN RASHIDA TLAIB AND ILHAN OMAR
      https://demmajorityforisrael.org/press-releases/statement-omar-tlaib-trip

      WASHINGTON, D.C. (August 15, 2019) – In response to the Israeli government’s decision to prevent Representatives Tlaib and Omar from entering the country, Democratic Majority for Israel Co-Chair Ann Lewis, and President and CEO Mark Mellman, issued the following statement:

      “While we disagree strongly with the anti-Israel, and in some instances antisemitic, views articulated by Congresswomen Tlaib and Omar, and while we were disturbed to learn that their planned itinerary was completely unbalanced, there is simply no excuse for any country, including Israel, to prevent travel by elected officials of the United States. Unfortunately, the Government of Israel was both wrong and unwise to reverse their earlier decision to allow these elected Members of Congress to visit the country. (...)

      http://english.pnn.ps/2019/08/16/congresswoman-tlaibs-statement-on-travel-to-palestine-israel

    • Rashida Tlaib
      ‏@RashidaTlaib

      https://twitter.com/RashidaTlaib/status/1162333169846247425

      My sity wanted to pick figs w/ me. I broke down reading this & worry every single day after I won for my family’s safety. My cousin was texting me which photo of @IlhanMN & I they should put on a welcoming poster when I heard the news. I couldn’t tell her.

      https://twitter.com/RashidaTlaib/status/1162341203406401536

      When I won, it gave the Palestinian people hope that someone will finally speak the truth about the inhumane conditions. I can’t allow the State of Israel to take away that light by humiliating me & use my love for my sity to bow down to their oppressive & racist policies.

      https://twitter.com/RashidaTlaib/status/1162341203406401536

      When I won, it gave the Palestinian people hope that someone will finally speak the truth about the inhumane conditions. I can’t allow the State of Israel to take away that light by humiliating me & use my love for my sity to bow down to their oppressive & racist policies.

      ““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““

      DETROIT – Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (MI-13) released the following statement regarding travel to Israel and Palestine:
      August 16, 2019. Press Release
      https://tlaib.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-tlaib-s-statement-travel-palestine-israel

      "In my attempt to visit Palestine, I’ve experienced the same racist treatment that many Palestinian-Americans endure when encountering the Israeli government. In preparation for my visit, my grandmother was deciding which fig tree we would pick from together, while Palestinians and Israelis who are against the illegal military occupation were looking forward to Members of Congress finally listening to and seeing them for the first time. The Israeli government used my love and desire to see my grandmother to silence me and made my ability to do so contingent upon my signing a letter – reflecting just how undemocratic and afraid they are of the truth my trip would reveal about what is happening in the State of Israel and to Palestinians living under occupation with United States support.

      “I have therefore decided to not travel to Palestine and Israel at this time. Visiting my grandmother under these oppressive conditions meant to humiliate me would break my grandmother’s heart. Silencing me with treatment to make me feel less-than is not what she wants for me – it would kill a piece of me that always stands up against racism and injustice. (...)

      ““““““““““““““““““““““““““““
      Rep. Ilhan Omar Statement on Prime Minister Netanyahu’s Decision to Deny Her Entry into Israel
      August 15, 2019
      Press Release

      https://omar.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-ilhan-omar-statement-prime-minister-netanyahus-decision-deny-her-ent

    • La famille de Rashida Tlaib pas surprise par les obstacles érigés par Israël à sa venue en Cisjordanie
      Les proches de la première femme d’origine palestinienne à être élue au Congrès américain se préparent depuis juillet à la venue de celle en qui ils voient un espoir pour la cause de leur peuple
      Par Shatha Hammad
      – BEIT UR AL-FAWQA, Cisjordanie occupée
      Date de publication : Vendredi 16 août 2019 - 09:35


      https://www.middleeasteye.net/fr/reportages/la-famille-de-rashida-tlaib-decue-mais-pas-surprise-par-linterdiction

      (...) Rashida a passé la majeure partie de sa vie aux États-Unis, se rendant en Palestine chaque été.

      C’est dans la maison de ses grands-parents que les célébrations de son mariage, en 1997, ont commencé. La grand-mère de Rashida, Muftiya, qui, avec l’âge, a perdu la plus grande partie de son audition, a déclaré à MEE que ce qui la rendait le plus heureuse était la possibilité que Rashida cueille des figues directement sur les arbres du jardin de son grand-père.

      « Je suis tellement fière d’elle. J’ai fait les préparatifs pour sa cérémonie de remise des diplômes au lycée, puis pour son diplôme universitaire et, aujourd’hui, nous célébrerons son élection au Congrès », déclarait Muftiya à MEE en début de semaine.

      Jeudi après-midi, Bassam, l’oncle de Rashida, a indiqué à MEE que la famille n’avait pas encore informé Muftiya de l’interdiction prononcée à l’encontre de sa petite-fille, craignant que cela n’affecte sa santé.

      « Nous ne sommes pas surpris par cette décision », a-t-il ajouté. « Nous nous attendions à ce que l’occupation lui interdise d’entrer en Palestine à tout moment. » (...)

  • I saw children being gassed on the Champs-Elysees last week – police violence in France is out of control | The Independent
    https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/gilets-jaunes-protesters-french-police-violence-tear-gas-video-latest

    Even in a city as traditionally turbulent as Paris, recent scenes of police violence have been exceptionally shocking. Victims over the past few weeks have ranged from journalists and students to environmentalists and asylum seekers. 

    No matter what their background, or political persuasion, all have been viewed as legitimate targets for heavily armed paramilitaries trained to deal with any perceived threat to order with extreme brutality. These specialist riot control officers – and there are thousands of them – consider summer as a time when every type of undesirable takes to the streets, and they see nothing wrong with imposing their authority as harshly as possible. 

    The sheer horror of the situation was made abundantly clear on the Champs-Elysees last week where – as usual – the catalyst for much social disorder was France’s forces of law and order using chemical weapons on their own citizens.

    Videos shot on the most famous avenue in the country show young children struggling to get away from clouds of fumes created by teargas that is banned in warzones. Astonishing as it may sound, French police are allowed to use substances designed to burn eyes, mouths and lungs against ordinary civilians, but, because of international treaties, soldiers up against genuine enemies are not.

    Dans la vidéo jointe on ne voit rigoureusement rien qui justifie l’emploi – massif – de gaz lacrymogènes.

  • Here’s how to talk about Israel without sliding into antisemitism | The Independent
    https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/antisemitism-labour-israel-netanyahu-palestine-david-schneider-a89059

    Avoid saying “Zionist” or “Zionism” when discussing contemporary Israel/Palestine. The terms are too loaded now, too coarse and broad in their application, and too often used by hardcore antisemites to mean simply Jews.

    Benjamin Netanyahu is a Zionist, but so are Israeli lawyers and peace activists fighting to achieve justice for Palestinians. You cannot lump them all together. Fair enough when talking historically, as long as you’re informed and precise, but for the present day, I recommend using specific terms instead, such as “the Israeli government” or “Netanyahu”.

    Misled again by the arbiters of anti-semitism
    https://www.jonathan-cook.net/blog/2019-05-11/misled-again-by-the-arbiters-of-anti-semitism

    Schneider has lost no time in revealing the nub of the problem with his guide. He is a liberal Zionist, and understandably he feels uncomfortable being lumped in with Netanyahu. But the primary goal of Palestinians and their supporters isn’t to make Schneider or other liberal Zionists feel comfortable with their political views or to comply with their demand that “legitimate” criticism of Israel be restricted to Netanyahu.

    Yes, some anti-semites may use “Zionist” as code for “Jew”. But Schneider is demanding his cake and eating it in insisting that the core ideology driving Israeli policy towards the Palestinians for more than seven decades be declared largely unmentionable.

    Zionism wasn’t just a historical prelude to Israel’s creation, some anachronism to be deposited in a museum. All the major political parties in Israel still firmly define themselves as Zionist. It is at the core of their political programmes, meaning that they share much common ground. The parties are often divided chiefly about how to achieve their political goals, not what those goals are.

    [...]

    So, in other words, there is no way to understand or critique Israel’s political system, or the nature of its abuses of Palestinians, or the ideology espoused by its supporters abroad, without analysing Zionism and its aims.

    Schneider’s formula makes as much sense as demanding back in the 1980s that “legitimate criticism” of South Africa not address the country’s overarching apartheid ideology but be reserved specifically for P W Botha and his government. Following Schneider’s advice would make useful, reasoned criticism of Israel impossible.

    #sionisme #sionistes #Palestine

  • Italian governing party wants to ban political science textbook which describes it as ’far-right’

    Italy’s governing far-right party has called for a political science textbook which describes it as “extreme right” and xenophobic to be banned from a university course.

    La Lega di Salvini, by academics #Gianluca_Passarelli and #Dario_Tuorto, describes the message of the League’s leader Salvini’s message as having “fascist traits”.

    “The party has taken on the features of an extreme right formation, with racist, xenophobic, politically and socially violent traits,” it says.

    But when the book was put on the reading list of political science students at the University of Bologna, League representatives in the university’s region of Emilia Romagna called for action to be taken.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/italy-far-right-party-le-lega-di-salvini-science-textbook-a8871171.ht

    #extrême_droite #manuels_scolaires #Salvini #censure #Italie #université #Bologne #sciences_politiques #mots #terminologie #vocabulaire #fascisme #livre

    • La Lega di Salvini. Estrema destra di governo

      «A livello internazionale la priorità è sgretolare questo euro e rifondare questa Europa. Sì, quindi, alle alleanze anche con gli unici che non sono europirla: i francesi della Le Pen, gli olandesi di Wilders, gli austriaci di Mölzer, i finlandesi… insomma, con quelli dell’Europa delle patrie»
      Matteo Salvini

      Da tempo la Lega ha scelto di posizionarsi nell’area dell’estrema destra: una virata che ha consentito al partito di legittimarsi come forza trainante della coalizione conservatrice, tanto da stravolgerne l’assetto indebolendo l’area moderata. Nello scenario emerso con il voto del 2018 la Lega compete con l’altra formazione anti-establishment, il Movimento 5 Stelle, nel tentativo di monopolizzare il disagio economico e il disorientamento elettorale e di ricomporre, sul piano socio-territoriale, le istanze di cambiamento avanzate dagli elettori. Uno scenario inedito in cui due frères-ennemis si disputano l’egemonia politica e culturale in Italia.

      https://www.mulino.it/isbn/9788815279057

    • Italy has edged closer to fascism with a startling attack on academic freedom

      Anti-democratic views and sometimes violent undercurrents are not coming out of the blue. They have been legitimised over a couple of decades

      We live in an age marked by the return of right-wing, anti-democratic ethno-nationalism, and by the rise of anti-intellectualism. So perhaps it shouldn’t be a surprise that the world’s oldest academic institution is facing dangerous criticism from the demagogic far right.

      Representatives from Italy’s governing League party in Emilia Romagna have questioned the University of Bologna in the regional assembly because one of its political sciences courses uses an (apparently) “anti-Salvini” monograph. The academic book, written by respected scholars, political scientist Gianluca Passarelli and sociologist Dario Tuorto, is published by Il Mulino, a major publisher. The volume properly labels the League as an extreme right-wing party.

      The authors also claim that Salvini’s party displays fascist, xenophobic, and violent characteristics, recalling the interwar years or apartheid in South Africa.

      According to the League, however, the Emilia Romagna region should trigger its anti-discrimination policies to protect students who are ideologically close to the party, and who may be discriminated against in such a university course (and exam).

      Right-wing tabloids have provided a megaphone to spread the indignation even further. This may sound like a paradoxically funny story, but it is tremendously serious. It says a lot about the anti-pluralist features of the far right.

      For the League’s regional representatives, universities should not promote “anti-party” material or “political propaganda”. Perhaps most worryingly they argue that because the professors are public servants, they should be “loyal” to the state.

      Of course, a monograph which challenges some of the more “positive” public representations of a political leader is not against the overall state (let’s not forget that the state and the government are two different entities). And as such, statements like these appear symptomatic of an almost authoritarian mindset.

      There is also something else. Far-right activists are clearly trying to influence cultural agendas and public opinion by dismantling and shaping state education all across the western world.

      In Italy, the League’s manifesto is aiming at include more professional and practical subjects in high schools, perhaps with a subsidiary intention of reducing the number of students attending universities – they are deemed to be progressive left-wing institutions. In some local councils, the party has been also trying to shut down reading groups in public libraries or influence the organisation of existing cultural events.

      The desire to remove writings that are based on data and scientific reasoning, or to question academic teaching, is, however, a step further. It is a worrying attempt to silence free voices and critical thinking along with the undermining of all forms of social and cultural opposition. It is like turning the clock back to Italy’s fascist years, pushing intellectuals and professors to conform to the ruling authority’s anti-democratic and anti-liberal ideology. This is the means by which authoritarian regimes and dictatorships rule.

      And this also forms part of the type of society imagined by the contemporary far right. It is not only about walls, fences, the rejection of non-western cultures, the hijacking of Christianity, ethnic purity and privileges only for white indigenous people. The implication is that freedom of expression and academic autonomy will only be acceptable if they please power.

      This is clearly an outdated, anti-modern vision of society, but how far is it from what a far-right champion such as Viktor Orbán is trying to implement in his self-described “illiberal democracy” in Hungary? It is also perfectly in line with the idea of closed as well as pure communities (us versus them; friends and foes) which fascism has peddled since the interwar years.

      The problem today is that ultra-nationalism, right-wing extremism, and racism are being normalised, masked by slogans and concepts such as patriotism, sovereignty, “our nation first(ism)”, or a post-ideological national populism.

      The idea that the League is not an “extreme-right” party, and that higher education institutions must be faithful to the governing forces, also shows something specific about the current climate in Italy.

      This is the country where the word fascism was invented and where a great-grandson of Benito Mussolini is running in the EU elections for Fratelli d’Italia, a small far-right movement allied with Silvio Berlusconi. This is also the nation where La Repubblica journalist Paolo Berizzi has been under state protection since February because neo-fascist groups are threatening him.

      This fascistic nostalgia, these anti-democratic and sometimes violent undercurrents, are not coming out of the blue. They have been legitimised over a couple of decades. Since the arrival of Berlusconi on the political scene in the early 1990s, and through his political alliances with the League and the neo-fascist Italian Social Movement, lables such as “extreme” or “fascist” magically disappeared from the public discourse to be replaced by his own bizarre and vague definition of a “coalition of moderates”.

      By and large, the media and public opinion have accepted this mantra, but it has fostered an environment where racial prejudice and semi-authoritarian views can proliferate with few antidotes in sight. If we end up banning intellectual freedom, academic research, and university teaching, Italy will become the next illiberal democracy at the heart of the European Union.

      https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/italy-far-right-salvini-lega-league-university-bologna-fascism-a88707

      #fascisme

  • Israel is playing a big role in India’s escalating conflict with Pakistan
    Robert Fisk | The Independent - Thursday 28 February 2019
    Signing up to the ‘war on terror’ – especially ‘Islamist terror’ – may seem natural for two states built on colonial partition whose security is threatened by Muslim neighbours
    https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/israel-india-pakistan-conflict-balakot-arms-trade-jaish-e-mohammed-a8

    When I heard the first news report, I assumed it was an Israeli air raid on Gaza. Or Syria. Airstrikes on a “terrorist camp” were the first words. A “command and control centre” destroyed, many “terrorists” killed. The military was retaliating for a “terrorist attack” on its troops, we were told.

    An Islamist “jihadi” base had been eliminated. Then I heard the name Balakot and realised that it was neither in Gaza, nor in Syria – not even in Lebanon – but in Pakistan. Strange thing, that. How could anyone mix up Israel and India?

    Well, don’t let the idea fade away. Two thousand five hundred miles separate the Israeli ministry of defence in Tel Aviv from the Indian ministry of defence in New Delhi, but there’s a reason why the usual cliche-stricken agency dispatches sound so similar.

    For months, Israel has been assiduously lining itself up alongside India’s nationalist BJP government in an unspoken – and politically dangerous – “anti-Islamist” coalition, an unofficial, unacknowledged alliance, while India itself has now become the largest weapons market for the Israeli arms trade.

    Not by chance, therefore, has the Indian press just trumpeted the fact that Israeli-made Rafael Spice-2000 “smart bombs” were used by the Indian air force in its strike against Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) “terrorists” inside Pakistan

    Like many Israeli boasts of hitting similar targets, the Indian adventure into Pakistan might owe more to the imagination than military success. The “300-400 terrorists” supposedly eliminated by the Israeli-manufactured and Israeli-supplied GPS-guided bombs may turn out to be little more than rocks and trees.

    But there was nothing unreal about the savage ambush of Indian troops in Kashmir on 14 February which the JeM claimed, and which left 40 Indian soldiers dead. Nor the shooting down of at least one Indian jet this week.

    India was Israel’s largest arms client in 2017, paying £530m for Israeli air defence, radar systems and ammunition, including air-to-ground missiles – most of them tested during Israel’s military offensives against Palestinians and targets in Syria.

    Israel itself is trying to explain away its continued sales of tanks, weapons and boats to the Myanmar military dictatorship – while western nations impose sanctions on the government which has attempted to destroy its minority and largely Muslim Rohingya people. But Israel’s arms trade with India is legal, above-board and much advertised by both sides.

    The Israelis have filmed joint exercises between their own “special commando” units and those sent by India to be trained in the Negev desert, again with all the expertise supposedly learned by Israel in Gaza and other civilian-thronged battlefronts. (...)

    #IsraelInde

  • Judge Richard Goldstone suffered for turning his back on Gaza – but not as much as the Palestinians he betrayed | The Independent

    by Robert Fisk

    https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/israel-gaza-war-judge-richard-goldstone-palestinian-conflict-a8709211
    https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2010/02/02/00/310761.bin

    When a hero lets you down, the betrayal lasts forever. I’m not alone, I know, when I say that Richard Goldstone was a hero of mine – a most formidable, brilliant and brave judge who finally spoke truth to power in the Middle East. And then recanted like a frightened political prisoner, with protestations of love for the nation whose war crimes he so courageously exposed.

    Now, after years of virtual silence, the man who confronted Israel and Hamas with their unforgivable violence after the 2008-09 Gaza war has found a defender in a little known but eloquent academic. Judge Goldstone, a Jewish South African, was denounced by Israelis and their supporters as “evil” and a “quisling” after he listed the evidence of Israel’s brutality against the Palestinians of Gaza (around 1,300 dead, most of them civilians), and of Hamas’ numerically fewer crimes (13 Israeli dead, three of them civilians, plus a number of Palestinian “informer” executions).
    Professor Daniel Terris, a Brandeis University scholar admired for his work on law and ethics, calls his new book The Trials of Richard Goldstone. Good title, but no cigar. ​

    Terris is eminently fair. Perhaps he is too fair. He treats far too gently the column that Goldstone wrote for the Washington Post, in which the judge effectively undermined the research and conclusions of his own report that he and three others wrote about the Gaza war. The book recalls how Richard Falk, a Princeton law professor and former UN rapporteur on human rights in Gaza and the West Bank, described Goldstone’s retraction as “a personal tragedy for such a distinguished international civil servant”. I think Falk was right.

  • Cette photo d’un Palestinien protestant contre le blocus de Gaza est devenue virale
    Al HuffPost Maghreb - Par Salma Khouja - 25/10/2018
    https://www.huffpostmaghreb.com/entry/cette-photo-dun-palestinien-protestant-contre-le-blocus-de-gaza-est

    PALESTINE - Une photo déjà iconique. Alors qu’un groupe de palestiniens protestait contre le blocus maritime de la bande de Gaza, le 22 octobre dernier, le photographe de l’agence de presse turque Anadolu, Mustafa Hassouna, saisit les affrontements opposant les manifestants aux soldats de l’armée israélienne. Parmi les photos de Mustafa Hassouna, l’image ci-dessous, d’A’ed Abu Amro, 20 ans, devient virale.

    Interrogé par Al Jazeera, le jeune homme se dit surpris de la viralité de cette photo. “ Je ne vais pas à des manifestations pour pour me faire prendre en photo, mais cela m’encourage à continuer de manifester”, dit-il, précisant qu’il “manifeste toutes les semaines, et toujours accompagné de son drapeau. “Mes amis se moquent de moi, me disent que ce serait plus facile de jeter des pierres sans mon drapeau à la main, mais je m’y suis habitué (...) Si je meurs, je veux être enroulé dans ce drapeau. Nous réclamons notre droit au retour, et manifestons pour notre dignité et celle des générations à venir ”.

    Liberté guidant le peuple

    Largement partagé sur les réseaux sociaux, la photo n’a pas manqué de rappelé une célèbre toile à de nombreux internautes, qui comparent la photo au tableau de Delacroix, “La Liberté guidant le peuple” :

  • Here’s what I found out when I spent the day with Israel’s most controversial journalist, Gideon Levy
    Robert Fisk | The Independent | 27 septembre 2018
    https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/gideon-levy-robert-fisk-haaretz-israel-palestine-gaza-a8557691.html

    Gideon Levy is a bit of a philosopher king although, sitting in his postage stamp garden in a suburb of Tel Aviv, straw hat shading mischievous dark eyes, there’s a touch of a Graham Greene character about Haaretz’s most provocative and infamous writer. Brave, subversive, sorrowful – in a harsh, uncompromising way – he’s the kind of journalist you either worship or loathe. Philosopher kings of the Plato kind are necessary for our moral health, perhaps, but not good for our blood pressure. So Levy’s life has been threatened by his fellow Israelis for telling the truth; and that’s the best journalism award one can get.

    He loves journalism but is appalled by its decline. His English is flawless but it sometimes breaks up in fury. Here’s an angry Levy on the effect of newspaper stories: “In the year of ’86, I wrote about a Palestinian Bedouin woman who lost her baby after giving birth at a checkpoint. She tried at three different [Israeli] checkpoints, she couldn’t make it and she gave birth in the car. They [the Israelis] didn’t let her bring the baby to the hospital. She carried him by foot two kilometres to the Augusta Victoria [Hospital in east Jerusalem]. The baby died. When I published this story – I don’t want to say that Israel ‘held its breath’, but it was a huge scandal, the cabinet was dealing with it, two officers were brought to court…”

    Then Levy found ten more women who had lost babies at Israeli checkpoints. “And nobody could care less any more. Today, I can publish it and people will yawn if they read it at all. [It’s] totally normalised, totally justified. We have a justification now for everything. The dehumanisation of the Palestinians has reached a stage in which we really don’t care. I can tell you, really, without exaggeration, if an Israeli dog was killed by Palestinians, it will get more attention in the Israeli media than if 20 Palestinian youngsters would be shot dead by snipers on the fence – without doing anything – in Gaza. The life of Palestinians has become the cheapest thing. It’s a whole system of demonisation, of de-humanisation, a whole system of justification that ‘we’ are always right and we can never be wrong.” (...)

  • The major uprising in Basra and southern Iraq is what the world should be worrying about in the Middle East right now | The Independent
    https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/basra-iraq-protests-oil-uprising-patrick-cockburn-government-a8527521

    The causes of the protests are self-evident: Iraq is ruled by a kleptomaniac political class that operates the Iraqi state apparatus as a looting machine. Other countries are corrupt, notably those rich in oil or other natural resources, and the politically well connected become hugely wealthy. However big the rake-off, something is usually built at the end of the day.

    [...]

    Iraq will most likely continue to be misruled by a weak dysfunctional government, thereby opening the door to various dangers. Isis is down but not entirely out: it could rally its forces, perhaps in a different guise, and escalate attacks. Divisions within the Shiah community are growing deeper and more rancorous as the Sadrists – whose offices, unlike those of the other parties, have not been burned by demonstrators – grow in influence.

    A festering political crisis will not be confined to Iraq. The outside world should have learned this lesson from the aftermath of the US-led invasion of 2003. Rival Iraqi parties always seek foreign sponsors whose interests they serve as well as their own. The country is already one of the arenas of the escalating US-Iran confrontation. As with the threat of a cholera epidemic in Basra, Iraqi crises tend to spread swiftly and infect the whole region.

    #Irak #dirigeants_arabes #kleptocrates #indigents_arabes