Insurrectional Black Power: CLR James on Race and Class
▻https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/10/02/insurrectional-black-power-clr-james-on-race-and-class
Insurrectional Black Power: CLR James on Race and Class
▻https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/10/02/insurrectional-black-power-clr-james-on-race-and-class
Le Musée de l’Holocauste retire une étude sur l’inaction d’Obama en #Syrie | The Times of Israël
▻http://fr.timesofisrael.com/le-musee-de-lholocauste-retire-une-etude-sur-linaction-dobama-en-s
Le rapport [...] a déterminé qu’une intervention américaine après l’attaque chimique de 2013 contre Ghouta n’aurait pas réduit les atrocités dans le pays et aurait même pu y contribuer, selon Tablet.
Un message publié sur le site du musée indique que « la semaine dernière, le Centre Simon-Skjodt pour la prévention des génocides du Musée mémorial de l’Holocauste a publié une étude qui examinait plusieurs décisions prises pendant le conflit syrien. Depuis sa publication, plusieurs personnes avec qui nous avons étroitement travaillé sur la Syrie depuis l’éclatement du conflit ont fait part de leur inquiétude au sujet de cette étude. Le Musée a décidé de supprimer l’étude de son site internet le temps que nous examinions ces retours. »
Here Is the Syria Report the Holocaust Museum Unpublished
▻http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/09/here-is-the-holocaust-museum-syria-report.html
Why Did The Holocaust Museum Cancel Its Syria Study?
▻http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/09/why-did-the-holocaust-museum-cancel-its-syria-study.html
It’s unfortunate the Holocaust Museum has given in to this pressure. The study should be debated out in the open, not shouted down by the Leon Wieseltiers of the world.
The story for me is not what did the Museum remove or post about Syria: the story is what business is it for the Holocaust Museum to write reports on Syria or about any other conflict?
▻http://angryarab.blogspot.fr/2017/09/the-holocaust-museum-on-syria.html
l’original ici : ▻http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/244567/holocaust-museum-pulls-study-absolving-obama-administration-for-inaction- en fait il s’agissait de soit disant preuves sur le Rapport César qui a été reconnu comme ne prouvant rien voir des faux et commandé par le Qatar a un "cabinet spécialisé"."Le cabinet londonien d’avocats Carter-Ruck a publié un rapport accusant le « régime syrien actuel » (sic) de crimes de guerre et de crimes contre l’humanité, le 20 janvier 2014, soit deux jours avant l’ouverture de la Conférence de paix de Genève 2." ▻http://www.afrique-asie.fr/cadavres-de-damas-verite-ou-manipulation Petit rappel historique sur de nombreux mensonges d’états ayant été "débunkés trop tard ! Mais là nombreux médias dont des alternatifs ont dénoncé la supercherie : ▻https://www.counterpunch.org/2016/03/04/the-caesar-photo-fraud-that-undermined-syrian-negotiations/sur le prétendu gazage au sarin par Assad et son armée : ►https://www.counterpunch.org/2015/04/20/biased-reporting-on-syria-in-the-service-of-war critiques des photos qui semblent des répétitions à l’infini : ▻http://www.syriasolidaritymovement.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/CaesarPhotoFraudReport_v6.compressed.pdf
Biased Reporting on Syria in the Service of War » CounterPunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Names
►http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/04/20/biased-reporting-on-syria-in-the-service-of-war
The HRW report relies heavily on testimony and video/photo evidence from a biased source known as “Syria Civil Defence”. This organization is not what one might assume. Syria Civil Defence was funded and created by UK and USA. Initial training was provided in Turkey by former British military officer and current contractor based in Dubai. In the past year Syria Civil Defence has been rebranded as “White Helmets” by “The Syria Campaign” which itself is the creation of corporate PR firm. Syrian Civil Defence (aka White Helmets) is heavily into social media and actively campaigning for a No Fly Zone. The HRW report does not include any of the preceding information on Syria Civil Defence, its origins and obvious bias. Shouldn’t “evidence” received from them be considered with a skeptical eye?
Via Angry Arab, tout l’article est très intéressant.
Biased Reporting on Syria in the Service of War
►http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/04/20/biased-reporting-on-syria-in-the-service-of-war
8. The HRW report ignores the fact that Nusra rebels had control of the major chlorine gas producing factory and stockpile in northern Syria. As reported in a Time magazine article, the major chlorine gas producing factory in northern Syria was over-run and seized by Nusra rebels/terrorists in late 2012. The owner of the factory said “ if it turns out chlorine gas was used in the attack, then the first possibility is that it was mine. There is no other factory in Syria that can make this gas, and now it is under opposition control.” The factory owner reported there were about 400 steel cylinders of chlorine gas, one Ton each, captured by Nusra/Al Queda along with the factory.
The article included the following prescient comments, delivered when chlorine gas usage was first reported: “To Faris al-Shehabi, head of the Aleppo Chamber of Industry and a strong government supporter, it was obvious from Day One that the rebels had their eyes on the gas. “Why else would they capture a factory in the middle of nowhere? For the sniper positions?” he asks sarcastically while meeting TIME in Beirut, where he is traveling for business. “We warned back then that chemical components were in the hands of terrorists, but no one listened.”
Was HRW not aware of these important facts or did they think them not relevant?