• Colonialisme néerlandais - la noix de muscade
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nutmeg

    In order to obtain a monopoly on the production and trade of nutmeg, the Dutch East India Company (VOC) waged a bloody battle with the Bandanese in 1621. Historian Willard Hanna estimated that before this struggle the islands were populated by approximately 15,000 people, and only 1,000 were left (the Bandanese were killed, starved while fleeing, exiled, or sold as slaves). The Company constructed a comprehensive nutmeg plantation system on the islands during the 17th century.

    As a result of the Dutch interregnum during the Napoleonic Wars, the British invaded and temporarily took control of the Banda Islands from the Dutch and transplanted nutmeg trees, complete with soil, to Sri Lanka, Penang, Bencoolen, and Singapore From these locations they were transplanted to their other colonial holdings elsewhere, notably Zanzibar and Grenada. The national flag of Grenada, adopted in 1974, shows a stylised split-open nutmeg fruit. The Dutch retained control of the Spice Islands until World War II.

    Îles Banda / Moluques centrales
    https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%8Eles_Banda

    The Tiny Country that Never got Credit for the Hellhole We Live in Today
    https://seenthis.net/messages/1125840

    Genocide in the Spice Islands, The Dutch East India Company and the Destruction of the Banda Archipelago Civilisation in 1621
    https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-world-history-of-genocide/genocide-in-the-spice-islands/FB91452701BB794181164C59D08C659C#

    Japanese occupation of the Dutch East Indies
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_occupation_of_the_Dutch_East_Indies

    The Japanese occupation of the Banda Sea Islands, 1942
    https://warfarewest.x10host.com/dutcheastindies/banda_sea.html

    The Banda Sea Operations 1941-1942
    Banda Sea Operation
    T-Operation, July 29th, 1942

    Main Force - 24th Special Base Force led by Rear-Admiral Kouichiro Hatakeyama
    • 16th Cruiser Division with light cruiser Izusu
    • 24th Base Force, fleet torpedo boats Tomozuru and Syonan (Singapore) Maru #1
    • 2nd Southern Expeditionary Fleet, seaplane tender Sanyo Maru
    1st Attack Force was destined to Aru Islands. The force sailed from Babo, Dutch New Guinea.
    • 52nd Submarine-chaser Division with submarine-chaser Fukuei Maru #15, carrying one platoon of the 24th Special Base Force
    2nd Attack Force was destined to Kai Islands. The force sailed from Misool Island.
    • Minesweeper Division with minesweeper W8 (21st Special Base Force), carrying one company of the 3rd Yokosuka SNLF and minesweeper W16 (22nd Special Base Force), carrying one platoon of the 24th Special Base Force
    3rd Attack Force was destined to Babar Island and Tanimbar Islands. The force sailed from Ambon Island.
    • 5th Destroyer Division with destroyers Asakaze, Harukaze, Matsukaze of the 1st Southern Expeditionary Fleet
    • Submarine-chaser Division with submarine-chaser Ch5 (22nd Special Base Force), carrying one platoon of 3rd Yokosuka SNLF and submarine-chaser Ch21 (23rd Special Base Force), carrying one company of 24th Special Base Force
    • Transport Unit of the 2nd Southern Expeditionary Fleet consisted of 2nd Gunboat Division with gunboats Manyo Maru (2,904 tons) and Hokuyo Maru (4,216 tons)

    Depart

    Location

    Arrival

    Location

    Arrival

    Location
    departed at 1500,
    July 24th, 1942

    Ambon Island

    arrived at 1625,
    July 25th, 1942

    Misool Island

    arrived at 1030,
    July 26th, 1942

    Babo, Dutch New Guinea
    departed at 1200,
    July 28th, 1942

    Babo, Dutch New Guinea

    arrived at 1620,
    July 30th, 1942
    1st Attack Force



    arrived at 0400/0500

    Aru Islands
    departed at 0800,
    July 28th, 1942

    Misool Island

    arrived at 0430,
    July 31st, 1942
    2nd Attack Force



    arrived at 0400/0500

    Kai Islands
    departed at 1500,
    July 29th, 1942

    Ambon Island

    arrived at 0911,
    July 31st, 1942
    3rd Attack Force



    arrived at 0400/0500

    Tanimbar Islands








    arrived at 0310

    Babar Island

    You will note that in order to carry out this operation, the Japanese had to draw from various Base Forces. Also, their troops were widely dispersed. The Yokosuka 3d was at Ambon, while most of the 24th Base Force troops were either at Babo or Misool Island (north of Ceram Island). The surface units rendezvous at Ambon Island, sailed on the 24th of July 1942 for Misool Island (arrived there at 1625 on 25 July 1942) and at Babo (arrived there at 1030 on 26 July 1942). The X-day for the Japanese was July 30th at 4 locations:
    • 1st Attack Force departed Babo at 1200 on 28 July 1942 and arrived at the Aru Islands at 0400 on the 30th.
    • 2nd Attack Force departed Misool at 0800 on 28 July 1942 and arrived at the Kai Islands at 0400 on the 30th.
    • 3rd Attack Force departed Ambon Island at 1500 on 29 July 1942, split in two sections. Submarine-chaser Ch21 took the platoon of 3rd Yokosuka SNLF to Babar Island, arriving there at 0310 on 30 July 1942, while the main force of the 3rd Attack Force continued to Tanimbar, arriving at 0400 also on the 30th.

    Air operations were carried out by the group’s seaplane tender, Sanyo Maru. The 2nd Attack Force arrived at Ambon Island at 0430 on 31 July 1942, while the 3rd Attack Force didn’t get to Ambon Island until 0911. The 1stAttack Force arrived back at Babo, Dutch New Guinea at 1620 on 30 July 1942.

    In June 1942 a small civil unrest erupted at Dodo in the Aru Islands. This came about for several reasons. The war had upset the normal ship traffic in the region and this led to unemployment and food shortages. These islands had no KNIL military garrisons and therefore the Dutch decided in July 1942 to send several KNIL detachments to Toeal, Dodo and Saumlaki under the name of “Operation Plover”. The sending of these detachments led to the Japanese response in the form of the attacks starting on 30 July 1942.

    The Japanese occupation of Kai Islands, 1942

    The Toeal Detachment consisted of KNIL Lieutenant F. Hieronymus and 27 NCO’s and men. They arrived at Toeal, Kai Islands on 12 July 1942. The importance of Toeal lay in the fact that it was the administative centre for the region. The Japanese troops, one company of 3rd Yokosuka SNLF and one platoon of 24th Special Base Force, landed on the islands on 30 July 1942 and the KNIL Detachment defended itself for a while but it was soon driven into the jungle and managed to fight on there for a few days. Only Corporal Jered Malawau and a few men managed to escape by a sailing boat to Australia, while the rest fell into Japanese captivity. KNIL Lieutenant F. Hieronymus was also captured by the Japanese and taken to Ambon Island. He didn’t survive the war as he died later in the Japanese POW camp.

    The Japanese occupation of Aru Islands, 1942

    The KNIL sent 41 men to the small town of Dodo on the Aru Islands. The Japanese forces, one platoon of 24th Special Base Force, landed on the islands on 30 July 1942 and occupied them without any resistance.

    The Japanese occupation of Tanimbar Islands, 1942

    A KNIL Detachment was sent to Tanimbar Islands in July 1942 and it was stationed in the town of Saumlaki. The detachment consisted of KNIL Sargeant Julius Tahija and 12 men (13 men total) with 2 light machine-guns. The Japanese ships entered the bay at Saumlaki on July 30th at 0400 local time and consisted of 2 destroyers and probably a small transport ship. The Japanese used small boats to get to the jetty, so the boats they used were not landing craft. The Japanese filed in ranks on the jetty and wanted to march in close order into Saumlaki. At close range, Sargeant J. Tahija and his men opened fire with their two light MGs. The Japanese retreated to their boats leaving several dead on the jetty.
    On 31 July 1942 an Australian contingent (Plover Force - 1 officer and 29 men) tried to land in Saumlaki in order to reinforce the Dutch party, but the attempt failed. The Australian party left Darwin in the little vessels Southern Cross and Chinampa on 28th July 1942. Pulling in to the jetty at Saumlaki (Tanimbar Islands) early on the 31st the Chinampa was fired on from the shore and the commander of the Australian detachment on board was killed. Both vessels then returned to Darwin taking the whole of the Australian group with them.

    After the retreat, the Dutch came under naval gunfire which at daybreak became more accurate and caused some casualties. Then came a second attack on a wider front and the small Dutch force retreated before being overrun to a sailing ship and escaped to Australia as they were ordered to do. KNIL Sergeant Tahija arrived in Australia with only 6 men left. For his actions he was promoted and was decorated with the Militaire Willems Orde (MWO). Of the total of 82 men that the KNIL dispatched in operation “Plover” only 50 men returned to Australia.

    The Japanese occupation of Babar Island, 1942

    The Babar Island, located east of Timor Island, was occupied by the Japanese forces at 0310 on 30 July 1942 by a platoon of 3rd Yokosuka SNLF, transported by the submarine-chaser Ch21.

    The Japanese occupation of Banda Island, 1942

    On 23 February 1942, the Dutch authorities evacuated via air (from the island’s capital Bandaneira) two prominent Indonesian nationalist politicians, Dr. Mohammad Hatta (1902-1980) and Sutan Sjahrir (1909-1966), only a few minutes before the Japanese bombers started to bomb the island. Banda Island, located southeast of Ambon Island, was occupied by the Imperial Japanese troops on 8 May 1942.

    The Japanese occupation of Ceram Island, 1942

    At the beginning of war the KNIL Detachment in the town of Boela (Ceram Island) numbered approximately 100 men with 4 light machine-guns. They left Ceram Island after destroying the oil installations at Boela. They arrived on Ambon Island on 29 January 1942 and were employed for the defence of Ambon Island. The Japanese fleet consisting of 14 warships and 3 transport ships arrived on the shore of Boela on 31 March 1942. When they found that everything was destroyed they left, leaving behind a garrison of only 200 men. Despite all Dutch personnel being evacuated before the Japanese invasion, one report mentioned that the Japanese managed to bayonet one Dutch radio-operator, who stayed in the town. This force then dispatched a patrol of 15 men to arrest the Dutch magistrate at Geser, who had only 8 native policemen on his disposal, he evaded capture and escaped to Australia.
    Note In June 1943 Allied Intelligence estimated the Japanese strength at Saumlaki at 1,000 men.

    Note Japanese shipping at this time period was devoted to the Singapore / Rangoon reinforcement, and shipping going to Japan. As a result, the Japanese used two gunboats (Transport Unit) for transporting the company of 24th Special Base Force. They were medium sized, and barely adequate, not to mention that they were well armed for small merchant ships, so they couldn’t carry all the baggage.

    Note The Main Force, consisting of light cruiser Izusu and both torpedo boats had the task to block any attempt by the Australians from coming to assist. No actions occured.

    Note Tomozuru class: 1931 - Classified as fleet torpedo-boats, which were virtually small destroyers; 737 tons Displacement - 269 feet long. They had 2/4.7" Dual purpose guns as secondary armament. Main armament was 2 21" Torpedos and 48 depth-charges. They had a more prominent role as fast escorts until the Kiabokan’s came out. In 1944, the surviving units had their torpedos landed and depth-charges increased. Displacement rose to 1,043 tons.
    Bibliography . Article List . Geographic Names

    #Pays_Bas #histoire #capitalisme #colonialisme #génocide #navigation #guerre #Indonésie #noix_de_muscade

  • Dalle Alpi all’Africa. La politica fascista per l’italianizzazione delle “nuove province” (1922-1943)

    L’Italia fascista mise a punto strategie precise per consolidare il dominio sulle recenti acquisizioni territoriali: le regioni nord-orientali del Paese e le colonie in Africa settentrionale. In che modo il regime si impegnò a formulare e imporre la sovranità italiana su territori e popolazioni molto diversi fra loro, ma ugualmente estranei alla nazione?

    Come mostra #Roberta_Pergher attraverso lo studio di quanto avvenne in Alto Adige e in Libia, la politica di insediamento in quelle regioni non fu ideata per risolvere un problema di sovrappopolazione, bensì per rafforzare il controllo su aree di fatto non italiane, quando già si era affermato il principio di autodeterminazione dei popoli e imposizioni di stampo imperialista erano viste con sospetto dall’opinione pubblica internazionale.

    Pergher esplora le caratteristiche della politica di insediamento fascista, ma anche il modo in cui gli italiani presero parte o si opposero agli sforzi del regime per italianizzare i territori in cui l’autorità era contestata.

    https://www.viella.it/libro/9788833132792
    #Italie #colonisation #Italie_coloniale #Alpes #Haut-Adige #Libye #nationalisme #contrôle #autodétermination_des_peuples #italianisation

    #livre

    Le livre a été traduit de l’anglais:
    Mussolini’s Nation-Empire. Sovereignty and Settlement in Italy’s Borderlands, 1922–1943

    Roberta Pergher transforms our understanding of Fascist rule. Examining Fascist Italy’s efforts to control the antipodes of its realm - the regions annexed in northern Italy after the First World War, and Italy’s North African colonies - she shows how the regime struggled to imagine and implement Italian sovereignty over alien territories and peoples. Contrary to the claims of existing scholarship, Fascist settlement policy in these regions was not designed to solve an overpopulation problem, but to bolster Italian claims to rule in an era that prized self-determination and no longer saw imperial claims as self-evident. Professor Pergher explores the character and impact of Fascist settlement policy and the degree to which ordinary Italians participated in and challenged the regime’s efforts to Italianize contested territory. Employing models and concepts from the historiography of empire, she shows how Fascist Italy rethought the boundaries between national and imperial rule.


    https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/mussolinis-nationempire/CF0473B2EA56FEF20223BAFD2C90B440

    –-

    ajouté à la métaliste sur l’Italie coloniale:
    https://seenthis.net/messages/871953

  • Analyse de la (non-) fourniture d’#eau à #Gaza par Israël comparée à la situation en #Cisjordanie
    Thread by jan_selby on Thread Reader App – Thread Reader App
    https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1712540135932440742.html

    Jan Selby
    Subscribe
    @jan_selby
    15h • 18 tweets • 3 min read Read on Twitter
    Bookmark
    Save as PDF
    One thing I will comment on is this from Israeli Energy Minister Israeli Katz: ’For years we supplied #Gaza with ... water ... instead of saying thank you, they sent 1000s of human animals to slaughter, murder, rape & kidnap babies, women & elderly’ 1/
    I won’t comment on the last bit, just on the point about water - as I know something about it ...2/
    First, Israel hardly supplies any water to Gaza even in normal times. The big issues as far as water supplies are concerned at the moment are not these supplies from Israel (only 10 mcm annually) but no power supplies, the destruction of Gaza’s power plant, 3/
    and the wider destruction of water and wastewater infrastructure. No power is crucial - no power for water delivery or wastewater treatment. No power is much more important than no water - with electricity/fuel Gaza’s can desalinate and get water from wells. Without it not. 4/
    The question of why Gaza gets so little water from Israel is also worth commenting on, as it perfectly illustrate much about Israel-Gaza-West Bank dynamics. It’s not because it doesn’t need it. It obviously does - it doesn’t rain that much in Gaza, 5/
    and there’s no way it should be self-sufficient in water. The reason it doesn’t receive much water from Israel is that Israel’s water networks bypass it, going round it to supply Israeli communities to the east and south. Just as in relation to ’security’, so also water: ...6/
    longstanding Israeli policy has been to cut Gaza off and hope that it sinks into the sea. 7/
    In case you are wondering why Israel should even supply Gaza with water, then also consider this: thr situation on the West Bank is the exact reverse! 8/
    It rains plenty in most of the West Bank, and as s result the West bank has plentiful groundwater resources. But there, Palestinians are forced to import water from Israel! The city of Ramallah now gets all of its water supplied by pipe from Israel. Annaul rainfall in Ramallah 9/
    is higher than London’s! But Israeli restrictions on Palestinian well drilling in the West Bank have meant that Palestinians have turned to Israel for piped supplies. And in this case, Israel has been happy to oblige. 10/
    There thus exists a crazy situation (even before recent events) where Gaza, which has meagre water resources and cannot be self-sufficient, hardly receives any water from Israel, whereas the West Bank, with its heavy rains, is compelled to import it - and uphill! 11/
    As final points, it’s also worth noting that this water isn’t just ’given’ by Israel, in two regards. First, it is paid for. The water received by the West Bank and Gaza alike is paid for by the Palestinian Authority. And second, ...12/
    much of this is water which, first in 1948-9 and then 1967 and by Israeli settlers, has been taken by force. Water is the conflict in microcosm. 13/
    This and related stuff is discussed in my book published last year. I don’t want to use this to self-publicise. But here it is anyway. With Gaza’s power plant on the cover, it seems appropriate to share right now. end 14/

    Divided Environments
    Cambridge Core - International Relations and International Organisations - Divided Environments
    https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/divided-environments/0621F20A4464C4E05BF76980BBF25D3F
    One last thing, as I should have been clear on why Israel is happy to supply water to the West Bank. 3 reasons: first, because Israel has got plenty of water and is happy to find markets for it; 15/
    Second because the water is supplied to West Bank Palestinian communities through water networks constructed for Israeli settlements; West Bank settlements and Palestinian towns and villages there have both been integrated into Israel’s national water supply network, ... 16/
    as part of its policy of de facto annexation. And third, because Israeli policy has been to try to keep the PA and Palestinian elites in the West Bank happy, to co-opt them, e.g. by providing a basic amount of water. The 2nd and 3rd factors do not apply in the case of Gaza. 17/
    As with water, so with the conflict’s overall political geography: Israeli policy to the West Bank has been to colonise and co-opt; whereas to Gaza it has been to isolate, imprison. And as a footnote: Whatever happens next, it’s hard to imagine this continuing. End 18/

  • Life in soil: The psychology of soil in California

    Isabelle Legeron travels to California, a part of the world whose soil holds a complex history. She meets the indigenous Californians reviving ancestral methods of tending to the land, and the soil scientists exploring the impact of colonisation and agriculture on the soil of the Golden State.

    With indigenous Californian land steward Redbird (Pomo/Paiute/Wailaki/Wintu), director of the California Indian museum Nicole Lim (Pomo), indigenous ecologist Dr Melissa Nelson (Anishinaabe/Métis/Norwegian), indigenous educator Sara Moncada (Yaqui/Irish), professor Paul Starrs (USA) and soil scientists Suzanne Pierre (India/Haiti/USA), Kenzo Esquivel (Japanese/Mexican/USA) and Yvonne Socolar (USA).

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/w3ct43cn

    #sol #terre #Californie #peuples_autochtones #colonisation #colonialisme #géographie_du_vide #paysage #agriculture #maïs #USA #Etats-Unis #végétation
    #podcast #audio

    ping @_kg_

  • Le Moyen Âge et ses migrants
    http://www.laviedesidees.fr/Miri-Rubin-Cities-Strangers-Making-Lives-Medieval-Europe.html

    À propos de : Miri Rubin, Cities of Strangers. Making Lives in Medieval Europe, Cambridge. Forestiere, foreign ou stranger, forain ou étranger : les mots désignent celui qui n’est pas d’« ici ». En étudiant la figure de l’étranger de l’an mil à 1500, Miri Rubin analyse les régimes d’hospitalité et d’exclusion et, au-delà, la définition même de ce qu’est une ville.

    #Histoire #identité #Moyen_Âge #exclusion #migration #Etat
    https://laviedesidees.fr/IMG/docx/20200528_migrantsmoyenage.docx
    https://laviedesidees.fr/IMG/pdf/20200528_migrantsmoyenage.pdf

  • Réflexion émise en 2017 concernant les #prix astronomiques des #médicaments aux #Etats-Unis
    https://seenthis.net/messages/634973#message634999

    "Ce qui est de premier abord curieux c’est que les compagnies d’assurance, quand même « puissantes », n’opposent pratiquement pas de résistance."

    Why Do Americans Pay More for Drugs ? by Robin Feldman - Project Syndicate
    https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/america-pharma-companies-weak-price-competition-by-robin-feldman-

    At the center of the system are “pharmacy benefit managers” (PBMs), who represent health-insurance plans in drug-price negotiations with pharmaceutical companies. Because health insurers pay PBMs based on the discounts they secure, these intermediaries should in theory try to negotiate the lowest possible drug prices for their clients. But in practice, established drug companies offer PBMs financial incentives to favor their higher-priced drugs and block cheaper competitors.

    "#auto-régulation" #capitalisme

  • Et tout le monde s’en fout #1 - Les femmes - - YouTube
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDDxAIhHt08

    Mon frère m’a fait passé cette video qui est sympa. Par contre il y a un truc qui m’intrigue et c’est plutot une question pour @simplicissimus
    à 1:23 il est question de l’accusation de « Gronderie » et l’incrimination judiciaire de Mégère.

    J’ai jamais entendu parlé de cette histoire de gronderie et je sais pas ce qu’impliquait le fait d’être « mégère » d’un point de vue pénal. Le videaste dit que ca existait jusqu’au XXeme siècle en France.

    Dans les commentaires une personne demande des sources car comme pour moi les moteurs de recherche ne donnent absolument aucun résultat. Le vidéaste lui dit que ca viens de ce livre : Pourquoi les hommes mentent et les femmes pleurent https://www.amazon.fr/Pourquoi-hommes-mentent-femmes-pleurent/dp/2876916959
    qui me semble assez suspect vu le sexisme du titre et la ref à pourquoi les hommes viennent de mars et ce genre de bouquins. Le résumé du livre sur Amazone me donne pas confiance sur la qualité de leurs sources :

    Pourquoi les hommes mentent ? Les femmes pleurent-elles autant qu’on le dit ? Qu’est-ce qui rend les femmes complètement hystériques à propos des hommes ? Pourquoi les hommes ne peuvent pas vivre sans la télécommande dans les mains ? Pourquoi font-ils tant d’histoires lorsqu’il s’agit d’aller faire les courses ? Pourquoi les femmes parlent-elles tellement de leurs problèmes ? Pourquoi exagèrent-elles et ne vont-elles pas directement à la conclusion ? Pourquoi veulent-elles connaître tous les détails d’une affaire ? Et pourquoi les hommes passent-ils tellement de temps avec leurs copains sans rien connaître de leur vie privée ? Qu’est-ce qui fait tourner la tête des hommes chez les femmes ? Et la tête des femmes à la vue d’un homme ? À ces importantes questions, Allan et Barbara Pease apportent des réponses très nouvelles basées sur une combinaison unique : l’expérience d’un mari et d’une épouse, une expertise fondée sur une observation professionnelle des relations humaines, et last but not least un incomparable humour.

    Comme gogol me donne aucune réponse à part la vidéo d’origine et que j’ai jamais entendu parlé de cette gronderie dans toute la littérature féministe que j’ai lu, et que ca m’étonnerai que j’ai oublié un truc aussi énorme, ainsi que les féministes françaises, ca me semble faux, mais bon j’ai un doute.

    Vu mon intérêt pour les #mégères et le #mégèrisme ca m’intéresse ces « gronderies » et « mégères » pénales. Si @simplicissimus tu trouve des trucs là dessus je suis preneuse, et bien sur si quelqu’une ou quelqu’un a des infos vous êtes bienvenu·e·s aussi.
    #gronderie #femmes #histoire #féminisme #historicisation

  • Europe can learn from Australia’s border policy. But not by listening to Abbott

    Tony Abbott is wrong that European leaders can solve the refugee crisis by mimicking his policies. Here are the real lessons Europe can learn from Australia

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/sep/19/europe-can-learn-from-australias-border-policy-but-not-by-listening-to-
    #modèle_australien #asile #migrations #réfugiés #Australie #Europe