https://www.alternet.org

  • How the Media Portrays Black and White Drug Users Differently | Alternet
    https://www.alternet.org/how-media-portrays-black-and-white-drug-users-differently?src=newsletter10

    How the Media Portrays Black and White Drug Users Differently
    NYT’s sympathetic coverage of white moms struggling with opioids contrasts with its hysteria over “crack babies”
    By Joyce McMillan / Salon
    May 28, 2018, 5:14 AM GMT

    The lives of the women profiled in the story are complex and the writer makes great effort to mute her judgments and witness the mothers nurturing their children. Because of this thoughtful observing, the women are shown in their wholeness. But the writer also uses descriptors that highlight the whiteness of her subjects. She highlights Alicia’s blond hair, a flaxen-haired child, and another’s hazel eyes. In a way, this is as much a story about the redemptive power of whiteness as it is about opioid use.

    The New York Times, like many major publications that have reported on the opioid epidemic, has a history of covering societal drug use. Often, publications reference the differential response to the opioid epidemic and the way that race has influenced political response. Coverage of the opioid epidemic alludes to the “cultural overreaction” to the “crack baby” and the panic over crack use in general.

    They recall the dehumanization of black women and their children, who did not benefit from the gentle words of a famed novelist. It is apt that the light shone on the New York Times, a publication that proffered racist and sensationalized journalism depicting black people as sex-crazed cocaine addicts and black children born to mothers who used cocaine as broken and irredeemable. It is not hyperbolic to claim that the New York Times had a role in the creation of the modern war on drugs, one it now deems to be a failure.

    The New York Times and other major national publications fanned the flames of the drug war, and have now pivoted their coverage to protect white victims and whiteness. Telling stories in a way that allows people to exist beyond their drug use is not the issue; it should be standard practice. What is surprising is that the New York Times and other publications have not done the work of looking through the archives to see the harm they have caused historically and presently – especially the harm done to black mothers.

    Black motherhood is a high-risk endeavor and little empathy is given to those who fall short of societal expectations. The New York Times and other major media publications are not totally responsible for the systemic racism that leaves black motherhood at the societal fringe, but they are crucial part of the mechanism. I don’t know how the media can atone for their actions in shaping the narratives of the drug war, but acknowledging the harm they caused is a start.

    #Opioides #Racisme #Médias

  • ’These Aren’t People — They’re Animals’: Trump Unleashes Racist Anti-Immigrant Rant During Meeting on Sanctuary Cities | Alternet
    https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/these-arent-people-theyre-animals-trump-unleashes-racist-anti-immigrant-ra

    “We’re taking people out of the country, you wouldn’t believe how bad these people are,” he said. “These aren’t people, they’re animals.”

    Denying the humanity of certain groups — as well as wildly exaggerating their rates of committing crimes, as the president frequently does — is a rhetorical technique often used to promote racist and bigoted ideas.

    #Trump #Fascisme_même_pas_rampant

  • The Internet Is Designed for Corporations — Not People | Alternet
    https://www.alternet.org/internet-designed-corporations-not-people

    Of course, these sites present privacy policies to users to notify them how their information will be used. They ask users to “click here to accept” them. The problem is that these policies are nearly impossible to understand. As a result, no one knows what they have consented to.

    But that’s not all. The problem runs deeper than that. Legal scholar Katherine Strandburg has pointed out that the entire metaphor of a market where consumers trade privacy for services is deeply flawed. It is advertisers, not users, who are Facebook’s real customers. Users have no idea what they are “paying” and have no possible way of knowing the value of their information. Users are also unable to protect themselves, as opting out of sites like Facebook and Google isn’t viable for most.

    As I have argued in an academic journal, the main thing notice and consent does is subtly communicate to users the idea that their privacy is a commodity that they trade for services. It certainly does not protect their privacy. It also hurts innocent people.

    The internet’s hostile architecture

    Lawrence Lessig, one of the leading legal scholars of the internet, wrote a pioneering book that discussed the similarities between architecture in physical space and things like interfaces online. Both can regulate what you do in a place, as anyone who has tried to access content behind a “paywall” immediately understands.

    In the present context, the idea that the internet is at least somewhat of a public space where one can meet friends, listen to music, go shopping, and get news is a complete myth.

    Unless you make money by trafficking in user data, internet architecture is hostile from top to bottom. That the business model of companies like Facebook is based on targeted advertising is only part of the story. Here are some other examples of how the internet is designed by and for companies, not the public.

    Consider first that the internet in the U.S. isn’t actually, in any legal sense, a public space. The hardware is all owned by telecom companies, and they have successfully lobbied 20 state legislatures to ban efforts by cities to build out public broadband.

    The Federal Trade Commission has recently declared its intention to undo Obama-era net neutrality rules. The rollback, which treats the internet as a vehicle for delivering paid content, would allow ISPs like the telecom companies to deliver their own content, or paid content, faster than (or instead of) everyone else’s. So advertising could come faster, and your blog about free speech could take a very long time to load.

    Copyright law gives sites like YouTube very strong legal incentives to unilaterally and automatically, without user consent, take down material that someone says is infringing, and very few incentives to restore it, even if it is legitimate. These takedown provisions include content that would be protected free speech in other contexts; both President Barack Obama and Senator John McCain campaigns had material removed from their YouTube channels in the weeks prior to the 2008 elections.

    Federal requirements that content-filtering software is installed in public libraries that receive federal funding regulate the only internet the poor can access. These privately produced programs are designed to block access to pornography, but they tend to sweep up other material, particularly if it is about LGBTQ+ issues. Worse, the companies that make these programs are under no obligation to disclose how or what their software blocks.

    In short, the internet has enough seat dividers and decorative leaves to be a hostile architecture. This time, though, it’s a hostile information architecture.

    #Internet #Facebook #Economie_numérique

  • A New York Times Reporter Is Making a Stunning Admission That She Became an ’Unwitting Agent of Russian Intelligence’ | Alternet
    https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/new-york-times-reporter-making-stunning-admission-she-became-unwitting-age

    New York Times reporter Amy Chozick’s just-released memoir, Chasing Hillary, offers a detailed and direct admission that major media outlets played into Russian President Vladimir Putin’s hands by devoting obsessive coverage to hacked Democratic emails during the 2016 presidential campaign. It’s a striking acknowledgment, given how defensive the Times and its campaign journalists have generally been about their work. But rather than writing off Chozick’s mea culpa as proof of personal weakness or a one-off error, journalists should take it as a warning. The 2016 election may have been the first time that journalists found themselves the tools of a foreign government aimed at undermining American democracy. It won’t be the last.

    "If you get email correspondence of newsworthiness from any source, you have an obligation to publish it, assuming it’s true, which in this case it was. You have an obligation to publish it,” Baquet said on NPR. “And if a powerful figure writes emails that are newsworthy, you’ve just got to publish them.”

    Baquet presents a false choice between hiding vital information from the public and behaving exactly as media outlets did during the 2016 election — one that seems to appeal to other Times political reporters. This formulation ignores a third option — that the failure wasn’t that news outlets had published emails stolen by a hostile source, but that the scope of their coverage greatly exceeded the actual news value of the emails. The hacked email coverage is one of a series of cases in which poor editorial judgment led to an overwhelming focus on Clinton email-related purported scandals instead of pressing policy issues.

    #Fake_news #Manipulation #Elections_USA

  • A Peace Movement Blooms at Google | Alternet
    https://www.alternet.org/peace-movement-blooms-google

    Three-thousand Google employees have signed a letter protesting the internet giant’s contract with the Defense Department to develop artificial intelligence in order to analyze imagery collected by drones.

    The employees are calling on Google CEO Sundar Pichai to cancel the project immediately and to “enforce a clear policy stating that neither Google nor its contractors will ever build warfare technology.”

    Google is collaborating with the Pentagton’s Project Maven, which was established in April 2017 “to deploy computer algorithms to war zones by year’s end, “according to one Defense Department press release. The focus of the project is “38 classes of objects that represent the kinds of things the department needs to detect, especially in the fight against the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.”
    Report Advertisement

    The protest is a signal moment in the global campaign against lethal autonomous weapons, otherwise known as killer robots. The increasingly plausible of specter of warfare in which machines automatically target and kill people without human control has given rise to an international movement to ban such weapons. The Google antiwar letter shows the movement has arrived in Silicon Valley.

    Since 2014, the nations that have signed the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) have convened biannual conferences of experts to study the issue. Academics, policymakers and activists have found widespread agreement on the importance of controlling autonomous weapons, yet failed to reach consensus on how to do it.

    #Google #Guerre #Warfare #Techno_manifestation

  • Rollin’ With the Dragon: Opioids Are Gaining Popularity in the Club Scene | Alternet
    https://www.alternet.org/drugs/rolling-dragon-opioids-gaining-popularity-club-scene

    The EDM scene has long been known for drug use, but the researchers warn that the turn to opioids is a dangerous trend that should not be ignored.

    “We’ve always known that electronic dance music party attendees are at high risk for use of club drugs such as ecstasy or Molly, but we wanted to know the extent of opioid use in this population,” said Palamar, the study’s lead author and an associate professor of population health at NYU School of Medicine.

    The most popular prescription opioid reported in this scene was Oxycontin, which, like many prescription opioids, is used to relieve pain, but also produces euphoric effects, inducing relaxation and happiness. Following close behind were Vicodin, Percocet, codeine, and Purple Drank. About 15 percent of opioid users reported snorting them, while 11 percent reported injecting them, both forms of ingestion more likely to result in dependence.

    People who had already used opioids reported a much higher propensity for using them again than did people who had never used them. Among previous users, nearly three-quarters (73.4 percent) said they would do them again, while only about 6 percent of non-users said they would try them if offered.

    #Opioides #Dance_music

  • Facebook Turned Our Economy Into a Spying Operation | Alternet
    https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/our-economy-based-spying

    George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton sold us on the idea that we no longer needed a manufacturing economy in the U.S. because the internet was coming and it would provide entirely new business models.

    Now we’ve seen what that new economy looks like: spying for sale.

    Facebook takes all the information you give them, which they then use to create profiles to sell advertising to people who want your money or your vote.

    Your internet service provider, with former Verizon lawyer and now head of the FCC Ajit Pai having destroyed net neutrality, will soon begin (if they haven’t already started) tracking every single mouse click, reading every email, and checking out every one of your online purchases to get information they can sell for a profit.

    Your “smart" TV is tracking every show you watch, when and for how long and selling that information to marketers and networks.

    And even your credit card company is now selling your information—what have you bought that you’d rather not have the world know?

    To paraphrase Dwight Eisenhower’s Cross of Iron speech, this is not a real economy at all, in any true sense. It’s a parody of an economy, with a small number of winners and all the rest of us as losers/suckers/“product.”

    While it’s true that Facebook’s malignant business model may well provide a huge opportunity for a competitor to offer a “$3 a month and we don’t track you, spy on you, or sell your data” plan (or even for Facebook to shift to that), it still fails to address the importance of privacy in the context of society and law/rule-making.

    We cannot trust corporations in America with our personal information, as long as that information can make them more and more money. Even your doctor or hospital will now require you sign a form allowing them to sell your information to third parties.

    It’s been decades since we’ve had a conversation in America about privacy. What does the word mean? How should it be applied?

    Just this simple transparency requirement would solve a lot of these problems.

    Business, of course, will scream that they can’t afford compliance with such an onerous requirement. Every time they sell the fact that you love dogs but have a cat allergy and buy anti-allergy medications, they’ll only make a few cents per sale, but it’ll cost them more than that to let you know what part of you and your collective body of information they sold to the allergy medicine manufacturers.

    And that may well be true. It will decrease the profitability of companies like Facebook whose primary business model is spy-and-sell, and will incrementally reduce the revenue to medical groups, credit card companies, and websites/ISPs who make money on the side doing spy-and-sell.

    #Facebook #Médias_sociaux #Vie_privée #Economie_influence

  • The Sexist, Racist Implications of the ’Walk Up, Not Out’ Movement | Alternet
    https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/sexist-racist-implications-walk-not-out-movement?akid=16850.2663896.0nM9pI

    The student walkout itself has drawn protest from those who disagree that gun control is the solution. The "Walk Up, Not Out” movement is led by parents who believe more “kindness” among students, rather than gun control legislation, will end gun violence. Those at the helm of Walk Up have shared ideas such as increased school security measures that would effectively transform schools into prisons and could have negative consequences for students of color. They have also expressed support for mental health resources while ignoring how scapegoating the mentally ill fails to address the real problem. The real problem is guns and insufficient regulation of gun owners who have access to weapons that kill hundreds in minutes (the mentally ill are far more likely to be victims than perpetrators of gun violence).

    Walk Up’s ultimate premise is that the responsibility for ending school violence should be placed on the shoulders of young people who are in school to learn, while demanding nothing of the policymakers who are actually in positions to make change. The movement seems to place the blame for shootings on those who are purportedly complicit in the bullying and marginalizing of students who go on to become mass shooters.

    Wald also addressed this in her post: “This argument only applies to crimes overwhelmingly committed by white boys. Their crimes are tragic betrayals of an underlying innocence that is never attributed to black boys selling drugs on the corner.”

    In 2015, a 14-year-old Muslim boy was handcuffed and taken into custody for building a clock. In 2014, 12-year-old Tamir Rice was shot and killed by police for brandishing a toy gun in a playground. In 2013, 17-year-old Trayvon Martin was shot by a vigilante for walking on the streets at night wearing a hoodie. We have no problem with accepting black and brown people as dangerous, but we pull out all the stops to humanize mass shooters hailing from white communities. Women are disproportionately affected by gun violence, yet they are pressured to proactively stop the hypermasculine violence that targets them. Walk Up’s message of telling young people to just “be nicer” to one another ignores the implications this language has for young women and the pressure it places on them.

    A number of statistics exemplify the connection between gun violence directed at women or initiated by people with records of abusing women. Every year, hundreds of women are killed for rejecting men; more than 1,600 women are killed by men every year. Annually, an average of 760 Americans are killed with guns by spouses, ex-spouses or intimate partners, and the majority of these cases involve guns and collateral damage that claims the lives of other victims. Domestic violence victims are five times more likely to be killed when their abusers have access to a gun.

    #Racisme #Sexisme #Controle_armes #Violence #Gun_control

  • The Battle of 1498 | Alternet
    https://www.alternet.org/personal-health/battle-1498

    Hepatitis C is a blood virus that affects 3.5 million Americans and kills more of them than every other virus combined. So when $62 million in government basic research led to the direct-action drug sofosbuvir, which successfully treats the disease, Hep C advocates thought global eradication might be at hand.
    Report Advertisement

    Then something awful happened: the patent-and-profit system worked exactly as designed.

    In 2011, the California-based drug giant Gilead bought the small bio-med company then in the process of bringing sofosbuvir through trials. When Gilead introduced sofosbuvir to market a few years later, it came with a price tag upwards of $100,000; even with discounts, the drug was priced well beyond the reach of most people. It also strained and busted Medicaid budgets across the country.

    Gilead and Janssen, the other company selling patented Hep C treatments, have since made more than $70 billion selling the new Hep C drugs, which happen to be incredibly cheap to produce. How cheap? So cheap, one study estimates they can be produced for between $62 and $216; another study, conducted at Liverpool University, places the cost below $100.

    Khanna continued, “The Hep C drugs present a pretty simple moral issue that highlights the need for reform. When the vast majority of scientific research in this country is being done at universities with NIH funding supported by taxpayer money, we shouldn’t be privatizing the gains. Millions of people need these drugs. We need to prioritize the public good.”

    #Big_Pharma #Hépatite_C #Brevets #Propriété_intellectuelle

  • La démocratie électorale sous la menace des armes : de la Turquie aux USA

    Deux articles aujourd’hui éclairent d’un jour sombre la pratique même de l’élection dans deux pays phare, Turquie et USA... mais la menace sur le système représentatif est bien plus large.

    Le président Erdogan verrouille le système électoral turc
    http://abonnes.lemonde.fr/proche-orient/article/2018/03/15/le-president-erdogan-verrouille-le-systeme-electoral-turc_5271596_32

    A dix-huit mois des législatives et de la présidentielle, le Parlement a approuvé une réforme qui doit garantir le maintien au pouvoir de l’homme fort d’Ankara.

    Avec 357 sièges sur 550 au Parlement, l’alliance n’a eu aucun mal à faire voter les amendements. A la faveur de ceux-ci, les autorités nomment désormais les responsables des bureaux de vote, dont la localisation peut être modifiée pour raison de sécurité.

    Encore plus déroutant, tout électeur peut appeler les forces de l’ordre à intervenir sur les lieux du scrutin s’il se sent lésé d’une manière ou d’une autre, une prérogative jusqu’ici réservée au seul responsable du bureau de vote. « Le risque de voir les élections se dérouler sous la menace des armes pourrait mettre la pression sur les votants », a dénoncé le député Ugur Bayraktutan, du Parti républicain du peuple (CHP, kémaliste).

    Le plus intéressant (ce que malheureusement ne fait pas le journaliste du Monde, qui traite les sujets un par un au lieu de repérer le pattern global) est de comparer avec la loi de juillet 2017 aux Etats-Unis qui dit :

    SECRET SERVICE PROTECTION AT POLLING PLACES.
    This section shall not prevent any officer or agent of the United States Secret Service from providing armed protective services authorized under section 3056 or pursuant to a Presidential memorandum at any place where a general or special election is held. [emphasis added]– H.R. 2825, section 4012

    Voir pour cela l’article
    There’s a New Law That Could Allow the President to Send Armed Secret Service to Polling Places
    https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/law-could-allow-president-send-armed-secret-service-polling-places

    Le parallèle est inquiétant, qui montre que les élections ne sont plus vraiment le modèle d’une démocratie conquérante, mais un enregistrement de personnes auto-désignées, des successeurs autorisés, ou des médiatico-compatibles. Il nous faut réfléchir vite à cette évolution mondiale, au delà des cas de la Russie, du Président à vie Xi Jiping ou des fasciste Narendra Modi (Inde) ou Abdel Al Sissi (Egypte). En Europe, nous sommes aussi menacés par la dissolution du modèle électoral (cf Pologne, Hongrie...) comme de sa contestation post-élection (cf. Grèce, Catalogne...).

    #Elections #Démocratie_en_danger #Armes_dans_les_bureaux de vote

  • How Big Pharma Is Corrupting the Truth About the Drugs It Sells Us | Alternet
    https://www.alternet.org/drugs/drug-companies-are-funding-investigational-studies-influence-their-results

    Remember how appalled we felt as a society when we discovered that, for so long, we had been mistakenly taking Big Tobacco’s word that cigarettes are harmless? Rinse and repeat with lobbyists for Big Alcohol fear-mongering about legal weed. And again and again with a panoply of consumer-level commodities and goods.

    Nowadays we have all these familiar worries, but about our drugs and medications instead. It’s become so bad that there’s now reason to believe Big Pharma is also colluding to poison the well of scientific inquiry.

    The truth is, there are many examples of private industry paying for positive press from the scientific community. When you look closer at our spending priorities as a nation, it’s not entirely difficult to see why. As public funding for the sciences has fallen away, many scientists have had to pivot toward more consistent—and ethically fraught—sources of funding and stability as surely as politicians who, for want of public election funding, get buoyed by billionaires at $100,000-per-plate fundraising dinners.

    The Fall of Accountable Science

    Between 2011 and 2012, the New England Journal of Medicine published more than 70 “original studies” of newly FDA-approved and experimental drugs. Of these 70-plus reports:

    Sixty received direct pharmaceutical company funding.
    Fifty were written or co-written by a current employee of a pharmaceutical company.
    Thirty-seven had lead writers who had, at some point, received speaking fees or other compensation from the subject of the study.

    Up until about the 1980s, the federal government was the primary financier of scientific research in the world of medicine. In the ’60s and ’70s, the federal government had a 70 percent share of scientific research. In 2013, that number finally dropped below the 50 percent mark.

    #Conflit_intérêt #Big_Pharma #Pubications

  • Black Tar, Black Markets : Denver’s Opioid Crisis and the Search for a Progressive Fix | Alternet
    https://www.alternet.org/drugs/black-tar-black-markets-denver-opioid-crisis-search-progressive-fix

    https://www.alternet.org/sites/default/files/640px-denvercp.jpeg

    Un passage sur les bibliothèques dans un article sur les « salles de shoot ». Paniquant, isn’t it ?

    The Denver Public Library, searching for a humane solution, took action. To prevent any additional tragedies, the library trained many of its staff to use naloxone (brand name Narcan), the antidote to an opioid overdose. Over 300 staff now carry naloxone across the library’s different branches.

    “Let me be clear,” Rachel Fewell, the Central Library Administrator of the Denver Public Library, told me. “Drug use of any kind in our library is illegal and a violation of our policies. But when we see it, we try to treat the people using our library as individuals and with respect. We try to connect them with the resources and services they need.”

    Fewell explained that the library has social workers and peer navigators on its staff who try to help guests deal with problems such as addiction or homelessness. Guests can access these services for free during daily drop-in hours. She told me that the library has successfully reversed 15 overdoses since they equipped staff with naloxone last year, and there have been no more deaths.

    #Opioides #Bibliothèques #Société_du_soin #Care

  • How Your Brain Is Wired to Just Say ’Yes’ to Opioids | Alternet
    https://www.alternet.org/drugs/how-your-brain-wired-just-say-yes-opioids-opiates-heroin-fentanyl

    Brain scientists have known for decades that opioids are complex and difficult substances to manage when it comes to addiction. The National Institute on Drug Abuse reports that more than 20 percent of the patients prescribed opioids for chronic pain misuse them, and between 8 and 12 percent of those who use prescription opioids develop a use disorder.

    Given how addictive these drugs are, doctors should have foreseen the looming danger of prescription opioids long before their use was liberalized for non-cancer related pain in the 1990s. Opioid abuse has instead ballooned over the last decade. In 2014, federal officials estimated nearly 2 million people in the United States suffer from substance use disorders related to prescription opioid pain medicines. Each day, more than 1,000 people are treated in emergency rooms for misusing prescription opioids, the CDC reports.

    Brain science is only one part of an addiction problem, but, I believe an important one deserving of more consideration than we’ve shown in past drug abuse crises. NIH Director Francis S. Collins has recognized this in his leadership of the medical and scientific response to the opioid use epidemic.

    The NIH is taking important steps in building a public-private partnership that will seek scientific solutions to the opioid crisis, including the development of non-opioid painkillers. Collins has committed his agency’s resources in this quest, including implementing the Fast Track and Breakthrough Therapy designations that exist to facilitate development and expedite review of products that address an unmet medical need. The agency is calling for more emphasis on non-drug alternatives for pain, such as medical devices that can deliver more localized analgesia.

    #Opioides #Neurosciences

  • New Map Reveals Which Countries Are Most Likely to Survive Climate Change | Alternet
    https://www.alternet.org/environment/new-map-reveals-which-countries-are-most-likely-survive-climate-change?aki

    Cette carte est intéressante : ce sont les pays qui historiquement ont mis en place le système de consommation des fossiles ayant conduit à la situation actuelle et aux perspectives radieuses qu’elle porte pour demain... qui sont les mieux protégées des changements climatiques !!!

    Bref, encore une fois, les pays riches ont exporté leurs problèmes chez les autres. On a parlé de coloniqation (XIXe siècle), d’impérialisme (XXe siècle)... quel mot trouver pour cette vampirisation du monde au profit d’un « mode de vie » et d’une inconscience majeure comme celle que nous vivons actuellement ?

    While it’s true that climate change will impact the entire global community in some way, this map clearly shows which countries are likely to be the most (and least) affected. The pressure is now mounting for global leaders to come up with an effective solution to stop climate change before it is too late and nations begin to succumb to the disastrous consequences of a warming world.

    #Climat #Néo_impérialisme #Inégalités_climatiques #Cartographie

  • Magic Mushrooms Fight Authoritarianism | Alternet
    https://www.alternet.org/drugs/magic-mushrooms-fight-authoritarianism-psilocybin-psychedelics

    Psychedelic drugs have been associated with anti-authoritarian counter-cultures since the 1960s, but a new study suggests using psilocybin, the psychedelic compound in magic mushrooms, actually makes people less likely to embrace authoritarian views, PsyPost reports. The study conducted by the Psychedelic Research Group at Imperial College London was published in the journal Psychopharmacology.

    While other studies have linked the use of psychedelics to a greater sense of oneness with nature, openness to new experiences and political and social liberalism, this is the first to provide experimental evidence their use can leading to lasting changes in these attitudes.

    In the study, researchers gave two oral doses of psilocybin to seven participants suffering from treatment-resistant major depression while a control group of seven healthy subjects did not receive psilocybin. Researchers surveyed participants about their political views and relationship to nature before the sessions, one week after the sessions, and 7-12 months later.

    Subjects who received the psilocybin treatment showed a significant decrease in authoritarian attitudes after treatment, and that reduction was sustained over time. They also reported a significant increase in a sense of relatedness to nature.

    "Before I enjoyed nature, now I feel part of it. Before I was looking at it as a thing, like TV or a painting… But now I see there’s no separation or distinction—you are it,” one participant told researchers.

    Subjects who had not received psilocybin did not exhibit significant changes in attitudes.

    #Psychédéliques #Psylocybine #Pharmacologie

  • Tom Petty’s Family Publicly Releases Cause of Death to Help Forward Opioid Crisis Discussion | Alternet
    https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/tom-pettys-family-publicly-releases-cause-death-help-forward-opioid-crisis

    Following a pattern familiar to families throughout the country, Petty’s overdose coincided with a pain-related medical issue. Fentanyl, a synthetic opiate prescribed for pain, was identified by name in the statement.

    “As a family we recognize this report may spark a further discussion on the opioid crisis and we feel that it is a healthy and necessary discussion and we hope in some way this report can save lives. Many people who overdose begin with a legitimate injury or simply do not understand the potency and deadly nature of these medications,” the statement continued.

    #Opioides #Crise_opioides #Tom_Petty

  • Does Bitcoin Have a Future? | Alternet
    https://www.alternet.org/local-peace-economy/future-bitcoin

    Well, for one thing, as bitcoin usage has grown, the math problems computers must solve to make more bitcoin (the “mining”) have become more and more difficult—a wrinkle intended to control the currency’s supply. That’s good in the sense that limiting the supply helps to preserve the underlying value of the currency. The bad news is that “mining” for currency is almost as environmentally unfriendly as traditional mining, because of the high amounts of computing power required, which guzzle energy. You wouldn’t believe it, but bitcoin’s fatal flaw is an electricity problem. In fact, there is a “bitcoin energy index” that shows that each bitcoin transaction requires the same amount of energy used to power nine houses. There are many pejoratives one can ascribe to central bankers, but “environmental vandal” is usually not one of them.

    Of course, many of the libertarian champions of bitcoin and its ilk are in the climate change skeptics’ camp, so it’s unclear that this fact would bother them. It’s doubtful they would welcome “green initiatives” if it meant the end to their precious bull market in cryptocurrencies. But the truth is that the aggregate computing power required to sustain Bitcoin makes it, all by itself, unviable in the developing world, where electricity shortages are a fact of life. At the same time, what good is a currency if it creates a resource constraint that hinders global growth and prosperity? The appeal of most monetary instruments is that they avoid the inflexibility associated with the old gold standard or fixed exchange rate systems. This inflexibility prevented governments from introducing policies that generated the best outcomes for their domestic economies.

    some speculative bubbles, such as the railways, or the dotcom boom, do not have as malign an impact. When these kinds of manias exhaust themselves, at least society is left with innovations scattered across the landscape for our use. But bubbles that take root in the very credit system itself (such as the housing mess) leave behind a literal wasteland.

    It’s early days, but so far, bitcoin’s cataclysmic fall does not seem to be triggering any systemic concerns, which would suggest, thankfully, that it has not yet taken root in the credit system. But again, what’s to like? Anything that enables participants to exchange a legal tender dollar or some other real asset for a cryptocurrency, which has no intrinsic value or yield, is environmentally toxic, trades in cyberspace, outside of the regulated world of banks and financial payments is a recipe for fraud. And haven’t we had our fill of that for a while?

    #Bitcoin #Monnaie_numérique

  • IDF on Twitter: “In memory of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., take this day to be kind to others https://t.co/paqaAdKoie
    https://mobile.twitter.com/IDFSpokesperson/status/952957645987696640

    #FBI on Twitter: “Today, the FBI honors the Rev. Martin L. King Jr. and his incredible career fighting for civil rights. #MLKDAY https://t.co/9UEulHmL8a
    https://mobile.twitter.com/FBI/status/821037660613398529

    #chutzpah #sans_vergogne #Etats-Unis #Israel #MLK