février 2018 - asile.ch

#décès #migrations #asile #réfugiés #Maroc #Forteresse_Europe #Espagne #mourir_aux_frontières #enquête #Tarajal #Espagne #Ceuta #Melilla

#asile #livre #migrations #réfugiés #France #procédure_d'asile #protection #soupçon #doute #preuve

#MNA #mineurs_non_accompagnés #France #protection #asile #migrations #réfugiés #mineurs #enfance #enfants

#solidarité #asile #migrations #réfugiés #livre #France #accueil

Les solidarités face aux flux migratoires : quelles marges de manœuvre en France aujourd’hui ?

Au-delà de l’#aide immédiate apportée aux migrants, la préoccupation humanitaire concerne l’adéquation des politiques publiques au respect des droits humains fondamentaux et des principes de l’aide. Aujourd’hui en France, les acteurs de l’aide sont sujets à une pression croissante, ce qui contraint notamment leurs valeurs et leurs modes opératoires, et interroge sur l’existence de marges de solidarité. Alors que le projet de loi sur l’immigration et l’asile est en cours de discussion, quel cadre éthique et quel espace de travail peuvent être définis entre les autorités et les acteurs de la solidarité pour offrir une assistance et une protection de base aux personnes migrantes, actuellement présentes sur le territoire national ?

Sommaire :

https://i.imgur.com/Otcvi15.png

▻http://www.urd.org/Les-solidarites-face-aux-flux
#rapport #droits_humains #droits_fondamentaux #délit_de_solidarité

#MNA #mineurs_non_accompagnés #Suisse #prise_en_charge #inégalités #cantons #fédéralisme #asile #migrations #réfugiés #mineurs #enfants #enfance

cc @i_s_ @isskein
#asile #migrations #réfugiés #accord_UE-Turquie #Turquie #externalisation

Lien vers le rapport de Teresa Bevivino :
L’externalisation de la politique migratoire de l’UE : le cas de l’accord avec la Turquie
▻http://www.sireas.be/publications/analyse2016/2016-13int.pdf

#asile #migrations #réfugiés #UE #EU #Europe #accord_UE-Turquie #contrôle_migratoire #hotspots #ingérence

EU-Turkey – Deconstructing the deal behind the statement

This month marks the two-year anniversary of the ignominious EU-Turkey deal. Although rebranded and formalised as a “Statement”, in part to avoid the parliamentary and judicial scrutiny that an international agreement entails, at its heart there is a deal, an agreement for the mutual benefit of the two parties.

►https://www.ecre.org/weekly-editorial-deconstructing-the-deal-behind-the-statement

Two years into the EU-Turkey ‘deal’ – taking stock

Two years have passed since the EU and Turkey sealed a ‘deal’ to halt large-scale migration to Europe. As numbers remained low, the public eye tended to turn to other theatres. New developments, however, call for a fresh look at the ‘EU-Turkey deal’, from controversies about the accession process to Ankara’s military involvement in Syria. This blog post takes stock of the costly failure of the refugees swapping mechanism and the success of the aid package, and analyses perspectives for progress concerning the EU-Turkey Statement’s unfulfilled promises: a reform of the Customs Union, visa liberalisation and large-scale resettlement. In total, the practical result looks quite traditional: EU cash in return for border control.

▻http://www.delorsinstitut.de/en/all-publications/two-years-into-the-eu-turkey-deal-taking-stock
#bilan #rapport

Accord UE-Turquie sur les migrants : quel bilan, deux ans après la signature ?

Il y a deux ans, l’Union européenne et la Turquie signaient un accord pour mettre fin à la crise des réfugiés en Europe. C’est aujourd’hui l’heure du bilan.

▻http://www.rfi.fr/emission/20180318-accord-migratoire-union-europeenne-turquie-quel-bilan-deux-ans-apres

Accord UE-Turquie sur les migrants : quel bilan, deux ans après la signature ?

Il y a deux ans, l’Union européenne et la Turquie signaient un accord pour mettre fin à la crise des réfugiés en Europe. C’est aujourd’hui l’heure du bilan.

▻http://www.infomigrants.net/fr/post/8141/accord-ue-turquie-sur-les-migrants-quel-bilan-deux-ans-apres-la-signat

EU-Turkey deal: the burden on refugees in Greece

The statistic success of the EU-Turkey deal in lowering the influx of migrants to Greece also has another face, a far-reaching “crisis of solidarity”: desperate conditions for people blocked in camps on the Egean islands; what has been described as “a mental health emergency”; and the opening or reopening of more dangerous routes. Marianna Karakoulaki, who knows the island camps well and has travelled the Balkan route, takes stock for us from Greece of two years of EU-Turkey deal.

▻http://openmigration.org/en/analyses/eu-turkey-deal-the-burden-on-refugees-in-greece

cc @isskein @i_s_

Switzerland: Landmark ruling on asylum seekers’ right of appeal against Dublin III transfers brings Swiss court in line with CJEU practice

The Federal Administrative Court of Switzerland (FAC) has departed from its previous case law concerning the right of asylum seekers to challenge the incorrect application of responsibility criteria under the Dublin III Regulation, thereby aligning the court’s practice with recent jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).

In a landmark ruling released on 12 January 2018, the FAC approved the appeal of an Iraqi family whose asylum application in Switzerland had been dismissed on the grounds that they had previously filed an application for asylum in Germany. The State Secretariat for Migration (SEM) had concluded that Germany was the State responsible for processing the application after receiving confirmation of acceptance from the German authorities. The family had lodged a complaint against this decision, asserting that the responsibility criteria set forth in the Dublin III Regulation had been incorrectly applied as the SEM had missed the three-month deadline for submitting a take-charge request to the German authorities. The SEM had thus become responsible for the examination of the family’s asylum requests, and could not return the family to Germany.

The basis for this decision lay in the controversial question of the admissibility of appeals regarding the incorrect application of responsibility criteria in the Dublin III Regulation. Previously, the FAC had distinguished between directly applicable and indirectly applicable responsibility criteria, with complaints relating to the latter being dismissed outright because these criteria were technical in nature and did not affect the individual legal positions of asylum seekers.

However, in its judgments in Ghezelbash and Karim, the CJEU concluded that the right to an effective remedy under Article 27(1) of the Dublin III Regulation covers an asylum seeker’s right to appeal against a transfer decision by pleading the incorrect application of one of the criteria for determining responsibility.

The Swiss judges stated in their judgment that Switzerland is not, in principle, bound by the jurisprudence of the CJEU concerning the Dublin III Regulation. However, they added that all signatories to the Regulation are obliged to strive towards the uniform application and interpretation of the legislation. To this end, under established case-law, departures from CJEU practice may only be made if there are strong grounds for doing so. In this case, the FAC concluded that no such grounds existed.

▻http://www.asylumineurope.org/news/15-01-2018/switzerland-landmark-ruling-asylum-seekers%E2%80%99-right-appeal-aga
#Dublin #délais_dublin #suisse #jurisprudence