/news

  • Iran war live: Houthis seize 2 islands, Saudis intensify air attacks | Donald Trump News | Al Jazeera
    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2026/9/14/iran-war-live-oman-says-hormuz-talks-with-iran-gulf-states-postponed

    Pro-Yemen gov’t forces claim Iranian and Lebanese experts helped manage Houthi campaign

    The Yemeni National Resistance Forces, a government-aligned military faction, says Iranian and Lebanese experts helped manage the Houthi military operation along the Red Sea coast.

    The operations were planned months in advance and were executed on the order of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), according to spokesman Sadiq Dwaid.

    He posted on social media that the National Resistance Forces’ casualties since August 9 had exceeded 2,000.

    “We were losing hundreds of fighters daily between killed and wounded,” Dwaid said.

  • Israeli minister threatens to revoke filmmakers’ citizenship over Gaza film | Cinema News | Al Jazeera
    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/14/israeli-minister-threatens-to-revoke-filmmakers-citizenship-over-gaza-fil

    Israeli Culture Minister Miki Zohar has said that he will move to revoke the citizenship of filmmakers Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor after their documentary on Israel’s genocide in Gaza, NAZA, won the Special Jury Prize at the Venice Film Festival.

    In an X post on Sunday, Zohar called the documentary “vile” and its win at the film festival “shocking”. He accused the filmmakers of harming the country “just to get applause from antisemites around the world”.

    The minister said that Abraham and Szor’s actions “constitute treason against the state”.

    “As culture minister, I will act immediately to revoke the Israeli citizenship of these despicable creators for treason against the state,” he wrote.

  • Clash Report sur X :
    https://x.com/clashreport/status/2097935005221605692

    C’est intéressant parce que le mot d’ordre chez al-jazeera (arabe et anglais) était d’annoncer depuis plusieurs jours l’écrasement total des Houthis par l’ « armée régulière yéménite ».

    À un certain moment le journaliste, interrogeant « l’expert » yéménite de la chaîne, a mis en avant une avancée des Houthis, ce dernier a répondu qu’elle n’avait aucune importance, sans expliquer pourquoi ; le journaliste s’en est contenté.

    Yemen’s Houthis have captured Mokha and swept roughly 2,600 km² of western Yemen in a rapid coastal offensive.

    The advance targeted the western Taiz and southern Al-Hudaydah governorates, cutting through multiple districts in what’s being described as one of the fastest territorial shifts in the war in years.

    Government and National Resistance Forces (Tariq Saleh’s units) withdrew or collapsed across a broad front, reportedly falling back toward Aden.

    Named locations taken include Hays, Al-Khawkhah, Al-Wazi’iyah, Mawza, and the strategically important Khalid ibn al-Walid military camp.

    The offensive culminated in seizing Mokha (Al-Makha), the main government-held port city on that stretch of the Red Sea coast.

    Why this is significant?

    Mokha sits roughly 60–75 km north of the Bab al-Mandab Strait, one of the world’s most critical shipping chokepoints.

    The city had been in government/coalition hands since early 2017 and served as a key hub for Tariq Saleh’s National Resistance Forces.

    Houthi control there puts them physically closer to the strait and international shipping lanes they’ve already been disrupting.

    It also removes the main government military and logistical anchor on the western coast.

  • Medicine shortages grow in Iran as US tightens sanctions, blockade | US-Israel war on Iran News | Al Jazeera
    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/9/medicine-shortages-grow-in-iran-as-us-tightens-sanctions-blockade

    L’état terroriste génocidaire sioniste n’y est pas pour rien.

    Washington’s years-long “maximum pressure” sanctions have hobbled the financial and logistics networks facilitating procurement of medical imports, leading to significantly higher costs despite existing humanitarian exemptions.

    The shortages have worsened since the US and Israel’s war on Iran, which began in February, damaged and destroyed some 44 pharmaceutical and medical equipment companies. According to Iranian officials, some 50 industry workers were also killed or wounded.

    One of the main pharmaceutical firms bombed during the war was Tofigh Daru, which is owned by Iran’s largest pension fund.

    Maryam Farahani, the company’s director of sales, told Al Jazeera that Israeli air strikes had struck all of its research and production lines, including those producing peptide and narcotic active ingredients as well as anticancer drugs.

    “Our target audience are predominantly cancer patients and people with chronic diseases,” Farahani said. “Some of the medicine we used to produce were exclusive.”

    […]

    “It is truly regrettable that many of the places targeted across Iran were research sites, and what leads to the development of a country,” she said.

  • SCO slams attacks, sanctions on Iran: Key takeaways from Bishkek summit | Politics News | Al Jazeera
    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/9/1/sco-slams-attacks-sanctions-on-iran-key-takeaways-from-bishkek-summit

    Leaders of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) have signed a joint statement condemning the US and Israel’s war on Iran and Western sanctions on some of their members, after a two-day summit in Kyrgyzstan’s capital, Bishkek.

    The joint statement, called the “Bishkek Declaration”, was signed by Chinese President Xi Jinping, his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, among other leaders of SCO member nations. The SCO consists of Russia, China, India, Pakistan, Iran, Belarus, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and the Kyrgyz Republic.

  • UK has billions in contracts with firms tied to illegal Israeli settlements | Occupied West Bank News | Al Jazeera
    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/28/uk-has-billions-in-contracts-with-firms-tied-to-illegal-israeli-settlemen

    At least 17 companies linked to illegal Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank hold United Kingdom public-sector contracts worth more than 2.1 billion pounds ($2.85bn), an Al Jazeera investigation reveals.

    […]

    Companies owned by Motorola Solutions, the United States technology and communications giant, account for more than 1.7 billion pounds ($2.3bn) of the total – the vast majority through its British subsidiary Airwave Solutions. Other contracts we reviewed are held by firms within four other corporate groups including Heidelberg Materials, a German multinational building materials company; the French engineering group Egis; the Spanish train manufacturer CAF and Chinese conglomerate Fosun.

  • Des militants de « Palestine Action » accusés de « terrorisme » suite à une manifestation contre le complexe de golf de Trump

    Ces accusations font suite à l’action de sept militants de « Palestine Action » qui ont tagué le complexe écossais pour protester contre la position du président américain sur Gaza.

    Par la rédaction d’Al Jazeera | Publié le 28 août 202628 août 2026
    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/8/28/pa-activists-face-terror-charges-over-trump-golf-resort-protest-report

    Des militants de Palestine Action, accusés d’avoir vandalisé un parcours de golf écossais appartenant au président américain Donald Trump, ont été inculpés pour des faits de « terrorisme », selon certaines informations.
    La possibilité de peines « de niveau terroriste » a été rapportée vendredi par The Guardian et le New York Times. Les sept militants, qui avaient tagué des messages de soutien à Gaza et arraché du gazon au complexe de golf Turnberry de Trump, dans l’Ayrshire, l’année dernière, ont été inculpés de dégradation volontaire « ayant un lien avec le terrorisme », ont rapporté les journaux. (...)

  • Al Mayadeen obtains copy of Article 8 of Sharm El-Sheikh Agreement | Al Mayadeen English
    https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/al-mayadeen-obtains-copy-of-article-8-of-sharm-el-sheikh-agr

    Al Mayadeen has obtained an exclusive copy of Clause 8 of the Sharm El-Sheikh Agreement implementation paper, revealing details of the proposed roadmap for Gaza’s post-war security arrangements.

    According to the document, the process of inventorying and storing heavy weapons, military production sites, weapons depots, and tunnels would begin only after the remaining obligations under the Sharm El-Sheikh Protocol are fulfilled and the designated National Committee enters Gaza.

    The implementation paper states that the process would be carried out gradually by the National Committee according to a sequential timetable to be completed within 14 days. The timeline could be extended by decision of the International Verification Committee following the approval of all parties to the agreed roadmap.

    Process linked to phased Israeli withdrawal
    The document links the implementation of the security arrangements to a phased Israeli withdrawal from areas under Israeli control in Gaza.

  • How Volker Turk won new UN rights chief term despite US, Israel opposition | United Nations News | Al Jazeera
    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/7/25/how-volker-turk-won-a-new-term-as-un-rights-chief-despite-israel-oppositi

    The UN General Assembly voted 144-10 to grant Turk a new four-year term, despite objections from the US, Israel and Russia.

  • “Les violences”

    En Cisjordanie, un Israélien et quatre Palestiniens tués dans des affrontements
    https://www.lemonde.fr/international/article/2026/07/24/en-cisjordanie-un-israelien-et-quatre-palestiniens-tues-dans-des-affrontemen

    Les violences en Cisjordanie se sont fortement intensifiées depuis le début de la guerre dans la bande de Gaza, en octobre 2023.

    • Four Palestinians killed as Israeli settlers raid occupied West Bank town | Israel-Palestine conflict News | Al Jazeera
      https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/7/24/four-palestinians-killed-as-israeli-settlers-raid-occupied-west-bank-town

      The town of Tal, which is close to the illegal Israeli settlement of Havat Gilad, was attacked by Israeli settlers earlier on Friday, local and security sources said. The settlers opened live fire before clashes broke out, as Palestinians tried to protect their homes.

      Essam Saifi, a local leader in the Palestinian Fatah party from Tal, told the Reuters news agency ⁠in a phone call that about 25 to 30 Israeli settlers initially attacked the eastern ⁠area of the town and tried to break into ⁠two houses there. The residents came out to confront them and the settlers opened fire.

      Half an hour later, Saifi said, the Israelis returned ‌and attacked the western part of the town, striking a child with a weapon. This caused chaos, and the Israeli military ‌arrived and ‌started shooting, along with the settlers, he added.

      The Israeli army, however, said it had dispatched troops to the area near the Havat Gilad following what it called “an attack on Israelis hiking in the area”.

      The military claimed a Palestinian had stolen a weapon from local security personnel and fired at the Israeli settlers.

      #MSM

  • Plus grande incursion depuis des mois : plus de 3 228 colons prennent d’assaut la mosquée Al-Aqsa
    http://french.wafa.ps/Pages/Details/245321

    Le département du Waqf islamique à Jérusalem, a annoncé que 3 228 colons extrémistes ont pris d’assaut l’esplanade de la mosquée Al-Aqsa, lors des incursions matinales, coïncidant avec la commémoration de la « destruction du Temple », sous haute protection des forces d’occupation israéliennes.

    Le gouvernorat de Jérusalem a déclaré dans un communiqué de presse publié ce matin, jeudi, que parmi les intrus figuraient le ministre israélien de la Sécurité nationale, Itamar Ben-Gvir, le député extrémiste Nissim Vitori et le député du Likoud, Amit Halevi. Ces derniers ont accompli des rituels talmudiques dans les cours de la mosquée et hissé le drapeau israélien lors de l’incursion, un acte provocateur qui constitue une violation du statut historique et juridique de la mosquée.

  • Iran war live: Yemen’s Houthis announce maritime blockade of Saudi Arabia | Donald Trump News | Al Jazeera
    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2026/7/20/iran-war-live-us-military-carries-out-another-wave-of-strikes-on-iran

    Houthis see Saudi maritime embargo as an ‘opportunity’
    The Houthis appear to be using the announcement of a maritime embargo targeting Saudi Arabia to “redraw the rules” while regional powers are under pressure, an analyst says.

    Zeidon Alkinani, founding director of the Arab Perspectives Institute, told Al Jazeera there is “very clear” messaging in the announcement.

    There was “no mention of Iran” suggesting the Houthis are acting to exploit what they see as a window of opportunity while both Saudi Arabia and the United States are pre-occupied with Iran. “They’re taking it as an opportunity to redraw the rules imposed on them before,” he said.

    Negotiations with the Houthis could be “easier” than talks involving either the US or Iran, which remain in direct confrontation. “From a Houthi perspective they are controlling Yemen, which is in the GCC orbit,” he said.

    Alkinani said direct negotiations with the Houthis would now make sense.

  • Israël annonce la mise en œuvre des « zones-pilotes » dans le sud du Liban, malgré les accords conclus à Washington - RFI
    https://www.rfi.fr/fr/moyen-orient/20260718-isra%C3%ABl-annonce-la-mise-en-%C5%93uvre-des-zones-pilotes-dans-le-sud

    L’annonce du retrait israélien de deux localités au nord du Litani ne répond que partiellement aux attentes du Liban, qui se plaint du non-respect par Israël des arrangements conclus sous l’égide des États-Unis. 

    L’une des deux localités citées par les médias israéliens, Zaoutar al-Gharbiyé, n’est pas occupée par les troupes israéliennes.

    L’armée libanaise s’y est d’ailleurs déployée dès vendredi 17 juillet, ainsi que dans cinq autres villages, où les Israéliens entendent appliquer le projet des « zones pilotes ». Les militaires libanais ont installé des barrages et intensifié leurs patrouilles dans ces localités dans l’objectif de démontrer qu’elles ne sont pas occupées par Israël, mais sont déjà sous le contrôle de l’État libanais.

    Cela signifie que le dispositif expérimental des « zones-pilotes » ne peut pas être appliqué à ces villages et devrait être mis en œuvre dans d’autres régions réellement occupées, ce que les Israéliens refusent d’envisager à ce stade.

    Une source officielle libanaise qualifie l’annonce israélienne de « trompe-l’œil » visant à donner l’impression qu’Israël respecte ses engagements.

    #Liban
    #foutage_de_gueule

  • Hamidreza Azizi sur X :
    https://x.com/HamidRezaAz/status/2077870482330698185

    Les États-Unis se préparent-ils à une invasion terrestre de l’#Iran ?

    Le schéma croissant des frappes américaines contre le sud de l’Iran ces derniers jours – en particulier au cours des dernières heures – pourrait indiquer une stratégie graduelle visant à préparer le terrain pour un éventuel déploiement de forces terrestres. Une telle opération, si elle devait se concrétiser, pourrait viser à s’emparer du contrôle de la bande côtière sud de l’Iran afin d’éliminer le contrôle iranien sur le détroit d’Ormuz.

    Les rapports indiquent que les récentes frappes américaines ont visé plusieurs ponts et liaisons ferroviaires dans le sud de l’Iran. Dans le même temps, des attaques contre des aéroports ont été signalées. Ces actions pourraient avoir été destinées à perturber la logistique et la mobilité des forces militaires iraniennes dans le sud. Des rapports supplémentaires suggèrent également des frappes contre des pétroliers à Bandar Abbas.

    Parallèlement, des attaques dans le Sistan-et-Baloutchistan, dans le sud-est de l’Iran, ont visé la 88e Division blindée de l’armée iranienne, ainsi que des frappes similaires contre des positions de la 92e Division blindée dans le Khouzistan, à l’ouest-sud.

    Certains analystes interprètent ces opérations comme une tentative de dégrader les capacités militaires de l’Iran le long de ses principaux axes sud, dans le but de réduire les risques associés à tout futur déploiement terrestre.

    Dans le même temps, dans ce qui semble être un schéma récurrent, les frappes américaines ont continué à cibler des installations militaires iraniennes, des missiles, des drones et des radars, ainsi que des installations de la marine de la Garde révolutionnaire islamique (IRGC) le long de la côte sud de l’Iran sur le golfe Persique.

    Prises ensemble, ces évolutions suggèrent de plus en plus un mouvement américain graduel mais persistant vers une possible opération terrestre dans le sud de l’Iran. En d’autres termes, la campagne pourrait aller au-delà d’une simple dégradation de la capacité de l’Iran à menacer la navigation dans le détroit d’Ormuz. Elle pourrait plutôt indiquer que Washington considère le contrôle de la bande côtière sud de l’Iran comme la seule solution définitive au défi du détroit d’Ormuz.

    Si une telle approche existe, elle irait bien au-delà des idées antérieures centrées sur la saisie de l’île de Kharg pour couper les exportations pétrolières de l’Iran ou l’occupation d’îles dominant le détroit pour sécuriser le trafic maritime. Cependant, compte tenu de la longueur de la côte sud de l’Iran – environ 1 800 kilomètres – et de la considérable profondeur stratégique du pays, établir un contrôle complet nécessiterait probablement des centaines de milliers de troupes 1. De plus, même la capture de ces zones ne se traduirait pas nécessairement par la capacité à maintenir un contrôle à long terme.

    Quoi qu’il en soit, les indicateurs actuels suggèrent que nous pourrions approcher de l’escalade la plus significative dans la confrontation États-Unis-Iran depuis février, motivée par l’échec de Washington à atteindre ses objectifs stratégiques. D’un autre côté, comme noté précédemment, les actions de l’Iran jusqu’à présent n’ont pas non plus réussi à présenter un obstacle significatif à cette trajectoire graduelle. Une alternative pour Téhéran pourrait être de se tourner vers la cible d’infrastructures économiques régionales – un mouvement qui élargirait considérablement la portée du conflit et mènerait à une catastrophe à l’échelle régionale.

    1

    [..,] une autre option consisterait en des opérations amphibies limitées contre les îles + la fourniture d’une couverture aérienne aux groupes insurgés ethniques pénétrant dans le pays depuis le sud-ouest et le sud-est.

    • Hamidreza Azizi sur X :
      https://x.com/HamidRezaAz/status/2078266326955569312

      […]

      Du côté américain, les rapports indiquent que plusieurs avions de ravitaillement en vol ont été redéployés d’Europe vers la zone d’opérations du CENTCOM. Beaucoup de ces actifs avaient quitté la région après le cessez-le-feu, rendant leur retour notable au milieu des tensions renouvelées.

      Parallèlement, la portée géographique des frappes américaines semble s’élargir davantage. En plus des zones précédentes dans le sud, les attaques signalées ont atteint Lar dans la province de Fars et Yazd dans l’Iran central – des zones abritant certaines des bases de missiles de l’Iran.

      L’Iran, quant à lui, semble élargir son propre ensemble de cibles. Les Gardiens de la révolution islamique (IRGC) ont revendiqué avoir frappé des installations de drones américains et un centre d’IA à Bahreïn, prétendument utilisé pour soutenir les opérations de ciblage américaines, tout en avertissant qu’ils cibleraient de plus en plus les actifs économiques, technologiques et industriels liés aux intérêts américains dans toute la région.

      Cela marque un changement potentiellement important. Plutôt que de se concentrer principalement sur des cibles militaires, Téhéran signale que les infrastructures associées aux intérêts économiques et technologiques américains pourraient désormais être considérées comme des cibles légitimes si les attaques contre l’Iran se poursuivent.

      Les développements maritimes deviennent également plus préoccupants. Des sources iraniennes ont rapporté qu’un navire battant pavillon thaïlandais a été ciblé après avoir tenté de traverser le détroit d’Ormuz sans coordination avec l’Iran, tout en affirmant plus tard que deux pétroliers ont heurté des mines dans le détroit et pris feu.

      Qu’on puisse ou non vérifier indépendamment toutes ces allégations, elles soulignent les risques croissants pour la navigation commerciale. Même des mines précédemment déployées pourraient avoir un impact significatif sur le trafic maritime.

      Le développement signalé le plus significatif est
      peut-être la frappe iranienne sur la base aérienne Prince-Sultan en Arabie saoudite après que des avions de ravitaillement américains ont prétendument opéré depuis cette base. Cela représente la première attaque iranienne signalée contre une installation américaine en Arabie saoudite depuis le cessez-le-feu d’avril.

      Il est également notable que, la veille, l’Iran a annoncé une attaque sur la base d’al-Tanf en Syrie. Certains analystes iraniens ont interprété cette frappe comme un avertissement au gouvernement syrien de ne pas intervenir au Liban contre le Hezbollah.

      Cela suggère que Téhéran pourrait mettre de côté une partie de la retenue qui a façonné ses réponses antérieures. Au cours des dernières semaines, les attaques iraniennes se sont concentrées principalement sur Bahreïn, le Koweït et la Jordanie, avec des frappes bien plus limitées contre les Émirats arabes unis, le Qatar et Oman. Ce calcul pourrait maintenant changer, Téhéran semblant croire que ces attaques n’ont ni modifié les calculs américains ni changé l’équilibre militaire sur le terrain.

      Les rapports indiquant que d’autres ponts et infrastructures de transport dans le sud de l’Iran continuent d’être ciblés ont également attiré l’attention. Comme mentionné hier, de nombreux analystes iraniens interprètent ces frappes comme faisant partie d’un effort graduel pour dégrader la mobilité et la logistique dans le sud de l’Iran, jetant potentiellement les bases d’options militaires futures impliquant des troupes au sol.

      Du point de vue iranien, cela ne signifie pas nécessairement qu’une opération terrestre américaine est imminente. Cependant, les attaques répétées sur les infrastructures de transport s’inscrivent dans un schéma plus large de préparation du champ de bataille qui ne peut être ignoré. En conséquence, la question pourrait de plus en plus être celle du « quand » plutôt que du « si ».

      Parallèlement, l’Iran poursuit des opérations sur d’autres fronts. L’armée iranienne a annoncé des opérations supplémentaires contre des groupes insurgés kurdes dans le Kurdistan irakien, revendiquant la mort de plusieurs commandants et la destruction de plusieurs installations.

      Il y a également des rapports non vérifiés selon lesquels les Houthis préparent des mesures qui pourraient affecter la navigation à travers le détroit de Bab el-Mandeb. Bien que ces allégations restent incertaines, elles contribuent aux perceptions en Iran selon lesquelles le conflit pourrait de plus en plus s’étendre au-delà de la région immédiate du golfe Persique.

      Globalement, Téhéran semble conclure que son niveau précédent d’« engagement modéré » n’a pas généré une dissuasion suffisante. En conséquence, il est de plus en plus prêt à élargir à la fois la portée géographique de ses opérations et les catégories de cibles qu’il est prêt à frapper.

      Que cela reflète l’effondrement des attentes entourant un cadre négocié ou simplement un effort pour restaurer la dissuasion reste incertain. Ce qui devient cependant de plus en plus évident, c’est que les deux parties augmentent progressivement les enjeux, accroissant le risque que le conflit entre dans une phase plus large et significativement plus dangereuse.

    • Trump a du prévoir que les pays du Golfe importeront de l’eau en bouteille d’une entreprise appartenant à un copain.

      Iran war live : 10,000 without water after US hit ; fire at Kuwait water site | US-Israel war on Iran News | Al Jazeera
      https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2026/7/18/iran-war-live-us-and-iran-exchange-attacks-for-7th-consecutive-night

      Iran’s national water company says some 10,000 people across 20 villages are without water after overnight US attacks.

      Iran’s army says it has hit US assets in Bahrain, Jordan and Kuwait following the latest round of US strikes.

      Kuwait says Iranian attacks have targeted two power and water plants.

    • U.S. and Iran Edge Closer to All-Out War After U.S. Service Members Killed: Live Updates - The New York Times
      https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/07/19/world/iran-war-strikes-trump-hormuz

      In a sign that the fighting could intensify, American officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity on Sunday said that the United States was sending more warplanes to the Middle East, a move that was in the works even before the soldiers’ deaths.

      The United States was sending more warplanes to the Middle East, according to American officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity on Sunday, another sign the Trump administration may soon further escalate its strikes against Iran.

      Air Force F-16 fighter jets from Germany and stealthy F-35 jets from Britain were being sent to the Middle East, according to the officials, who were not authorized to publicly discuss operational matters. Additional aerial refueling aircraft were also on the way.

    • Hamidreza Azizi sur X : https://x.com/HamidRezaAz/status/2079520908213936187

      À propos d’un article, qui relève l’efficacité de la stratégie militaire iranienne consistant en une “débasification” (les frappes iraniennes sur les bases US dans la région).

      Azizi :

      Cependant les capacités militaires de l’Iran lui-même – en particulier dans le sud – subissent également une sévère pression.

      Aujourd’hui, par exemple, le ministre iranien des Communications a déclaré que les frappes avaient temporairement perturbé les communications entre le centre et certaines îles iraniennes dans le golfe Persique avant qu’elles ne soient rétablies. C’est une situation hautement dangereuse. La concentration des attaques américaines sur les capacités ISR iraniennes le long de la côte sud, combinée aux forces navales que les États-Unis conservent encore dans la zone d’opérations du CENTCOM, pourrait créer de sérieuses vulnérabilités à long terme.

      Ce risque pourrait être aggravé par la volonté croissante des alliés américains dans le CCG de coopérer plus étroitement avec Washington, motivée par la perception accrue de la menace créée par les attaques iraniennes. À terme, ces dynamiques pourraient générer de grands défis pour la capacité du gouvernement iranien à maintenir un contrôle efficace sur le sud.

      Comme je l’ai mentionné précédemment, il existe déjà des préoccupations à Téhéran selon lesquelles les États-Unis pourraient se préparer à une opération terrestre visant à prendre le contrôle de la côte sud de l’Iran. Cela ne signifie pas qu’une telle opération est imminente. Même les évaluations les plus alarmantes suggèrent que, si elle devait avoir lieu, elle aurait lieu le plus plus probablement à l’automne ou pendant l’hiver, après les élections de mi-mandat américaines et lorsque les conditions météorologiques seraient plus favorables. Néanmoins, c’est un facteur qui doit être pris au sérieux.

      Comme je l’ai également soutenu à plusieurs reprises, l’asymétrie centrale réside dans le fait que le territoire iranien est directement ciblé, tandis que l’Iran frappe des bases américaines dans la région. Cela crée des seuils de douleurs politique et sociétale très différents.

      Bien sûr, même une opération réussie visant à dégrader les capacités iraniennes dans le sud n’aurait pas nécessairement un impact décisif sur la capacité en missiles de l’Iran. Cette capacité est largement dispersée à travers le pays et devient de plus en plus précise. L’Iran conserverait donc une capacité significative à infliger des dommages aux forces américaines, en particulier si elles devaient entrer sur le territoire iranien.

      Mon point plus large est que même une stratégie de « débasification » réussie ne produirait pas nécessairement des dividendes stratégiques immédiats pour l’Iran. C’est pourquoi je continue à parler de l’absence d’une grande stratégie claire pour la victoire et, tout aussi important, pour gérer la phase post-victoire.

      Tout bien considéré, la seule option véritablement efficace pour les deux parties semble être un retour à la diplomatie et la poursuite d’un règlement négocié.

    • Hamidreza Azizi :
      https://x.com/HamidRezaAz/status/2080277298628988977

      Signs of a Major Escalation in the U.S.-#Iran War

      – Multiple developments over the past several hours suggest that the U.S. war on #Iran may be approaching a significant escalation.

      – Last night’s U.S. strike on the Shalamcheh border crossing between Iran and Iraq has been interpreted as a possible preparatory move for the deployment of special operations or ground forces. Alternatively, the strike may have been intended to facilitate the advance of armed insurgent groups.

      – In the same context, the drone strike on the Al-Abdali border crossing between Iraq and Kuwait was likely carried out by Iran or its Iraqi allies in an effort to disrupt the U.S. logistical corridor linking the two countries.

      – Meanwhile, reports indicate that shelters have been opened at multiple locations across Israel. Similar measures preceded earlier escalations, including the 12-Day War and the 40-Day War, suggesting that Israeli authorities are preparing for possible Iranian missile attacks.

      – France and the United Kingdom have also reportedly evacuated their embassies in Iran as of today.

      – Trump, for his part, has declared that he holds Iran responsible for Houthi attacks on shipping in the Red Sea and the Bab al-Mandab Strait. This statement could provide a pretext for intensifying U.S. strikes against Iran in response to future Houthi operations.

      – The warning should be viewed alongside Trump’s earlier statement on Wednesday that any future Iranian attack on shipping in the Strait of Hormuz would be met with a U.S. strike on an Iranian bridge or power plant. He has also indicated that a U.S. attack on Iran’s underground nuclear facilities at “Pickaxe Mountain” is inevitable.

      – At the same time, the United States appears to be reducing its military presence at bases closer to Iran, including in Qatar. Open-source reporting also points to a large-scale transfer of military equipment from the United States and Europe to Israel, along with increased activity by reconnaissance, command-and-control, and electronic warfare aircraft across the region. The United States has also deployed B-1 strategic bombers to the theater.

      – Iran has warned that any attack on its infrastructure or nuclear facilities will be met with comparable strikes against regional targets. Several Iranian analysts also argue that, should the United States substantially intensify its campaign, Iran would likely strike strategic targets inside Israel regardless of whether Israel is directly involved in the operation.

      Overall, these developments suggest that the conflict may be entering a more dangerous phase, potentially comparable to the peak of the 40-Day War.

    • Trump Is Losing Patience Over an Iran War With No Clear End in Sight - WSJ
      https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/trump-is-losing-patience-over-an-iran-war-with-no-clear-end-in-sight-c411d3cd

      Trump has […] told people that he thinks he can break the Iranians’ will through an aggressive bombing campaign, according to a person familiar with his views.

      “I believe he thinks he gave peace a chance,” said Rep. Michael McCaul (R., Texas), a senior member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee. “He’s going back to Plan A, which is the military operation.”

    • Danny (Dennis) Citrinowicz ,داني سيترينوفيتش sur X :
      https://x.com/citrinowicz/status/2081450732851495145

      Those who believe the United States can simply maintain maritime pressure indefinitely underestimate Tehran’s position. From Iran’s perspective, if it cannot export its own oil, then no one else should be able to do so freely through the Gulf. Meanwhile, renewed tensions between Saudi Arabia and the Houthis further strengthen Iran’s strategic position by increasing pressure on global shipping and energy markets.

      President Trump is therefore confronting one of the most consequential strategic decisions of his presidency. Every available option carries significant costs. But if the United States is not prepared to commit the military resources necessary to secure the Strait of Hormuz or to eliminate Iran’s remaining enriched uranium capability, then a negotiated settlement may ultimately be the more realistic path forward.

    • Esfandyar Batmanghelidj :
      https://x.com/yarbatman/status/2082397962949312880

      Iran’s latest ballistic missile attacks and the continued rejection of compromise solutions on the Strait of Hormuz might seem like indications that “hardline” thinking is dominating Iran’s national security strategy.

      But my conversations with counterparts in Tehran suggest that something else is at play. Iranian decisionmaking is increasingly shaped by an intense pessimism about what diplomacy with the U.S. can achieve. Most senior figures, whether pragmatists or hardliners, simply do not believe a deal is possible. This pessimism has gotten worse since the MOU was signed.

      […]

    • Iran Gambles on Escalation With Surprise Attack on U.S. Forces - WSJ
      https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/iran-gambles-on-escalation-with-surprise-attack-on-u-s-forces-72cfd422

      Iran’s surprise missile attack on U.S. forces in Jordan shows Tehran’s military leaders would rather risk ramping up the war than play defense or accept a peace deal that would expose them to greater domestic political pressures.

      Iran fired ballistic missiles on U.S. troops early Wednesday local time, demonstrating a willingness by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, which exerts more power than ever in Tehran, to escalate during a relative lull in the conflict and attempt to seize the initiative after weeks in which Iran has mostly reacted to U.S. and Israeli attacks.

      “They see themselves as having the upper hand,” said Hamidreza Azizi, a visiting fellow specializing in Iran at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs. “It was a signal of a sort of calibrated escalation.”

  • Israel ‘razing villages to the ground’ in southern Lebanon
    By Zeina Khodr Reporting from Ghandourieh, Lebanon
    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2026/7/16/iran-war-live-sirens-in-bahrain-kuwait-us-disables-iranian-oil-tanker

    The Israeli military has been systematically destroying civilian homes and infrastructure, razing villages to the ground.

    We are not far from the area Israel occupies in southern Lebanon – the closest position is less than 1km (0.6 miles) away. We have been here for about four hours and heard four explosions as Israeli demolitions continue.

    In Haddatha, another area in southern Lebanon, homes have been burned.

    Satellite images confirm widespread damage across the south, which corresponds to about 6 percent of the Lebanese territory.

    These homes are people’s lives. They were destroyed when there was supposed to be a ceasefire. Even between the last ceasefire in November 2024 and the latest flare-up in March 2026, daily demolitions by the Israeli army occurred in the region.

    #Liban

  • Iran war live: Tehran attacks Bahrain, Kuwait, Jordan after US bombings | US-Israel war on Iran News | Al Jazeera
    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2026/7/13/iran-war-live-us-bombs-iranian-cities-again-as-hormuz-standoff-intensifie

    Strait of Hormuz traffic slows to multi-week low

    The number of vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz has fallen to its lowest in five weeks, according to shipping data, amid renewed strikes between the US and Iran.

    Six ships crossed the strait on Sunday, according to Kpler data, including the Very Large Crude Carrier Humanity and the Capetan Andreas, transporting two million barrels of Iranian oil and 500,000 barrels of Kuwaiti petroleum products, respectively.

    Three empty tankers also entered the Gulf to load oil, according to the data.

    On Sunday, President Trump said the waterway was open to commercial vessels, though Iran earlier declared that it had shut the strait after a ship attempted to pass using an unapproved route.

  • What is Article 5 of Iran-US MoU, and why is it blamed for Hormuz strikes? | US-Israel war on Iran News | Al Jazeera
    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/6/28/why-is-article-5-of-mou-causing-confrontations-in-the-strait-of-hormuz

    Iran will make arrangements using its best efforts for the safe passage of commercial vessels with no charge for 60 days only from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman and vice versa,” Article 5 says.

    It also calls for the removal of “technical and military obstacles” and demining by Iran within 30 days.

  • Iran war live: | Al Jazeera
    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2026/6/28/iran-war-live-trump-threatens-tehran-as-us-bombs-sirik-qeshm-for-2nd-day

    39m ago (18:15 GMT)

    Israeli troops advance deeper into Deraa province in Syria

    Israeli forces have set up new checkpoints in Deraa province in southern Syria and advanced deeper into the area with military vehicles, the Syrian state news agency SANA is reporting.

    Israeli troops established a second checkpoint near the village of Sreyeh Jamlah in the western countryside of Deraa, 200 metres from another checkpoint installed yesterday.

    At least five Israeli military vehicles moved into the village of Abidin, also in the western countryside of Deraa, where forces set up two checkpoints in the village and searched passers-by.

    • Danny (Dennis) Citrinowicz :
      https://x.com/citrinowicz/status/2065519617326391564

      Le rapprochement croissant entre les Émirats arabes unis et l’Iran sape une hypothèse clé qui a façonné une grande partie du débat israélien au cours de l’année écoulée, à savoir que les États du Golfe se rapprocheraient d’Israël, étendraient les Accords d’Abraham, ou même soutiendraient une posture régionale plus confrontationnelle envers Téhéran à la suite de la guerre.

      En réalité, de nombreux États du Golfe sont profondément frustrés par Israël. De leur point de vue, ils ont été entraînés dans une crise régionale qui leur a imposé des coûts économiques et sécuritaires significatifs.

      Depuis les frappes sur le Qatar, beaucoup dans le Golfe considèrent de plus en plus Israël non pas comme une source de stabilité, mais comme un potentiel moteur d’escalade régionale.

      En conséquence, il y a peu de perspectives de nouveaux pas majeurs vers une normalisation avec Israël en l’absence de progrès spectaculaires sur la question palestinienne.

      Les dirigeants du Golfe comprennent que le régime iranien n’est pas près de disparaître, et ils ne voient aucun avantage stratégique à tenter d’isoler Téhéran ou de le pousser dans ses retranchements.

      Cela ne signifie pas que les États du Golfe sont devenus naïfs à l’égard de l’Iran. Ils restent profondément conscients des défis et des menaces posés par Téhéran. Cependant, leur stratégie préférée est la désescalade et la coexistence plutôt que la confrontation. De leur point de vue, maintenir des canaux de communication avec l’Iran est une nécessité, et non un choix.

    • https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/6/12/uae-to-unlock-frozen-iranian-funds-amid-us-ceasefire-push

      Two regional sources told Reuters that the UAE had agreed to release a total of $10bn, more than $3bn of which had already been delivered.

      Reuters also reported that two other sources with knowledge of the ⁠arrangement put the total funds involved at $20bn, adding that the move had been agreed in return for a halt to Iranian attacks on the UAE.

      One of the sources with knowledge of the arrangement also said a first tranche of $3bn had already been made available.

      Shortly after Reuters reported on the unlocking of funds, the UAE Foreign Affairs Ministry issued a statement denying the claims.

  • Tanker Industry Advisory Sheds New Light on Trump’s Secret Hormuz Transit Operation
    https://gcaptain.com/tanker-industry-advisory-sheds-new-light-on-trumps-secret-hormuz-transit-o

    President Donald Trump’s claim that a covert U.S. military operation has helped hundreds of commercial ships transit the Strait of Hormuz appears to be corroborated by an advisory earlier this month from INTERTANKO, the world’s largest tanker trade association, which describes a tightly controlled nighttime passage system operating along the Omani coast under close coordination with the U.S. Navy.

    These new details come one day after Trump publicly disclosed what he described as a previously undisclosed U.S. effort to support commercial shipping through the Strait. In a post on Truth Social Wednesday, the president said he had directed the military last month to carry out a “secret mission” that ultimately enabled more than 200 commercial ships and over 100 million barrels of oil to transit the waterway. Trump said the operation demonstrated that “the UNITED STATES of AMERICA CONTROLS the Strait of Hormuz — NOT Iran.”

    Speaking from the Oval Office on Thursday, Trump expanded on those claims, saying the Strait had effectively remained open for months through a little-known U.S. military operation supporting commercial shipping.

    “The strait is open. But the straits have been open for a number of months already and you just didn’t know about it,” Trump told reporters.

    “We’ve been taking out many ships that nobody knew. Not even the fake news knew it. Quietly at night. We bombed their radar and everything so they couldn’t see.”

    Trump said some nightly transit groups included between 14 and 26 vessels, adding that U.S. forces had helped move commercial traffic through the waterway while degrading Iranian surveillance capabilities.

    While the White House has released few operational details, the INTERTANKO advisory from June 5 describes a so-called “Omani route” operating under close coordination with the U.S. Navy. According to the association, vessels provide transit timings and waypoints to U.S. forces before entering the route.

    “The US has continued to strike Iranian targets around the SoH which have been used to launch drones or facilitate attacks against shipping,” INTERTANKO wrote in the advisory reviewed by gCaptain.

    “These US attacks have been in support of shipping within the so-called Omani route.”

    The advisory goes on to describe a highly unusual transit procedure. “Whilst underway in the route, the US advise that the ship should be blacked out with navigational lights off. Radar use should be minimised and AIS turned off,” the association said.

    Trump’s comments regarding specifics of the operation and transit figures are broadly consistent with numbers cited by INTERTANKO. The advisory said approximately 15 vessels per day were using the route, with movements conducted at night and timed to allow inbound and outbound traffic to pass safely in designated areas.

    “Transits take place at night and the numbers are split between both directions,” the association wrote, while also stressing that the groups were not formal convoys but coordinated transit windows.

    “For the deconfliction between vessels, the timing of the in-bound and out-bound groups (not convoys) enables the ships to pass in wider areas,” INTERTANKO wrote. “

    The guidance offers one of the clearest industry-level descriptions yet of how commercial shipping has continued through Hormuz despite months of conflict between the United States and Iran.

    Until now, U.S. officials had repeatedly denied reports that formal escort operations had resumed.

    In May, U.S. Central Command stated that Project Freedom had not restarted and that U.S. forces were not escorting merchant vessels through the Strait.

    The INTERTANKO advisory does not describe formal naval escorts. However, it does depict a tightly managed transit system operating under military coordination and supported by ongoing U.S. strikes against Iranian positions around the Strait.

    The advisory also highlights the navigational challenges created by the arrangement.

    According to INTERTANKO, vessels are sailing close to the coastlines of Oman and the UAE while operating with AIS disabled, navigational lights extinguished, and limited radar use. The association said it has raised concerns about navigational safety and proposed route modifications to improve safety margins.

    “INTERTANKO has raised concerns over the safety of navigation and suggested amendments to the routes to facilitate a higher level of navigational safety,” the advisory states.

    The document was issued in the context of ongoing negotiations between Washington and Tehran over a proposed memorandum of understanding that could eventually reopen the Strait without restrictions, remove the U.S. blockade, and establish terms for broader peace talks.

    The advisory offers a rare glimpse into how ships have continued moving through Hormuz during the conflict. But with negotiations ongoing, military operations continuing, and few official details released by either Washington or Tehran, significant questions remain about how long the current arrangements will remain in place—and what navigation through the world’s most important oil chokepoint will ultimately look like once a permanent settlement is reached.

    • J’ai pourtant lu beaucoup de commentaires affirmant que ces chiffres étaient parfaitement fantaisistes... Et j’ai du mal à croire que tout cela passe inaperçu dans un détroit large de 50 kms...

      Un exemple parmi d’autres :
      https://sonar21.com/trumps-covert-oil-scam-setting-the-record-straight
      This is nothing but pure bullshit. Let’s look at the numbers. Prior to the start of the Ramadan War on 28 February, the Persian Gulf countries sent 20 million barrels of oil per day through the Strait of Hormuz. A very large oil tanker can carry 2 million barrels. In other words, at least 50 ships passed through the straits carrying what amounts to 5-days of exports from the Gulf.

      And just to put this into further perspective, 100 million barrels represents 5-days of consumption in the US. This is not a consequential amount. It is small potatoes in the world context. But I return to my original question — Why is Trump blowing the cover on a supposedly successful op? It makes no sense. Weigh in if you have an explanation for this bizarre behavior.

    • Did US sneak 100 million barrels of oil out of Hormuz, as Trump claims? | US-Israel war on Iran News | Al Jazeera
      https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/6/11/did-us-sneak-100-million-barrels-of-oil-out-of-hormuz-as-trump-claims

      The president’s claim of 100 million barrels of oil is roughly equal to five days of pre-war output — compared with some two billion barrels that should have transited through the Strait of Hormuz over the duration of the war, if not for the ongoing conflict.

      But even five days of pre-war maritime traffic through the strait would amount to about 700 ships.

      And while, as Trump claimed, vessels being guided by the US military in the waterway have at times turned off their transponders, there is no evidence so far that the volume of traffic passing through the strait during the war is enough to support his claims.

      Shipping tracking and intelligence companies offer differing numbers of vessels that crossed the strait since tensions began. That is because their criteria differ on what constitutes a transit.

      Windward recorded nearly 80 commercial ships leaving the Gulf in the last five weeks; Lloyd’s List estimates 142 vessels have left the waters since March; and Kpler puts that number at its highest, recording 264 ship transits.

      Even Kpler’s figure falls well short of the level of maritime traffic that, before the war, would have amounted to 100 million barrels of oil passing through the Strait of Hormuz.

      Many of the ships that have passed through the strait have transited with Iranian authorisation — paying tolls to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) — rather than through a US scheme that kept Tehran in the dark.

    • US Ships Escort Oil Tankers Through Hormuz at Night, Burgum Says
      https://gcaptain.com/us-ships-escort-oil-tankers-through-hormuz-at-night-burgum-says

      (Bloomberg) — U.S. forces are helping move millions of barrels through the Strait of Hormuz under the cover of darkness, sometimes escorting more than 20 ships per night out of the vital waterway, US Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said Friday. 

      Now that sea mines have been cleared, the initiative has led to “some nights, more than 20 ships coming out,” Burgum said Friday on CNBC.

      With some ultra-large carriers holding 2 million barrels of crude, that adds up to “substantial amounts of oil that have come out of the strait,” Burgum added. 

      Burgum’s comments offer some of the most fulsome descriptions yet of a once clandestine operation to free oil tankers and other commercial ships that have been trapped since the US and Israel launched attacks on Iran in late February. 

      Tanker Industry Advisory Sheds New Light on Trump’s Secret Hormuz Transit Operation

      The waterway previously provided passage for about a fifth of the world’s crude flows, and its effective closure has blocked millions of barrels from reaching the market daily, causing a global spike in oil and fuel prices. 

      President Donald Trump on Wednesday said the effort has helped suppress crude costs, claiming in a social media post that more than 200 commercial ships and 100 million barrels of oil had safely exited Hormuz under the “secret mission.” Separately Wednesday, Trump told reporters the US had taken 22 ships out of the strait “late at night, with no lights” to avoid detection.

      Futures for West Texas Intermediate, the US oil benchmark, were trading at $85.48 per barrel on Friday, with a decline fed by optimism the US and Iran are edging close to a peace deal.

      Although a US-imposed blockade is preventing Iranian crude shipments, non-Iranian oil flows through the strait have surged by about 50% so far this month. Shippers have employed tactics such as so-called dark transits, navigating the waterway with transponders and tracking signals switched off to avoid detection. 

      At least 1.8 million barrels exited the Persian Gulf during each of the first 10 days of June, according to Vortexa Ltd.

      Burgum suggested oil markets have responded to the revived crude flows. “I think the markets figured that out before some of the tabloid press did, because you’re starting to see a softening of oil prices,” he said.