Politics – Mother Jones

/politics

  • How Joe Biden Became America’s Top Israel Hawk – Mother Jones
    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2023/12/how-joe-biden-became-americas-top-israel-hawk

    Le président a dit un jour : « Israël pourrait se battre avec ce pays et nous le défendrions quand même ». C’est désormais plus clair que jamais.

    Chapô d’un lonbg long et accablant article sur l’historique des relations de Biden avec Israël.

    The president once said “Israel could get into a fistfight with this country and we’d still defend” it. That is now clearer than ever.

    • @arno c’est pas plutôt les « géants de l’histoire avec une grande H » ?

      (j’évite l’écriture inclusive de peur de poursuites en justice)

    • Mort d’Henry Kissinger : les zones d’ombre d’une éminence grise
      https://archive.ph/2023.11.30-115507/https://www.lemonde.fr/disparitions/article/2023/11/30/mort-d-henry-kissinger-les-zones-d-ombre-d-une-eminence-grise_6203046_3382.h

      Dès 1975, la commission du Sénat américain, présidée par Frank Church, avait révélé son rôle dans la chute du régime de Salvador Allende au profit de la dictature Pinochet, au Chili, en 1973. En 2000, la déclassification des archives sur ces événements a étayé ces accusations. Dans son livre publié en 2001, Les Crimes de Monsieur Kissinger (The Trial of Henry Kissinger, Ed. Saint-Simon), le journaliste Christopher Hitchens accuse celui-ci de crimes de guerre, non seulement en Amérique latine, mais aussi au Cambodge (pour les bombardements de 1969 à 1973).

      Plusieurs magistrats, au Chili, en Argentine et en France, ont cherché – en vain – à entendre l’ancien secrétaire d’Etat qui, de ce fait, a été contraint de rayer certains pays de ses tournées de conférences. Il quitta ainsi précipitamment la France en mai 2001 après s’être vu remettre une convocation du juge Roger Le Loire, qui enquêtait sur le plan « Condor » d’élimination des opposants aux dictatures latino-américaines.

      Des conversations enregistrées à la Maison Blanche et révélées en 2013 ne laissent aucun doute. « Nous ne laisserons pas le Chili partir à l’égout », y menace ainsi Henry Kissinger en 1970, après l’élection d’Allende. De la Grèce à la Thaïlande et des Philippines à l’Argentine, la crainte du communisme et la défense des intérêts économiques américains mobilisait davantage le chef de la diplomatie américaine que la démocratie. Fidèle à lui-même, il n’eût de cesse de défendre la Chine contre les partisans de sanctions visant ses atteintes aux droits de l’homme.

      Le phénix de la diplomatie

      Cela ne l’empêcha nullement de poursuivre sa carrière universitaire, éditoriale et politique. Enseignant à l’université de Georgetown dès 1977, il fonda en 1982, à New York, un très lucratif cabinet de consultant au service de grandes sociétés privées (Exxon Mobil, American Express) et de gouvernements. Un temps conseiller du gouvernement vénézuélien (1990), de la Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer et du Crédit lyonnais (1994) et de Walt Disney (1997), Henry Kissinger n’a jamais perdu pour autant son accès privilégié à la Maison Blanche. Jusqu’au bout, il est resté un « insider ». Chaque président l’a consulté, tant pour valider ses orientations que pour neutraliser un personnage à la langue acérée, raffolant des médias.

      Ronald Reagan lui confia une commission sur l’Amérique centrale ; le démocrate Clinton lui demanda conseil avant d’abandonner tout lien entre avantages commerciaux et droits de l’homme en Chine. La proximité fut maximale avec George W. Bush, qui le nomma président de la commission d’enquête sur le 11-Septembre. Dès décembre 2002, M. Kissinger en démissionna après que la presse, soupçonnant des conflits d’intérêts, lui eût réclamé en vain la liste de ses clients. En 2006, Bob Woodward, journaliste vedette du Washington Post, rend compte en détail des conversations répétées du président Bush avec « dear Henry », qui encourageait la guerre en Irak. « La victoire sur l’insurrection est la seule stratégie de sortie sérieuse », proclamait-il alors. Trois décennies plus tôt, il avait conseillé Nixon de bombarder massivement le nord du Vietnam.

  • Senior US Official Appears to Endorse Collective Punishment of Gazans – Mother Jones
    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2023/11/brett-mcgurk-collective-punishment-gaza-hostages

    At a summit in Bahrain on Saturday, a US official stated that far more humanitarian aid would be allowed into Gaza if Hamas released the hostages it is holding. In doing so, Brett McGurk, the White House Coordinator for the Middle East and North Africa, effectively conceded that Israel is subjecting the people of Gaza to collective punishment.

    Collective punishment is a war crime.

    “A release of large numbers of hostages would result in a significant pause in fighting. A significant pause in fighting,” McGurk stated, “and a massive surge of humanitarian relief. Hundreds and hundreds of trucks on a sustained basis entering Gaza from Egypt.”

    “This is the pathway to a pause in the fighting. The release of hostages,” McGurk added. “The onus here is on Hamas. This is the path. Simply calling for ceasefire is not a path to peace.”

    Jeremy Konyndyk, president of Refugees International, argued that McGurk’s words violated the laws of armed conflict.

    McGurk explained the United States would keep its disagreements with Israel private. “ We will not tell another country how to grieve or how to protect itself, ” McGurk said. “But as friends and partners, we will do our best. And offer our best advice and counsel.”

    McGurk […] is now one of the most influential advisers shaping Biden’s response to the war in Gaza .

    #Leadership #criminels #états-unis

  • Les mamans les plus puissantes d’Amérique | Kiera Butler
    https://cabrioles.substack.com/p/les-mamans-les-plus-puissantes-damerique

    Leur croisade contre l’éducation publique n’est qu’un début.

    Que feront donc les Moms for Liberty si elles prennent le contrôle des conseils scolaires ? Elles promettent des choses claires, comme lutter contre et les mesures de prévention sanitaire (masques et vaccins) et faire pression sur les bibliothèques scolaires pour qu’elles retirent les livres qu’elles jugent obscènes. Elles veulent supprimer les enseignements sur le racisme systémique, les livres adaptés aux LGBTI, les aménagements pour les étudiant·es transgenres. Mais, si vous écoutez attentivement, vous pourrez entendre des allusions à un objectif bien plus radical : liquider les écoles publiques.

    Kiera Butler est rédactrice en chef chez Mother Jones. Elle couvre les sujets santé, alimentation et environnement. Elle supervise aussi les reportages sur les pandémies. Kiera a contribué au lancement et à la co-animation du podcast MoJo’s food politics, Bite. Elle est l’autrice du livre Raise : What 4-H Teaches 7 Million Kids- and How Its Lessons Could Change Food and Farming Forever (University of California Press).

    Fondé en 1976, Mother Jones https://www.motherjones.com est un organe d’informations et d’investigation indépendant à but non lucratif financé par ses lecteurs. Récompensé par ses pairs comme Magazine de l’année, Mother Jones aborde les grands thèmes de l’époque, de la politique à la justice pénale et raciale, en passant par l’éducation, le changement climatique et l’alimentation/agriculture. Mother Jones c’est aussi le nom sous lequel est connue la militante activiste Mary G. Harris Jones fondatrice des Industrial Workers of the World
     

    [Note de Cabrioles] En cette rentrée scolaire 2022 nous vous proposons en collaboration avec l’indispensable Action Antifouchiste - qui mène un précieux travail de veille à propos des réseaux conspiracistes anti-prévention - la traduction de cette enquête sur les Moms for Liberty qui semblent être l’une des principales sources d’inspiration du groupe français les Mamans Louves, un des satellites du réseau antisémite de désinformation médicale Réinfocovid.

    _____________________________________

    C’est la première journée complète du sommet national inaugural des « Moms for Liberty, Joyful Warriors », et 500 de ces joyeuses guerrières écoutent attentivement le discours d’ouverture du gouverneur de Floride, Ron DeSantis. La grande salle de bal du Tampa Marriott est bondée. Autour des tables, les « Mamas for DeSantis » agitent des pancartes et portent des T-shirts aux slogans explicites : « Je ne coparente pas avec le gouvernement », « Arrêtez l’endoctrinement Woke ». Elles se trémoussent et applaudissent lorsque DeSantis, qui envisage la course aux présidentielles en 2024, se vante d’avoir résisté au « gauchisme » de Disney ou encore lorsqu’il se réfère au président « gaffeur » Joe Biden.

    Les mamans ont été chauffées à blanc toute la matinée : la journée a débuté par une version « luxe » de l’hymne national additionné d’un couplet rarement chanté ajouté en 1986, sous les regards d’une Garde d’Honneur de quatre adolescents, drapeaux, sabres et fusils aux clairs. S’est ensuivi une prière faisant appel à Dieu dans la lutte contre le fléau du progressisme dans les écoles. Lorsque M. De Santis est finalement monté sur scène, trois dirigeantes de Moms for Liberty lui ont remis une épée bleu vif, ornée du logo du groupe. « C’est ce que les gladiateurs recevaient en récompense après avoir livré une longue et dure bataille pour la liberté », a déclaré la fondatrice du groupe, Tina Descovich. « C’est une distinction remise par l’ensemble des Moms for Liberty, pour tout ce que vous avez fait pour défendre les droits des parents. » Serrant l’épée dans ses bras, DeSantis a souri à la foule tandis que la presse, au fond de la salle de bal, les mitraillait de photos.


    Le gouverneur Ron DeSantis reçoit « The Liberty Sword » lors du sommet national Moms for Liberty à Tampa.

    « Les droits des parents », c’est le cri de ralliement de Moms for Liberty. Elles ne parlent cependant pas de tous les droits. Elles ne se préoccupent, par exemple, pas du droit d’un parent à garantir la sécurité de son enfant LGBTI à l’école, ou que son enfant immunodéprimé·e, soit protégé·e du Covid. C’est au contraire autour de préoccupations parentales résolument conservatrices et réactionnaires qu’elles ont engagés leur action. Elles veulent supprimer les enseignements sur le racisme systémique, les livres adaptés aux LGBTI, les aménagements pour les étudiant·es transgenres et les mesures de prévention sanitaire (masques et vaccins). Elles défendent aussi le deuxième amendement, celui-là même qui a permis les tueries dans les écoles américaines. Elles travaillent à la réalisation de ces objectifs avec une bonne humeur aussi inébranlable que factice, d’où le thème de la conférence : « Guerrières Joyeuses ». « Les gens veulent être entourés de personnes joyeuses », déclare une des organisatrices. « Ils ne veulent pas nécessairement être entourés de personnes en colère, qui crient, qui hurlent, sinon ça ne va pas se développer ».

    Moms for Liberty n’est pas le seul groupe de défense des droits des parents à s’être constitué ces dernières années dans la bataille pour l’hégémonie culturelle, mais c’est l’un des plus importants. L’organisation a été officiellement fondée début 2021. À peine 19 mois plus tard, elle compte plus de 100 000 membres dans quelque 200 groupes locaux répartis dans 38 États.

    Les positions extrêmes de ses partisan.es au sujet de l’éducation, avait déjà donné au mouvement une visibilité médiatique nationale. Récemment, dans le New Hampshire, une section locale a offert une récompense de 500 $ à quiconque surprendrait un·e enseignant·e qui parlerait à ses élèves de racisme systémique. L’année dernière, après que la fondatrice de Moms for Liberty, Tina Descovich, ait perdu sa course pour intégrer le conseil scolaire dans le comté de Brevard en Floride, son adversaire, Jennifer Jenkins, a rapporté que le groupe était à l’origine de manifestations menaçantes. « Nous venons vous chercher », « Pédophile », criait la foule rassemblée devant son domicile, rapporte un éditorial du Washington Post. « Nous arrivons comme un train en marche ! Nous allons vous faire demander grâce. Si vous pensiez que le 6 janvier [attaque du Capitole par les partisan·es de Trump Ndt] était terrible, attendez de voir ce qu’on vous réserve ! ».Une personne malveillante l’avait dénoncée au ministère de l’Enfance et de la Famille, affirmant à tort qu’elle avait abusé de sa fille de 5 ans. « S’il y a des divergences d’opinion sur ce qui est juste pour tous·tes les élèves, je serais ravi d’en discuter », a-t-elle écrit. « Mais j’ai aussi des droits, et cela inclut le droit d’être à l’abri du harcèlement et des agressions. » (La justice a nié l’implication de Moms for Liberty dans cette campagne de harcèlement. "Nous sommes des guerrières de la joie, et notre section n’a jamais été impliquée dans quoi que ce soit de ce genre", ont-t-elles déclaré).

    Le battage médiatique autour de Moms for Liberty tend souvent à les dépeindre comme des « cinglées », impossibles à prendre au sérieux. Mais, ce serait une erreur de sous-estimer leur pouvoir ou la possibilité qu’elles deviennent des actrices décisives dans les élections de mi-mandat. Si elle se présente comme une simple organisation populaire — une association peu structurée de mères partageant les mêmes idées et préoccupées par les tendances progressistes de l’éducation — parmi ses partisan·es, on compte pourtant des poids lourds du mouvement conservateur. D’influent·es stratèges républicain·es font partie de son équipe dirigeante, et d’importants Think Tank de droite leur apportent soutien financier et expertise.

    Toutes ces prouesses politiques conservatrices alimentent un objectif explicite : prendre le contrôle des School Board, les conseils scolaires. (...)

    [2020] Elles commencent alors à s’organiser, avec des ami·es et des voisin·es, ell·eux aussi indigné·es par les politiques de prévention sanitaire liée au Covid. Mais également par ce dont iels ont été témoins lors des cours en distanciel sur Zoom pendant le confinement. « Beaucoup ont été étonné·es de constater qu’au lieu d’apprendre à lire, à écrire et à compter, leurs enfants recevaient des leçons sur des sujets très controversés et d’un intérêt scolaire discutable », écrivent les deux fondatrices, dans une tribune publiée en novembre 2021, dans le Washington Post. (...)

    Si l’association Moms for Liberty est récente, les idées qui l’animent sont anciennes. C’est d’ailleurs une panique morale concernant le bien-être des #enfants qui est à l’origine des toutes premières théories conspirationnistes européennes, qui accusaient les Juifs d’assassiner les bébés chrétiens et de boire leur sang. Cette frénésie complotiste s’est à nouveau manifestée aux USA à partir des années 1950, lors du mouvement pour les droits civiques, lorsque des parents blanc·hes luttant contre la déségrégation ont affirmé que leurs filles seraient violées par des garçons noirs.

    [...]

    Ce n’est pas que les femmes soient plus crédules que les hommes, explique-t-elle. Ce sont plutôt les structures sociales sous-jacentes — celles qui font peser de manière disproportionnée la charge des enfants sur les mères — qui rendent les femmes vulnérables. Les pourvoyeur·euses de désinformation exploitent délibérément ces vulnérabilités. Les femmes ont la lourde charge de protéger les enfants contre tout danger — souvent sans congé familial payé, ni services de garde d’enfants abordables. La menace d’enlèvement et d’agression d’enfants, qui est au cœur des nombreuses théories complotistes qui circulent en ligne, laisse de nombreuses mères dans un état d’anxiété constante. Cette préoccupation obsessionnelle pour la sécurité des enfants, dans un monde rempli de prédateurs, peut constituer un terrain fertile à la propagation de la pensée conspirationniste. « Vous êtes à un moment très incertain de votre vie, dans la période d’incertitude incroyable que nous avons connue, et en plus, vous êtes isolée », dit Moran. Il est compréhensible que des femmes « aillent en ligne où il est trop facile de trouver, non seulement des informations erronées, mais également des communautés incroyables qui se construisent autour de ces narratifs

    #pour_le_bien_de_nos_enfants #Mother_Jones #Moms_for_Liberty #école #école_publique #écoles_sous_contrat #écoles_privées #néo-néo_cons #USA #hégémonie_culturelle #conseils_scolaires #wokisme #conpirationnisme #complotisme #racisme #extrême_droite #QAnon #hétérosexualité

  • The Supreme Court Just Expanded States’ Power to Prosecute Crimes on Tribal Land
    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2022/06/supreme-court-castro-huerta-ruling

    The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that Oklahoma has the authority to prosecute non-Native people who commit crimes against a Native person on tribal lands. 

    The justices, in a 5-4 decision, said that both the state and federal government have jurisdiction to prosecute these crimes. The case, Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, had been viewed as a pivotal one that cuts right into the heart of the fight over tribal sovereignty. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote the majority opinion. 

    Neil Gorsuch, who was joined by the three liberal justice in his dissent, wrote that when the Cherokee were exiled to Oklahoma, they were promised that they would be free from state interference. “Where this Court once stood firm, today it wilts,” Gorsuch wrote. “Where our predecessors refused to participate in one State’s unlawful power grab at the expense of the Cherokee, today’s Court accedes to another’s.”

    Je ne trouve aucune reprise dans les médias français (en tout cas ceux référencés sur Gougoule Niouzes), alors que l’interwebz américain est largement consacré à cette nouvelle étape dans l’agenda ultra-conservateur de la Cour suprême.

  • I Called Everyone in Jeffrey Epstein’s Little Black Book – Mother Jones
    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/10/i-called-everyone-in-jeffrey-epsteins-little-black-book

    Un journaliste de Mother Jones a appelé l’ensemble des numéros du carnet d’adresse de Epstein qui avait fuité publiquement.

    I sat on my couch and phoned up royalty, spoke to ambassadors, irritated a senior adviser at Blackstone, and left squeaky voicemails for what must constitute a considerable percentage of the world oligarchy.

    Et surtout, le carnet d’adresse est entièrement (et non censuré) en ligne, indexé par page et par nom, ainsi que tout le carnet des vols aussi :
    https://epsteinsblackbook.com

    #Jeffrey_Epstein #Epstein #carnet_d'adresse #téléphone #Mother_Jones #pédophilie

  • The Logic of Corporate Accounting Took Over Our Language, and We Hardly Noticed – Mother Jones
    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2021/08/the-logic-of-corporate-accounting-took-over-our-language-and-we-hardly-

    High on the post–World War II boom, enthusiastic conservative economists like the University of Chicago’s Gary Becker began to think that the logic of corporate accounting could be applied to all facets of human life. In Becker’s influential 1962 study, “Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis,” he theorized that the cost of training and educating workers could be measured as the return in profits and wages to employees. He called it a “unified and powerful theory.”

    #capitalisme #langage

  • Robinhood Promises Free Trades. Did Alex Kearns Pay With His Life? – Mother Jones
    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2021/04/robinhood-gamestop-free-trades-alex-kearns

    aiju Bhatt and Vlad Tenev came up with the idea for Robinhood in 2012, after witnessing Occupy Wall Street. The protests, they’ve said, represented a boiling over of grievances among their generation, directed at the big banks that set off the 2008 financial crisis. Tenev and Bhatt, then in their mid-20s, friends going back to meeting as physics majors at Stanford, wanted to build something that might give their fellow millennials access to the wealth-growing power of the market. At the time brokerages charged $7 to $10 per trade. The idea for a $0 fee trading app, named after a wealth-redistributing outlaw, was born.

    While the app was in development, Robinhood built up its antiestablishment identity and courted millennials with teaser videos that razzed traders on the stock exchange floor, and with a lineup of celebrity investors—eventually growing to just about everyone from Ashton Kutcher to Jay-Z—who’d all come of age in the same Y2K moment as their target audience. Online, they created a minimalist launch page where interested people could drop their email address for access to beta versions of the app—and gamified it by allowing people to move up the line by referring friends.

    “The fact that we’re a brokerage leads people to think that a service like Robinhood should exist to make money,” Tenev said at the conference. “But that’s really not the case. The purpose of Robinhood is to make buying and selling stocks as frictionless as possible. If we make money as a side effect of that, that’s great.”

    But Robinhood’s profitability wasn’t a side effect of being frictionless. It was very much the point. From founding, its business model was dependent on customers trading frequently, allowing the company the chance to earn a different kind of commission—known as PFOF, or “payment for order flow”—from every transaction. The payments are essentially a finder’s fee given to Robinhood by so-called market makers, the Wall Street firms who make money executing individual investors’ trades. Since launch, Robinhood has enthusiastically embraced PFOF, arranging favorable rates that eclipsed other brokerages’, making it the company’s single largest source of revenue. The money flows evoke a key lesson of the digital age: If something is free, then you’re not the customer—you’re the product being sold.

    “Robinhood and the high frequency trading firms have the same incentives, which is to cause there to be as much trading as humanly possible, to create as much flow as humanly possible, which maximizes profits for the executing dealers and Robinhood,” says Dennis Kelleher, the president of Better Markets, a Wall Street reform nonprofit.

    As Sen. Elizabeth Warren pointed out in a February letter to Citadel’s CEO, the practice means the “more shares they see, the more bread crumbs they take.” It can also encourage brokers to seek market makers that will give them the best PFOF, rather than the best prices for their customers—despite an Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) mandate known as the “best execution” rule that requires brokers to always seek the best deal for customers

    From its founding days, the app’s interface was overseen by Bhatt, who pushed an inviting feel in contrast to the intimidating or alienating vibe of other brokerages’ interfaces, full of analyst ratings and finance-speak. “We make use of simple colors to remove as much information as possible,” a company designer told a trade publication.

    “Baiju is someone who really cares about minimalism and clean design,” an early Robinhood design staffer told me. “It was important to him to build a trading platform in the most minimal way possible.”

    Robinhood also pioneered the selling of fractional shares, which Natasha Dow Schüll, an anthropology professor at NYU who wrote a book about addictive gambling design, compares to penny slots—small stakes bets that make users feel less risk and thus invite them to trade more. The app’s default settings flood users with emoji-laden push notifications that can coax customer trades. For new joiners, the notices direct them to lists of the app’s most popular stocks, or of “Daily Movers”: the 20 stocks with the biggest daily percent change in price—regardless of if the price went up or down. As Vicki Bogan, a professor and behavioral finance expert at Cornell’s business school, told a recent congressional hearing, such “cues, pushes, and rewards” work to “exploit natural human tendencies for achievement and competition…to motivate individuals to make more trades.”

    Parts of the app remind Schüll of Las Vegas casinos, where carpet is installed so it never presents a right angle, a stopping point that forces walkers to make a decision. “The last thing you want to do when you’re engaging a gambler—or in this case, a trader—is to put them in a position of a rational decision maker,” she says. “You want to have the carpet smoothly and seamlessly turn into the gaming area, so that the easiest thing for the person to do is to continue moving forward. You see that absolutely in the design of this app. It’s about instantaneity, immediacy, ease of access—you just kind of flow right into it.” This March, the House Financial Services Committee echoed concerns that platforms like Robinhood “encourage behavior similar to a gambling addiction.”

    #Robinhood #Gamestop #Marchés_financiers #Manipulation_mentale #Addiction #Jeu #Finance #Fintech

  • Amazon Has Become a Prime Revolving-Door Destination in Washington – Mother Jones
    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2021/03/amazon-has-become-a-prime-revolving-door-destination-in-washington

    A Mother Jones investigation has identified at least 247 US government officials and employees—with about 150 hailing from the intelligence, cybersecurity, law enforcement, and military fields—who were hired by Amazon in the past 10 years or so. About 200 of them have been retained by the fast-growing company since the start of 2017. This list is not comprehensive and represents what is likely only a portion of federal employees who left government service for Amazon. It was compiled by searching LinkedIn and locating people who, according to their profiles, had worked in the federal government directly before moving to Amazon; it relies on information provided by the platform’s users. There are no public records that track all the US officials and employees hired by Amazon or other firms.

    It is not uncommon for prominent firms to vacuum up government officials who can lobby their former agencies, win and manage lucrative government contracts, offer strategic or legal advice, or perform other services. Boeing, Raytheon, and other military contractors hire loads of people from the Defense Department and the armed services. (Most of the senior military officials—generals, admirals, and others—who leave the Pentagon for the private sector do become lobbyists for military firms.) Consulting firms, including McKinsey & Company, frequently recruit former US officials.

    “If you combine the quantity and breadth of their hires, Amazon may have more of a revolving door than any other American company now,” says Jeff Hauser, director of the Revolving Door Project at the Center for Economic and Policy Research. “There is almost no department of the US government Amazon is not interested in.” Timothy LaPira, a professor of political science and revolving-door expert at James Madison University, points out that Amazon wants people with government experience who can help the company understand the regulatory landscape and how to adapt to it: “Amazon is probably not buying access so much as they’re buying the expertise of what happens behind closed doors.”

    Amazon declined to comment for this story.

    The roster of Amazon hires spans the US government. The list includes an undersecretary for the Transportation Department, a Pentagon deputy general counsel, a US Treasury economist, a Federal Trade Commission associate general counsel, a Food and Drug Administration cybersecurity operations director, a US Trade Representative senior director, a National Economic Council senior director for trade policy, a former US ambassador to the World Trade Organization, a Justice Department senior counsel in the computer crime and intellectual property section, a National Transportation Safety Board public affairs director, a General Services Administration acting assistant commissioner, a Veterans Administration senior program manager, a Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services senior adviser for information technology, and an Office of Management and Budget chief acquisition officer.

    There are many from the military and national security agencies: a State Department internet policy adviser, a Department of Homeland Security cyberthreat intelligence analyst, a National Security Council director for space policy, a US Air Force deputy chief of staff for operations, an FBI assistant director, a National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency talent acquisition manager, a National Security Agency network analysis chief, a US Navy cryptologic warfare officer, a Defense Intelligence Agency operations officer, a senior official at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, a Defense Contract Audit Agency auditor, an Office of the Director of National Intelligence senior plans officer, and a CIA East Africa Branch chief. (According to the Intercept, Amazon has in recent years hired more than 20 former FBI agents for its global security center in Arizona.)

    One prominent example: In 2018, Lartease Tiffith, a senior counsel for then-Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), jumped to Amazon to become an in-house lobbyist and senior manager for privacy, security, and consumer protection. Previously, Tiffith had worked for Feinstein and the Justice Department.

    In 2020, Amazon spent $18.7 million on Washington lobbying—about a $2 million increase from the previous year—and assembled an influence-swaying army of 20 different lobbying firms and 118 individual lobbyists, which included 41 in-house lobbyists. One member of this force was veteran lobbyist Jeff Ricchetti, the brother of Steve Ricchetti, a counselor to President Joe Biden. Amazon signed a contract with Jeff Ricchetti a week after Biden was declared the winner of the 2020 election.

    Perhaps the most noticed move from DC politics to Amazon came in 2015 when Jay Carney, a onetime journalist who had been President Barack Obama’s press secretary, joined the firm as its senior vice president of global corporate affairs—Amazon’s top person in Washington. (Before working for Obama, Carney was communications director for then–Vice President Biden.) As Business Insider reported, Carney “oversees public policy and communications and is a member of Amazon’s elite ‘S-team,’ a group of 23 of the company’s most senior employees that helps shape culture and policy at Amazon.” He reports directly to Bezos.

    Amazon has grown substantially in recent years to become a company like no other in the United States. It has a wide array of interests that stretch across the entire landscape of the US government and that mostly fall within two fundamental areas: regulation and contracts. The firm, the second-largest employer in the United States (after Walmart), has long been criticized for its workplace conditions and is battling a much-watched union organizing effort in Alabama. (So it would deeply care about the Department of Labor, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and the National Labor Relations Board.) It owns Whole Foods. (Cue the US Department of Agriculture and the Food and Drug Administration.) It faces international regulatory challenges. (Keep an eye on the USTR, the State Department, and the Commerce Department.) It has developed one of the largest trucking and delivery systems in the nation. (Watch the Department of Transportation.) Cyber-commerce and cybersecurity are top concerns. (Track the National Security Agency, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, and the FBI.) And with its Prime streaming service, there’s telecommunications, net neutrality, and broadband issues. (That means the Federal Communications Commission.) Intellectual property, privacy, Section 230, tax regulations, trade policy, mail delivery, infrastructure, energy, and sustainability—so many matters critical to Amazon are overseen by one or multiple government entities.

    And then there’s antitrust. As one of the biggest companies on the planet, Amazon needs to fret about regulators and officials at the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission who could be concerned about its dominance in multiple markets and its possible use of monopolistic predatory pricing.

    Simultaneously, the US government has become an important source of revenue for Amazon, primarily though Amazon Web Services, which sells cloud-based services. AWS pitches itself on its website as a crucial supplier for the government: “The AWS Cloud provides secure, scalable, and cost-efficient solutions to support the unique requirements and missions of the US federal government. Our cloud services can be employed to meet mandates, reduce costs, drive efficiencies, and increase innovation across civilian agencies, intelligence community, and the Department of Defense.”

    #Amazon #Lobbying #Pantouflage #Etat_dans_l_Etat

  • “Get the Hell Off”: The Indigenous Fight to Stop a Uranium Mine in the Black Hills – Mother Jones
    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/05/the-black-hills-are-not-for-sale

    Today, Brave and other Lakota elders are staring down yet another encroachment on their historic lands: a 10,600-acre uranium mine proposed to be built in the Black Hills. The Dewey-Burdock mine would suck up as much as 8,500 gallons of groundwater per minute from the Inyan Kara aquifer to extract as much as 10 million pounds of ore in total. Lakota say the project violates both the 1868 US-Lakota treaty and federal environmental laws by failing to take into account the sacred nature of the site. If the mine is built, they say, burial grounds would be destroyed and the region’s waters permanently tainted.

    A legal win for the Lakota would represent an unprecedented victory for a tribe over corporations such as Power­tech, the Canadian-owned firm behind Dewey-­Burdock, that have plundered the resource-rich hills. And it could set precedents forcing federal regulators to protect Indigenous sites and take tribes’ claims more seriously. The fight puts the Lakota on a collision course with the Trump administration, which has close ties to energy companies and is doubling down on nuclear power while fast-tracking new permits and slashing environmental protections—even using the coronavirus pandemic as an excuse to further roll back regulations. All of this makes Black Hills mineral deposits more attractive than they’ve been in decades.

    #peuples_autochtones #extractivisme

  • Trump Has Flooded DC With Law Enforcement Officers Who Won’t Identify Themselves – Mother Jones
    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/06/trump-has-flooded-dc-with-law-enforcement-officers-who-wont-identify-th

    I asked two men who they were with. “We’re with the Department of Justice,” one answered. “Are you with a specific agency?” I asked. “Are you regular DOJ employees or just detailed there?” He responded: “We’re with the Department of Justice” to all my questions. He asked me who I was with, which I was happy to share, and why I wanted to know, which I’d hoped was obvious. This is America. We are supposed to know who’s policing us.

    But things are changing. The Trump administration, in the name of order, is claiming the power to use unidentified federal law enforcement personnel to police protests. On top of the dizzying array of federal law enforcement already out in force this week, these are some of the “federal assets” that Donald Trump said he was deploying in DC in the wake of large protests and substantial looting and property damage on Sunday night. These officers, if that’s what they are, have not only declined to identify themselves, but appear to be actively taking steps to hide their affiliation.

    Défaut d’#identification, ça fait flipper les US. Imagine avec une petite customisation de faf comme en France !
    #police

  • The Discredited Science Behind the Rise of Single-Sex Public Schools – Mother Jones
    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/05/single-sex-public-schools-brain-science-gender

    The idea that boys and girls have innate characteristics that cause them to learn differently has picked up momentum over the past decade. The Gurian Institute says it has trained 60,000 educators in 2,000 school districts—to the tune of as much as $10,000 per session. Another prominent advocate of sex-differentiated education, the psychologist Leonard Sax, offers a popular two-day workshop for schools on “the emerging science of male-female differences.” At the Boy Brains & Engagement Conference, hundreds of teachers rack up continuing education credits while hearing about boys’ and girls’ learning styles. “Scientists have discovered about 100 typical gender differences in the brain,” states its brochure.

    These ideas have gained traction among policymakers. The No Child Left Behind legislation signed by President George W. Bush in 2002 encouraged single-sex classrooms. Though the Obama administration pushed back against that idea, state legislators have taken up the cause: Florida Gov. Rick Scott signed a law allowing “gender-specific classrooms” in 2014; California passed a similar law in 2017. The number of single-sex public schools has exploded over the last two decades, up from a handful in the early 2000s to a few hundred today.

    #non-mixité #mixité #école #genre #USA

  • How Twitter Botched Its Fact-Check of Trump’s Lies – Mother Jones
    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/05/how-twitter-botched-its-fact-check-of-trumps-lies

    Facing widespread condemnation for not removing President Trump’s tweets falsely accusing MSNBC host Joe Scarborough of murder, Twitter finally took action. On Wednesday, the company slapped disclaimer links onto two of Trump’s tweets, the first time it has pushed back on the misinformation that regularly flows from the president’s account.

    But the tweets in question had nothing to do with the debunked conspiracy theories surrounding Scarborough and his late congressional aide, who in 2001 died after suffering a fall from an undiagnosed heart condition. Instead, the ignominious honor belonged to Trump’s false claims that mail-in voting would lead to rampant voter fraud.

    The move drew more questions than praise. Why not simply remove the tweets pushing a vile murder conspiracy, as the widower of Scarborough’s late staffer pleaded in a letter to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey? Even top Republicans, who have remained silent about Trump’s smears against Scarborough, would have been unlikely to object to the removal of accusations so clearly false and defamatory. Why instead wade into a more politically divisive territory such as mail-in voting practices?

    #Twitter #Trump #Fake_news

  • Jared Kushner Had One Job: Solve America’s Supply Crisis. He Helped Private Companies Instead. – Mother Jones
    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/05/jared-kushner-had-one-job-solve-americas-supply-crisis-he-helped-privat

    The short-lived Project Airbridge is an example of how the Trump administration has taken advantage of the pandemic to boost some of the country’s biggest companies while doing little more than offer hard-hit states photo ops and the chance to compete against each other to pay exorbitant prices for PPE. And while the project did little to ameliorate national shortages of PPE, it may have a lasting impact on everything from health care costs to the consolidation of corporate power.

    The companies involved in Project Airbridge are some of the biggest in the world, including McKesson, Cardinal Health, Medline, and Henry Schein. They are the huge intermediaries of the health care system, distributors of prescription drugs and medical supplies, which they buy from wholesalers and then sell to hospitals, clinics, and government agencies. Yet through Project Airbridge, the Trump administration gave these enormous firms a sweetheart deal free of much if any oversight.

    #Trump #USA #collusion #marché_public #hôpital

  • The Trump Files: “Always Be Around Unsuccessful People,” Donald Recommends – Mother Jones
    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/09/trump-files-donald-recommends-always-be-around-unsuccessful-people

    Trump decided to give an audience at St. Norbert’s College in De Pere, Wisconsin, a lecture on success during a campaign appearance there on March 30. About halfway through, he turned to the topic of the kind of company that successful people should keep.

    “You’ll find, when you become very successful, the people that you will like best will be the people that are less successful than you,” he said, “because when you go to a table, you can tell them all these wonderful stories and they’ll sit back and listen. Does that make sense to you? Okay? Always be around unsuccessful people, because everybody will respect you.”

    Ironically, a popular businessman had once warned people about the dangers of only being able to hang around lesser lights. The businessman’s name? Donald Trump.

    “Some of the most successful people, I’ve noticed, can associate only with people less successful than themselves,” he wrote in Surviving at the Top, his 1990 book. “When they’re around someone who gets more attention than they do and has accomplished more than they have, they display a major personality complex, acting nervous and uneasy—and I’m sure they say vicious things behind the more successful person’s back.”

    #Trump #lol

  • We Need COVID-19 Treatments ASAP—But a Perverse Incentive Could Slow Pharma Breakthroughs – Mother Jones
    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/05/we-need-covid-19-treatments-asap-but-a-perverse-incentive-could-slow-ph

    A major clinical trial showed that an antiviral medication called remdesivir shortened the length of time that patients are sick with COVID-19, from an average of 15 days down to 11. The FDA had already rushed to approve research on the compound—an underperforming Ebola drug—and the agency is expected to authorize it for emergency use within a week. There are caveats: It’s not clear whether the drug reduces a patient’s risk of dying from the disease, and a small Chinese study showed no benefit. Still, doctors are hopeful that remdesivir will help reduce strain on hospitals and buy time for researchers to develop other treatments and a vaccine. In the meantime, remdesivir’s manufacturer, the pharmaceutical company Gilead, could save millions of lives and make billions of dollars.

    That’s how it’s supposed to work in the pharma world: Profit spurs innovation. But it doesn’t always happen that way. In fact, sometimes the opposite is true. Because of the perverse incentive structure of medical patents, Gilead has made billions of dollars by delaying development of its own HIV medication for the people who need it.

    #Big_Pharma

  • Navajo Nation Is Behind Only New York and New Jersey in Rates of COVID-19 Infection. What Happened? – Mother Jones
    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/05/navajo-nation-covid-outbreak-deaths

    With a population of 350,000 and territory encompassing over 27,000 square miles, the Navajo Nation is the largest Indigenous reservation in the country, bigger than West Virginia and nine other US states. Today, the rural community has more per-capita COVID-19 infections than any place outside of New York and New Jersey. In April, its rate of infection was 10 times higher than that of Arizona, which encircles most of the Nation. Since the first cases cropped up on the reservation more than one month ago, more than 2,373 people have been infected, and the death toll stands at 73—higher than those of 11 states. “The need for the Navajo is far greater than any other tribe I have seen,” says Rep. Deb Haaland (D-N.M.), whose district includes part of the reservation.

    The reasons for it expose how history and long-standing inequalities are shaping the way the disease attacks.

    Retour sur le colonialisme US et l’histoire de la nation navajo.

    So when the Navajo Times reported that the reservation’s outbreak likely began at the March 9 rally of a local chapter of an evangelical church, Solomon says, “everybody’s mindset immediately went right back to” the church’s role in colonizing the Navajo. Rumors began to swirl that white Christians had brought the virus, perhaps even intentionally, creating confusion about how the virus spreads and suspicion of information from the outside. “It brought back the mistrust, and a lot of bad memories. My parents, like other Diné people, became wary of the whole situation,” says Solomon, who prefers the term Diné as the Navajos’ traditional name for themselves. Even COVID-19 prevention measures felt like a form of colonialism. And as the virus became a growing concern across the country, awareness developed slowly on the reservation. Early news of the outbreak largely came through English-speaking media, which many Navajo either don’t read or don’t trust. Many elders on the reservation only speak the Navajo language, and even those who understand English prefer to receive information from particular local sources. “If they watch the news, it’s not really registering,” says Solomon. “But when they turn into KTNN,” a popular Navajo radio station, “they hear the medicine woman or the Navajo Nation president talking about it, and then it sinks in. When they’re talking about it in Navajo, in our language, it has more of an impact. I see that with my own parents.”

    Indian Health Service workers, school nurses, and community center officials could have done more to inform Navajo people about the importance of social distancing before their officials were forced to implement widespread closures and intense weekend-long curfews, says Solomon. She only began to hear KTNN feature local leaders on hand-washing, social distancing, and other mitigation measures around the start of April, long after such advisories became widespread elsewhere.

  • Here’s What to Say to Racist Family Members During the Holidays – Mother Jones
    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/11/ibram-kendi-antiracist-talk-to-racist-family-friends-holidays

    It’s holiday season! Which means it’s time to have some potentially awkward conversations with family, on top of the usual awkward conversations that dredge up old resentments and new disappointments. Lots has already been written about today’s polarized political climate, and if they want, people can more or less successfully avoid being in spaces that run completely counter to their core beliefs.

    But the family dinner table isn’t one of those places.