deux personnes exposées à une « substance inconnue » ont été hospitalisées

Ah ah ! On n’a pas leurs noms et on ne sait pas non plus si ce sont des agents doubles...
Complotisme des journaleux, les mêmes qui nous font la leçon sur les fake news à longueur d’année.
Que va dire le faux-intellectuel Thomas Huchon ?

Wiltshire incident: Police seal off parts of Salisbury and Amesbury as couple exposed to ’unknown substance’ fight for life | The Independent
▻https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/wiltshire-incident-latest-updates-amesbury-victims-salisbury-skripal-

https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2018/07/04/09/amesbury-incident.jpg

Asked about the latest incident in Amesbury, a government spokesman said: “Ministers are being kept up to date.”

Traduction française : on nage dans le potage…

Police say Wiltshire couple were poisoned by #novichok – video | UK news | The Guardian
▻https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/video/2018/jul/05/police-say-wiltshire-couple-were-poisoned-by-novichok-video

The poisoning of a couple in Wiltshire was caused by the nerve agent novichok, Britain’s top counter terrorism officer has announced.

The statement on Wednesday night by Scotland Yard assistant commissioner Neil Basu followed a day of mystery about what caused the collapse of the couple on Saturday, which was first thought to be drug related

#novitchok

Outre la brève, le point par le Guardian, avec, entre autres :

Novichok poisonings : UK points the finger at Russia | UK news | The Guardian
▻https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/jul/05/uk-points-russia-behind-second-wiltshire-novichok-poisoning

Asked if Russia could be responsible, [UK security minister, Ben] Wallace said: “Based on the evidence we had at the time of the Skripal attack, the knowledge they [Russia] had developed novichok, they had explored assassination programmes in the past, they had motive, form and stated policy, we would still assert to a very high assurance that the Russian state was behind the original attack.

The working assumption would be these are victims of the consequences of the previous attack or something else but not that they were directly targeted. That could change.”