Heart attacks among non-smokers fall by a QUARTER after ban stubs out passive smoking | Mail Online
►http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2194688/Heart-attacks-non-smokers-fall-QUARTER-ban-stubs-passive-smoking.html
A study in Germany found that the number of heart attacks in one city dropped by 26 per cent among non-smokers just two years after the ban came in.
comme quoi le tabagisme passif c’était pas de la connerie
Non, c’est faux, je dis que les articles qui reprennent une étude scientifique en donnant une unique cause responsable d’une énorme statistique c’est réputé mauvais et au minimum très approximatif, d’ou mon étonnement devant ce qui, vu le commentaire, semblait valider cela sans réserves.
Schmucker J et al, « Smoking ban and incidence of STEMI : non-smokers benefit most ? » European Heart Journal 2012
►http://www.bremer-herzen.de/_uploads/files/stemi-hub_en.pdf
The Bremen STEMI registry reveals over a time period of 4 years a reduction in the incidence of STEMI, which was at least partially associated with the commencement of an anti-smoking act. Independent of age and gender non-smokers benefit most from the smoking ban demonstrating the harmful effects of passive smoking.
« at least partially associated », donc, d’après le résumé de l’étude donnée en source…
10 personnes de plus qui ont des attaques sur quatre ans, je suis pas scientifique, mais ça parait faible comme base sur laquelle émettre des conclusions générales.
Do secondhand smoke laws prevent heart attacks? | Reuters
►http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/29/us-secondhand-smoke-idUSBRE89S15020121029
Heart attacks dropped by one-third in one county in Minnesota after two smoke-free workplace ordinances went into place, a new study shows.