The Angry Arab News Service/وكالة أنباء العربي الغاضب : Judith Butler : why so defensive, Judith ?

/judith-butler-why-so-defensive-judith.h

  • Angry Arab à propos de la réponse de Judith Butler :
    http://angryarab.blogspot.fr/2012/08/judith-butler-why-so-defensive-judith.html

    she said: “In my view, there are strong Jewish traditions, even early Zionist traditions, that value co-habitation and that offer ways to oppose violence of all kinds, including state violence.” This sentence is historically false. There are NO—NONE—early Zionist traditions that “value cohabitation and that offer ways to oppose violence of all kinds, including state violence”. There are none. When people—usually left Zionists—write words like that they usually are referring to the writings of either Ahad Ha’am or Martin Buber. But neither of them, nor together, represented “a Zionist tradition”. They were lone personalities and their entire body of writing don’t amount to what Butler is describing here.