Longue réponse (et c’est la première partie seulement) d’As‘ad AbuKhalil à l’article de Jamie Allinson sur le conflit syrien : Jamie Allinson’s “Leftist” take on the Syria conflict : a critique (Part I)
►http://english.al-akhbar.com/blogs/angry-corner/jamie-allinson’s-“leftist”-take-syria-conflict-critique-part-i
This dismissal by Allison can only imply that he believes that American and Western Zionists who are calling daily for more arms and NATO intervention to help the FSA gangs is motivated by real love for a real…revolution? By Allinson’s logic, Zionists and Salafis and Ikhwans are all part of a glorious revolution, which he believes has leftist features and objectives.
He ridicules the idea that the armed movement in Syria is an extension of US imperial policies, despite the fact that the US Congress has been dispensing millions upon millions of dollars to that movement. Does Allinson think that the US is merely charitably aiding a leftist revolution, without even knowing it? Does John McCain call for more arms for the Syrian revolution without knowing what Allinson knows: that it really is a leftist movement?
L’article d’Allinson est en ligne sur le New Left Project : Syria : Neither Riyadh nor Tehran but Popular Revolution
►http://www.newleftproject.org/index.php/site/article_comments/syria_neither_riyadh_nor_tehran_but_popular_revolution