• Jewish Israelis should cast a solidarity vote for the Arab Joint List - Opinion
    Gideon Levy | Sep 15, 2019 3:45 AM | Haaretz.com
    https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-jewish-israelis-should-cast-a-solidarity-vote-for-the-arab-joint-l

    Reminder No. 1: There are such things as solidarity and identification, even if it’s been a long time since we’ve heard anything about them. Reminder No. 2: Israel’s Arab citizens are a constant target for attack, exclusion and humiliation, especially in this campaign season.

    Reminder No. 3: In the end, in the privacy of the voting booth, after all the strategy and tactics are stripped away, voters face their conscience and choose the party nearest their heart. Voting is a very personal act of free expression, of self-determination, emotion, intelligence, morality and identity. This prologue leads of course to an attempt to persuade people to vote for the Joint List on Tuesday.

    Very few Israeli Jews can imagine what it means to be an Arab in Israel. To speak Arabic on the bus, to wear a hijab on the train, to face insults from the media and on the street, to try to rent out an apartment in Tel Aviv, to see your brothers trampled under the brutal boot of your state. No Jew in the world lives under such conditions today. Your language is anathema, your identity is erased, your past doesn’t exist, your catastrophe didn’t happen, your existence here is conditional and you’re always suspect; your brother is your enemy and you’re a fifth column.

    The current campaign season has brought the incitement to a new nadir. To the right, one-fifth of the population is a vote-getting punching bag — nothing today is more popular, more unifying, than sowing anti-Arab hatred. The political center takes part in the revelry of incitement as well. It too says it won’t join a coalition that includes the Arabs. In Israel, the Kahanists and the neo-Nazis have more political legitimacy than the Arabs do.

    The battle is over excluding them from parliamentary life, over delegitimization to the point of making them illegal. A Jewish Knesset isn’t only a Judgment Day nightmare, it’s a vision that’s approaching. Another term or two and we’re there. Even now the Knesset has only 110 lawmakers de facto. No one counts the 10 Arab MKs. The questions asked about them, such as whether they’re permitted to serve on the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, would be disallowed in any legislature around the world if they were asked about Jews, for example.

    The possibility of joining the government that Joint List Chairman Ayman Odeh raised was roundly dismissed by the main parties. Yisrael Beiteinu Chairman Avigdor Lieberman, the great hope of the left, wasn’t expelled from the Knesset chamber in disgrace when he refused to sit next to a Joint List MK. Imagine what would happen to a European or an American legislator who refused to sit next to a Jew. Israel’s prime minister and public security minister call the elected representatives of the country’s Arab citizens “terror supporters” and “terrorists.”

    One can be ashamed by this behavior and not lift a finger, and one can do the only thing that has a chance of ending it, or at least send a signal to Israel’s Arab citizens that they are not alone. The size of the Joint List’s Knesset representation won’t change the country’s fortunes; it will be the third-largest — and the least important. What’s important is that as many Jews as possible vote for it. That will be a genuine protest vote against the right and against racism, a concrete demonstration of solidarity with the oppressed.

    Israel’s Arabs deserve and need this. They deserve to know that not everyone is Public Security Minister Gilad Erdan. The Arab doctor in the hospital, the nurse, the pharmacist in the drugstore, the waiter, the construction worker who’s building the country, they all deserve to know that they’re not alone in their country and in their state. To know that Israel will never expel them, as many would like to do. Tens of thousands of Jewish votes for their representatives are the way to send the message. The war against apartheid begins with this small step.

    It’s permissible for deep and justified feelings of shame to be a factor in an election. It’s permissible to show solidarity with the weak and set aside all the other considerations — the desire to create a powerful party, a powerful bloc — whose importance can’t be calculated accurately. It’s permissible and necessary to show the Arab cities of Sakhnin and Nazareth, as well as the nearby Jewish cities of Afula and Nof Hagalil (formerly Upper Nazareth) that there is a different Israel, one that won’t continue to remain silent and do nothing.

    https://seenthis.net/messages/801471
    #Palestine #Élections #Liste_unifiée

    • Israeli politicians all lie, but only one of them has a vision - Opinion - Israel News
      Shlomo Sand Sep 13, 2019 | Haaretz.com
      https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-they-all-lie-but-only-one-of-them-has-a-vision-1.7837570

      Everyone knows the joke that goes: How can you tell when a politician is lying? The standard answer is, When he s moving his lips. Nowadays one could also say, Whenever he writes something on Twitter. In an election period, the lies are even more noticeable and frequent because the politicians are making more public statements than usual.

      The fools among us believe the promises, and the smarter ones know that in every liberal democracy, lying is built into the political battle for power. This doesn’t mean that everyone lies to the same extent, and it certainly isn’t to say that because of all the lies, one should boycott the election. The world can’t be changed through an election, but at the very least it can help to halt a perilous slide and sometimes even to avert a disaster.

      Israeli politicians have worked hard this year. With two successive election campaigns, they had to lie more than ever. A few days from now, they’ll be able to rest and lie a little bit less. The winners will secretly laugh at their voters; the losers will secretly curse their stupidity.

      But nearly all Israeli politicians are aware that the current election propaganda is not addressing – directly or indirectly – the elephant in the room: the future of Israeli-Palestinian relations. Of course the Joint List and Yamina are expressing clear positions on these relations, but all the other parties know full well that the historic argument about peace with the Palestinians has long been tabled from the national agenda, and so they intentionally remain vague and elusive on the subject.

      Many people think this might be true of the other parties, but not of the Democratic Union, where many still believe in making peace and its No. 10 candidate, despite his relatively low spot on the list, has “been permitted” to publicly express his position on the matter. According to the speeches and articles written by Ehud Barak, including in this newspaper, the Democratic Union’s peace platform seeks to outline a border between Israel and “Palestine” with or without a regional agreement. But where is the Palestinian leader who will agree to sign such a territorial peace agreement? Hasn’t he learned anything from the past?

      The present election will not decide the future of relations between Israelis and Palestinians, so the Democratic Union’s positions on this topic are not relevant. This election is about ridding the country of a corrupt, populist leader whose alliance with the nationalist right is accelerating the moral rot of governance in Israel. While one source of this rot is the ongoing apartheid situation, it is also a consequence of the worldwide crisis of values that has put people like Trump, Erdogan, Modi, Putin, Orban, Boris Johnson and others in power.

      In Israeli political culture, a government based on nationalist populism is particularly dangerous because of the strong racial components of the country’s national identity. So electoral puritanism is not the answer. Any attempt to block a victory for the Netanyahu-Ayelet Shaked-Betzalel Smotrich alliance should be welcomed by anyone who cares about the country’s immediate future, no matter which opposition party he chooses.

      And anyone thinking more about the long run should vote for the Joint List. Despite its ideological drawbacks, it is the only party that features no former defense ministers, each of whom had their turn at bolstering and perpetuating the occupation and the settlements. It is also the only one that offers a vision, even if it’s not practical at the moment, of a fair and historic compromise between the Israeli people and the Palestinian people.

      Shlomo Sand is a professor emeritus of history.