/2020

  • The tech ‘solutions’ for coronavirus take the surveillance state to the next level
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/15/tech-coronavirus-surveilance-state-digital-disrupt

    The role of the digital revolutionaries is to disrupt everything but the central institution of modern life : the market In a matter of weeks, coronavirus has shuttered the global economy and placed capitalism in intensive care. Many thinkers have expressed hope that it will usher in a more humane economic system ; others warn that the pandemic heralds a darker future of techno-totalitarian state surveillance. The dated cliches from the pages of 1984 are no longer a reliable guide to what (...)

    #Apple #Google #Microsoft #Palantir #Tesla #Vodafone #Amazon #algorithme #smartphone #géolocalisation #technologisme #domination #BigData (...)

    ##surveillance
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/d0cd0135fecb11a74770a4de7e769d1c9838d0d0/0_0_2560_1536/master/2560.jpg

  • After coronavirus, black and brown people must be at the heart of Britain’s story | Afua Hirsch | Opinion | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/may/07/coronavirus-black-brown-people-britain-ethnic-minorities
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/ae89105fc48c9be5a5ed542078d3e1fdb9b40535/0_66_4039_2424/master/4039.jpg?width=1200&height=630&quality=85&auto=format&fit=crop&overlay-ali

    But there was one fundamental problem. The millions of Africans, Asians and other people who came to be regarded as “ethnic minorities” (though they weren’t a minority in the empire) – and who made both this wartime victory, and the new welfare state institutions possible – were not part of the story. And what followed shows that when you exclude people from the narrative, they become excluded in real life. The idea of being entitled to a share in Britishness, and its national wealth, erased the contribution of black, Asian and ethnic minority people. And, over the decades that followed, the breakdown of the social contract – as the state remorselessly cut back its spending and stopped fulfilling its side of the bargain – was blamed on the presence of those visible, allegedly unentitled “outsiders”.
    It’s beyond ironic that black and Asian people in Britain underpinned the creation of the institutions that so often define Britishness, not least the NHS. Yet that same postwar era also laid the foundations for the inadequate access to healthcare, housing and secure labour that must be part of the reason why minorities are so disproportionately affected by today’s coronavirus crisis.

    #Covid-19#migrant#migration#diaspora#minorités#GrandeBretagne#NHS#invisibles#santé-nationale#crise-sanitaire

  • There’s no such thing as just ’following the science’ – coronavirus advice is political | Jana Bacevic | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/28/theres-no-such-thing-just-following-the-science-coronavirus-advice-poli

    To begin with, there is no such thing as the “best science available”. Scientists regularly disagree about different issues, from theoretical approaches to methodologies and findings, and decisions about what kind of scientific advice is taken into account are highly political.

    Politicians tend to favour the kind of science that aligns with their existing preferences. In the worst case, this can lead to cherrypicking data, pejoratively called “policy-based evidence”. But it needn’t be that extreme. For instance, studies suggesting a very high transmission rate for Covid-19 have been coming out of China since January, and Neil Ferguson, whose team was behind the study cited as precipitating Britain’s change of course in managing the pandemic, first sent his report to a Cobra meeting on 24 January. In February, studies suggesting that a substantial proportion of Covid-19 cases may be asymptomatic appeared in scientific journals. Evidence supporting general social distancing was already there. It took a political change of direction for this kind of data to be presented as “the science”.

    This tells us something important about the social nature of scientific knowledge. Scientific models are estimates, not oracles. Scientists can tell politicians the conditions under which their models are likely to work, but they are not responsible for creating those conditions. Blaming epidemiologists for the consequences of the government’s Covid-19 strategy is like blaming climate scientists for not preventing the climate crisis. Scientists can provide evidence, but acting on that evidence requires political will.

  • Contact apps won’t end lockdown. But they might kill off democracy | John Naughton | Opinion | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/25/contact-apps-wont-end-lockdown-but-they-might-kill-off-democracy

    A tech solution to the crisis of the type being pursed by the UK government will be both ineffective and a civil rights nightmare Repeat after me : there is no magic bullet for getting us through this pandemic. And smartphone-based proximity-sensing is definitely not that bullet, though it might be useful if two conditions are met. One is that it’s perceived by citizens to be trustworthy and protects their privacy ; the other is that it’s deployed in conjunction with a massive increase in (...)

    #surveillance #santé #COVID-19 #BigData #technologisme #GPS #géolocalisation #smartphone #Bluetooth #contactTracing (...)

    ##santé ##algorithme
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/d292c8666b5f56825313835ab305b8eaf02445ec/0_77_3500_2100/master/3500.jpg

  • Donald Trump’s prescription for coronavirus: quite literally toxic | Marina Hyde | Opinion | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/24/donald-trump-coronavirus-president-advice-bleach

    Even so, it is increasingly impossible to see Trump himself as anything other than a diagnostic agent, a sort of barium meal run through the system to test the strength of the US checks and balances. They are … how to put this sufficiently plainly? … failing. Indeed, the word failing itself feels like it’s failing, given the sheer weight of deficiency and dereliction it is currently being required to bear.

    #bouillie_barytée :-)

  • For non-intrusive tracking of Covid-19, smartphones have to be smarter | John Naughton | Opinion | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/11/for-non-intrusive-tracking-of-covid-19-smartphones-have-to-be-smarter

    Monitoring the pandemic with personal technology is a thorny issue. We can get results without having our privacy on parade On the weekend of March 20-21 news organisations in the US and elsewhere were reporting that beaches in Florida were thronged with holidaymakers, none of whom seemed to be observing any kind of social distancing. “If I get corona, I get corona. At the end of the day, I’m not going to let it stop me from partying,” one reveller told a reporter in Miami, conveying the (...)

    #biopolitique #algorithme #contactTracing #COVID-19 #smartphone #surveillance #santé

    ##santé
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/839db6a711fe6ea7f044ed98bc33b6ec636a9df7/45_60_5345_3207/master/5345.jpg

  • Coronavirus does discriminate, because that’s what humans do, Rebecca Solnit, TheGuardian, April 17, 2020
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/apr/17/coronavirus-discriminate-humans-racism-sexism-inequality

    It has also become clear that health disparities due to racism increased the chances of becoming severely ill or dying. From New Orleans to Chicago, black people were at disproportionate risk of death. Higher levels of diabetes and hypertension can be linked to the stress of racism; asthma and respiratory problems are tied to the polluted air of many urban and industrial areas; and lack of long-term access to good medical care and food sources (due to poverty and discrimination) play their part.

  • Coronavirus has not suspended politics – it has revealed the nature of power

    In a lockdown, we can see the essence of politics is still what #Hobbes described: some people get to tell others what to do.
    We keep hearing that this is a war. Is it really? What helps to give the current crisis its wartime feel is the apparent absence of normal political argument. The prime minister goes on TV to issue a sombre statement to the nation about the curtailment of our liberties and the leader of the opposition offers nothing but support. Parliament, insofar as it is able to operate at all, appears to be merely going through the motions. People are stuck at home, and their fights are limited to the domestic sphere. There is talk of a government of national unity. Politics-as-usual has gone missing.

    But this is not the suspension of politics. It is the stripping away of one layer of political life to reveal something more raw underneath. In a democracy we tend to think of politics as a contest between different parties for our support. We focus on the who and the what of political life: who is after our votes, what they are offering us, who stands to benefit. We see elections as the way to settle these arguments. But the bigger questions in any democracy are always about the how: how will governments exercise the extraordinary powers we give them? And how will we respond when they do?

    These are the questions that have always preoccupied political theorists. But now they are not so theoretical. As the current crisis shows, the primary fact that underpins political existence is that some people get to tell others what to do. At the heart of all modern politics is a trade-off between personal liberty and collective choice. This is the Faustian bargain identified by the philosopher Thomas Hobbes in the middle of the 17th century, when the country was being torn apart by a real civil war.

    As Hobbes knew, to exercise political rule is to have the power of life and death over citizens. The only reason we would possibly give anyone that power is because we believe it is the price we pay for our collective safety. But it also means that we are entrusting life-and-death decisions to people we cannot ultimately control.
    Coronavirus: the week explained - sign up for our email newsletter
    Read more

    The primary risk is that those on the receiving end refuse to do what they are told. At that point, there are only two choices. Either people are forced to obey, using the coercive powers the state has at its disposal. Or politics breaks down altogether, which Hobbes argued was the outcome we should fear most of all.

    In a democracy, we have the luxury of waiting for the next election to punish political leaders for their mistakes. But that is scant consolation when matters of basic survival are at stake. Anyway, it’s not much of a punishment, relatively speaking. They might lose their jobs, though few politicians wind up destitute. We might lose our lives.

    The rawness of these choices is usually obscured by the democratic imperative to seek consensus. That has not gone away. The government is doing all it can to dress up its decisions in the language of commonsense advice. It says it is still trusting individuals to show sound judgment. But as the experience of other European countries shows, as the crisis deepens the stark realities become clearer. Just watch the footage of Italian mayors screaming at their constituents to stay at home. “Vote for me or the other lot get in” is routine democratic politics. “Do this or else” is raw democratic politics. At that point it doesn’t look so different from politics of any other kind.

    This crisis has revealed some other hard truths. National governments really matter, and it really matters which one you happen to find yourself under. Though the pandemic is a global phenomenon, and is being experienced similarly in many different places, the impact of the disease is greatly shaped by decisions taken by individual governments. Different views about when to act and how far to go still mean that no two nations are having the same experience. At the end of it all we may get to see who was right and what was wrong. But for now, we are at the mercy of our national leaders. That is something else Hobbes warned about: there is no avoiding the element of arbitrariness at the heart of all politics. It is the arbitrariness of individual political judgment.

    Under a lockdown, democracies reveal what they have in common with other political regimes: here too politics is ultimately about power and order. But we are also getting to see some of the fundamental differences. It is not that democracies are nicer, kinder, gentler places. They may try to be, but in the end that doesn’t last. Democracies do, though, find it harder to make the really tough choices. Pre-emption – the ability to tackle a problem before it becomes acute – has never been a democratic strength. We wait until we have no choice and then we adapt. That means democracies are always going to start off behind the curve of a disease like this one, though some are better at playing catch-up than others.

    Autocratic regimes such as China also find it hard to face up to crises until they have to – and, unlike democracies, they can suppress the bad news for longer if it suits them. But when action becomes unavoidable, they can go further. The Chinese lockdown succeeded in containing the disease through ruthless pre-emption. Democracies are capable of being equally ruthless – as they showed when prosecuting the total wars of the 20th century.

    But in a war, the enemy is right in front of you. During this pandemic the disease reveals where it has got to only in the daily litany of infections and deaths. Democratic politics becomes a kind of shadow boxing: the state doesn’t know which bodies are the really dangerous ones.
    It’s right that parliament shuts – but democracy can’t be suspended
    Polly Toynbee
    Polly Toynbee
    Read more

    Some democracies have managed to adapt faster: in South Korea the disease is being tamed by extensive tracing and widespread surveillance of possible carriers. But in that case, the regime had recent experience to draw on in its handling of the Mers outbreak of 2015, which also shaped the collective memory of its citizens. Israel may also be doing a better job than many European countries – but it is a society already on a permanent warlike footing. It is easier to adapt when you have adapted already. It is much harder when you are making it up as you go along.

    In recent years, it has sometimes appeared that global politics is simply a choice between rival forms of technocracy. In China, it is a government of engineers backed up by a one-party state. In the west, it is the rule of economists and central bankers, operating within the constraints of a democratic system. This creates the impression that the real choices are technical judgments about how to run vast, complex economic and social systems.

    But in the last few weeks another reality has pushed through. The ultimate judgments are about how to use coercive power. These aren’t simply technical questions. Some arbitrariness is unavoidable. And the contest in the exercise of that power between democratic adaptability and autocratic ruthlessness will shape all of our futures. We are a long way from the frightening and violent world that Hobbes sought to escape nearly 400 years ago. But our political world is still one Hobbes would recognise.

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/27/coronavirus-politics-lockdown-hobbes
    #pouvoir #politique #coronavirus #covid-19 #confinement

  • Coronavirus has shattered the myth that the economy must come first

    Since the 1990s, faith in ‘the market’ has gone unchallenged. Now even public shopping has become a crime against society.

    The coronavirus shutdown of 2020 is perhaps the most remarkable interruption to ordinary life in modern history. It has been spoken about as a war. And one is reminded of the stories told of the interruption of normality in 1914 and 1939. But unlike a war, the present moment involves demobilisation not mobilisation. While the hospitals are on full alert, the majority of us are confined to quarters. We are deliberately inducing one of the most severe recessions ever seen. In so doing we are driving another nail into the coffin of one of the great platitudes of the late 20th century: it’s the economy stupid.
    Coronavirus shows the folly of stripping state and society to the bone
    Neal Lawson
    Read more

    Once upon a time we thought we knew what was up and what was down. According to the lingua franca of the 1990s, in the wake of the cold war, it was obvious that the economics were the fundamentals, and the rest followed. It was the west’s economic success that felled communism. And the economy ruled not only over creaky communist dictatorships, it defined the scope of possible politics in democracies. Arguing against globalisation, Tony Blair insisted, was as absurd as arguing against the seasons.

    Then came 2008 and we were left wondering who the economic masters of the universe actually were. It was followed by the extraordinary, politically induced catastrophe of the eurozone debt crisis, in which conservative fiscal populism and dogma – disguised as expertise – ruled over the need to ensure employment and grow the pie. Then in 2016 the UK referendum delivered a majority for Brexit in the face of predictions of economic disaster. Months later, Donald Trump, a narcissistic billionaire, was swept to power by working-class votes in the face of opposition by the great and the good. Both the UK and the US have since pursued policies of spectacular economic irrationality without fear of a crushing veto by the markets. Liberal elites waited in vain for the market vigilantes to arrive.

    And now Covid-19. Imagine if blunt economic interest was, in fact, dictating our response. Would we be shutting the economy down? What we know about the virus tells us that it most often kills what are by the numbers the “least productive” members of society. The majority of the working population experience symptoms barely more significant than a regular flu. Unlike regular flus it does not threaten children, the future workers. The virus may be bad, but simplistic economic logic would dictate that until we have a vaccine it would be best to keep life going, because, you know, “it’s the economy stupid”.
    Coronavirus: the week explained - sign up for our email newsletter
    Read more

    That was indeed the first reaction of the British government. The headline was that Britain was staying open for business. Journalists with good memories dug up Boris Johnson’s fondness for the mayor in Steven Spielberg’s Jaws who insists that despite the fact that a sea monster is eating his constituents the beach should stay open. The higher wisdom of public health, we were told, was that the productive workforce would acquire immunity. We know how that bold experiment in heroic economism has ended: a panic-driven withdrawal in the face of the disastrous scenario of hundreds of thousands of excess deaths, overwhelmed NHS hospitals and a crisis of political legitimacy.

    It suddenly became obvious that when matters of life and death are concerned the calculus is different. Of course, old and sick people die. We all will in due course. But it matters fundamentally how and under what circumstances. A huge surge in mortality, even if it is limited to “vulnerable” populations with pre-existing conditions, is existentially unsettling. So too are the apocalyptic scenes that will unfold in our hospitals. In an earlier age, they might have remained behind a decent veil of obscurity. (No doubt the NHS and the BBC will work out the protocols for “embedded” reporting from the clinical frontlines.) But the words and images that have already come to us from northern Italy and Wuhan are bad enough. Faced with all of this, the stupidity lies in not recognising promptly that we must act, that we must shut down, that even the most essential individual activity of the market age, public shopping, has mutated into a crime against society.

    This is not to say that economics is not shaping the crisis. It is the relentless expansion of the Chinese economy and the resulting mix of modern urban life with traditional food customs that creates the viral incubators. It is globalised transportation systems that speed up transmission. It is calculations of cost that define the number of intensive-care beds and the stockpiles of ventilators. It is the commercial logic of drug development that defines the range of vaccines we have ready and waiting; obscure coronaviruses don’t get the same attention as erectile dysfunction. And once the virus began to spread, it was the UK’s attachment to business as usual that induced fatal delay. Shutting down comes at a price. No one wants to do it. But then it turns out, in the face of the terrifying predictions of sickness and death, there really is no alternative.

    It is once you have overcome that political, intellectual and existential hurdle – to realise that this is a matter of life and death – that economics enters back in. And it does so with a vengeance. The logic revealed by the well-organised Asian states is that it is best to conduct a severe quarantine regime in the hope of being able to return to normal activity as soon as possible. The Chinese economy is already resuming step by step.

    In the west, the scale and breadth of the epidemic is such that our response now will have to be a blanket shutdown. And that begs gigantic questions of economic management. Even conservative governments on both sides of the Atlantic are pulling every lever of monetary and fiscal policy. In a matter of weeks they have embarked on gigantic interventions on a scale comparable to those in 2008. They may be able to soften the blow. But it is an open question how long we will be able to persist, how long we will be able to freeze the economy to save lives.

    In making the difficult choices that lie ahead we have at least gained one degree of freedom. The big idea of the 1990s that “the economy” will serve as a regulating superego of our politics is a busted flush. Given the experience of the past dozen years we should now never tire of asking: which economic constraints are real and which imagined?

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/20/coronavirus-myth-economy-uk-business-life-death
    #économie #economy_first #priorité #santé #coronavirus #covid-19

  • Why do rightwing populist leaders oppose experts? | Jan-Werner Müller | Opinion | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/26/rightwing-populist-leaders-oppose-experts-not-elites

    it’s not true that today’s rightwing populists are indiscriminately against all elites. They only denounce professionals. Trump supporters did not find it scandalous that his cabinet was full of Wall Street figures. (...) professionals who claim authority on the basis of education and special licensing – think lawyers, doctors and professors. Such figures can automatically be maligned by rightwing culture warriors as “condescending” – after all, they tell other people what to do, because they claim to know better.

  • Smartphones could help us track the coronavirus – but at what cost ? | John Naughton | Opinion | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/21/smartphones-could-help-track-coronavirus-but-at-what-cost

    It’s wise to be wary of the government adopting intrusive apps that monitor the effectiveness of public health measures As we confront the pandemic, we’re flying blind, like pilots in 1930s aeroplanes flying through fog. That, at any rate, is what I take away from reading John Ioannidis, a Stanford professor who is an expert in epidemiology, population health, biomedical data science and statistics. Covid-19, he writes, in a startling article, “has been called a once-in-a-century pandemic. But (...)

    #smartphone #anti-terrorisme #géolocalisation #BigData #PatriotAct #santé #surveillance

    ##santé
    https://i.guim.co.uk/img/media/57e235517037996cf658ee0d130356ce379382e8/0_115_4057_2435/master/4057.jpg

  • Germany’s coronavirus anomaly: high infection rates but few deaths | Financial Times
    https://www.ft.com/content/c0755b30-69bb-11ea-800d-da70cff6e4d3
    https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/http%3A%2F%2Fprod-upp-image-read.ft.com%2F46513784-69e8-11ea-a6ac-9122541af204?s

    In one crucial way, however, the country is proving remarkably resilient: relative to known infections, the number of deaths has so far been minuscule.

    According to data from Johns Hopkins University, there were 13,979 coronavirus infections in Germany on Thursday afternoon, more than in any other country except China, Italy, Iran and Spain.

    According to Lothar Wieler, the president of the Robert Koch Institute, German laboratories are now conducting about 160,000 coronavirus tests every week — more than some European countries have carried out in total since the crisis started. Even South Korea, which is conducting 15,000 tests a day and has been held up by virologists as an example to follow, appears to be testing less than Germany.

    “This is about capacity. The capacity in Germany is very, very significant. We can conduct more than 160,000 tests per week, and that can be increased further,” Prof Wieler told journalists this week. Test capabilities would be boosted not least in part by switching laboratories that specialise in animal health towards coronavirus checks. There was no sign that test kits were running low, Prof Wieler added.

    In the short term at least, mass testing feeds through into a lower fatality rate because it allows authorities to detect cases of Covid-19 even in patients who suffer few or no symptoms, and who have a much better chance of survival. It also means that Germany is likely to have a lower number of undetected cases than countries where testing is less prevalent.

  • In one Italian town, we showed mass testing could eradicate the coronavirus

    By identifying and isolating clusters of infected people, we wiped out Covid-19 in Vò.

    It’s now about one month since Covid-19 began to sweep across Italy. With more than total cases topping 40,000 as of 19 March, it is now the worst-affected country outside of China.

    But in the last two weeks, a promising pilot study here has produced results that may be instructive for other countries trying to control coronavirus. Beginning on 6 March , along with researchers at the University of Padua and the Red Cross, we tested all residents of Vò, a town of 3,000 inhabitants near Venice – including those who did not have symptoms. This allowed us to quarantine people before they showed signs of infection and stop the further spread of coronavirus. In this way, we eradicated coronavirus in under 14 days.
    Scientists say mass tests in Italian town have halted Covid-19 there
    Read more

    While we believe it is too late to enact this approach in a city such as Milan, where infections are out of control, there could still be time to do this in the UK before the crisis gets even worse: the government could identify and isolate clusters, quarantine everyone affected, trace their recent contacts, and quarantine and isolate them, too – whether they had symptoms or not.

    Our experiment came to be by chance. The Italian authorities had a strong emotional reaction to news of the country’s first death – which was in Vò. The whole town was put into quarantine and every inhabitant was tested. The tests were processed by us at the University of Padua. It became clear that this was a unique epidemiological setting – and an application was put in to keep the town in lockdown and run a second round of tests after nine days.

    In the first round of testing, 89 people tested positive. In the second round, the number had dropped to six, who remained in isolation. In this way, we managed to eradicate coronavirus from Vò, achieving a 100% recovery rate for those previously infected while recording no further cases of transmission.

    We made an interesting finding: at the time the first symptomatic case was diagnosed, a significant proportion of the population, about 3%, had already been infected – yet most of them were completely asymptomatic. Our study established a valuable principle: testing of all citizens, whether or not they have symptoms, provides a way to control this pandemic.

    The nature of this crisis means that establishing a structured response like this is key, while widespread testing is crucial in telling an accurate story of how many people are affected, and what the mortality rate of the virus actually is. In Italy, we have struggled with a rampant rise of mortality (the number of casualties divided by the number of infected people), which has reached an apparent value of 8% – far higher than the mortality rate in China and grimly close to that during the 2002-2003 Sars outbreak.
    Coronavirus: the week explained - sign up for our email newsletter
    Read more

    This high rate is misleading, though. After the first few days of the initial outbreak, cases were classed as all of those found to be infected by the virus. Yet since then, only the obviously symptomatic subjects – those needing medical care – have been tested for the virus and thus counted as cases.

    The decision to only test those who presented for treatment with symptoms of the virus was taken by major Italian public health experts, apparently in line with World Health Organization (WHO) suggestions. The consequence has been that people who haven’t asked for medical attention have only been tested very occasionally in Italy. Nonetheless, asymptomatic or quasi-symptomatic subjects represent a good 70% of all virus-infected people and, still worse, an unknown, yet impossible to ignore portion of them can transmit the virus to others. Full testing would give us a clearer picture of how many people actually have the virus, and how many pass it on.

    If the fact that only those presenting with the virus were being tested was accounted for, the mortality percentage would fall to more “normal” levels. This is shown by the mortality in the Veneto region, which is steadily around 2.5-3%, still high but threefold less than the ones in Lombardy and Emilia-Romagna.

    Why this marked difference? Veneto is comparable to the other two northern regions for education, general lifestyle, personal income and age of the population – all factors, particularly the last one, believed to influence Covid-19 mortality. Although a non-homogeneous data collection and other variables could explain the difference, there is one main factor that is likely playing a role. In Veneto, the virus was more actively sought out through testing, a programme that included part of the asymptomatic population. Official numbers speak of roughly eight in every 100 people tested in Veneto, against about half and one-third of that proportion in Lombardy and Emila-Romagna, respectively.

    Unfortunately, it would be near impossible to repeat this model in a large city, due to the number of people who would need to be tested. However, our findings warrant careful consideration by health policymakers in Italy and around the world. They invite researchers to eradicate the virus through extensive testing of both symptomatic individuals and all of their social contacts – including relatives, friends and neighbours. In this way, we catch out the disease before it has the chance to spread – and, most importantly, before the carrier has the chance to unwittingly pass it on to other people.

    In the absence of specific therapies or a vaccine, quarantine, distancing and identification of asymptomatic carriers remain the only real measures to control this epidemic. In the UK, authorities could still identify and isolate clusters, and test everyone who has come into contact with those infected. Wisely, though probably belatedly, WHO has just this week recommended what we have found in our research to be the best line of defence: testing, testing, testing.

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/20/eradicated-coronavirus-mass-testing-covid-19-italy-vo?CMP=Share_iOSApp_
    #Italie #dépistage #tests #coronavirus #covid-19 #dépistage_de_masse #

    • COVID-19 isolation could create ‘fertile ground for domestic violence’

      On the day that France’s President Emmanuel Macron announced sweeping plans to go into a 15-day period of enforced lockdown from Tuesday, concerns also arose as to the potential increase in cases of gender-based domestic violence, following a previous surge in China under similar conditions.

      “The crisis that we are going through and the quarantine could unfortunately create a fertile ground of domestic violence,” read a statement from France’s Secretary of State in charge of Gender Equality, Marlène Schiappa, adding that with the new quarantine measures in France, “the situation of emergency shelters for female victims of domestic violence is a major concern.”

      The statement also recognised that although courts in France are on lockdown, domestic violence cases are still open and being dealt with, and that the government website, Arretons Les Violences is still online, but that the ‘3919’ emergency hotline service for domestic violence victims will be operating under a reduced service.

      It is understood the state department will hold talks with the Fédération Nationale Solidarité Femmes on Wednesday to discuss the possibility of keeping the line open.

      The French Feminist collective NousToutes also recently highlighted the potential risk of domestic violence cases rising as a result of enforced isolation and called upon victims to make use of the 3919 emergency hotline.

      “Being confined at home with a violent man is dangerous. It is not recommended to go out. It is not forbidden to flee. Need help? Call 3919,” a statement from the group on Twitter read.

      Not forgetting the victims

      Due to the potential stress on public services as part of France’s ongoing battle against the coronavirus outbreak, some in Europe have been calling for the authorities to make sure that the authorities do not lose sight of the work they do in tackling domestic violence.

      Amandine Clavaud, policy adviser on Europe and gender equality at the Fondation Jean-Jaurès in Paris told EURACTIV that there is a need for an increase in vigilance on behalf of public bodies, with regards to these types of issues.

      “We have to be very attentive to the risks towards women and children amid this crisis, because the work of associations will possibly slow down with the quarantine,” she said.

      “In the case where public services reach saturation point, the treatments of domestic violence cases should definitely not be left-behind, but fully part of the whole strategy in dealing with the crisis.”

      Crisis abuse cases

      Concerns have arisen both in the United States and China with regards to the increase in domestic violence cases that could occur as a result of people in abusive relationships being forced to isolate together, and rights groups in Europe have now started to sound the horn over potential blindspots in this area.

      “In times of crisis and natural disasters, there is a documented rise in domestic abuse. As normal life shuts down, victims – who are usually women – can be exposed to abusers for long periods of time and cut off from social and institutional support,” the European Institute for Gender Equality’s Jurgita Pečiūrienė told EURACTIV.

      “The financial insecurity that often prohibits domestic violence victims from leaving abusers can also worsen in the aftermath of a crisis,” Pečiūrienė, who specialises in gender-based research, said.

      She added that there is a worrying deficit of data in the EU with regards to information sharing in the context of home-based violence amid national crises.

      “A lack of data in Europe prevents countries from learning from each other to ensure police and other support services can adapt to changing patterns of domestic violence in times of crisis,” she said.

      China & the US

      The measures imposed by the Chinese government in response to the COVID-19 outbreak for citizens to self-isolate for 14 days led to a surge in the recorded instances of domestic violence, according to reports from activists working in the country, as well as employees as women’s shelters.

      Meanwhile stateside, a statement released by the US National Domestic Abuse Hotline over the weekend noted that domestic violence abusers may seek to capitalise on the forced measures for domestic violence sufferers to isolate themselves.

      “Abuse is about power and control. When survivors are forced to stay in the home or in close proximity to their abuser more frequently, an abuser can use any tool to exert control over their victim, including a national health concern such as COVID-19,” the statement read.

      “In a time where companies may be encouraging that their employees work remotely, and the CDC is encouraging “social distancing,” an abuser may take advantage of an already stressful situation to gain more control.”

      https://www.euractiv.com/section/coronavirus/news/covid-19-isolation-could-create-fertile-ground-for-domestic-violence

      signalé par @isskein

    • Je partage ici les pensées d’une amie. Je ne sais pas si elle veut que son nom soit dévoilé, je laisse donc son témoignage (que j’ai reçu par email, le 18.03.2020) de manière anonyme, car elle pose des pensées qui sont très importantes à mes yeux et que ça vaut la peine qu’elles soient partagées...

      Voici son message :

      J’avais aussi dans ma liste « conséquences dramatiques du confinement » : la hausse des IVG, IST, dépressions, pétages de plombs des plus isolé.es, des santés mentales fragiles, etc... mouarf.

      En fait, en gros, pour moi, la question principale est : si on pense que le confinement est la seule manière de combattre la pandémie, alors il faut le faire de façon responsable, c’est à dire en mettant en place des mesures CONCRETES pour éviter la création de conséquences graves en parallèle... parce que sinon, pour moi ça donne une situation paradoxale : on sauve effectivement des vies d’un côté, et d’un autre, on envoie d’autres à des situations de souffrance extrêmes et aussi à la mort... comment on tient les comptes alors ? Combien seront « sauvé.es », pendant que d’autres mourront d’autre chose que du coronavirus ?

      Annoncer un confinement :
      – sans garantir de revenu minimum pour un tas de professions / gens (notamment les gens comme moi qui ne sont pas salarié.e mais intermittent.es du spectacle, ou artisans, etc...)
      – sans garantir une protection des personnes (enfants y compris !) victimes de violences
      – sans garantir une prévention / un suivi des réductions des risques...
      – sans regarder en face qu’on va « sauver » des milliers de vies d’un côté oui, mais envoyer des milliers de gens vers des souffrances extrêmes , à aussi à la mort d’un autre côté ...

      ça me semble étrange et irresponsable.

      J’en parle très peu autour de moi, parce que c’est un sujet brûlant, je sens qu’il y a comme une sorte de consensus hyper général (comme après les attentats de Charlie)... et ça semble difficile d’émettre une opinion un peu critique...

      En vrai, j’applique les « gestes barrières » et les consignes de sécurité, parce que je suis pas débile, XXX et moi on fait au mieux pour nous et pour les autres, et on a je crois un sens aïgue de la solidarité...

      et c’est justement parce que je me sens solidaire que j’ai aussi conscience que c’est pas une bonne idée pour des tonnes de gens, pour une tonne de situations sociales, ce confinement.
      Donc, prenons en compte tous les aspects de cette situation de pandémie : les données sanitaires ne sont pas les seules à prendre en compte il me semble. Il faut les croiser avec les données sociologiques, sociales, psychologiques. Nan ?

      Et puis, aussi, je trouve ça un peu « gros » quand Macron, dans son allocution guerrière d’hier soir, culpabilise les « inconscient.es » qui se baladent dans les parcs un dimanche après-midi dans un contexte de pandémie, alors qu’ils maintiennent les élections municipales, ou que bon nombre d’entreprises/banques/institutions ne sont pas obligées de fermer. Pourquoi ma voisine continue à aller bosser dans son usine de production d’objets inutiles, voir nuisibles à la planète et à la société alors que je ne peux pas aller faire courir mes gosses dans le parc en bas de chez moi ???
      Il faudrait peut être tenir une ligne claire et cohérente non ?

    • For some people, social distancing means being trapped indoors with an abuser

      As more cities go under lockdown, activists are worried that attempts to curb coronavirus will inadvertently lead to an increase in domestic violence.

      Coronavirus is fuelling domestic violence

      Home is supposed to be the safest place any of us could be right now. However, for people experiencing domestic violence, social distancing means being trapped inside with an abuser. As more cities go under lockdown, activists are worried that attempts to curb the coronavirus will inadvertently lead to an increase in domestic violence.

      Domestic violence is already a deadly epidemic. One in three women around the world experience physical or sexual violence, mostly from an intimate partner, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). As the WHO notes: “This makes it the most widespread, but among the least reported human rights abuses.” Gender-based violence tends to increase during humanitarian emergencies and conflicts; “women’s bodies too often become battlefields”.
      Coronavirus: the week explained - sign up for our email newsletter
      Read more

      Reports from China suggest the coronavirus has already caused a significant spike in domestic violence. Local police stations saw a threefold increase in cases reported in February compared with the previous year, according to Wan Fei, the founder of an anti-domestic violence not-forprofit. “According to our statistics, 90% of the causes of violence are related to the Covid-19 epidemic,” Wan told Sixth Tone, an English-language magazine based in China.

      A similar story is playing out in America. A domestic violence hotline in Portland, Oregon, says calls doubled last week. And the national domestic violence hotline is hearing from a growing number of callers whose abusers are using Covid-19 to further control and isolate them. “Perpetrators are threatening to throw their victims out on the street so they get sick,” the hotline’s CEO told Time. “We’ve heard of some withholding financial resources or medical assistance.”

      With all attention focused on curbing a public health crisis, the problem of private violence risks being overlooked or deprioritized by authorities. In the UK, for example, schools are now closed to everyone except for the children of key workers performing essential services. Domestic violence professionals have been left off this list; apparently preventing abuse at home isn’t an essential service. Dawn Butler, Labour’s women and equalities spokeswoman, has asked the prime minister to “urgently reconsider” this classification and consider implementing emergency funding to help people in danger escape domestic abuse during the crisis. “[T]wo women are killed every week by a partner or former partner,” Butler tweeted. “If the Govt fails to prepare and plan more people will die.”

      Now more than ever we need to look out for the most vulnerable in our society; activists are calling on neighbors to be extra aware and vigilant of possible cases of domestic violence. Retreating into our homes doesn’t mean cutting ourselves off from our communities. We’re all in this together.
      Harvey Weinstein begins his 23-year sentence

      The convicted rapist was transferred to a maximum-security prison in New York on Wednesday. New York’s governor, Andrew Cuomo, recently announced that New York will produce its own hand sanitizer, manufactured by prison inmates making as little as $0.16 an hour – so it’s possible that Weinstein might end up making state sanitizer.
      Remembering the Latina who invented hand sanitizer

      Did you know hand sanitizer was invented by a woman? In 1966 a student nurse named Lupe Hernandez realized that alcohol in gel form could be used to wash hands when there was no access to soap and water. Hernandez, who was based in California, quickly called an inventions hotline to patent the idea.
      Four men executed over Delhi rape and murder

      In 2012 a 23-year-old medical student was brutally gang-raped and murdered in a Delhi bus; a crime which shook the world and sparked unprecedented protests in India. On Friday four of the men convicted of the crime were hanged, the first time in five years capital punishment has been used in the country. One family may have got closure but the situation for Indian women remains bleak. “[I]n India, where a rape of a woman is reported every 16 minutes, this is no time for celebration,” argues a CNN op-ed. Since the attack India has introduced tougher sexual assault laws but rapes have continued to go up; in 2018, the last year for which there are statistics, they were significantly higher than in 2012.
      New Zealand passes law to decriminalize abortion

      “For over 40 years, abortion has been the only medical procedure considered a crime in New Zealand,” the country’s justice minister said in a statement. “But from now abortions will be rightly treated as a health issue.”
      Catherine Hamlin, trailblazing doctor, dies at 96

      The Australian gynecologist devoted much of her life to treating Ethiopian women with obstetric fistula – an injury sustained in childbirth that leaves women incontinent and often ostracized by their community.
      Marvel unveils its first black non-binary superhero: Snowflake

      Snowflake has a twin brother called Safespace. The reaction to these names has been less that ecstatic.
      The average woman gets mansplained to 312 times a year

      That’s according to a study of 2,000 employed women commissioned by a financial app called Self. I’m sure a helpful man somewhere will be happy to tell you exactly what is wrong with this study.
      The week in penguinarchy

      The best thing by far on the internet this week was a video of a penguin called Wellington marching around Chicago’s deserted aquarium and marveling at the fish. Coronavirus has caused most of us to go under lockdown, but at least Wellington got a nice day out.

      https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/21/coronavirus-domestic-violence-week-in-patriarchy?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

    • Le confinement cause une hausse des violences familiales, déplore la FCPE

      Marlène Schiappa avait alerté sur ce risque en période de confinement lié au coronavirus. La FCPE confirme ses craintes.

      C’était une des conséquences malheureusement prévues par le gouvernement en temps de confinement face au coronavirus. Le secrétaire d’État à l’égalité entre les hommes et les femmes Marlène Schiappa avait alerté dès le 16 mars et l’instauration de ces mesures exceptionnelles sur le fait qu’elles pouvaient “hélas générer un terreau propice aux violences conjugales”.

      La FCPE confirme ses craintes, ce dimanche 22 mars. Invité d’Europe1, Rodrigo Arenas, co-président de la principale fédération de parents d’élèves, a expliqué avoir une recrudescence d’appels liés à des situations de “violences familiales.”

      “Il y a deux choses qui rendent dingues les gens : la chaleur et la promiscuité. On n’a pas la chaleur, mais on a la promiscuité. On a énormément de remontées de violences conjugales et les enfants qui sont au bout de la chaîne s’en prennent plein la figure”, a-t-il indiqué à la radio comme vous pouvez l’entendre ci-dessous.

      Problème supplémentaire, contrairement à ce que promettait Marlène Schiappa au début du confinement, le numéro d’information dédié aux violences conjugales 3919 ne répond plus. Ou du moins plus beaucoup.

      Comme L’Obs, ou BFMTV vendredi, Le HuffPost a tenté de contacter le service ce samedi 22 mars sans succès. Un message pré-enregistré nous invite à renouveler notre appel plus tard.

      Joint par RTL samedi, le cabinet de Marlène Schiappa précise que le numéro “fonctionne toujours” mais que la migration -provoquée par le télétravail- de la plateforme prend du temps et entraîne des bugs. “Au plus tard lundi tout sera fonctionnel”, promet l’entourage de la ministre.

      https://www.huffingtonpost.fr/entry/confinement-la-fcpe-deplore-une-hausse-des-violences-familiales_fr_5e

    • Coronavirus Covid-19 : violences conjugales et femmes en danger, comment les aider en période de confinement ?

      Marlène Schiappa et son homologue italienne Elena Bonetti ont annoncé « agir ensemble » pour protéger les femmes contre les violences sexistes et sexuelles en cette période de confinement. Mais en application, comment ça se passe ?

      https://france3-regions.francetvinfo.fr/bourgogne-franche-comte/cote-d-or/dijon/coronavirus-covid-19-violences-conjugales-femmes-danger

    • Le confinement va augmenter les #violences_intra-familiales et en particulier les #violences_conjugales, c’est déjà ce qu’a révélé l’expérience du #Wuhan (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-51705199). Là encore, ces violences seront encore moins prises en charge qu’avant puisque le 3919 ne fonctionne plus pendant cette crise contrairement à ce qu’avait annoncé Marlène Schiappa (https://www.nouvelobs.com/droits-des-femmes/20200319.OBS26314/le-39-19-ne-repond-plus.html). Au sixième jour du confinement, cette tendance est d’ailleurs aussi relatée par la FCPE ce dimanche (https://www.europe1.fr/societe/face-au-confinement-on-a-enormement-de-remontees-de-violences-conjugales-rap).

      https://npa2009.org/idees/societe/le-confinement-la-destruction-du-lien-social-et-ses-consequences

    • Concernant les violences conjugales et familiales, les procès en cours d’assises, que ce soient viols ou « féminicides », sont reportés. Ce qui constitue une non-réponse à la situation de fait. Mais certains tribunaux maintiennent des permanences au civil où des Juges aux Affaires familiales (JAF) peuvent décider d’éloigner par exemple un mari violent. Il appartient aux magistrats d’apprécier l’urgence des situations.

      https://www.franceculture.fr/droit-justice/denis-salas-la-justice-se-trouve-confrontee-a-un-phenomene-totalement-

    • For Abused Women, a Pandemic Lockdown Holds Dangers of Its Own

      As millions across the U.S. stay home to help flatten the curve, domestic violence organizations and support systems are scrambling to adapt to the rapidly shifting landscape.

      Early last week, as the novel coronavirus exploded from state to state, a woman called the National Domestic Violence Hotline in a crisis: Her partner had tried to strangle her and she needed medical help, but feared going to the hospital because of the virus.

      Another woman was being forced to choose between work and home. “He threatened to throw me out if I didn’t work from home,” she said. “He said if I started coughing, he was throwing me out in the street and that I could die alone in a hospital room.”

      In another call, a girl — aged between 13 and 15 (specific identifiers have been removed to protect the callers) — said that her mother’s partner had just abused her mother, then gone on to abuse the girl herself. But with schools shut, turning to a teacher or a counselor for help was not an option.

      These instances, gleaned from the hotline’s first responders, highlight two important facets of things to come during the coronavirus crisis. First, as lawmakers across the country order lockdowns to slow the spread of the virus, the lives of people stuck in physically or emotionally abusive relationships have — and will — become harder, which has already been seen in the pandemic hotspots of China and Italy.

      Second, the virus raises the stakes for domestic violence services across the country as they scramble to adapt to a patchwork of new government policies and restrictions that shift day by day and vary from state to state.

      “We know that any time an abusive partner may be feeling a loss of power and control — and everybody’s feeling a loss of power and control right now — it could greatly impact how victims and survivors are being treated in their homes,” said Katie Ray-Jones, chief executive of the hotline.

      She expects to see the intensity and frequency of abuse escalate, even if the number of individual cases doesn’t — a pattern that experts witnessed during the economic downturn of 2008 and immediately after 9/11, Hurricane Sandy and Hurricane Katrina.

      In the U.S., more than one in three women has experienced rape, physical violence, and/or stalking by an intimate partner (defined as current or former spouses or partners) in their lifetime, according to a 2010 survey by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. And in recent years, the number of domestic violence cases (which includes assault by intimate partners and family members) has spiked, making up more than half of all violent crimes in the U.S. in 2018, according to the Justice Bureau.

      Spending days, weeks or even months in the presence of an abusive partner takes an immense emotional toll too, said Teresa Burns, who manages the Casa de Esperanza shelter in St. Paul, Minn. And that’s exactly the conditions that the coronavirus lockdown has set up.

      Many of Burns’s clients are undocumented individuals whose immigration status can become a means of control by abusive partners. It’s not uncommon for abusers to claim that survivors will be deported if they seek help.

      She fears these types of threats will escalate during the coronavirus crisis, and with information about the government’s response changing nearly by the hour, survivors may not know who or what to believe.

      Those who may have felt safe once their partner left for work or their children were at school now live without any window of relief as businesses and schools shutter. “When the mind is constantly in fight, flight, freeze [mode] because of perpetual fear, that can have a lasting impact on a person’s mental health,” Burns said.

      Shelters across the country are adapting as best they can while trying to keep pace with constantly changing virus regulations, including implementing social distancing practices on site, taking temperatures of newcomers and regularly cleaning and disinfecting common spaces.

      In New York, now considered the epicenter of the virus in the U.S., shelters are categorized as essential services and are encouraged to keep functioning as normally as possible, even though many are at or almost at capacity, said Kelli Owens, executive director of the state’s Prevention of Domestic Violence office.

      But several organizations have started to cut back on certain services and may have to turn away newcomers soon to avoid overcrowding at shelters. Drop-in counseling centers are shut down and in-person support groups are suspended.

      One survivor, Maggie, 25, who spoke to The Times via Twitter, and is working to heal from an abusive relationship she left five years ago, said that in recent weeks, her weekly therapy appointment moved online and her support group was canceled altogether, which has made it even more difficult for her to cope with her increased isolation. As a result, she’s fallen back into unhealthy coping mechanisms, like drinking and smoking, she said.

      “I imagine many survivors, even if they are safe in their home, are experiencing long hours of sitting alone with traumatic thoughts and nightmares due to increased anxiety,” Maggie said.

      Advocates, who are often the first responders in cases of domestic violence, are fielding questions remotely, preparing those who can’t flee for worst case situations, known as safety planning.

      “We’re having really difficult conversations, running through horrific scenarios,” Ray-Jones said.

      “What that could mean is, OK, if an argument breaks out, where is the safest place in your house? Keep arguments out of the kitchen, out of the bathroom, which can be really dangerous spaces. If you need to go sleep in your car, is that a possibility?”

      Organizations most often take these kinds of questions over the phone, but being in such proximity with an abuser can turn the simple act of a phone call into such a dangerous gamble that many are preparing for fewer calls on their hotline and more questions via their text and online chat services that are available around the clock.

      Meanwhile, with courts closing across the country and advocates, who would typically help survivors navigate the judicial system, working remotely, yet another avenue of support for people experiencing abuse is further complicated, said Susan Pearlstein, the co-supervisor of the Family Law Unit of Philadelphia Legal Assistance.

      Still, the public should know that obtaining a legal protection order is considered an essential service by most jurisdictions and “many courts are trying to have access open for domestic violence survivors and to allow order petitions of abuse or restraining orders to be filed,” either over the phone or electronically, Pearlstein said.

      “This is a really heartbreaking time,” said Ray-Jones, speaking to the overall heightened anxiety during this uncertain period.

      Resources for victims and survivors:

      Anti-Violence Project offers a 24-hour English/Spanish hotline for L.G.B.T.Q.+ experiencing abuse or hate-based violence: call 212-714-1141

      The National Domestic Violence Hotline is available around the clock and in more than 200 languages: call 1-800-799-SAFE or chat with their advocates here or text LOVEIS to 22522.

      New York State Domestic and Sexual Violence Hotline is available in multiple languages: call 1-800-942-6906 for English. For deaf or hard of hearing: 711

      For immediate dangers, call 911.

      https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/24/us/coronavirus-lockdown-domestic-violence.html

    • Warning over rise in UK domestic abuse cases linked to coronavirus

      Manchester deputy mayor says police beginning to classify incidents connected to virus.

      There has been a rise in domestic abuse incidents directly related to the coronavirus outbreak, according to a police leader.

      Beverley Hughes, Greater Manchester’s deputy mayor for policing and crime, said there had been reports of abuse linked to the lockdown, and said authorities were preparing for serious incidents.

      After a meeting of the region’s Covid-19 emergency committee, Lady Hughes said: “I think we are beginning to see a rise in domestic abuse incidents. We anticipated this might happen in the very stressful circumstances for many families.”
      Coronavirus: the week explained - sign up for our email newsletter
      Read more

      Charities and police forces across the country have been warning of a potential rise in cases of domestic violence. In China there was a threefold increase in cases reported to police stations in February compared with the previous year.

      The justice secretary, Robert Buckland, told the Commons justice committee this week that there may be more cases of domestic abuse, online crime and fraud during the lockdown.

      Hughes later said the overall level of domestic abuse cases was as expected, but officers had begun to classify incidents believed to have a connection to the virus.

      She said families were being asked to stay at home and many had significantly less money as a result of the restrictions.

      Hughes said: “The potential for tension to arise in the home as a result of what we are asking people to cope with, in order to suppress the virus, is going to increase and therefore we would be right to think this might display itself in an increase in the number of domestic incidents we are called to.

      “We are preparing for that. Some of those most serious incidents will be challenging to deal with, particularly if the victim needs to be moved to a refuge, but the police specialise in these kind of cases and the local partners, local authorities, they’re working together really closely to prepare for that.”

      Avon and Somerset police reported a 20.9% increase in domestic abuse incidents in the last two weeks, from 718 to 868. Police in Cumbria have asked postal workers and delivery drivers to look out for signs of abuse.

      DCI Dan St Quintin, of Cumbria police, said: “In the coming weeks and months we ask for everyone to look out for each other as much as possible. We would also like to extend this plea to those such as postal workers, delivery drivers, food delivery companies and carers who will still be visiting houses, to keep an eye out for any signs of abuse and to report any concerns to us.”

      Quintin said the Bright Sky app, which can be disguised for people worried about partners checking their phones, provided support and information for victims.

      The National Centre for Domestic Violence said it fully supported the plea and warned of “huge dangers lurking for victims”..

      Its chief executive, Mark Groves, said: “While the whole country grapples with the consequences of Covid-19, there are huge dangers lurking for victims of domestic abuse and violence. We fully support Cumbria police’s plea to key workers to help the police investigate suspicions or concerns surrounding victims or perpetrators.”

      The Thames Valley chief constable, John Campbell, said his force expected to see a rise in the number of domestic abuse calls He said domestic violence and fraud would become a priority for his force as “criminals decide to change their behaviours’ to take advantage of coronavirus”.

      “We are seeing and monitoring very closely the issues around domestic abuse, we anticipate that it might increase and we will deal with that robustly in a way that you would expect us to,” Campbell said.

      Shanika Varga, a solicitor at Stowe Family Law, who specialises in domestic abuse cases, said: “Being stuck in a house together for two weeks or longer means the risk of a situation becoming violent is much higher. Lots of people – whether they realise it or not – are in abusive relationships, and abusers will typically manipulate any situation to take advantage of their perceived position of power.”

      Varga urged victims to start thinking of a contingency plan for escaping their abusers. “Knowing your options and making sure people are informed and fully prepared to take action if need be is vital. Don’t forget that help is out there,” she said.

      https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/mar/26/warning-over-rise-in-uk-domestic-abuse-cases-linked-to-coronavirus?CMP=

    • Coronavirus en #Nouvelle-Aquitaine : Les violences intrafamiliales en forte hausse avec le confinement

      Si la délinquance est en baisse, dans la région, les forces de l’ordre multiplient les interventions dans les foyers depuis une semaine.

      Avec le confinement, les violences intrafamiliales explosent selon les policiers et gendarmes en Nouvelle-Aquitaine. Le phénomène est national.
      Les disputes sur fond d’alcool se multiplient alors que les victimes se retrouvent prises au piège dans les foyers.
      L’Etat maintient ses services face à cette recrudescence. Les forces de l’ordre elles n’hésitent pas à reprendre contact avec les victimes après leurs interventions.

      C’était un scénario prévisible et malheureusement, il se vérifie un peu plus chaque jour. Les violences conjugales et intrafamiliales augmentent voire explosent depuis le début du confinement en France. Les policiers et gendarmes de la Gironde sont à l’unisson sur le sujet : « Si la délinquance (vol, cambriolage, trafic…) est en forte baisse, expliquent leurs responsables départementaux, les interventions pour des violences familiales se multiplient même si elles ne déclenchent pas forcément à chaque fois des procédures. » Ce mercredi soir, leurs collègues du Périgord ont par exemple interpellé un trentenaire qui menaçait sa famille avec un fusil et tentait de mettre le feu à la maison.

      Dès le 18 mars, les recours à police secours dans le département étaient déjà en forte hausse avec 1.200 appels ce jour-là contre 600 habituellement. Une semaine plus tard, le nombre de demandes sur la plateforme arretonslesviolences.gouv.fr aurait augmenté de 40 % selon les policiers girondins. En effet comme le soulignait le gouvernement en début de semaine, « le contexte particulier du confinement constitue malheureusement un terreau favorable aux violences » en raison de « la promiscuité, des tensions et de l’anxiété » qu’il entraîne.

      Encore plus difficile de se signaler pour les victimes

      Les gendarmes soulignent des interventions toujours plus nombreuses pour « des disputes familiales sur fond d’alcool et souvent la nuit. » A ce sujet, la réponse de Fabienne Buccio, la préfète de Gironde et de Nouvelle-Aquitaine, est claire : il n’y aura pas d’interdiction de ventes d’alcool « à ce stade » comme a pu tenter de le faire son homologue dans l’Aisne. La représentante de l’Etat préfère soulever un problème beaucoup plus important :

      « Je ne veux pas stigmatiser qui que ce soit mais en ce moment les hommes sont bien plus présents au domicile familial que d’habitude avec le confinement et c’est donc encore plus difficile pour les victimes de se signaler auprès des autorités. »

      Une situation face à laquelle, la plupart des associations se disent « désemparées » à l’image de l’Union nationale des familles de féminicides. « Être confiné, c’est déjà compliqué pour des gens qui s’entendent bien. Alors, pour les victimes de violences conjugales, elles vont vivre un véritable calvaire », rappelait il y a quelques jours sa présidente Sandrine Bouchait. Sans oublier, les enfants, eux aussi en première ligne face à la violence.

      Les forces de l’ordre n’hésitent pas à rappeler après leurs interventions

      Alors comment faire pour limiter au maximum les violences intrafamiliales ? Il y a les moyens connus avec les services de police ou de gendarmerie (17 ou 112), les pompiers (18 ou 112) ou le Samu (15) qui restent mobilisés pour les situations d’urgence. Marlène Schiappa, secrétaire d’État chargée de l’Égalité entre les femmes et les hommes et de la lutte contre les discriminations, a annoncé que les numéros d’écoute, les plateformes gouvernementales, l’accompagnement dans des hébergements d’urgence et les procès au pénal contre les agresseurs seraient maintenus. Le 3919 est notamment de nouveau opérationnel depuis lundi.

      Les forces de l’ordre sont également mobilisées sur le terrain : « Après certaines interventions, nous n’hésitons pas à rappeler les personnes et à reprendre contact avec elles. Nous sommes vraiment très attentifs à ce phénomène », explique la gendarmerie de la Gironde.

      De son côté, le secrétaire d’Etat auprès du ministre des Solidarités et de la santé en charge de l’enfance Adrien Taquet « appelle à nouveau chacun à redoubler de vigilance pendant cette période, et à composer le 119 si l’on est témoin, même auditif, même dans le doute, de violence commise sur un enfant, quelle que soit sa nature. » Le gouvernement va également réactiver une campagne de sensibilisation à la question des violences faites aux enfants cette semaine.

      https://www.20minutes.fr/societe/2748663-20200326-video-coronavirus-nouvelle-aquitaine-violences-intrafamil

    • Coronavirus et confinement : femmes et #enfants en danger

      Plus d’une centaine de sénatrices et de sénateurs demande au gouvernement de protéger les familles victimes de violence que le confinement expose à des dangers encore plus graves.

      Sans nier la gravité de la crise sanitaire et la nécessité absolue du confinement, nous ne devons pas occulter les risques auxquels sont exposés les femmes et les enfants dans les foyers violents. Le confinement peut être un piège terrible quand il enferme une famille dans la terreur permanente des insultes, des cris et des coups. En cette période où nous déployons une immense énergie pour essayer de dominer nos frustrations et notre angoisse, il faut imaginer ce que peut être le quotidien des victimes de violences, a fortiori quand le drame se joue dans un logement exigu : l’#enfer.

      En annonçant la mise en place d’un plan de continuité pour protéger les victimes de violences conjugales, la secrétaire d’Etat chargée de l’Egalité entre les femmes et les hommes et de la lutte contre la discrimination Marlène Schiappa a anticipé ce danger. Le maintien du numéro d’appel 3919 est une excellente initiative et il faut remercier les écoutants qui continuent d’exercer cette mission dans des conditions beaucoup plus complexes.

      Face à l’isolement de la victime

      De nombreuses questions persistent cependant : comment fuir un conjoint violent – surtout avec des enfants – quand les parents et amis susceptibles d’offrir un refuge sont loin, quand les transports sont aléatoires et quand les hébergements d’urgence, structurellement débordés, peuvent difficilement garantir des conditions de sécurité correctes face au virus ? Quelles mesures prendre pour protéger les victimes établies habituellement hors de France ? Comment les victimes confinées chez elles peuvent-elles joindre le 3919 ou la plateforme en ligne dédiée aux victimes de violences, alors que l’on sait que le premier signe de violences conjugales est l’isolement de la victime, privée de tout moyen de communication autonome par son compagnon violent qui lui a souvent confisqué son téléphone et s’acharne à traquer ses mails ?
      Si l’accompagnement des victimes peut toujours être assuré par les services de police et si le dépôt de plainte demeure possible, comment envisager qu’une victime puisse, sans courir un danger accru, porter plainte contre un conjoint violent avec lequel elle est condamnée à cohabiter à cause du confinement ? Est-il encore possible, compte tenu de l’état de nos hôpitaux, d’y faire établir des constats médicaux de coups et violences sexuelles ?

      Enfin, ne peut-on craindre que, malgré le renforcement récent, dans le sillage du Grenelle de lutte contre les violences conjugales, des efforts de formation et de sensibilisation des personnels de police et de gendarmerie, ceux-ci aient le réflexe de minimiser ces violences et de les considérer comme un effet compréhensible, voire excusable, du stress lié au confinement ? Chaque jour, le décompte glaçant des victimes du coronavirus a remplacé celui des féminicides qui avait marqué l’année 2019. L’épidémie a fait disparaître les violences conjugales et intrafamiliales de l’actualité mais pas de la réalité.
      Tous concernés

      Nous, sénatrices et sénateurs, demandons solennellement au gouvernement de continuer à assurer la protection, en cette période de crise sanitaire majeure, des femmes et des enfants victimes de violences, que l’exigence de confinement expose à des dangers encore plus graves. Malgré l’épreuve exceptionnelle que traverse notre pays, les femmes et les enfants qui subissent des violences ne doivent en aucun cas être sacrifiés.

      Le gouvernement peut compter sur les collectivités territoriales – les départements comme les communes – déjà très impliquées en temps normal dans les missions d’aide aux personnes vulnérables, de protection de l’enfance et de lutte contre les violences, pour apporter les solutions adaptées à chaque territoire pendant cette période exceptionnelle. La question des moyens alloués à ces missions et à leurs acteurs reste d’actualité.

      Engageons-nous, ensemble, pour que le nombre de ces victimes n’alourdisse pas le bilan, d’ores et déjà effroyable, de la crise sanitaire. Violences intrafamiliales : citoyens, voisins, amis, parents, collègues, tous concernés, tous acteurs, tous mobilisés, tous vigilants. C’est notre responsabilité collective.

      https://www.liberation.fr/debats/2020/03/28/coronavirus-et-confinement-femmes-et-enfants-en-danger_1783279

    • Violences conjugales : Schiappa annonce des « points contacts éphémères » dans les centres commerciaux

      https://www.lefigaro.fr/flash-actu/violences-conjugales-schiappa-annonce-des-points-contacts-ephemeres-dans-le

      La secrétaire d’État à l’Égalité femmes-hommes, Marlène Schiappa, a annoncé samedi l’installation de « points d’accompagnement éphémères » dans des centres commerciaux pour accueillir des femmes victimes de violences en temps de confinement où les déplacements sont limités. « Comme il est plus difficile de se déplacer, nous faisons en sorte que les dispositifs d’accompagnement aillent aux femmes », explique Mme Schiappa dans un entretien au Parisien.

      Créés « en partenariat avec des associations locales, les services de l’État et Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield, gestionnaire de centres commerciaux », ces « points d’accompagnement éphémères » seront installés dans des locaux « permettant la confidentialité mais assez vastes pour accueillir les femmes en respectant les mesures barrières », détaille-t-elle.

      La secrétaire d’État cite « dans un premier temps » pour la région parisienne So Ouest à Levallois-Perret, les 4 Temps à la Défense, Carré Sénart à Lieusaint, le Forum des Halles à Paris, ou les Ulis, et, dans le Nord, V2 à Valenciennes. « Dans un deuxième temps, Dijon, Rennes, Lyon... là où il y a un hypermarché ouvert », ajoute-t-elle, affirmant viser « une vingtaine de points dans les prochaines semaines ». « En allant faire les courses, ces femmes trouveront une oreille attentive et un accès à leurs droits d’une manière innovante et efficace », estime-t-elle.
      Fonds spécial et dépôt de plainte

      Parallèlement, Mme Schiappa annonce un « fonds spécial financé par l’État d’un million d’euros pour aider les associations de terrain à s’adapter à la période ». Elle promet également de financer « jusqu’à 20.000 nuitées d’hôtel pour que les femmes puissent fuir l’homme violent ».

      Interrogée sur l’absence de « motif ’’dépôt de plainte’’ », dans l’attestation de sortie obligatoire en période de confinement, la secrétaire d’État a répondu que « les juridictions pour les violences conjugales » avaient été laissées ouvertes.
      À lire aussi : "Une petite augmentation mais rien de significatif" : les violences conjugales à l’heure du confinement

      Elle a avancé le chiffre de « deux » meurtres de femmes par leur conjoint ou ex-conjoint depuis le début du confinement, le 17 mars. « Le confinement est une épreuve collective qui vient percuter l’histoire familiale et personnelle de chaque personne, la situation peut dégénérer à tout moment quand on vit avec une personne violente », rappelle-t-elle, inquiète que « les femmes se disent qu’elles doivent subir pendant le confinement ». « Non ! Les dispositifs de l’Etat ne sont pas mis sur pause, ils sont même renforcés », assure-t-elle.

      À VOIR AUSSI - Violences conjugales et confinement : un dispositif d’alerte mis en place dans les pharmacies

      Espérons que les flics n’en profite pas pour verbaliser les femmes dans ces point éphémères.

    • Coronavirus. Les associations craignent une augmentation des violences conjugales
      À Nantes, avec les mesures de confinement, l’association Solidarités Femmes double ses écoutantes au téléphone. Elle craint une augmentation des violences conjugales.
      Depuis mardi 18 mars, l’association Solidarité Femmes a renforcé sa ligne d’écoute téléphonique, destinée aux femmes victimes de violences conjugales. La ligne est ouverte du lundi au vendredi, de 10 h à 17 h, au 02 40 12 12 40.

      https://www.ouest-france.fr/pays-de-la-loire/loire-atlantique/coronavirus-les-associations-craignent-une-augmentation-des-violences-c

    • « En Belgique, plusieurs associations féministes ont également lancé un message d’alerte à ce sujet, comme l’association Femmes de Droit. L’asbl Vie Féminine a adapté ses activités : elle a renforcé ses permanences juridiques et sociales et a reçu l’autorisation de la Région Wallonne de les effectuer par téléphone, ce qui n’est pas le cas en temps normal où il leur est demandé de les organiser physiquement. »
      https://www.rtbf.be/info/dossier/les-grenades/detail_coronavirus-le-risque-de-violences-conjugales-augmente-a-cause-du-confin

    • Les violences conjugales à l’épreuve du confinement

      Depuis le début de la période de confinement, les collectifs féministes alertent sur les risques d’augmentation des violences conjugales. Les pouvoirs publics doivent prendre au sérieux une situation compliquée, comme celle où l’on se retrouve enfermée pour plusieurs semaines avec un conjoint violent.

      Le foyer, dans lequel il s’agit de se réfugier pour se protéger de la pandémie, n’est pas synonyme de réconfort et de sécurité pour de nombreuses femmes en France. La violence conjugale, souvent physique, mais également verbale, émotionnelle ou économique, pourrait se manifester plus fortement pendant la période de confinement. En Chine, les violences physiques au sein des couples ont augmenté pendant l’épidémie du coronavirus. La France n’est pas à l’abri de voir ses statistiques s’élever.
      Des femmes abandonnées

      Alors que le système d’aide aux victimes de violences conjugales ne fonctionne pas toujours correctement en période normale, le confinement et les bouleversements qui l’accompagnent n’arrangent pas les choses. Le numéro d’écoute national 3919 destiné aux femmes victimes de violences et à leur entourage ne fonctionne plus depuis l’annonce du confinement. Il rouvre avec des horaires réduits à partir de ce lundi 23 mars 2020. Pour Léonor Guénoun, du collectif féministe Nous toutes : « C’est très grave, et c’est vraiment un comble que ce numéro soit réduit, surtout en période de confinement, alors qu’il devrait être ouvert 24 heures sur 24. »

      Les centres d’hébergement ont du mal à accueillir de nouvelles personnes. Nous Toutes « demande des places dans des hôtels qui sont fermés ou peu occupés comme en Espagne » pour pallier ces foyers surchargés. L’absence de moyens spécifiques alloués empêche la prise en charge rapide et efficace des femmes victimes de violences conjugales. Pour Mohamed Jemal, président de l’association Un Toît pour elles, une association qui aide les femmes en grande précarité à se trouver un logement, « des promesses faites par le gouvernement n’ont pas été tenues pour la mise à disposition de chambres d’hôtel et la mise à l’abri des SDF ».

      Il regrette également qu’il n’y ait pas eu de « consignes claires pour mettre à l’abri des femmes en danger ». De plus, l’hébergement solidaire chez des particuliers ne fonctionne plus en raison du confinement. Les centres sociaux font face à des problèmes sanitaires supplémentaires à celui de l’épidémie. Les masques, les gants et le gel hydroalcoolique qui doivent parvenir aux associations sont répartis selon des schémas complexes, peu accessibles à des petites structures, comme celle gérée par Mohamed Jemal.
      Un climat propice à la violence

      Selon Léonor Guénoun, « trois risques principaux d’augmentation des violences » existent : dans des couples sans violence où un conjoint commence à être violent, dans un passage à un cran supérieur -de la violence verbale à la violence physique par exemple- et enfin « la tragédie d’un féminicide ».

      L’avocate Isabelle Steyer, référence dans la défense des victimes de violences conjugales, explique que le climat de surveillance constante se renforce étant donné que l’on peut vérifier les appels, les sorties, les occupations de chacun·e. Le confinement, selon elle, se vit comme une situation particulière car « on a jamais eu l’habitude de vivre tout le temps ensemble ». Être constamment ensemble peut déclencher des actes insoupçonnés parce que « la violence arrive à un moment où on ne s’y attend pas ».

      D’après l’avocate, le risque de ne plus avoir de vie intime et de tout partager pour la femme est de ne plus pouvoir « appeler qui l’on veut et penser à élaborer le départ ». Léonor Guénoun explique que la « fuite du domicile » doit pouvoir rester une option possible pour les femmes victimes.
      Des actions rapides et de l’aide collective

      Pour remédier à cette situation et prévenir tout acte violent, Nous toutes met en place des campagnes de sensibilisation et diffuse des visuels « pour que les femmes sachent qu’elles peuvent fuir et être aidées« . Le collectif féministe rappelle aussi les numéros à contacter, en cas d’urgence la police par le 17 ou le 114 pour les SMS, ou le 08.00.05.95.95. qui peut aider les femmes victimes. L’avocate Isabelle Steyer encourage également les femmes à prévenir et à « utiliser des espaces que l’on avait pas l’habitude d’utiliser pour téléphoner ».

      Pour les personnes qui ne seraient pas confrontées à de la violence conjugale, il faut rappeler à son entourage que le confinement n’autorise pas à être violent. Il convient également prendre régulièrement des nouvelles des personnes pouvant subir des situations violentes. Enfin, selon l’avocate, « le côte très positif est que tout les voisins sont là », ce qui facilite l’appel au secours et la demande d’aide rapide car « les relations sont beaucoup plus proches avec ce confinement ».

      https://radioparleur.net/2020/03/24/violences-conjugales-epreuve-du-confinement

    • Sur la mesure donnant la possibilité de signaler des violences en pharmacie, j’ai eu une discussion avec une personne (une femme, je crois) qui trouvait la mesure cheap et ridicule mais les pharmacies ne sont pas que des commerces, ce sont aussi des lieux de soin, plus accessibles et qui offrent un meilleur accueil que les poulaillers, et l’Espagne fait ça depuis vingt ans avec un certain succès.

    • Domestic abuse cases soar as lockdown takes its toll

      Some charities can no longer ‘effectively support’ women because of lockdown and staff sickness.

      More than 25 organisations helping domestic violence victims have reported an increase in their caseload since the start of the UK’s coronavirus epidemic.

      One group, Chayn, said that analysis of online traffic showed that visitors to its website had more than trebled last month compared with the same period last year. An audit of 119 organisations by the domestic abuse charity SafeLives found, however, that even as pressure on frontline services increased, most were being forced to reduce vital services.

      The groups were surveyed during the last week of March, with 26 of them able to confirm increased caseloads owing to Covid-19. Three-quarters said they had had to reduce service delivery to victims.

      Most domestic abuse organisations provide face-to-face or phone support, but a quarter say they can not “effectively support” adult abuse victims owing to technical issues, inability to meet victims, and staff sickness.

      A separate study highlights the plight of domestic-violence survivors. SafeLives interviewed 66 survivors, and the women were asked to score themselves from zero to 10, with 10 denoting “safe”. More than half offered a score of five or less, with three saying they felt “not safe at all”.

      One said: “I’m in a controlling, emotionally abusive relationship and fear it could escalate due to heightened stress surrounding the current virus situation.” Another added that she was having to sit in her car to get away from the perpetrator.

      There is growing pressure on the government to announce emergency funding to help victims. Suzanne Jacob, chief executive of SafeLives, said: “We know the government is thinking about what extra support might be needed for victims and their families during this difficult time, and this research shows that helping services to stay afloat and carry on doing their vital lifesaving work will be key.”

      Hera Hussain, founder of Chayn, said: “Survivors of domestic abuse are walking on eggshells, scared of having no support if tensions escalate.”

      Evidence suggests that domestic abuse is likely to increase as a result of the pandemic. In China’s Hubei province, where the virus was first detected, domestic violence reports to police more than tripled during the lockdown in February.

      https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/04/domestic-abuse-cases-soar-as-lockdown-takes-its-toll?CMP=Share_iOSApp_O

    • In Italy, support groups fear lockdown is silencing domestic abuse victims

      MILAN: Italy has seen a sharp fall in official reports of domestic violence as it approaches a month under coronavirus lockdown, raising concern among some support groups that forced confinement is leaving victims struggling to seek help.

      Citing official data, a parliamentary committee into violence against women said last week that reports to police of domestic abuse dropped to 652 in the first 22 days of March, when Italy went into lockdown, from 1,157 in the same period of 2019.

      Telefono Rosa, Italy’s largest domestic violence helpline, said calls fell 55per cent to 496 in the first two weeks of March from 1,104 in the same period last year. Other help groups said they had seen similar declines.

      The parliamentary committee’s report said the trend did not mean a decline in violence against women but was rather a signal that “victims of violence risk being even more exposed to control and aggression by a partner who mistreats them.”

      “There are a lot of problems in this situation, maybe not the least of them is the difficulty of asking for help when everyone is obliged to stay at home,” said Alessandra Simone, director of the police criminal division in Milan.

      Successive Italian governments have passed reforms aimed at improving protections, but 13.6per cent of women have suffered violence from a partner or ex-partner, according to national statistics bureau Istat.

      The country has seen more than 100,000 cases of COVID-19 and accounts for almost a third of worldwide deaths. It was the first European nation to go into lockdown.

      “We’re seeing a drastic fall in calls by women because they have less freedom in this situation of forced confinement,” said Chiara Sainaghi, who manages five anti-violence centres in and around Milan for the Fondazione Somaschi, a social assistance foundation. She said calls to her group had fallen by as much as 70per cent.

      Some help groups and the authorities say they have tried to launch other forms of contact, including messaging services like WhatsApp, whose use has surged during lockdowns in many countries. Users in Italy are placing 20per cent more calls and sending 20per cent more messages on WhatsApp compared to a year ago, the company said in mid-March.

      Italian police have in recent days adapted an app originally designed to allow young people to report bullying and drug dealing near their schools to report domestic violence by sending messages or pictures without alerting their partner.

      In Spain, where police said they had also seen a fall in calls for help, authorities launched a WhatsApp service for women trapped at home which the Equality Ministry said had seen a 270per cent increase in consultations since the lockdown began.

      Valeria Valente, the senator who chairs the Italian parliamentary committee, said cultural and social factors in Italy already made it hard for many to report domestic violence.

      But she said the shutdown appeared to be leading some women who might otherwise try to leave their partners to stick it out.

      “How is a woman who wants to report violence supposed to move? With the lockdown (she) can only contact the anti-violence centres when she goes to the pharmacy or buys food,” Valente said.

      https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/world/in-italy--support-groups-fear-lockdown-is-silencing-domestic-abuse-

    • Domestic abuse killings ’more than double’ amid Covid-19 lockdown

      Pioneering project identifies at least 16 suspected incidences in UK over three-week period

      At least 16 suspected domestic abuse killings in the UK have been identified by campaigners since the Covid-19 lockdown restrictions were imposed, far higher than the average rate for the time of year, it has emerged.

      Karen Ingala Smith, the founder of Counting Dead Women, a pioneering project that records the killing of women by men in the UK, has identified at least 16 killings between 23 March and 12 April, including those of children.

      Looking at the same period over the last 10 years, Smith’s data records an average of five deaths.

      Her findings for 2020, which are collated from internet searches and people contacting over social media, were raised during evidence to the home affairs select ommittee on Wednesday.

      Dame Vera Baird QC, the victims’ commissioner for England and Wales, told MPs at the remote session: “Counting Dead Women has got to a total of 16 domestic abuse killings in the last three weeks. We usually say there are two a week, that looks to me like five a week, that’s the size of this crisis.”

      A number of domestic abuse charities and campaigners have reported a surge in calls to helplines and online services since the lockdown conditions were imposed, reflecting experiences in other countries.

      Smith, who is also chief executive of a domestic abuse charity, said: “I don’t believe coronavirus creates violent men. What we’re seeing is a window into the levels of abuse that women live with all the time. Coronavirus may exacerbate triggers, though I might prefer to call them excuses. Lockdown may restrict some women’s access to support or escape and it may even curtail measures some men take to keep their own violence under control.

      “We have to be cautious about how we talk about increases in men killing women. Over the last 10 years, in the UK, a woman has been killed by a man every three days, by a partner or ex-partner, every four days. So if this was averaged out, we might expect to see seven women killed in 21 days. In reality, there are always times when the numbers are higher or lower.

      “But we can say that the number of women killed by men over the first three weeks since lockdown is the highest it’s been for at least 11 years and is double that of an average 21 days over the last 10 years.”

      Smith’s research shows at least seven people have been allegedly killed by partners or former partners during the period, while three people have been allegedly killed by their father.

      The committee also heard evidence from Nicole Jacobs, the domestic abuse commissioner for England and Wales. She said time limits on investigating crimes would need to be relaxed to allow survivors of violence in the home to report perpetrators once the coronavirus restrictions were eased.

      “I have heard from police about the need to extend the time by which people can report crimes. There are people who are experiencing abuse right now who aren’t able to call the police because it wouldn’t be safe for them,” said Jacobs.

      “But they may well want to report a crime later so we need to allow for some extension to what the normal timescales would be for that kind of thing.”

      Crimes that are “summary only”, which means that they can only be tried at a magistrates court, including common assault and harassment, must be prosecuted within six months.

      Jacobs said services must prepare for the “inevitable surge” of domestic abuse victims seeking support when the lockdown lifts.

      She said there were concerns that some of the millions of pounds of government funding announced for the charity sector may struggle to reach small local charities that supported specific groups.

      “We need to allow those charities to quickly and very simply bid in and get the funds they need to sustain what they are doing, but also plan for the inevitable surge that we will have.“There will be people that are waiting and trying to survive every day and then will access support as quickly as they can when some of the lockdown is lifted,” she told MPs.

      https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/apr/15/domestic-abuse-killings-more-than-double-amid-covid-19-lockdown?CMP=Sha

      –-----

      Sur Counting Dead Women:
      https://seenthis.net/messages/843847

    • Les violences conjugales et la crise du Covid-19

      Les politiques publiques menées en réponse à la crise sanitaire ont eu des conséquences lourdes sur les victimes de violences conjugales, en particulier en termes spatiaux puisque le confinement est venu renforcer le contrôle spatial exercé par les hommes violents. La recherche présentée dans ce blog scientifique vise à interroger la dimension spatiale des politiques publiques menées pendant la crise et leurs effets sur les pratiques spatiales des victimes de violences et de surveillance conjugale, en vue d’accompagner l’élaboration de politiques publiques à venir, d’éviter qu’une réponse à une crise sanitaire se traduise par une mise en danger des personnes les plus vulnérables.

      Le projet fait l’objet d’un financement ANR / Fondation de France. Il se déroulera pendant une période d’un an à compter de septembre 2020. Il a été lancé par une équipe de quatre membres : #Marion_Tillous (coordinatrice scientifique), Eva San Martin Zapatero, Julie Bulteau et Pauline Delage. Pour en savoir plus sur l’équipe, voir la page « A propos ».

      https://anrcovico.hypotheses.org/1

    • Violences conjugales, un « confinement sans fin »

      La période d’assignation à domicile au printemps a provoqué une hausse importante du nombre de signalements. Augmentation liée à une aggravation des faits de violence mais aussi à une plus grande mobilisation des proches, et en particulier du voisinage.

      Si l’on comprend les violences faites aux femmes comme une « guerre de basse intensité » (Falquet, 1997), alors le confinement instauré au printemps en réponse à l’épidémie de Covid-19 a marqué une nouvelle bataille, sur un terrain bien particulier. L’assignation à résidence et les restrictions de déplacement ont renforcé l’auteur de violences conjugales dans ses exigences de contrôle. En retour, le fait pour la femme victime de ne pas pouvoir sortir n’a pas seulement restreint la possibilité pour elle de trouver des relais et des témoins aux violences qui lui étaient faites, elle a aussi réduit les interactions dans lesquelles elle était considérée comme une personne à part entière. Le fait que les écoles et la plupart des services publics soient restés fermés après la fin du confinement a prolongé cette situation.

      La violence conjugale exercée par les hommes n’est pas soudaine ou ponctuelle. Elle s’inscrit dans une stratégie d’emprise : non seulement la victime est surveillée en permanence, mais également progressivement coupée des liens avec ses proches, et placée dans une dépendance matérielle et affective vis-à-vis de son agresseur. La question spatiale est cruciale dans ce processus de contrôle et d’isolement, ce que la chercheuse Evangelina San Martin Zapatero a mis en évidence à travers le terme de « déprise spatiale » (2019). S’inspirant du concept développé en sociologie du vieillissement, elle montre que les violences conjugales ont notamment pour conséquence une forte restriction des déplacements, une perte de compétence spatiale et une dépendance au conjoint pour la réalisation des déplacements.

      L’instauration du confinement en réponse à l’épidémie de Covid-19 a inévitablement été un atout pour les agresseurs dans leur stratégie d’emprise. C’est ce que montre l’augmentation considérable du nombre de signalements de faits de violence intraconjugaux pendant la période, que ce soit en France ou dans les autres pays concernés par des mesures de confinement. Dès le 5 avril, le secrétaire général de l’ONU, António Guterres, a appelé à un cessez-le-feu dans les violences faites aux femmes. L’organisation a estimé à la fin du mois d’avril que chaque nouveau trimestre de confinement se traduirait par 15 millions de cas supplémentaires de violence basée sur le genre (projections de l’Unfpra). Le rapport de la mission interministérielle pour la protection des femmes contre les violences et pour la lutte contre la traite des êtres humains paru au cours de l’été fait état également d’une forte hausse des signalements de violences sur les plateformes d’écoute des victimes, en particulier via les modes de communications « silencieux ». Ainsi, « les tchats de la plateforme de signalement des violences sexistes et sexuelles "Arrêtons les violences" ont été multipliés par 4,4 par rapport à 2019 pour tous les faits de violences et par 17 pour les faits de violences intrafamiliales ».

      Comme l’indique le rapport, cette hausse des signalements est liée à une aggravation des faits de violence plutôt qu’à un déclenchement de nouvelles violences dans des couples non concernés avant le confinement. Elle est aussi imputable à une plus grande mobilisation des proches, et en particulier du voisinage. Car si le confinement assigne à résidence les victimes et leurs agresseurs, il transforme aussi les voisin·e·s en témoins à temps complet. Et grâce au colossal travail de sensibilisation des organisations de lutte contre les violences conjugales et au mouvement #MeToo, ces témoins ne se contentent plus de vous glisser entre deux paliers que les murs sont fins comme du papier à cigarettes, mais assument de plus en plus la responsabilité d’alerter les associations ou les forces de l’ordre.

      Si le confinement a donné des oreilles aux murs, il a aussi ôté des yeux aux institutions et aux professionnels de la protection, comme le souligne Edouard Durand, juge des enfants au TGI de Bobigny, dans son audition par la délégation aux droits des femmes et à l’égalité des chances entre les hommes et les femmes du Sénat. Il a également considérablement compliqué le travail des associations qui accompagnent les femmes victimes de violence et assurent leur hébergement d’urgence (Delage, 2020). Et révélé à quel point les moyens manquent pour offrir des solutions concrètes : favoriser le recueil des témoignages tourne court si les écoutant·e·s ne peuvent pas diriger les victimes vers des lieux d’accueil d’urgence. Les 2 millions d’euros gouvernementaux issus du Grenelle contre les violences conjugales et du redéploiement des crédits du secrétariat d’Etat à l’égalité entre les femmes et les hommes pendant le confinement sont bien maigres pour imaginer des solutions de logement à la hauteur des besoins. Et le financement de nuitées d’hôtel destinées à l’éloignement des hommes agresseurs sur cette enveloppe et non sur celle de la justice grève encore le budget.

      Les politiques publiques menées (ou non menées) pendant la crise du Covid-19 au printemps 2020, en premier lieu le confinement, ont révélé l’ampleur des violences conjugales et la dimension proprement géographique de l’emprise des hommes violents. Elles ont montré que les violences conjugales ne sont pas autre chose, pour reprendre les termes d’Annick Billon (présidente de la délégation sénatoriale évoquée plus haut), qu’« un confinement sans fin ». En 2000, la philosophe Marilyn Frye définissait déjà l’oppression comme un ensemble de forces et de barrières qui produisent des « vies confinées et contraintes ». C’est ce qui rend si impérative une loi-cadre qui réponde de manière coordonnée aux différentes dimensions de l’oppression patriarcale.

      https://www.liberation.fr/debats/2020/10/01/violences-conjugales-un-confinement-sans-fin_1801102

  • Regular soap is extremely effective at deactivating viruses.
    https://diasp.eu/p/10602983

    Regular soap is extremely effective at deactivating viruses.

    #coronavirus #COVID19 #information #pandemic

    The hydrophobic tails of the soap molecules disrupt the structure of the lipid casing and destroy it.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/13/health/soap-coronavirus-handwashing-germs.html

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/12/science-soap-kills-coronavirus-alcohol-based-disinfectants

  • I’m an epidemiologist. When I heard about Britain’s ‘herd immunity’ coronavirus plan, I thought it was satire | William Hanage | Opinion | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/mar/15/epidemiologist-britain-herd-immunity-coronavirus-covid-19

    Tous les échos que j’ai de médecins et épidémio disent la même chose : la stratégie de l’"immunité de groupe" est une vaste blague, une théorie fumeuse, bollocks, débile, criminel, assassin, inhumain, irresponsable, aberrant…

    Cet article donne des arguments détaillés sur le sujet.

    (La rubrique « Opinion » est ici bien mal nommée.)

  • Lack of paid sick days and large numbers of uninsured increase risks of spreading the #coronavirus | Economic Policy Institute
    https://www.epi.org/blog/lack-of-paid-sick-days-and-large-numbers-of-uninsured-increase-risks-of-spreadi

    The CDC released very clear instructions to help prevent the spread of respiratory diseases, including staying home when you are sick. Not everyone has that option.

    Overall, just under three-quarters (73%) of private sector workers in the United States have the ability to earn paid sick time at work. And, as shown in the figure below, access to paid sick days is vastly unequal. The highest wage workers are more than three times as likely to have access to paid sick leave as the lowest paid workers. Whereas 93% of the highest wage workers had access to paid sick days, only 30% of the lowest paid workers were able to earn sick days. In this way, access to paid sick days increases with wages among workers, disproportionately denying workers at the bottom this important security. And, low-wage workers are more likely to be found in occupations where they have contact with the public—think early care and education workers, home health aides, restaurant workers and food processors. When workers or their family members are sick, they shouldn’t have to decide between staying home from work to care for themselves or their dependents and paying rent or putting food on the table. But, that is the situation our policymakers have put workers in.

    #santé #politiques #etats-unis #travail