The end of “disruption” » Nieman Journalism Lab
►http://www.niemanlab.org/2012/12/the-end-of-disruption
Bah non, pas déjà, on commençait à peine à s’amuser :) #disruption via @hubertguillaud
For a long time now, “disruption” has been the go-to buzzword in commentary about journalism. Pundits and consultants love to say “disruption” because the word tends to attract money and attention. But the word is starting to ring hollow. Throwing it around today seems more like a way to avoid hard thinking than to engage in it. Maybe 2013 will be the year when we finally stop talking about “disruption.” I hope so, because then we can start giving as much consideration to what endures as to what changes.
Apparemment ce terme énerve beaucoup @evgeneymorozov
Forget MOOCs and disruption: for Shirky, Napster explains our primate instincts (!). This is “Shirky’s Napster Theory of Everything”.
►https://twitter.com/evgenymorozov/status/281146762251628544
Can someone create a Shirky twitter bot so that every time someone mentions “disruption,” it responds with “Look at Napster”?
►https://twitter.com/evgenymorozov/status/281146999531790337
“Maybe 2013 will be the year when we finally stop talking about ’disruption’” says Carr. He sure prefers “interruption”
►https://twitter.com/evgenymorozov/status/281330015667359744
Lequel Evgeny finit par copier seenthis, cf. ►http://seenthis.net/messages/102541
“Disruption” as a keyword seems to take off sometime in the 1960s ►http://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=disruption&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=15&smoot
►https://twitter.com/evgenymorozov/status/281357112926416896
Marrant cette fixette sur Napster, parce que précisément dans Social Network à 1h30 de film environ, Sean Parker de Napster évoque "l’ange investisseur" qui va permettre à Facebook de "franchir le cap", j’ai nommé : #Peter_Thiel [je mettrai l’extrait audio bientôt sur cette page]. cc @fil
