The Atlantic — News and analysis on politics, business, culture, technology, national, international, and food – TheAtlantic.com

http://www.theatlantic.com

  • Réveil Courrier
    https://reveil.courrierinternational.com/#/edition/1964464/article/1963861

    Confinement Poster sur Instagram, presque une “obligation morale” au temps du coronavirus
    3 MIN
    The Atlantic (Washington)
    D’après The Atlantic, le confinement est en train de changer l’usage d’Instagram : plus question d’afficher ses vacances fabuleuses ou les fêtes auxquelles on a participé. Les internautes partagent désormais des images de leur quotidien ou des activités simples auxquelles ils reviennent. Et cela crée un sentiment réconfortant de cohésion.

    Et si Instagram était le remède miracle contre la déprime induite par le confinement ? “Les réseaux sociaux sont tristement célèbres pour leur faculté prodigieuse à véhiculer la désinformation en temps de crise, mais ça n’empêche en rien les gens de s’y connecter pour satisfaire un besoin aigu de maintenir des liens avec autrui, assure dans un article d’opinion The Atlantic. En ce moment, ces plateformes remplissent une fonction essentielle.”

    Pour le journal américain, nous avons particulièrement besoin de réseaux sociaux comme Instagram aujourd’hui, alors que la pandémie de Covid-19 pousse une grande partie de la population mondiale à rester chez elle, avec peu voire pas d’interactions sociales.

    Voir ce que font les autres quand ils sont coincés chez eux a quelque chose de réconfortant. Les réactions des Italiens, des Espagnols et des Iraniens ces derniers jours, penchés à leur fenêtre pour interagir avec leurs voisins confinés, le prouvent. Il fait bon être ensemble, depuis son balcon ou sur Instagram.
    Adieu les fêtes branchées, bonjour le canapé

    D’autant que la plateforme change avec la crise sanitaire. “Désormais dépourvus du flot continu d’images montrant nos brunchs et selfies de vacances, et des vidéos assourdissantes où l’artiste en concert n’est même pas reconnaissable, les réseaux comme Instagram et Facebook se transforment en journaux intimes racontant nos journées cloîtrés à l’intérieur.” Les images de plages paradisiaques et de fêtes bondées laissent place à des photos montrant des scènes de la vie quotidienne : une connaissance en pleine vidéoconférence depuis son lit, un ami faisant la cuisine, des personnes inconnues étendues sur leur canapé…

    Et c’est une bonne chose, affirme le magazine. Sans photos de vacances ou d’événements branchés, exit le FOMO (fear of missing out, la peur de rater quelque chose parce qu’on est resté chez soi). “La banalité n’est plus taboue.” Bien sûr, il y aura toujours des utilisateurs plus cool que d’autres, “mais ils pourront nettement moins nous regarder de haut, car nous ne jalouserons plus leurs acolytes de soirées (inexistants) ou leurs occupations (traîner sur le canapé)”.
    À lire aussi :
    Réseaux sociaux. Ces stars qui n’existent pas

    Interrogée par le journal, Julia Deeb-Swihart, une doctorante spécialiste du phénomène des selfies, pense qu’avec le confinement ces autoportraits partagés sur les réseaux sociaux changent de fonction. On ne les partage plus pour “prouver qu’on a fait quelque chose”. “Les selfies pourraient aussi devenir plus drôles, car les graphistes et développeurs, en proie à l’ennui, vont sûrement mettre en ligne d’étranges filtres de réalité augmentée. Il y aura beaucoup plus de vidéos montrant des personnes ordinaires qui détaillent des recettes, nous apprennent des chorégraphies ou expliquent les règles de jeux de cartes régionaux​.”

    C’est donc le moment de “poster sans retenue”. The Atlantic va même plus loin en affirmant qu’en cette période de crise, où le moral de la population est bas, mettre en ligne des moments de la vie quotidienne est un “devoir moral”, comparable aux nombreux dons de sang effectués par les Américains après les attentats du 11 septembre 2001. “Qu’est-ce qui fait de nous un héros, un membre pleinement intégré à la communauté ? C’est notamment publier sur les réseaux, même si ça paraît un peu absurde.”
    Source
    The Atlantic
    Washington
    http://www.theatlantic.com

    L’anticipation est l’un des points forts de The Atlantic depuis sa création en 1857. Cette vénérable publication, où écrivent les plumes les plus prestigieuses du moment, a su mieux que tout autre magazine américain prendre le tournant Internet, en faisant de son site un très dynamique lieu de réflexion et de débat. Intellectuelle et placide, à l’image de sa ville d’origine, Boston, la revue agrémente ses pages de poèmes et d’illustrations recherchées. Fondée par un groupe d’écrivains quelques années avant la guerre de Sécession, elle s’est donné pour mission d’être le porte-parole de l’idée américaine. La publication des premiers textes de Mark Twain, des reportages de guerre de Nathaniel Hawthorne et de la Lettre de la prison de Birmingham (vibrante défense de la non-violence, 1963) de Martin Luther King ne dément pas cet idéal.

    Extrêmement dynamique et riche en contenus inédits, le site de The Atlantic s’est taillé une place de choix dans l’univers de la presse en ligne et est souvent cité en exemple, à un moment où la presse écrite peine à se réinventer.
    On peut aussi y consulter moyennant une somme modique tous les articles publiés depuis le premier numéro, paru en novembre 1857. Theatlantic.com revendique 4,3 millions d’utilisateurs mensuels.

    #Instagram #Coronavirus

  • “In the heat of battle, and in the chaos of war zones, soldiers, it seems, tend to humanize their robotic aides. They develop emotional attachments to the machines that put themselves in harm’s way so the humans don’t have to.

    That’s according to research conducted by Julie Carpenter, a researcher at the University of Washington who studies the emotional relationships that humans can develop with machines.”

    https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/09/funerals-for-fallen-robots/279861

    #robots

  • How Netflix Reverse Engineered Hollywood
    https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/01/how-netflix-reverse-engineered-hollywood/282679

    To understand how people look for movies, the video service created 76,897 micro-genres. We took the genre descriptions, broke them down to their key words, … and built our own new-genre generator. If you use Netflix, you’ve probably wondered about the specific genres that it suggests to you. Some of them just seem so specific that it’s absurd. Emotional Fight-the-System Documentaries ? Period Pieces About Royalty Based on Real Life ? Foreign Satanic Stories from the 1980s ? If Netflix can (...)

    #Netflix #algorithme #prédictif #profiling

  • Une critique de l’idéologie de l’innovation créative, par @xporte (titrée sans trop de rapport « Emmanuel Macron, je ne veux pas être créatif »)
    https://www.franceculture.fr/emissions/la-vie-numerique/emmanuel-macron-je-ne-veux-pas-etre-creatif

    « La suprématie culturelle que dans le culture tech en particulier nous accordons au faire - intrinsèquement considéré comme supérieur au fait de ne pas faire, de réparer, d’analyser, de prendre soin - est informé par l’histoire genrée de ceux qui font des choses qu’ils offrent au monde, au mépris de ce qui se passe ailleurs, au sein des coeurs ou des foyers. » […] il n’y a rien de rebelle dans cette idéologie du faire, elle ne pousse pas les individus à s’élever contre le système. Au contraire, elle ne fait que donner une forme un peu nouvelle aux vieilles valeurs.

    Bien sûr elle n’a rien contre le fait de fabriquer, d’innover, de créer. Le problème est le sous-entendu que l’alternative, c’est ne rien faire - et que dans ce “ne rien faire”, on entend en général faire des choses avec les autres (s’occuper des gens, par exemple).

    Why I Am Not a Maker - Debbie Chachra - The Atlantic
    http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2015/01/why-i-am-not-a-maker/384767

    #disruption #maker #care #CultureTech

  • Silicon Valley exploits time and space to extend frontiers of capitalism | Evgeny Morozov | Opinion | The Guardian
    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/29/silicon-valley-exploits-space-evgeny-morozov


    La frontière électronique a repoussé les limites du capitalisme en lui permettant d’occuper une partie grandissante de notre cerveau, corps et temps. Avec ce vecteur d’omniprésence touchant aux limites de son expansion c’est à l’espace interstellaire de reprendre le relais pour les fantaisies de croissance illimitée. Bienvenu dans le far-ouest de l’espace.

    The US Congress quietly passed an important piece of legislation this month. The Space Resource Exploration and Utilisation Act – yet to be signed by Barack Obama – grants American companies unconstrained rights to the mining of any resources – from water to gold. The era of space exploration is over; the era of space exploitation has begun!

    While the 1967 Outer Space Treaty explicitly prohibits governments from claiming planets and other celestial resources, as their property, Congress reasoned that such restrictions do not apply to the materials found and mined there.

    The bill’s timing might, at first, seem surprising – after all, Nasa, the US space agency, is almost constantly fighting against budget cuts – but is easily explained by the entrance of new space explorers on to the scene, namely the Silicon Valley billionaires who are pouring millions into “disrupting” space, Nasa, and the space programme of yore. From Google’s Eric Schmidt and Larry Page to Amazon’s Jeff Bezos and Tesla’s Elon Musk, Silicon Valley’s elites have committed considerable resources to the cause.

    And while the long-term plan – to mine asteroids for precious metals or water, which can then be used to fuel spaceships – might still be a decade or more away, Silicon Valley has a very different business proposition in mind. Space, for these companies, offers the most cost-effective way to wire the unconnected parts of the globe by beaming internet connectivity from balloons, drones and satellites.

    Morph’s Outpost on the Digital Frontier
    http://morphsoutpostonthedigitalfrontier.blogspot.de
    On arrive de loin. A l’époque de la space shuttle les limites du cyber-espace étaient encore inconnues et illimitées.

    Wired wrote briefly about Morph’s Outpost in the September/October 1993 issue, online at
    http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/1.04/streetcred.html?pg=8

    Morph’s Outpost - By Will Kreth

    Don’t knock programmers. Contrary to popular belief, many of them do have lives and look nothing like the bespectacled, pasty-faced, Jolt-cola- slurping traitorous overweight hacker depicted in Jurassic Park (personally, I was thrilled when he got eaten in the Jeep). Some of them ride mountain bikes, kayak, play alto sax and read books by Peter Matheissen. Some of them were never interested in programming until HyperCard, while others have been working on PC’s since the birth of the Altair in the ’70s. Until recently, they’ve been stuck wading through various patently dull programming magazines for the information they needed to stay on the edge.

    The rise of interactive multimedia has given birth to a new crop of programmers, and they’re starving for deep technical information about their current (albeit over-hyped) obsession. Now they have a new magazine dedicated to their cause. Morph’s Outpost on the Digital Frontier is the brainchild of Craig LaGrow, a founder of the popular Computer Language, and Editor-in-Chief Doug Millison. Augmenting the magazine’s seriously technical treatment of authoring environments and the like is a whimsical cartoon character named (what else?) Morph, who runs his Outpost on the boundary between cyberspace and the digital jungle. He’s the silicon- surfing Sherpa who’ll outfit you with the “intel” you need to make the right decisions on hardware, software, scripting tricks, and marketing your creations. Morph, who looks as if he just came out of a graffiti-artist’s spray-paint can, has assembled several notable names within the industry to contribute to the Outpost on a regular basis - like Rockley Miller (publisher and editor of Multimedia and Videodisc Monitor), Richard Doherty (editor of Envisioneering), Tony Bove (publisher and editor of the Macromedia User Journal and the Bove & Rhodes Inside Report), and Michael Moon (of the market research firm Gistics, Inc.). Do you know your XCMDs from CLUTs? Script-X from a 3:2 pull-down ratio for mastering a videodisc? Then Morph’s Outpost on the Digital Frontier is a must-read for all you seasoned media fanatics surfing the Digital Pipeline.

    Digital Work CyberTrends
    http://people.duke.edu/~mccann/q-work.htm
    Un an après la catastrophe de la Challenger l’espace sans fin du monde digital se traduisait en job opportunities sans limites.

    Work in Cyberspace
    Rise of the Personal Virtual Workspace
    Rise of the American Perestroika
    The Demise of the Job
    Rise of Entreployees
    Rise of the Movable Job
    Demise of the Department
    Rise of the Project
    Demise of the Hierarchy
    Rise of Multimedia in Corporations
    Big Business in Your Little PC
    Rise of the Digital Wealthy
    Devolution of Large Entities
    Rise of the Individual
    Rise of the Video Communications
    Rise of Internet Collaboration
    Rise of the Virtual Office
    Rise of Soft Factories
    Dematerialization of Manufacturing
    Put Your Knowledge to Work
    Rise of New Organizational Structures
    Demise of the Branch
    Rise of Document-centric Computing
    Rise of Intranet
    Rise of Knowledge Worker Hell
    Rise of a New Life in the Web
    Rise of Business Ecosystems
    Death of Competition
    Rise of New Industry Definitions
    Rise of Intellectual Mobility
    Rise of the Internet Job Engine
    Rise of Coordination-Intensive Business
    Rise of the Internetworked Business Structures
    Rise of Global Networks
    Rise of Globalization
    Rise of the Underdeveloped
    Rise of Free Agent, USA

    InfluenceHR | The Shift From Wellness to Well-being : Empowering a Workforce with a Whole-employee Approach
    http://influencehr.com/sessions/the-shift-from-wellness-to-well-being-empowering-a-workforce-with-a-who
    Depuis on chasse du cerveau dans la silicon valley , alors il faut faire des efforts pour en attirer les meilleurs.

    Speaker:
    Dr. Michael M. Moon, CEO and Principal Analyst, ExcelHRate Research and Advisory Services
    Workplace wellness is undergoing a transformation from a limited view of employee physical wellness to a more holistic view that also includes employees’ emotional, mental, and financial well-being — inside and outside the workplace. To really engage employees, employers need to provide the right balance of resources, programs, tools, and technology to enable employees to own and manage their well-being along with building a culture that supports these initiatives. The HR vendor community has a tremendous opportunity in helping employers to empower their employees to own their well-being through innovative technologies that deliver personalized learning, feedback, and targeted interventions.

    Michael Jay Moon - Wikipedia
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Jay_Moon#Awards_and_associations
    C’est l’occasion pour les vieux hippies et les habitants de première heure de la vallée de silicone de vendre quelques conférences.

    Moon was a contributing editor for Morph’s Outpost from 1993-1995, launching the magazine and writing a monthly column. A technical publication on emerging multimedia design technology, it was based on the design of ’60s underground newspapers. He was a blogger for Customer Engagement Agencies, DAM for Marketing and Engagement Marketspace. In 2000, he co-authored Firebrands: Building Brand Loyalty in the Internet Age with Doug Millison. The book is now available in 13 languages.

    Closing the Digital Frontier - The Atlantic
    http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/07/closing-the-digital-frontier/308131
    Une chosequi ne change jamais dans le monde capitaliste est l’incertitude. Où trouver the next big thing (#TNBT), commen investir, comment survivre. Alors les spécialistes annoncent des vérités assez simples pour plaire aux décervelés de la finance.

    The era of the Web browser’s dominance is coming to a close. And the Internet’s founding ideology—that information wants to be free, and that attempts to constrain it are not only hopeless but immoral— suddenly seems naive and stale in the new age of apps, smart phones, and pricing plans. What will this mean for the future of the media—and of the Web itself?

    Michael Hirschorn July/August 2010 Issue

    Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, Microsoft : Which Will Fall First ?
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2017/01/06/google-apple-facebook-amazon-microsoft-which-will-fall-first

    Which company will fall first, Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, or Microsoft? originally appeared on Quora: the knowledge sharing network where compelling questions are answered by people with unique insights.

    Answer by Terrence Yang, Angel investor, on Quora:

    I own stock in Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft, but if I had to pick which tech giant I think will fall first, I would pick Facebook.

    That being said:

    Zuckerberg’s latest moves include:
    Keeping control of Facebook even after he donated almost all his Facebook stock to charity. Facebook shareholder suit alleges secret texts from Marc Andreessen to Mark Zuckerberg.
    Being the only public company CEO to skip Trump’s tech summit. I bet most shareholders wanted him to attend.
    Making his 2017 resolution “to have visited and met people in every state in the US by the end of the year. After a tumultuous last year, my hope for this challenge is to get out and talk to more people about how they’re living, working, and thinking about the future.” Mark Zuckerberg - Every year I take on a personal... Maybe he is sincere in trying to better understand America, given that Facebook, together with Google, account for almost all the online ad revenue. Google and Facebook are booming. Is the rest of the digital ad business sinking?
    Zuckerberg said he is no longer an atheist and that religion is very important (hat tip Hunter Johnson). (Mark Zuckerberg says he’s no longer an atheist, believes ‘religion is very important’.)
    All of these moves are more consistent with someone laying the groundwork for a possible run for political office someday than with someone singularly focused on growing the Facebook empire. What would Steve Jobs do?
    People have speculated before about Zuckerberg’s aspirations to run for President. (Does Mark Zuckerberg Want To Run For President?)
    I believe his actions are an investment risk factor. At the margin, his latest moves drove some investors to sell Facebook stock (raising its cost of capital) and possibly providing cheaper capital to the Facebook’s competitors (if investors sell Facebook and buy Snap, for example).
    Facebook’s metrics are wrong, though others (Google?) may have the same issue. It’s not just Facebook: Digital advertisers say internet metrics are often wrong Facebook Says It Found More Miscalculated Metrics.
    Robert Scoble says spatial computing will dominate, meaning you will be able to physically walk around in the real world and see virtual items placed on them. Scobleizer - Entrepreneur in Residence.
    Scoble said he would ask Zuckerberg this: “How are you going to compete with a “mixed reality” release of the iPhone that’s coming in 11 months? I expect that iPhone will sell 60 million in first weekend…"
    Scoble goes on to say: “That’s more VR sold than all others combined. In one weekend … If I were at Facebook I’d get the entire Oculus team to pivot. Toward mixed reality glasses. Why? Microsoft’s execs already told me they are betting 100% on mixed reality (with its Microsoft HoloLens product). The strategy at Microsoft is “Cloud + Hololens.” That’s it. The entirety of a $455 billion company is betting on mixed reality.” Apple Strategy 2017. Very important change to iPhone coming (hat tip to Leo Harsha).
    Oculus headset sales are low. VR is taking longer to take off than some guessed. VR headset sales by device 2016 | Statista.
    Instagram is doing a great job copying Snap’s popular features and avoiding the unpopular ones (fast follower). But they don’t have anything like Spectacles yet. Instagram’s Best Move in 2016? Copying Snapchat — The Motley Fool Snapchat vs. Instagram: Who’s Copying Whom Most?
    Even Zuckerberg’s write-up and videos about Jarvis home AI reveals Facebook’s weaknesses. While Amazon, Google and Apple can combine hardware and software to give you a better, more seamless experience via Echo/Alexa or the Google and Apple equivalents. To date Facebook only has software.
    Some others cite Microsoft or Apple as the most likely to fail. I disagree.

    SILICON VALLEY (THE BIG FIVE) RULEZ

    Tech Companies Are Dominating the Stock Market as Never Before (July 29 2016)
    http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2016/07/29/the_world_s_5_most_valuable_companies_apple_google_microsoft_amazon_facebook.

    Tech’s ‘Frightful 5’ Will Dominate Digital Life for Foreseeable Future ( JAN. 20, 2016)
    https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/21/technology/techs-frightful-5-will-dominate-digital-life-for-foreseeable-future.html?_r

    The Big 5 are Apple, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook
    (August 2, 2016)
    http://www.greenm3.com/gdcblog/2016/8/2/the-big-5-are-apple-google-microsoft-amazon-facebook

    The Big 5 Year in Review : Apple, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Facebook (December 29, 2015)
    https://stratechery.com/2015/the-big-5-year-in-review-apple-google-microsoft-amazon-and-facebook

    #silicon_valley #capitalisme #technologie #disruption

  • Brooke Harrington’s Capital Without Borders: An Excerpt - The Atlantic
    http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/09/wealth-managers/499064
    La sociologie des riches vu à travers les yeux d’un gestionnaire de patrimoine.

    elite clients may ask wealth management professionals to undergo a contemporary version of the trials of Hercules. Another English practitioner who is nearing the end of a forty-year career in Hong Kong had a particularly impressive story of an impossible task set him by a client bent on testing his trustworthiness:

    I was phoned up from Osaka once, by a client who said, “I’m sitting across from Owagi-san, who speaks no English, but we are bowing to each other. He has just said to me through a translator that he needs a thousand sides of smoked salmon by Tuesday, and I’m relying on you to get them.” I said, “I’m your wealth manager, not your fishmonger.” And the client said, “Well, today you’re a fishmonger.” So I had to ring up a friend who knew the guy from Unilever who runs the smoked salmon plant in Scotland. And the plant manager made it happen. So I found out later that my client was testing me by setting me an impossible task—he told me that he was trying to see if I was really up to the kind of job he wanted me to do.

    The story is reminiscent in some ways of the tales of knightly quests, complete with seemingly insurmountable obstacles and abject humiliations (“today you’re a fishmonger”)—with a shipment of smoked salmon in place of the Holy Grail. The question behind the impossible task remains consistent: Are you truly devoted?

    Clients may also have a pragmatic reason for posing these tests: They allow the client to discover whether the wealth manager possesses the kind of social networks and influence necessary to provide extraordinary personal service. In this case, being “up to the kind of job” the client wanted depended not just on personal resolve but also on knowing the right people, in this case a friend with connections at Unilever. This is consistent with previous research showing that elite professionals serve their clients in part by acting as commercial “matchmakers,” facilitating opportunities that are not available publicly. For example, a study of 19th-century British lawyers showed how their familiarity with clients’ business dealings allowed them to create whole new industries, such as the country’s railroad system; the professionals established a kind of private market, accessible only to the upper crust of British society. Access to such opportunities hinged entirely on trust between clients and professionals, and the related perception of exclusivity. As the study concluded, “To avail oneself of opportunities, one has to be ‘one of us.’”

    Capital Without Borders: Wealth Managers and the One Percent
    By Brooke Harrington
    Harvard University Press, 400pp, £22.95
    ISBN 9780674743809
    Published 29 September 2016

    Brooke Harrington - Capital without Borders: Wealth Managers and the One Percent - ValueWalk
    http://www.valuewalk.com/2016/09/brooke-harrington-capital-without-borders-wealth-managers-one-percent

    Capital without Borders: Wealth Managers and the One Percent (Harvard University Press, 2016) is an innovative approach to addressing a problem that is even more pressing than income inequality—wealth inequality. Recognizing that the wealthy are “notoriously difficult to study,” Harrington, a sociologist, decided to focus instead on wealth managers. In some ways, however, they are even less accessible. As professionals, they are constrained by privacy considerations. Moreover, as a group they have come under attack for being “agents of money laundering and tax evasion” and are thus suspicious of outsiders. To overcome this barrier to access, Harrington trained for two years to gain certification by STEP (Society of Trust and Estate Practitioners) as a wealth manager herself. Between 2008 and 2015 she conducted 65 interviews with wealth managers in 18 countries.

  • #Kissinger criticizes the #Obama Doctrine, talks about the main challenges for #Trump, and explains how to avoid war with #China:
    0https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/12/the-lessons-of-henry-kissinger/505868

    Americans think that the normal condition of the world is stability and progress: If there is a problem, it can be removed by the mobilization of effort and resources, and when it is solved, America can return to isolation. The Chinese believe that no problem can ever be finally solved. Therefore, when you talk to Chinese strategists, they talk about process rather than ad hoc issues. When you talk to U.S. strategists, they generally try to look for solutions. [..] To Beijing, a solution is simply an admission ticket to another problem. Thus, the Chinese are more interested in trends. They ask, “Where are you going ? What do you think the world will look like in 15 years ?

  • The Lessons of Henry Kissinger: Trump [may] react to a terror attack in a way that suits their purposes
    http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/12/the-lessons-of-henry-kissinger/505868

    HK: But at some point, events will necessitate decision making once more. The only exception to this rule may be nonstate groups; they may have an incentive to provoke an American reaction that undermines our global position.

    JG: The threat from isis is more serious now?

    HK: Nonstate groups may make the assessment that Trump will react to a terror attack in a way that suits their purposes.

    C’est Jeffrey Goldberg qui explicite “ISIS”. Kissinger répète “nonstate groups”.

  • Win in China! - The Atlantic
    http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2007/04/win-in-china/305700

    We became so interested that in December we traveled to Beijing to be in the audience at CCTV’s cavernous main studio for the live, final episode, in which one grand champion was chosen from five remaining contestants. Like many other Chinese reality shows, this one featured a segment known by the English letters “PK.” This means nothing to most English speakers (penalty kick?), but it is widely recognized in China as meaning “Player Kill” in online games.

    The PK stage of Win served the function of the Tribal Council in Survivor or the Boardroom in The Apprentice: After a contest or judges’ assessment each week, two of that episode’s competitors ended up pitted against each other in a three-minute lightning elimination. This is PK, in which one opponent issues a question, challenge, or taunt, and the other tries to answer, outwit, and provoke the first. Once done speaking, a competitor slams a hand down on a big button, stopping his or her own clock (as with a chess-match timer) and starting the opponent’s. Faster and faster, each contestant tries to manage the time so as to get the very last word. The audience gasps, cheers, and roars with laughter at the gibes—and at the end, one contestant is “killed,” as determined by audience vote or a panel of judges. Even if you can barely follow the language, it’s exciting.

    But something else distinguishes Win in China—not just from the slew of other reality shows but also from its American model, The Apprentice, with Donald Trump. “The purpose of The Apprentice was very functional,” Wang Lifen, the producer and on-camera host of the show, told me (in English) shortly after the final episode. “There’s some job that already exists, and Donald Trump is just looking for somebody to fill it, while providing entertainment.” Wang said that she had higher ambitions for her show: “We want to teach values. Our dream for the show is to enlighten Chinese people and help them realize their own dreams.” Having seen the program and talked with contestants and compared it with some superficially similar Chinese reality shows, I don’t scoff at what she said.

    The didactic and uplifting ambitions of the show could be considered classically Chinese, the latest expression of a value-imprinting impulse that stretches from the Analects of Confucius to the sayings of Chairman Mao. Or they could be considered, like the Horatio Alger novels of young, muscular America, signs of an economy at an expansive moment when many people want to understand how to seize new opportunities. Either way, the particular message delivered by the show seems appropriate to China at this stage of its growth. Reduced to a moral, Win in China instructs Chinese people that they have chances never open to their compatriots before—but also that, as one contestant told me at the end of the show, “The only one I can rely on is myself.”

    #Chine #télévision #Trump #idéologie

  • The kingdom’s murky relationship to terrorism
    http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/09/saudi-arabia-obama-al-qaeda-terrorism/502343

    Much of Saudi support is done by non-state actors. Yet that does not absolve the Saudi government of responsibility. These non-state actors enjoy a range of relationships with the Saudi regime. Some receive or did receive official patronage. Others, particularly those tied to leading clerics in the kingdom, are embraced indirectly by the regime’s self-proclaimed role as defender of the faithful. [..]

    In addition, the Saudi royal family itself occupies an unusual role. In one sense, the royal family—with its tens of thousands of princes—is not the government. However, the finances of the family and the government are interwoven, and if a prince supports a group it has an unofficial imprimatur of approval. King Salman himself, for example, helped raise money for the mujahideen in Afghanistan and the Balkans.

    Many of these voices are responsible for indoctrination rather than direct violence. That is to say, they might propagate views on the satanic nature of Jews, the apostasy of Shiites, or the heretical nature of the Ahmadiyyas, [...]. Such support, in the United States, would often be considered distasteful but part of protected free speech. For terrorists, however, it can prove invaluable as it provides theological legitimacy for their actions, enabling them to attract recruits and funds.

    #terrorisme #arabie_saoudite #Saoud #wahhabites #wahhabisme

  • #Finance Is Ruining America
    http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/09/fairfield-county/501215

    The reason? It’s two-fold: First, there is the rise of the financial industry, which has fueled extraordinary wealth for a very few without creating good jobs down the line, and, second, a tax policy that not only fails to mitigate these effects, but actually incentivizes them in the first place. It’s probably not surprising, then, that the 10 states with the biggest jumps in the top 1 percent share from 1979 to 2007 were the states with the largest financial service sectors, according to the Economic Policy Institute analysis.

    [...]

    While income inequality may be particularly apparent in Connecticut, the things that are fueling it—financialization and the tax code—are causing problems across the country. It will be national policy—such as increasing taxes on top earners—that could lead to less of the financial wizardry that benefits so few people. Yet policies to address income inequality nationally often focus on helping those at the bottom make more; groups such as the Center for American Progress propose raising the minimum wage, increasing access to preschool, and expanding apprenticeships to help low-skilled workers get into higher-paying jobs. But as the example of Fairfield County shows, the struggles of those at the bottom are at least in part a consequence of the rise of extreme wealth. Without changes to the incentives people have to make and keep tons of money, help for the poor and middle-class won’t likely make much of a difference.

    #pauvreté #pauvres #riches #Etats-Unis #politique