Ouvert et fermé, par Evgeny Morozov

Série en cours sur Slate.com (j’aime bien les papiers de ce Farhad en général)

– Farhad Manjoo and Evgeny Morozov debate Morozov’s new book on “the folly of technological solutionism.”
▻http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/features/2013/to_save_everything_click_here/to_save_everything_click_here_farhad_manjoo_and_evgeny_morozov_debate_morozov
– What Farhad Manjoo gets wrong about my book. ▻http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/features/2013/to_save_everything_click_here/to_save_everything_click_here_what_farhad_manjoo_gets_wrong_about_my_book.htm

▻http://seenthis.net/spip.php?page=recherche&recherche=morozov&x=0&y=0 #Morozov

Blowing up Morozov’s « To Save Everything, Click Here »
▻http://boingboing.net/2013/04/14/blowing-up-morozovs-to-sav.html
la recension de Tim Wu dont il est question, et qui n’a pas trop aimé :
►http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/book-review-to-save-everything-click-here-by-evgeny-morozov/2013/04/12/0e82400a-9ac9-11e2-9a79-eb5280c81c63_story_1.html

Does Morozov have an alternative vision of technology’s future? Generally, he decries the search for perfect, efficient solutions and admires an inefficient, organic chaos of the kind favored by Jane Jacobs in urban design. Funny, that’s exactly what the Internet’s protocols brought to communications, as a response to the big TV networks and AT&T’s “perfect” network. The ideology behind the Internet’s protocols accepts greater inefficiency to allow for the organic life and death of applications and firms. Hence, if you had to name one technology that best serves the principles Morozov believes in, it would be easy: It is called the Internet.