Home | AlterNet

http://www.alternet.org

  • Having a Facebook Account Is to Beg to Be Manipulated | Alternet
    http://www.alternet.org/media/having-facebook-account-beg-be-manipulated?akid=12021.108806.Q4wCTa&rd=1&s

    The average Facebook user sees only 20 percent of the 1,500 stories per day that could have shown up in their news feed. The posts you receive are determined by algorithms whose bottom line is Facebook’s bottom line. The company is constantly adjusting all kinds of dials, quietly looking for the optimal mix to make us spend more of our time and money on Facebook. Of course the more we’re on Facebook, the more information they have about us to fine-tune their formulas for picking ads to show us. That’s their business model: We create and give Facebook, for free, the content they use and the data they mine to hold our attention, which Facebook in turn sells to advertisers.

    John Kenneth Galbraith called advertising “the management of specific demand.” Ads tell us stories, which are all variants of: If you buy this, you’ll be happy. Their words and images were tested on audiences even before Don Draper was a boy, and now digital analytics gives marketers new attention management techniques to use on us. Today, every tweet, every YouTube or blog post aspires to be viral, and when that happens, no one complains that some cat or cute kid or Kardashian has used Orwellian mind-control to manipulate our mood.

  • Major Study: Monsanto GMO Corn Can Cause Damage to Liver and Kidneys, and Severe Hormonal Disruption | Alternet
    http://www.alternet.org/food/major-study-demonstrates-monsanto-gmo-corn-product-can-cause-damage-liver-

    A scientific study that identified serious health impacts on rats fed on ’Roundup ready’ GMO maize has been republished following its controversial retraction under strong commercial pressure. Now regulators must respond and review GMO and agro-chemical licenses, and licensing procedures.

    A highly controversial paper by Prof Gilles-Eric Séralini and colleagues has been republished after a stringent peer review process.

    The chronic toxicity study examines the health impacts on rats of eating a commercialized genetically modified (GM) maize, Monsanto’s NK603 glyphosate-based herbicide Roundup.

    Dr Michael Antoniou, a molecular geneticist based in London, commented, "Few studies would survive such intensive scrutiny by fellow scientists.

    "The republication of the study after three expert reviews is a testament to its rigour, as well as to the integrity of the researchers. If anyone still doubts the quality of this study, they should simply read the republished paper. The science speaks for itself.

    “If even then they refuse to accept the results, they should launch their own research study on these two toxic products that have now been in the human food and animal feed chain for many years.”

    An ’urgent review’ of pesticide licensing is needed

    Given these concerns, said Holden, “there is a strong case for an urgent review of the regulatory process for licensing both the herbicide Roundup and the neonicotinoid class of insecticides. A fundamental review of the entire process for licensing agricultural chemicals is required to ensure that in future the public interest is better served.”

    Professor Pete Myers, Chief Executive of Environmental Health Sciences and scientific advisor to the SFT points out that only “the tiniest fraction of agricultural chemicals” have been studied for health effects by independent scientists:

    "Over the last two-decades there has been a revolution in environmental health sciences that suggests the proportion of diseases attributable to chemical exposures is far bigger and more significant than previously understood.

    "The tools we have available to us to say what is safe and not safe are deeply flawed. They are not based on two decades of development in the fields of endocrine disruption and epigenetics, but instead on tests developed in the 1950s.

    “They do not reflect the complexity of mixtures, or the way in which chemicals interact.”

  • The Future of Birth Control ? Remote-Control Contraceptives | Alternet
    http://www.alternet.org/sex-amp-relationships/future-birth-control-remote-control-contraceptives

    The company is now working on securing the device’s data flow, so you can rest easy knowing your birth control prescription comes with encryption. In a report released last year, the FDA warned that wireless medical devices are susceptible to hacking:

    “Many medical devices contain configurable embedded computer systems that can be vulnerable to cybersecurity breaches. In addition, as medical devices are increasingly interconnected, via the Internet, hospital networks, other medical device, and smartphones, there is an increased risk of cybersecurity breaches, which could affect how a medical device operates.”

    Evidemment, côté sécurité on est tranquille, c’est la Fondation Bill and Melinda Gates qui finance...

  • Couple Fined $750, Threatened With Jail for Feeding Homeless People | Alternet
    http://www.alternet.org/hard-times-usa/couple-fined-750-threatened-jail-feeding-homeless-people

    According to the Daytona-Beach News Journal, a sign at the park reads: “Social services activities including, but not limited to, food banks and feeding programs are prohibited.” According to NBC News, one of the volunteers cited with these fines just recently escaped homelessness and wanted to help give back. 

    Debbie Jimenez said they refuse to pay the fines and will stand up to the police. “We were given 10 days to either pay the fine or tell them we’re going to court,” she told NBC. “We’re going to court.

  • They Are Watching You—How the U.S. Is Secretly Creating a Border Surveillance State

    With the agility of a seasoned Border Patrol veteran, the woman rushed after the students. She caught up with them just before they entered the exhibition hall of the eighth annual Border Security Expo, reaching out and grabbing the nearest of them by the shoulder. Slightly out of breath, she said, “You can’t go in there, give me back your badges.”

    http://www.alternet.org/immigration/they-are-watching-you-how-us-secretly-creating-border-surveillance-state

    #USA #frontière #surveillance

  • Study Says Ethanol Does Not Qualify as a ’Renewable Fuel’ | Alternet
    http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/independent-study-says-ethanol-does-not-qualify-renewable-fuel

    The peer-reviewed study, which cost $500,000 and was paid for with a federal grant, concludes that biofuels made with corn byproducts release 7% more greenhouse gases in the early years compared with conventional gasoline. Thus, they don’t even come close to meeting current federal standards to qualify as a renewable fuel source.

  • Walmart Worker: Why Did the Waltons Get $8 Billion in Subsidies While I Had to Pay Taxes? | Alternet
    http://www.alternet.org/activism/walmart-worker-why-did-waltons-get-8-billion-subsidies-while-i-had-pay-tax

    April 15, 2014 |

    While millions of working- and middle-class Americans pay taxes each year, the richest family in the world—the Waltons—received nearly $8 billion in tax breaks last year, according to a new report by Americans for Tax Fairness, a campaign fighting for progressive tax reform.

    That’s why Walmart worker Richard Reynoso and his fellow co-workers decided to bring the $7.8 billion tax bill to Walmart Chairman Rob Walton’s doorstep on Tuesday. Reynoso traveled from his home in Southern California to Phoenix, Arizona to bring this unfairness to light.

    “We’re just trying to get him to hear us as workers that that kind of money — it shouldn’t just all go to him,” Reynoso said. “He should spread the wealth… and give back to the workers who are struggling.”

    The report stated that in 2013, Walmart received about $6.2 billion in federal taxpayer subsidies because its employee wages are so low. Many employees, in turn, are forced to rely on healthcare, food stamps and other taxpayer-funded programs. The corporation then further evaded $1 billion through tax breaks and loopholes. The Walton family, in addition, avoided about $607 million of taxes on their Walmart dividends.

    The action was part of OUR Walmart, an organization of Walmart employees demanding respect in their workplace. Reynoso, who has been working at Walmart for three years, said he joined OUR Walmart eight months after working for the corporation when he realized what it’s really like working there.

    At first, orientation “makes you feel so valued as a worker.” Reynoso said. “They throw all these Sam Walton quotes at you like … ‘We’re a Walmart family. We’re respected,’ ‘You can succeed here. You can make a career out of this if you put in your all.’”

    But after giving it his all, he shortly realized that was not the case. A few months after he started, Reynoso was disciplined for clocking out for lunch a minute after working five hours straight. Labor law in California states that employees may not work more than five hours straight without a lunch break. Reynoso said he was late because his manager had asked him to do a favor. It took a year for that disciplinary action to clear from his profile, which restricted him from moving up in the workplace.

    Reynoso, who makes $10 an hour, but works only about 24 to 32 hours a week, was excited at first about Walmart’s health plans. He enrolled in one and went for a checkup and X-ray he had been putting off. But when he received the huge bill, he realized his health insurance hardly covered anything. He was forced to trade in his car in order to pay the bill off. He now receives Medi-Cal, state-funded health insurance.

    Reynoso said that while he struggles financially, he plans on continuing to fight back against Walmart.

    “If it wasn’t for family members helping me out, I don’t know what food I would have eaten for the past few years,” he said. “I know I’m not the only one working hard and paying my taxes the right way. And having someone who makes all these billions of dollars and pay, if anything, less than what I’m paying in taxes isn’t right.”

    #Walmart
    #Waltons
    #Subsidies
    #Taxes

  • Noam Chomsky: Ecology, Ethics, Anarchism | Alternet
    http://www.alternet.org/economy/noam-chomsky-ecology-ethics-anarchism?paging=off&current_page=1

    ... the settler-colonial societies are a striking illustration of, first of all, the massive destructive power of European imperialism, which of course includes us and Australia, and so on. And also the — I don’t know if you’d call it irony, but the strange phenomenon of the most so-called “advanced,” educated, richest segments of global society trying to destroy all of us, and the so-called “backward” people, the pre-technological people, who remain on the periphery, trying to restrain the race to disaster. If some extraterrestrial observer were watching this, they’d think the species was insane. And, in fact, it is. But the insanity goes back to the basic institutional structure of RECD ["really existing capitalist democracies- not accidentally, pronounced “wrecked”]. That’s the way it works. It’s built into the institutions. It’s one of the reasons it’s going to be very hard to change.

  • Is the US Backing Neo-Nazis in Ukraine ? | Max Blumenthal
    http://www.alternet.org/tea-party-and-right/us-backing-neo-nazis-ukraine

    An Anarchist group called AntiFascist Union Ukraine attempted to join the Euromaidan demonstrations but found it difficult to avoid threats of violence and imprecations from the gangs of neo-Nazis roving the square. “They called the Anarchists things like Jews, blacks, Communists,” one of its members said. “There weren’t even any Communists, that was just an insult.”

    “There are lots of Nationalists here, including Nazis,” the anti-fascist continued. “They came from all over Ukraine, and they make up about 30% of protesters.”

    La seconde partie de l’article est plus originale : Max décrit les liens entre ces expatriés urkrainiens « très à droite » et la droite américaine.

    Many surviving OUN-B members fled to Western Europe and the United States – occasionally with CIA help – where they quietly forged political alliances with right-wing elements. “You have to understand, we are an underground organization. We have spent years quietly penetrating positions of influence,” one member told journalist Russ Bellant, who documented the group’s resurgence in the United States in his 1988 book, “Old Nazis, New Right, and the Republican Party.”

    In Washington, the OUN-B reconstituted under the banner of the Ukrainian Congress Committee of America (UCCA), an umbrella organization comprised of “complete OUN-B fronts,” according to Bellant. By the mid-1980’s, the Reagan administration was honeycombed with UCCA members, with the group’s chairman Lev Dobriansky, serving as ambassador to the Bahamas, and his daughter, Paula, sitting on the National Security Council. Reagan personally welcomed Stetsko, the Banderist leader who oversaw the massacre of 7000 Jews in Lviv, into the White House in 1983.

    “Your struggle is our struggle,” Reagan told the former Nazi collaborator. “Your dream is our dream.”

  • Robert Reich: Inequality Has Warped the Minds of America’s Rich | Alternet
    http://www.alternet.org/economy/inequality-has-warped-minds-americas-rich?akid=11516.108806.AozX20&rd=1&sr

    February 16, 2014 | This originally appeared on Robert Reich’s blog.

    America has a serious “We” problem — as in “Why should we pay for them?”

    The question is popping up all over the place. It underlies the debate over extending unemployment benefits to the long-term unemployed and providing food stamps to the poor.

    Yet this doesn’t explain why so many wealthy America’s are also exiting. They’ve never been richer. Surely they can afford a larger “we.” But most of today’s rich adamantly refuse to pay anything close to the tax rate America’s wealthy accepted forty years ago.

    Perhaps it’s because, as inequality has widened and class divisions have hardened, America’s wealthy no longer have any idea how the other half lives.

    Being rich in today’s America means not having to come across anyone who isn’t.

  • Selling Your Secrets: The Invisible World of Software Backdoors and Bounty Hunters | Alternet
    http://www.alternet.org/selling-your-secrets-invisible-world-software-backdoors-and-bounty-hunters

    Back in the 1990s, the Clinton administration promoted a special piece of NSA-designed hardware that it wanted installed in computers and telecommunication devices. Called the Clipper Chip, it was intended to help scramble data to protect it from unauthorized access — but with a twist. It also transmitted a “Law Enforcement Access Field” signal with a key that the government could use if it wanted to access the same data.

    Activists and even software companies fought against the Clipper Chip in a series of political skirmishes that are often referred to as the Crypto Wars. One of the most active companies was RSA from California. It even printed posters with a call to “Sink Clipper.” By 1995, the proposal was dead in the water, defeated with the help of such unlikely allies as broadcaster Rush Limbaugh and Senators John Ashcroft and John Kerry.

    A decade after the Crypto Wars, RSA, now a subsidiary of EMC, a Massachusetts company, had changed sides. According to an investigative report by Joseph Menn of Reuters, it allegedly took $10 million from the National Security Agency in exchange for embedding an NSA-designed mathematical formula called the Dual Elliptic Curve Deterministic Random Bit Generator inside its Bsafe software products as the default encryption method.

    Take Vupen, a French company that offers a regularly updated catalogue of global computer vulnerabilities for an annual subscription of $100,000. If you see something that you like, you pay extra to get the details that would allow you to hack into it. A Vupen brochure released by Wikileaks in 2011 assured potential clients that the company aims “to deliver exclusive exploit codes for undisclosed vulnerabilities” for “covertly attacking and gaining access to remote computer systems.”

    It’s increasingly clear that the online world is, for both government surveillance types and corporate sellers, a new Wild West where anything goes. This is especially true when it comes to spying on you and gathering every imaginable version of your “data.”

    The simple truth of the matter is that most individuals are easy targets for both the government and corporations. They either pay for software products like Pages and Office from well known manufacturers like Apple and Microsoft or download them for free from game companies like Activision, Rovio, and Zynga for use inside “reputable” mobile devices like Blackberries and iPhones.

    These manufacturers jealously guard access to the software that they make available, saying that they need to have quality control. Some go even further with what is known as the “walled garden” approach, only allowing pre-approved programs on their devices. Apple’s iTunes, Amazon’s Kindle, and Nintendo’s Wii are examples of this.

    But as the Snowden revelations have helped make clear, such devices and software are vulnerable both to manufacturer’s mistakes, which open exploitable backdoors into their products, and to secret deals with the NSA.

  • Boob Deodorant? The Latest Absurdity From the Beauty Industry | Alternet
    http://www.alternet.org/boob-deodorant-latest-absurdity-beauty-industry?akid=11435.108806.d1iS0j&r

    In fact, inventing problems with women’s bodies and then offering a cure – if you pay up – is the primary purpose of the multi-billion dollar beautyindustry. More than 20 years ago, Naomi Wolf wrote The Beauty Mythchallenging that exact phenomenon. Since then, the industry has only gotten bigger, and the range of made-up problems women need to “cure” only wider.

    Of course, human beings throughout history have altered their appearance, to indicate membership in a group, to denote status or to appear attractive. What counts as “attractive” may vary wildly across cultures and traditions, but the pursuit of beauty is important to many human beings in many different societies around the world. An interest in the aesthetic isn’t weakness or vanity. It’s the foundation of art, of design, of architecture, of many of any given culture’s most treasured developments. It’s not shallow or frivolous for women and men to interest ourselves in our own personal aesthetic, devoting time and care to how we look. There can be an art in dressing and doing your hair and make up, not to mention a female-centric passing down of traditions and practices. Lipstick alone is not propping up the patriarchy.

    But socially obliging women as a class to present in a certain way that necessitates the expenditure of time, money and effort is.

    Beauty culture can be a lot of fun, and I’m not immune to it. Sephora knows I own enough lipstick for a bus full of human women. It’s also a major burden. And when industries are so transparently trying to stoke our insecurities in order to get us to buy more stuff, our ears should perk up a little bit and we should ask: is this about the fun in playing with the aesthetics of our physical bodies? Or is this someone trying to get me to buy a thing by convincing me that something is terribly, embarrassingly wrong with my body?

  • Why Do Some Americans Speak So Confidently When They Have No Clue What They’re Talking About?
    http://www.alternet.org/corporate-accountability-and-workplace/leadership-training-or-bullshit-training-harvard-price-pseudo

    The Harvard Business School information session on how to be a good class participant instructs, “Speak with conviction. Even if you believe something only 55 percent, say it as if you believe it 100 percent,” Susan Cain reported in her bestselling book Quiet. At HBS, Cain noticed, “If a student talks often and forcefully, then he’s a player; if he doesn’t, he’s on the margins.”

    (...)

    Our society once routinely called people “bullshit artists” if they spoke with total certainty without any basis for such certainty so as to persuade others and get attention for themselves. Nowadays, bullshit training is called “leadership training” and unashamedly taught at “elite institutions” and at expensive leadership seminars.

  • Dave Eggers: US Writers Must Take a Stand Against NSA Surveillance | Alternet
    http://www.alternet.org/dave-eggers-us-writers-must-take-stand-against-nsa-surveillance?akid=11290

    The recent petition by Writers Against Mass Surveillance, issued last week and signed by 562 writers around the world, is an essential step toward an international digital bill of rights. But until there is such a thing, there will be hundreds of millions of people, writers among them, living under the assumption that every inquiry or communication they make could later be used against them.

    #NSA #pétition #écrivains #littérature

  • The Ayn Rand-Worshipping Sears CEO That Blew Up His Multibillion Dollar Empire | Alternet
    http://www.alternet.org/economy/eddie-lampert-and-ayn-rand

    Lampert is now known as one of the worst CEOs in America — the man who flushed Sears down the toilet with his demented management style and harebrained approach to retail. Sears stock is tanking. His hedge fun is down 40 percent, and the business press has turned from praising Lampert’s genius to watching gleefully as his ship sinks. Investors are running from “Crazy Eddie” like the plague.

    That’s what happens when #Ayn_Rand is the basis for your business plan.

  • Jane Goodall and Vandana Shiva: Why Women Are Key to Solving Climate Crisis | Alternet
    http://www.alternet.org/environment/jane-goodall-and-vandana-shiva-why-women-are-key-solving-climate-crisis?ak

    VANDANA SHIVA: The first thing is to bring it down from the stratosphere. I think one reason the climate movement on the grassroots has taken longer to grow than movements around biodiversity conservation or water, etc., is because everyone got so overwhelmed with the parts per million, and everyone was looking at the graphs and how they climb and the hockey stick. And looking at the hockey stick is something that is out of control. There’s nothing you can do. But every emission begins on the ground. And every mitigation and adaptation action is on the ground. That’s why I wrote my book, Soil Not Oil. I was starting to feel worried that not only were we only dealing with the IPCC reports, that had kind of become the only place you could act, and go to the climate summits, but we were missing the biggest piece of where do greenhouse gas emissions come from.

    And I think if there’s one thing women can bring to this discussion, in addition to those beautiful words that Jane used of love and compassion, the capacity to have compassion is the capacity to see connections. That’s the disease that the deeply patriarchal mindset has not been able to overcome, that they can’t transcend fragmentation and separation and thinking in silos, and, worse, thinking as if we are separate from the Earth, and therefore, as masters and conquerors, there’s just another experiment of control that you need the freedom to have. And I think we need to give a message saying, no, the Earth was not made by you, therefore you can’t fool around further. You’ve already messed up enough. Stop these geo-engineering experiments.

  • Top 10 Ways the US Is the Most Corrupt Country in the World
    http://www.alternet.org/print/top-10-ways-us-most-corrupt-country-world

    Those ratings that castigate Afghanistan and some other poor countries as hopelessly “corrupt” always imply that the United States is not corrupt.

    While it is true that you don’t typically have to bribe your postman to deliver the mail in the US, in many key ways America’s political and financial practices make it in absolute terms far more corrupt than the usual global South suspects. After all, the US economy is worth over $16 trillion a year, so in our corruption a lot more money changes hands.

    1. Instead of having short, publicly-funded political campaigns with limited and/or free advertising (as a number of Western European countries do), the US has long political campaigns in which candidates are dunned big bucks for advertising. They are therefore forced to spend much of their time fundraising, which is to say, seeking bribes. All American politicians are basically on the take, though many are honorable people. They are forced into it by the system. House Majority leader John Boehner has actually just handed out cash on the floor of the House from the tobacco industry to other representatives.

    When French President Nicolas Sarkozy was defeated in 2012, soon thereafter French police actually went into his private residence searching for an alleged $50,000 in illicit campaign contributions from the L’Oreale heiress. I thought to myself, seriously? $50,000 in a presidential campaign? Our presidential campaigns cost a billion dollars each! $50,000 is a rounding error, not a basis for police action. Why, George W. Bush took millions from arms manufacturers and then ginned up a war for them, and the police haven’t been anywhere near his house.

    American politicians don’t represent “the people.” With a few honorable exceptions, they represent the the 1%. American democracy is being corrupted out of existence.

    2. That politicians can be bribed to reduce regulation of industries like banking (what is called “regulatory capture”) means that they will be so bribed. Billions were spent and 3,000 lobbyists employed by bankers to remove cumbersome rules in the zeroes. Thus, political corruption enabled financial corruption (in some cases legalizing it!) Without regulations and government auditing, the finance sector went wild and engaged in corrupt practices that caused the 2008 crash. Too bad the poor Afghans can’t just legislate their corruption out of existence by regularizing it, the way Wall street did.

    3. That the chief villains of the 2008 meltdown (from which 90% of Americans have not recovered) have not been prosecuted is itself a form of corruption.

    ...

    Americans are not seen as corrupt because we only deal in the big denominations. Steal $2 trillion and you aren’t corrupt, you’re respectable.

    #corruption #corruption_légale #États-Unis

  • 1 in 10 Americans Uses a Smartphone During Sex? | Alternet
    http://www.alternet.org/1-10-americans-uses-smartphone-during-sex?akid=11189.108806._Bxuph&rd=1&sr

    But the more intriguing suggestion is that at the other end of the economic scale, those in work are increasingly blurring the boundary between the office and home by taking their laptops and smartphones into the bedroom. The most obvious impact is simple: if people are still checking emails after midnight, that leaves little time to do anything else. They are too busy for sex. And if it’s not work they’re doing when they stare at the glowing screen but playing a game or checking Twitter, then they’re still too distracted to notice the living, breathing person next to them.

    The intrusion of the smartphone into our lives works in other ways too. Another survey found one in 10 Americans used their iPhones or BlackBerries during sex, a figure that doubles among the young. What are they using them for exactly? Is it mainly as a camera, to produce a string of X-rated selfies? Or is something else going on?