Sexism on Wikipedia Is Not the Work of ’A Single Misguided Editor’

/134875

  • Wikipedia éjecte les romancières américaines

    http://www.lesnouvellesnews.fr/index.php/cafouillage/66-sexisme-ordinaire/2788-wikipedia-ejecte-les-romancieres

    Un autre article sur le même sujet

    Trop de romanciers aux Etats-Unis ? Wikipedia crée une catégorie « femmes romanciers américains » qui les invisibilise dans les palmarès des romans

    « Wikipedia’s Sexism », c’est le titre d’un billet énervé de la romancière américiane Amanda Filipacchi publié dans le New York Times de dimanche dernier. Elle a remarqué il y a quelques jours que les éditeurs bénévoles du site sortaient, une par une, les femmes de la catégorie “American Novelists”, « romanciers américains » pour les cataloguer dans la sous-catégorie “American Women Novelists”, « femmes romanciers américains », celles dont les noms commencent par A ou B ayant été les premières exclues avec 300 autres.

    #wikipedia

  • Wikipedia et sexisme, des liens signalés par wikipediocracy

    Wikipedia – Men and children first | Wikipediocracy
    http://wikipediocracy.com/2013/01/22/wikipedia-men-and-children-first

    Wikipedia – Men and children first

    By Nathalie Collida and friends

    It’s no secret that Wikipedia has a shortage of female editors. According to a survey commissioned by the Wikimedia Foundation in 2011, a mere 8.5 per cent of the people contributing to the online encyclopaedia identify as women. In a recent op-ed piece for the Los Angeles Times, Sue Gardner – who became the figurehead of Wikipedia when she signed up as Executive Director with the Wikimedia Foundation 5 years ago – tried to explain this by focusing on what she perceives as the “geeky, tech-centric, intellectually confident, thick-skinned and argumentative” nature of the average Wikipedian. Outside observers, among them Web2.0 expert Joseph Reagle, add another component to the mix: good old-fashioned sexism. His latest study, “’Free as in sexist’ Free culture and the gender gap” examines how the combative locker-room culture of Wikipedia’s male contributors – a good portion of whom are teens and pre-teens – makes women less likely to participate. While Reagle’s journal article relies heavily on previously published analyses and interviews with Wikipedians, we’ve decided to take a look under the bonnet of Ms Gardner’s million-dollar on-line empire, with examples taken not just from articles but also from areas of the encyclopaedia and its sister projects often overlooked by its readers: the talk pages of articles and editors as well as various discussion boards.

    A feminist’s Wikipedia biography | Wikipediocracy
    http://wikipediocracy.com/2013/01/29/a-feminists-wikipedia-biography

    A feminist’s Wikipedia biography

    By Andreas Kolbe

    Anita Sarkeesian is a media critic and video blogger whose work focuses on sexism in video games. Her video blog, Feminist Frequency, is used as reading material in numerous universities’ women’s studies courses. Last year Sarkeesian became the target of a sustained harassment campaign because of her Kickstarter project, Tropes vs. Women in Video Games. The attacks on her were coordinated from various video game forums.

    Sarkeesian was subjected to a torrent of hate on YouTube – thousands of abusive and often sexually explicit hate messages. At the same time, her Wikipedia biography was vandalised. Sarkeesian herself spoke of harassment via Wikipedia vandalism.

    Wikipedia’s culture of sexism – it’s not just for novelists. | Wikipediocracy
    http://wikipediocracy.com/2013/04/29/wikipedias-culture-of-sexism-its-not-just-for-novelists

    Wikipedia’s culture of sexism – it’s not just for novelists.

    by Nathalie Collida and Andreas Kolbe
    With research contributions from Delicious carbuncle and Eric Barbour

    Amanda Filipacchi’s New York Times article about Wikipedia’s ghettoization of female novelists finally shone the spotlight on some of the rampant sexism that pervades almost every corner of the online “encyclopaedia”. Filipacchi said she had “noticed something strange on Wikipedia”:

    It appears that gradually, over time, editors have begun the process of moving women, one by one, alphabetically, from the “American Novelists” category to the “American Women Novelists” subcategory. So far, female authors whose last names begin with A or B have been most affected, although many others have, too. The intention appears to be to create a list of “American Novelists” on Wikipedia that is made up almost entirely of men.

  • Wikipedia Decides to Segregate American Women Authors | Alternet
    http://www.alternet.org/wikipedia-decides-segregate-american-women-authors?akid=10364.108806.EOdaA

    Wikipedia editors have started quietly moving female authors out of the “ American novelists” category and into a newly-created sub-category for “ American women novelists,” with the intention, it seems, of creating an”American novelists” page comprised entirely of men. There is currently no corollary sub-category for “American men novelists.”

    • Because Wikipedia is user-edited, as more people learn about the strange sub-category, it appears they are taking it upon themselves to reverse it. Since news broke on Tuesday, Filipacchi reports that she has already seen some women’s names returned to their rightful place on the main page, though there is still much work to be done.

      à nouveau, la même difficulté à faire une analyse critique des mouvements (de travers) de #wikipédia : si t’es pas content, modifie toi-même…

      #sexisme