The Economist publie un article totalement farfelu sur le Liban, dont l’argument central est de prétendre ceci :
▻http://www.economist.com/news/middle-east-and-africa/21592634-civil-war-neighbouring-syria-putting-ever-greater-strain-lebanon
Politically fractious and geographically dispersed, Lebanon’s Sunnis have no similarly dominant militia. And Syria’s strife has sapped the influence of traditionally moderate Sunni leaders. With Lebanon’s current government unable to control arms smuggling, radical Sunni gangs have proliferated, many with links to Syrian rebels. Lebanon’s Christians, meanwhile, remain split, too. Some back a Hizbullah-led, pro-Syrian political front known as March 8th. Others, along with much of Lebanon’s diverse but militarily impotent political centre, back the rival, pro-Western, Saudi-supported March 14th group, of which Mr Shatah was a figurehead.
Grosse difficulté, la personne qui, dans le journal, a choisi la photo d’illustration en a trouvé une très belle, lors des funérailles de Muhammad Shatah :
Donc, pas de « milice sunnite dominante », une claire séparation entre un 14 Mars « pro-occidental » et les « gangs sunnites radicaux »… mais on montre un très beau drapeau…