Bad interview techniques create false memories. People can be convinced they committed a crime that never happened
▻http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/news/releases/people-can-be-convinced-they-committed-a-crime-they-dont-remem
Bad interview techniques create false memories. People can be convinced they committed a crime that never happened
▻http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/news/releases/people-can-be-convinced-they-committed-a-crime-they-dont-remem
How to screw learning with one simple belief
▻http://pjf.id.au/ethics/2014/01/25/how-to-screw-learning-with-one-simple-belief.html
This. Right here. Look at it.
It’s a graph showing the performance of children after they’ve been praised for their intelligence (“you must be smart”) versus their effort (“you must have put a lot of effort into that”), and then given a series of hard problems to try to solve. The kids who are taught that effort count increase in the number of problems they can solve. Those who are told that they’re smart show a frightening decrease.
Le titre abrégé du papier (de 1998) : Praise can undermine motivation
Et complet Praise for Intelligence Can Undermine Children’s Motivation and Performance ▻http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/mrg/MuellerDweck1998.pdf
Un article plus récent sur l’effet non pas du type d’éloge mais de leur intensité :
When Being Called “Incredibly Good” Is Bad for Children
▻http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/news/releases/when-being-called-incredibly-good-is-bad-for-children.html
Researchers found that adults seem to naturally give more inflated praise to children with low self-esteem. But while children with high self-esteem seem to thrive with inflated praise, those with low self-esteem actually shrink from new challenges when adults go overboard on praising them.
Ça rappelle furieusement la #communication_non_violente (#CNV). Ça m’avait frappé à l’époque mais même si elle est utilisée en général pour résoudre les conflits, elle est aussi pertinente pour les situations où l’on cherche à exprimer sa gratitude. Car finalement un jugement même « positif » reste un jugement, donc enfermant et violent. La preuve éclatante ici. Par contre la phrase la mieux notée correspond juste à la partie « fait » de la CNV, ça serait encore plus puissant si la phrase comportait le sentiment que ça provoque en nous et les besoins comblés.
Taking photos reduces our capability to remember,
and perhaps seenthis too
The camera on the smartphones of today allow people to take photos of everything they see, like, and want to share, sometimes with the motivation to better remember one’s life.
Studies show that paradoxally, this may have the opposite effect compared to people who spend the time of observing instead of photographing.
It makes sense, as people tend to snap a quick shot of something they like, thinking they have stored it away for later reference; but the truth is that doing so reduces the likelihood they will actually really remember details of what they have stored away.
This study is interesting because in this FOMO world where we are overloaded with information, we want to make sure we “remember” everything we came across and many of us here on seenthis.net expose themselves to the same consequence of the study: we quickly archive links whose contents we have skimmed and deemed interesting, thinking we have stored it somewhere in our external memory (seenthis), but chances are we will forget. We will just remember we read something about something, but we reduce the longer term recollection of the actual contents of what we read.
Point-and-Shoot Memories:
The Influence of Taking Photos on Memory for a Museum Tour
Linda A. Henkel, Fairfield University, December 2013
Two studies examined whether photographing objects impacts what is remembered about them. Participants were led on a guided tour of an art museum and were directed to observe some objects and to photograph others. Results showed a photo-taking-impairment effect: If participants took a photo of each object as a whole, they remembered fewer objects and remembered fewer details about the objects and the objects’ locations in the museum than if they instead only observed the objects and did not photograph them. However, when participants zoomed in to photograph a specific part of the object, their subsequent recognition and detail memory was not impaired, and, in fact, memory for features that were not zoomed in on was just as strong as memory for features that were zoomed in on. This finding highlights key differences between people’s memory and the camera’s “memory” and suggests that the additional attentional and cognitive processes engaged by this focused activity can eliminate the photo-taking-impairment effect.
People report that they take photographs and record videos as a way to remember events in their lives. [...] On the other hand, taking photos may have a detrimental impact on memory. Photographing a scene may divide one’s attention, similar to when people multitask by using cell phones while driving or walking or laptop computers while learning material. People may also pay less attention to a scene if they take photos, counting on the external device of the camera to “remember” for them, as suggested by research showing that people were less likely to remember information if they expected to have future access to it (e.g., on an external storage device, such as a computer, or via the Internet ;
#apwall: full academic research paper:
pdf : ▻http://docdroid.net/89wv
txt : ▻http://pastebin.com/DHDXKBB3
▻http://edition.cnn.com/2013/12/10/health/memory-photos-psychology
►http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/news/releases/no-pictures-please-taking-photos-may-impede-memory-of-museum-t
Linda A. Henkel:
▻http://cdn2.dailyvoice.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/article_vertical/fairfieldpsychprofessorhenkel.jpeg
see also related : ▻http://seenthis.net/messages/218931
#photograph
#memory
#transactive_memory
#FOMO
#remember
#seenthis
Je n’ai aucune mémoire des visages et de l’écoulement du temps. Je peux me souvenir d’un cade d’accès chiffré vu une seule fois jusqu’à 15 ans après, mais je peux ne pas reconnaître une personne rencontrée la veille. Je peux me souvenir de tous les détails d’une journée, mais je ne sais pas si c’était il y a 3 mois ou 3 ans. Je sais rarement ce que j’ai fait la semaine dernière.
Et ça a toujours plus ou moins été comme cela.
Du coup, les photos m’ont aidé à me souvenir. Je vais dans l’index chronologique de mon logiciel de classement de photos et je vois ce qui s’est passé à quelle date. Pour moi, c’est magique !
Oui Agnès, tout à fait compréhensible, et c’est précisément pourquoi l’étude précise également :
In addition, the present study examined only the role of photographing objects, not what happens when people review those photos after taking them. Past work has shown that reviewing photos can provide valuable retrieval cues that reactivate and retain memories for the photographed experiences.
Les avoir en possession (et savoir où elles se trouvent) peut avoir une valeur inestimable pour la personne, pour diverses raisons. Mais encore faut-il, donc, pouvoir les retrouver :
although research has suggested that the sheer volume and lack of organization of digital photos for personal memories discourages many people from accessing and reminiscing about them
...chose qui ne semble poser aucun problème dans votre système de classement-assisté.
J’utilise DigiKam. Avec sa frise chronologique, ses étiquettes et son géoréférencement, j’ai retrouvé une mémoire des dates et des lieux.
Shotwell est vraiment bien foutu tout en étant sobre, une fois qu’on l’a configuré pour qu’il ne change pas les dossiers à notre place. (J’ai juste un problème car je ne voudrais pas qu’il scanne les Raws, mais c’est une autre histoire…)
Pareil : chronologie, étiquettes hiérarchisables, et surtout écriture de toutes les infos à l’intérieur de chaque JPG pour la pérennité.
Si vous pouviez m’aider à me rappeler de ce que j’ai photographié la dernière fois, je retrouverais peut-être mon appareil photo que j’ai perdu à ce moment là…
Prendre des photos peut interférer avec la mémoire - SMH
▻http://www.smh.com.au/technology/sci-tech/taking-photos-interferes-with-memory-study-20131211-2z4oc.html
Selon une étude - ►http://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/news/releases/no-pictures-please-taking-photos-may-impede-memory-of-museum-t - de l’université de Fairfield dans le Connecticut, prendre une #photo plutôt que de se concentrer pleinement sur l’événement empêche le souvenir de s’installer. Tags : internetactu internetactu2net fing #psychologie #cognition #image photo (...)