• Riddle of the Ages Solved: Where Did the Philistines Come From? - Archaeology - Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/life/archaeology/1.676943

    Until now, the “Sea Peoples Invasion” theory postulated that the Philistines arose and swept over the region from a base in the Aegean. But recent discoveries at a remote archaeological site in southeast Turkey indicate that the Philistines were already there as the great civilizations collapsed. Amidst the thunderous implosion around them, the Philistines somehow thrived – and supplanted the Hittite rule in that area, apparently making it their home base.

    This unexpected conclusion is supported by new explanations of anomalies found at Tel Tayinat, an archaeological site in the Amuq plain, which spans the border of modern Syria and Turkey.

    Not the Sea People we thought
    Tel Tayinat contains the ruins of a city going back thousands of years. Evidence found at the site proves that its ancient name was Kunulua (or Calno).

    Until recently, it was assumed that the site was Hittite because of its location, and that after their empire collapsed its residents evolved into the “neo-Hittite” culture which continued using the ancient names, artistic styles and symbols of the Hittites. Who exactly the “neo-Hittites” of Kunulua were remained a mystery – until now. They were, archaeologists are starting to believe, the Philistines.


    Tell Tayinat is located about 25 kilometers inland, not where the capital of the sea-faring Philistines was expected to be located.
    Credit: Google Maps, elaboration by Haaretz


    Luwian hieroglyphics on a stele found in Sultanhan, Turkey
    Credit: Georges Jansoone, Wikimedia Commons

    #Philistins #peuples_de_la_mer #louvite

  • Il y a pas des bisounours dans tous les stades.
    http://www.haaretz.com/life/sports/.premium-1.675775
    Tout ça même pas contre la présence des réfugiés mais juste contre l’idée de payer 1€ de leur ticket à de l’humanitaire. En effet l’accueil de réfugiés a déjà été fermement exclu par Netanyahu, qui s’est montré aussi ouvert que les pays du Golfe (et bien plus xénophobe que n’importe quel état européen, Hongrie inclue). Même si le centre-gauche a réclamé l’ouverture d’un débat : http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.675475
    On rappellera que le statut de réfugié a, historiquement, été créé en grande partie pour les juifs, en considérant que pendant la seconde guerre mondiale les frontières avaient été trop fermées.

  • Just outside Gaza, but light years away: limp ’peace concert’ was a sorry show - Music & Theater - - Haaretz Daily Newspaper | Israel News

    http://www.haaretz.com/life/music-theater/.premium-1.660104

    As the darkness fell last Thursday, it seemed that Gaza was getting closer and closer. The pale lights, glinting feebly over the soccer field at Kibbutz Kfar Aza, located just two kilometers from the Gaza border, got brighter and brighter as the sun was going down and the “Cross Borders Concert” began with the sounds of Mozart’s Requiem at around 8:30 in the evening. Hope for peace seemed to be beating in the hearts of the crowd that gathered for the special concert, and the lack of peace was that much more present, so close to the border.

    #israel #gaza #concert #musique et donc #sorry_show (new tag)

  • TV show ’Fauda’ offers angle that Israelis usually prefer not to see - The Israeli action-drama series was created by Israelis who know what is really going on. As such, it does not try to present a ’balanced view’ of the conflict with the Palestinians.
    By Michael Handelzalts | May 15, 2015 | | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/life/movies-television/.premium-1.656438

    Each of the 12 episodes of “Fauda” (an Israeli action-drama series on the Israeli-Palestinian rift that takes place in the very here-and-now, and which just finished its run on Yes Action) opens with a disclaimer: that it is “a work of fiction, and not based on facts.” This in itself sort of prods the viewer to disbelieve it and seek grains of truth in the soil of the on-screen action.

    “Fauda” means, literally, “chaos” in Arabic. It was a general term for what was going on in the occupied Palestinian territories (a.k.a Palestine, the West Bank, Judea and Samaria, Greater Israel or The Land of Our Forefathers) before 1987, when it became an intifada (of which we have had opus 1 and 2, and are gearing up for 3, God forbid). More specifically, it is the code word of alert in a particular Israeli undercover unit operating in the territories, meaning that their cover has been blown and they must “act” or “abort” and flee immediately. In both instances it means, “hell has just broken loose.”

    It has been common knowledge, at least since the mid-1990s, that in order to maintain its control over the Palestinian territories, the IDF must resort to a sort of overtly black op tactic. Volunteers who served in elite fighting units and are willing and ready to assume an Arab guise – false biography, alias, language, manners, looks – infiltrate into the fabric of life on the West Bank with the aim of providing firsthand intelligence and act with lethal efficiency if need be.

    To clarify – though any clarification is a sort of obfuscation: Such units are anything but covert, as their existence is openly confirmed; and yet they 
certainly fall under the category of “black op” stuff by the very nature of their activities.

    That is the fertile ground that spawned the 12 episodes of the first season of “Fauda” and you can still – and it is certainly worthwhile – binge-watch it on Yes VOD. A second season is in the planning stages, and talks are underway for the series to be broadcast as is – not as a remake – both in the U.S. and Europe.

    Don’t feel deterred from watching it for fear you may not be able to follow the Hebrew. Most of it is in Arabic anyway (there are Hebrew subtitles), as more than half the characters are Palestinian and settings are in the Palestinian territories. That was, by the way, one of the series’ distinctions in Israeli TV viewing: For the first time the Israeli mainstream viewer was presented, on prime time TV, with a not-too-distorted mirror of his or her reality in a language that has – 
regretfully – a mainly menacing sound to many Israeli ears.

    The series is the brainchild of Lior Raz (writing and acting as the main character) and Avi Issacharoff (at one time a Haaretz reporter on Palestinian matters). Both have considerable mileage in double-and-triple lives on the other side of the Israeli-Palestinian divide – Raz as a member of one of those undercover units, and Issacharoff who has been covering this very confusing reality on a day-to-day basis. The expressed aim was to present the everyday reality that most Israelis prefer not to see up close, and instead of simplifying it in black and white, to show that it is made up of more than 50 shades of all-too-human gray that can explode at any moment into the most crimson red.

    Tangled story

    It is basically the story of a showdown in the making (and remaking). The team leader of an undercover crypto-
Palestinian unit (Doron Kavillio, played by Raz) has retired after assassinating a Hamas arch-villain, Abu Ahmed, a.k.a. “The Panther,” and is leading an uneasy family life producing wine. When it transpires that The Panther is very much alive and planning to unleash another wave of atrocities on the Israelis, Doron succumbs to the temptation to enlist again and execute the “second killing” of his now personal nemesis. What was, at least theoretically, a national-security affair in which there are good and bad guys, with “our” side being “good” and the “other” (i.e. Palestinian) being “bad,” becomes a tangled story of conflicted 
individuals who are all, in their own way, very human, meaning deeply flawed.

    There are Doron’s team members – a family of men, all-for-one and one-for-all, with possible male rivalry issues – and their assorted nearest and dearest, women and children included and extracting all expected emotional value. There is one woman, as befits any action series; she is Nurit, played by Rona-Lee Shimon. There are the Palestinians with their warring political factions and family entanglements, which are more convoluted due to characters living in constant hiding and fear. Waves of personal and political confusion flow constantly from one side to another, and the viewer finds himself constantly tempted to identify with the other side of the conflict from the one he or she lives in.

    The series was created by Israelis who know what is really going on. As such it takes the Israeli side for granted and does not try to present a “balanced view” of the conflict. It assumes – rightly in my mind – that for Israeli viewers, the dice is loaded for the home (Israeli) team. As a result, it sometimes looks as though the Palestinian side of the story is presented with an extra dose of understanding and compassion. If indeed this is so, it is a belated and much needed redress: It is high time for Israelis to accept that there are human beings on the other side as well.

    The series was shot in Israel in Hebrew and Arabic, with the cast and crew being Israeli and Palestinian, during the days of the war in Gaza last summer. The production teams for the “Tyrant” and “Dig” series – which also take place in the Middle East – fled. But the “Fauda” team remained on location in Kafr Qasem, as if to prove that while it claims to be “fiction,” it is an extremely gripping and terribly depressing story based on true and painful facts – very well made and brilliantly acted. And hell keeps breaking loose around us as we watch.

  • Israeli artist Shira Geffen takes the heat for criticizing the war in Gaza - Movies & Television - Israel News | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/life/movies-television/.premium-1.653671

    In the last few months writer and filmmaker Shira Geffen found herself in the eye of two media storms sparked by the explosive friction between artists who dare to express an opinion about their surrounding reality — and that painful, forlorn reality, which displays ever decreasing tolerance of criticism.

    It first happened last summer during Operation Protective Edge at the Jerusalem Film Festival, when Geffen asked the audience at a screening of her film to stand for a minute of silence in memory of four Palestinian children killed that day by Israel Defense Forces fire. The second time was a few weeks ago when her father, the songwriter Yehonatan Geffen, was assaulted at home for comments he made about the left’s less of the election.

    In an interview two weeks after the incident, Shira Geffen demonstrated steadfastness and determination by not retracting previous statements. Instead of panicking over the venomous criticism directed at her, she explains her position. Instead of caving into pressure she insists she will keep expressing her views the way she was taught to do. Instead of apologizing for politics penetrating her work, she expresses hope it will engender change.

    Amid the storms, Gefen’s creative projects still remain at the core, and as usual she skips with surprising ease between different, varied fields. Last December her sixth children’s book, “Sea of Tears,” was published. She is now promoting her second film, “Self Made,” while writing her first television drama series with her partner writer Etgar Keret. She is also busy writing her next feature film, “Accompanying Parent,” about a girl’s coming of age. Her other interests — theater, dance, acting and songwriting — have to patiently wait their turn. Even Geffen has her limits.

    Being multidisciplinary does not make her work shallower, Geffen says. She certainly isn’t sorry her multiplicity of tasks prevents her from specializing in one profession.

    “I’m not a linear person at all. I’m all about breadth, being associative,” she says. “That’s how I write and think. That’s how I think I develop.”

    Geffen, born in 1971, never studied film, but this fact didn’t stop “Jellyfish” — the film based on her script and co–directed with Keret (who also has no film education) — from debuting at the 2007 Cannes Film Festival. It even won the Camera d’Or, the prize for best first feature film. Seven years later, when she finished the first film she had written and directed on her own, she was invited back to the prestigious French film festival. The critics praised “Self Made,” and the film made the long festival circuit around the globe. Along the way, Geffen won AFI’s New Auteurs Critics’ Award and picked up two awards at the Jerusalem Film Festival.

    The heroine of “Self Made,” which will debut next weekend (translated into English) in Israel, is Michal (Sarah Adler), a successful Jerusalem artist. One morning, just before going abroad for an important event, her bed breaks. She hits her head and loses her memory. One army roadblock away lives Nadine (Samira Saraya), a young Palestinian woman whose internal reality is also a bit shaken. By coincidence, the two women exchange identities at the roadblock. Nadine is sent off to live the life of the Jerusalem artist, and Michal is sent to live Nadine’s life in her Palestinian village.

    Shopping instead of exploding

    Geffen conceived the film’s original idea a decade ago, when she read a Haaretz interview with Arin Ahmad, a Bethlehem student whose fiance was killed by soldiers.

    “They contacted her when she was in pain and sadness, and recruited her for a suicide operation, to be a shahida ("women martyrs"). They dressed her as an Israeli woman, put an explosive belt on her and sent her to the Rishon Lezion pedestrian mall,” recalls Geffen. In the interview she said she reached the mall, saw people shopping, and what she wanted to do was go into the stores and shop. That moment aroused in me the question when and where does the will to live awaken? Suddenly, I imagined the continuation. What would have happened if she had entered the stores and because of the explosive belt looked like a pregnant woman, and would start trying on maternity dresses and buying things for the expected baby. My imagination suddenly went there. In reality, Arin Ahmad suddenly had regrets and decided not to blow herself up, but this moment basically drove me to write the script.”

    Geffen consequently researched the subject of shahidas. She visited Ramallah six years ago to see the home of the first female suicide bomber, Wafa Idris.

    “I was scared. It was my first time in Ramallah, and before I entered her home, I was really afraid of what I would say, how I would speak with her mother. I had a lot of fears,” she says. “And then, when I went in, I saw an elderly, tired woman, and the first thing she did when she saw me was hug me. I saw behind her a huge poster of her dead daughter, and during this hug I suddenly felt her daughter, the one she didn’t have. It was all mixed in my head. I was suddenly her daughter, who wanted to kill me, and this confusion — the understanding that all is one, and suffering is suffering, and that a woman who loses her daughter is a woman who loses her daughter no matter where, and that I can be anyone’s daughter — is basically one of the things that brought me to writing the script.”

    Geffen recalls that she then said to herself that if she chose to live in this complex, volatile place, she had to say something about it, so she decided that would be the next thing she’d do.

    Neither shock nor dismay

    Last summer, “Self Made” was screened in Jerusalem’s International Film Festival just as Operation Protective Edge was beginning. The directors whose films were competing in the Israeli festival got together and decided to use this stage to protest the war. They convened a press conference and called on the government to agree to a ceasefire. They protested the tendency of the local press not to investigate what was transpiring in Gaza and read the names of 30 Palestinian children killed in IDF bombings there.

    Culture Minister Limor Livnat called the protest a “disgrace” on her Facebook page, but Geffen and her colleagues kept protesting throughout the festival. Geffen took the most flak after calling for a moment of silence. Some in the audience jeered her. Some left the hall in protest. Social media went wild. The curses and invectives spread across the Internet, and the news broadcasts and newspapers reported it widely.

    Looking back, Geffen explains that she had read the headline about the children’s deaths that morning and was filled with pain and sorrow. She felt she couldn’t remain quiet.

    “I felt the need to present the names of the children, who in another moment would be forgotten. So I did what I did. I didn’t think at that moment about how it would reverberate, and I was surprised to discover how much rage people have,” she recalls. “When I mentioned the minute of silence, a minute when people are used to standing and remembering the soldiers, it was suddenly perceived as treason. But for me it was instinctive, and I’m not sorry about it. I am not sorry that I am humane. I think I acted from a place of connectedness, and all the harsh criticism about me was very sad and also very scary.”

    The threats she endured for expressing her opinion are nothing new to the Geffen family. Eight months later, a man showed up at her father’s front door, and attacked and beat him, calling him a murderer and traitor, a few days after comments he made at a concern. The elder Geffen had said that Election Day, March 17, would be declared “the peace camp’s Nakba Day,” referring to what Palestinians call their catastrophe, the day Israel was established. Gefen also called Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a “racist,” and charged that Netanyahu’s regime was based on “scaring the people.”

    Ynet wrote the Geffen family was in shock and dismay [over the election results], but Shira Geffen says the family was neither in shock nor dismay.

    “All these years, which have encouraged polarization, have led to this. All the walls and barriers between the Palestinians and us, and among us, this racism, what Netanyahu said (on Election Day) about Arab droves — these things don’t come out of nowhere,” she says, referring to the prime minister’s warning that the Arabs are “coming out to vote in droves.”

    “My father said it most precisely: It’s not a matter of right and left. There is no more right and left. There’s humanism and fascism. And in this place they’ve already forgotten what it is to be humanistic, what it is to be a human being,” she says. “My father was attacked because he spoke against the [last] war and the next war. And people, like Michal Kayam, the character from my film, have a very short memory. Repressing wars is something this place is expert at. No one here talks anymore about Protective Edge and the people who died and the soldiers who died, except for Michal Kasten Keidar (widow of Lt. Col. Dolev Keidar, who fell in the operation), who broke the automatic circle of mourning and expressed pain, and even then they came down hard on her,” she says referring to the widow who spoke out against the Gaza war in a recent interview in Haaretz. "Why was my father attacked? Because he spoke about this taboo, about the war that was and the children who will die in the next superfluous war.”

    #Shira-Geffen

    • Avant la fille, Yonathan Geffen, son père, avait été attaqué à son domicile
      http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/.premium-1.648048
      Writer Yehonatan Geffen was attacked at his home near Netanya on Friday afternoon, when an intruder burst into his house, tried to hit him, branded him a leftist traitor and then fled.

      Geffen has been a vocal critic of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s reelection last week.

      Israel Police combed the area around Moshav Beit Yitzhak but could not find the assailant. The police said they assumed the incident was premeditated.

      The author and journalist’s manager, Boaz Ben Zion, said he hoped the incident was a one-off, adding, “We don’t know yet why Yehonatan was attacked, and we hope the police catch the assailant.”
      #Yonathan-Geffen

  • This time, it’s the art collectors on display - Arts & Leisure - Israel News | Haaretz

    http://www.haaretz.com/life/arts-leisure/.premium-1.653084

    The number of art exhibitions that deal with the local art scene from a critical sociological standpoint can be counted on one hand, with fingers to spare. In Israel, we usually remain far from this sort of discussion, or automatically relegate it to the past.

    Around here, when speaking of reflection, one is referring to artistic elements such as the use of space, materials and form, and the tensions among these, or else to the private symbols of the language of the self. There are exhibitions that purportedly deal with ideology and history, but really revolve around the narrative of (Zionist) collectivity and what happened to it. Exhibitions that wail and moan without naming names, that seem to imply that privatization, occupation, gentrification and so on are just forces of nature.

    #art #israël #occupation #colonisation

  • When Albert Einstein flirted with Holy Land girls
    New documentary based on Albert Einstein’s travel diary from his visit in pre-state Israel reveals prophetic insights about Zionism - but he was most impressed by the women and Jewish laborers.
    By Gili Izikovich | Feb. 3, 2015 Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/life/movies-television/.premium-1.640652

    Albert Einstein, the most famous Jewish scientist in history, wrote a letter in 1929 to his friend Chaim Weizmann, an accomplished chemist who would later become Israel’s first president. But their correspondence had little to do with scientific subjects. Weizmann served then as president of the British Zionist Federation, and his friend Einstein was writing to him about the Jewish and Zionist question.

    “Should we be unable to find a way to honest cooperation and honest pacts with the Arabs, then we have learned absolutely nothing during our 2,000 years of suffering and deserve all that will come to us,” he wrote, adding, “Should the Jews not learn to live in peace with the Arabs, the struggle against them will follow them for decades in the future.”

    What seems to be a prophetic statement may be attributed to Einstein’s experience in the Holy Land. Four years previously, in early February 1923, Einstein and his wife Elsa came to the reviving Jewish Yishuv in Palestine for a historic visit. Einstein received a royal reception and the crowd sang “Here comes the messiah” in his honor, but the “messiah” was in no hurry to give in to that. He summed up his visit with succinct humor in his travel diary, which has become the basis of a documentary entitled “Einstein Be’eretz Hakodesh” (“Einstein in the Holy Land”) .

  • New play puts spotlight on Israel’s 1948 war of independence
    Marat Parkhomovosky’s ’1948’ is inspired by Benny Morris’ historical book about the formation of the state, and has triggered much discussion among audiences.
    By Tamar Rotem | Feb. 3, 2015 |Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/life/music-theater/.premium-1.640403

    It’s not every play where the audience stays seated after the applause has died down. Usually, the lights come up and the audience members leave the auditorium in a hurry, speaking with one another about trivial matters. But after the show “1948” at the Tmoona Theater in Tel Aviv last month, most of the audience stayed in their seats, silent.

    No discussion about the Israeli War of Independence – the topic of the show – had been scheduled. But when the writer and director Marat Parkhomovosky, and Prof. Gad Kiner, the scholar and actor, suggested to the audience that they speak spontaneously, it seemed as if they had broken through a closed door.

    “There was a feeling we had allowed people to talk about a subject they are usually afraid to touch,” Parkhomovosky recalls. No one made any insulting remarks, although that was only the beginning of the show’s run.

    “1948” was born out of a moment of enlightenment Parkhomovosky experienced when he read Benny Morris’ book, also called “1948.” Morris’ insights about the War of Independence, particularly the reasons that led to the war and the Arabs’ flight in 1948 – still known as “the refugee problem” – were an eye-opener for him, since, as he says, they showed the distortion in the structuring of the history of the state’s establishment as it is taught in schools. Since Parkhomovosky, 35, writes for the stage, his immediate thought was that he had to adapt the book for the theater and show the truths that Morris had uncovered to the public at large.

    In his research, Morris retells the Zionist narrative of the establishment of the State of Israel and investigates the roots of the conflict. He documented the history of the War of Independence stage by stage, analyzed the birth of the refugee problem and uncovered dark episodes – particularly the cruelties perpetrated by Jewish combat soldiers during the war. According to Parkhomovosky, the Israelis’ bleeding wound is concealed in the history of that war, even more than the start of the occupation in 1967.

    “People talk about the War of Independence using the myth of the few against the many,” Parkhomovosky says. “We know about the war from the invasion of the Arab countries after independence was declared. But events took place before then that nobody talks about. My personal feeling is that the entire current Israeli experience is based on repression, and this repression makes it difficult – for me as well – to breathe and create.

    “Zionism actually wiped out the Arab culture here,” he adds. “But we don’t want to, or we cannot, deal with that original sin, which dictates our behavior and defines our existence and the management of the conflict to this day.”

    Despite his immediate urge to adapt Morris’ book, which was published in 2008, it took a few years for the show to take shape. Parkhomovosky, who writes cultural reviews on websites, faced a dilemma that was neither intellectual nor moral. It was an aesthetic, artistic and almost trivial question: How can one adapt a laconic, dry, scientific and impartial history book, such as Morris’ excellent work, for the theater?

    The show “1948,” whose next performances are tonight and tomorrow night, is not realistic. Rather, it is a combination of a realistic framework and a largely detached journalistic interview between a reporter – Parkhomovosky himself – and Morris (played by Kiner), and performance art that exposes the behind-the-scenes mechanism of the show. It moves between a play based on text and the movement art at its center. At first, Parkhomovosky is on the stage, playing himself, but also playing the interviewer. It is misleading for a few moments. Where exactly is the line between reality and fiction?

  • The quiet boycott: When Israeli art is out
    A conference in Tel Aviv will explore the impact of the BDS movement on the country’s contemporary art scene.
    By Shany Littman | Jan. 8, 2015 | Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/life/arts-leisure/.premium-1.635914

    For most Israelis, the cultural boycott of the country is felt mainly when a famous singer or a movie star decides not to come here to perform or attend a film festival. But the boycott, which has been in place officially since 2005 as part of the wider campaign of boycotts, divestment and sanctions, also exists in the field of art, and Israeli artists and art institutions are strongly affected by it. It is practiced overtly as well as covertly, officially and unofficially, and by a variety of groups within the art world.

    The boycott includes the refusal of Arab and Palestinian artists to take part in exhibitions abroad that include the works of Israeli artists and the refusal of foreign artists to show their work in Israel. The purpose of the boycott is to raise awareness about the Israeli occupation and Israeli violations of human rights.

    On Thursday, a conference, organized by seven curators working in Israel, will be held at Tel Aviv’s Leyvik House, titled Dalut Hacherem: The Cultural Boycott of Israel and What It Means for Israeli Contemporary Art. The organizers — Chen Tamir, Leah Abir, Hila Cohen-Schneiderman, Joshua Simon, Omer Krieger, Udi Edelman and Avi Lubin — will discuss the manifestations of the cultural boycott as it relates to Israel’s contemporary art scene.

    In a report summing up her year-long study of the issue, Tamir notes that the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel, the main organization behind the effort, focuses mainly on artists, curators and institutions abroad that deal with the Foreign Ministry and other official bodies and much less on what happens within Israel. PACBI, as the organization is called, “recognizes that Israeli artists, Jews and Arabs alike, are allowed to receive funding from the Ministry of Culture and Sports, the same way they are allowed to receive water if they pay taxes,” Tamir says, adding, “They don’t want to do PR for Israel. That is why the boycott is directed outward, and attempts to recruit actors from outside to put pressure on Israel.”

    Tamir, who was born in Israel and raised in Canada, holds a Master’s Degree in Curatorial Studies from the Center for Curatorial Studies, Bard College; a B.F.A. in Visual Art; and a B.A. in Anthropology from York University in Toronto. She returned to Israel two and a half years ago and is the curator of the Center for Contemporary Art in Tel Aviv. She also works with Artis, a nonprofit organization based in New York that supports and promotes artists from Israel internationally. She says that when she meets people in her field abroad, the issue of the cultural boycott against Israel always comes up.

    Tamir’s report began as an internal document for Artis, and only later was a decision made to organize a conference around it.

    “Many people in the field asked me about it, so I realized that people need to know more about it. That is also the purpose of the conference, since it’s something that greatly affects the art world but it doesn’t have a lot of visibility,” Tamir says.

    That lack of visibility stems in part from the fact that artists who choose not to cooperate with Israel do not always admit this openly. Sometimes they simply fail to respond to emails or cite other reasons not to show their work in Israel. Because there is no active protest in such cases, says Tamir, “It’s very difficult to concretize because it’s actually the absence of something.” For the same reason it is difficult to determine how many Israeli artists have not been invited to events abroad as a result of the boycott.

    But for some cultural events overseas the boycott’s impact is tangible. That was the case for the 2014 Sao Paulo biennial. “It was right after the [Gaza] war in the summer, relations between Israel and Brazil were tense,” explains Tamir. “The biennial is one of the biggest art events in the world, and [last] year it was curated by a group that included two Israeli curators, Galit Eilat and Oren Sagiv. The biennial requested support from the Israeli Embassy in Brazil, along with all the other embassies, and Israel gave money. A few days before the opening, objections were raised. A compromise was reached, according to which the money from the Israeli Foreign Ministry would be used only by Israeli artists taking part in the biennial. That way the foreign artists would ostensibly not be benefiting from money that came from Israel, Tamir says.

    Another example of the cultural boycott at the height of Operation Protective Edge was the cancelation of Belu-Simion Fainaru’s participation in the International Canakkale Biennial, in Turkey. In a letter to the Israeli sculptor, the artistic director of the biennial, Beral Madra, explained that given the cultural-political-social situation in Turkey Fainaru’s presence or the display of his work at the event would be inappropriate. She noted that even though the message of his work was pro-peace, it related to Jerusalem’s Western Wall, and that the organizers of this biennial were determined to avoid the inclusion of any work containing national or religious symbolism.

    Noam Segal, who in the past several years has curated a number of exhibitions that have included artists from abroad, says the refusal to show in Israel can take many forms. “I wanted to invite Laure Provost, the winner of the 2013 Turner Prize, to participate in an exhibition I’m working on, but she is a signatory to the boycott and won’t come. The same goes for Mark Leckey, who said it in a different way. Other artists have not officially signed on to the boycott but don’t respond to the invitation and it’s clear they don’t want to come. In September an exhibition I curated opened in Los Angeles and most of the artists were Israeli. There were a few journalists who wrote me to say they were impressed by the exbibition, but due to the current situation they preferred not to write reviews of exhibitions that were identified as Israeli.”

    One of the goals of Thursday’s conference is to raise awareness about the existence of the boycott. “It’s a very sensitive subject that gets people fired up, for good and for ill,” says Tamir. “Within our group, some people support the boycott and some oppose it, and there are those who are aware of the contradiction, since it’s difficult to boycott yourself. We ask ourselves how is it possible to work in the field of art, that tries to be international, and at the same time to deal with a boycott from outside.”

    Tamir draws a connection between the boycott and the threats to freedom of expression within Israel. “Israel is already a kind of an island. On the other hand, within Israel there is more hostility toward freedom of expression. What the war in the summer showed us was very scary. A boycott is a type of freedom of expression. Whether or not you agree with it, people have the right to practice it and to call for it. To discuss the issue of whether it’s justified or not is a different matter, but even if people have controversial views they have a right to express them.

    “It’s very difficult for someone who supports both freedom of expression and freedom of action. There’s a contradiction. That’s the main issue of the boycott. If we remain completely alone here, with only our own voices and no international artist agrees to exhibit here, what would that tell us?”

    One of the speakers at the conference, Hila Cohen-Schneiderman, a curator at the Petah Tikva Museum of Art who also works independently, plans to offer a proposal she calls “utopian.” She argues that Israel is already disconnected from the Arab world, preferring to “think that we belong to Europe or the United States.” The Arab boycott only reinforces this tendency. Instead she proposes that “if Arab artists were to exhibit here and make us see the place we belong to, it would be much more effective.” In that spirit she wanted to include in an upcoming exhibition a piece by Rabia Mroue,a Lebanese artist, about the civil war in Syria.

    “I asked him for permission to show the work and never got an answer. In the end I came to understand in a roundabout way that the answer was negative. I see it as vital for the Israeli audience to see what is happening in Syria. If an artist like James Turrell were to boycott Israel but an artist like Rabia Mroue were to show his works here, we would benefit much more.”

    Udi Edelman, a curator at the Israeli Center for Digital Art who also works independently and is one of the conference organizers, says he finds it difficult to either support fully or reject fully the idea of the boycott.

    “Going all the way with it means deciding that we will no longer invite international artists, but that is a very difficult think and it isn’t necessarily the right decision. On the other hand, it would be interesting to have international artists consider these questions more deeply. If they boycott, they should do it openly or go deeper into the questions of our existence here.”

  • Shlomo Sand to secular Jews: I’m not Jewish and neither are you - Books Israel News | Haaretz

    http://www.haaretz.com/life/books/.premium-1.626312

    Shlomo Sand to secular Jews: I’m not Jewish and neither are you
    In his new book, the controversial historian challenges secular and anti-Zionist Jews to define their identity.

    #shlomo_sand for ever

    • Missing in Action After the Storm Over the « Invention of the Jewish People »
      Whatever Happened to Shlomo Sand ?
      by PAUL ATWOOD
      http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/02/14/whatever-happened-to-shlomo-sand

      Since publication (of The Invention of the Jewish People ) Sand appears to have gone underground. I, at least, have tried to find an address whereby to contact him but have been unable to do so and this causes me to wonder whether the extremely hostile response he has engendered has forced him to bunker down.

      En Allemagne nous sommes confrontés à la diffamation systématique de tout et chacun défendant des thèses qui ressemblent seulement de loin à celles de Sand : Tu parles sur un ton un peu engagé en faveur des droit humains pour les palestiniens, tu es journaliste, ta carrière est finie. Tu es un invité étranger à une discussion publique, on annule la réservation de la salle sur intervention d’un politicien haut placé du parti ... (mettez ici le nom du parti qui vous convient, le résultat sera le même).

      Bref critiquer sérieusement Israel en Allemagne équivaut à se situer hors du context politique et journalistique officiel. Ton audience se limite désormais aux quelques radicaux et libre-penseurs convaincus du bien fondé de tes arguments.

      C’est malheureux pour les Allemands qui par manque de connaissances en langues étrangères ne lisent que des publications en allemand, c’est malheureux pour la culture politique en Allemagne où les idées discutées en public se développent dans un sens rétrograde depuis l’éradication de la concurrence idéologique par la RDA, depuis la récupération du mouvement populaire à l’Est par la droite et depuis les purges chez les verts il y a vingt ans environ.

      Heureusement chez nous les dissidents critiques à la ligne officielle ne sont pas encore obligés de choisir la clandestinité pour se protéger contre les atteintes à leur intégrité physique.

      #allemagne #israel #dissidence

  • Dogs of war: Animals get PTSD too
    Could your pets be suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder? Yes, according to some animal behavioral experts, who have diagnosed and treated the problem in dogs.
    By #Ruth_Schuster | Jul. 31, 2014 | 11:39 AM
    http://www.haaretz.com/life/science-medicine/.premium-1.608048

    Under conditions of combat, it’s difficult to take a time-out to help animals, especially when you’re in the field. Some do try, though.

    “Just this week I heard about a soldier in #Gaza who found a small white kitten in the rubble,” says Let the Animals Live’s Altman. Not having many options, the soldier simply took the tiny thing into the tank, where it lived for some days until it could be taken to a veterinarian for treatment. “Its mouth was full of ulcers and it was infested with fleas,” says Altman.

    Happily for the kitten, under the circumstances, it’s deaf – and the soldier has vowed to adopt it when he gets home from the war, Altman adds. But talk about traumatic conditions – that kitty hit the PTSD jackpot. Will he develop it? That will take weeks to find out.

    Meanwhile, abandoned dogs in the south who were rescued and taken to a pound in Ashkelon barely react to sirens, if at all, attests Dr. Sharon Maoz Navon, a veterinarian with Let the Animals Live. The pound is a noisy place to begin with, and, being from the south with its frequent rocket attacks, they may have become used to the sound of the sirens, she speculates.

    But more to the point, the sirens have no cost for them. “Nothing happens that causes them direct pain. If they felt a blow after the siren, they would associate the noise with pain. But in this case it’s just noise. They don’t know a missile is on the way. If a siren were to be followed by a missile falling on the pound, they’d feel differently and a proportion of them would likely develop PTSD.” So why would a dog inside a house who’s suffered no pain pee on the floor? “They can smell our pheromones. They can smell our fear,” Maoz Navon says. “And then they react with fear.”

    #Israel #Israël

  • NBA star Dwight Howard blasted for #FreePalestine tweet
    http://www.haaretz.com/life/sports/1.605238

    Howard, who has some 15 million followers on Twitter, deleted the Tweet after 15 minutes, according to thewire.com. He followed this with a clarification: “Previous tweet was a mistake. I have never commented on international politics and never will.”

    The Zionist Organization of America, however, has urged a stronger condemnation, givemesport.com reported. “He should be publicly condemned as strong as Donald Sterling was,” the website cited ZOA President Morton Klein as saying.

    “Anyone who uses the phrase ’Free Palestine’ is either ignorant of the situation or hates the Jewish state of Israel. It’s a hateful position. Celebs have great influence. When he makes a ridiculously false statement like ’Free Palestine,’ it’s frightening,” Klein said.

    #terreur

  • FIFA chief: I’m an ambassador of the Palestinians
    Sepp Blatter vows to help Palestinians in meeting with Palestinian President Abbas, promises solution for Israeli travel restrictions on soccer players.
    By The Associated Press | May 27, 2014 |
    Haaretz
    http://www.haaretz.com/life/sports/1.595461

    FIFA President Sepp Blatter said Monday he is determined to solve the Palestinian Football Association’s ongoing problems with Israel in high-level meetings.

    Some members of the Palestinian national team have been prevented from travel by what Israel calls security restrictions.

    The head of the Palestinian association has called for FIFA sanctions against Israel.

    Blatter told Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in a meeting on Monday that “we shall find a solution” but that “it will not be so easy to deal on the other side,” meaning Israel.

    Blatter said he will meet Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Tuesday. The 78-year-old Swiss pledged his support, telling Abbas that “your people, but also your football association, is not alone in the world”.

    Blatter said he is a “self-declared ambassador of the Palestine people”.

  • Protests in #Israel staged by asylum seekers from Africa | World news | theguardian.com
    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/22/protests-israel-asylum-seekers-africa

    Thousands of asylum-seekers who entered Israel illegally from Sudan and Eritrea have staged protests outside UN offices and foreign embassies in Tel Aviv, accusing Israel of neglecting its responsibilities under the 1951 UN Convention on Refugees. At the same time, supporters held parallel protests at Israeli embassies in 12 capitals, including London, Washington and Paris.

    “We left our homeland and our beloved families because of intimidation, persecution and genocide,” said Filmon Rezene, 26, who said he risked death if he returned to his native Eritrea. Rezene escaped in a jailbreak six years ago after he was imprisoned for questioning the military’s role in his university studies. Three years ago, he was smuggled into Israel over the border with Egypt, across the Sinai desert after a long journey via Ethiopia, Sudan and Libya.

    “We are demanding that the UN Human Rights Commission and the international community intervene to stop Israel arresting asylum seekers in the street and make sure there is transparent and fair processing of our requests for refugee status,” he said.

    #demandeurs_d'asile #réfugiés #répression #manif