Tribune de Ahmad Jarba dans le Washington Post : Bashar al-Assad’s ‘blood election’. Ce passage délirant :
▻http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ahmad-al-jarba-bashar-al-assads-blood-election/2014/06/02/4ad6b4e4-ea6b-11e3-93d2-edd4be1f5d9e_story.html
Some observers assert that the crisis in Syria cannot be solved and that Assad is there to stay. But neither the United States nor the Syrian people can afford to take such a defeatist perspective. The high price of disengagement would include conceding a haven from which al-Qaeda and the Iran-backed extremist organization Hezbollah could plan and launch attacks against the United States, Europe and the West’s Middle Eastern allies. The United States and the moderate Syrian opposition are in a common struggle to defeat enemies that seek to do us both harm.
Question rhétorique de Angry Arab : mais qui peuvent bien être ces « West’s Middle Eastern allies » qu’il faudrait à tout prix protéger du méchant Hezbollah ?