SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
▻http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/13-132_8l9c.pdf
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS delivered the opinion of the Court.
These two cases raise a common question: whether the
police may, without a warrant, search digital information
on a cell phone seized from an individual who has been
arrested.
Held : The police generally may not, without a warrant, search digital information on a cell phone seized from an individual who has been arrested.
Supreme court endorses cellphone privacy rights in sweeping ruling
▻http://www.theguardian.com/law/2014/jun/25/supreme-court-police-cellphones-search
The US supreme court delivered a landmark endorsement of electronic privacy on Wednesday, ruling that police must obtain a warrant to search the contents of cellphones seized from people they have arrested.
All nine justices joined the ruling on a case hailed by civil liberties campaigners as a crucial test of the rights of individuals to be protected against intrusion into their ever-expanding digital lives.
Question : est-ce que cela s’applique également aux frontières ?