Al Akhbar

http://english.al-akhbar.com

  • After Iraq – As‘ad AbuKhalil
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/blogs/angry-corner/after-iraq

    Iran, Syria and the “Refusalness” (mumanaah) camp will prematurely read the obituary of the US as a superpower. But the US retreat is bigger than US propaganda will allow. This is a watershed moment. It can’t be compared to Suez because back then there were ready inheritors of the British Empire. There are no willing inheritors of the US. Both Syrian and Hezbollah propaganda exaggerate the power and will of the Russian government. They also underestimate the domestic problems there.

  • Obama campaigns with rabbi who doesn’t want “too many Arabs” in Israel | Al Akhbar English
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/blogs/gadfly/obama-campaigns-rabbi-who-doesnt-want-too-many-arabs-israel

    Obama was introduced with warm praise by Rabbi Eric Yoffie, the outgoing president of the Union for Reform Judaism, and arguably the most prominent Reform Jew in the United States. Yoffie is a major Obama campaign surrogate, whose endorsement is featured on a pro-Obama website created by the liberal Zionist Israel lobbying group, J Street.

    […]

    Earlier this year, Yoffie published the transcript of an argument he had with a right-wing friend who helped him lobby against the Palestinian Authority’s bid for statehood at the UN. He entitled the piece, “I prefer to live with Jews.”

  • Historic Bookstores in Damascus Closing Doors | Al Akhbar English
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/historic-bookstores-damascus-closing-doors

    Damascus - For some four decades, Maysaloun bookstore in the heart of Damascus was one of the city’s most important sources for publications on leftist and progressive thought, but in January of 2010, it closed its doors after its owners put it up for commercial investment.

    This historical bookstore was not the first to meet such a fate; many other bookstores had already been converted into shops, fast food restaurants, or branches of the private commercial banks that have invaded the Syrian market in recent years.

  • Designing Damascus: A Failed Bid for Architectural Modernization? | Al Akhbar English
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/designing-damascus-failed-bid-architectural-modernization

    The Syrian Regime’s bid to showcase Damascus as a capital of modern architecture is facing serious hurdles after one of its gem projects appears to be on hold.

    Une image inspirée des souks, paraît-il?


    #Syrie
    #architecture
    #urbanisme

  • CNN hands over Republican foreign policy debate to neocon cabal | Al Akhbar English
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/blogs/gadfly/cnn-hands-over-republican-foreign-policy-debate-neocon-cabal

    When Republican primary candidates debate foreign policy issues tonight, CNN’s Wolf Blitzer (a former researcher for AIPAC) will mouth questions provided to him by the Heritage Foundation and the American Enterprise Institute (AEI). While the Heritage Foundation is well known as the outsourced brain of Republicans in Congress and serves as a hothouse for right-wing GOP domestic policies, AEI’s participation in the debate is even more problematic.

    The Washington Post pointed out that some of the candidates have close relationships with the think tanks, noting Newt Gingrich’s 12-year-long fellowship at AEI and Mitt Romney’s employment of several former Heritage fellows. “Can the two think tanks divorce themselves from the candidates they are tied to in order to produce an impartial debate?” the Post asked.

    But this is the wrong question, or at least not the most salient one. The problem with CNN allowing Heritage and AEI to dictate the questions and content of the GOP debate is that it provides the neocon cabal with a national platform to sell Americans on the need for war with Iran and for continued subsidization of Israel’s colonization of the West Bank. AEI is the nerve center for the neocon cabal; it is where the now-discredited case for invading Iraq was developed.

  • Syria and the Arab League II: The Motives | As‘ad AbuKhalil
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/blogs/angry-corner/arab-league-and-syria-motives

    The Arab League acted only because the US failed to obtain a vote in the Security Council. The League is now a useful tool for US foreign policies and wars. The irony is that the League (under the former clownish direction of Amr Mousa) gave legitimacy to NATO bombing of a member state and has now gotten in the business of surrendering the “joint defense” of the Arabs to an outside force. Arab countries in the League are all committed to the “Joint Defense Pact” which has been ignored in numerous inter-Arab wars and in foreign invasions against one Arab state, with the support of some Arab states.

    Let us remember that the Syrian regime has no credibility in this matter at all, as it joined the US coalition in 1990-91 to attack Iraq and its army. The same game that the Syrian government is complaining about, was perfected by the Saudi, Egyptian, and Syrian regimes in 1990.

    The Arab League’s motives are not related to the plight of the Arab uprisings. They are part of US regional orders. They are also part of the rising ambition of the emirate of Qatar (more on this factor in the next article): it now wants to prove to the US that it can be as subservient and loyal to US imperial interests as Saudi Arabia and Jordan. Qatar, in other words, is proving its usefulness to the US (and Israel). The Arab League has proven that it can only be allowed to be relevant to the extent to which it can strictly follows US dictates. That is why it is preferable that the Arab League remain irrelevant.

  • Arab League and the Syrian Crisis | Al Akhbar English
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/blogs/angry-corner/arab-league-and-syrian-crisis

    It would be foolhardy for the Syrian people to trust the intentions of the Arab League. This is a body that is led by some of the worst offenders of human rights the world over. The GCC countries never expressed any respect for the suffering of the Syrian people: they bankrolled the Assad tyranny for years. Any hope placed on the Arab League by any Syrian will be dashed. They can just as easily and quickly strike a deal with the Syrian regime at the expense of the Syrian people. The region is changing fast: GCC countries are getting more aggressive, and Arab countries facing uprisings continue to kill people in large numbers.

    But the rules of the game are not entirely set but the Arab League’s new masters. GCC countries are dealing with a new environment where “masked men” have bombed the Egyptian gas pipeline to Israel for the 7th time. And more “masked men” will be seen roaming the Arab streets in the near future.

  • L’éditorial (particulièrement intéressant) de As‘ad AbuKhalil dans Al-Akhbar version anglaise : Progressive versus Reactionary Islam
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/blogs/angry-corner/progressive-versus-reactionary-islam

    Calls for reform within Islam ignore the fact that there has been a reformist and progressive Islam that dates back to the 1950s and 1960s: it was the Islam that was promoted and supported by Egypt’s Nasser regime.

    Back then and for much of the Cold War, there was a civil war within Islam: Saudi Arabia and the other pro-American dictatorships of the Middle East supported and promoted a reactionary and conservative Islam defined by the standards of Wahhabism—one of the most intolerant and exclusionary religious movements in Islam.

    Nasser, on the other hand, promoted a very different Islam. His was an Islam that supported gender equality and promoted women and fought obscurantism. Nasser used Egypt’s foremost religious institution, the al-Azhar, through his ally, cleric Mahmud Shaltut, to push for a reformed and enlightened Islam.

    It was under Nasser that al-Azhar opened its doors to women, and ended the takfir (declaration of infidelity) of Shiites by the highest religious establishment.

    Shaltut and Nasser never made the distinction between Sunnis and Shiites (it is unthinkable that Nasser would ever speak in such language given he avoided any sectarian language about Muslims and Christians). But Nasser did not have only Saudi Arabia and its wealth against him: He also had to contend with the US and Western governments.

    In the service of Israel and taking into account Cold War interests, the US supported the reactionary version of Islam and the creation of Muslim organizations backed by Saudi Arabia because it was more worried about communism and leftism.

  • Lebanon: Divided and Dependent | As‘ad AbuKhalil | Al Akhbar English
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/blogs/angry-corner/lebanon-divided-and-dependent

    It is fair to say that both sides are now waiting for the picture in Syria to get clearer. March 14 – which for the first few weeks of the Syrian uprising decided to ignore and not cover it (only As-Safir and al-Akhbar really extensively covered the uprising at first) – initially cautioned against any intervention in internal Syrian affairs. But Saudi orders soon followed and the movement quickly engaged in blatant agitation: it was ironic that the movement known for racist mobilization against Syrians, which resulted in the murder of hundreds of Syrian workers and attacks on hundreds of others, suddenly started to champion Syrian people and their cause.

    On the other side, March 8, which cheered the Tunisian and Egyptian uprisings, suddenly found fault with the Arab uprisings and suspected an American plot behind them as soon as they reached Syria. The Hariri camp acts as if the regime is about to fall any second now. March 8 seems more nervous and Hezbollah media either ignore the protests and the bloody record of the regime, or rehash the Syrian regime’s propaganda. Lebanese factions are now arguing over electricity plans and budget issues while they keep their eyes on the neighbor next door.

    Lebanon’s fate has always been shaped by outsiders, largely due to the Lebanese sectarian system which instituted sponsors for each sect. And then the Zionist usurping entity saw fit to interfere and bomb at will in any place in the region. Lebanon has never been less independent.

  • Syrian Protests and the Media: Part I – Al Akhbar English – As‘ad AbuKhalil
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/blogs/angry-corner/syrian-protests-and-media-part-i

    Arab viewers are left to scramble between Saudi-Qatari media on the one hand, and the Syrian media on the other hand. It is a war of propaganda where truth is the sure victim. Syrian speakers (on the various outlets) are rather effective for their cause: unlike Lebanese speakers, they are consistently articulate and eloquent in the use of the Arab language. [...] Syria is not winning the propaganda war, but the Saudi and Qatari media are not doing any better.

  • Ce billet d’Al Akhbar en anglais rappelle l’importance de la guerre du Liban de 2006 et ce qu’elle a changé dans l’attitude « mentale » des arabes. Très intéressant.

    Science, technology, education and research : these must become the new front lines of the Arab Revolt – Rami Zurayk
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/blogs/land-and-people/science-technology-education-and-research-these-must-become-new-f

    This transformation is a crucial mental leap in the process of self-liberation of the mind. It also ushers a change in the balance of power. We reached this point in Lebanon in 2006, when a handful of resistant confronted the elite Golani brigade of the Zionist army in South Lebanon and made its soldiers cry for their mothers to come and save them. This is when the legend of the mighty Israeli army was truly shattered and everything suddenly became clear. This is when we all understood that there is no such thing as an elite Israeli brigade; only little cowardly people who hide behind their tanks and their planes. This is when we understood that for nearly 60 years we had been defeated in our minds. This why our victory in July 2006 was essentially won over our own minds. Today we have changed the nature of the struggle. Today we resist because we want a better world and not because we are hopeless and desperate. We fight to live and not to die.

  • The Mossad in Hollywood Movies – As‘ad AbuKhalil | Al Akhbar English
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/blogs/angry-corner/mossad-hollywood-movies

    Western depictions of Israeli terrorists always include invented stories of “anguish” and moral “reflection”: Western Zionists need to offer propaganda in order to soften the impact of Israeli terrorism. And certainly, Western portrayals of Mossad “adventures” skip over their most memorable acts: their kidnapping of a man in Lebanon in 2006 because they mistook him for his namesake Hezbollah leader Hasan Nasrallah; their many assassinations of innocent Palestinians because of mistaken identities typical Israeli terrorist recklessness; their famous dispatch of a hit team of fools to Dubai last year to target an unarmed Palestinian; the uncovering of more than 180 Israeli spy in Lebanon in the last two years (none of the Western media took note of that because they deemed it to be too embarrassing to Israel). But the Mossad needs extra help these days: what they can’t or fail to do on the ground, they can do instead in Hollywood movies.

  • Barakat Building : A Reminder of The Past – photos : Marwan Tahtah | Al Akhbar English
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/photoblogs/barakat-building-reminder-past

    Barakat Building stands as a memory of 15 years of civil war. A scar in the heart of Beirut that stands to remind the population of the atrocities that were committed between 1975 and 1990.

    The building is now said to be transformed into a museum to keep the memory alive. A memory of a time that still haunts us decades after, and a memory of a dying architectural heritage.

    The building was first built by architect Youssif Aftimos, then Fouad Jozah added two stories onto the building in 1932. Its neo-Ottoman design is a rare sight, nowadays, in the new skyscraper setting of Beirut.

    Des bâtiments en ruine au Liban, ça ne manque pas. Celui-ci cependant est emblématique de la guerre à Beyrouth.

    Il me semble que la laideur générale de la reconstruction et le néolibéralisme de la spéculation immobilière, en achevant de détruire les sublimes maisons libanaises de Beyrouth, ont donné un sens supplémentaire à cet immeuble.

  • Yves Gonzalez-Quijano : One Day I Might Dream in Arabic (Al Akhbar English)
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/yves-gonzalez-quijano-one-day-i-might-dream-arabic

    After thirty years of writing, translating and lecturing, Yves Gonzalez-Quijano has become a familiar name to Arab ears. The French Arabist who lived briefly in Beirut, Damascus, and Cairo was not drawn to Arabic culture because of its exoticism or due to feelings of superiority. He was motivated by a personal desire free from preconceived notions towards the other.
    His is a postmodern Arabism. An applied Arabism similar to applied criticism. A child of the French student protest movement and the international Left, he is part of a generation that witnessed an end to colonialism in (...)

  • Libya: The Ruined Revolution | As‘ad AbuKhalil | Al Akhbar English
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/blogs/angry-corner/libya-ruined-revolution

    Western oil companies are scrambling to get a foothold in the new Libya, just as they competed to win favor with Qaddafi’s’s regime. The Libyan Transitional Council does not bode well: it is headed by Qaddafi’s Minister of Justice and his second-in-command is the former mentor of none other than Gaddafi’s son Sayf Al-Islam. The Gaddafi era may have ended, but with NATO in charge, it is likely that the new leader of Libya is another Hamid Karzai or an even more compliant client of Western powers. Mustafa Abd al-Jalil will be the weakest leader of any Middle East country; With NATO in charge, it is certain that Libya won’t be free. For that to happen, the Libyan people have to rise up again, this time against the external forces of colonial powers, and against the reactionary ideologies that the new Libyan government will bring along with it.