L’insistance sur le lien entre changement climatique et augmentation des conflits (qui vont du vol à l’étalage à la guerre civile) mène forcément à ça :
Global warming ’will require more UK troops sent to fight overseas’
▻http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/11221586/Global-warming-will-require-more-UK-troops-sent-to-fight-overseas.html
“Climate change is never going to start a conflict on its own, or is most unlikely to. But it will be a contributing factor as it as accentuating the stresses that already exist: food, water, health for example.”
De là on ne conclut pas qu’il faut assurer aux populations concernées un accès à la nourriture, à l’eau ou à la santé (ou, à tout le moins, cesser d’accaparer leurs terres), non, il faut sécuriser ses intérêts.
If UK interests are threatened as a result it may be forced to sent troops to fight, he said, although troops may also be deployed in humanitarian or other roles.
