Tells the Facts, Names the Names

/what-to-say-when-you-have-nothing-to-sa

  • On Charlie Hebdo, Freedom of Speech, Terrorism, and the Value of Lives | Al Akhbar English
    http://english.al-akhbar.com/node/23136

    And we arrive to one last point, and this is about the value of lives. I have witnessed on social media and on news agencies a flurry of articles, statements, and dismay about the lives lost in Paris. Twelve people have died, people are horrified, and rightly so.

    Yet, on the same day, a car bomb exploded in Sanaa, Yemen, killing at least 38 people. At least nine people, including two children, have died in attacks in Afghanistan, and an unknown number of dead as the violence rages in Syria and Iraq.

    What is true today, and has been true for a while, is that ’white’ lives matter more. It garners more of an emotional reaction. It horrifies, and causes dismay, shock, and tears. Their faces and names will be etches in collective memory. Politicians will read eloquent, heart-felt eulogies.

    Black and Brown misery and deaths, on the other hand, have become so normalized, so accepted, so routine. They are numbers, footnotes, and statistics. There was no personalized video message by US Secretary of State John Kerry, speaking in the language of the victims, that offered sadness over the killing of seven pro-Syrian regime journalists after gunmen attacked their offices in June 2012. There were and are no Twitter hashtags for the dead civilians who were killed by French airstrikes during their military adventures in Mali, North Africa, and elsewhere. No one paid attention to the (terrorist?) bombing of the Colorado Springs offices of the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People) on January 6.

    Lives are simply not equal. We must ask ourselves why? To quote the American philosopher Judith Butler, “Who counts as human? Whose lives count as lives? And, finally, What makes for a grievable life?”

    These are key questions that are necessary and the answers can help us move on collectively, and the answers, I think, offer more solutions that simply hunting down and killing “terrorists.”

    #charliehebdo

  • Bon, je vais tout de même le dire : #je_ne_suis_pas_Charlie, parce que lorsque j’ai commencé à écrire sur le Web, avec plein de Copains à la fin des années 90, parmi les premiers et plus bruyants ennemis de ma propre liberté d’expression, il y avait, justement, Philippe Val et Charlie Hebdo (avec force arguments corporatistes et dénonciation des pédonazis). Et ça avait été particulièrement choquant, justement parce qu’à l’époque je croyais encore que Charlie était « dans notre camp », je croyais à leurs prétentions libertaires (la dérive néoconservatrice, les éditoriaux pro-israéliens, la supériorité de la civilisation occidentale sur ces Arabes qui n’ont pas composé les symphonies de Beethoven ni inventé les avions, l’islamophobie ouverte qui ne se limitait pas, loin de là, à des dessins un peu trash, etc., sont arrivés rapidement ensuite, et sont plus largement documentés).

    Alors, évidemment, « rien ne justifie… », je suis abasourdi par ce qui est arrivé, compassion, etc., mais je laisse ceux qui ont brandi leur carte de journaliste hier comme si c’était un symbole de la liberté d’expression, le soin d’« être Charlie ». Charlie, pour moi, c’est le média qui a utilisé son image de gauche, voire libertaire, pour dénoncer cette belle et passionnante liberté d’expression qui arrivait avant tant de force et d’enthousiasme sur l’Internet.